For extremely close range engagements, it's good to switch to your auxiliary sight by pressing C. It's situated closer than the gun than the primary sight, so you'll be able to tell if your gun has cleared the berm in front of you-that way you won't send a round into the dirt instead of hitting your target.
Loved the GAS engagements during Table VI. Been Distinguished and my best ever gunnery score was 979/1000. Dropped a partial engagement when my loader had a failure to feed during the Simultaneous engagement.
Imagine being the T-72s at the start. No contacts, just cruising along, then suddenly your buddy to the left just evaporates. If there is a way to lower the enemy's morale, that's gotta be it.
that's just what happens when you have to push into a defended position across an open expanse, you're going to take losses no matter how well you've trained or prepared for the scenario and indeed your entire vehicle and doctrine is designed around *you* and *your* other MBT buddies to take the brunt of the enemy defensive fire. The same would absolutely be true if the T-72s were parked in defilade on a ridge and the M1s had to shift it across a valley to push a position the commander ordered had to be neutralized.
Fun fact if you have a HOTAS you can bind that to your turret, definitely helps with immersion. I use virtual desktop streamer with my Vr headset so it looks like I’m looking around as well :D
That’s a great idea. As someone who doesn’t have a pc yet but plans to buy one as well as controls and vr setup to play dcs, Ill def also take this idea so any games I play are as realistic as possible. Great idea mate!
The M60 wasn't even a great tank (I know people will debate this and disagree) but I love the way it looks, it just looks tough and menacing, aesthetically it's one of my favorites.
@@liquid880 Lets be real the m60 was more of a fire support weapon in the gulf war, while M1 did all the anti tank work. In that sense a Panzer 3 or StuG could have done what the m60 did. Now there is the case of the Marine push on the airport where numerous tanks were destroyed including T-72. The M-60, even as old as it was, was significantly more sophisticated in optics, laser rang finding thermals etc. than anything Iraq had. Yet what Iraq had wasn't even in the same ballpark as much older Soviet armor. These export model T-72 had none of the computerization, optics or even armor of modern Russian/Soviet armor. They essentially operated like a Tank right out of WW2, glass optics, manual aiming, in a more modern package with a autoloader. They were better than using a T-34-85 but only just. This led to a overinflated comparison between soviet/Russian armor and American armor superiority. While if Iraq was operating state of the art T-80 or T-72 with all the modern upgrades they would have held a massive advantage over the M-60s. The technology bolted onto the M-60 made all the difference, more than the tank itself. It would have been just as lopsided for instance if Iraq had modernized T-72 and the us was using Vietnam era M60.
That's how I always recommend doing it too. It especially makes sense with the gen 1 thermals here, to get positive ID on the hot spot in day sight before you fire.
Played the original Steel Beasts game alot as a kid. I remember when lasing a target in the M1A1 and the target reticle "drifting" so to speak and then having to "dump" the laze if you missed and the target was moving. Didn't see that here. Also it seems HEAT rounds travel the same speed as Sabot rounds but I could be mistaken. Game looks great though in any case.
you can see the HEAT rounds have to travel way higher and lead a lot further than APFSDS rounds when he was still sniping at the start of the video, look at about 4:53, first round is APFSDS next is HEAT
It seems to me that the vehicles in this game are early 1980s we’re the M-1 had a 105mm instead of a 120mm smooth bore and the Bradley’s look like M-2 basic or maybe an A1. Over all this game gives me some serious flash backs to Reforger.
I actually love your Gunner Heat PC vids with the older M1 Abrams. But sometime in the future could you do another IL-2 Tank Crew video. Anyway keep up the great work :)
@@-Zevin- unfortunately we will not be seeing the t80 BV in this theater as it didn't really exist yet as the theater were in his fulda gap in 1985 however we will see the T80B
Man watching this really makes me wish for a combat simulator that has all the aspects of this game, men of war, ruse, and hearts of iron 4 all in one! if it could go from romans to the future too thatd be one hell of a game! despite my hopes and dreams, awesome video!
@@xmlthegreat idk man, sooner or later I feel like its gonna happen, either using existing engines/software or skins/textures/models, id say its definitely gonna happen eventually, just who knows if its in our time lol
I disagree that the AI is non threatening. You're only gonna see the best runs Wolfpack has in his videos but if you're playing mission after mission you can quickly get wrecked by enemies in good positions. In particular, playing as the Soviets going against the M2 and M1 combo'd up is practically suicide.
You forget that you can't repair and heal the crew like war thunder. So if you get shot. It's a threatening situation. And the crew can't compensate each other work. If driver dies. He dies. And your tank will be immobilized for the rest of that mission. If loader dies. Your tank can't reload for the rest of the mission. If gunner dies. You can't shoot. If commander die. No one will call out the enemy position.
@Demon im thinking soviet vehicles will have a better dart round that can penetrate abrams more easily. I doubt they have anything with good armor against 105mm
@Demon i dont think T64B is being added, the only T64 currently WIP is the T64A. But yes i agree BMP2 will be very fun and will give bradleys a run for their money.
Looking forward to this games development, bought it last night because of your vids! Hope its popularity blows up and we get years worth of updates to the game!
When I first got the game, I only played the T-55 to get used to the controls, switching over the play the Abrams felt like I got cheat codes. The fire control system is insane, still I love the my T-55.
I feel the one thing this lacks is a driver view. Although a bit limited compared to the turret positions - it would help me keep my bearings, and is important for reference to know if you're hull down or properly cresting a hill.
That little BRDM I think it was at 6:00 while you were "restocking" the main gun, why didn't you light it up with the .50? You were close enough and a M2 would likely have turned it into swiss cheese
Do the T-72's snorkel under water obstacle and BMP's swim across in this game bypassing the M-1's who then have to look for their fuel trucks, fill up and then try and catch them? Or do they always just charge like idiots into the guns in a circle jerk? Operation Bagration 1944 the German Wehrmacht got which Army Group was going to get the summer offensive wrong.
The real drawback of the Russian T72 T80 T90 tanks is gravity, in the sense that the Russian tanks are accurate in the firing of their cannon up to 1000 meters then gravity wins and their firing becomes inaccurate, while the firing of all western tanks is accurate up to 3000 meters having superior technology to Russian tanks, plus many other things including the ability to take shots Western infantry support is also vastly superior to the Russians, having superior armor to that of the Muscovites and having missiles capable of precisely attacking Russian tanks
Love the M60s. Was just looking at one today as I drove past a neighboring towns VFW Hall display. I was wondering if it's engine could still fire up, like those old Russian T72s from long ago still do.
Hi Wolf! Great video. Is it possible for you to increase your field of view? When you were backing away from the hillside near the beginning after being surprised by the T-55, it seemed as though you really couldn't see very far towards your peripheral. I don't believe you were using optics, but I may be mistaken. Thanks for posting this! P.S. if GHPC can ever be modded, I'd love to see WW1 tanks really done well here.
Great game, but It is a pity that the real combined arms combat is not implemented in the game (yet?). For the M1, it’s more likely that not the T-72s will go, but the KA-52s will arrive. In modern combat, it is rare that tanks simply oppose each other, without aviation support. Aircraft/artillery/infantry are controlled by AI and players control tanks. Then the game would be most realistic.
Ai doing literally nothing. You can pick any vehicle and kill everything as they are standing or moving straight. inputs are very clunky in this game btw
It's painful. The older ammo the DDR gets doesn't go through the any part of the M1's front except at very close range, and even shots that do get inside rarely prevent it from shooting back.
Where's the smoke? When you back away from your hull down firing position with Red tanks in close, POP SMOKE. You can see them and they can't see you. You can get off another shot while moving to your backup position. I can't understand the lack of smoke in the tutorials.
interesting game, like the old M1 Tank Platoon but more user friendly....dude make a Challenger 1 in game or a Chieftain and you get a costumer! (well, put the Leo 1 and Leo 2 too to gain more crowd)
It sure makes quite obvious that the Abrams and likely the leopard a2 wil just …tear thru any Russian armour in Ukraine. * if the crews are properly trained*
Сомневаюсь, что с них будет много толку. Леопард и абрамс машины не плохие, но советские танки они броней и пушкой не превосходили. Плюсами западных танков являлись система управления огнем и приборы наблюдения, в остальном танки СССР не хуже. Танки на Украине редко воюют с танками, в основном танки уничтожает либо артиллерия и авиация, либо человек с гранатомётом. Советский танк в этом отношении лучше, во первых он ниже, и соответственно в него тяжелее попасть, во вторых они покрыты динамической защитой, которая действительно спасает от кумулятивных боеприпасов, если же по советскому танку стреляет артиллерия, то опять же шансов больше, по той причине, что броня толще в бортах в несколько раз чем у западных ( на т72 на сколько помню 80мм, на леопарде вроде 20-40мм). А если возвращаться к вопросу кто кого пробьет, то не забывайте про фугасные боеприпасы на танки СССР, им даже леопард пробивать не нужно, попадание снаряда с 5кг взрывчатки с большей долей вероятности выводит танк из строя. Так же основной боеприпас 3БМ42 " манго", должен пробивать леопард в лоб башни, практически куда угодно, но в защиту могу сказать, что и российским танкам будет в таких боях не легко. В целом я считаю, что ничего хорошего западные танки на Украине не ждёт, хотя бы из за логистических проблем, касающихся запчастей и людей кто эти танки будет обслуживать. Возить танки на ремонт в Польшу, довольно долго. А если брать обещанные леопард 1, то это даже не смешно, он и т62м не конкурент. Время покажет
Soviet tank crews aren't trained to fire on the move. Gunner uses the stabilized gun and sight to acquire the target, the driver then short halts for the gunner to fire. Auto reload on the move is not much better than 4 rpm. WP tank gunnery training calls for 30 second engagement sequence, unlike NATO crews, the best of which can get off 10 rpm at close (1000 meter) range targets.
Currently in the game we have the M1 and M1IP we will not see the M1A1 in this theater as it was not available in the fulda gap in 1985 (That's when the game takes place) However once 1.0 is out and they start working another theaters maybe desert Storm or something like that it's very much possible
They say a strong processor is a must ....... I'm not a computer wonk, so is a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10875H CPU @ 2.30GHz 2.30 GHz with RTX 2070 Super on Alienware laptop good for frame rates in this sim ???? I have 32 Gig of ram also..... Thanks guys !!!!! 🙂
This game is pretty realistic. If you shoot and miss at a very close range, backing up and losing the contact temporarily are a good idea. Otherwise, you would be get killed or lose modules pretty fast. It is not matter you drive the best tank or not. Close range shots are dangerous and (mostly) fatal.
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
For extremely close range engagements, it's good to switch to your auxiliary sight by pressing C. It's situated closer than the gun than the primary sight, so you'll be able to tell if your gun has cleared the berm in front of you-that way you won't send a round into the dirt instead of hitting your target.
Loved the GAS engagements during Table VI. Been Distinguished and my best ever gunnery score was 979/1000. Dropped a partial engagement when my loader had a failure to feed during the Simultaneous engagement.
Great idea. Saw a crew shoot the berm at Graf with Sabot. For real, not in a game. Pretty spectacular.
@@johnlove3461 I miss gunnery.
IYKYK!
@@nevash6537 👈🏻 = 🤡🤡🤡
Imagine being the T-72s at the start. No contacts, just cruising along, then suddenly your buddy to the left just evaporates. If there is a way to lower the enemy's morale, that's gotta be it.
Imagine youre smart, impossible
They are bots. And if they were humans, they would not just run around.
@@raketny_hvost They would try to put smoke turn 360º and get hit on the rear. Thats already happened to both Ukranian and Russian mbts.
that's just what happens when you have to push into a defended position across an open expanse, you're going to take losses no matter how well you've trained or prepared for the scenario and indeed your entire vehicle and doctrine is designed around *you* and *your* other MBT buddies to take the brunt of the enemy defensive fire.
The same would absolutely be true if the T-72s were parked in defilade on a ridge and the M1s had to shift it across a valley to push a position the commander ordered had to be neutralized.
@@user-ce4dm6wf6p This happens all the time in war. Perhaps they didn't expect contact in this location.
Fly: accidentally flies in front of the gunners sight
Gunner: TARGET LOST
_"WHERE'D HE GO!?!?"_
*"I could've sworn he was right here"*
M1 vs T72: Looks like this game is about 6 months ahead of real world events.
I hope not.
I mean it happened before during desert storm
@@AAAthreat Russian tanks are about to get fucked up in ukraine :)
@@danielrussell5687 Ok bruv.
@@AAAthreatCANT STOP THE PAIN TRAIN CANT STOP THE PAIN TRAIN
It's always a good day when Wolfpack uploads
Fun fact if you have a HOTAS you can bind that to your turret, definitely helps with immersion. I use virtual desktop streamer with my Vr headset so it looks like I’m looking around as well :D
_write that down WRITE THAT DOWN_
Doesn’t mean I’m good with it tho lol, I kinda suck.
Saved for posterity
@@ProB6MG there’s a guide on steam somewhere but im too lazy to scroll and find it
That’s a great idea. As someone who doesn’t have a pc yet but plans to buy one as well as controls and vr setup to play dcs, Ill def also take this idea so any games I play are as realistic as possible. Great idea mate!
Absolutely loving your GHPC Gameplay.
The M1 is such a beast, but I do have a soft spot for the M60
The M60 wasn't even a great tank (I know people will debate this and disagree) but I love the way it looks, it just looks tough and menacing, aesthetically it's one of my favorites.
@@-Zevin- Not a fan of its massive cupola, but aside from that yeah it’s pretty good
Yeah I do agree it's not a great tank. It just looks mean and tough. That's what's won my heart
@@-Zevin- It wasn't that bad either, It served well in the gulf war at least.
@@liquid880 Lets be real the m60 was more of a fire support weapon in the gulf war, while M1 did all the anti tank work. In that sense a Panzer 3 or StuG could have done what the m60 did.
Now there is the case of the Marine push on the airport where numerous tanks were destroyed including T-72. The M-60, even as old as it was, was significantly more sophisticated in optics, laser rang finding thermals etc. than anything Iraq had. Yet what Iraq had wasn't even in the same ballpark as much older Soviet armor. These export model T-72 had none of the computerization, optics or even armor of modern Russian/Soviet armor. They essentially operated like a Tank right out of WW2, glass optics, manual aiming, in a more modern package with a autoloader. They were better than using a T-34-85 but only just. This led to a overinflated comparison between soviet/Russian armor and American armor superiority. While if Iraq was operating state of the art T-80 or T-72 with all the modern upgrades they would have held a massive advantage over the M-60s. The technology bolted onto the M-60 made all the difference, more than the tank itself. It would have been just as lopsided for instance if Iraq had modernized T-72 and the us was using Vietnam era M60.
As a gunner on the M1. I would flip from thermal to clear. Find with thermal. Kill on clear. Target cease fire!
Good to know!
That's how I always recommend doing it too. It especially makes sense with the gen 1 thermals here, to get positive ID on the hot spot in day sight before you fire.
We would shoot in both. There was a sweet spot where thermal and clear would both be on but you had to toy around with it to find it.
I would have let that one BRDM go after that sick stunt.
God damn the air that little armoured car got!
You should have spared him jsut for that tbh.
Use the .50.
Played the original Steel Beasts game alot as a kid. I remember when lasing a target in the M1A1 and the target reticle "drifting" so to speak and then having to "dump" the laze if you missed and the target was moving. Didn't see that here. Also it seems HEAT rounds travel the same speed as Sabot rounds but I could be mistaken. Game looks great though in any case.
M1 reticle lead drift and different ammo speeds are indeed simulated in GHPC
@@ActionScripter Correct, what explicit features some people think are missing are just updated.
you can see the HEAT rounds have to travel way higher and lead a lot further than APFSDS rounds when he was still sniping at the start of the video, look at about 4:53, first round is APFSDS next is HEAT
That other Abrams crew deserve a round of drinks from you after saving your butt lol
That BRDM leaving the ground. 😂
It seems to me that the vehicles in this game are early 1980s we’re the M-1 had a 105mm instead of a 120mm smooth bore and the Bradley’s look like M-2 basic or maybe an A1. Over all this game gives me some serious flash backs to Reforger.
Shoulda let that little guy at 3:30 get away, gotta admire the effort.
I really should have. I regret my decision now.
I always love gunner heat pc content.
That BRDM went YEET
I really liked the camera work and editing on the intro, it was just a vibe.
Appreciate it!
I actually love your Gunner Heat PC vids with the older M1 Abrams. But sometime in the future could you do another IL-2 Tank Crew video. Anyway keep up the great work :)
Yeah I have been getting back into tank crew actually!
Crew bailing out of burning/damaged vehicles would make this program even more interesting.
Bro who calls a game a program
The vehicle models in this game are eye candy for sure. Better than world of tanks or war thunder.
Would love to see more Soviet Block missions using the T-72 or other soviet tanks.
I'll do more! The T-55 is my favorite tank in the game.
""Get down, Mr. President"-Maneuvre" :D
Cant wait for the T-80 to appear to at least try and level the playing field in Gunner Heat PC
T-80BV would be about at the same tech level as the M1IP in game. Would certainly give the M1 a run for its money.
@@-Zevin- unfortunately we will not be seeing the t80 BV in this theater as it didn't really exist yet as the theater were in his fulda gap in 1985 however we will see the T80B
@@gavingreer7841 That's good to hear at least, the T-80B will still be a huge step up from the T-72
Personally I'm most excited for the T-64.
@@Wolfpack345 A man of culture.
Brown alert moment for that T-55 crew. "Scheiße! Sie sagten, diese Flanke sei frei!"
Laze, dump track fire, if you hold it too long the ballistic computer will add that lead
6:19 - I'd have given that BRDM some Calibre Fifty. No need to waste main gun ammunition.
Man watching this really makes me wish for a combat simulator that has all the aspects of this game, men of war, ruse, and hearts of iron 4 all in one! if it could go from romans to the future too thatd be one hell of a game! despite my hopes and dreams, awesome video!
You're asking for far too much, friend. Developers are only mortals lol
@@xmlthegreat idk man, sooner or later I feel like its gonna happen, either using existing engines/software or skins/textures/models, id say its definitely gonna happen eventually, just who knows if its in our time lol
No spreadsheet games please.
@@schaddenkorp6977 what is that?
I need to buy this game. I've been resorting to War Thunder for my tank fix and I feel immense amounts of shame because of it.
It's fun! When they add co-op we will have to play
Whenever I see people play this game I just feel there is no tension because the AI is so bad and non-threatening.
As of right now the devs intend to make it much more of a challenge.
I disagree that the AI is non threatening. You're only gonna see the best runs Wolfpack has in his videos but if you're playing mission after mission you can quickly get wrecked by enemies in good positions. In particular, playing as the Soviets going against the M2 and M1 combo'd up is practically suicide.
You forget that you can't repair and heal the crew like war thunder. So if you get shot. It's a threatening situation. And the crew can't compensate each other work.
If driver dies. He dies. And your tank will be immobilized for the rest of that mission.
If loader dies. Your tank can't reload for the rest of the mission.
If gunner dies. You can't shoot.
If commander die. No one will call out the enemy position.
MORE GUNNER HEAT PLEASE!!!!🤩🤩🤩
Hopefully in the future of this game this theatre will be more balanced. Fighting against Abrams as east germans is terrifying.
War isn't fair.
It's a game.
@@TheAngrySaxon1 yeah well this isnt war its a videogame that costs 40$
@Demon im thinking soviet vehicles will have a better dart round that can penetrate abrams more easily. I doubt they have anything with good armor against 105mm
@Demon i dont think T64B is being added, the only T64 currently WIP is the T64A. But yes i agree BMP2 will be very fun and will give bradleys a run for their money.
You can snap to targets called out by your TC by hitting space bar, great for a pinch
That BRDM air time though!
I think that the game still need a year until it's finished .
Looking forward to this games development, bought it last night because of your vids! Hope its popularity blows up and we get years worth of updates to the game!
The new fire effects are very good , id like if they increase that the fires keep burning longer tho after destroying target
Hell yeah!! Great video. I love the gunner heat content. Thanks wolfpack
When I first got the game, I only played the T-55 to get used to the controls, switching over the play the Abrams felt like I got cheat codes. The fire control system is insane, still I love the my T-55.
3:23 STUNTIN
Microprose M1 Tank Platoon has come a long way.
My favorite content of yours!
That definitely a "floor it they got tanks" moment
I feel the one thing this lacks is a driver view. Although a bit limited compared to the turret positions - it would help me keep my bearings, and is important for reference to know if you're hull down or properly cresting a hill.
Just use third person
@@matthewjones39 Pretty sure real tank commanders would love a 3rd person view too, but I'm trying to expand the sim aspect.
@@MrChainsawAardvark So press shift. You’re on the commanders hatch. “Muh realism” maintained.
I think that BMP was driven by the Duke Brothers making jumps like that
It was a BRDM (wheeled recon vehicle), but it was pretty wild. The crew might have had some broken bones after that.
@@vicomteturenne yeah I'm not to very knowledgeable in cold War ussr vehicles but good to know for the future
love the gunner, heat, pc engagements but id also like to see some il2 again
Then along came the T-90-M! F K......
That little BRDM I think it was at 6:00 while you were "restocking" the main gun, why didn't you light it up with the .50? You were close enough and a M2 would likely have turned it into swiss cheese
OMG combining this with Voice Attack would be sooo cool
Is there some forum where we could talk to the devs about improvements/ critique?
Funny looking Churchill Mk.IV tank :D
Do the T-72's snorkel under water obstacle and BMP's swim across in this game bypassing the M-1's who then have to look for their fuel trucks, fill up and then try and catch them? Or do they always just charge like idiots into the guns in a circle jerk? Operation Bagration 1944 the German Wehrmacht got which Army Group was going to get the summer offensive wrong.
Regiment and more War on the Sea would be good. Also Cold Waters. Oh.. you haven't played IL2 Tank Commander for a long time.
Solid!
Top KEK!
Peace be with you.
Abrams sure is a handsome looking tank.
Gunner, Sabot, Tank!
Loved the BRDM2 Jump
The real drawback of the Russian T72 T80 T90 tanks is gravity, in the sense that the Russian tanks are accurate in the firing of their cannon up to 1000 meters then gravity wins and their firing becomes inaccurate, while the firing of all western tanks is accurate up to 3000 meters having superior technology to Russian tanks, plus many other things including the ability to take shots
Western infantry support is also vastly superior to the Russians, having superior armor to that of the Muscovites and having missiles capable of precisely attacking Russian tanks
Love the M60s. Was just looking at one today as I drove past a neighboring towns VFW Hall display. I was wondering if it's engine could still fire up, like those old Russian T72s from long ago still do.
looks more like baby seal clubbing than a challange
Wow, I’d love to get a PC to play this game as well as Wolfpack. Great video mate!
Very nice! I might grab a coffee cup also.
Tank on tank combat is brutal to the human body.
He got some air!!!!!
3:22 how do you say yee haw in Russian?
That 105mm really looks tiny on that M1
I mean 58 tons of armor
Hi Wolf! Great video. Is it possible for you to increase your field of view? When you were backing away from the hillside near the beginning after being surprised by the T-55, it seemed as though you really couldn't see very far towards your peripheral. I don't believe you were using optics, but I may be mistaken. Thanks for posting this! P.S. if GHPC can ever be modded, I'd love to see WW1 tanks really done well here.
Great game, but It is a pity that the real combined arms combat is not implemented in the game (yet?). For the M1, it’s more likely that not the T-72s will go, but the KA-52s will arrive. In modern combat, it is rare that tanks simply oppose each other, without aviation support. Aircraft/artillery/infantry are controlled by AI and players control tanks. Then the game would be most realistic.
Ai doing literally nothing. You can pick any vehicle and kill everything as they are standing or moving straight. inputs are very clunky in this game btw
Didn't expect BRDM rally!
To be fair, the m1 is the everything killer
I wonder what it would be like for you to try and drive the T-72 and go up against some M1s.
I've done that in previous videos
@@Wolfpack345 I guess I'm mistaken then I've only seen the DDR T-72 vs M60s, sorry about that.
@@alexwieland-ducher8792 Maybe it was on stream.. I'll do a video!
It's painful. The older ammo the DDR gets doesn't go through the any part of the M1's front except at very close range, and even shots that do get inside rarely prevent it from shooting back.
That's what the Germans said about the Tiger vs the Sherman and the Cromwell??!!
Great Game! Cant wait for Infantry !
Comma and period to change time between day and night .. but it is not working on my pc?
That t-55 coming over the hill was a pucker factor moment..
that was a nice little intro
This game looks awesome and realistic unlike war thunder where every Russian tank is invincible!
Just out of curiosity have thought of doing a mission in a T-72 on Gunner, Heat, PC?
Oh for sure! I play with the T-72 a lot on stream. I'll do more videos soon. Can't wait for crew voices to be added
@@Wolfpack345 can’t wait to see it 😊
1991 Irak Kuwait si affrontano 5000 T72 irakeni e 2000 Abrams e tutti sappiamo che brutta fine hanno fatto i T72
Excellent content!
that was literally illegal what you did to that small child at 6:14
People have described me as a "Friendly Pos" too.
Where's the smoke? When you back away from your hull down firing position with Red tanks in close, POP SMOKE. You can see them and they can't see you. You can get off another shot while moving to your backup position. I can't understand the lack of smoke in the tutorials.
nice shooting wolf,
interesting game, like the old M1 Tank Platoon but more user friendly....dude make a Challenger 1 in game or a Chieftain and you get a costumer! (well, put the Leo 1 and Leo 2 too to gain more crowd)
The game will never have British tanks, and he’s not even a developer.
Прикольный шутер.
Brilliant
1969 tank vs 1980 tank
Is that music the game soundtrack?
It sure makes quite obvious that the Abrams and likely the leopard a2 wil just …tear thru any Russian armour in Ukraine. * if the crews are properly trained*
Сомневаюсь, что с них будет много толку. Леопард и абрамс машины не плохие, но советские танки они броней и пушкой не превосходили. Плюсами западных танков являлись система управления огнем и приборы наблюдения, в остальном танки СССР не хуже. Танки на Украине редко воюют с танками, в основном танки уничтожает либо артиллерия и авиация, либо человек с гранатомётом. Советский танк в этом отношении лучше, во первых он ниже, и соответственно в него тяжелее попасть, во вторых они покрыты динамической защитой, которая действительно спасает от кумулятивных боеприпасов, если же по советскому танку стреляет артиллерия, то опять же шансов больше, по той причине, что броня толще в бортах в несколько раз чем у западных ( на т72 на сколько помню 80мм, на леопарде вроде 20-40мм). А если возвращаться к вопросу кто кого пробьет, то не забывайте про фугасные боеприпасы на танки СССР, им даже леопард пробивать не нужно, попадание снаряда с 5кг взрывчатки с большей долей вероятности выводит танк из строя. Так же основной боеприпас 3БМ42 " манго", должен пробивать леопард в лоб башни, практически куда угодно, но в защиту могу сказать, что и российским танкам будет в таких боях не легко. В целом я считаю, что ничего хорошего западные танки на Украине не ждёт, хотя бы из за логистических проблем, касающихся запчастей и людей кто эти танки будет обслуживать. Возить танки на ремонт в Польшу, довольно долго. А если брать обещанные леопард 1, то это даже не смешно, он и т62м не конкурент. Время покажет
at 1000 meter or less you dont need to laze , the sabot rounds have little drop that is not usefull : ) i learn this from a real tanker
How come not a single T 72 seems to shoot at the player tank.??
Soviet tank crews aren't trained to fire on the move. Gunner uses the stabilized gun and sight to acquire the target, the driver then short halts for the gunner to fire. Auto reload on the move is not much better than 4 rpm. WP tank gunnery training calls for 30 second engagement sequence, unlike NATO crews, the best of which can get off 10 rpm at close (1000 meter) range targets.
TIL the t-55 doesn't have an autoloader
MUY MUY FREEBRAMS
Which block M1 is this? I assume 1980s era since it's fighting Warsaw Pact T-72s?
Figure it’s at least an A1 variant. The ap shot is that dreaded dart based on he way it just goes right through
It's called the M1IP in game, which seems to be an interim model since it has a 105mm cannon
@@shaunwu3910 the M1IP is an M1 with Improved armor, it was made in '84, before the A1
Currently in the game we have the M1 and M1IP we will not see the M1A1 in this theater as it was not available in the fulda gap in 1985 (That's when the game takes place)
However once 1.0 is out and they start working another theaters maybe desert Storm or something like that it's very much possible
Us older folk remember the tank with the original 105mm along with the M60 -- one upon a time.
F-14 Tomcats flew back then as well! 😉
10 Abrams vs 14 T-72s, 8 BMPs, and 11 T-55s. Play as an Abrams tank and the Soviets must be destroyed
They say a strong processor is a must ....... I'm not a computer wonk, so is a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10875H CPU @ 2.30GHz 2.30 GHz with RTX 2070 Super on Alienware laptop good for frame rates in this sim ???? I have 32 Gig of ram also..... Thanks guys !!!!! 🙂
I haven't played the game, but those are above average specs overall. You should get playable framerates!
@@supersarge24 Thank you Sir !! 🙂
yeah, backing up from t55 is absolutely The T-72 Killer move
This game is pretty realistic. If you shoot and miss at a very close range, backing up and losing the contact temporarily are a good idea. Otherwise, you would be get killed or lose modules pretty fast. It is not matter you drive the best tank or not. Close range shots are dangerous and (mostly) fatal.
No tank is invincible genius.
Do another Bradley one