Top 10 Scientific Dinosaur Models of 2021 - PNSO, Safari LTD, Eofauna, and more!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 июл 2024
- Well, over a month into 2022 and I was finally able to put this video together. Find out which figures made the list in a year chalked full of incredible releases!
Top 5 Pop Culture Releases of 2021 here • Top 5 Pop Culture Insp...
Top 5 Mattel Releases of 2021 here • Top 5 Mattel Dinosaur ...
PNSO Olorotitan "Ivan" Review here • PNSO Olorotitan "Ivan"...
PNSO Tarbosaurus "Chuanzi" Review here • PNSO Tarbosaurus "Chua...
PNSO Parasaurolophus "Wyatt" Review here • PNSO Parasaurolophus "...
PNSO Carnotaurus "Domingo" Review here • PNSO Carnotaurus "Domi...
GR Toys Carcharodontosaurus Review here • GR Toys 2021 Carcharod...
GR Toys Dicraeosaurus Review here • GR Toys 2021 Dicraeosa...
Safari Ltd Daspletosaurus Review here • Safari Ltd 2021 Dasple...
Eofauna Triceratops "Cryptic" and "Dominant" Review here • Eofauna "Cryptic" & "D...
Eofauna Triceratops "Cryptic" and "Dominant" Unboxing here • They're Here! Eofauna ... 
Развлечения
Despite some of it’s flaws, PNSO has easily become my favorite scientific dinosaur model company. They check off on all the things I look for in a model line. The detail, accuracy, value and variety is great. Not cheap but I feel you get a bang for your buck and often the definitive version of a species. Also surprised to see you having the Livyatan ☺️
If there’s one prehistoric mammal I can honestly say I’m fascinated with, it’s Livyatan! I was so glad to see PNSO finally giving it its due but I do wish it had turned out a little better (looking at those seams!)
I really like this list! Great vid!
Great job as usual!
Good video! Im looking forward to the Eofauna diplodocus, i already preordered it in like November of last year. Canˋt wait. :) Besides that I‘m not sure yet.
Thanks for another great video!
I agree with most of your choices, especially with the 3-way tie between Biber/Rook, Doyle and Harvey - it really does feel like PNSO capitalises on the supposed "prestige" of the Museum line to charge more, which isn't really fair because look at #3 and #1, whose quality is honestly up there with the Museum line figures.
That being said though I must say I still love Biber, which I own, and am glad it's on the list anyway (:
Am personally hoping for Suchomimus and Kentrosaurus figures, we haven't really seen good scientific figures for these species yet...
Awesome video
I know you don’t collect the mammals that often but the new Rebor smilidon is a MASTERPIECE! I got the Ice Age version and it’s the best Smilodon. If you have any interest in the species I highly recommend it.
That Smilodon is amazing. By far the best one i have seen so far.
Does look like they did a good job with that figure but I’m holding out for their chonkin rex 😉
Amazing video
Finally a memenchisaurus with Good not shrink wrap face ❤️
To be completely frank, PNSO should take every single spot of any top scientific model list. There is simply nothing from any of the other companies on PNSO's level in terms of accuracy, naturalistic sculpting, and just sheer quality of paint.
Doyle the Triceratops' jaw is not a flaw. That's how the latest research suggests ceratopsian jaws looked.
Could you tell me where do I find that research on ceratopsian jaws?
Yeah but he gotta make the list interesting. He often admits that pnso can always take all the spots
Besides those two EoFauna Triceratops, I have my eye on a few PNSO figures.
Cool!!!
7:50 Best Tricertops ever ❤️
Pnso is better
Its a bit bad that the Dino Hazard Irritator just costs 270$
Hm, I’m not quite sure where you’re located, or what currency you’re referring to but Everything Dinosaur currently has the Irritator in stock for about 53 USD before shipping!
@@Killershrewfan On this Dans Dinosaurs it says 259.99 $ which is really much but I live in Europe so idk if it's cz shipping or something
The PNSO Iguanodon isn’t actually inaccurate, the skull is just based on an individual with a more slender head than usual as shown in one of their ‘making of’ videos. So the Mantellisaurus thing isn’t exactly true.
Do you know the name of the specimen? I wanna check it out
I wanna get both Sinoceratops and Pentaceratops from the BOTM line next week
Two great options!
@@Killershrewfan unfortunately I only get one next week, Sinoceratops and that’s it. No more collecting
@@kevinobill4818you can keep going if it makes you happy
hi andy i like the tarbosaurus alot and i just got it and i like the paint job on it too . i dont like the paint with stripes and hard edges or dinosaurs paint job that looks like a nascar . next they will want to put bill boards on them , lol dinosaurs like that look stupid ! .give me a good old harryhaussen paint job every time
For me it's the collectA xiphactinus
12:07 based
This figure is really underrated but after looking up of some Alligator photos some being fat others having a hunched back chuanzi feels really good
Not as a general reconstruction but...as chuanzi...it really represents one individual not every tarbosaurus has the same amount of fat and they got their differences in the head after all tyrannosaurids especially trex are well known for their extreme individual variation and tarbosaurus is closer related to trex than anything else
What about PNS0 Tyrannosaurus rex Wilson
PNSO is the goat company. I bought them out for my daughter’s birthday, I’m so upset just knowing how much she’s gonna abuse these
Can someone explain how people can be excited about these safari figures compared to the higher end PNSO models (or Rebor, Namnu or BotM?) They look hideous in comparison, with really crappy paint jobs and low, simple detail designs. Like cheap kid toys. I've seen it on multiple channels, "beautiful Safari [dinosaur X] figure" and it always looks absolutely terrible. I just don't get it, am I missing something? Is this a nostalgia thing or something?
It’s about taking them for what they are. It’s true that compared to the likes of PNSO and the other companies you mentioned, Safari’s offerings do feel simplistic and childlike. That being said, out of all those companies, Safari puts the greatest emphasis on education, and do market themselves as being made for kids. As you can imagine, this means they put accuracy and affordability first, so the fact that you can buy (depending) several meticulously researched Safari figures for the same price as one PNSO, Nanmu, or REBOR offering doesn’t hurt. They might not be as intricately sculpted or painted but they are made for a different niche of the market and price bracket, so comparing them in black and white terms like “which figure is better sculpted and painted” can be a bit unfair. When I make reviews or top ten videos like this, I like to consider intention above all else. I won’t judge a Nanmu figure for being scientifically inaccurate when it’s clearly not trying to be. When it comes to safari, the question isn’t “is this the most realistic figure ever?”, it’s “did they uphold their commitment to accuracy, and is it a nice figure for (usually) less than twenty bucks?” And the answer is usually a resounding YES!
@@Killershrewfan Thanks for the explanation :) makes sense now
Amen! I see this in the comments section on every PNSO review, someone who enjoys the Safari version better. I just can’t see how, PNSO is hands down the best model maker on the market.
@@JohnSmith13146safari deserves to be celebrated for bringing accurate and affordable models to kids. That's why they're on here.
That's being said, of anyone genuinely prefers safaris offerings to pnso than they're out of their mind 💀
@@starbirds2464 agree 100% I’m not trashing Safari for their low purchase price (and subsequent low quality), just saying they aren’t even remotely in the same ballpark as PNSO, so it baffles me how serious collectors can put them in the same arena and say Safari is better.
քʀօʍօֆʍ ?
the only good thing about the PNSO Tarbo is the head imo.
Well if people think that animals dont have individual differences, are just skin over bone and are copy pastes and the so different in shape trex skulls are not enough for them to prove it then no wonder why it gets so much hate
The head is the worst part imo. It looks derpy and doesn't represent the beautiful animal as say prehistoric planet does. The body is fine animals often look a lil chunky