Oh I’m willing to bet there will be consequences. Not criminally, but career wise. Her dumb ass actions will be reported on high & low & she will be the laughing stock of the world of journalism. Guarantee she’ll regret that decision.
If that paper does NOT relieve that reporter of “legal reporting” for that community, I think the judge should preclude that newspaper from having their reporters attend trials ! They know better and then some !
@@utoobjunkie4902 Absolutely correct We could have a mistrial on our hands. zzzzch...can you imagine the world having to sit through all of that testimony again. The Prosecution witnesses could hardly remember the facts after 4 years of waiting for this trial.
Exactly why the reporter needs serious repercussion. lose her job, be banned from his courtroom, and maybe a day in jail! i dont think they realize the severity of what could happen
@@jennifers.3818 I totally agreed with you but I just didn't have time to write to you until now. It's an absolute disgrace that something like this would ever happen. The fact that it was a journalist from The Atlanta Journal Constitution was even more shocking. I was born and raised in Marietta and live very close to the AJC. I can remember the paper would be delivered every day and everyone got it because it was such a well respected paper. Now it's as if the journalist have zero respect for the Rule of Law. She even admitted that she knew she wasn't supposed to speak or have contact with the jurors and yet she still did it. What does that say about her character? The judge was too easy on that reporter and I think you are spot on when you said she should be BANNED from ALL court rooms and to spend a day or two in jail for contempt. You wouldn't believe all of my elderly neighbors that called the AJC complaining about this reporter and wanting her fired. I will try to find out if they did end up firing her and write you back. Just wanted to thank you for writing your comment and let you know that I fully agree with you.
@@nlcrme absolutely! Add the fact that since she didn't receive any repercussions from the judge then its almost gives others the idea that nothing will happen to them either! thats why we have punishment, to deter others from doing the same thing! This judge seemed to easy on everyone in the court. Not sequestering the jury from beginning, at least during deliberation, not removing their cell phones and laptop, not removing the sleeping juror, and not admonishing the reporter! Glad that it worked out the way it did though! Justice prevailed!
She acts like she didn’t ask the juror a question and then tries to imply the juror just gave up information freely so she walked away... and has a unapologetic snooty attitude
Being from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution this does not surprise me. This leftist rag will crawl with the slugs on their belly to get a scoop or slander anyone for headlines.
Thanks alot miss alexis stevens! I'm praying you haven't wrecked the work that's been done in the past month or more or worse delay justice for this sweet innocent baby and her sister!!
Jailing someone for asking a question violates freedom of speech. It was not right of the person to ask but it's not Criminal. Good job to the jury person we're not falling for this stunt though
@@kylekyle1805 Contempt of court, for continually speaking out of term isn't a violation of constitutionally protected freedom of speech, neither is cursing in court. It's not always cut and dry with the freedom of speech, it really means that you can't be persecuted for the substance of your speech or opinions, and not just talking whenever you feel like. It's illegal to tell someone that you're going to kill them, there's just so many examples, it's complicated I guess.
This is what happens when a jury is not sequestered......js....I also believe reporter should have been A)arrested for contempt and/or jury tampering B) made to leave courtroom. Barred. And C) she seriously needs to lose her job.
@@mscelbabe1 maybe. But it's also jury tampering in my opinion. If this had caused a mistrial the families, witnesses, every one would have to go through all of this again! The tax payers of that county would have to pay for another trial. Just because one ADULT tried to do something she KNEW she shouldn't........
Well regardless of what happens legally, this reporter will be publicly shamed & her career will absolutely be effected. This will be reported on high & low. Incredible behavior from this woman.
The Woman in the Light Blue Dress obviously lied when she said what happened. It's beyond implausible to believe she approached the juror, asked how it was going, and he told all.
If a mistrial was granted, the judge should get the reporter and the newspaper she works for to pay for the trial...attorney fees and all! THAT would send a message!!
The judge handed the situation professionally. The defense doesn’t look happy she couldn’t get a mistrial. She was quick to bring it up. She knows how badly this will end for her clients. The reporter Alexis Stevens should have been banned from the courtroom immediately. I wonder if she will have a job tomorrow at the newspaper. That’s so wrong! If it was declared a mistrial she should be responsible for all the costs of the retrial! What an idiot!
Most judges would rant and rave at the reporter. This judge leaves such a powerful message of authority by remaining calm and not even discussing punishment. They don’t make judges like this anymore.
In the UK, once a person has been charged with a criminal matter, it is then classed as 'sub judice' and reporting on it is prohibited under penalty of imprisonment. This is to prevent trial by media. So for me, as a British subject, this is rather strange.
I am surprised there was no penalty for the reporter. She had to know that it was improper to communicate with a juror. The number of retrials if all reporters did this would be horrendous.
The reporters tone of voice when responding to the Judge was so incredibly disrespectful. His facial expression and long pause really conveyed his opinion of her. She sounded like an entitled stroppy teenager. She ought to be banned from the courtroom and have her employers warned about their reporters behaviour. It’s a massive thing to risk causing a mistrial. The time, cost, and effort wasted would be huge.
Celeste Corrigan, after seeing the final resolution I’m less concerned about grounds for appeal, but I certainly wouldn’t put it past them to try. I don’t wish bad on the reporter, but I think she might be better suited for a different job, or at the very least a different area of reporting.😏
fran mellor, can you imagine if the judge was forced to declare a mistrial?! The actions of one out of control reporter could’ve forced a 7 year old survivor of horrific abuse to face her abusers again! Unbelievably stupid!😠
Unfortunately you guys, Alexis Stevens is still employed. AJC’s reporter almost caused a mistrial and shes still on staff. That paper is egregious and without merit.
peachypj3 Well, all of this just happened today didn’t it? I’m not saying she will lose her job but the paper has hardly had time to deal w/this behavior from the reporter.
The thing to do is boycott the news outlet. In 1989 there was a soccer match in England where a serious crushing incident occurred and 96 Liverpool spectators died. About three days later a publication called the Sun ran a front page story claiming Liverpool supporters were robbing the dead (for which there was no evidence). The people of Liverpool have boycotted that rag to this day.
Unbelievable, she hasn't been kicked out from the courtroom. I've got more trouble at school, in 6th grade while got cought copying a quiz test from a friend. Now, I don't know what kind of crime he's allegedly got accused of, but a week of trial, news etc etc, there is the freedom of a human being at stake here. Wtf is that for real or a reality TV show? Mistrial Big time. He's gonna walk, I guess. I don't know if it's me but it seems all a big joke. The judge even laughed at one point when sending the jurors on a 15 nibs recess. Very odd... Not even on Colombo a thing like this would happens..
Thank goodness the juror didn’t say anything of substance to the reporter. Shame on the reporter for speaking to the juror!! Joseph appears to be in deep thought. He sees the writing on the wall.
The judge - sheriff’s dept shouldn’t have allowed the jury and press to be in the same place but the reason the judge told the jury not to talk to the press is some of the press may try to talk to them. She asked if they were almost done not said if you don’t find him not guilty things could get uncomfortable for you
Picking my jaw up off the floor. Aside from all the legal issues, the journalist should be fired for asking the stupidest possible question of a juror, an unanswerable question in every way, "How far along are you?" That's not a journalist question even if they were already deliberating which apparently they weren't. Stupidest question ever.
I hope she does. It's taken 4 years to get this far and her silly action could have cost a mis-trial. Millie would have to re-testify and go through the whole thing again, she doesn't deserve that. Her sister Laila deserves justice.
She won't, they are covering for her. They claim the juror is not telling the truth and she just said how's it going? I wonder who is more hated right now, Jenn or the dumbass reporter wannabe?
ifellicantgetup It’s a close call! Everyone seems pretty united in their feelings regarding Jennifer. BUT, I guarantee this female reporters dumb ass actions have significantly affected her career. This will be reported on, high & low. She’ll be ridiculed & publicly shamed. Rightly so.
No Body yes I thought that I think they must have her as guilty and now seeing how culpable he was. Party to a crime. I think meaning they think a crime was committed by Jennifer
I’ve always thought the most difficult part of the jury’s decisions would be about Jospeh, not Jennifer. My concern has been-are they able to convict Jennifer or whatever counts they agree on, if they are unable to agree about those counts regarding Joseph? I’ve been worried if they couldn’t reach a consensus regarding Jospeh, it might mean a mistrial for both. Is that wrong, I hope?
Destiny Myers I think it maybe hung on Joseph or a not guilty on some counts due to them not understanding the charges. Ie having knowledge means ur culpable which I don’t think the jury understand and he doesn’t have to be there to commit the crime, treating the bruises is enough to convict him of allowing that crime to happen. Understand it’s hard for the jury but surely they understand with what they had explained to them as to why he is charged as well.
Is this the Clint Eastwood movie called Richard Jewell? Atlanta journal framed that nice security guard for the Atlanta Olympics bombing in Centennial Park?
the reporters assertion doesn't make sense, she said that she asked the juror a question about the case, why would the reporter walk away as the juror began to respond to her question?why Would any reporter, getting an answer to their question, walk away before they get the answer? they wouldn't!
Wow Alexis Stevens, you sure had a snippy response when called out for talking to a juror even when you were warned not to. “He didn’t say he couldn’t talk, he actually did start talking”. He said “he didn’t know”, but sure misconstrue the statement all you want like a true journalist and try to get him in trouble. How did that work out for you? 😂
@@Shez-dc3fn she admitted herself that he didn’t talk about the case. The “he did start talking” was referring to pleasantries they exchanged. She just didn’t like that she got called out in front of the court for breaking a rule she knew was wrong. She knew not to talk to any juror and did it anyway.
Has anyone been attending this trial? I am curious about Jennifer and Joseph's behaviour during breaks and lunch, along with the dynamics between Tessa and Jennifer. I wonder if they cross paths as they enter or exit court? I can't imagine what it would be like and how much self-restraint it would take to be in such close proximity to someone accused of murdering my child,
Mistrials are tough to get, even when there is a good cause for a mistrial. Depending on the situation, the remedy is a retrial, ordinarily not dismissal.
That reporter was trying to make a name for herself to further her career, hopefully it's had the opposite effect. This is a very difficult and harrowing case for everyone involved (minus the animals) the Last thing anyone needs is the mistrial that the defence jumped on
The close-up of the defendant after the judge's ruling against a mistrial at 6:25 is telling. For the next 30 seconds, it shows a man reliving everything he did to an innocent child and realizing he is going to go to prison with the big boys for the rest of his life, probably contemplating suicide.
That reporter should have been banned from the courtroom. She didn’t even sound sorry
Exactly why is the reporter getting away with this....
Oh I’m willing to bet there will be consequences. Not criminally, but career wise. Her dumb ass actions will be reported on high & low & she will be the laughing stock of the world of journalism. Guarantee she’ll regret that decision.
Reporter seemed rather proud of herself. I expected her to add...yeah, so WHAT?
Reporters are full of s#!t. They lie on TV day in and day out. They dont care about rules.
She most definitely should have been held in contempt. She absolutely knew what she was doing was illegal, yet did it anyway.
That face the judge made that was a "hold on I'm trying to find Jesus before I talk to you"
Lmao!!! Trying to find Jesus so he doesn’t kill the reporter.
😂😂😂👏👏
@@crossfitnerd1085 facts 🤣
Lol!
Haha I thought the same thing! "Lord give me strength."
Moment judge knows she just lied for newspaper headline. Wish he placed her under oath before asking questions.
If anyone is looking for a job I think the Atlanta Journal Constitution has an opening for a reporter
Reporting live from my sofa lol
If that paper does NOT relieve that reporter of “legal reporting” for that community, I think the judge should preclude that newspaper from having their reporters attend trials ! They know better and then some !
@@utoobjunkie4902 Absolutely correct We could have a mistrial on our hands. zzzzch...can you imagine the world having to sit through all of that testimony again. The Prosecution witnesses could hardly remember the facts after 4 years of waiting for this trial.
Lol. I love your remark. Too funny!!!!!
The Judge should fine these reporters. They take advantage!!! Fine and or jail time plus lose her job!!!!!!
Such a contemplative, thoughtful, and wise judge. His temperament is admirable.
I think we can say, with absolute certainty, that the judge is absolutely furious !!
Can you imagine this whole thing going out the window because of a reporter pulling some next level mess like this
Exactly why the reporter needs serious repercussion. lose her job, be banned from his courtroom, and maybe a day in jail! i dont think they realize the severity of what could happen
@@jennifers.3818 I totally agreed with you but I just didn't have time to write to you until now.
It's an absolute disgrace that something like this would ever happen.
The fact that it was a journalist from The Atlanta Journal Constitution was even more shocking. I was born and raised in Marietta and live very close to the AJC. I can remember the paper would be delivered every day and everyone got it because it was such a well respected paper. Now it's as if the journalist have zero respect for the Rule of Law. She even admitted that she knew she wasn't supposed to speak or have contact with the jurors and yet she still did it. What does that say about her character? The judge was too easy on that reporter and I think you are spot on when you said she should be BANNED from ALL court rooms and to spend a day or two in jail for contempt.
You wouldn't believe all of my elderly neighbors that called the AJC complaining about this reporter and wanting her fired. I will try to find out if they did end up firing her and write you back.
Just wanted to thank you for writing your comment and let you know that I fully agree with you.
@@nlcrme absolutely! Add the fact that since she didn't receive any repercussions from the judge then its almost gives others the idea that nothing will happen to them either! thats why we have punishment, to deter others from doing the same thing! This judge seemed to easy on everyone in the court. Not sequestering the jury from beginning, at least during deliberation, not removing their cell phones and laptop, not removing the sleeping juror, and not admonishing the reporter! Glad that it worked out the way it did though! Justice prevailed!
That pause at 2:50 until 3:30. Love it! I wonder if the judge was trying to control himself from screaming.
The way he glared at her!
He’s obviously just trying to plan his response extremely carefully to avoid a mistrial risk. Not everything is melodramatic
She acts like she didn’t ask the juror a question and then tries to imply the juror just gave up information freely so she walked away... and has a unapologetic snooty attitude
When the judge took off his glasses...😳😳😳 How dumb do you have to be to approach a juror DURING deliberations?!?!?!🤯
Maltzu Mom I know ya! I thought the same plus a few expletives! 😡
Maltzu Mom sounds like he is going to go down as well!!
Being from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution this does not surprise me. This leftist rag will crawl with the slugs on their belly to get a scoop or slander anyone for headlines.
@@gunsknives5395 sew
@@shirleychacon1692 Says it all for your character.
2:45 the look of a man who is trying to keep his head from literally exploding.
thank you!! I love this kind of comment! S2. Let it be known that you present us readers of comments with essential and quality service.
Yes! I even replayed it a couple times, that was elite level self control! 🤯🤬
Thanks alot miss alexis stevens! I'm praying you haven't wrecked the work that's been done in the past month or more or worse delay justice for this sweet innocent baby and her sister!!
I love this judge. His face says it all.
Ha there is a lot in his face :p
@@AdamBechtol Mumbles !
The Reporter needs a few days in jail.
Yes why is she not????
100%!!!
Jailing someone for asking a question violates freedom of speech. It was not right of the person to ask but it's not Criminal. Good job to the jury person we're not falling for this stunt though
@@kylekyle1805 Contempt of court, for continually speaking out of term isn't a violation of constitutionally protected freedom of speech, neither is cursing in court. It's not always cut and dry with the freedom of speech, it really means that you can't be persecuted for the substance of your speech or opinions, and not just talking whenever you feel like. It's illegal to tell someone that you're going to kill them, there's just so many examples, it's complicated I guess.
And her boss at the newspaper office!
I don't believe she did this on her own!
This is what happens when a jury is not sequestered......js....I also believe reporter should have been A)arrested for contempt and/or jury tampering B) made to leave courtroom. Barred. And C) she seriously needs to lose her job.
@Taharkah X I was SOOOO hoping he'd throw her in jail!!! 😡😡😡😡😡
K G that's a bit punitive!
@@mscelbabe1 maybe. But it's also jury tampering in my opinion. If this had caused a mistrial the families, witnesses, every one would have to go through all of this again! The tax payers of that county would have to pay for another trial. Just because one ADULT tried to do something she KNEW she shouldn't........
Well regardless of what happens legally, this reporter will be publicly shamed & her career will absolutely be effected. This will be reported on high & low. Incredible behavior from this woman.
@@GrannyJB absolutely correct
The Woman in the Light Blue Dress obviously lied when she said what happened.
It's beyond implausible to believe she approached the juror, asked how it was going, and he told all.
I think she lied too. He dropped her in it and she didn't like it.
If a mistrial was granted, the judge should get the reporter and the newspaper she works for to pay for the trial...attorney fees and all! THAT would send a message!!
Deliberate! Nice try for a mistrial, perfect grounds for appeal. Wonder which friend set that up?
the defense side
I agree
there is no grounds for appeal!!
it was a journalist...
my point was neither side set it up.
The judge handed the situation professionally. The defense doesn’t look happy she couldn’t get a mistrial. She was quick to bring it up. She knows how badly this will end for her clients.
The reporter Alexis Stevens should have been banned from the courtroom immediately. I wonder if she will have a job tomorrow at the newspaper. That’s so wrong! If it was declared a mistrial she should be responsible for all the costs of the retrial! What an idiot!
Most judges would rant and rave at the reporter. This judge leaves such a powerful message of authority by remaining calm and not even discussing punishment. They don’t make judges like this anymore.
The removal of his glasses showed he meant business
The definition of level headed
when the judge takes off his glasses and folds them.. you know you are in for it
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"This person has been described as wearing a diabetus patch."
[Wilford Brimley: Eyes rapidly shift side-to-side, quietly slips out of the room.]
2:50 - 3:29 When you want to go nuclear but trying hard not to.
The judge uses his silence as a sledge hammer. You know the suspense didn’t feel nice at all
In the UK, once a person has been charged with a criminal matter, it is then classed as 'sub judice' and reporting on it is prohibited under penalty of imprisonment. This is to prevent trial by media. So for me, as a British subject, this is rather strange.
Yank here. That’s one y’all have got going for ya 🤙
Wow .... just what I was thinking before Defence mentioned mistrial. I wondered if it was a set up for a mistrial. Thank God it was denied.
I am surprised there was no penalty for the reporter. She had to know that it was improper to communicate with a juror. The number of retrials if all reporters did this would be horrendous.
1st Amendment.
@@gawainethefirst The first amendment does not allow you to tamper with jurors, you can receive serious jail time for this kinda stuff.
The reporters tone of voice when responding to the Judge was so incredibly disrespectful. His facial expression and long pause really conveyed his opinion of her. She sounded like an entitled stroppy teenager. She ought to be banned from the courtroom and have her employers warned about their reporters behaviour. It’s a massive thing to risk causing a mistrial. The time, cost, and effort wasted would be huge.
Congratulations Ms.Stevens! You just gave the Rosenbaum’s grounds for appeal! So incredibly arrogant and inconsiderate!😏🙄😒
Worse than that contemptable..lock her up for interfering with the jury
Maltzu Mom I don't think there are grounds for appeal! Nothing was divulged
Celeste Corrigan, after seeing the final resolution I’m less concerned about grounds for appeal, but I certainly wouldn’t put it past them to try. I don’t wish bad on the reporter, but I think she might be better suited for a different job, or at the very least a different area of reporting.😏
fran mellor, can you imagine if the judge was forced to declare a mistrial?! The actions of one out of control reporter could’ve forced a 7 year old survivor of horrific abuse to face her abusers again! Unbelievably stupid!😠
Maltzu Mom I’m soooooo mad!!!
Don't grant a mistrial Judge! The defense has a certain reporter on the payroll!
Nah she just tryin to get the big scoop 😂😂💯
I like this judge.
3:02 - This *IS NOT* the look you wan't to see on ANY judges face after you answer his question.
Alan Alda is killing it as a judge
Unfortunately you guys, Alexis Stevens is still employed. AJC’s reporter almost caused a mistrial and shes still on staff. That paper is egregious and without merit.
peachypj3 Well, all of this just happened today didn’t it? I’m not saying she will lose her job but the paper has hardly had time to deal w/this behavior from the reporter.
The thing to do is boycott the news outlet. In 1989 there was a soccer match in England where a serious crushing incident occurred and 96 Liverpool spectators died. About three days later a publication called the Sun ran a front page story claiming Liverpool supporters were robbing the dead (for which there was no evidence). The people of Liverpool have boycotted that rag to this day.
@@geoffpoole483 not only the people of Liverpool, they lost a lot of readers who to this day wouldn’t buy that paper if it was the only one in UK 😡
Excellent judge.
Reporter SHOULD know the rules. 'No juror contact' means NO juror contact.....PERIOD. She didn't even offer an apology to the court.
She and the agency she represents should be banned from attending the trial.
Unbelievable, she hasn't been kicked out from the courtroom. I've got more trouble at school, in 6th grade while got cought copying a quiz test from a friend. Now, I don't know what kind of crime he's allegedly got accused of, but a week of trial, news etc etc, there is the freedom of a human being at stake here. Wtf is that for real or a reality TV show? Mistrial Big time. He's gonna walk, I guess. I don't know if it's me but it seems all a big joke. The judge even laughed at one point when sending the jurors on a 15 nibs recess. Very odd... Not even on Colombo a thing like this would happens..
At a MINIMUM, there should be a contempt charge... this "journalist" knows better. Not cool for her to put the juror in this position with the Judge.
For the love of god mull sit down...nooo you can't have a mistrial
if she didnt ask f9r one she would have been neglecting her duty to hrr client.
@Frank Lincoln absolutely.
@@KristoffRand indeed.
What if... it was a set up by someone sypathetic to the defence? Just asking...
Good point
Karen I also think that, to get a mis-trial. Just glad it didn't work.
Don't worry you really are not alone in that, people noticed their body language when mistrial was denied..
My thoughts exactly!!!
VERY WELL couldve been!! WHY the judge didnt punish this reporter?!!
I know the prosecution was sweating bullets...I am so happy the judge is level headed....I know them baby killers were thinking yes its over...
Can the reporter be held in contempt or anything for this ?
uhoh! someone is in trouble!! Judge is PISSED OFFFF!! WHAT TF IS WRONG WITH YOU?!!
I don't understand why Judge didn't punish that reporter. She was proud of herself.
Coz defense had set it up so they could get a mistrial.
@@jacryan2004 Oooohhhhooo!!
@@jacryan2004did you see that Michael's brother is now in trouble. Hope we get to see his court case.
I love the judges face! He's like "WTF is happening in this world??? Effing journalists!"
Thank goodness the juror didn’t say anything of substance to the reporter. Shame on the reporter for speaking to the juror!!
Joseph appears to be in deep thought. He sees the writing on the wall.
She should have been banned from the courtroom from that point on
😮 Say ? 😮 ⚖️ Thank you Your Honour. We can’t put a 6yr old child back on the stand. We can’t Your Honour. ⚖️
Dealing with the great unwashed is harder than I thought. Kudos to the judge.
The nerve of her, hold her in contempt!
If they paid the clown who fell off the stand $7500, I wonder what they paid that AJC reporter?? She should be fired!
She should be put in jail till the trials done.
This judge is GORGEOUS!!!
You can hear everyone make a sigh of relief when the judge said mistrial denied!
As usual the press and media overstep their bounds she should have her credentials removed and fired she's a pathetic discrace
The judge - sheriff’s dept shouldn’t have allowed the jury and press to be in the same place but the reason the judge told the jury not to talk to the press is some of the press may try to talk to them.
She asked if they were almost done not said if you don’t find him not guilty things could get uncomfortable for you
Defense wants a mistrial so badly...she knows her clients are quilty
I think it’s called guilty
thats despicable... interfering with the solem duty of a jury....
Mull you look for anything to save you clients from the verdict of GUILTY.....
If a defense attorney does not vigorously defend their clients they can be disbarred. I think she is doing a pretty good job considering the odds.
Yeah that's a defense attorney's job.
They pause and dumbfounded look he gave was amazing lol
Millie says that Joseph was in the room when she & Leyla were being belted etc. This makes him an accessory doesn’t it?
He glared at that lady throughout this whole thing.
Wish the reporter would have said " I dont answer questions ". 😅🤣
Everyone knows to NEVER approach a Juror when a trial is in order...
Makes me wonder if it was planned so they could declare a mistrial??
Judge takes off his glasses ... you know you’re in trouble
Picking my jaw up off the floor. Aside from all the legal issues, the journalist should be fired for asking the stupidest possible question of a juror, an unanswerable question in every way, "How far along are you?" That's not a journalist question even if they were already deliberating which apparently they weren't. Stupidest question ever.
So she doesn't approach any other time but the moment they are signing guilty!!! ?? Gez MULL AND JR HAVE NO SHAME
Right! I immediately said nice try Mull, not today! NOT TODAY
The jury note is pretty telling..they are trying to figure out if they can pin anything on Joseph because he wasn’t allegedly there for the abuse
Wow! This had to be intentional. Who would want to jeopardize the the trial of a murdered 2 year old?
a nosey news reporter who probably wanted the scoop of its about to end ie. verdicts due or w/e it could also be intentional, who knows
Damn, she's works for the biggest paper in Atlanta, she better pray she doesn't get suspended
Rainey J course she won't
I hope she does. It's taken 4 years to get this far and her silly action could have cost a mis-trial. Millie would have to re-testify and go through the whole thing again, she doesn't deserve that. Her sister Laila deserves justice.
She won't, they are covering for her. They claim the juror is not telling the truth and she just said how's it going?
I wonder who is more hated right now, Jenn or the dumbass reporter wannabe?
ifellicantgetup It’s a close call! Everyone seems pretty united in their feelings regarding Jennifer. BUT, I guarantee this female reporters dumb ass actions have significantly affected her career. This will be reported on, high & low. She’ll be ridiculed & publicly shamed. Rightly so.
@@nikkie1724 so true! People don't think about the consequences and her boss def had told her "wtf, were u thinking"
Well they are in trouble!!! Wooow
Judge looks pissed off
He looked like he was going to go absolutely berserk.
Really Pissed
As he should be
@@geoffpoole483 yessss
Had visions of the judge with his hands on his head shouting “NOOOOO”
The judge was counting to 10 but it wasn’t enough so he kept on counting and until he could talk without slapping her in the face
The question the jury asked is based on Joseph knowledge of Jennifer abuse... it’s looking bad for Jennifer in which it should be.
No Body yes I thought that I think they must have her as guilty and now seeing how culpable he was. Party to a crime. I think meaning they think a crime was committed by Jennifer
Layla’s Positivity Palace right, exactly
I’ve always thought the most difficult part of the jury’s decisions would be about Jospeh, not Jennifer. My concern has been-are they able to convict Jennifer or whatever counts they agree on, if they are unable to agree about those counts regarding Joseph? I’ve been worried if they couldn’t reach a consensus regarding Jospeh, it might mean a mistrial for both. Is that wrong, I hope?
Destiny Myers I think it maybe hung on Joseph or a not guilty on some counts due to them not understanding the charges. Ie having knowledge means ur culpable which I don’t think the jury understand and he doesn’t have to be there to commit the crime, treating the bruises is enough to convict him of allowing that crime to happen. Understand it’s hard for the jury but surely they understand with what they had explained to them as to why he is charged as well.
So u guys think they can convict her even if they are hung on Joseph?
Is this the Clint Eastwood movie called Richard Jewell? Atlanta journal framed that nice security guard for the Atlanta Olympics bombing in Centennial Park?
What was the reporter thinking?
beth adkins she is a narcissistic
beth adkins I concur!!
She wasn’t thinking
Wow wow wow wow. Unbelievable!
That slimy news media person has no shame. Disgusting behavior.
the reporters assertion doesn't make sense, she said that she asked the juror a question about the case, why would the reporter walk away as the juror began to respond to her question?why Would any reporter, getting an answer to their question, walk away before they get the answer? they wouldn't!
Why wasn't the reporter charged with jury tampering
Wow Alexis Stevens, you sure had a snippy response when called out for talking to a juror even when you were warned not to. “He didn’t say he couldn’t talk, he actually did start talking”. He said “he didn’t know”, but sure misconstrue the statement all you want like a true journalist and try to get him in trouble. How did that work out for you? 😂
you ony have her word against him. if he did start talking he isnt going to admit that he did talk due to legal consequences
@@Shez-dc3fn she admitted herself that he didn’t talk about the case. The “he did start talking” was referring to pleasantries they exchanged. She just didn’t like that she got called out in front of the court for breaking a rule she knew was wrong. She knew not to talk to any juror and did it anyway.
@@Shez-dc3fn if he did talk to her, why would he report on himself? I wouldn't believe a single thing that reporter says. She obviously has no ethics.
Hair on fire, this is awesome
New job opening people 😉
So many questions!! Is that Reporter a friend of the BUMS?? or Mull??
Somebody give this judge a medal.
Has anyone been attending this trial? I am curious about Jennifer and Joseph's behaviour during breaks and lunch, along with the dynamics between Tessa and Jennifer. I wonder if they cross paths as they enter or exit court? I can't imagine what it would be like and how much self-restraint it would take to be in such close proximity to someone accused of murdering my child,
Mistrials are tough to get, even when there is a good cause for a mistrial. Depending on the situation, the remedy is a retrial, ordinarily not dismissal.
The way the judged paused after asking
should've been held in contempt
The press should know not to talk to a juror! She must be newer but still needs to lose her job and be held in contempt!
i have that exact microphone. got it with an Asus motherboard probably 13/14 years ago
Why was the jury not sequestered so as to prevent tampering?
The other person who needs to lose their job is the Law & Crime Trial Network sound guy....
6:18 anyone else notice how tall the lady in the yellow dress is?
Why are some court rooms so bloody noisy???
That reporter was trying to make a name for herself to further her career, hopefully it's had the opposite effect. This is a very difficult and harrowing case for everyone involved (minus the animals) the Last thing anyone needs is the mistrial that the defence jumped on
That's why Juries are brought lunch 🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️...
The close-up of the defendant after the judge's ruling against a mistrial at 6:25 is telling. For the next 30 seconds, it shows a man reliving everything he did to an innocent child and realizing he is going to go to prison with the big boys for the rest of his life, probably contemplating suicide.
who was trying to talking to The police officer as in what was The news jurnalists name?
Talk about your last ditch effort by the defense! No one is that stupid. She's on the payroll!
@6:24 "Well ... THAT didn't work ... NOW what?"