@@juliane_steinwachs-zeil Dear Juliane! As you said, No.5 is a great work. I will have to listen to No.5 a little more carefully. I sincerely appreciate your generous comment. I found out a few days ago that it seems to be a live recording of WTC book 1-2 by Russian pianist Richter in 1972, and I have been listening to it every time I eat. I had several errors while practicing No.5 from Book 1 today. However, I could not guarantee the quality of the practice because I kept my own principle of not repeating the work to the end even if I made a mistake during the practice. But I lowered the piano volume while practicing the piano at dawn to think of my neighbors. I raised the piano volume a little while practicing this afternoon, and I felt that the sound was a little richer. I plan to continue to practice WTC all the way through sight-reading whenever I have time to practice the piano. Thank you! Warm greetings!🎼🎹🎵😊
WC 1 NO. 5 is truly a beautiful work by Bach! Bach sounds beautiful even at a slow tempo! 👌😊🎶
@@juliane_steinwachs-zeil
Dear Juliane! As you said, No.5 is a great work. I will have to listen to No.5 a little more carefully. I sincerely appreciate your generous comment.
I found out a few days ago that it seems to be a live recording of WTC book 1-2 by Russian pianist Richter in 1972, and I have been listening to it every time I eat.
I had several errors while practicing No.5 from Book 1 today. However, I could not guarantee the quality of the practice because I kept my own principle of not repeating the work to the end even if I made a mistake during the practice.
But I lowered the piano volume while practicing the piano at dawn to think of my neighbors. I raised the piano volume a little while practicing this afternoon, and I felt that the sound was a little richer.
I plan to continue to practice WTC all the way through sight-reading whenever I have time to practice the piano. Thank you!
Warm greetings!🎼🎹🎵😊
Brilliant Bach 😊😊
@MooreMusic12
Little Pianist! Thank you for your generous comment!😊😊