Evnroll Zero Putters: Better Than L.A.B Putter?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- The Evnroll Zero putters are designed with Face Forward technology that balances them like a L.A.B putter, with the toe up. Evnroll says the Zero putters keep the face square to your stroke path more effectively, so you can get putts rolling down your intended line more often. So, are Evnroll Zero putters better than L.A.B putters. In this video I go into that debate and try to help you decide.
Great video as always. I have been playing with the DF3 for about 4 months. Historically a pretty good putter (Scotty Newport 2.5 ), there was a learning curve of about 2 weeks. I make significantly more putts from longer distances than before. inside 6 feet, near impossible to miss. So, know I watch the video and will acquire the Z5s. I'll text back after I've run it through the gamut. Btw, I did buy the PXG Allan. Didn't care for it at all. Only reason fior the potential change, despite. the results, it is still a bit bizarre shape wise, although better than the DF2.
Hey DAVID! Really love the way you are covering the Torque revolution. Let me know if you would ever like to discuss the finer points. I know these folks are advertising the technology as being competitive with our but I would love to chat with you sometime about the differences since so many people are going to start getting into it now.
Sam, I learned a lot from our chat at Riviera last February, so I’ll be sure to look for you on your again soon - DD
I am so glad there is so many options available now! LAB is awesome for starting this, but I am worried about the look and the forward press built in!
Nice Video! Evnroll make excellent products. You made a great point about the ball feel off the face. Its one of the best.
Will one go into your bag though David?
Do you remember when we said $300 putters were crazy expensive? Now we are up to $450 & $500 putters! They are out of their minds! I know there are R & D costs, but if they make the price more reasonable, the costs will be recouped in volume.
Another issue I have is that there is no way to test a putter in a short session on artificial turf. Only real-world testing out on the course in different situations will determine if the putter is a keeper or not. Manufacturers have got to come up with a program to allow true testing. Why not offer a rental situation and if you buy the putter, the rental fees are deducted from the price.
I don't disagree with anything you wrote. Prices are high, which is why I think it's critical to get custom fit so you know the club matches your stroke. That said, working with local shops and small golf specialty stores might give you a chance to roll putts on grass and get a better feel for a putter. Talk to a store owner, ask what you can do, put down a deposit or something so the shop knows you won't walk away with the club. Fingers crossed that you find a solution. - DD
Smart move by EVNROLL. Several years ago i had an ER2 with a 285 g head. played with it for about 3 years which was an eternity for me. The issue i had was it and you touched on it, center struck putts just don't roll out as far as a smooth faced putter. the tech works; off center strikes do go as far as center strikes. have to give them credit for that.
Over this past summer i was remotely fit for a DF3, 72 deg. lie angle, Counter balanced & heavier head options, 36 inches. NN head alignment marking and 17 in SS grip. awesome putter and feels very natural with my slight arcing stroke. no manipulation is needed to keep the face square at impact. Key to all of this is too put these zero putters in that tool that LAB has and see if the putter stays square through the stroke. I saw the the PXG Allen putter doesn't stay square when its stroked in that LAB tool. its close but not like the DF3
The bottom line is that golfers need to get custom fit for their putter, and too many players don't go through the process and learn what matches their stroke and their eyes. I'm fortunate to have a chance to try just about everything, but the putter that I consider me "gamer" is one I was fit for in 2003. It was an investment for me back then, and it is still paying dividends. - DD
@@DavidDusek exactly. My custom fit DF3 gives me amazing confidence when I’m putting. Yes it’s not the best looking but getting the ball in the hole is most important. Three years ago I actually got custom fit for the DF 2.1 but thing was so huge I couldn’t get used to it. I wound up selling it.
Cool. Did you also make waffles with that DF3?
@@giomusah2155 no pancakes.
This is not a popular warning I give now with all the hype, but do not fall for all the marketing BS: I love LAB as a company. Innovative and sympathetic. I've bought and played Mezz Max and Link 1 for both 1 season. It does not do what is advertised. If you like m, feel looks, etc, go ahead, but distance control and feel is (much) less and it takes out the intuative feel part of putting trusting only adress and line and straight take stroke. Link is better than the Max in that regard.
Made less shsorter puts, made more 3 puts on longer puts. Went back to Rossie and all better now. Why? Dunno. But I'm out of $1200 with nothing to show for it.
Does the new product line of face forward come with center shafted choices? Thanks.
Add the PXG Allan putter to the mix and we’ve got a major showdown building.
Edel does a similar thing with the 'torque balanced' EAS putters?
Right, this putter and the Edel and the L.A.B and the PXG Allan .... they are all designed to reduce or eliminate torque so the face stays square to your path more effectively. A lot of golfers could benefit from this, and honestly ... there were toe-up and zero-torque putters years ago. Odyssey made a nice one, but golfers are more open-minded these days and more willing to try non-traditional putters. - DD