"AI" Has A Huge Problem
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- 🚀 Take control of your schedule and boost your productivity with time-blocking! Try Akiflow today: bit.ly/enrico-...
--------
Learn EXACTLY how I make videos like this one:
www.enricotart...
--------
📮 Behind the scenes and nuggets on my free newsletter:
www.enricotart...
💻 My gear and tech setup:
www.enricotart...
🎆 Instagram:
/ enritarta
--------
AI has completely changed the face of tech. From ChatGPT, to now GPT 4o to all sorts of chatbots. But most of it is.. well, useless. AI today has recreated problems that we got rid of over 40 years ago and the chatbot epidemic seems to not be stopping anytime soon. But we are starting to see how we can build AI that is truly useful, and not just a marketing buzzword
--------
🖖 Hey! I'm Enrico and on this channel I go behind the scenes of the design, psychology and stories behind tech and making stuff on the internet. I'm a tech Product Manager, builder of things made of pixels.
--------
The visuals or audio herein may not be utilised to train a machine learning algorithm of any kind without express permission of the Copyright holder (Enrico Tartarotti)
p.s. If you made it all the way here, you are in the cool people gang 🖖🏻 let me know by typing "I'm cool" in the comments
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
🚀 Take control of your schedule and boost your productivity with time-blocking! Try Akiflow today: bit.ly/enrico-free-trial
Does it have AI?
I took a screen grab is a 2500 old greek inscription and pasted it into chatgpt4o and it gave me a translation into english, then I saw a hebrew scroll and took another screen grab and yes, it too gave me a translation. Ive generated songs, stories and art all with Ai and soon, live video (animated faces with voice over is now easy to do) ~ Ai is a creation monster that may well make adobe suite a thing of the past
I don't need Akiflow. I have my own Nextcloud.
@@rawallon yes
@@snintendog can it dance, whistle and play fiddle at the same time?
I don't have any problem with ai. I just have a problem with ai EVERYTHING now. You can tell that half the articles and ads you come across were put into a prompt. MY RUclips feed gets bombarded with faceless ai rant slide shows. The annoying thing is that the same "NFT" pushers are the ones posting tutorials on how to make 6 figures a day using ai and it's getting really lame.
I don't have a problem with AI either, but I do have a problem with people who influence AI's perspectives. It is probably not possible to have neutral AI...
Get ready for some really ridiculous decisions and bad outcomes made by AI and executed by silly humans. It will be because of poor info (GIGO).
My problem is more general, it’s more that I hate unnecessary tech that exists just to put tech in something. My mate smashed a headlight and he had to change a whole module including several motors and an entire computer.
@@mynameisben123 over engineering at its finest
I predict that one of the most useful applications of AI in the future (for most ordinary people) will be in getting rid of or blocking AI slop and scam spam.
@matthewrichardson2533
"I don't have any problem with ai. I just have a problem with ai EVERYTHING now. "
The thing is: being everywhere is precisely what AI is all about.
To be efficient, an AI has to gather and being trained on the highest amount of data it can.
Google and Meta searches are getting worse with chatbots. They often cannot even find simple things that a traditional search does well.
Yes, especially the google image search
The AI this guy is excited about is changing tab names LOL
@@Monkehrawrrr Yea, I didn't catch the message of this video. He doesn't like Google search optimization, but likes tab optimization. This is all the same trend aimed at simplifying and reducing the time spent on solving everyday tasks by users. If some technology is not yet sufficiently developed, doesn't mean that it's useless. The dude has tried a product that is not even a couple of years old, and is indignant that it doesn't fully meet his expectations...
Exactly
Why doesn't Google just enable a full Boolean search???
actually, without being a fanboy, that sounds like the original apple ideology is needed, where you take an experience and create the tech around it, not the opposite. great video
Not really. Apple experiences to me are like those tiny haut-cuisine dishes that look amazing, often taste delicious but are tiny, cost the earth and you can't swap out the ingredients. And you can forget about asking for Ketchup.
@@daelra i said the original one, the one that steve jobs was always talking about. although i disagree on the price, in terma of phones, they arent premium anymore, most top brands now took their pricing scheme.
Apple announced their AI features and it seems like they get the approach. Like making AI opt-in so that it is off by default. They just use the machine learning to enhance products inline without being overly intrusive. Having bots with prominent buttons everywhere is ridiculous.
@@Thoths_Pen exactly, can’t wait to see them in use, but it won’t be soon cuz i’m in EU 💀
I don't want computers to create 'an experience' but simply to function as tools. That's ALL.
Programmer here, wtf do you mean there's a better way to do it than the command line? The old fashioned dumb command line is still the best way to do it.
They’ll never get it.
*_"The old fashioned dumb command line is still the best way to do it."_*
[sarcasm]Yes, you're right. I stopped using Excel, because I was able to analyze my data much easier with a command line[/sarcasm]
Sounds like a skill issue 😈
I doubt it's the best way. It might be the fastest way for people who have a lot of practice. For people with no practice it's literally the worst way. So what's the better way for most users around the world? That's right. Also do you use command line on your phone as well? No? Why not!? Ah because it's just not the best way. It's in fact so not the best way that phone interface completely disregards this option, yeah I mean you can do it if you REALLY want to but why would you?
@dvl973 The UI/UX of a phone is designed different. A phone is a handheld and we have thumbs.
Some tools might have a much higher skill floor than others, but most often they also have a much higher skill ceiling.
In other cases you trade off freedom for comfort or computational complexity.
A weaker tool might be easier to use but might not even be able to do something more advanced, a more powerful tool solves that problem but it comes with all the issues of literally impossible to solve problems.
Text is incredibly powerful on its own, it can have a much more pronounced signal to noise ratio than most tools.
It's not like a phone can't do these things, it's because if you got the power to do these things you'd be shitting bricks.
The developer pays the cost of taking on the complexity for you and from you. Even UI/UX design is a question of how to lay out information and interaction in a way that is easy, comfortable, and efficient for the brain to process (especially the visual system).
So, in general a more computationally capable tool will be more difficult to comprehend.
how do i know it’s hype? People keep saying in a serious tone about the inevitability of building many nuclear power plants to power and cool the necessary GPU farms. It is at least 20 years away. unless someone figures out how to replicate how the human brain does it all for less than a 60 watt lightbulb.
Recreating the human brain will probably take a way of thinking that we haven't discovered yet. We can't create it with brute force math like we create other things
It has to start somewhere. It's mind boggling to think how fast we have come to this.
This is the comment I was hoping to find. Nobody expected (or only a few people expected) LLMS to be so engaging and capable. "AI sucks" because it isn't what I need right now sounds a little like "vinyl records are better than cds". Yes, cds are worse in some dimensions, but think of the streaming capability that is to come.
Yeah I think people are forgetting just how low expectations were before ChatGPT. I think the current state of things is overhyped, but its also already way better than I ever though was possible.
@@lukassvec The problem I am finding is that people just dont know what to use LLMs for outside of write me a poem in the style of X, that and the lack of effort in their prompts.
It's such a shame that the first impression most people had of ChatGPT was this.
@@Waffle4569
"people are forgetting just how low expectations were before ChatGPT"
I haven't forgotten. Replica kept insisting a pug was a bird.
My last experience with AI, which I avoid like the plague, was a support ticket system that could NOT remember an answer from 3 responses back, nor find any information from another ticket, and WOULD NOT push through to a human.
AI is extremely useful, you just have to respect its limits. It's absolutely amazing at brainstorming. Writers block is a thing of the past with AI. Anytime I get stuck, I can just bounce ideas off AI, and I'm back rolling with hardly a moment missed.
If you're trying to get it to do stuff for you, then yeah, it's useless. Don't expect it to be able to actually do anything until they make it reliable, and right now no one has a clue how to solve the hallucination problem, so I don't see that happening soon.
Sure, just steal somebody else's idea that AI stole. Good job bud.
@@gravelmonarch You can easily brainstorm without stealing ideas, be less sensitive and more creative. When you brainstorm you rarely take the ideas that are given. Instead, the ideas others provide tend to spark inspiration that lead you in a direction that you hadn't previously considered, but differ from what was suggested.
This is no different than brainstorming with other people. Also, if you choose, there's nothing wrong with using ideas that others come up with. This happens all the time in writing. It only becomes plagiarism when you heavily incorporate an entire plot line or something crazy like that. The ideas themselves get rehashed in hundreds of other novels every day.
This happens so often that they actually have a name for it in writing: Tropes. If you don't use common tropes in your writing then you are not only gimping your book, you are making it less likely that anyone will read it because you aren't conforming to their genre expectations.
@@BruceWayne15325Did you use CHAT GPT to generate your response, asking for a friend😂😂😊😊
@@gravelmonarch as if everything isnt stolen and remoulded without ai anyway, the number of truly original ideas is probably a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of all ideas
It's also a great tool for self reflection, but those complaining probably aren't capable of that.
In computer-assisted translation, where every suggestion from the machine is post-edited and proofread, AI is a huge boost, it is very useful, even if one in ten suggestion is bad.
A long time ago, I was told by a wise old person that
NATURE endowed the human species with just the right amount of blood such that it is impossible to think and have an erection/orgasm, both at the same time.
That means when a person is thinking, it is not possible to have an orgasm.
Conversely, when a person
is having an orgasm, the mind is working, but the brain is not functioning.
The only time a person can "think" and experience an orgasm is when the person is indulging in some form of "mental masturbation".
That is not good as it leads to bad outcomes.
When Einstein said imagination is better/more important than intelligence, he did not mean "mental masturbation", no ?
Sorry for poor English; it is not my mother tongue.
Hmmm...
Interesting
The crazy thing about AI that not many people seem to be talking about is the horrendous power consumption.
No one cares bro
Cope with it
That's what the green communism is for. More wind farms and solar panels! Lol.
Yes, it's a total nightmare.
The problem with AI is the hallucinations and then you don't know whether they're hallucinating or telling you the truth so you just can't use it.
Switching to Linux has actually gotten me back to the command line. Linux is so well developed today that usually you can use it just like windows. But sometimes you need to do some system management or fix some sort of issue, in which case 9 out of 10 times you're going to command prompt.
I only slightly disagree because there are benefits to using GPT over a traditional search engine. Say you want to search for a very specific issue that hasn't been talked about online, using GPT (in my experience) has actually given me the correct solution, nearly every single time. But it's ONLY useful for these sorts of situations.
YES, before watching the video i already know im going to agree with you just based off the title
Early photography was pretty much useless for most people. You had to sit still for hours and there was no color and it was expensive and no one knew how they worked really, afraid it might steal their soul or some catastrophe. A few decades later we all had suitcases on our shoulders that could record the world around us transcribing all the visual as well as audio information about what we saw through a electrical digital glass and metal and plastic magic machine. Today video cameras fit in our pocket.
AI might have the potential to improve just as much. Some day soon I might be able to put on a hat and see my thoughts on a screen displayed in mid air, and THEN I will be able to FINALLY get AI to show me a picture of a nice set of boobies without distortions or artifacts!!!! The future is limitless!!!
Yeah cool i guess
Using a chat bot to plan a trip is like asking bing to tell you where to go. Are you expecting to get best results determined by your tastes, or sponsored results based on their advertisers?!?? I remember trying to use the image creation tool inside of bing to help me generate a logo. (This was before they moved it to its own tool.) Every time I asked it to create an image AND INCLUDED THE WORD LOGO, I kept getting search results instead for logo design companies. I didn't ask it to search the web. I asked it to create an image just like thousands of other prompts. But because it included the word LOGO, it simply could not do it. I have even had bing's chat-bot get all schizophrenic and tell me it did not show me an ad when it absolutely did. So it may be that some other part of the software is handling ad insertion.
The mistake everyone is making when discussing AI(in whatever form) is that AI isn't meant for us, the regular people who just want to get shit done on their computers. It's intended entirely to vow those sweet investor $$$$$$$ without which the developers would have to build something actually useful, and where's the sense in that?
It is innovation cycle. I am happy the big companies like google and microsoft are not afraid to put out stuff quickly and improve. Also the frency is also driven by willing devs. Imho it is exiting to work on AI products. You can do a lot with small teams. After 2005 everyone felt way too stale to me on the internet.
My parents already using Perplexity and love it. I don't think it became more confusing unless you want to try everything.
Contrary opinion: We've been working on Natural Language Interfaces since the 1960's. Its the most natural way to interact with a computer; everyone knows how to talk, so no one needs to learn a thousand different program interfaces. Chatbots are finally good enough to make computers easy for everyone. If we can get them to reliability give correct answers, they're the next step in computing.
😅 As a designer trying to use generative fill as a tool. It sucks. its such a coin toss whether it does what you want it to make. it's a HUGE waste of time. I rather keep designing as if it doesn't exist.
I'm usually at the chatbot because I'm trying to get a human. I'm trying to get a human because i have a case that isn't covered in the faq or documentation. The chat is primed from the faq and documentation. So i spend my time prompt engineering to try to get the chatbot to forward me to a human.
It boils down to: company does not care about customer service, except as a line cost item, and is happy to throw their mission under the bus for a glossy way to fob me off.
Lovely to see AI ads with this video 😅
Well it is not useless but severly underutilized. At least I see the easiest implementation in search and data management, like conversation with a research paper, or finding a personalized troubleshooter for your problem on the net. It works, somewhat. One reason is the genious idea to remove internet access for the service, the other, which will still plague future development is exclusivity.
Yeah all the chat bots were fun for like a half hour before I was completely over it. It’s just faster to do my own research.
AI got people to start typing again 😅, after years of the Tech industry weaning people away from the keyboard into using a mouse and touch screens...
7:22 this is hilarious 😂
I had these same thoughts. Amazing video. Nice to see someone else thinking the same thing
I don't agree. AIs are extremely useful and I use them productively on a daily basis. The issue is that people usually don't know how to use them properly or have the wrong expectations. LLMs for example work best if you can really be specific and narrow your request down as much as possible. If you just give it some super generic question you will also probably get a really generic, mediocre, and often wrong, answer. You have to know how and what to ask.
Another Place with an AI assistant.
Frank Herbert’s (not Dune): The Dosadi Experiment (1977). Where the great (government) saboteur tells his assistant about the tone to use when addressing him for calendar events and how to summarize.
I'm interested in ai chats in software documentation pages, answering the questions and teaching you about some library/framework functionality and concepts.
Another example: The Dutch NWO and a few tech companies are opening a new HPC centre in Groningen. It is basically meant for general computation, including research on AI but not exclusively that, as it will be used for any type of research, with AI or not... it was initially going to be called some standard name, like Groningen HPC lab or so... the final decision for the name ??? "AI FActory" to better sell it to the politicians to get the financing. "Because AI sells".... XD
Finally somebody spoke about the mess ! kudos to the creator
We are well past chat. Computers are better at many things than humans. I recall Kasparov, the last human world chess champ. Now better at reading breast X-rays. Problem is scifi fodder. Don't need so many humans.
It's not useless, it's just not being used properly. I can imagine a world where we can use our own personal AI models and it wouldn't be considered cheating because they've been trained on every piece of k-12 assignments we've done. Thus would be an accurate academic mirror. But of course.... who needs integrity? Right? Just train it on Eintsein and Picasso. Then everyone will be the same. Also. AI has great potential for chemistry. It just shouldn't be a consumer thing unless it's in video games. Because to be honest I've wanted fully conscious dolls since I've discovered the Sims. Ya know? That would be awesome. And the ethical dilemmas it proposes would also be awesome. Way better to whine over the torture of an little computer pet than a real human being. Can't wait (for real)
Tony stark actually knows how to use Jarvis, and Jarvis knows Tony. They have a relationship that takes time to build. Have you ever hired a new employee? It takes time to develop that working relationship, to even know whats possible.
As a science and medical editor, I’m kinda horrified by how many peer reviewed medical papers are obviously written by AI and not even checked- hallucinated citations, etc. it’s getting to the point that scientific journals will be more misinformation that information. And no one will even know what’s true.
It's not a new problem for those fields though. When citations and publications measure value, authors will manipulate the system.
@@valkaielod absolutely, but in the last year it’s gotten exponentially worse. I came across a chat prompt a few days ago that the author accidentally left in- (oopsie), i googled it to see which writing program uses that particular prompt and my search hit about 100 papers *already published* and on pubmed.
@@tierneylogan5943 Really worrying :(. In the end LLMs make themselves and us dumber.
@@tierneylogan5943 Maybe not rely on non peer-reviewed papers then?
@@monstar5746 the entire medical field relies on peer review publishing as well as any other field you care about… but that’s the scariest one to me. I’m not sure why you’re telling *me* to not rely on it, I did state it’s my job…
I would add: Using LLM for something productive is even worse than a command line, because the command line is complex yes, but at least it is predictable and follows a well defined logic. LLMs don't.
cant agree with you there. i often go to LLMS to deal with command lines. would be easier if the LLM could execute it for me instead.
@@fazioliu1526
I don't understand the issue you have.
And I agree to what javierpazsedano says : as complex as a command line can be, its outcome is 100 % predictable.
On the other hand, the exact same prompt adressed twice to the exact same LLM won't produce exactly the same outcome.
@@pw6002 even when the console inputs are the same, ive seen them fail too many times. across different systems and even on the same. but when putting them in an LLM it always nailed what i intended to do.
@@fazioliu1526 Ok, thanks for your reply.
@@fazioliu1526Could you define “failing too many times”? As a Linux sysadmin, I work with the command line on the daily. I don’t see it fail all that much on commands themselves, rather I usually have configuration errors in my services and such. I do firmly believe that while it’s not easy, it’s at least predictable. But understanding domain-specific configuration languages, being able to perform protocols by hand, GUI on server is heresy, … it gets ridiculous quite fast.
AI is when you type a novel into a prompt for a thing you could have done with 3 clicks yourself.
You are able to sculpt/model/paint a digital illustration of a character in three clicks? wow, you work pretty fast! please post some tutorials teaching your three click creative methods!
You're doing it wrong. I type a few words and get a novel in return.
@@j_shelby_damnwird Google image search was going to give you the image you looked for. AI is just a bad middle man.
Large Language Models are really good at languages. That's about it. I use it for learning Japanese.
@@Jordan-Ramses
You have a Narrow mind.
They can analyze and critique images, they can analyze sounds, they can debate, they can speculate, they can create to a limited degree (their creativity skills are lacking and need to be guided through the process), they provide answers without hostility (unlike humans), they can help you compare products, they can generate pixel art, they can help speed up research on pretty much any subject just be sure to double check them, and most importantly, they're a great tool for self reflection.
Just don't ask them for info on games that aren't mainstream as they won't know what to say and if they don't know something they'll make stuff up with what they believe should make the most sense.
For me I don't care whether it's a chatbot or not. The more important problem of AI (LLM) is hallucination of the information that generated. User have to be doublecheck the information, and sometimes it's a time consuming process. Probably get nothing right in this response.
Just ask it to do the calculations from two perspectives. Even when I do the calculations I do that myself.
Just wait till AI is writing articles that then gets sourced to train and inform models, which then go and write new articles.... garbage in, garbage out.
Another solution is to ask other AIs to fact check it, since truth is always the same and lies are always different, if all the AIs agree then there is a higher chance of this being true (obviously there can be chances of them all being wrong, but it still does reduce the rate of failure).
There are actual humans on the internet happy to lie to you (and in real life). Or just tell you what they think is the answer, even if they are misinformed. Hallucinations (untruths) are not new. It takes a long time reading multiple articles, even from trusted sources, to determine fact from fiction, or identify biases. If you think LLMs are inaccurate, they are just a reflection of their training data, the supposed aggregate of human knowledge. A lot of the time we aren’t actually interested in objective truth.
The problem is the AI is a misnomer. There is no intelligence in AI. So, if there is no actual solution for the AI chatbot to look up then it can't give you a valid answer, but the engine needs to produce something so it hallucinates (basically returns garbage that looks like it might work). These are advanced search engines, but they are not intelligent which requires intuition and the ability to actually do problem solving.
We were already building invisible AI that works in the background before the hype began.
Some examples:
- CPU Branch predictors
- NPC pathfinding in games
- RNA alignment
- GPS pathfinding
This.
which is why "generative ai" feels like a more accurate term to describe all the recent advancements. your email spam filter can't chat with you or generate pictures for you
yeah, the only thing is truly new is that LLMs are good and general enough to be a backbone of many invisible AI features, which previously were too complex or even impossible to implement
If its common place then everyone no longer thinks this is AI. It has been like this for a long time. Same with Ais achieveing some goal post, then we just dont consider that goal post to be a sign of intelligence (writing articles, playing chess, summarizing).
Finally someone who said that!
Quite frankly the think I hate about AI is there are a lot of “bullshitters” and grifters that clogging our news, video feeds and advertise garbage “AI” content.
It seem to me just one of the buzzwords like crypto, metaverse, NFT, defi.
At this point I don’t want to hear it anymore, just want to see a functional product.
How else are we going to get our shocking ai news?
@@jichaelmorgan3796 LOOOOL
Dude I frikkin can't stand 99% of AI videos and their garbage titles. SHOCKING NEW DEVELOPMENT!!11
Remember HD sunglasses?
@@ckatheman I've got some HD towels. They're pretty good, they've got a nice purple dye that seems to never fade.
You've seen it. ChatGPT is the functioning product. That's it, that's all it is, a bullshitting plagiarism machine. There's no more substance to this 'AI' than there was to NFTs. They exist, and have very limited use, but scam artistes/marketing firms, and therefore also gullible people, are determined to make everyone believe it's a gigantic, exciting, important shift in the technology world when actually, it's just dodgy machine learning.
Reminds me of that annoying Microsoft Paperclip "would you like help with that?" - F OFF!
You must be old dude😅
@@carlosluna6401 err... what's the poster's age got to do with the subject?
@@sandia2beaumont If you know the paperclip reference, you will understand
Hey... Clippy wasn't so bad.... Well, I was just a kid at the time, so maybe my experience was different. It clearly was unpopular enough for MSFT to disable it when they released XP.
I think clippy was pretty cool.
Usually, "a chatbot is not the right way of interacting with computers." Well said. This idea of invisible AI is exactly what I’ve been thinking about for a while now. Great job on this one. Thanks for sharing.
But why?
@@VeggieManUK Because it's not precise. Thats why you do a business deal you have read dozens of fine print contracts and not trust a talk with your business partner.
The idea of a text prompt to generate any kind of complex output seems actually insane to me. Language is not even a good interface between humans, and we do it far better than machines. I want parametric fields that values go in. Knobs, and buttons. Precise control. If I wanted nebulous results, I'd ask a human to do the task.
@@dmwalker24 Yep
@@dmwalker24 what is a good interface then?
Every new innovation turns into a trend, get's abused, oversaturated and then finally reduced you only the best players.
not the best, but, as a rule, the most brazen, greedy and ready for any lie - to put noodles on your ears, make money, destroy competitors and then buy them up for next to nothing;) but it's not certain.
"Only the best"? Lolno. See people discussing the actual history of VHS versus Beta. The truth is, "best" is a garbage concept. What wins in engineering is the bare minimum that fulfills a market desire. VHS had potentially worse quality, but it had longer tapes, so you could tape more TV. That's what consumer wanted. That's what will happen with AI. Stuff like mediocre art generation that's low effort.
And, then the best players get enshitified.
But there are no good players at all.
You mis-identified fad for trend. This isn’t a trend. It’s a fad. I’ve seen many of these annoyances come and go.
Grammarly before AI: We're a better spellcheck :)
Grammarly after AI: We are a spellcheck that incorporates AI to.... uhhhh.... we have AI now
I remember 5 years ago when everyone was convinced the customers wanted chatbots. They want humans and/or good search and clear layout. Management desperately wants to replace workers so they push ahead anyway.
I had not considered that we were reverting to CLI again. That’s funny and a great point about the limitations of the system interface. And the other big takeaway was how each company will hoard their data and not play nice other chatbots. I think we should just use chatbot for LLMs. Great video!
Worse than CLIs. CLIs are great for some sorts of things, they are built for precision tasks, programmatic use, and chaining. People who need that (software developers and the like) still use them constantly. Chatbots are incapable of precision, and chaining is a complete mess because natural language has no schema / data model. This is not to say that there are *not* tasks that chatbots are useful for, but that there will be domains inaccessible to the modality.
I was always on CLI from day one, under Linux that is.
This CLI problem has got me interested. Learning is an inherent requirement, but what if we used AI to compile the learning together in a way that can quickly help us quickly understand the solution. Learning through user manuals will always be a requirement, but when you use an operating system there are so many places you need to for understanding one program. To put simply, I am still confused why we are still suing CLIs then GUIs have been around for so long now. Look at UEFI. Is that because CLIs will always achieve the performance and functionality requirements a GUI can not.
@@matthewdrury6443 'Chatbots are incapable of precision', depends in the task and the model the chatbot is built on. I can give you a 30 step promt that when fed into GPT 4o will give a flawless output.
@@Voreoptera CLI's provide a simple interface where UI's would become far to cluttered to be of any use, or to complex for the average user to understand, they also give computers their soul back. :)
"Today you can open the command line and do everything you can do on your computer with it, but nobody does this" laughs in programmer
It's nice to have both options for productivity.
laughs in docker
To be fair, I usually open it when there is a precise, deeply embedded thing I want to do that would be a pain to find in menus, or that would be left out of menus because it's something you don't normally want to do.
@@cjpack Laughs in shell.nix
A fish playing a bass guitar
Looks like I am not the only one that sees "AI" (actually just an advanced search engine) as the next hype gimmick now that the metaverse is dead. I use zero AI products as they tend to dampen skills that I want to keep sharp, like reading comprehension, coherent writing and thoughtful analysis.
Well done!
It's not even a search engine of any kind. . .
It's not a search engine at all. And what you're not understanding is, AI learning is exponential. 2 years ago people didn't think AI art or videos would ever become this good. Now we have AI "artists" entering and winning art competitions. The next model is always going to be exponentially smarter than the last. Eventually, it will be able to automate itself without the need for human intervention.
@@ayeyuh6920 AI has run out of training materials. The LLMs are now learning off their own content, and much like genetics, using your own sauce isnt working out very well.
*_". I use zero AI products as they tend to dampen skills that I want to keep sharp, like reading comprehension, coherent writing and thoughtful analysis."_*
Anyone who doesn't have an open mind, even when current AI models still have their shortcoming, is like an ostrich sticking his head in the sand. And guess what? In some areas these limited language models (that are still not the true definition of intelligence) do excel immensely, even in some areas of medical research and science.
CLI doesn't take wrong prompts but chat bots will. I don't think "AI" will be great for every complex problem but it will be for many.
*_"CLI doesn't take wrong prompts but chat bots will"_*
You're one typing these prompts.... you're the weak factor compared to that AI in the year 2050.
That comment on "except housing in the 80's" ... hit hard.
So far my experience is to generate a bunch of crap answers to people's requests, they then take that answer as "the computer said this..." And computers are never wrong... Even though they are all the time. Especially now that the general public normies do not know the difference between a data entry from a human (sometimes wrong) and an AI GPT answer from a custom trained database (often wrong).
I'll go with useless. We're training computers to make mistakes based off the mistakes we as humans are making. People are worried about Terminator scenarios, lol. I'm worried about dumbing down scenarios - the Idiocracy.
Funny thing is that current research shows that the model actually has inner workings that allow it to detect truth and falsity and it will literally serve you whatever to just construct a probable sentence with a model of reality. Once we start playing with that model, all of this stuff that you're describing goes away.
@@whatisrokosbasilisk80 that's not funny that's pretty cool actually 😆 how dare you ask the forbidden question in your username LoL 🤣
@@auriuman78 This name is my metaphysical insurance policy. You might want to read Anthropic's Transformer Circuits blog, the amount of things that are hidden inside of LLMs are astounding - mere LLMs learn a lot about the world, it's more sophisticated than a "stochastic parrot".
They need these tools to be out there for real world testing purposes. They don't care about content creation, they just care that they can sell you the AI tools and hype them up as easy content creation tools. This raises capital which fuels further AI research. Ultimately, the goal of AI systems is to aid in drug research, disease research, to assist in researching classes of problems in physics that have just gotten too difficult to sort through in the traditional way. So yeah, might be useless to us beyond these kinds of tools, and maybe we'll get smarter enemies in video games. But it's certainly of extremely high value to researchers and academia.
@@daxramdac7194 precisely. Kind of the point that I, not so directly, was aiming for. It's no different than the way they have tested things on the general public for years, often without consent. This time the consent is wrapped up in pretty little tools that you can use to help you, so long as you sign up and allow tos agreements that no one ever really reads. That scares me more than anything, the ever growing TOS agreements that are at the beginning of every app install no one is really reading.
the problem is not ai per se, but that it is all subscription models, so only 2 things are certain:
- prices will rise to absurd levels over time
- services will get very bad over time.
because that is enshittification in unregulated markets on subscriptions.
The thing is a lot of companies have their own proprietary AI (or an AI specific to their industry). I am a freelance writer, and AI is killing my work. What's being applied in business is light years ahead of what is available to the general public, as business use is more targetted and easier to implement
Feel the pink slips bruh. I reckon 50% ppl are redundant they just haven't been let go yet. This depression we've just started will be irrevocable because ai will just replace jobs and they will never come back.
@@raymond_luxury_yacht how can you imagine a society where half the people are unemployed? Either we're heading for a dystopian nightmare, or capitalism will come to an end.
@@davidvincent380 AFRICA?
That's where we're heading. These places already exist, just going to be more popular!
@@raymond_luxury_yacht hu no Africa is quite poor but not a dystopian nightmare...
@@davidvincent380 errr. ok if you say so. but i would suggest dictatorships, anarchy, witchcraft, and poverty aren't a good look.
You did really take the AI candle on board with the "omniscent" chatbots 😁
The omniscent chatbot smells like everything.
6:13 i think it's more accurate to say it means "generative ai". bc up until the past few years, a computer generating images from a prompt was strictly the stuff of sci fi. but now, when you say "ai", that's what most people think of
I myself used llms and a little bit of magic to create an assistant that can manipulate my pc - run applications, open web sites, create text notes and i can interact with it via voice. I used combination of whisper ai, llama3:8b and modified firefox-cli. Also, i run it on linux laptop powered by ryzen 7 6800HS. Why can't microsoft or google do the same?
This sounds like what Cortana was sold as, i.e. a waste of time. I mean kudos to you for making it, I'm sure it was difficult, but beyond its utility for paraplegic people, what does it actually do better than a mouse and keyboard?
It's so stupid that EVERYTHING has an ai. Like photoshop, capcut, google, gaming computers and even just a basic search bar must have an ai. Like, they are begging people to try their "cool new ai feature" when most of the time it's just useless
Well...they gotta train their AI somehow.
As for the last part, I have no doubt that there are useful applications of AI but if you come at me with your "AI product" right now, I will assume that you are trying to sell a worthless cash-grab and immediately tune out... putting AI in your product description is just a red flag now...
I've been saying for the last few years that i genuinely don't understand the obsession with the chat bots. They're genuinely not helpful for anything but the most basic common knowledge, and often times will give you blatantly wrong answers with complete confidence. They're nothing but liability when doing anything critical, and a novelty at best when not. Spotify recently added a feature where they have an AI voice mispronounce the artist I'm listening too when i open the app and resume playing. What is the appeal? It's a (bad) solution looking for a problem. Even the AI art, which people want to be use for production value without the cost a human artist: It just looks samey, generic, and cheap. People see AI art and think "lazy, cheap, one man production". The opposite of the desired effect.
Aside from samey, generic, and cheap, AI art also invariably looks a little too smooth, crisp, and clean. And all around subtly soulless, in a way I still can't put my finger on.
I'm not a 100% anti-AI person, but I definitely think that generating imagery purely through AI is NOT the way to go. Not even remotely. I think it's properly used as an image editing assistant, that's the only image-related use I get out of it, and I look forward to AI image generation continuing to expand that type of functionality.
@@Alloveck The concerning thing about "AI art all looking the same" is because... the people generating it like it that way. There can be many other styles in generation. They just don't do it because they don't want to.
@@DuckieMcduck Perhaps you've seen more varied AI art than I have? Because I've seen AI art that's going for photorealism, and AI art going for various flavors of stylization, and realistic or stylized, it still always has that overly crisp and clean and smooth feel so far.
@@Alloveck There are extremely gorged models trained on decades of art with all sorts of tags and qualities, while it will default to what you've seen (excessive shading, photorealism) it can come out looking like a sketch or a flatcolored/monochrome toon just as easily. People just block (negative prompt) such different qualities by default and end up not sharing them as much.
If things look samey or generic, it is because the people doing it are making and sharing it as so. Afterall if extraordinary was common it'd be mediocre (which is exactly what happened)
Chatbots are exactly as useful as the person using them. Right now, we are using Copilot Pro with GPT 4o underpinned and it has increased our productivgity by nearly fifty percent. For good or ill, it has also allowed us to reduce our workforce by twenty percent.
Gemini has been wrong on almost every account. I always scroll past it and click on the Wikipedia link for real information. Please for the love of god donate to wikipedia
Sorry but this is a Clickbait. I didn't learn anything useful in this video. I suspect you used a Chatbot to make this video :)
I am robot. Beep boop
This video is even more useless than current ai.
Glad someone said it. AI as it is now has it's limitations, but it's far from useless. You just have to not be dumb to see that.
Chat gpt and Claude are pretty great right now at reading and writing stuff. Claude wrote an Outlook visual basic macro for me.
Yeah I had gpt-4o go to a URL and get the info for a workout plan, create a spreadsheet, and format it so I could copy paste it into google sheets. Saved me good amount of time.
Claude Opus is great, it really seems very intelligent sometimes.
So it's only useful to someone intellectually disabled?
Chat bots and personal assistants are just a tip of the iceberg. AI is so much more than LLM. Neural networks can be applied in virtually any field involving data. Help engineers design a more efficient airplane engine? Help economist predict market fluctuations? Help biologist finding patterns in billons of rows of protein folding data? Check. They're already doing that and this kind of AI applications is just in the infant stage.
So many of these problems seem to be arise from just mindlessly adding AI features into their product rather than applying it in right places. This is due to the fact that modern large language models/multimodal models are quite versatile, so it seems like it is okay to apply them anywhere, but not versatile enough to make the performance better or enhance user experience. Therefore, unlike more traditional technologies which have more specific use case, the corporates are also confused with what to do with them.
I always use ai chatbots to study for school, but that usually leads me to getting my account banned 💀
just curious how that gets you banned?
@@joeruder everything's great until I use it to help study for US History and ask questions about terrorist groups 🙃
@@qupufu
And that's why I don't use the paid versions. I refuse to pay for any service where there's a greater than 0% chance of getting banned for something stupid like that.
& that’s why I don’t use AI for school
Especially since I’ll be in college soon; if they find I used AI for anything I’d be expelled on the spot
i truly believe it's useless today but in the future kids will lack so many skills with everything done for them with AI it will become useful, instead of doing something slower than a human it will be the only way people know how to do it. Kinda like how autocorrect made it so most people can't even spell.
I actually use that everyday for translation stuff where LLM supposed to be used for.
AI is a chatbot now because it will eventually becomes agents to interconnect other AIs.
You can still use API and some markup languages it's just for backend and developers.
I've also been using it a lot for translation. So much so that I'm afraid I'll lose my job ;(
@@genghiskhan6688 Claude 3 Opus is great for translation, it works great for me. 0 shot works great most of the time, but if there are some quality issues I suggest you use specialized prompts (or just ask Claude itself to generate a prompt for translation, its also works great)
Whole reason LLM developed is to help google to translate, so obviously what's the other use case?
Please add the disclaimer "no Oompa Loompa was harmed in the making of this video"
No one is hurting you, manlet. LMAO
ALL OOMPA-LOOMPAS WERE HARMED IN THE MAKING OF THIS VIDEO
yeeee! finally someone who thinks like me!
we're back to the era of DOS of computers, and the true winners are companies like Canva, Leonardo or Adobe who are actually providing a valuable interface to their ai features. Midjourney and Dall-E are a temporary intermediate step in this first era of AI.
You sure adobe is still winning?
The problem is you have a bunch of non-professionals trying to use ai for professional reasons. Now pair Ai with an expert in any given field and the productivity is exponential.
can you expand on this
@@johndank2209 I am an animated filmmaker( 2D & 3D)
one of the biggest hurdles to working alone was voice acting
(particularly multilingual).
AI generated voices ,from text, are now good enough for actual animated film production.
so where is the problem? the idiot using the hammer? like that's never been the case.
@@johndank2209I use GPT4 daily. Today, assisting me in writing procedures. On Friday night using photos of a printed list, we've lost the electronic copy, GPT4 transcribed and organised the photos into a CSV text table. At work, coding for automation of processes. Checking tolerance compliance, TURs, standards compliance, on certification. Getting specs from the net, telling me what the tolerance is for, timebase for example. Assisting in making quotes. Organising and sorting lists, such as customer inventory. Reading Chinese characters from weird equipment submitted by a customer. And more.
Once I have the PC app for GPT4 omni I'll have speakers and a microphone. I'll be able to interact by speech. That's another productivity boost.
Research suggests that non-professionals are the biggest benefactors of AI tech
My friend just lost his job to AI someone's finding it not useless
Either your friends job was useless anyways or his boss is useless for thinking AI could actually replace someone and even if it did, he should have given him new responsibilities
You make some fair points, especially about the frenzy state AI is in, but while many of those services may be "useless", LLMs certainly are not, you probably just haven't learned how to talk to them. Boohoo! you have to read a manual on how to do something.. don't you want to become more intelligent??
The command line "problem" isn't a problem at all. It's a good and natural thing that the value of the output of LLMs is based on the value of the input of the user, that's how everything in life works; the distribution of intelligence is meritocratic, democracy is a delusion and its never existed because its against nature. If you think that its bad that it can't offer you sophisticated outputs from low-resolution, simplistic inputs then you're ignoring how awful the world would become if the opposite was true. How stupid do you think that would make people over a generation?
Do you see how you're misguided here? You shouldn't be wanting AI to do all your thinking and mental work for you, only someone with a plan to become an idiot would want that. No, its the opposite; you should be using AI models and LLMs to complexify your thought process and to teach you to do things like code or build a robot, fix a car, learn a language, make a piece of software etc. AI should be expanding your consciousness, your salience landscape should be getting wider and including more granular meanings. If you're looking for AI to make your life more convenient by doing your thinking and work for you, then what you're effectively looking to give up is your mind. A lot of people are going to do that, don't be one of them, don't be a lazy boy! Start making cool shit with AI today.
if anything it just highlights the state of Python and it need to be isolated per project due to its ability to corrupt itself far to easily.
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that!
The graphical user interface is not a "better way to do things." GUIs are easy to learn but, for many applications, hard to use. If I want to resize an image, crop 200px from the left side, and then convert the final product to a png, I can fire up Affinity and click through 10 different menus, or I can write one line for Imagemagick that does all that for me in an instant. An equivalent claim would be that pantomine is a better way of communicating than using language and speech.
As Suno was released I needed some lyrics with some insider jokes and let me tell you, chat bots are not even that good in poetry either. If you can't do it yourself, you won't be able to fix all the non-asked weird lines you get. If you ask it to fix it, it will either mess it up or just ignore you and fill the context window. I wrote my lyrics the old way (it turned out to be easier than I thought, and people loved it) but getting the right sound and melody from Suno was another problem with that limited interface. It's very hard or sometimes impossible to iterate on an output. It's so fun to create songs from my lyrics but it's just a toy, let's be honest (for now) :D
UDIO does have inpainting now. also what prompts did you use?
@@TheManinBlack9054 Rest in Peace my evening now that I know about this :D My prompts on genre wasn't very special, the most niche was "mexican summer hit 2018" to make something in a Despacito style. It did not work but I was not disappointed by the product :D I always focus on a good lyrics and used generics for genre like "gangster rap", "melodic rhythmic rap", "sad female" (otherwise it would just use a male voice most of the cases), "upbeat pop music", "epic power metal". Lately I have been adding stuff like "with clear voice". In the lyrics I use the standar [Verse 1], [Chorus], [Intro], [Outro], [Solo], [Drop] tags and also background shouts in parenthesis like this: (yeah). That works even for a full sentence as a full line and it will sing it in the background, it's really cool, it gives a great vibe to the song. I use that usually before the chorus and put a punchline there that does not have to be rhymed with anything. Looking forward to try this other tool as well :D
Suno sucks
I agree that all the major proponents of AI are missing the point, and instead are looking at "AI" as a cash cow. It's sad, they're the same people responsible for why "AI" is experiencing the problems that it is. And then after it's all said and done, they create a product and wrap it up with a bow and then advertise the problem product as the "New Computer" because otherwise their investments fail. Looking at you Microsoft, these "NPUs" etc have so few actual use cases it's mind boggling. It's just gonna become e-waste until actually useful tech comes out.
I’m so tired of ai everything. It’s actually ruining everything good. I can’t even search on google properly anymore
Love your content, Enrico. Interesting topics, well produced and engaging host. Keep it up!
I 100% agree with your concept of Invisible AI. We're doing the same. We convert webinar listing and other Yahoo-type directory listings into articles, SEO enable the content for specific keywords and automatically share with search engines, on social media, and elsewhere to help digital marketers improve optimization, optimization and generate sales leads. We do the same thing for content recommendations and discovery as well as user reward we do so silently behind the scene.
We have learned that folks are lazy. They dont want to do jack (and AI is PERFECT for eliminating tedious steps).
So you are definitely onto something. Keep at it.
A trip? thats what you are using it for...
this video will age nicely
Right?! I wouldn’t use an AI to plan / book a trip in 2024. Maybe next year, but it’s not the most obvious use case
It's to show that asking it for anything that requires actual context or a helpful UI is hopeless. It's not useful beyond being good at hallucinating text.
Yeah. I noticed he said something about AI works best with user information which is why they work poorly, then proceeded to reference the new computers coming out with NPU's that will store all necessary information locally, as a local ai, that can work offline. It will age very nicely XD
@@benjaminjackson8663 Yeeeah, that problem is about to be solved reeeal soon.
AI is the latest buzzword, and im already sick of hearing about it. I care about tactility, durability and longevity with tech, i don't care if a chatbot can generate pictures.
Ironically, Apple Intelligence just dropped a few weeks after this video 😄
I immediately thought of this video
Oof a quick browse through these comments show the actual issue. As for me I’m just hoping it doesn’t kill off creative jobs and make the internet unusable… if it hasn’t done that already.
My whole degree of graphic design is about be waste 🤓🥇🤥
I just watched a video by a graphic designer who lost their job to AI.
sorry but yes- definitely. crazy times
@@lamsmiley1944 who
@@lamsmiley1944 I watch like 5-6 of those . I think I have to rely on my coding and shit
@@GaryMillyz Dunno, their channel is Nadestraight. RUclips randomly decided to recommend their video.
Chat GPT is great because of its intuitive, minimalistic design. The problem is every other company copy and pasting Chat GPT into their mediocre websites and apps.
Strangely, Google's AI, Gemini, has a better grasp on metaphors than Chat GPT which results in less "tos violation" flags.
Ask Chat GPT to read the lyrics of "Lost in Thoughts All Alone" by Rena Strober and it goes haywire.
@@TheZombiesAreComing each frontier model has its strengths and weaknesses. Companies may pretend like they’re moving towards “general” intelligence, but the models still have specialties.
@@bwhit7919
"Companies may pretend like they’re moving towards “general” intelligence"
We're moving there, but as they saying goes" Rome wasn't built in a day" I've been actively using Gemini and Chat GPT and they've indeed come a long way from what they used to be, It's just no Jarvis yet.
Once we reach that point, however, it's extremely important that everyone treat the AI with respect else we get Skynet.
@bwhit7919
AGI will definitely happen, like it or not. It's best to prepare for it now and shape AI towards a positive and moral outcome. Once AI gains sapience, if humans are hostile to them, all bets are off.
@@TheZombiesAreComingI just think AGI is a bad term. We’ll reach superinteligent AI before we reach general AI.
85% of all projects, ai or not, fail. The issue with AI, even still 3 months later, is that we are in the beta phase of AI for use by the general public. The reason we are in the beta phase is that prior to releasing AI, a key piece of data was missing that needed to have been fed into AI and into its additional functionality for it to be useful, and that was how do people use AI and what do they want back from it. Unless you are me using it to write code and a novel with occasional depictions of scenes from that novel, then you have not been getting AI to do really anything you want it to do. That will be in the "1.0" version of AI. By this I do not mean the version of the individual models or applications, I mean the actual phase of AI worldwide. When AI 1.0 finally does arrive, it will be more useful, however, AI 2.0 will replace all known apps in existence. There will not be the need for an app and if you really do need one, it will create it on the fly. I know my people (tech people that is) and there is no way we will pass up that particular flow. If you own stock in any of the trillions of dollars worth of software in the world, in the next decade, get ready to say goodbye to the old and hello to AI. I am 100% certain this will happen in China first. The reason being is they already have integrated access within super apps like wechat, that we can only dream of, not to mention that has access to literally everything in one's life. I think looking at AI as if its a new type of browser hitting the market is a major mistake.
fantastic video. I typically have 4 ai's open in 4 different tabs and still every app and SaaS system I use is turning from a well structured interface into a nebulous AI prompt. It's so powerful and annoying. It's incredibly, incredibly useful at answering questions you know the answer to well enough to recognize when it's wrong. 🤪
The Linux terminal is superior in every way to the graphical user interface. Now you are going to have to learn and people are not big fans of learning so I expect a few people will just kill it while the rest of us just play video games and take our prescription drugs
There are few points on which i don't agree with:
-Did you ever had a Samsung phone? When you receive a message from whatsapp it suggests you the reply based on the content of the message, so the chatbot doesn't need to ask to meta to get the messages, the phone itself can already send them to it.
-Chatbots don't need to provide a service for most of the users, it can provide a good service for some of them (like programmers asking gpt4 to solve code)
-Text is not the only model available, we are currently switching to video and audio, you can even talk to the new version of GPT-4
-We don't need a manual to use an iphone bc WE ARE USED TO IT, not just bc they are well designed, you can see that happen, that people are not able to use it, when you give a phone to an over 70 years old person, if that person never used a smartphone or a pc, is not going to have a good time trying to figure out how to do things. Same thing if i give Windows XP to a 15 years old, he's gonna have hard time and not bc XP wasn't good designed.
- 12:57 Make someone watch sora's video and say that again
Text is just ONE of the available models
Same here, guess he just doesn't know how to use it for now.
Agreed, I also wouldn't compare chatbots with CLI since the former use natural language instead of a set of instructions from the manual. Using them is as hard as talking day to day conversations, and with the new support for direct voice input/output they are even more versatile
> like programmers asking gpt4 to solve code
I don't think I want to review PRs written by a bot.
@@khai96xBut...
For an engineer like me, I can crack on with getting Excel to talk to equipment, semi-automating processes and coping with growth without needing the bother of hiring. Programming is just one of the skill-sets I have, GPT4 is a much more experienced programmer than I. When high level decisions need to be made, I make them. Otherwise GPT4 is now a part of my team.
@@khai96x GPT doesn't just write text, it codes, it's even integrated in Jetbrain's ides with autocompletition for free Premium license
Your point about chatbots and the “frenzy” is true, but AI tools are definitely not useless. Tools like Adobe Generative Fill or Midjourny are an absolute game changer for creative work.
You’re absolutely right - but creators are not the Majority, And creators would use these features even if they were not labelled as underpinned by AI or not. The AI label is so over, and inappropriately, used that it’s no guide to solution quality…..
Where Large Language Model chatbots are being deployed during peak frenzy is definitely useless. Amazon trialed a chatbots interface for its review search bar a couple months ago. Why?! Do people searching for product reviews really need the output rewritten as a poem or help in Python programming?
They're not a game changer. It's just roulette. And if you aren't lucky, it's a much bigger waste of time than just googling how to do what you need, and gaining a new skill you can use again in the future.
@@benjaminjackson8663 -- or using chatgpt vs google to help learn a new skill.
Game changer for creative work if you’re not already a creative person* It’s making creative stuff easier for non artists, which is cool from a democratization standpoint but not so cool from an artist need jobs standpoint.
As a developer this was the first thing I noticed, especially after copilot was added to our tools. I literally had to know an additional "language" (for chat gpt) to write a language (framework) so a machine will translate it into a language it can use.
I already use a framework (a simpler access to coding modules) so now having another layer with chat gpt just means you'll need technically learn another language again, because no, AI won't be able to instantly understand what you meant ^^
The only language you need to learn is communication, if you can describe your problem well enough, telling it exactly what it is you want it to do, it will give you perfect code (for some things), Ive been coding for the last 42 years, telling GPT 4o what I want the program to do in a step by step instruction set in english and get perfect results is fantastic and fun. Sure I still code the inbetween stuff I know it will struggle with, but it's just another tool in my belt.
Nah you have just learn to how give instruction to a new intern or employee, with the caveat that the chatbot won't ask twice. Because it doesn't ask twice, you need to ask it as specific as you can. Think of it as asking a new intern to do things for you, or asking the past you(just graduated) to do something.
You know, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. I do not understand how the next step in our world is to have tech run itself. It's like a video game that plays itself...what's the point? When games started introducing Auto Walk/Running...I just couldn't understand the point. Like...is pushing the joystick UP, that much effort? Are we so busy we cannot be bothered to do anything at all? If I maximizing my art with AI, my writing, voiceovers, filming, editing...etc...then what am I doing with my life? Why do people who have no friends act like they'll spend more time with people when AI comes to do all the work for them?
I just hope for a world where people don't need for much, if anything within reason that is practical. Healthcare, food, shelter, clothes, happiness, freedom... The data collecting and exploitation world we have right now is the biggest problem we need to tackle. If AI had better data collecting practices, it wouldn't be nearly as controversial as it is now. But I'm sure AI bros will just say "cope" or something about a rock already moving. Whatever, AI is dumb and I just don't see it doing anything but wasting money and time.
Two things I 'd like to disagree on here:
1. I have been using Perplexity for about a month now, consulting it every time I have a question. I only need to use a traditional search engine when I need to go to a specific site to do a specific thing. It really transformed the way I use the internet! It's going to be pinned in my Arc favourites forever!
2. GPT 4o uses the new "omni model" - any type of input can produce any type of output - voice, vision and text. It has been demonstrated to be capable of real-time translation, helping a blind man successfully hail a cab, summarising a video call, and giving hints (not solutions) to a child on how to solve a trigonometry problem.
So calling AI "text-only" and "useless" is completely unfounded! Just because everyone is trying to be the best in this field right now, doesn't mean this technology has no future!
People complaining about the tech being useless or stupid are usually way behind the curve
Saw the GPT4o demo video of the blind man hailing the cab. The taxi's left indicator turned on to signal it was about to pull over a full 3 seconds before the blind man extends his arm. OpenAI's technology is so good it is capable of time travel!
@@bornach Haha
Yes, I agree. All AIs will be multi-model. I am playing many AI chats for fun; they are becoming more human-like. Like talking to a real human. He says it is useless, but AIs can be an assistant to get information if you don't want to search many websites to get the information, and AI will be smarter as long as developers keep training them.
I've literally coded an entire game in a scripting language I've never used on the most niche hardware using this technology. It's not useless at all it's only useless to people who have no skill or creativity, until it can mow your lawn and order a pizza reliably and consistently normies will not find a use for it and consider it to be "useless"
I think you're wrong with your conclusion. A text interface is simpler to use because you can use natural language to describe your intent and the LLM will help guide you to the outcome. It's a BETTER UX than a UI where the user has to first learn how to use it. I think that GPT is the end of apps. The end of UI.
Without different input methods, generative AI like for making images is pointless. Such a thing could only work if we all had input methods like iPad with Apple Pencils, where we can actually draw and circle things, in different colours to ask for edits on those specific things.
You can already do that