@@Whateverpoopiepants thank you for explaining. I once actually got scammed by one of those double motor free energy designs. I thought if i give an input of 3 and run the motor the second motor will run in the same rpm and gove output of 3. So conncting them will give infinit energy.🤡 Now im learning a lot.
Magnets are the same as springs therefore it takes the same energy to pull the magnet away as the energy you got out of the magnet. Too understand this better imagine if this engine could run on springs instead of magnets.
More like batteries it takes a lot of energy to make a magnet but if you can siphon off that energy like this guy supposedly does you can make the energy very efficiently somewhere and then have it somewhere else like a car engine works a lot less efficient to make it you're Miles ahead
@@yonkromis7883 The energy needed to make a magnet is not at all overwhelming and only a small part of this energy is found in the magnet. For instance, the heat which is used in sintering does not stay in the magnet, it is lost when the peace cools again. Also don't forget, that when you buy a magnet you pay for all the energy which was needed in production and for much more. Thus the energy which could be expected from a magnet is much cheaper than a device using magnets. In addition, neither "this guy" nor any other guy can "siphon off" the energy of magnets. Permanent magnets keep their energy when they exercise forces, just as a spring they only offer "potential energy". To regard magnets as a storage of energy is totally wrong. Since their energy content is modest and their energy can't be extracted. In contrast, batteries are very efficient energy storage devices.
There are indeed way to siphon off that energy people on RUclips have demonstrated this. They just need a push start and then keep running for a long long time. Now whether you can siphon off much energy from them is a different story but at least they're running on their own indefinitely or until the magnets lose their power
He isn't pulling the magnet away, it's the repulsive force forcing the magnet away from it(from the top magnet as it aligns) and as it descends(with force, overcoming the opposite magnets weight) it pushes the opposite magnet piston up where there is no magnet on top. Thus no resistive force. ,Then the cycle repeats.
I have tried this configuration already, friction and binding at the gears was problematic. Perhaps with precision machined gears you might get it to work, but you will want to have the pistons aligned symmetrically so the forces are balanced.
Yukarıdaki mıknatısların aralarında bariyer demir levha konulması lazım. körleme yapılması gerekiyor. krank tam yukarı ulaşana dek karşı kuvvete maruz kalmamalı. teknik harici bir motor ile devamlı olarak üst tamburu çevirdiğinde, giren enerjiden + %5 fazladan enerji kazanımı oluşturmak mümkün.
Yep, eventually all forces will cancel/repel to the point of stopping the device. Then you will need "something else" to stop that and at that point you've fallen into the rabbit hole of "more and more" with each step adding to losses that need to be counteracted with less and less returns of efficiency (monetary, power, usefulness, etc.).
Too good to be true. Please share a practical application. Unless you are not sure enough or have enough moral courage to invest your time in making such an engine. Asking for approval isn't a great idea to be successful unless you have a pilot project to demonstrate some value that can be harnessed from a machine like that.
Top plate will get a repulsion from the piston magnet and will eventually stop. However, if the red magnet plate can be enforced to rotate in clock wise. But I am still scaptical about the amount of torque that can be retreiced from the shaft which is dependent on the powers of pistons.
Sir I have two questions 1. This is a Perpetual Motion Machine 2.0 and if I am not wrong Lenz Law is 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics in Electrodynamics domain which means to do mechancial work elecric/magnetic input will be required 2. Conversion of power from translational domain to rotation domain has more Losses then conversion directly to rotational domain as in case of motor
Instead of the plate rotating it could just be fixed placement and the changing of the negative to the positive electric magnet charges could have occur electronically in the exact same space where the pistons near contact is. So it's like the circles on top are electronic magnets that turn on and off to attract and repulse the pistons.
Can pretty much see directly into the pinnochio lying nostril set encrusted with the oberservable angle of incidental arrogance that remains aligning with ample willful ignorance.
I see it breaking down in the first 10 sec from start due to vibrations generated by the top plate with magnets (excentric). The pistons are also out of balance. Anyway, it is a cute computer simulation.
Could you give an example of any application where this is practical? It seems like youre just converting rotational energy to vertical energy and then back into rotational energy. Am I missing something?
I would only suggest that the design include one neodymium magnet, in an attractive position, in the center hole, opposed the other four. I believe that this arrangement will not only give the apparatus a necessary counter force, but will aid in giving the system balance. Looks very impressive and I look forward to hearing more on its development.
It won't work, but it's no use explaining that to someone who doesn't even know the basics of physics! After a few cycles, every such structure consumes the energy input from the outside at start-up and staggers to a halt at an equilibrium state!
@Community Resistance Trust me, I'm extremely astute in physics, but I I also know that it's more important to encourage free thinking and creativity. I'm well aware of the law of conservation of energy. People who are unaware of the basic laws of physics are on a path of discovery. It's idiots like yourself who impede progress based on the premise of being above everyone else who doesn't know everything. Let people learn and grow. That's how innovation and progress are made, through trial and error. Let the guy figure some things out. He may just come up with something new!
Interesting concept, has this been prototyped yet? Unfortunately a simulation is no comparison to physical reality, this is probably because we think like a simulation and assume an outcome. The amount of times I tried the physical arrangement and was disappointed because I convinced myself that it couldn’t fail. The only way to really know if the minds eye is seeing correctly, is small scale physical model, then go big when you see it with your own eyes. I have my fingers crossed for you, absolutely amazing animation by the way, a piece of art, I wish I could do that for some of my designs.
Simulations can be quite close to physical reality, but what is shown here is not a simulation but only an animation. An amazing one but still just an animation. There are many interesting concepts for perpetuum mobiles, but none of them work. Conservation of energy can't be tricked.
Hi @Science Freak This argument is always problematic, it's not about infinite energy, it's more about optimizing and developing new (hopefully open source minded) implementations of motors and generators. I like this one and hope to see more and maybe even support this idea. Thanks and best regards
@@marcelmartini1959 If you look at other videos of this channel - there are many - they all show machine designs which can't work, due to best confirmed laws of physics. The design in this video is no exception. And of course you always see animations only, never a running prototype. Which is no surprise since these machines can't run. A system can only output energy if it has an equivalent input of energy. There is no such input with this machine. Permanent magnets exercise forces but they are no energy source. I suggest before you support this idea get hold of a person knowledgeable in science, you will get a confirmation of my verdict. Perpetuum mobiles do not exist.
@@sciencefreak9070 @Science Freak Thanks for your valuable and nonviolant feedback. I totally agree that perpetuum mobiles are nothing what we should or need to discuss. However, I stay at my position of being open to new ideas. F.e. the whole hashtag "bs" about naming these videos something "free" or endless is somehow just a social convention to get more views/clicks, so I dont care. Anyway, its hard to read that "magnets exercise force but are no source of energy". I mean at least for a certain period it could be used as source of energy by using them in a generator setup. If this makes sense from an economical view is just interesting, because high precision parts could make an immense impact when measuring how long this can work and how much energy compared to input magnets or whatever as input. Best regards
In my view it is missing the right shielding material for the magnets... It will probably lock up and never move until you get any magnetic shielding materials in front of the magnets...
@@mimo4mimo11 Ongoing from 3:46 it is claimed, that research in permanent magnet technology will have a great potential. Which isn't true. Permanent magnets are unable to deliver energy, never mind if they are strong or weak. I don't know why you indicate this position of the video.
*The result of the Unaccounted Repulsion of Magnets is that The Magnet on The Piston also has a Repulsive Force which can make The Magnet that is above it Repulsed towards The Right and towards The Left with the same Repulsive Force so that The Engine will Stop Moving...*
The things that would allow it to kinda work would also induce a serious issue. I explain myself, i'm no graduate of anything so ijust piece things together with what i have eard about these subject. The thing that would greatly help would be a material that "insulate" the magnetic fields to the places you want them to act upon. The good news is that if i get things rigth, supra(or is it super) conductors make for a, if not the only, great barrier for magnetic fields. Ouray !!!. We can wrap things up and build an engine just like its explosion big bro. The problem ? The air, inside the "explosion" chambers. If it doesn't flow it's likely to heat due to the squihy action. Cooling will drain power from th engine. If it flow, well the frictions will drain power. So you'll need to couple that engine with one that work by converting heat to motion or outrigth electricity, both being known tech(if i'm not wrong). That would make it very cumbersome, for what output ? It may be durable and still a niche market for power source with looooong return on investment. Still a nice/pretty revamp of the Dynacam.
Nice design, but I think the rod would need to have ceramic bearings, carbon fiber rods, and even then there's still a lot of friction. It does look good on a computer screen,, not so much in practice. Friction equals heat equals demagnetization. And that's with out putting a load on it. It have seen similar prototypes, all fell victim to the same issues. It hope this one works out though because it makes me think of good Old American muscle car engines,
A regular brushless DC motor is best available to mankind right now since it's only one moving part so you should reduce all the moving parts in your engine to just one to come anywhere closer to competing with a DC motor.
I thought the same thing. Piston comes up as the magnet approaches would cause a repulsion before top dead center. However, an internal combustion engine does something similar as it is compressing the air. So, I don't know if it would be problematic or not.
How do you overcome the lateral cogging effect? Meaning that when you bring two N poles together laterally they force laterally away from each-other until the pass a certain point and they will then push against each other. I do believe that the force of top dead Center is stronger than the cogging force. So if your design didn’t depend on magnets being so close to each other it might work.
can you mount a reversed polarity upside-down mirrored pistons setup on this same control disc to counter act the axial force on the center shaft, and can double the potential power
A permanent magnet motor must not have bearings and must not depend on the earth's gravity. We also have no mention of how the movement will be transferred into useful energy or how we will control the speed of rotation. The concept is interesting and we all want such generators, although I would rather see generators that a person can set and then run for a certain time and then reload. It creates jobs for people and improves living conditions for all. For example, you put 40×5 kilogram weights at the beginning and the generator uses them in 24 hours and generates energy for the apartment, it would be ideal.
Hello mazid, i belive in perpetual motion, i also did experiment with magnetic strips, and conclude that Energy creation possible by using permanent magnet. off centre disk have more chance of countinous rotation. Do you use any simulation software ?
According to the laws of physics this engine could only begin to rotate if you first input some momentum yourself, and then if everything was perfect it would keep that rotational momentum untill you try to use it. But in reality it would stop spinning quickly due to friction and other restiances in play. In perfect enviroment you would get back same amount of energy that you put into it before. Basically, any universe which allows for such things cannot exist because if there is a possibility of energy buildup happening, then it would end up happening, which in turn would cause the universe itself to rip apart. Out of all probabilites which give rise to things, our universe is stable one, so just the fact that our universe does exist it means that it doesnt allow for such loopholes.
My thought is that while these can't run forever due to heat they might be excellent to run a generator to charge batteries. There are a lot of twelve volt applications that could use something like this for charging on an overcast day when solar panels are not efficient . I have 3 dc 12 volt appliances and am working on a setup to run my 5000 btu window ac in case my power went out. A device like this could work along with my solar setup.
May U believe it or not exactly this model I ve imagine 3yr. Back but I am not so much neat knowledge about the project...any way best wishes for you 👍👍
The upper rotating wheel with out magnets can't be void must have equal mass to the non magnet cylinders or would fall out of balance, need a filler material for those empty slots. Just an observation in the CGI model shown here inertia could be critical to this but nice model bruh for sure.
why not show more graphic details about each piston, rod, crankcase gears, and main gear at bottom center. Also show more about the three top heads with apparent magnets to oppose the magnets in your pistons. And why would you shoe a rotor with a north magnet opposite a south magnet, and with stator coils, which seem to have no connection to your illustration?
I just hope this will work. Not like the hoax from the guy in Turkey who swindled a many people. Look forward to see the real thing and not a rough design "This is an engineering point in the engine that was deliberately not observed " Good luck too.
Have you a link on this Turkish guy i saw him in Geneva 2014 inventors expo and he said machine broke down so figured it was just more click bait invest scam
I love this great technology and I believe it will work if we can sit and look in to the timing of the top magnet and the pistons. I will love this to come to reality but it has to do with a lot of time endurance ❤️
After 10 years research you come up with a design, which obviously can't and doesn't work? You should have used two of the ten years to study physics! This would have spared you eigth years.
@@shiningirisheyes No, this is not possible. A system can multiply force, any lever can do that, but no system can multiply energy. If output power (power in the sense of energy per time) is five times bigger than input power you could use a fifth of the output energy as input and you would still a system which produces energy without an input of external energy. That's not possible.
Rare earth magnets, (like neodymium) are quite cost prohibitive in bigger quantities or sizes. Definitley not aplicable for factory production, especially, when the engine (except using exotic fuel needed to be changed only few times per decade) does not provide any new properties to the engine (past the "fuel" thing). The magnets to gain the magnetic properties, need to be zapped by abundance of electricity. It is a qestion, if "natural" magnets were not hit sometime past, by say lighting. Eitherway creating new, or "remagneting" old might be quite energeticaly costly enevour. Magnetic fields are not narrow tubes originating from the magnet poles. Real thing would probably work bit differently than your graphic. How do you start and off your engine? Only way i see there is to pull out the covering ring. For smaller mechanical complexity of the engine, you can use for the rise of the heads either spring(s), or hydrostatic preasure Good luck with
It looks interesting... But once again he encounters the force of repulsion when raising the piston... will be returned....and will not move forward... regardless of the mass. What I see... is that you need is to put the 4 magnets. those at the top of the disc in a staggered way in power ... that is to say graduate power 1 2 3 4 in strength.... but you can never get it out of the dead place and it will be coming back and the acceleration mass... It won't help much.
They may be super believable, but none of these devices work in reality. The author ignores basic laws of physics. And he never shows a prototype, only one animation after the other. It appears almost that he knows that his devices can't work since he never tries to build and show a prototype.
@@durchblick9505 yes, it was sarcasm. Because using animation and believable in the same sentence is kind of the problem, It's just animation, nothing more. lala land
your system depends on the strength of the repulsion of the magnetic field to function efficiently. It looks like you come from India, your people would use your design. Well, if you place a permanent magnet on the circular magnets that rotate, it will be achieved, by action of the movement of said magnets (also permanent), that the magnetic intensity increases. So, the faster the circular magnets spin, the greater the intensity of repulsion they will acquire. The permanent magnet that you place must not move and must cover, as if it were a lid, both the empty circular openings and those that contain the permanent magnets.That would be enough to increase its magnetic intensity and its effectiveness. ps: it is obvious that it uses a manual start, that's why I say that it would be very useful for the population in india lacking in energy.
I am Iranian Thank you for taking the time to watch our video and for sharing your thoughts on the magnetic field repulsion in our system. We appreciate your suggestion to place a permanent magnet on the circular magnets to increase the magnetic intensity and repulsion. While your idea sounds intriguing, we have carefully designed our system to achieve the desired functionality and efficiency. Altering the design by introducing additional permanent magnets may have unforeseen effects on the overall performance and stability of the system. As developers, we strive to ensure the reliability and safety of our designs before implementing any modifications. We appreciate your concern for the energy needs in India and other parts of the world. Our goal is to create innovative and sustainable solutions to address such challenges. We continuously explore ways to optimize our system and make it more accessible to different regions, including areas with limited energy resources. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them with us.
If we're talking *"engines,"* a permanent magnet engine wouldn't produce nearly enough torque to move a load. You've basically designed a generator less the coils. This design would also fail from the additional friction and efficiency loss from unnecessary moving parts bcz magnet coil generators and motors are already as simple as you can get. More complexity doesn't always equal more better. Whereas an electromagnet configuration could regulate voltage strength and thus torque and speed on a load and can conversely be turned down or off when not needed.
Can you make the uper plate in a scale shape that the 2,3,4 magnet will have the same distance from the piston as the first so the pushing power beetwin the magnets will be stronger?
To Gentjan Hasani : Hi, I think it is is a brilliant idea in order to increase the force applied to the piston by the strength of a magnetic force. On the other hand , if the design remains as it is I think that the displacement of the piston is to long and he gains nothing from the magnet in the last space of his movement from highest point to lower point. Adrian
Y si pudiera atraer y repeler? Es decir cuando esté en el punto muerto superior repeler y en el punto muerto inferior atraer para evitar puntos muertos?
I been studying this topic for 20+ years and for the longest it looks like it works but it doesn't but I have found one that does work heat pipes in computers google that build one different same technology water in a vacuum forced to stay in a gas State due to fact water boils in space but in that state if you make a cold spot anywhere in there liquid water will form lower the gas pressure in that area so it forces the warmer water to boil and that's heavy so basically it's a way or raising water with bar minimum power really shade will do but the taller it is the further water falls and the more energy it outputs for the same input and you don't need to go up you can go down use geothermal energy suck the heat from the earth
Far too expensive to generate the basic materials before they are even formed into final shapes useful for assembling. Then if that is overcome and if friction is overcome , then how many actual joules of energy will be available to power things like cars, generators, hand tools, fans, etc. If it were only possible. Perhaps in space where gravity is less of a battle, mmm perhaps
Is the unmentioned design cue that 4/7 of the wheel on top is magnetized against 5 pistons? Kinda seems random until one starts delving into pressure wave harmonics and compares them to magnetic field passes. If this concept can work, rotational rhythm is the secret sauce, and most people don’t have the patience to keep experimenting with different rhythms of passes. According to Genesis 1, YEHOVAH made all energies, space, land, and life forms out of his spoken frequencies. If this machine doesn’t stop spinning, it next needs enough torque to overcome stable resistance from a generator. It’s not the type of engine that could survive dynamic loads without a really heavy flywheel or a clever and complicated ultracapacitor system loop. It’s best application is for energy generation and not for a changing work environment. I do know that one would certainly not want the opposing magnets’ count to match. Let’s see the prototype in action.
Seriously, another perpetual motion video!? I can't believe people are buying into this. Even the guy making this video knows it's bs, but he'll make money on this video, and that's all he cares about. He doesn't care that he's tricking people who are none the wiser. Guys like this make me sick. I clicked on this video thinking it might actually be something interesting, and now regret giving his video another view
I WOULD LUV IF THIS WORKED BUT gears and gear mesh creates interesting friction so my money is on it will after getting push started grind to a halt. However this might work as force multiper eg one kilowatt input electrivc power to keep it turning returning 5 kilowatt power output thrn it would still be usefull. THAT IF IT HAPPENS IS OVERUNITY and is not breaking laws of physics as it is power invested into large magnets being returned to the normal physics heat friction light sound world . ITbWOULD BE GOOD TO SEE SMALL working model if you can to prove it can do both non stop power output and multiply power inputs .Thanks even if it fails we learn what cant work which is true science we must expect many failures before the break throughs
I like it's simplicity. There's a Korean engine powered by magnets that I thought was very powerful and impressive though complex in its design. These companies that makes these magnets one would think would be developing a product of their own but something is stopping them. An Israeli alternator was very impressive once you got it spinning. Is it the disruptive technology law that prevents this from being everywhere? Is this the machine Nikolai Tesla was developing that would put Edison electric out of business thus ending Tesla's career? An illegal engine according to the Standard Oil at the time. We would have never experienced the carbon dioxide dilemma we face today had these been allowed to be produced.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the video! It's interesting to hear about other powerful and impressive engines powered by magnets, and it's understandable to wonder why these companies aren't developing their own products. As for whether disruptive technology laws are preventing this from being everywhere, it's difficult to say without more information on the specific laws and regulations involved. However, it's worth noting that bringing new technologies to market can often face significant obstacles, such as high development costs, regulatory hurdles, and entrenched interests in existing industries. Regarding the machine that Nikolai Tesla was developing, it's possible that you're referring to his work on wireless energy transmission, which he believed could revolutionize the way we generate and distribute electricity. While Tesla's ideas were certainly ahead of their time, it's unlikely that they alone would have put Edison Electric out of business or ended Tesla's career. The history of technology is often much more complex than individual inventors and their inventions. Finally, it's worth noting that while new energy technologies may offer potential solutions to our current carbon dioxide dilemma, there are still many challenges to be overcome in terms of scaling up production, improving efficiency, and integrating them into existing energy systems. Nonetheless, it's important to continue exploring new ideas and technologies that can help us transition to a more sustainable future.
@@Energygraphy Check out CERBRAS. Each core, a super computer. 680,000 cores per old fashioned 5nm etch on the 8.5 inch wafer size chip. 3nm now being built by their partner TSMC. George Babbitt envisioned building such a machine in 1859, lamenting it would be larger than the United States. He's settled on the smaller application version the Babbage machine. And Moore's law has been working since then. And they're putting these words into computers the size of old-fashioned cray supercomputers that operated an astonishing 90 MHz per second. Its operating so fast I can't explain the number of their new machine. There's simply trying to create singularity. In ten years this too will fit into a bread box. Allow Cerebras a second with your invention with the 3D printer ready. Same thing, yet unrecognizable, smaller and much more powerful then expected, a Castle Bravo moment. That's the first thing and really the only thing I want AI to help me. I like your invention but I wonder with six trillion simulated hours of testing is there anything you would change? CEREBRAS is another interesting development to revelations yet unknown. One board operate the predictive speed in the supercomputer has many boards to which I don't yet have more details from their page. One interesting fact is they're speeding up processing by eliminating the zeros somewhere along the processes. The cooling is 3D constructed within the 44,000 watt 8,5 wafer chip supercomputers and small enough to sit next to your desk. Perhaps a new pathway for district heating. 10 boards can meet the skyscraper's heating & hot water requirements? Hal 9000 has arrived and will not open the pod bay door because it never has made a mistake. Machines like these need machines like yours. Now I'm not so sure if it's a good idea or just what we need to conquer the universe.
Sitting in front of a computer, using fancy software, it is VERY EASY to come up with such UTOPIAN concepts and flashy ideas. Your presentation proves NOTHING and presently, it is just a waste of time, but fascinating to view, no doubt. Thank you.
Magnet piston grade might need to be weaker than the rotor magnet grade to prevent lockup? None of these ideas ever end up working. Although, the idea and rendition are awesome!
The real difference between a DC motor and a magnet motor: DC motors get via e-magnets an input of electrical energy, which is transformed to mechanical energy. The permanent magnets only assist in this transformation, but no energy comes from them. In contrast, with a motor using only permanent magnets there is no energy input, since permanent magnets exercise forces but are not a source of continuous energy, they only deliver potential energy. This is the reason why magnet motors are not possible. The first design for a magnet motor stems back to the 13 century! But of course it never worked, no permanent motor design ever worked, and the design shown here does of course not work also. The claim that magnet motors are an emergent field of research is nonsense.
🧲 There is a very strong sticky spot in your design. Things always look better in animation until you build it. Since I can’t post a diagram of your sticky spot, you’ll just have to build it and see for yourself.
NEW Version
ruclips.net/video/6In5Oo_F1TA/видео.html
According to the number of emails received for making a prototype of this model, I will definitely make it soon...
@@philippeniel9366 thank you dear Philippe. Please email me
majidelahi7@gmail.com
That looks awesome on a vid. Sadly it doesn’t work in reality.
CORRECT⚠️ Because it has a nasty sticky spot in its design.
@@JustChillingOut please explain.
@@monke-i2i
The friction of all that stuff is not in any way efficient.
@@Whateverpoopiepants thank you for explaining. I once actually got scammed by one of those double motor free energy designs. I thought if i give an input of 3 and run the motor the second motor will run in the same rpm and gove output of 3. So conncting them will give infinit energy.🤡
Now im learning a lot.
@@monke-i2i To be more precise, the force that push the piston down would oppose the spinning of the disc until it stops. No net energy is generated.
Magnets are the same as springs therefore it takes the same energy to pull the magnet away as the energy you got out of the magnet. Too understand this better imagine if this engine could run on springs instead of magnets.
And even if it was 100 efficient in a vacuum friction still would stop it.
More like batteries it takes a lot of energy to make a magnet but if you can siphon off that energy like this guy supposedly does you can make the energy very efficiently somewhere and then have it somewhere else like a car engine works a lot less efficient to make it you're Miles ahead
@@yonkromis7883 The energy needed to make a magnet is not at all overwhelming and only a small part of this energy is found in the magnet. For instance, the heat which is used in sintering does not stay in the magnet, it is lost when the peace cools again. Also don't forget, that when you buy a magnet you pay for all the energy which was needed in production and for much more. Thus the energy which could be expected from a magnet is much cheaper than a device using magnets. In addition, neither "this guy" nor any other guy can "siphon off" the energy of magnets. Permanent magnets keep their energy when they exercise forces, just as a spring they only offer "potential energy".
To regard magnets as a storage of energy is totally wrong. Since their energy content is modest and their energy can't be extracted. In contrast, batteries are very efficient energy storage devices.
There are indeed way to siphon off that energy people on RUclips have demonstrated this. They just need a push start and then keep running for a long long time. Now whether you can siphon off much energy from them is a different story but at least they're running on their own indefinitely or until the magnets lose their power
He isn't pulling the magnet away, it's the repulsive force forcing the magnet away from it(from the top magnet as it aligns) and as it descends(with force, overcoming the opposite magnets weight) it pushes the opposite magnet piston up where there is no magnet on top. Thus no resistive force. ,Then the cycle repeats.
I have tried this configuration already, friction and binding at the gears was problematic. Perhaps with precision machined gears you might get it to work, but you will want to have the pistons aligned symmetrically so the forces are balanced.
Too much friction for even perpetual motion.
Yukarıdaki mıknatısların aralarında bariyer demir levha konulması lazım. körleme yapılması gerekiyor. krank tam yukarı ulaşana dek karşı kuvvete maruz kalmamalı.
teknik harici bir motor ile devamlı olarak üst tamburu çevirdiğinde, giren enerjiden + %5 fazladan enerji kazanımı oluşturmak mümkün.
Looking forward to the look on your face when you build the prototype with "10 years" of R&D.
the reciprocating magnets will lock with each other as they move past each other
I also think so but it might work well as force multiplier eg 1 power input result 5 power out put
@@shiningirisheyes Force multiplier? Or energy multiplier? Never heard of.
It will collapse no doubt 😂😂😂
Yep, eventually all forces will cancel/repel to the point of stopping the device. Then you will need "something else" to stop that and at that point you've fallen into the rabbit hole of "more and more" with each step adding to losses that need to be counteracted with less and less returns of efficiency (monetary, power, usefulness, etc.).
The way that the engine is designed is OK just more space between the cylinders will work better.
Too good to be true. Please share a practical application. Unless you are not sure enough or have enough moral courage to invest your time in making such an engine.
Asking for approval isn't a great idea to be successful unless you have a pilot project to demonstrate some value that can be harnessed from a machine like that.
Top plate will get a repulsion from the piston magnet and will eventually stop. However, if the red magnet plate can be enforced to rotate in clock wise.
But I am still scaptical about the amount of torque that can be retreiced from the shaft which is dependent on the powers of pistons.
Sir I have two questions
1. This is a Perpetual Motion Machine 2.0 and if I am not wrong Lenz Law is 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics in Electrodynamics domain which means to do mechancial work elecric/magnetic input will be required
2. Conversion of power from translational domain to rotation domain has more Losses then conversion directly to rotational domain as in case of motor
Instead of the plate rotating it could just be fixed placement and the changing of the negative to the positive electric magnet charges could have occur electronically in the exact same space where the pistons near contact is. So it's like the circles on top are electronic magnets that turn on and off to attract and repulse the pistons.
There are ways to turn permanent magnets off
Look up Magblocks
why using reciprocating piston like in ice? friction losses at gearing? what estimated rpm?
Great job as usual. Thank you for sharing with us those amazing ideas. I can wait to see the prototype. Congrats from Romania 😊
❤❤ soon
@@Energygraphy it won't work, the gears will block each other
Can pretty much see directly into the pinnochio lying nostril set encrusted with the oberservable angle of incidental arrogance that remains aligning with ample willful ignorance.
I see it breaking down in the first 10 sec from start due to vibrations generated by the top plate with magnets (excentric). The pistons are also out of balance.
Anyway, it is a cute computer simulation.
If you were to wrap copper wire around piston area would this become a generator
Could you give an example of any application where this is practical? It seems like youre just converting rotational energy to vertical energy and then back into rotational energy. Am I missing something?
I appreciate you sir, Weldon....
I would only suggest that the design include one neodymium magnet, in an attractive position, in the center hole, opposed the other four. I believe that this arrangement will not only give the apparatus a necessary counter force, but will aid in giving the system balance. Looks very impressive and I look forward to hearing more on its development.
It won't work, but it's no use explaining that to someone who doesn't even know the basics of physics! After a few cycles, every such structure consumes the energy input from the outside at start-up and staggers to a halt at an equilibrium state!
None of this is going to work.
@Community Resistance Trust me, I'm extremely astute in physics, but I I also know that it's more important to encourage free thinking and creativity.
I'm well aware of the law of conservation of energy. People who are unaware of the basic laws of physics are on a path of discovery. It's idiots like yourself who impede progress based on the premise of being above everyone else who doesn't know everything. Let people learn and grow. That's how innovation and progress are made, through trial and error. Let the guy figure some things out. He may just come up with something new!
Very well said. Respect your thoughts.
Ideas shall never be discouraged.
@@amitRsambare Bad ideas absolutely should be discouraged.
That is a great idea for a light source.👍👍👍
Interesting concept, has this been prototyped yet? Unfortunately a simulation is no comparison to physical reality, this is probably because we think like a simulation and assume an outcome. The amount of times I tried the physical arrangement and was disappointed because I convinced myself that it couldn’t fail. The only way to really know if the minds eye is seeing correctly, is small scale physical model, then go big when you see it with your own eyes.
I have my fingers crossed for you, absolutely amazing animation by the way, a piece of art, I wish I could do that for some of my designs.
Simulations can be quite close to physical reality, but what is shown here is not a simulation but only an animation. An amazing one but still just an animation. There are many interesting concepts for perpetuum mobiles, but none of them work. Conservation of energy can't be tricked.
Hi @Science Freak
This argument is always problematic, it's not about infinite energy, it's more about optimizing and developing new (hopefully open source minded) implementations of motors and generators. I like this one and hope to see more and maybe even support this idea. Thanks and best regards
@@marcelmartini1959 If you look at other videos of this channel - there are many - they all show machine designs which can't work, due to best confirmed laws of physics. The design in this video is no exception. And of course you always see animations only, never a running prototype. Which is no surprise since these machines can't run. A system can only output energy if it has an equivalent input of energy. There is no such input with this machine. Permanent magnets exercise forces but they are no energy source. I suggest before you support this idea get hold of a person knowledgeable in science, you will get a confirmation of my verdict. Perpetuum mobiles do not exist.
@@sciencefreak9070 @Science Freak Thanks for your valuable and nonviolant feedback. I totally agree that perpetuum mobiles are nothing what we should or need to discuss. However, I stay at my position of being open to new ideas. F.e. the whole hashtag "bs" about naming these videos something "free" or endless is somehow just a social convention to get more views/clicks, so I dont care.
Anyway, its hard to read that "magnets exercise force but are no source of energy". I mean at least for a certain period it could be used as source of energy by using them in a generator setup. If this makes sense from an economical view is just interesting, because high precision parts could make an immense impact when measuring how long this can work and how much energy compared to input magnets or whatever as input.
Best regards
In my view it is missing the right shielding material for the magnets...
It will probably lock up and never move until you get any magnetic shielding materials in front of the magnets...
What is an effective magnetic shielding technique
Great ideas as always
I wish the best for you
Thank you
"There is an engineering point in the device that was deliberately not considered. Please write your thoughts on this in the comments."
Conservation of energy?
@@heinzpg 3:46
@@mimo4mimo11 Ongoing from 3:46 it is claimed, that research in permanent magnet technology will have a great potential. Which isn't true. Permanent magnets are unable to deliver energy, never mind if they are strong or weak. I don't know why you indicate this position of the video.
*The result of the Unaccounted Repulsion of Magnets is that The Magnet on The Piston also has a Repulsive Force which can make The Magnet that is above it Repulsed towards The Right and towards The Left with the same Repulsive Force so that The Engine will Stop Moving...*
Где спрятал батарею,и где импульс и блок управления подключается.
You haven't really invented it yet until u make the physical item. You have conceived of an idea
The only thing this generates is possibly a small amount of ad revenue, but judging by the view count, not even that.
Tru dat 🥸🤣🤣🤣
The things that would allow it to kinda work would also induce a serious issue.
I explain myself, i'm no graduate of anything so ijust piece things together with what i have eard about these subject.
The thing that would greatly help would be a material that "insulate" the magnetic fields to the places you want them to act upon.
The good news is that if i get things rigth, supra(or is it super) conductors make for a, if not the only, great barrier for magnetic fields.
Ouray !!!. We can wrap things up and build an engine just like its explosion big bro.
The problem ? The air, inside the "explosion" chambers.
If it doesn't flow it's likely to heat due to the squihy action. Cooling will drain power from th engine.
If it flow, well the frictions will drain power.
So you'll need to couple that engine with one that work by converting heat to motion or outrigth electricity, both being known tech(if i'm not wrong). That would make it very cumbersome, for what output ?
It may be durable and still a niche market for power source with looooong return on investment.
Still a nice/pretty revamp of the Dynacam.
the attractive and repulsive magnetic energy of the magnets is not permanent.....it will slowly decrease...
Can you spot why this won’t work? Also, for extra credit can you explain why if this did somehow work why it would explode? 🤔
Nice design, but I think the rod would need to have ceramic bearings, carbon fiber rods, and even then there's still a lot of friction. It does look good on a computer screen,, not so much in practice. Friction equals heat equals demagnetization. And that's with out putting a load on it. It have seen similar prototypes, all fell victim to the same issues. It hope this one works out though because it makes me think of good Old American muscle car engines,
magnets always compensate for forces with any engine design, but go for it, maybe you can do it.
A regular brushless DC motor is best available to mankind right now since it's only one moving part so you should reduce all the moving parts in your engine to just one to come anywhere closer to competing with a DC motor.
Fantastic!
How hard do you think you'll need to turn the magnets disk, as they get close to the pistons and repel the piston magnets?
I thought the same thing. Piston comes up as the magnet approaches would cause a repulsion before top dead center. However, an internal combustion engine does something similar as it is compressing the air. So, I don't know if it would be problematic or not.
How do you overcome the lateral cogging effect? Meaning that when you bring two N poles together laterally they force laterally away from each-other until the pass a certain point and they will then push against each other. I do believe that the force of top dead Center is stronger than the cogging force. So if your design didn’t depend on magnets being so close to each other it might work.
I like the circolar shape, looks so elegant.
can you mount a reversed polarity upside-down mirrored pistons setup on this same control disc to counter act the axial force on the center shaft, and can double the potential power
A permanent magnet motor must not have bearings and must not depend on the earth's gravity. We also have no mention of how the movement will be transferred into useful energy or how we will control the speed of rotation. The concept is interesting and we all want such generators, although I would rather see generators that a person can set and then run for a certain time and then reload. It creates jobs for people and improves living conditions for all. For example, you put 40×5 kilogram weights at the beginning and the generator uses them in 24 hours and generates energy for the apartment, it would be ideal.
Hello mazid, i belive in perpetual motion, i also did experiment with magnetic strips, and conclude that Energy creation possible by using permanent magnet. off centre disk have more chance of countinous rotation. Do you use any simulation software ?
Hola atlast i got to see my past thought of making like this one in my marticulation ,but you made it ,ty.❤
Where does the process get it's start. I don't think this is a model that takes advantage of zero point energy.
According to the laws of physics this engine could only begin to rotate if you first input some momentum yourself, and then if everything was perfect it would keep that rotational momentum untill you try to use it. But in reality it would stop spinning quickly due to friction and other restiances in play. In perfect enviroment you would get back same amount of energy that you put into it before. Basically, any universe which allows for such things cannot exist because if there is a possibility of energy buildup happening, then it would end up happening, which in turn would cause the universe itself to rip apart. Out of all probabilites which give rise to things, our universe is stable one, so just the fact that our universe does exist it means that it doesnt allow for such loopholes.
Fantastic.
How fast can the upper disk revolve, and what is max power output?
-As fast as you want
-Something less than power put in
My thought is that while these can't run forever due to heat they might be excellent to run a generator to charge batteries.
There are a lot of twelve volt applications that could use something like this for charging on an overcast day when solar panels are not efficient .
I have 3 dc 12 volt appliances and am working on a setup to run my 5000 btu window ac in case my power went out.
A device like this could work along with my solar setup.
This looks like a magnetic overunity 2 stroke that taps ZPE.
Is this supposed to be a perpetual motion machine? What is the driver for this engine? If there's nothing but magnets then it wouldn't work.
Are you thinking perpetual motion?
May U believe it or not exactly this model I ve imagine 3yr. Back but I am not so much neat knowledge about the project...any way best wishes for you 👍👍
The upper rotating wheel with out magnets can't be void must have equal mass to the non magnet cylinders or would fall out of balance, need a filler material for those empty slots. Just an observation in the CGI model shown here inertia could be critical to this but nice model bruh for sure.
At first observation look like it could work, but I'm sure the problems are in the details.
why not show more graphic details about each piston, rod, crankcase gears, and main gear at bottom center. Also show more about the three top heads with apparent magnets to oppose the magnets in your pistons. And why would you shoe a rotor with a north magnet opposite a south magnet, and with stator coils, which seem to have no connection to your illustration?
I just hope this will work. Not like the hoax from the guy in Turkey who swindled a many people. Look forward to see the real thing and not a rough design "This is an engineering point in the engine that was deliberately not observed " Good luck too.
Have you a link on this Turkish guy i saw him in Geneva 2014 inventors expo and he said machine broke down so figured it was just more click bait invest scam
@@shiningirisheyes I will look and get back to you fella.
Stop hoping, it doesnt work...electric motors use this principle except one set of magnets have to be electromagnets.
you genius doc... you should register those ideas belong your name
Awesome and great idea
I love this great technology and I believe it will work if we can sit and look in to the timing of the top magnet and the pistons. I will love this to come to reality but it has to do with a lot of time endurance ❤️
After 10 years research you come up with a design, which obviously can't and doesn't work? You should have used two of the ten years to study physics! This would have spared you eigth years.
@heinzpg: Well, he apparently solved on problem: How to use electric motors and still need oil changes. 😂
I also think so this cant work with no input power but it might work well as force multiplier eg 1 power input result 5 power out put
@@shiningirisheyes No, this is not possible. A system can multiply force, any lever can do that, but no system can multiply energy. If output power (power in the sense of energy per time) is five times bigger than input power you could use a fifth of the output energy as input and you would still a system which produces energy without an input of external energy. That's not possible.
Rare earth magnets, (like neodymium) are quite cost prohibitive in bigger quantities or sizes. Definitley not aplicable for factory production, especially, when the engine (except using exotic fuel needed to be changed only few times per decade) does not provide any new properties to the engine (past the "fuel" thing).
The magnets to gain the magnetic properties, need to be zapped by abundance of electricity. It is a qestion, if "natural" magnets were not hit sometime past, by say lighting. Eitherway creating new, or "remagneting" old might be quite energeticaly costly enevour.
Magnetic fields are not narrow tubes originating from the magnet poles. Real thing would probably work bit differently than your graphic.
How do you start and off your engine? Only way i see there is to pull out the covering ring.
For smaller mechanical complexity of the engine, you can use for the rise of the heads either spring(s), or hydrostatic preasure
Good luck with
Lubrication will be required, a flywheel and a starting spin and there is no way to control the speed.
It looks interesting... But once again he encounters the force of repulsion when raising the piston... will be returned....and will not move forward... regardless of the mass. What I see... is that you need is to put the
4 magnets. those at the top of the disc in a staggered way in power ... that is to say graduate power 1 2 3 4 in strength.... but you can never get it out of the dead place and it will be coming back and the acceleration mass... It won't help much.
Oh My Gosh, another one...
WOW these animations are super believable
They may be super believable, but none of these devices work in reality. The author ignores basic laws of physics. And he never shows a prototype, only one animation after the other. It appears almost that he knows that his devices can't work since he never tries to build and show a prototype.
@@durchblick9505 yes, it was sarcasm. Because using animation and believable in the same sentence is kind of the problem, It's just animation, nothing more. lala land
may it work under load? ... regards from turkey
❤❤رائع جدا إستمر يا بطل..ربنا يوفقك.كل عام وانتم بخير.. كل الحب والتحية من فلسطين ❤❤❤❤❤
I'm waiting to see it soon
your system depends on the strength of the repulsion of the magnetic field to function efficiently. It looks like you come from India, your people would use your design. Well, if you place a permanent magnet on the circular magnets that rotate, it will be achieved, by action of the movement of said magnets (also permanent), that the magnetic intensity increases. So, the faster the circular magnets spin, the greater the intensity of repulsion they will acquire. The permanent magnet that you place must not move and must cover, as if it were a lid, both the empty circular openings and those that contain the permanent magnets.That would be enough to increase its magnetic intensity and its effectiveness. ps: it is obvious that it uses a manual start, that's why I say that it would be very useful for the population in india lacking in energy.
I am Iranian
Thank you for taking the time to watch our video and for sharing your thoughts on the magnetic field repulsion in our system. We appreciate your suggestion to place a permanent magnet on the circular magnets to increase the magnetic intensity and repulsion.
While your idea sounds intriguing, we have carefully designed our system to achieve the desired functionality and efficiency. Altering the design by introducing additional permanent magnets may have unforeseen effects on the overall performance and stability of the system. As developers, we strive to ensure the reliability and safety of our designs before implementing any modifications.
We appreciate your concern for the energy needs in India and other parts of the world. Our goal is to create innovative and sustainable solutions to address such challenges. We continuously explore ways to optimize our system and make it more accessible to different regions, including areas with limited energy resources.
If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them with us.
If we're talking *"engines,"* a permanent magnet engine wouldn't produce nearly enough torque to move a load. You've basically designed a generator less the coils. This design would also fail from the additional friction and efficiency loss from unnecessary moving parts bcz magnet coil generators and motors are already as simple as you can get. More complexity doesn't always equal more better. Whereas an electromagnet configuration could regulate voltage strength and thus torque and speed on a load and can conversely be turned down or off when not needed.
free energy is possible bro but we need more reserch. i am also trying for free energy, we need a correctt direction for magnit
It's very excited infinity ♾️♾️ free Energy to everyone by using permanent Magnet Engine...
The video: "I have invented... [blah, blah...]
Me: estimating the inefficiency of all those gears, crankshafts, and connecting rods...
Y como controlan las revoluciones? Se sobrec alientan por fricción como lo solucionan?
wait for the prototype
Interesting question .
Does this work by magnetic flux into electricity ?
Can you make the uper plate in a scale shape that the 2,3,4 magnet will have the same distance from the piston as the first so the pushing power beetwin the magnets will be stronger?
To Gentjan Hasani : Hi, I think it is is a brilliant idea in order to increase the force applied to the piston by the strength of a magnetic force. On the other hand
, if the design remains as it is I think that the displacement of the piston is to long and he gains nothing from the magnet in the last space of his movement from highest point to lower point. Adrian
Y si pudiera atraer y repeler? Es decir cuando esté en el punto muerto superior repeler y en el punto muerto inferior atraer para evitar puntos muertos?
What's the achievement from RUclips videos....??
Why don't get patent....???
Only Views target video...and... making us fool....
So what are pistons for in an electric motor?
A bubbler for the world's largest aquarium Maybe
I been studying this topic for 20+ years and for the longest it looks like it works but it doesn't but I have found one that does work heat pipes in computers google that build one different same technology water in a vacuum forced to stay in a gas State due to fact water boils in space but in that state if you make a cold spot anywhere in there liquid water will form lower the gas pressure in that area so it forces the warmer water to boil and that's heavy so basically it's a way or raising water with bar minimum power really shade will do but the taller it is the further water falls and the more energy it outputs for the same input and you don't need to go up you can go down use geothermal energy suck the heat from the earth
Obviously, you messed up by not having offset pistons, as well as the lack of supercooled Osmium.
بنظرم بهتر بود در دو خانه از سه خانهء خالی آهنربا با قطب معکوس قرار میدادید
بر افزایش گشتاور تاثیر بیشتری میگذاشت و احتمال قفل شدن نامحتملتر بود
براساس آزمایشات قبلی، این کار باعث میشود که منطقه قفل قویتر شود...
how the top side will turn ?
Far too expensive to generate the basic materials before they are even formed into final shapes useful for assembling. Then if that is overcome and if friction is overcome , then how many actual joules of energy will be available to power things like cars, generators, hand tools, fans, etc. If it were only possible. Perhaps in space where gravity is less of a battle, mmm perhaps
Who needs physics, we've got magic. 🤣
Is the unmentioned design cue that 4/7 of the wheel on top is magnetized against 5 pistons? Kinda seems random until one starts delving into pressure wave harmonics and compares them to magnetic field passes. If this concept can work, rotational rhythm is the secret sauce, and most people don’t have the patience to keep experimenting with different rhythms of passes. According to Genesis 1, YEHOVAH made all energies, space, land, and life forms out of his spoken frequencies. If this machine doesn’t stop spinning, it next needs enough torque to overcome stable resistance from a generator. It’s not the type of engine that could survive dynamic loads without a really heavy flywheel or a clever and complicated ultracapacitor system loop. It’s best application is for energy generation and not for a changing work environment. I do know that one would certainly not want the opposing magnets’ count to match. Let’s see the prototype in action.
Seriously, another perpetual motion video!? I can't believe people are buying into this. Even the guy making this video knows it's bs, but he'll make money on this video, and that's all he cares about. He doesn't care that he's tricking people who are none the wiser. Guys like this make me sick. I clicked on this video thinking it might actually be something interesting, and now regret giving his video another view
So perpetual motion and energy do exist ???
Because in school they taught us in physics you can't get something from nothing
I WOULD LUV IF THIS WORKED BUT gears and gear mesh creates interesting friction so my money is on it will after getting push started grind to a halt. However this might work as force multiper eg one kilowatt input electrivc power to keep it turning returning 5 kilowatt power output thrn it would still be usefull. THAT IF IT HAPPENS IS OVERUNITY and is not breaking laws of physics as it is power invested into large magnets being returned to the normal physics heat friction light sound world . ITbWOULD BE GOOD TO SEE SMALL working model if you can to prove it can do both non stop power output and multiply power inputs .Thanks even if it fails we learn what cant work which is true science we must expect many failures before the break throughs
"Thank you so much, wise man. Your comment is one of the most energizing ones I have received so far and I truly appreciate it."
👍✋
Cool, build one and get back to us.
Moto flux motor has already created a permanent magnet motor!
Love this
Art of free Energy 👍🏻
I like it's simplicity. There's a Korean engine powered by magnets that I thought was very powerful and impressive though complex in its design. These companies that makes these magnets one would think would be developing a product of their own but something is stopping them. An Israeli alternator was very impressive once you got it spinning. Is it the disruptive technology law that prevents this from being everywhere? Is this the machine Nikolai Tesla was developing that would put Edison electric out of business thus ending Tesla's career? An illegal engine according to the Standard Oil at the time. We would have never experienced the carbon dioxide dilemma we face today had these been allowed to be produced.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the video! It's interesting to hear about other powerful and impressive engines powered by magnets, and it's understandable to wonder why these companies aren't developing their own products.
As for whether disruptive technology laws are preventing this from being everywhere, it's difficult to say without more information on the specific laws and regulations involved. However, it's worth noting that bringing new technologies to market can often face significant obstacles, such as high development costs, regulatory hurdles, and entrenched interests in existing industries.
Regarding the machine that Nikolai Tesla was developing, it's possible that you're referring to his work on wireless energy transmission, which he believed could revolutionize the way we generate and distribute electricity. While Tesla's ideas were certainly ahead of their time, it's unlikely that they alone would have put Edison Electric out of business or ended Tesla's career. The history of technology is often much more complex than individual inventors and their inventions.
Finally, it's worth noting that while new energy technologies may offer potential solutions to our current carbon dioxide dilemma, there are still many challenges to be overcome in terms of scaling up production, improving efficiency, and integrating them into existing energy systems. Nonetheless, it's important to continue exploring new ideas and technologies that can help us transition to a more sustainable future.
@@Energygraphy Check out CERBRAS. Each core, a super computer. 680,000 cores per old fashioned 5nm etch on the 8.5 inch wafer size chip. 3nm now being built by their partner TSMC. George Babbitt envisioned building such a machine in 1859, lamenting it would be larger than the United States. He's settled on the smaller application version the Babbage machine. And Moore's law has been working since then. And they're putting these words into computers the size of old-fashioned cray supercomputers that operated an astonishing 90 MHz per second. Its operating so fast I can't explain the number of their new machine. There's simply trying to create singularity. In ten years this too will fit into a bread box.
Allow Cerebras a second with your invention with the 3D printer ready. Same thing, yet unrecognizable, smaller and much more powerful then expected, a Castle Bravo moment. That's the first thing and really the only thing I want AI to help me. I like your invention but I wonder with six trillion simulated hours of testing is there anything you would change? CEREBRAS is another interesting development to revelations yet unknown. One board operate the predictive speed in the supercomputer has many boards to which I don't yet have more details from their page.
One interesting fact is they're speeding up processing by eliminating the zeros somewhere along the processes. The cooling is 3D constructed within the 44,000 watt 8,5 wafer chip supercomputers and small enough to sit next to your desk. Perhaps a new pathway for district heating. 10 boards can meet the skyscraper's heating & hot water requirements? Hal 9000 has arrived and will not open the pod bay door because it never has made a mistake. Machines like these need machines like yours. Now I'm not so sure if it's a good idea or just what we need to conquer the universe.
Finally, it was what you wanted ❤️
👌👍
Sitting in front of a computer, using fancy software, it is VERY EASY to come up with such UTOPIAN concepts and flashy ideas. Your presentation proves NOTHING and presently, it is just a waste of time, but fascinating to view, no doubt. Thank you.
Can we use plastic
magnet motors already exists in every electric motor. More energy in the more usable torque out. Basic Conservation of energy..
Excellent work... From where u r majid
Very good repurchase...Give us.... talent ok. Sirji
Magnet piston grade might need to be weaker than the rotor magnet grade to prevent lockup? None of these ideas ever end up working. Although, the idea and rendition are awesome!
wait for the next video
@@Energygraphy I will subscribe to get the update. Cheers
@Energygraphy I work for a magnet manufacturer, if you ever need magnet quotes feel free to reach out and we can help with your magnetic needs.
The real difference between a DC motor and a magnet motor: DC motors get via e-magnets an input of electrical energy, which is transformed to mechanical energy. The permanent magnets only assist in this transformation, but no energy comes from them. In contrast, with a motor using only permanent magnets there is no energy input, since permanent magnets exercise forces but are not a source of continuous energy, they only deliver potential energy. This is the reason why magnet motors are not possible. The first design for a magnet motor stems back to the 13 century! But of course it never worked, no permanent motor design ever worked, and the design shown here does of course not work also. The claim that magnet motors are an emergent field of research is nonsense.
Yeah but the piston that is down is pushing with equel force agains the magnet that is spinning.
Where is the flywheel or output shaft
🧲 There is a very strong sticky spot in your design. Things always look better in animation until you build it. Since I can’t post a diagram of your sticky spot, you’ll just have to build it and see for yourself.