IMC Demag AC 650 Mobile Crane 'Nederhoff' by Cranes Etc TV

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • This is the Cranes Etc TV review of IMC Model's 1/50 scale model of the Demag AC 650 Mobile Crane in the colours of Nederhoff. The model number is 32-0191. The full review is on the Cranes Etc website: www.CranesEtc.c....
    Where to buy? www.nederhoffs...

Комментарии • 32

  • @jamesberlo4298
    @jamesberlo4298 4 месяца назад +1

    I wish they made a Fly Jib and / or Tower Boom set up, , I love the AC 1600 version of it,

  • @mingming9604
    @mingming9604 5 месяцев назад +4

    This or WSI 1650 ? Just feel like WSI LTM 1650 is a bit better model. And you can use a jib with it

    • @RELAVI
      @RELAVI 5 месяцев назад +1

      you're comparing a 90's crane and an early one, i mean there is no comparison

  • @craneman2201
    @craneman2201 5 месяцев назад +4

    What a fiasco, naming the Superlift SSL (sideways superlift), instead of SL (superlift), the most noticeable difference between AC700 and AC650.

    • @CranesEtcTV
      @CranesEtcTV  5 месяцев назад +3

      It was my error. The assembly manual names it correctly.

    • @AlMcpherson79
      @AlMcpherson79 Месяц назад

      @@CranesEtcTV Well,, the 650 700, the few differences ARE in the superlift, and the 700 has the sideways version. I honestly didn't even know the difference aside from the "yeah we just changed the number in the graphic we paint on it, like when we renumbered them from AC 1600-" issue. (minor differences: how the tie bars for the superlift rest on the boom when the superlift isn't fitted... and no little ladder over the right-side slew motor on the turret.)

  • @AlMcpherson79
    @AlMcpherson79 Месяц назад +1

    3:12 2.24kg x 50: 112kg. a little shy of the real machines 112 *t* in that config! ... though the numbers do align for a nice unit switch next to the number!

  • @Jimmy-Short
    @Jimmy-Short 5 месяцев назад +3

    Did it remove the out-triggers to reduce the weight of the crane when moving on road like a normal vehicle (like trucks)

    • @AlMcpherson79
      @AlMcpherson79 Месяц назад

      The overall weight of the vehicle is pretty huge in its heaviest transport configuration. Many countries don't allow for such weights, through axle weight limits.
      I'm in the UK, and here we have a max of 16.5t per axle, so for a nine-axle crane, maximum road travel weight off 148.5t. However, I do believe that is specifically through regulations for mobile cranes. Generally, trucks have 9t (two tyres per axle) or 12t (four tyres per axle). Though that is some assumptions on my part.
      In many places - europe, america, etc, the axle weights are *generally much lower, 12t or even 9t.
      The real crane can be stripped down a LOT to the point of chassis-only. Even the superstructure - the big thing that rotates with the cab on it - can be removed.
      Bearing in mind that it's book says the vehicle is about 139t (15.5t axle load) with ~ 4.7t of accessories in boom+superlift+4outriggers... here's the weights of each bit that get removed;
      Superlift; 12t (remove with accessories, for 13.7t Axle Load)
      Outriggers: 5t EACH (remove front pair with accesories, for 14.5t axle load) .. (Remove all four outriggers+superlift, retain accessories, for 12t axle load.)
      Boom; 42t (Remove with superlift, outriggers accessories, for 8.5t axle load.)
      Superstructure turret with luffing cylinder, 25t. Remove to reduce total 62t to 37t for avg axle load 4.1t.
      So basically: the boom is ~42t, the carrier chassis weight is ~37t, the superstructure is ~25t, the outriggers collectively about 19t~20t, the superlift ~12t,.
      Then you've got the Ballast. The plate with hoist unit (transport seperately, always) is 20t, with each individual ballast piece 10t each. the full ballast configuration, using twin stacks of 7 weights, combines to 160t (140t of the weight pieces, +20t for the plate they sit on with the hoist unit.)
      The crane itself, with full ballast and nothing else, does indeed almost hit 300t.

  • @lastnamefirstname520
    @lastnamefirstname520 5 месяцев назад +4

    Really needs a jib this one!

    • @craneman2201
      @craneman2201 5 месяцев назад +3

      did IMC change the max. boomangle?

  • @user-wv4io3pd8n
    @user-wv4io3pd8n 4 месяца назад +2

    당수동 ~수원 역

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад +1

    1968,56년전

  • @user-ky1dv1fw6k
    @user-ky1dv1fw6k 5 месяцев назад +3

    네덜란드 닥치 크레인 히어 회사

  • @user-ky1dv1fw6k
    @user-ky1dv1fw6k 5 месяцев назад +3

    2016

  • @drajeeling
    @drajeeling 5 месяцев назад +1

    Komatsu pc200 hyrbid

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 4 месяца назад

    1500-8.1,1400등과유사

  • @user-jh8ev6ul8p
    @user-jh8ev6ul8p 5 месяцев назад +3

    Demag AC 650 'Nederhoff'

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад

    네덜란드 🇳🇱 암스테르담

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад

    본오동 ~배곧신도시

    • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
      @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад +1

      62
      안산 ,인천

    • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
      @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад +1

      고잔고등학교,중앙 역 경유 (안산 역)

    • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
      @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад +1

      하지마 ~아퍼,복수할꺼야 😢

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 4 месяца назад

    부품이각져있다

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l Месяц назад +1

    31-0071

  • @user-dz8mx3zy5l
    @user-dz8mx3zy5l 2 месяца назад +1

    42-0271