I can't help but notice that when a woman with a high body count is with a man who is inexperienced (virgin to low), she (usually) gets bored with him. Also, he doesn't get the same treatment as the players that she was with before got. Also, I keep noticing that women with more of a past tend to be more jaded. When they finally settle for the boring, stable, provider guy, they expect him to atone for the sins of the bad boys. I tend to suspect that women with a high body count who marry men with a high body count are probably more likely to be happy.
Interesting how most of the comments are woman agreeing. Do they think the men like it when woman have huge partner amounts? Is there NO un-favorable traits that arise from high partner count?
U did not debunk her, u just proved her claim to be milder than she claimed. And a rebuttal to this video will show many places where u were biased. Also pearl many times mentioned that virgin men also have the highest odds of a happy marriage. Which u skipped.
No. Just….god no. Do you know how much money my couples have shelled out in couples therapy just for me to have to explain why all these podcasts and dating “coaches” are wrong? It wastes time and distracts from the actual work that couples need to do in relationship therapy. I’m tired of having to take valuable session time to correct the messages that all of these unqualified, entitled, arrogant, and bigoted people are spewing out to millions of people who don’t understand how research works and take everything as fact as long as it fits an agenda. Grow up. Podcasts like these are causing more ruin to both relationships and individual people and I’m sick of their fans doubling down. If you want to live in ignorance cool. But don’t go harming other people with the bigoted bullshit.
Another possible confounding factor could be as simple as personality or even presence of ADHD. If you have ADHD you are more likely to have a larger number of sexual partners, and you are also more likely to go through marital issues, both caused independently by things like high impulsivity. Or you could generally have a personality in which you get bored easily with your partners. But yeah so many plausible confounding factors linked to the correlation it's comical to say definitely more partners directly causes worse marital outcomes
Absolutely! There are so many factors that could lead BOTH to more premarital partners AND to more difficult marriages that saying that the mere act of sleeping with more people CAUSES the later marital difficulties is quite a bold claim. One that needs significant evidence 😉
Even if this WAS the case...If sleeping with more people means your marriage is bad perhaps it's because you know you deserve better since you've experienced it
Also living with someone with ADHD can make you second guess wanting to get married to them 😂😂 (no offence to my boyfriend, but close the goddamn lid!) 😂
I think most men have heard horror stories of a man being a good provider, but his wife just can't seem to get over one of her exes. I will say, that one of the most toxic things a person can do in a relationship is to constantly compare their current partner with previous partners. There is the whole concept of being "Alpha Widowed" where a woman had a relationship, sometimes very brief, with another man who was more attractive, desired, and dominant than the men she can get to commit to her in the present. The most prominent example of this is Jada Pinkett and Will Smith. Their daughter, Willow, actually wrote a letter to Tupac Shakur asking him to come back so that her mother could be happy again. That's an astonishingly high level of cuckery. I think a lot of men are afraid of ending up married to a woman like that. It shoudl be noted that a woman having a low body count or even being a virgin on her wedding night does demonstrate a fair amount of discipline. If a woman is promiscuous then it's not entirely unreasonable to wonder how she will have the discipline to stay faithful to one man over decades.
😂😂😂 Tupac died in 1996, four years before Willow was born. Also this statistic is true for men not just women. I think you need to watch this again and pay closer attention.
5:05 The chart even contradicts the description, which says the chart covers “all sexually active women,” while the side of the chart itself indicates “sexually active women between the ages of 15 and 45.”
An important topic, but I was left with the impression that the debunking was more important than the underlying facts. I would like to see more studies like this to get to the truth. There is something very significant in keeping sex for monogamous marriage. All the civilisations that have risen have had strict monogamy and have controlled the sexual behaviour of the women (J D Unwin, Sex and Culture)
Hi, I’m going on pearls show tonight and the topic of show is “modern women cheat more than men”, so I’ve just been doing research into some of her claims and found your video. Thank you so much for making this, I hope you don’t mind me using this information tonight with credit of course, but you’ve answered and linked so many things I have been questioning ever since I watched that particular clip too!
Hey there, glad to hear that this helped! And even more glad to hear that someone is actually doing proper research before one of these conversations 👏😀
thank you so much for this video. this is REALLY important as I only prefer to debunk claims if I have a scientific basis for that and know what I'm talking about. I think nowadays sharing science is extremely important.
also can I translate your video for free? I'd be more than happy to! I've been an English teacher for over 8 years in Brazil and worked as an intern translator.
Omg! Thank you for making this. My friend sent me this video and I knew this woman was full of it. I’ve heard this stat before but I knew her explanation was totally wrong.
Thank you for this. I had never heard any of this before. I'm a pretty sex positive guy and I met a guy recently who said something about pair bonding to me the other day and said it was scientific fact lol. I didn't argue with him because I was studying for my physics exam but I felt like it couldn't be true. It was really hard to find your video amidst all the Jordan Peterson, Pearl Daily, and manosphere stuff. Again thanks
@@sarahelizabeth2359it’s pure logic. If you are someone who has many partners, you either 1. Don’t give a shit about long term relationships 2. Choose badly 3. You’re impulsive and are a shitty person who gets dumped a lot A person like this doesn’t magically become wife or husband material. The chances of that are slimmer than the reverse.
It's a convincing argument, that the more sexual partners one has: the less likely you are to have a lifelong marriage. Because sleeping around displays an inability to commit to one person. You need to be able to commit to one person, in order to have a lifelong marriage. Edit: fixed some grammar
@@carmeld45 yes, it's true for men, as well. I never said that it was exclusive to women. @carmeld45, I didn't even mention gender, I didn't use gendered pronouns such as "he" or "she", in my original comment. The only pronoun I used was "you", which is gender-neutral.
@@carmeld45 yes, it applies to men. I never said that it was exclusive to women. In my original comment, I didn't use any gendered pronouns, that would suggest that it was exclusive to women. I only used the pronoun "you", which is gender-neutral.
Love this video, honestly. Found you on tiktok on my fyp, and really looking forward for more videos like this. I like the objective cold facts that can destroy or sustain arguments. Congrats!
Nice explanation! With the religion part, I'd also add that women who are virgins or who have less partners are more likely to be religious, so that likely is the reason why such women are less likely to divorce and more likely to stay in a committed relationship Ultimately, I think the biggest issue that guys who insist that women be virgins though don't apply the standard to themselves and ignore the fact if are being promiscuous themselves, they're going to most likely attract people who have a similar lifestyle. Since the women they want (usually traditional Christian virgins) are usually religious, they'll typically want a guy who is saving himself for marriage
Bingo! The virgin, religious women don't want the promiscuous, red pill men. I used to be that religious virgin woman. I gave all I had to my ex-husband and found out he was a cheater and also lied about having been a virgin before we married. He had been promiscuous. The double standards sicken me. I left religion and that crappy marriage. You're very right about what you said. If men want a virgin, they should aim to be one, too. If they want to be promiscuous, they should accept that from their partners. I don't think many red pill guys know or talk to many real women. They seem to only talk to social media influencers and women that don't live like the majority of regular women.
Thanks for finding that chart. I'd already found the graph you show in your video. Chart 15 showing % sexually active women as a function of non-marital sex partners has a rather obvious "cause and effect issue". This is the "cause" of an increase in on marital partners is having sex when you are not married. The denominator is "all sexually active women over 30". So, given that, the question is what number of lifetime marriage? Or number of sexual partners. Clearly, "sexually active" women over 30 who are NOT married are very likely to be accumulating non-marital sexual partners and have been since they became sexually. In contrast, women who get married and remain married mostly do not accumulate non-marital sexual partners. ( Having a non-marital sexual partner while married generally results in divorce.) So the "correlation" between "Not being in a stable marriage" and "having more nonmarital sexual partners" must be pushed toward positive for this reason. (And so "being in a stable marriage" and "having more nonmarital sexual partners" negative.) But this is not because having more sexual partners makes marriage less stable, but because being in a long term marriage reduced non-marital sexual partners! Could having more sexual partners ALSO reduce marital bliss and stability? Sure. It's not an either or thing. But the metric illustrated in this particular graph is singularly deficient in teasing that out -- because there is a very obvious casual effect of *stable marriage* reduce the accumulation of *number of non-marital sexual partners* over time.
Yep... if N is number of non-marital sexual partners and X stable marriage: P(X|N) = P(N|X) * P(X)/P(N). So if the number of non-marital partners is larger for the unmarried than for the married (because they are, ahem, unmarried) then chart 15 will heve the general appearnce it has. (I'm a bit motivated to get the data and find P(N|X) and compare to (P(N|!X).
Thank you!!!! I’m a social worker and value true social research!! I hate when “research” is butchered and altered to fit a philosophy. Thank you for demonstrating everything wrong with this claim. ❤
This was amazing and I’m honestly excited to see what you’ll do in the future. Your ability to breakdown how data is interpreted is some thing I’m looking forward to better educate myself.
I appreciate your scientific approach, and I reject "purity culture," but we do get good at whatever we practice. Thinking more partners than 4.8 equals promiscuity is absurd, but practicing disposable sex for several years means you accept that you are also disposable. 4.8 is a red herring. 30, 40, 70 is not.
Your attitude towards the subject matter is scientific? I guess it will resound with the female viewers who are living the modern free woman life the person is talking about. Good luck you may win a few
This guy just said that more sexual partners lead to worse marriage. Fact that more sexual partners isn't the root couse, but not having your head srewed right doesn't matter.
A lot of this was fair, and far more fair than I first expected when I listened and gave it a chance. What I would really appreciate however, is an example whereby you ask if a liberal source "might have an agenda to push". Id love to be proven wrong in my suspicion that there is no such example.
Another factor could be that men don't want to date hoes. While women don't really care about body count. So women tend to lie about their body count and eitherway that becomes an issue. So it might have nothing to do with "pair bonding", but more with what people desire in a partner. Also, you just debunked every social study out there.
Ahhh, congratulations for managing to debunk noone. I was interested to see how wrong she was and the only thing you did was confirm her message. More than anything this video is an embarrassment to science
My female friend M stated to me that her now ex husband was sexual partner number 7 when she met him at age 21. My 2 male friends M and C have wives that never had sex and they married mid to late 20’s and are still together. No real strife at all. Just regular ups and downs. My female friend M to me has no love for her ex. Not hate, but no love and they were together for 20 yrs basically.
We live in a stage "post factum"This is a great video ☝️. Keep up the good work. 🤞Pls can you direct me to the source video ?Only for study purposes & and broadening horizons.Thx
Sure! There's the link to it at the end of the first section in the article here: distilledscience.xyz/articles/does-having-more-sexual-partners-lower-your-chance-of-a-happy-marriage
Her data is coming from multiple sources including the heritage group but also physiology today and institute for family planning. This I'd a disingenuous unscientific debunk video.
Pearl is notorious for this. I’m still trying to decide if she’s intentionally misrepresenting the data and studies she “cites” or if she just regurgitating things she’s heard other people say and takes as fact. The way she uses casual and scientific terms interchangeably tells me she hasn’t actually parsed through the data herself to make sense of it
I know for sure us smart enough men still understood what she meant when she said unhappy marriages, we definitely thought of (likely to get divorced) he took everything literal with the happiness which is good, but that jus helps men to makes us more aware of women with high body counts, which is what I came to watch
@@beianimeyah24 you don’t get to claim to be the side of “facts over feelings” if your facts aren’t right. We’re not here for emotional pats on the back. We’re here to ground our thoughts and actions in reality. The second you let is slide on your slide you give ground to the opposition to do the same.
@@bigboma well I get to claim, that I’m on the side that is more likely correct than siding with those foolish women who come on the podcast, Pearl is more likely to be be closer to the the correct answer maybe not accurately but more than the women she goes up against, this guy jus shows how close she is to the accurate answer, so in that saying, are you gonna you vouch for someone who’s more likely to be right or more likely to be wrong? That’s if you were watching pearls original video and taking a side?
@@beianimeyah24 this is middle school level critical thinking. so you’re okay with using the same logic and the same tactics as the women you criticize? That’s on you. I’d that rather be factually correct and prove it, then just have an opinion because it makes me feel good. I don’t have to choose who’s “more than likely to be right” when I can just be right. Pearl chose a conclusion you agree with but supported it with misrepresented, non peer reviewed information. Which means she didn’t actually prove anything. And he dismantles it in this video. How about do the intellectual leg work And support your opinions and conclusions with data that actually backs up how you feel?
Bro you need at least a million subscribers. People need to share the hell out of your page on their own social media Facebook and stuff. This is real education. Not that conservative culture pseudo intellectual bullshit
You can’t rule it out. You should change your conclusions to - there isn’t any studies done to verified the video claims. So your explanations are just as good as hers
Exactly! Saying there are no studies proving pair bonding does not logically demand the conclusion “it’s not a thing”. There were once no studies proving the earth is a sphere.
Awesome analysis! Love this! Please make more! Science is fucking cool!!!!! Love, love, love things being broken down and seeking data to support! This video is great because it doesn’t pick a side it just shows us how to digest all the bullshit that can be out there to make an informed opinion about it.
Hey what if a girl collects marriage proposals and filters those proposals. After weeding out the proposals and chooses the right guy for marriage, will she just keep comparing the guy with all the other proposals. Is this comparable to having multiple sex partners? Can the girl still pair bond with her husband?
I have a question. Why do people still have sex? Sex is very gross, nasty, messy, and disgusting! I don't see how sex is a good thing. Why don't humans just remove sex from this world? Women can still get pregnant without sex (there's a lot of ways women can get pregnant without sex including artificial insemination). Sex does cause a lot of problems, so the world might be a much better place without it.
The people who believe that the tools they learn to criticize journal articles, from simple correlation is not causation, to p-hacking their data, are the only esteemed methods of epistemology are the same idiots who wouldn’t bring a parachute to a skydiving jump due to a lack of doubled blind randomized studies 😂
this is the first time i’ve ever gone to someone’s youtube channel from a tiktok. you did a really good job and kept interesting!
Aww thanks! That means a lot! 😊
Me too lol
Same!!
Same!!!!
Same!!!!
I can't help but notice that when a woman with a high body count is with a man who is inexperienced (virgin to low), she (usually) gets bored with him. Also, he doesn't get the same treatment as the players that she was with before got.
Also, I keep noticing that women with more of a past tend to be more jaded. When they finally settle for the boring, stable, provider guy, they expect him to atone for the sins of the bad boys.
I tend to suspect that women with a high body count who marry men with a high body count are probably more likely to be happy.
Interesting how most of the comments are woman agreeing. Do they think the men like it when woman have huge partner amounts? Is there NO un-favorable traits that arise from high partner count?
The are just agreeing to continue being promiscious 304s
@@SonGoku-zr9nc why dont you ask men to stop being promiscious ? will solve all the problems
@@sparshcasticgo ask them yourself, don't u have mouth?
@@patrickudekwe i do
@@sparshcastic very good
U did not debunk her, u just proved her claim to be milder than she claimed. And a rebuttal to this video will show many places where u were biased.
Also pearl many times mentioned that virgin men also have the highest odds of a happy marriage.
Which u skipped.
Facts
No. Just….god no. Do you know how much money my couples have shelled out in couples therapy just for me to have to explain why all these podcasts and dating “coaches” are wrong? It wastes time and distracts from the actual work that couples need to do in relationship therapy. I’m tired of having to take valuable session time to correct the messages that all of these unqualified, entitled, arrogant, and bigoted people are spewing out to millions of people who don’t understand how research works and take everything as fact as long as it fits an agenda. Grow up. Podcasts like these are causing more ruin to both relationships and individual people and I’m sick of their fans doubling down. If you want to live in ignorance cool. But don’t go harming other people with the bigoted bullshit.
Yep! The bias was strong with this one.
So basically: there is a correlation but its to a lesser extent than what she said.
correct its roughly 75 percent to 50 percent
Yesssss! I love deep dives and debunk videos 🤩🤩
I'd like to see more debunk on purity culture 😃
Yesssssssssssssssssssss I lalalalala love themmmmmmmmm
All of the high body count heauxs are like, "Yes!!! There's still hope for me out there." Nah heaux, you're f*cked and even you know it.
Another possible confounding factor could be as simple as personality or even presence of ADHD. If you have ADHD you are more likely to have a larger number of sexual partners, and you are also more likely to go through marital issues, both caused independently by things like high impulsivity. Or you could generally have a personality in which you get bored easily with your partners. But yeah so many plausible confounding factors linked to the correlation it's comical to say definitely more partners directly causes worse marital outcomes
Absolutely! There are so many factors that could lead BOTH to more premarital partners AND to more difficult marriages that saying that the mere act of sleeping with more people CAUSES the later marital difficulties is quite a bold claim. One that needs significant evidence 😉
Even if this WAS the case...If sleeping with more people means your marriage is bad perhaps it's because you know you deserve better since you've experienced it
Also living with someone with ADHD can make you second guess wanting to get married to them 😂😂 (no offence to my boyfriend, but close the goddamn lid!) 😂
sooo....it is still correct, regardless of why.
Everything. Depression anxiety asd etc
Love this long form content, keep it up!
Thanks! That’s the plan going forward 😄! Even if it takes sooo much longer to write / film / edit 🙈
I think most men have heard horror stories of a man being a good provider, but his wife just can't seem to get over one of her exes. I will say, that one of the most toxic things a person can do in a relationship is to constantly compare their current partner with previous partners. There is the whole concept of being "Alpha Widowed" where a woman had a relationship, sometimes very brief, with another man who was more attractive, desired, and dominant than the men she can get to commit to her in the present.
The most prominent example of this is Jada Pinkett and Will Smith. Their daughter, Willow, actually wrote a letter to Tupac Shakur asking him to come back so that her mother could be happy again. That's an astonishingly high level of cuckery. I think a lot of men are afraid of ending up married to a woman like that.
It shoudl be noted that a woman having a low body count or even being a virgin on her wedding night does demonstrate a fair amount of discipline. If a woman is promiscuous then it's not entirely unreasonable to wonder how she will have the discipline to stay faithful to one man over decades.
😂😂😂 Tupac died in 1996, four years before Willow was born. Also this statistic is true for men not just women. I think you need to watch this again and pay closer attention.
5:05 The chart even contradicts the description, which says the chart covers “all sexually active women,” while the side of the chart itself indicates “sexually active women between the ages of 15 and 45.”
An important topic, but I was left with the impression that the debunking was more important than the underlying facts. I would like to see more studies like this to get to the truth. There is something very significant in keeping sex for monogamous marriage. All the civilisations that have risen have had strict monogamy and have controlled the sexual behaviour of the women (J D Unwin, Sex and Culture)
Hi, I’m going on pearls show tonight and the topic of show is “modern women cheat more than men”, so I’ve just been doing research into some of her claims and found your video. Thank you so much for making this, I hope you don’t mind me using this information tonight with credit of course, but you’ve answered and linked so many things I have been questioning ever since I watched that particular clip too!
Hey there, glad to hear that this helped! And even more glad to hear that someone is actually doing proper research before one of these conversations 👏😀
thank you so much for this video. this is REALLY important as I only prefer to debunk claims if I have a scientific basis for that and know what I'm talking about. I think nowadays sharing science is extremely important.
also can I translate your video for free? I'd be more than happy to! I've been an English teacher for over 8 years in Brazil and worked as an intern translator.
this is a really good video, i thought that u have 1.73m subs, but its only 1.73k, u deserve much more
Omg! Thank you for making this. My friend sent me this video and I knew this woman was full of it. I’ve heard this stat before but I knew her explanation was totally wrong.
Thank you for this. I had never heard any of this before. I'm a pretty sex positive guy and I met a guy recently who said something about pair bonding to me the other day and said it was scientific fact lol. I didn't argue with him because I was studying for my physics exam but I felt like it couldn't be true. It was really hard to find your video amidst all the Jordan Peterson, Pearl Daily, and manosphere stuff. Again thanks
I knew her comment didn’t sit right with me! Thank you for the video!!
I’m really enjoying the long form format! Very excited to see more!
All wrong, pair bonding is real and more sexual partners means less wife material. Facts
Ikr the only people denying this are fminists, 304s and s,imps
Marry who you want, just don’t pretend it’s based in science
@@sarahelizabeth2359it’s pure logic. If you are someone who has many partners, you either
1. Don’t give a shit about long term relationships
2. Choose badly
3. You’re impulsive and are a shitty person who gets dumped a lot
A person like this doesn’t magically become wife or husband material. The chances of that are slimmer than the reverse.
It's a convincing argument, that the more sexual partners one has: the less likely you are to have a lifelong marriage. Because sleeping around displays an inability to commit to one person. You need to be able to commit to one person, in order to have a lifelong marriage.
Edit: fixed some grammar
Yes and we don’t need a peer reviewed study to tell us sex is bonding.
Is this true for males as well, if not..your theory is full of shi!T
@@carmeld45 yes, it's true for men, as well. I never said that it was exclusive to women.
@carmeld45, I didn't even mention gender, I didn't use gendered pronouns such as "he" or "she", in my original comment. The only pronoun I used was "you", which is gender-neutral.
@@carmeld45 yes, it applies to men. I never said that it was exclusive to women. In my original comment, I didn't use any gendered pronouns, that would suggest that it was exclusive to women. I only used the pronoun "you", which is gender-neutral.
Love this video, honestly. Found you on tiktok on my fyp, and really looking forward for more videos like this. I like the objective cold facts that can destroy or sustain arguments. Congrats!
Thank you for doing such important work. Purity culture BS is not science
Nice explanation!
With the religion part, I'd also add that women who are virgins or who have less partners are more likely to be religious, so that likely is the reason why such women are less likely to divorce and more likely to stay in a committed relationship
Ultimately, I think the biggest issue that guys who insist that women be virgins though don't apply the standard to themselves and ignore the fact if are being promiscuous themselves, they're going to most likely attract people who have a similar lifestyle. Since the women they want (usually traditional Christian virgins) are usually religious, they'll typically want a guy who is saving himself for marriage
Bingo! The virgin, religious women don't want the promiscuous, red pill men. I used to be that religious virgin woman. I gave all I had to my ex-husband and found out he was a cheater and also lied about having been a virgin before we married. He had been promiscuous. The double standards sicken me. I left religion and that crappy marriage.
You're very right about what you said. If men want a virgin, they should aim to be one, too. If they want to be promiscuous, they should accept that from their partners. I don't think many red pill guys know or talk to many real women. They seem to only talk to social media influencers and women that don't live like the majority of regular women.
i love that u can tell that u filmed this for tik tok too, are u just doing completely separate edits for each?
For this one yes, although I’m reconsidering for the future. The editing takes way longer than the filming!
Thanks for finding that chart. I'd already found the graph you show in your video.
Chart 15 showing % sexually active women as a function of non-marital sex partners has a rather obvious "cause and effect issue". This is the "cause" of an increase in on marital partners is having sex when you are not married. The denominator is "all sexually active women over 30". So, given that, the question is what number of lifetime marriage? Or number of sexual partners.
Clearly, "sexually active" women over 30 who are NOT married are very likely to be accumulating non-marital sexual partners and have been since they became sexually. In contrast, women who get married and remain married mostly do not accumulate non-marital sexual partners. ( Having a non-marital sexual partner while married generally results in divorce.)
So the "correlation" between "Not being in a stable marriage" and "having more nonmarital sexual partners" must be pushed toward positive for this reason. (And so "being in a stable marriage" and "having more nonmarital sexual partners" negative.) But this is not because having more sexual partners makes marriage less stable, but because being in a long term marriage reduced non-marital sexual partners!
Could having more sexual partners ALSO reduce marital bliss and stability? Sure. It's not an either or thing. But the metric illustrated in this particular graph is singularly deficient in teasing that out -- because there is a very obvious casual effect of *stable marriage* reduce the accumulation of *number of non-marital sexual partners* over time.
Yep... if N is number of non-marital sexual partners and X stable marriage: P(X|N) = P(N|X) * P(X)/P(N). So if the number of non-marital partners is larger for the unmarried than for the married (because they are, ahem, unmarried) then chart 15 will heve the general appearnce it has. (I'm a bit motivated to get the data and find P(N|X) and compare to (P(N|!X).
Thank you!!!! I’m a social worker and value true social research!! I hate when “research” is butchered and altered to fit a philosophy. Thank you for demonstrating everything wrong with this claim. ❤
Women responded as usual
id never seen your stuff before you showed up on my fyp, so i came here! love the long video 👍 very easily understood
Very interesting! Glad I subscribed to you a month ago!
Love this!! Definitely subscribed. Excited to see more!!!
The first one ? This was wonderful! Keep them coming
Does the Heritage Foundation have an agenda? Um do you?
My new favorite series!! Loved this!
I loved this!!! Please do more🥰 I absolutely adore and appreciate the detail!!❤❤❤
I'm a 35 year old virgin. Mostly, because I couldn't take the new wave of sexual freedom. I am not married, and I'm not happy at all.
This was great. Please do more deep dives and debunk videos on similar social media vids
Including topics such as the alpha, and beta crap, which reminds me of people who think they're furries or people relating heavily to astrology.
I think that woman got her story, from the book "rational male" by Tollo Tomassi.
Maybe that book mentioned sources, or maybe not. I dunno.
I really enjoyed this, it was very educational! Thank you for making this video! :)
This was amazing and I’m honestly excited to see what you’ll do in the future. Your ability to breakdown how data is interpreted is some thing I’m looking forward to better educate myself.
Liked. Shared. Subscribed. Please keep posting longer videos. Thanks.
there it is. Peer review journal. Who decides what belongs as a peer review journal? Consensus isn't science. Just the facts please.
This was so great! Definitely keep it up please!!!
Please don't stop doing videos like this one
I appreciate your scientific approach, and I reject "purity culture," but we do get good at whatever we practice. Thinking more partners than 4.8 equals promiscuity is absurd, but practicing disposable sex for several years means you accept that you are also disposable. 4.8 is a red herring. 30, 40, 70 is not.
Your attitude towards the subject matter is scientific? I guess it will resound with the female viewers who are living the modern free woman life the person is talking about. Good luck you may win a few
I really enjoyed the long form video
So you never debunked the correlation that more sex for women equates to less stable and happy relationships . You just said there was a correlation.
Keep them coming, excellent video.
This guy just said that more sexual partners lead to worse marriage. Fact that more sexual partners isn't the root couse, but not having your head srewed right doesn't matter.
Great job attempting to destroy the legitimate point she’s trying to make, Dr. Dipsh1t. 🤪
A lot of this was fair, and far more fair than I first expected when I listened and gave it a chance.
What I would really appreciate however, is an example whereby you ask if a liberal source "might have an agenda to push".
Id love to be proven wrong in my suspicion that there is no such example.
Another factor could be that men don't want to date hoes. While women don't really care about body count. So women tend to lie about their body count and eitherway that becomes an issue. So it might have nothing to do with "pair bonding", but more with what people desire in a partner.
Also, you just debunked every social study out there.
Ahhh, congratulations for managing to debunk noone. I was interested to see how wrong she was and the only thing you did was confirm her message. More than anything this video is an embarrassment to science
My female friend M stated to me that her now ex husband was sexual partner number 7 when she met him at age 21. My 2 male friends M and C have wives that never had sex and they married mid to late 20’s and are still together. No real strife at all. Just regular ups and downs. My female friend M to me has no love for her ex. Not hate, but no love and they were together for 20 yrs basically.
Great video, glad I found you
I saw another youtuber accurately find her source. 2015 and 2020 info. Your research is so off, hence your video is all wrong.
ruclips.net/video/LD_EhGeH7s4/видео.html
The memes and sound effects are distracting dawg
Just found this channel its amazing!
Prove her wrong bud, marry a 304.
I don't understand the point of the graph.. what were they trying to figure out?
We live in a stage "post factum"This is a great video ☝️. Keep up the good work. 🤞Pls can you direct me to the source video ?Only for study purposes & and broadening horizons.Thx
Sure! There's the link to it at the end of the first section in the article here: distilledscience.xyz/articles/does-having-more-sexual-partners-lower-your-chance-of-a-happy-marriage
Love it!! ❤
EXCELLENT video. Eagerly anticipating your future work, but of course make sure to rest!
Wow, you didn't disprove anything besides the fact that the correlation is not as strong as Pearl claimed.
Bravo....
Dude, you're super cool. Came from tiktok and enjoyed
LOVE this topic thank you for covering it and shutting these prudes down haha
Love the long form hope for me
There is no hope for you
Really think a lot of people watching this just getting their confirmation biases spoon fed to them.
Her data is coming from multiple sources including the heritage group but also physiology today and institute for family planning. This I'd a disingenuous unscientific debunk video.
So as a scienctist you think that men and women are the same? I'm getting very strong social science vibes from you bro. Maybe even gender studies!
So humans are not animals. That isn't scientific accurate and here you are calling out Pearl, not being a scientist
Man i love this content, please keep it up as im willing to watch more of this :)
Pearl is notorious for this. I’m still trying to decide if she’s intentionally misrepresenting the data and studies she “cites” or if she just regurgitating things she’s heard other people say and takes as fact. The way she uses casual and scientific terms interchangeably tells me she hasn’t actually parsed through the data herself to make sense of it
I know for sure us smart enough men still understood what she meant when she said unhappy marriages, we definitely thought of (likely to get divorced) he took everything literal with the happiness which is good, but that jus helps men to makes us more aware of women with high body counts, which is what I came to watch
@@beianimeyah24 you don’t get to claim to be the side of “facts over feelings” if your facts aren’t right. We’re not here for emotional pats on the back. We’re here to ground our thoughts and actions in reality. The second you let is slide on your slide you give ground to the opposition to do the same.
@@bigboma well I get to claim, that I’m on the side that is more likely correct than siding with those foolish women who come on the podcast, Pearl is more likely to be be closer to the the correct answer maybe not accurately but more than the women she goes up against, this guy jus shows how close she is to the accurate answer, so in that saying, are you gonna you vouch for someone who’s more likely to be right or more likely to be wrong? That’s if you were watching pearls original video and taking a side?
@@beianimeyah24 this is middle school level critical thinking. so you’re okay with using the same logic and the same tactics as the women you criticize? That’s on you. I’d that rather be factually correct and prove it, then just have an opinion because it makes me feel good. I don’t have to choose who’s “more than likely to be right” when I can just be right. Pearl chose a conclusion you agree with but supported it with misrepresented, non peer reviewed information. Which means she didn’t actually prove anything. And he dismantles it in this video. How about do the intellectual leg work
And support your opinions and conclusions with data that actually backs up how you feel?
Bro you need at least a million subscribers. People need to share the hell out of your page on their own social media Facebook and stuff.
This is real education. Not that conservative culture pseudo intellectual bullshit
Excellent video
I’d love to see u debate her
Certified data male 👍 love the video man
Love to see actual logic and science
YES good communication and good sex is the key to a happy marriage. 🥰
You can’t rule it out.
You should change your conclusions to - there isn’t any studies done to verified the video claims.
So your explanations are just as good as hers
Exactly! Saying there are no studies proving pair bonding does not logically demand the conclusion “it’s not a thing”. There were once no studies proving the earth is a sphere.
🤔 🤔🤔 if your content is so good.. why is your views and subscriptions so low…
Awesome analysis! Love this! Please make more! Science is fucking cool!!!!! Love, love, love things being broken down and seeking data to support! This video is great because it doesn’t pick a side it just shows us how to digest all the bullshit that can be out there to make an informed opinion about it.
When he calls a study that goes his way “comforting”…he’s picked a side.
I love this
I freaking love you!
Hey what if a girl collects marriage proposals and filters those proposals. After weeding out the proposals and chooses the right guy for marriage, will she just keep comparing the guy with all the other proposals. Is this comparable to having multiple sex partners? Can the girl still pair bond with her husband?
Instant sub!!
The people who need to see this will all refuse to watch
I have a question. Why do people still have sex? Sex is very gross, nasty, messy, and disgusting! I don't see how sex is a good thing. Why don't humans just remove sex from this world? Women can still get pregnant without sex (there's a lot of ways women can get pregnant without sex including artificial insemination). Sex does cause a lot of problems, so the world might be a much better place without it.
Im excited for some more long form deep dives! Great when sexist “facts” are debunked
The people who believe that the tools they learn to criticize journal articles, from simple correlation is not causation, to p-hacking their data, are the only esteemed methods of epistemology are the same idiots who wouldn’t bring a parachute to a skydiving jump due to a lack of doubled blind randomized studies 😂
She's just a pick-me girl. Her whole thing is bashing women and praising men.
thank you
Correlation = causality, right?? Right? Nope.
how can you compare someone that you had a 1 night stand with to some you dated lmao
😂😂😂
2k views with 700 subs? bro subscribe to this guy right now!
This man red pill the red pill.
thank you