Mod-01 Lec-01 Introduction to Fluid Machines 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии • 53

  • @claymarksarte4019
    @claymarksarte4019 7 лет назад +30

    Prof. S. K. Som is the best of all.

  • @ashuanand115
    @ashuanand115 5 лет назад +12

    Dear NPTEL thank you so much for these lectures. These lectures are one of the best. Please improve on quality of video (720p or at least clear 480p). Sometimes we can't read the words written on page by sir.

  • @rsr9491
    @rsr9491 4 года назад +6

    Iam so grateful to you sir.and i remember you till my last breathe.

  • @babubhaiya133
    @babubhaiya133 6 лет назад +1

    very good teacher i learnt whole fluid from this teacher salute.

  • @noumaankhan7606
    @noumaankhan7606 9 лет назад +6

    These lectures are very helpful.. thanks..

  • @kishorkmrsahu1443
    @kishorkmrsahu1443 4 года назад +1

    Thnks nptel and pro. S. K. Som

  • @yogeshvanjari9324
    @yogeshvanjari9324 4 года назад +1

    nodoubtat all "Prof. S. K. Som is the best of all."

  • @aldostefanomercandino3971
    @aldostefanomercandino3971 Год назад

    Thanks Master! You are a incredible teacher 🤓

  • @sajidmomin7263
    @sajidmomin7263 8 лет назад +1

    all the lectures are very helpful.

  • @justinfoto
    @justinfoto 7 лет назад +4

    Amazing lecture. Very excited for this series. Thank you Professor Som and nptelhrd for sharing this knowledge. I do have a question though: at 47:05 you said E=T*w, shouldn't this be E=T*theta? Nvm, got it, you defined E as rate of energy transfer.

  • @kamalinidevi4259
    @kamalinidevi4259 3 года назад +1

    thank you sir so much for meticulous explanation

  • @SoumilSahu
    @SoumilSahu 4 года назад +9

    For anyone annoyed by the right channel audio: turn mono audio on in your computer settings

  • @RakeshKumar-qg7ww
    @RakeshKumar-qg7ww 8 лет назад

    your lecture is very helpful for us thank you sir..........

  • @rudranewt4934
    @rudranewt4934 7 лет назад

    Sir thank you for help us...god bless you sir

  • @sahilrajeshgajbhiye4968
    @sahilrajeshgajbhiye4968 4 года назад +1

    Ty very much sir

  • @ashutoshacharya316
    @ashutoshacharya316 2 года назад

    God Level

  • @firozahmad1396
    @firozahmad1396 7 лет назад

    very useful for me.. thanks

  • @nishantpoudel6768
    @nishantpoudel6768 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you so much...

  • @rahulhrsg
    @rahulhrsg 9 лет назад +1

    many thanks...

  • @yigitcan824
    @yigitcan824 13 дней назад

    Is this video About fluid mechanics 2?

  • @Punitrathod24
    @Punitrathod24 6 месяцев назад

    Can anyone explain me 47:37 how w is converted into u2 and u1

    • @yigitcan824
      @yigitcan824 13 дней назад

      Is this playlist about fluid mechanics 2?

  • @varunrasalkar4286
    @varunrasalkar4286 3 года назад +2

    has anyone prepared notes from these lecture series? if yes, please share.

  • @azharuddinmohammad8663
    @azharuddinmohammad8663 4 года назад +1

    at 4:16 someone has coughed . if it was 2020, the class would have been stopped.

  • @vimlendukumar3200
    @vimlendukumar3200 6 лет назад +2

    36:31 how Vr1 cosb1=Vw1?

  • @aman2426
    @aman2426 5 лет назад +1

    Which textbook?

  • @Vivekyadav-fj8nq
    @Vivekyadav-fj8nq 8 лет назад +1

    in which year he made this lecture series

  • @kushagrasrivastava5905
    @kushagrasrivastava5905 6 лет назад +1

    There is a very trivial doubt I have,
    Please anyone answer it,
    The Euler Turbine equation developed here is valid because u1 = u2 = u
    Howsoever, If u1 is not equal to u2, The equation would fail, as per the proof shown here.
    So, why then, is this applied to steam turbines or centrifugal compressors.

    • @mech-www7563
      @mech-www7563 6 лет назад

      I too want to know th e answer for that...
      But in impulse turbine U1 and u2 will be cancelled out but in reaction turbine it was not

    • @kushagrasrivastava5905
      @kushagrasrivastava5905 6 лет назад +1

      @@mech-www7563 I have figured it out in my course of time. The Force calculated here by use of changes in relative velocity is valid only for some cases. However, the force is actually calculated by difference of absolute velocities and not relative velocites. So if you were to calculated force by use of absolute velocities only, you will always get the right answer. Only rocket is an exception to it, due to a different mechanism prevailing in it.

    • @mech-www7563
      @mech-www7563 6 лет назад +1

      @@kushagrasrivastava5905
      Thank you dude

  • @TeachingLearningPlace
    @TeachingLearningPlace 7 лет назад

    thank u so much sir,,,

  • @nikariff18
    @nikariff18 7 лет назад

    im interested to learn this in the future, what is the prerequisite for the subject, is fluid mechanics already enough?

  • @ErVivek-ru7xc
    @ErVivek-ru7xc 8 лет назад +1

    sir please send me fm1 complete lecture set

  • @atharhusainsiddique942
    @atharhusainsiddique942 6 лет назад

    Voice is not coming

  • @arbaaz3490
    @arbaaz3490 7 лет назад +4

    Kash IIT clear kar jata

  • @shaileshpray
    @shaileshpray 8 лет назад

    sound isn't coming...:(

  • @shoveit5826
    @shoveit5826 10 лет назад

    Can I get a copy in English?

    • @TheManzico
      @TheManzico 8 лет назад

      shove it, you are an ingrate😱

    • @shoveit5826
      @shoveit5826 8 лет назад

      +Isaac Ayodeji go pound sand, fuckbasket

    • @TheManzico
      @TheManzico 8 лет назад

      Shove It you are a fucking FART! by the way you write. Dumbwit!!

    • @sudarshanshetty8892
      @sudarshanshetty8892 7 лет назад

      Thank you so much. Sir...

  • @sahilgajbhiye0656
    @sahilgajbhiye0656 3 года назад +1

    ty very much sir