We are surrounded by evidence for intelligent design, but you have to actually have a look for it to see it, which many people refuse to honestly and seriously do.
This man is a hero, and has been one for years: the future will revindicate him. The whole world has been shifting in this direction for years and as the truth is progressively revealed, so intelligent design will appear as the only scientifically possible response. There are many others of his calibre working everday towards this goal.
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.". Schopenhauer.
I teach a Christian Evidence class and Bible Classes at a small OK university and have enjoyed using your material so much. They don't keep a tight rein on me here and your material has received rave review. "is the Bible Reliable" has been a great help also. Thanks so much!
A completely rational and objective analysis of the only comprehensive theory to successfully explain all three conundrums facing science today, which include entropy of the singularity, extreme symmetry of the fundamental constants and forces, and the origin of cellular life. Magnificent!
It is really the powerful against those that have less. Two religions are clashing - evolutionism and creationism. The truth is - one of them is so full of pride it can't admit - it is a religion.
I am thankful for the Courage of men like Stephen Myers and others for their willingness not to cower to the powerful forces that oppose them. Revelation 21 states that the cowardly will have their place in the Lake of Fire.
Stephen Meyer is right because the TRUTH is right. Our Father is making sure that the TRUTH will come out. "The nations will have to know that I am the LORD". God bless your work Dr. Meyer.
The mathematical impossibilities of evolution by random mutations is something that scientists are going to have to come to grips with in the coming years. They will have to ignore basic math to cling to Darwinism.
It's amazing to watch the intricate machinery of the RNA and DNA molecule, and the molecular motors of the most primitive bacteria, and to claim they developed FIRST in the chain of life, and literally billions of years ago. It's not just intelligent design, it's way way more intelligent design,. We can't build those micro machines now.
This is just fantastic and well articulated. I am not an intelligent design proponent myself but I am very much sympathetic to the view though. I will await the follow up episodes in the serie. And yes, I have read signature in the cell when it came out and loved it for one specific reason, the link between 'mind and specified information'. I never really was able to think otherwise since then. 😇
LOL, I can tell you're a religious zealot ignorant of science. Thank you for your admission. 1) There's no such thing as darwinism, that is a word made up by those of weak faith. 2) The theory of evolution was devised 100s of years before Darwin was born. Those of science ignorance attribute it to Darwin. 3) evolution is not a belief, it is a conclusion based off of the evidence unlike religion which has ZERO evidence.
At about 5:15 in the video, Dr. Meyer asks 'Why so much controversy?' Simply put, because Revelation 12:9b ('misleading') & 1 John 5:19 are right on! Nothing Biblical is popular today, especially sexual constraints.
The fact that the opponents to intelligent design resort to rage and academic bulling tactics I take as evidence against the theory they try to protect. If the case for the theory is so good why not just state it clearly, and be honest about the reach and possible limitations of the theory? The way that intelligent design is presented in this channel I find understandable and compelling. This is unlike the impression I get from proponents of neo-darwinian evolution. There I am asked to almost take it by faith in the authority of the experts. They have knowledge not accessible to simpletons like me, and like to throw around academic jargon to strengthen that impression. Some tries to make complex subject comprehensible, others tries to make simple subjects sound incomprehensible for the people outside the select group.
When we walk with the Lord in the light of his word, what a glory he sheds on our way! While we do his good will, he abides with us still, and with all who will trust and obey. Trust and obey, for there's no other way to be happy in Jesus, but to trust and obey. 2. Not a burden we bear, not a sorrow we share, but our toil he doth richly repay; not a grief or a loss, not a frown or a cross, but is blest if we trust and obey. 3 .But we never can prove the delights of his love until all on the altar we lay; for the favor he shows, for the joy he bestows, are for them who will trust and obey. 4. Then in fellowship sweet we will sit at his feet, or we'll walk by his side in the way; what he says we will do, where he sends we will go; never fear, only trust and obey.
I've always considered the term "natural selection" to be a loaded term which holds no logical weight .. natural selection intends to infer that nature selects, for example nature selects those mutations (copy mistakes) within the genome that might be beneficial to an organism in specific environments or circumstances. A mutation in the genome that inactivates the possibility of growing short haired coats on dogs in the Arctic would then suggest natural selection "selected" the long hair coated dogs to survive. When in fact all that happened is that the genome sequence was interrupted by a copy mistake, or mutation, which took away the possibility of providing information sequences that could specify the sequencing for both short and long haired animals. Information along the genome was therefore lost and now only long haired dogs populates the environment. If there were any short haired dogs then they simply died becuse of the cold and not because nature selected anything. The ability to select is only found within concious beings with minds. Last time I checked nature was the result or product of something else and nature itself doesn't posess a mind to make concious decicions with; which would include the ability to select .. anything.
I have a very simplistic view based on observation, as a builder, even the simplest of structures require a designer/builder... Even the simplest of organisms in the natural world are far beyond the simplest of structures...
"Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out! Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor? Who has ever given to God, that God should repay them? For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory forever! Amen."
Use to not like this guy till my eyes turned on (Long time for that cuz I'm 72). I saw that intelligence & consciousness seems to be built into the universe from the quantum level up. I'm not sure I believe in religion Gods but I do feel there is a CNO (Chief 'Ngineering Officer), that could be called God if you want, for the universe. The clues are many & the execution is deep & very mysterious but none the less it looks very real. My mind is much calmer & accepting after leaving the hard atheist camp. Blessing to all (even hard atheists).
I think I know why people don't like intelligent design theory, because it leads us to a Designer . And if we, imperfect people, seeking justice, truth and reason i our lifes existence, eventually at some point, we will have to give an account to This Designer. That's why we are trying to suppress this feeling deep down in our hearts.
The characteristics that the Intelligent Designer reveals align with those of the Christian God (transcends space, time and matter - is eternal and spiritual - and is personal - because the being had to make the choice to create - seemingly of great intelligence - omniscient - seemingly omnipotent - to create time, matter, space, etc.), so that's why many end up being Christians because of it.
Please work on the sound. It is dull and bassy. Thank you for this lecture. The tide is thankfully turning towards intelligent design. We were oppressed by unlogical and unsientific evolutionistic ideas long enough. I read "Herkunft und Zukunft des Menschen" (~Origin and Future of Mankind) from A. E. Wilder-Smith in the 1990th and since then knew that Intelligent Design is more reasonable than Evolution.
Thank you ... Stephen Meyer, your work is amazing. You really have made the truth known. What men think is not as important as what the most intelligent mind thinks.
There is a principle - which is a bar against all information - which is a proof against all argument - and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is condemnation before investigation! Edmund Spenser, English Poet - 1552 -1599. The problem isn't the evidence, becuase the evidence speaks for its self. The problem is pride.
Doing a Google search on alternative theories to evolution I can notice that there is very little information provided, there is really a lot of censure.
Sternberg and Bechly fit the definition: stal·wart /ˈstôlwərt/ adjective loyal, reliable, and hardworking. "he remained a stalwart supporter of the cause"
*أَمْ خُلِقُوا مِنْ غَيْرِ شَيْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ الْخَالِقُونَ (35)* *Were they created from nothing? or are they the creators?* Surat al-tur verse 35 | Quran. Of course anything can't come out of nothing, that's by logic....or did the creation create itself Which is Also illogical, why don't we see/witness things just pope out of nothingness or did we create ourselves? I'm a genetic / biology student and saying that the complexity of the digital order of genes (Which are insanely specific and perfectly fit to create life) was just by randomness and chance is the insanity May Allah bless this honest Man.
Truth remains truth no matter what you believe and your perception of it has zero effect on it. Search for truth while you are alive because when you are dead all opportunity comes to an end. In death you will find truth but it may not be what you thought it was.
So who or what is the being who 'intelligently designed' the Universe and what was this beings motive for doing do ? This is a question known as the 'Mc Dougal conundrum' and has yet to be answered.
This is awesome! Those people lying to oppose your work are like little immature devious children having TANTRUMS out of their biases and fears instead of going after truth no-matter what the result. Their reactions are revealing. Keep on keeping on. :)
Circumstantial evidence for intelligent design far exceeds any other theories, especially Darwin’s theory. Think Michael Behe’s irreducible complexity.
Intelligent design of life is readily apparent by many microscopic scientific studies. Making the leap of explaining the intelligent design of the universe and scientific laws and theories is not easy to show difinitive scientific facts and more conjecture.
The more I examine the universe and the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense must have known we were coming. -Freeman Dyson
A statistical impossibility is defined as _“a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument."_ (*The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80.) The probability of a functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more *Rational and Reasonable* to conclude that the cell was not formed by undirected random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that undirected random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.) A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what many of the world’s top scientists _‘must’_ believe in and promote because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic subjective ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millenia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by discoveries in Quantum Physics.
Have you looked to the criteria being used n the search for intelligent extraterrestrial life movement as to what represents noise and what represents evidence of intelligence? They must have some criteria. How does the code in dna rank on those criteria?
Which one of this two requires more faith? 1. Something is designed but it doesn’t have a designer. 2. Something is designed so it have to have a designer. Like for #2 Comment for #1
There is both material and immaterial (or physical and metaphysical) existence in the cosmos. Arguments for this reality are expounded in the Creationary Synthesis - an alternative to Darwinian evolution.
In history of mainstream science where few turnarounds in believes and theories. 1. Spontaneous generation of complex life from inanimate matter 2. Flat earth 3. Geocentric model/system 4. Einstein's Static Universe Theory 5. ... 6. Therefore, Darwin theory of evolution could be one of the theories that could be added to this list. In my opinion, should be more debates with mainstream evolution scientist where these theories and facts could be presented and ask for explanation or proofs. By liking any RUclips channel or presentation will not make same impact as confronting Scientist at the same level and opening all these ideas, theories, facts and look for the answers and new theories which could better explained • Origin of Universe • Origin of life • How we start to think and speak • And many more… From the science book in school we got this kind of explanation : · And fish by the time developed legs and lungs …and inhabits lands · And by the time some living animal species developed spine… For me this is more dogma then science…Word Evolution or developed is used as magic wand or time machine. Without explanation this is only hypotheses If Evolution works, does it mean that reverse way is possible… can human become monkey by the time in the same order of facts… human go back to jungle and by the time and isolation develop body and brain as monkey
Perhaps it's just semantics but does not the term "Natural Selection" have the word "Selection" in it? Therefore does it not stand to reason that to make a selection based on how the environmental factors that are embedded into the fabric of nature necessarily require the ability to make that selection? A selection that would require a conscious intelligence of some sort? Therefore if this is logical and true then it must be that this force that allows and makes possible all the known and as of yet unknown permutations of life has to be "intelligent". To summarily brush off the idea of "Intelligent Design" by simply invoking the words "Natural Selection" in a sort of matter of factly attitude as though it explains everything without the implications of how we define it is short-sighted and typical of anally-retentive, orthodox academics.
We are surrounded by evidence for intelligent design, but you have to actually have a look for it to see it, which many people refuse to honestly and seriously do.
I've always been sick of the censorship of intelligent design thanks for another amazing video 😀😁
This man is a hero, and has been one for years: the future will revindicate him. The whole world has been shifting in this direction for years and as the truth is progressively revealed, so intelligent design will appear as the only scientifically possible response. There are many others of his calibre working everday towards this goal.
When humanist scientists go to great lengths to stifle opposing thought, it just exposes the weakness of their position!
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.". Schopenhauer.
Thank you for all that you do in order to promulgate the truth, Stephen Meyer!
I teach a Christian Evidence class and Bible Classes at a small OK university and have enjoyed using your material so much. They don't keep a tight rein on me here and your material has received rave review. "is the Bible Reliable" has been a great help also. Thanks so much!
Truth is Truth and ID is truth and atheist will never except an Intelligent Designer, they would rather live in darkness
Excellent presentation Stephen, hopefully most people will hear and understand your clear science and reasoning.
A completely rational and objective analysis of the only comprehensive theory to successfully explain all three conundrums facing science today, which include entropy of the singularity, extreme symmetry of the fundamental constants and forces, and the origin of cellular life. Magnificent!
It is really the powerful against those that have less. Two religions are clashing - evolutionism and creationism. The truth is - one of them is so full of pride it can't admit - it is a religion.
God bless You, Stephen!
May Allah bless you and bless Newton and whoever is fighting or fought for true knowledge to spread
I am thankful for the Courage of men like Stephen Myers and others for their willingness not to cower to the powerful forces that oppose them. Revelation 21 states that the cowardly will have their place in the Lake of Fire.
Stephen Meyer is right because the TRUTH is right. Our Father is making sure that the TRUTH will come out. "The nations will have to know that I am the LORD". God bless your work Dr. Meyer.
Extractly scientific interpretation...
Connecting the dots and interpreting evidence to get a meaningful answer...
Great video. I look forward to watching the rest of this series.
I love the Stephen! Always makes me think about what life is all about. Cant get enough. Brilliant for sure.
Stephen Meyer,
Sir, thank you for this amazing lecture 1.
Waiting for the next lecture.
The mathematical impossibilities of evolution by random mutations is something that scientists are going to have to come to grips with in the coming years. They will have to ignore basic math to cling to Darwinism.
thank you dr Meyer for all your hard work and standing firm for the truth
Thank you Dr. Stephen Meyer for your hard work on this.
I truly appreciate all that you and your staff do, thank you very much!
brilliant and inspiring as usual. Thank you Stephen!!
It's amazing to watch the intricate machinery of the RNA and DNA molecule, and the molecular motors of the most primitive bacteria, and to claim they developed FIRST in the chain of life, and literally billions of years ago. It's not just intelligent design, it's way way more intelligent design,. We can't build those micro machines now.
Great, Stephen. Thank you for your work to know more on this deep subject.
Brief but thought provoking. This should’ve been started much earlier. Waitin’ for the next class Steve.
This is just fantastic and well articulated. I am not an intelligent design proponent myself but I am very much sympathetic to the view though. I will await the follow up episodes in the serie. And yes, I have read signature in the cell when it came out and loved it for one specific reason, the link between 'mind and specified information'. I never really was able to think otherwise since then. 😇
hahahaa! When a theory becomes a religion and fanatics. Darwinism.
LOL, I can tell you're a religious zealot ignorant of science. Thank you for your admission.
1) There's no such thing as darwinism, that is a word made up by those of weak faith.
2) The theory of evolution was devised 100s of years before Darwin was born. Those of science ignorance attribute it to Darwin.
3) evolution is not a belief, it is a conclusion based off of the evidence unlike religion which has ZERO evidence.
I am persuaded by your talk that ID is the best explanation of our origins.
At about 5:15 in the video, Dr. Meyer asks 'Why so much controversy?' Simply put, because Revelation 12:9b ('misleading') & 1 John 5:19 are right on! Nothing Biblical is popular today, especially sexual constraints.
The fact that the opponents to intelligent design resort to rage and academic bulling tactics I take as evidence against the theory they try to protect. If the case for the theory is so good why not just state it clearly, and be honest about the reach and possible limitations of the theory? The way that intelligent design is presented in this channel I find understandable and compelling. This is unlike the impression I get from proponents of neo-darwinian evolution. There I am asked to almost take it by faith in the authority of the experts. They have knowledge not accessible to simpletons like me, and like to throw around academic jargon to strengthen that impression. Some tries to make complex subject comprehensible, others tries to make simple subjects sound incomprehensible for the people outside the select group.
Dr. Meyer,
Thank you for your courageous work as an objective scientist.
Your books should be in all public schools libraries since books on darwinism are most certainly there.
When we walk with the Lord
in the light of his word,
what a glory he sheds on our way!
While we do his good will,
he abides with us still,
and with all who will trust and obey.
Trust and obey, for there's no other way
to be happy in Jesus, but to trust and obey.
2. Not a burden we bear,
not a sorrow we share,
but our toil he doth richly repay;
not a grief or a loss,
not a frown or a cross,
but is blest if we trust and obey.
3 .But we never can prove
the delights of his love
until all on the altar we lay;
for the favor he shows,
for the joy he bestows,
are for them who will trust and obey.
4. Then in fellowship sweet
we will sit at his feet,
or we'll walk by his side in the way;
what he says we will do,
where he sends we will go;
never fear, only trust and obey.
Great lecture Stephen . Glad to support this work just to allow alternative views to be heard .
I've always considered the term "natural selection" to be a loaded term which holds no logical weight .. natural selection intends to infer that nature selects, for example nature selects those mutations (copy mistakes) within the genome that might be beneficial to an organism in specific environments or circumstances. A mutation in the genome that inactivates the possibility of growing short haired coats on dogs in the Arctic would then suggest natural selection "selected" the long hair coated dogs to survive. When in fact all that happened is that the genome sequence was interrupted by a copy mistake, or mutation, which took away the possibility of providing information sequences that could specify the sequencing for both short and long haired animals. Information along the genome was therefore lost and now only long haired dogs populates the environment. If there were any short haired dogs then they simply died becuse of the cold and not because nature selected anything. The ability to select is only found within concious beings with minds. Last time I checked nature was the result or product of something else and nature itself doesn't posess a mind to make concious decicions with; which would include the ability to select .. anything.
I have a very simplistic view based on observation, as a builder, even the simplest of structures require a designer/builder... Even the simplest of organisms in the natural world are far beyond the simplest of structures...
Looking forward to the series. Just a note, the audio is not clear.
Dr. Meyer is one of the brave scientists to challenge evolution as a random process.
"Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out! Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor? Who has ever given to God, that God should repay them? For from him and through him and to him are all things.
To him be the glory forever! Amen."
Use to not like this guy till my eyes turned on (Long time for that cuz I'm 72). I saw that intelligence & consciousness seems to be built into the universe from the quantum level up. I'm not sure I believe in religion Gods but I do feel there is a CNO (Chief 'Ngineering Officer), that could be called God if you want, for the universe. The clues are many & the execution is deep & very mysterious but none the less it looks very real. My mind is much calmer & accepting after leaving the hard atheist camp. Blessing to all (even hard atheists).
Thank you Terry for pointing out a CNO!
I think I know why people don't like intelligent design theory, because it leads us to a Designer . And if we, imperfect people, seeking justice, truth and reason i our lifes existence, eventually at some point, we will have to give an account to This Designer. That's why we are trying to suppress this feeling deep down in our hearts.
The characteristics that the Intelligent Designer reveals align with those of the Christian God (transcends space, time and matter - is eternal and spiritual - and is personal - because the being had to make the choice to create - seemingly of great intelligence - omniscient - seemingly omnipotent - to create time, matter, space, etc.), so that's why many end up being Christians because of it.
Very inspiring!
You have inspired me to learn in my old age. Thank you so much! I love Discovery Science!!
This is great 👍 their evil ways need to be exposed!!!! Thank you for your work .
I loved "Darwin's Doubt"
A must read.
It's on my shelf, finishing up "Signature in the Cell" 👍
Please keep up, your logical explanation and scientific approach are with no doubt the most powerful evidence for the theory of intelligent design
Thank you for this instruction Stephen. Looking forward to further discussions and your newest publication.
Darwin's doubt is one of the best books I have read.
Please work on the sound. It is dull and bassy. Thank you for this lecture. The tide is thankfully turning towards intelligent design. We were oppressed by unlogical and unsientific evolutionistic ideas long enough. I read "Herkunft und Zukunft des Menschen" (~Origin and Future of Mankind) from A. E. Wilder-Smith in the 1990th and since then knew that Intelligent Design is more reasonable than Evolution.
SPOILER the entire video is working backwards, since no evidence for the existence of an "intelligent designer" was presented.
Brilliant!!
Thank you ... Stephen Meyer, your work is amazing. You really have made the truth known. What men think is not as important as what the most intelligent mind thinks.
The Courage to Be. Bravo Dr. Meyer
Thank you Mr Meyer for your lectures!
Im a Muslim but i really respect your work and efforts - Stephen meyer
There is a principle - which is a bar against all information - which is a proof against all argument - and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is condemnation before investigation! Edmund Spenser, English Poet - 1552 -1599. The problem isn't the evidence, becuase the evidence speaks for its self.
The problem is pride.
I’m so looking forward to this lecture series. Signature in the Cell is a fantastic read..
Doing a Google search on alternative theories to evolution I can notice that there is very little information provided, there is really a lot of censure.
Sternberg and Bechly fit the definition:
stal·wart
/ˈstôlwərt/
adjective
loyal, reliable, and hardworking.
"he remained a stalwart supporter of the cause"
*أَمْ خُلِقُوا مِنْ غَيْرِ شَيْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ الْخَالِقُونَ (35)*
*Were they created from nothing? or are they the creators?*
Surat al-tur verse 35 | Quran.
Of course anything can't come out of nothing, that's by logic....or did the creation create itself Which is Also illogical, why don't we see/witness things just pope out of nothingness or did we create ourselves?
I'm a genetic / biology student and saying that the complexity of the digital order of genes (Which are insanely specific and perfectly fit to create life) was just by randomness and chance is the insanity
May Allah bless this honest Man.
Truth remains truth no matter what you believe and your perception of it has zero effect on it. Search for truth while you are alive because when you are dead all opportunity comes to an end. In death you will find truth but it may not be what you thought it was.
Thx teacher 😎. I have been seen your conferences, and they are really edificating. God bless you.
So who or what is the being who 'intelligently designed' the Universe and what was this beings motive for doing do ?
This is a question known as the 'Mc Dougal conundrum' and has yet to be answered.
Excellent!
This is awesome! Those people lying to oppose your work are like little immature devious children having TANTRUMS out of their biases and fears instead of going after truth no-matter what the result. Their reactions are revealing. Keep on keeping on. :)
A clear and articulate lecture. Very insightful.
Thank you for this video!
Thanks for publishing these online. Looking forward to watching them.
Circumstantial evidence for intelligent design far exceeds any other theories, especially Darwin’s theory. Think Michael Behe’s irreducible complexity.
Great Steven!
Intelligent design of life is readily apparent by many microscopic scientific studies. Making the leap of explaining the intelligent design of the universe and scientific laws and theories is not easy to show difinitive scientific facts and more conjecture.
The more I examine the universe and the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense must have known we were coming.
-Freeman Dyson
God bless this man.
Very good Stephen. Remember you only get the flack when you are over the target. ✌
I love Dr Stephen Meyer . I love those whom he loves and those who love him . I pray that ALLAH declares HIS love for him , ameen .
A statistical impossibility is defined as _“a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument."_ (*The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80.) The probability of a functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more *Rational and Reasonable* to conclude that the cell was not formed by undirected random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that undirected random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.)
A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what many of the world’s top scientists _‘must’_ believe in and promote because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material".
The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic subjective ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millenia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by discoveries in Quantum Physics.
It's not just DNA it's also the body
It would be more clear by using animations
Have you looked to the criteria being used n the search for intelligent extraterrestrial life movement as to what represents noise and what represents evidence of intelligence? They must have some criteria. How does the code in dna rank on those criteria?
Superb.
Please release your book sooner, I can't wait another year ☹️☹️☹️
Where is part 2 lecture? Anybody Know?
Would intelligent design imply the creator being the same creator depicted in the Bible?
Learned of this man from Dr Chuck Missler. Another beautiful mind.
Thank you for this.From a grateful homeschool mom!
Which one of this two requires more faith?
1. Something is designed but it doesn’t have a designer.
2. Something is designed so it have to have a designer.
Like for #2
Comment for #1
Thank you for your work on this topic...
Keep up the good work Stephen
Just THANK YOU
Looking forward to it, dear. Admire your work a lot.
There is both material and immaterial (or physical and metaphysical) existence in the cosmos. Arguments for this reality are expounded in the Creationary Synthesis - an alternative to Darwinian evolution.
What is considered the source of intelligent designer? Where did the designer come from?
Nice course!!
In history of mainstream science where few turnarounds in believes and theories.
1. Spontaneous generation of complex life from inanimate matter
2. Flat earth
3. Geocentric model/system
4. Einstein's Static Universe Theory
5. ...
6. Therefore, Darwin theory of evolution could be one of the theories that could be added to this list.
In my opinion, should be more debates with mainstream evolution scientist where these theories and facts could be presented and ask for explanation or proofs.
By liking any RUclips channel or presentation will not make same impact as confronting Scientist at the same level and opening all these ideas, theories, facts and look for the answers and new theories which could better explained
• Origin of Universe
• Origin of life
• How we start to think and speak
• And many more…
From the science book in school we got this kind of explanation :
· And fish by the time developed legs and lungs …and inhabits lands
· And by the time some living animal species developed spine…
For me this is more dogma then science…Word Evolution or developed is used as magic
wand or time machine. Without explanation this is only hypotheses
If Evolution works, does it mean that reverse way is possible… can human become
monkey by the time in the same order of facts… human go back to jungle and by
the time and isolation develop body and brain as monkey
he's exposing the existence of Scientific Gestapo!
Perhaps it's just semantics but does not the term "Natural Selection" have the word "Selection" in it? Therefore does it not stand to reason that to make a selection based on how the environmental factors that are embedded into the fabric of nature necessarily require the ability to make that selection? A selection that would require a conscious intelligence of some sort? Therefore if this is logical and true then it must be that this force that allows and makes possible all the known and as of yet unknown permutations of life has to be "intelligent". To summarily brush off the idea of "Intelligent Design" by simply invoking the words "Natural Selection" in a sort of matter of factly attitude as though it explains everything without the implications of how we define it is short-sighted and typical of anally-retentive, orthodox academics.
so convincing
well done
Hi i am muslim but love you guys at dicovery institute.
If you find a turtle on top of a fence post you know somebody put it there. We didn’t get here by accident.