Neto can play LW & RW, Palmer can play behind the striker and on the right too, Neto and Palmer together is not the mismatch Stevie is making it out to be. The questions about Neto’s injury history are legit though.
Chelsea are crazy honestly. It's like chatgpt is making the signings😂 How can a normal person make so many signings. Especially wingers. I think the directors are robots/spam🤞😂
Because Chelsea plays on the wings, so they need Wingers that can either play RW/LW or as RM & LM. Depends on the game formation. Also, it’s been proven seasons after seasons that Chelsea cant rely on players staying fit and injury free throughout the season, so they need enough depth for backup.
@@PedroNeves-hm5xmis impossible for a player that has done nothing in his career to be better than one with like three times his appearances for Chelsea and England.
@mohtalk @gobomladikk5197 A couple of glass half empty folks I see. There’s a simple solution to that. Chelsea have a ton of wingers. Manage their minutes and create healthy competition between all of them to get the best version of each player, keep them motivated, keep them fit, and the team collectively benefits.
TBF and coming from a rival, Neto is a good signing and probably their best winger minus Palmer. The big issue is his fitness and that's why £54m is a huge risk but it might pay off for them
@@prezijay5220Boehly has basically nothing to do with Chelsea anymore. He was real involved early on but not now. Don’t have opinions on things you don’t know about
When you have two sporting directors the conversation goes like this: Director A to Director B "I want this guy. B to A." No I want the other guy. A to B " No I want this guy" B to A " No I want the other guy. A to B "Look let's just buy both. The owners won't notice and they have more money than brains anyway." Result is a squad twice the size needed.
Bro it's no longer about who Chelsea sign, its about how many more??? Chelsea currently have a 50 man squad with a rookie manager and we already saw how that went before 🤷♂️
For all the Chelsea fans getting excited by all these signings, let's explain what's going on.. clearlake is an investment firm and see players as a tradable commodity to make a profit and CFC as a vehicle to do so, which is what they do with other assets that they buy as well (say an underperforming factory with potential that can be turned around and then sold to make a profit).. these guys have a track record of being successful at it, so it can be very profitable if it works.. however, it's a little naive to think these signings are to achieve success on the pitch
@@georgemark8593 If u have seen Lavia this preszn you'll have seen passes you haven't seen from gallagher ever. Not to mention his dribbling, defending, decision making and overall game. You'll see in time.
@@georgemark8593 Lavia was out for the whole season listen Connor played his heart out but he is not more talented than those guys. But he does work really hard and I love him for that
@@georgemark8593 name a single game. running around like a headless chicken isnt carrying. the times gallagher was one the best in the team were the times when we were dreadful and losing many games
Palmer carried us not Gallagher, the Arsenal game Palmer miss where was Gallagher, he is good as a squared player but if we actually want to compete, he can't be in our first eleven
The "method" is that they're playing Football Manager in real life🤣 But I've got to say: Liverpool, Chelsea, Newcastle, Aston Villa, oh boy I hope I'm not getting excited for no reason but the top five head to head battles is looking like a delicious Prospect this season! After the Community Shield it kinda looks like Pep isn't evolving his side, Haaland wandering around like a lost puppy without DeBrunye's assists.
This is so wrong on so many levels. - Neto is versatile he will probably be on the left. - Neto is better than Sterling and Mudryk. Neither are great at retaining the ball, just good at running forward. - Palmer is right wing. He can go central if needed, but he is best on the right. - Nkunku will be CAM but can play multiple positions. Quite simply, I believe Chelsea is ready to move on from Sterling and Mudryk. They know what they are, and they are not that good.
No they didn't, they offered 36m rising to 40m for Lavia and were rejected so then offered 110m for Caicedo. Chelsea then offered 115m for Caicedo and paid about 53m for Lavia. Same as with Mudryk, Arsenal offered 45m and Chelsea blew them away by offering 68m rising to 85m.
Quality player IF fit. But can’t ignore he’s missed over 100 games thru injury in the past 3 seasons. That’s an average of 34 games missed each season. Big risk signing.
@@kleec495hes not 85 , can people stop saying this 80+ nonsense, there like 20m hard add-ons (but yes even thats a lot - the Boehly took a risk and overpayed for players at the time for “potential”, his decision )
@@st4rbl1nd-ab It's not a nonsense since Arsenal offered 60m for him at that time and he was flirting with Arsenal, but then the 20m difference did matter.
Jackson is a player who could make a big leap forward this year at still only 23. He not only had 5 goals and 2 assists in the last 8 Premier League matches of last season but he looked like he was really starting to fully settle into the fast paced nature of the league. As much as people mock him, I think he’s low key one of the most all around skilled forwards in the entire league. His dribbling skills, close control, physicality, strength, running off the ball, combination play, movement into the channels, and tenacity are all excellent. He just needs to show more composure this year and he’ll definitely pass his 14 Premier League goals from last season.
Lets be honest mate, people still dog on Havertz and wrongly say Arsenal have to sign a forward bc he only got 13 goals in the league last season. (Granted he is clearly an off ball specialist whereas I don’t see Jackson in that regard) At the end of the day other fans will and even alot of actual fans will not believe in a “forward” if they don’t bag 18+ goals consistently
Huge upgrade on Mudryk. He's the 3rd best winger in the league imo. Their attack is looking extremely good. If they can get a half decent 9 then their attack is complete and that's the platform for them to build off.
@@cranberrydaddy8529 based on pure talent yes he is, last season he was building his consistency back up again and looked extremely good. The only negative of him is he's injury prone. I don't pay attention to FIFA, I actually watch and analyse players properly.🤷🏽♂️
I don’t think ex footballers understand amortization. Nobody is gonna buy Murray for 70M, but we signed him on a 7 year deal costing us about 10 M a year, this will be his 3rd year he’s still under 23 years old on very low wages you can easily make your money back by selling for 40M
Yes, if you buy a player for 70m and amortize that costs over a period of 7 years (10m per season) only 40m will remain after three seasons. So you will be able to recoup your losses if you sell the player for 40m. How is that better than the competition though? If you buy a player for 70m and amortize the costs over a period of 5 years (14 m per season) only 28m will remain after three seasons and you will be able to sell that same 40m player with a 12m profit.
@@jornfalk9262 I don’t approve of this Chelsea strategy at all I think it is ridiculous but you have to take salary into account they give lower salary to the young players they are signing. If you sign a 24 years old and he didn’t perform well in 3 years he will be 27 on a very high salary which no other club will want to pay and take that risk on a 27 years old.
I understand amortization but it's nonsense because of how much they are doing it. It's a joke. Plastic club. Neto is so injury prone only circa 50 league appearances in the last 3 years.
Thats what frank doesnt understand, chelsea doesnt need to sell the players that failed for the same fee or even a similar fee, if you bought a mudryk for 80 milion chelsea keeps it in the team for 1-2-3 years up untill they eventually give up on him, and then they put him on loan up until there is a team thats willing to buy mudryk or whomever other player it might be for the residual balance on the books they still have. If you fail you didnt lose money, but you still tried the most exciting young prospects on the market, and if you succeed you have great players to compete with. Might not be the best plan but its a plan
This player Neto is a excellent player if it was Liverpool arsenal and man-city buy Neto why will all going crazy for them these pundits is Chelsea heater and this is no joke
This channel caters for people who hate Chelsea, which is basically Liverpool and ManU fans. If Chelsea cured cancer these nobodies would run a story about Chelsea putting doctors out of work.
Bro you missing the point. Chelsea already 41 I repeat 41 first team players. Yea Neto would be a good player if they didn't have all the wingers they already have smh
It’s not always about that though. Look at PSG. And you have to factor in fit and their salaries as well. And egos. They are building a team for longevity and dominance
@@junioradult6219 not really if you have the resources. And if you’re referring to Mudryk he’s an investment (like most of their signings) and has the potential to be one of the best if everything falls into place. And if he doesn’t then tough luck but you have to take risks in order to win🤷♂️. Lot of fans/people are just salty their teams don’t have 1. The resources that Chelsea have and 2. Not as proactive. Better than just sitting there and doing nothing lol
Pundits criticized Roman Abramovich and his transfers; moaned about stacking the academy and not giving them a path to the first team. Boehly buys young players and brings them into the first team, pundits still groan. It's all about talking points for you guys, no matter what a club does.
all i will say is rewatch the espn video of all these pundits talking about palmer joining chelsea, these lot are clueless and do zero critical analysis if you watch that video you will know Neto will perform for chelsea and they will look further clueless yet again
These pundits are bullocks, they dont comprehend anything at all. Can someone tell me what exactly are they good at??? They are all smeared with jealousy, hate towards Chelsea. Steve, Don, Gab, Craig, perhaps Shaka... I'm tired of them talking trash against Chelsea and Manchester United. Give a benefit of a doubt to these clubs. Remember they're on serious transitions.
@historianofmanythings4294 this comment is peak idiocy... Neymar forced his way out and Messi deal renewal failed... and Chelsea doesn't generate as much income as Barca
As a Chelsea fan I dont understand the strategy yet, I dont think its about winning anymore, its just a business now, a new coach and different players every season, am lossing morale in football.
What is Frank talking even talking about? Selling Caicedo and Enzo should be the least of Chelsea’s concerns. That’s your starting midfield for the next 10 years
problem is u can put only 11 players on the pitch and u can have around 5-6 as reserves so what are the rest of the players doing if they are not even on the reserves?
@@zephune9506 Because it is a complex calculation that involves amortization of future contracts, and takes into account wages etc. Obviously Chelsea know the numbers better than you do. Fans of other clubs (who could do the same thing) are just jealous that Chelsea has ambition while their clubs' owners just want to rake in the cash.
@@daleviker5884 amortised or not, they have to pay the fee by time the contract expires including all the wages. Buying on finance doesn’t mean you pay less.
Gab does not know what he’s talking bout balancing books big time, go over the signings the length of the contracts and the outgoings when you look at the actual net spend it’s barely over 100m not to mention you still have a bunch of players they will get good money for out going it isn’t a hard concept to grasp they have assets to sell. Chelsea always have Cobham to use for pure profit even if players turn out as busts they still have the best academy in the world for selling players as a back up
You're ignoring the transfers that are still being amortized from before. You can't on one hand say Neto's transfer will be amortized so no big deal and ignore you're still paying Lukakus transfer etc..
@@russellward4624 it’s not ignoring the fact people keep bringing this up like its a big surprise Chelsea has what no other clubs have an abundance of and that’s endless assets they can sell to balance the books. No other club in the prem is selling players like Chelsea is and for the amount of money the club is selling players for either lukaku is an anomaly look how many outgoings and money has come in the last two seasons Kai havertz mason mount and Gallagher alone are $165 million in profit. Two of them pure profit that’s from THREE players name 1 other club in the prem that’s done that
When are “we signing Osimhen”? The season is almost starting, signing a forward was the priority even last season, but signed Jackson 2.0. The joke is not funny anymore.
I am a Chelsea supporter through and through, idk the first XI that is going to line up against City on August 18, rn I don’t know the recruitment system, scouting or the philosophy of how we going to play & tbh I am WORRIED 😢
Who will sell their experience players to you anyway. Buy Vini from Madrid? Or Musiala? You make your own winner. My only problem is the board buying too many players though the squad is bloated.
That’s Possible Chelsea line up is FIREEEEE.. only glaring miss is the striker.. Jackson is too inconsistent.. besides the keeper and Badi in defence they’d all comfortably play in the top 3 teams
Finally a smart signing for Chelsea, proven quality, however, the injury issues have to be a worry. I think it's the only reason there isn't a queue if clubs after him
Why do you keep saying Mudryk was £85 mill He wasn’t, and you know that. £68 mill, add ons of we win the league and CL, so never gonna happen any time soon.
Chelae’s acting like when u just gave ur lil brother unlimited money in career mode 😭😭
Aww you’re mad
😅😅😅😅😅
This is what happens when you know how to manage your books. You can hate us now. (but we won't stop now.)
😂😂😂😂😂
▪︎Chelsea,Utd buying Clubs
▪︎But Media accuse City
▪︎PL charge/accuse City
▪︎Though City held not guilty in Court?😂
"The guy is bang average"😂😂😂Steve is so funny when he's taking shots at Chelsea/United players
I mean look at his numbers?
@@seleimonikhe1164 9 assists in 18 starts doesnt scream average
😂😂 the cope is crazy Chelsea now have the best winger pairing in soccer easily
@@ahmedegal6808 you mean Pedro Netto and Raheem Sterling? Or need to add Murdyk into the equation?
@@kleec495lol he means sterling neto lw and palmer and madueke on rw
😂Frank smiling throughout the segment Lol
He knows, but he keeps quiet 😂
Hutchinson saying Gallagher is better than Lavia says it ALL
Right. They didn’t watch the pre-season.
Lavia was unlike with injuries last year. Lavia is miles better than Gallagher.
Should we tell him 🤣🤣🤣
He is.
Usual massive hype. Massively praising a player who has played 30 games in his career.
Neto can play LW & RW, Palmer can play behind the striker and on the right too, Neto and Palmer together is not the mismatch Stevie is making it out to be. The questions about Neto’s injury history are legit though.
That gab guy just called djordje petrovic "Sasha petrovik" 💀
I don’t know how many wingers Chelsea needs, but he’s better than Mykhailo Mudryk. 😅
I don't know if you kick ball mate but I can guarantee your better than mudryk too 🤣😂
Fernando was brought the year and a half ago and Casado was brought last summer, so what’s that to do with balance in books for this summer?
@@Topblue59Its a rolling 3 year period dude not just a single year smh
@@Topblue59these espn guys just hate Chelsea, always whining about the club.
Shouldn't they have thought about your point?
Chelsea are crazy honestly. It's like chatgpt is making the signings😂 How can a normal person make so many signings. Especially wingers. I think the directors are robots/spam🤞😂
bitter
@@studentstopnet he's right, why are Chelsea still signing players
reminds me of career mode signings in fifa
@@studentstopnetstfu! If you have nothing reasonable to say.
Because Chelsea plays on the wings, so they need Wingers that can either play RW/LW or as RM & LM. Depends on the game formation. Also, it’s been proven seasons after seasons that Chelsea cant rely on players staying fit and injury free throughout the season, so they need enough depth for backup.
They said we need to balance our books for about 3 years now 😂
And you've had to sell your training ground, a hotel and the women's team to yourselves to keep your head above water
And still havent won a trophy to bring funds. 😂
@@davejordan9776that was hilarious stuff 😂 boehly the mastermind just sold hotels to himself
@@davejordan9776 😂😂😂 sounds genius to me
@@davejordan9776that’s why you still broke 😅 you don’t know jack about finance or economics, let the billionaires do what they do!
Lavia not better than Gallagher...blud is researching on Fifa 24
Well, he is not. Conor was besides Palmer the best player during the previous season..
@@Dandinskij26he was consistent but his peaks a nowhere near those a Lavia can reach technically Lavia is levels above
@@Dandinskij26lavia was injured in fairness
@@PedroNeves-hm5xmis impossible for a player that has done nothing in his career to be better than one with like three times his appearances for Chelsea and England.
@@acruzro95 it’s not about what he has done it’s about what he will do, he’s only 20
Lavia is better than Gallagher
You've got exactly zero evidence to support that.
No he isn’t
By far 💯
100%
Defensively it is debatable
Reece James is suspended for the first 3 PL games. Cucurella is the starting LB in the team, not Colwill. These guys should've done better research.
These pundits can moan all they want but Neto is an excellent signing for Chelsea. He’s a gem of a player.
if he is fit....
Another injury prone winger let’s go!
@mohtalk
@gobomladikk5197
A couple of glass half empty folks I see. There’s a simple solution to that. Chelsea have a ton of wingers. Manage their minutes and create healthy competition between all of them to get the best version of each player, keep them motivated, keep them fit, and the team collectively benefits.
@@Photosoflife54 mil for a squad player. They’ve paid 200 mil for wingers and none of them can start LMAO
No he's not.
The only weakness in that XI is the defense. Midfield to forward is very good
Seeing last season I doubt that midfield
KDH seems decent. Lavia feels like a new signing @@georgemark8593
@@georgemark8593poch had that midfield so spread out.
Are you really a Chelsea fan??? Because no grown up Chelsea fan thinks having a 50 man squad is ideal especially after Potter's season
striker?
TBF and coming from a rival, Neto is a good signing and probably their best winger minus Palmer. The big issue is his fitness and that's why £54m is a huge risk but it might pay off for them
Chelsea is so bloated you can create formations inside the formation. You can even do the famous “443” with the midfielders alone
Bohely is not part of this buying spree anymore... This group loves to hate Chelsea point blank.
Did u really made that statement with a str8 face?
Does make it less sus?
@@prezijay5220 well it's the truth
@@prezijay5220 Boehly owns less than 14 percent of chelsea. Majority is Clearlake capital....
@@prezijay5220Boehly has basically nothing to do with Chelsea anymore. He was real involved early on but not now. Don’t have opinions on things you don’t know about
These "pro analysts" dont even know James cant play next few games cuz of red card lol... where do they find these guys?
and they say Neto is a RW
When you have two sporting directors the conversation goes like this:
Director A to Director B "I want this guy. B to A." No I want the other guy.
A to B " No I want this guy" B to A " No I want the other guy.
A to B "Look let's just buy both.
The owners won't notice and they have more money than brains anyway."
Result is a squad twice the size needed.
ESPN at it again. Classic moaners!! Always moaning when it's about Chelsea!
Maybe you should give the club back to Abramovich
And compete in Russian Premier League? Russia are even banned in olympic.
Naah we don’t need another filthy Oligarch in the EPL
First thing he will do is sell that Ukrainian misfit
Sell Kepa, Casadei and Lukaku to Napoli for Osimehn
Every signing is a negative signing according to these people this is so boring man
Liverpool haven't made a signing yet, so what you expect him to say
They didn't think Calafiori and Solanke are negative signings
@@kleec495 every Chelsea signing*
How delusional are you 🙄 who thinks this s good idea 40+ players
Bro it's no longer about who Chelsea sign, its about how many more??? Chelsea currently have a 50 man squad with a rookie manager and we already saw how that went before 🤷♂️
For all the Chelsea fans getting excited by all these signings, let's explain what's going on.. clearlake is an investment firm and see players as a tradable commodity to make a profit and CFC as a vehicle to do so, which is what they do with other assets that they buy as well (say an underperforming factory with potential that can be turned around and then sold to make a profit).. these guys have a track record of being successful at it, so it can be very profitable if it works.. however, it's a little naive to think these signings are to achieve success on the pitch
“You can’t tell me right now Lavia is better than Gallagher” I can and I will
He ain't though. Dude carried us on so many games last season
@@georgemark8593 If u have seen Lavia this preszn you'll have seen passes you haven't seen from gallagher ever. Not to mention his dribbling, defending, decision making and overall game. You'll see in time.
@@georgemark8593 Lavia was out for the whole season listen Connor played his heart out but he is not more talented than those guys. But he does work really hard and I love him for that
@@georgemark8593 name a single game. running around like a headless chicken isnt carrying. the times gallagher was one the best in the team were the times when we were dreadful and losing many games
Palmer carried us not Gallagher, the Arsenal game Palmer miss where was Gallagher, he is good as a squared player but if we actually want to compete, he can't be in our first eleven
This pundits are the most stupid they are going to flip flop all season long
It's *THESE* not this. FFS!!! 🙄
How dare they say bringing in more players than saint lucia's population is not the best way to run a football club
@@johnnybgoode4778😂😂
@@johnnybgoode4778😂😂😂😂
@@johnnybgoode4778teach us how to run a football club and almighty expert
I like this signing. But overall we have been signing mid players.
He started making me blink on my break at work.
Someone please count the blinks 😂😅
Same you guys complain we have not signed a proven player now we have signed y’all complaining
Same proven player that score 11 epl goals in 5 seasons and is injury prone. Typical chelsea signing
Both of you are right though
@@Xxxxyyy734 no the player with 11 g/a in 18 starts last season also player never scored a premier league before chelae signing
You still trying to defend this bs is just disgusting 🤮
Caicedo was a proven player and he’s been garbage at Chelsea.
When Gab is talking you shut up Dan!
😂😂
These guys forgot to mention that Chelsea appears to be very good at surplus players for very good prices. Except for Lukaku.
What the heck is Gab speaking about when you got Enzo, Caiceido, Mudryk, Lavia for 400m what you gonna sell them on for 600? Bull!
This pundits is so funny sometimes. Haha. I hope no one take them seriuosly.
How many wingers do you need???
Chelsea: Yes.
14:25 so Cucurella doesn’t exist anymore? Seems to me that he’s clearly the best LB at the club and Colwill can play LCB
The "method" is that they're playing Football Manager in real life🤣
But I've got to say:
Liverpool, Chelsea, Newcastle, Aston Villa, oh boy I hope I'm not getting excited for no reason but the top five head to head battles is looking like a delicious Prospect this season!
After the Community Shield it kinda looks like Pep isn't evolving his side, Haaland wandering around like a lost puppy without DeBrunye's assists.
Neto plays best on the left hand side, geezus guys
This is so wrong on so many levels.
- Neto is versatile he will probably be on the left.
- Neto is better than Sterling and Mudryk. Neither are great at retaining the ball, just good at running forward.
- Palmer is right wing. He can go central if needed, but he is best on the right.
- Nkunku will be CAM but can play multiple positions.
Quite simply, I believe Chelsea is ready to move on from Sterling and Mudryk. They know what they are, and they are not that good.
You forget Liverpool bid 120m pounds for Caicedo same to Lavia
Not now dude
No they didn't, they offered 36m rising to 40m for Lavia and were rejected so then offered 110m for Caicedo. Chelsea then offered 115m for Caicedo and paid about 53m for Lavia. Same as with Mudryk, Arsenal offered 45m and Chelsea blew them away by offering 68m rising to 85m.
Chelsea will surprised you all
Relegation?
Quality player IF fit. But can’t ignore he’s missed over 100 games thru injury in the past 3 seasons. That’s an average of 34 games missed each season. Big risk signing.
All rival fans will say this but would take many chelsea players in a heartbeat. Arsenal an example
@@studentstopnet tf you mean all rival fans will say this? I’m literally stating facts. Mans legs made of string cheese lol
@@studentstopnet as a chelsea fan hes a risk signing hes injury prone
Why should they sell Caiedo and Enzo and no way you telling me those 2 aren't good enough to start for every prem team
Wait what happens to Madueke now?!
Bench impact probably
You don’t even know the way Chelsea plays and the system
They really dont
How do you want us to play? Rival fans are bleeding 😂😂
@@akindeayodeji722what do you mean... Do you have an identity yourself?
They don’t have a system or a way of play. Have you seen them lately? 😂
@@gravityent9943yes and we clearly do
Sterling, Noni, Misha, Neto. 4.
Same as every big club ffs.
how about your 85m Mudryk?
@kleec495 you talk here and don't know that Misha means Mudryk
@@kleec495hes not 85 , can people stop saying this 80+ nonsense, there like 20m hard add-ons (but yes even thats a lot - the Boehly took a risk and overpayed for players at the time for “potential”, his decision )
@@st4rbl1nd-ab It's not a nonsense since Arsenal offered 60m for him at that time and he was flirting with Arsenal, but then the 20m difference did matter.
@@kleec495 it was widely reported. you can look it up for yourself
More remarkable than Chelsea assembling so many young players with potential, is how espn have assembled so many old men without a clue.
Jackson is a player who could make a big leap forward this year at still only 23. He not only had 5 goals and 2 assists in the last 8 Premier League matches of last season but he looked like he was really starting to fully settle into the fast paced nature of the league. As much as people mock him, I think he’s low key one of the most all around skilled forwards in the entire league. His dribbling skills, close control, physicality, strength, running off the ball, combination play, movement into the channels, and tenacity are all excellent. He just needs to show more composure this year and he’ll definitely pass his 14 Premier League goals from last season.
I'm not sure of the merits of assessing him from playing teams that have played an entire season and are tiring.
@@Neverod8doreveNwhat a load of waffle m8…
Lets be honest mate, people still dog on Havertz and wrongly say Arsenal have to sign a forward bc he only got 13 goals in the league last season. (Granted he is clearly an off ball specialist whereas I don’t see Jackson in that regard)
At the end of the day other fans will and even alot of actual fans will not believe in a “forward” if they don’t bag 18+ goals consistently
An off ball specialist.. did you make that up? 😂
@@Neverod8doreveN So the last 8 matches of the Premier League each season don’t matter or count for anything? That’s 21% of the season.
as a united fan ..
i really like pedro neto... he is. good player.
Huge upgrade on Mudryk. He's the 3rd best winger in the league imo.
Their attack is looking extremely good. If they can get a half decent 9 then their attack is complete and that's the platform for them to build off.
What? 3rd best winger? Lmao bro need to stop playing fifa
Who are the first 2? 👀
@@cranberrydaddy8529 based on pure talent yes he is, last season he was building his consistency back up again and looked extremely good. The only negative of him is he's injury prone.
I don't pay attention to FIFA, I actually watch and analyse players properly.🤷🏽♂️
@@futurebs4 1. Salah 2.Saka
@@razaaahmad03that only negative is a HUGE negative tho lol
5:46 palmer ain't a rw in maresca's system cause he don't stay wide but he wouldn't know that would waffler
These are the very guys who slammed Chelsea for buying PALMER at €45m a bench player at city. Now they're praising PALMER
They not praising him they are saying that buying a left footed winger when you have a stack wing is just stupid.
@@brandonjablasone7544 wanz has trouble following😂
I laughed when Dan said Galagher better than our midfield? In what ? Running?
Chelsea bought Neto to weaken Wolves, one of their main mid-table rivals.
Battle of the mid
Arsenal fan right? Win champions league first, then we talk
Keep embarrassing yourself with your jealousy we keep spending soon we'll get it right railroading will be the norm soon
Osimhen+Murillo will make Chelsea unbeatable
😂😂😂
I don’t think ex footballers understand amortization. Nobody is gonna buy Murray for 70M, but we signed him on a 7 year deal costing us about 10 M a year, this will be his 3rd year he’s still under 23 years old on very low wages you can easily make your money back by selling for 40M
Yes, if you buy a player for 70m and amortize that costs over a period of 7 years (10m per season) only 40m will remain after three seasons. So you will be able to recoup your losses if you sell the player for 40m. How is that better than the competition though? If you buy a player for 70m and amortize the costs over a period of 5 years (14 m per season) only 28m will remain after three seasons and you will be able to sell that same 40m player with a 12m profit.
@@jornfalk9262 I don’t approve of this Chelsea strategy at all I think it is ridiculous but you have to take salary into account they give lower salary to the young players they are signing. If you sign a 24 years old and he didn’t perform well in 3 years he will be 27 on a very high salary which no other club will want to pay and take that risk on a 27 years old.
I understand amortization but it's nonsense because of how much they are doing it. It's a joke. Plastic club. Neto is so injury prone only circa 50 league appearances in the last 3 years.
@@jornfalk9262 what about the 30m you already paid over those 3 years how are going to recoup that 🤔
@@notfunnyx2exactly...its the same issue manUnited are dealing with right now.
It is absolutely insane how little football these guys actually watch/understand.
Thats what frank doesnt understand, chelsea doesnt need to sell the players that failed for the same fee or even a similar fee, if you bought a mudryk for 80 milion chelsea keeps it in the team for 1-2-3 years up untill they eventually give up on him, and then they put him on loan up until there is a team thats willing to buy mudryk or whomever other player it might be for the residual balance on the books they still have. If you fail you didnt lose money, but you still tried the most exciting young prospects on the market, and if you succeed you have great players to compete with.
Might not be the best plan but its a plan
Frank speaking straight facts!
This player Neto is a excellent player if it was Liverpool arsenal and man-city buy Neto why will all going crazy for them these pundits is Chelsea heater and this is no joke
If city bought him all you knobheads would be crying ffp. We know what's going on and so do city and their lawyers.
This channel caters for people who hate Chelsea, which is basically Liverpool and ManU fans. If Chelsea cured cancer these nobodies would run a story about Chelsea putting doctors out of work.
None of those have went for him though which says something no?
Bro you missing the point. Chelsea already 41 I repeat 41 first team players. Yea Neto would be a good player if they didn't have all the wingers they already have smh
Neto is actually one the few good signings of the Boehly & Eghbali era.
Bruh they could’ve deadass bought world class players
It’s not always about that though. Look at PSG. And you have to factor in fit and their salaries as well. And egos. They are building a team for longevity and dominance
@@lobmob3235 is that what paying 100 mil on wingers and then get new ones and bench that 100 mil player is. Seems like bad management to me
@@junioradult6219 not really if you have the resources. And if you’re referring to Mudryk he’s an investment (like most of their signings) and has the potential to be one of the best if everything falls into place. And if he doesn’t then tough luck but you have to take risks in order to win🤷♂️. Lot of fans/people are just salty their teams don’t have 1. The resources that Chelsea have and 2. Not as proactive. Better than just sitting there and doing nothing lol
Pundits criticized Roman Abramovich and his transfers; moaned about stacking the academy and not giving them a path to the first team. Boehly buys young players and brings them into the first team, pundits still groan. It's all about talking points for you guys, no matter what a club does.
all i will say is rewatch the espn video of all these pundits talking about palmer joining chelsea, these lot are clueless and do zero critical analysis if you watch that video you will know Neto will perform for chelsea and they will look further clueless yet again
He will perform....if hes fit
Neto is not average, he's an excellent signing if you can really afford the guy
These pundits are bullocks, they dont comprehend anything at all. Can someone tell me what exactly are they good at??? They are all smeared with jealousy, hate towards Chelsea. Steve, Don, Gab, Craig, perhaps Shaka... I'm tired of them talking trash against Chelsea and Manchester United. Give a benefit of a doubt to these clubs. Remember they're on serious transitions.
The question is do u actually think the signings are good ?? bse they are absolutely not
If Chelsea becomes successful let not these pundits begin praising Chelsea after all these critics
If this was Barca...Gab would be saying its idiocy and this has never been done before but with Chelsea it's interesting .... what a clown
Jesus christ that's all you Barca fan do? moan about everything when the segment has nothing to do with Barca
Yet, English club take a p*ss on ffp. I will wait till when epl start salary cap then we can discuss on how "broke" a club is 😂😂😂😂
Chelsea generate a lot of money. Barca lost Neymar and Messi bc of their idiocy
@@historianofmanythings4294 yes we don't sell well but that's simply because of the salary cap. Enjoy it while it lasts 😉
@historianofmanythings4294 this comment is peak idiocy... Neymar forced his way out and Messi deal renewal failed... and Chelsea doesn't generate as much income as Barca
As a Chelsea fan I dont understand the strategy yet, I dont think its about winning anymore, its just a business now, a new coach and different players every season, am lossing morale in football.
What is Frank talking even talking about? Selling Caicedo and Enzo should be the least of Chelsea’s concerns. That’s your starting midfield for the next 10 years
problem is u can put only 11 players on the pitch and u can have around 5-6 as reserves so what are the rest of the players doing if they are not even on the reserves?
ESPN really dislike the Chelsea owners 😅
looks like Enzo Maresca will play with 2-1-7 this season LOL
Gallagher is better than lavia? 😅
Yes
Gab, yes chelsea have many wingers but most of them not up to par. Sterling, mudryk, madueke
How us chelsea spen so much more than other clubs and not be breaking a single rule while doing so hmmmmmm 😅
Because Chelsea is also selling more players than other clubs. Not that you'll hear about that on this channel.
@@daleviker5884 no they are not they have highest net spend by far which includes ins and outs, almost double the second highest spenders
@@zephune9506 Because it is a complex calculation that involves amortization of future contracts, and takes into account wages etc. Obviously Chelsea know the numbers better than you do. Fans of other clubs (who could do the same thing) are just jealous that Chelsea has ambition while their clubs' owners just want to rake in the cash.
@@daleviker5884 amortised or not, they have to pay the fee by time the contract expires including all the wages. Buying on finance doesn’t mean you pay less.
Never enough.
Gab does not know what he’s talking bout balancing books big time, go over the signings the length of the contracts and the outgoings when you look at the actual net spend it’s barely over 100m not to mention you still have a bunch of players they will get good money for out going it isn’t a hard concept to grasp they have assets to sell. Chelsea always have Cobham to use for pure profit even if players turn out as busts they still have the best academy in the world for selling players as a back up
You're ignoring the transfers that are still being amortized from before. You can't on one hand say Neto's transfer will be amortized so no big deal and ignore you're still paying Lukakus transfer etc..
@@russellward4624 it’s not ignoring the fact people keep bringing this up like its a big surprise Chelsea has what no other clubs have an abundance of and that’s endless assets they can sell to balance the books. No other club in the prem is selling players like Chelsea is and for the amount of money the club is selling players for either lukaku is an anomaly look how many outgoings and money has come in the last two seasons Kai havertz mason mount and Gallagher alone are $165 million in profit. Two of them pure profit that’s from THREE players name 1 other club in the prem that’s done that
Jesus Chelsea just buy Watkins or Toney (or both) and call it a transfer window you need a striker.
Y'all are Chelsea haters. We see you. You never ever say anything positive about Chelsea. We're signing Osimhen soon and you'll be in more tears 😂😂😂😂😂
You can sign every striker in the market. Nobody is scared of Chelsea
When are “we signing Osimhen”? The season is almost starting, signing a forward was the priority even last season, but signed Jackson 2.0. The joke is not funny anymore.
I am a Chelsea supporter through and through, idk the first XI that is going to line up against City on August 18, rn I don’t know the recruitment system, scouting or the philosophy of how we going to play & tbh I am WORRIED 😢
Who will sell their experience players to you anyway. Buy Vini from Madrid? Or Musiala? You make your own winner. My only problem is the board buying too many players though the squad is bloated.
How is it you never hear Real Madrid not affording anyone?? Every other club has to sell/transfer players to afford to sign someone.
For the last 3 years, real has been getting players for free except Bellingham and Mbappe.
La liga tells clubs how much they can spend in the next window. They can't overspend as they wouldn't be able to register the player.
Excellent board management going back decades
If he stays fit, he’s such a great signing
Chelsea need a 2-3 year transfer ban.
Why?
@@sdm_za they’ve spent way to much money and have way to many players then they can account for.
You better ban them imo😂😂
Haaa u can ban yo team
The fact is they have a plan it sounds bizarre but at the end of the day performances will superceed everything.. fans will turn real soon
Why are people still talking about Todd Bohley as if he's still making the transfer deals?
So 5 years and Neto only played 135games for Wolverhampton
That’s Possible Chelsea line up is FIREEEEE.. only glaring miss is the striker.. Jackson is too inconsistent.. besides the keeper and Badi in defence they’d all comfortably play in the top 3 teams
Finally a smart signing for Chelsea, proven quality, however, the injury issues have to be a worry. I think it's the only reason there isn't a queue if clubs after him
“ they have so many player?”
It’s not your business.
Bro said you can’t tell me Lavia is better than Gallagher with a straight face 🫤
James won't play the first 3 games, Gusto and Tosin, to start. Nkunku to start ST & Palmer CAM, and Madueke starts at RW.
Why do you keep saying Mudryk was £85 mill
He wasn’t, and you know that. £68 mill, add ons of we win the league and CL, so never gonna happen any time soon.
Still ALOT od money regardless
@@georgemark8593he's a 20m player though, I doubt they'd get 20m from anyone today
Why did I even think ESPN would have pundits and casters with actual ball knowledge lmao what a joke of a cast.
Pedro plays on the left and right, Nicol you mupoet😅
If you don’t know or have no clue what is happening may be keep your mouth closed 😂
They’re stuck with Caicedo and Enzo.. but they’re both GREAT players.. that’s not an issue.
This guy said Gallagher is better that KDH and Lavia, bro please🤣
It'll be funny to hear their reactions in a few days time.
Chelsea is like me buying meme coins thinking I'm gonna score in one of them
At least you are aware of your delusuon. Chelsea, their management, fans and players, are all living in an alternate reality.