Testing 500 Series Pre-Amp & Compressor Modules from Clean to Dirty on Bass Guitar

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @Yawsounds
    @Yawsounds 8 дней назад +1

    And some say "500 series gear isnt as good as 19" rack gear"?? This sounds phat!🔥

  • @dkijc
    @dkijc 5 месяцев назад +2

    I came to check out the gears.. Stayed for that groove! Thanks for sharing!

  • @ftlaud911
    @ftlaud911 Год назад +1

    Nice playing!!! Sounded awesome. Gave me a Jane's Addiction vibe. Love it!! Well done man.

  • @kurtralske4026
    @kurtralske4026 Год назад +1

    Great sounds and great playing

  • @michaelcurnutt
    @michaelcurnutt 9 месяцев назад +1

    Love the sound, I keep coming back. How you compared the Retro Intruments Double wide II if not what do you think?

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  9 месяцев назад

      Thank you for the compliment. I have only compared the double wide to a bunch of other 500 series compressors. But not to my 19” Gates Retro Sta-level “yet”

  • @grownprosper
    @grownprosper 10 месяцев назад +1

    I know this is unrelated but very nice drum sounds! Am interested to know your drum processing chain if there's any. Also nice bass tones!

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  10 месяцев назад

      The drums came from a pre-recorded drum sample pack. :)

  • @top5dummy
    @top5dummy 10 месяцев назад +1

    Is the chandler compatible with the Neve R6 . I’ve heard a lot of issue , like hum and high noise floor.. Does it work for you?

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  10 месяцев назад +1

      There is a higher noise floor and I've been meaning to address this with Chandler. I had no idea that this was a common issue. I will say that it's hardly noticeable when I'm tracking bass but it is there if you crank the gain and listen closely when not playing.

  • @nickjones5641
    @nickjones5641 10 месяцев назад +1

    If you had to pick the Retro or Chandler, which one would you choose? I'm going back and forth between the two.

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  10 месяцев назад

      The Retro is tube and the Chandler is solid state. Both sound different. Apples and Oranges. I think the low-end extension on the Chandler is deeper hence why I chose it for the channel focused on that spectrum however the Retro has that tube-based sound and I chose it for my dirty channel. They both complement each other.

    • @nickjones5641
      @nickjones5641 10 месяцев назад

      Thanks! Musictech said that the TG Opto ate some of the low end. I guess they're not accurate in their reviews. Others have liked the TG Opto for bass. @@ManCaveStudio

  • @alexdawson7851
    @alexdawson7851 Год назад +1

    What are your thoughts on the retro compressor?

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  Год назад

      It's a great compressor in my book. I read some mixed reviews however in my shootout I chose the Retro over many other brands. I am using this for bass so results may vary in other applications.

  • @LucLeeRudd
    @LucLeeRudd Год назад +1

    What are you using to split the signal?

    • @ManCaveStudio
      @ManCaveStudio  Год назад

      Boss LS-2 However in this video I used a bass which has two outputs so I did not need to use the Boss LS-2.

  • @inframundo1919
    @inframundo1919 Год назад +1

    Que bien que suenan esa batería y ese bajo