Sig X-Macro vs Glock 19. Does Sig Have The New Do It All Gun?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @RepentorPerish77
    @RepentorPerish77 3 месяца назад +2

    The P365 Legion is the BEST concealed carry pistol I have ever owned…very reliable, thin, perfect size, and manages recoil very well!! And it looks great!!

  • @q4life551
    @q4life551 Месяц назад +2

    Innovation is paying off for sig

  • @MrPerry61
    @MrPerry61 3 месяца назад +2

    The Macro is my current edc. I just got in the 365 Fuse. There's a lot of reviews about them having FTF issues, but after 150 rnds there hasn't been one failure with mine. I like the fiber optic front sight but its "grabby" going into and out of some holsters because of the sharp edges. I'm in NW Ark.

    • @TheArkansasGunGuy
      @TheArkansasGunGuy  2 месяца назад

      Mine has been 100% accurate - over 500 rounds through so far. Love it the more I shoot it! Thanks for watching!!

  • @omens_slays
    @omens_slays 3 месяца назад +1

    Can't go wrong with either. The X Macro is just too thin in the grip and my support hand can't get a solid placement. For those with smaller hands it's probably perfect.

    • @jlinka79
      @jlinka79 2 месяца назад

      I still prefer my 26 over any slimline Sig, even if I can’t get a legit wml for my 26

  • @Watermelonsandguns
    @Watermelonsandguns 3 месяца назад

    I put the fuse slide on my legion frame, it’s niiiiice.

  • @Joseph-sw5xm
    @Joseph-sw5xm 3 месяца назад

    The XL with extended mags also holds 17 plus 1 and is even thinner than the macro. It’s all about how much you want to compromise in size, weight and capacity

  • @calvingillen9682
    @calvingillen9682 Месяц назад +1

    Sigg all day

  • @allenmcdonald1652
    @allenmcdonald1652 3 месяца назад

    I’m very familiar with Glock 19 as I own 2. I am also very familiar with the P365 original and XL. Not at all with the MACRO. The g19 is definitely less refined and as “wrangler star” says they don’t give you “the fizz” the way that Sig does, but they are accurate and virtually indestructible. My only real negative about the g19 is the thickness of the grip is so much more that it feels less stable in my hand and makes hitting the mag release impossible without shifting my grip. I have size large hands with shortish fingers. You mentioned the macro is taller from bottom of grip to top of slide. What is that height difference? I have found that dimension is critical to printing when carrying at the 4-5 o’clock position.

  • @ericg649
    @ericg649 3 месяца назад +1

    Is the Sig rail still proprietary??

    • @TheArkansasGunGuy
      @TheArkansasGunGuy  3 месяца назад

      It’s not! The old 365’s were but the Macro has standard pic rail. Thanks so much for watching!!!

  • @ghostfitness5605
    @ghostfitness5605 16 дней назад

    Macro is destroying the Glock 19 I have both and it’s not close

  • @RichiesHouse
    @RichiesHouse 3 месяца назад +1

    To different platforms . Ones a duty pistol based of 17 . The 365 is easier to carry but full size duty guns can go higher round count . But most people aren’t going to shoot 10,000 rds so sig did hit a sweet spot of control of a bigger pistol but keeping it thin . I get it . For me though I do not like modern sig designs like 365 and 320 . I enjoyed sig at 226 and 220 models. But always shoot and buy what you like

    • @TheArkansasGunGuy
      @TheArkansasGunGuy  3 месяца назад

      Excellent feedback!! Thanks for sharing / and for watching!!! Very much appreciated!!

  • @kyliejohn3813
    @kyliejohn3813 3 месяца назад +1

    Glocks have never appealed to me since they’re pretty blaaaa looking. Cheap, reliable and well-served by the after-market, sure, but it will not win any beauty pageants. A former Fed shooting partner has several that I’ve shot, but they just don’t do anything for me personally.

    • @rudrashakti108
      @rudrashakti108 3 месяца назад

      They are not reliable. They have been sued countless times
      By law enforcement in the 90’s and 2000’s and still today they jam a lot with police who have to do tap rack bangs. I think it’s marketing that brainwashes people, and that they’re extremely cheap for law enforcement. No other gun can compete price wise. So they are used heavily by agencies and then people want to believe they must be reliable otherwise why else world the agency have bought it.

  • @ghostfitness5605
    @ghostfitness5605 3 месяца назад +1

    I’m the first here 😂😂😂