Some people start talking gibberish when they get older. Ramesh seemed to get more adept at putting forward his "concept" the older he got. Some of his final talks are his best but at any age he was always fascinating to me. What a privilege to listen to this man. Such a great orator and gentle spirit. We could do with a few more like him but I don't think they come round that often. I'm just grateful to have heard this "concept" explained by such a witty and excellent speaker. Although I'm sure he'd take no credit and claim that God/ Source made him do it. ☯😁
Ramesh said here that:- 35:11 For a sage, both separateness and oneness exist as part of the duality of life. 33:42 Oneness lies in the total, unconditional acceptance that all our differences (separateness) are only in appearances. Underneath, there is a total acceptance that it is the same consciousness, or source, or God, [that is] functioning through everyone. If somebody's action hurts 'me', then it is God's will, and the destiny of this body-mind organism to be hurt. Acceptance of this is 'oneness'.
Ramesh said at 35:28 to 37,50 :- Accept that samsara (the issues of your physical lives) are the waves in the ocean, and that the depths of the ocean is nirvana. When you get tossed about by the waves [of life], it is 'me' - the ego. So all you have to do, if you are able, is to go slightly deeper into the ocean, where it is found that no one is the 'doer' of any actions. With this realisation, you can never hate others. No expectations - no wants.
😇अहिंसा परमो धर्म 😇 ahiṃsā paramo dharma (“non-harm is the HIGHEST religious principle” or “non-violence is the GREATEST law”). Therefore, only a strict VEGAN can claim to be an adherent of the eternal religion (sanātana dharma).🌱
I am not really concerned about what any particular person BELIEVES. You may believe that there is an old man with a white beard perched in the clouds, that the Ultimate Reality is a young blackish-blue Indian guy, that the universe is eternal, that Mother Mary was a certifiable virgin, or that gross physical matter is the foundation of existence. The ONLY thing that really matters is your meta-ethics, not your meta-physics. Do you consider any form of non-monarchical government (such as democracy or socialism) to be beneficial? Do you unnecessarily destroy the lives of poor, innocent animals and gorge on their bloody carcasses? Do you believe homosexuality and transvestism are moral? Do you consider feminist ideology to be righteous? If so, then you are objectively immoral, and your so-called "enlightened/awakened" state is immaterial, since it does not benefit society in any way.
Can I please ask, something I don’t understand - Ramesh tell us to make a decision but not to expect a particular outcome as it’s all down to god’s grace/plan as to what will happen (ok that’s cool get that) But then he states that there is no chooser, no thinker, no doer - get that too great. But what gets me is, if there is no doer who makes the decision because you could call the entity making the decision the chooser or the doer?? Please help, am I missing something?
"Who makes the decision". There is not an entity that makes a decision. Just that the activity of decision-making happens. There is no doer, only doing. There is no chooser, only choosing. In other words, decision-making is just the activity of the body-mind organism. You can sort of think of it as pre-programmed process. It simply occurs. It's only after the decision is made that thought comes in and says "I did that" and forms some story about a doer doing the action or making the decision.
@@Gaurav.P0 Krishnamurti never accepted that he was not “ the doer” and more importantly that the other was not the doer. He was lost and often confused as a result of this non acceptance.
@@edwardkeenan7354 I'm not alluding. I'm not hinting or being indirect. I'm responding directly to what Ramesh Balsekar said about his preference for teaching people who are financially secure in the video I assume you watched. I'm directly contrasting two very different approaches.
@@edwardkeenan7354 I don't understand your confusion. Did you hear what Ramesh said about this in this very video? So listen to that and then compare it with what I said. I'm not asking any questions at this point.
@@smolderingtitan well then why start a sentence with “did” and end it with a question mark? No matter I don’t care enough to keep going on this. God Bless
Some people start talking gibberish when they get older. Ramesh seemed to get more adept at putting forward his "concept" the older he got. Some of his final talks are his best but at any age he was always fascinating to me. What a privilege to listen to this man. Such a great orator and gentle spirit. We could do with a few more like him but I don't think they come round that often. I'm just grateful to have heard this "concept" explained by such a witty and excellent speaker. Although I'm sure he'd take no credit and claim that God/ Source made him do it. ☯😁
He was good at counting money and then tried to pay for it through spirituality.
Great and lowly are RELATIVE. 😉
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Ramesh said here that:- 35:11 For a sage, both separateness and oneness exist as part of the duality of life. 33:42 Oneness lies in the total, unconditional acceptance that all our differences (separateness) are only in appearances. Underneath, there is a total acceptance that it is the same consciousness, or source, or God, [that is] functioning through everyone. If somebody's action hurts 'me', then it is God's will, and the destiny of this body-mind organism to be hurt. Acceptance of this is 'oneness'.
Are you a THEIST? 🤔
If so, what are the reasons for your BELIEF in God? 🤓
how sweet this man is how honest he speaks
A sweet SINNER. 😢
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Ramesh said at 35:28 to 37,50 :- Accept that samsara (the issues of your physical lives) are the waves in the ocean, and that the depths of the ocean is nirvana. When you get tossed about by the waves [of life], it is 'me' - the ego. So all you have to do, if you are able, is to go slightly deeper into the ocean, where it is found that no one is the 'doer' of any actions. With this realisation, you can never hate others. No expectations - no wants.
Hg ggc
cgggg
Vggyhghhygglgu
upgradingTC giveitgoodgg
Yh
Your
I love him so much ♥️
Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Thanks for that!!!
This is a beautiful no nonsense explanation of the essence of the philosophy. I am so grateful. Thank you so much. You’ve improved my life by 1000%
😇अहिंसा परमो धर्म 😇
ahiṃsā paramo dharma
(“non-harm is the HIGHEST religious principle” or “non-violence is the GREATEST law”).
Therefore, only a strict VEGAN can claim to be an adherent of the eternal religion (sanātana dharma).🌱
Interesting hearing Ramesh comments about JK being so grateful and same time being critical
I am not really concerned about what any particular person BELIEVES. You may believe that there is an old man with a white beard perched in the clouds, that the Ultimate Reality is a young blackish-blue Indian guy, that the universe is eternal, that Mother Mary was a certifiable virgin, or that gross physical matter is the foundation of existence.
The ONLY thing that really matters is your meta-ethics, not your meta-physics.
Do you consider any form of non-monarchical government (such as democracy or socialism) to be beneficial?
Do you unnecessarily destroy the lives of poor, innocent animals and gorge on their bloody carcasses?
Do you believe homosexuality and transvestism are moral?
Do you consider feminist ideology to be righteous?
If so, then you are objectively immoral, and your so-called "enlightened/awakened" state is immaterial, since it does not benefit society in any way.
Treasured videos! Thanks for sharing.
Ty for time n wise words duality is chaos n chaos life n life is at a dual
Great message 💓
Great and lowly are RELATIVE. 😉
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
🙏❤️
31:19 the sage lives in duality accepting both as one.
Wow!!!❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🏼❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
🕉 Namashivayaaa 🌸🙏
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
good onya m8 thanks for sharing
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
🙏
Saint
Sinner
The most lucid Adviata teacher I've heard.
Silence
Thought arise (gods will)
Thinking is horizontal movement
🙇🏽♂️💞
Is turyia the same as we experience in death? I wonder if the fourth, is when we merge with Brahman during death.
❤🙏🌹1.04.50
Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
“It would be insult to injury to speak to a hungry man about Advaita.” (Around 7 minutes)
Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
There is duality but no need for dualism
Super! Thank you : )
Si, claro...😏
Even I would do the same....teach Nirvana and Advaita to financially secure people particularly in the West :-) my retirement plan.
6gyg ggggg7y7gvyhg
Can I please ask, something I don’t understand -
Ramesh tell us to make a decision but not to expect a particular outcome as it’s all down to god’s grace/plan as to what will happen (ok that’s cool get that)
But then he states that there is no chooser, no thinker, no doer - get that too great.
But what gets me is, if there is no doer who makes the decision because you could call the entity making the decision the chooser or the doer??
Please help, am I missing something?
"Who makes the decision". There is not an entity that makes a decision. Just that the activity of decision-making happens. There is no doer, only doing. There is no chooser, only choosing. In other words, decision-making is just the activity of the body-mind organism. You can sort of think of it as pre-programmed process. It simply occurs. It's only after the decision is made that thought comes in and says "I did that" and forms some story about a doer doing the action or making the decision.
@@silentobserver6908 if that's so, why are "they" needing to make decisions?
Accept to choose to do
Listen to Jiddu Krishnamurti... You will get answers of your questions.
@@Gaurav.P0 Krishnamurti never accepted that he was not “ the doer” and more importantly that the other was not the doer. He was lost and often confused as a result of this non acceptance.
Not to decide is also a decision
Here 1= 0
And yes = Not
Ha ha ha😄
LOL did Ramana Maharshi care if people were financially secure before he taught them?
what are you eluding to here?
@@edwardkeenan7354 I'm not alluding. I'm not hinting or being indirect. I'm responding directly to what Ramesh Balsekar said about his preference for teaching people who are financially secure in the video I assume you watched. I'm directly contrasting two very different approaches.
@@smolderingtitan are you asking a question in response? Sorry it’s confusing
@@edwardkeenan7354 I don't understand your confusion. Did you hear what Ramesh said about this in this very video? So listen to that and then compare it with what I said. I'm not asking any questions at this point.
@@smolderingtitan well then why start a sentence with “did” and end it with a question mark? No matter I don’t care enough to keep going on this. God Bless
Great talks by Ramesh,but the people here who paid to listen to him asked some really stupid and confusing questions.