Richard Dawkins & Deepak Chopra (Sub) | El Encuentro del Siglo | CDI 2013 Dangerous Ideas

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 7 тыс.

  • @Ericsahi
    @Ericsahi 3 года назад +489

    “Sometimes I start a sentence and I don’t even know where it’s going to end up”
    -Michael Scott
    - Deepak Chopra

  • @ani4787
    @ani4787 3 года назад +300

    1:02:59 “A good metaphor is one that clarifies and does not obscure” - what priceless words 👏🏼

    • @eminkuliev2466
      @eminkuliev2466 Год назад +3

      Not necessarily, not necessarily. A good metaphor may take you out of the intellect and to a different realm, realm of feelings and ... .. more

    • @abelochoa584
      @abelochoa584 Год назад +4

      Dawkins´ definition of a metaphor is only words. Chopra beat him from beginning to end. What Dawkins called jargon was backed by those many scientists Chopra named: Nobel Prize winner Roger Penrose, Lawrence Krauss and other world famous physicists.

    • @JakeEssex
      @JakeEssex Год назад

      @@abelochoa584 shut up, talking nonsense 🤣🤣🤣 my guys tryna say atoms are conscious, and you agree👀🤣🤣 embarrassing

    • @d3rduck
      @d3rduck Год назад +1

      FOR YOU SIR

    • @normanthrelfall2646
      @normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

      Good News but not common knowledge
      Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life.
      Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God!
      The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart.
      The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions.
      In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.

  • @josephengel8263
    @josephengel8263 4 года назад +961

    I started using the words “consciousness”, “universe”, “quantum” more frequently and now I have a bunch of potheads following me around and calling me “guru”. When do I get my diamond encrusted glasses?

    • @stfu_rito
      @stfu_rito 4 года назад +15

      they are actually rhinestones

    • @nicolasyacar7181
      @nicolasyacar7181 4 года назад +9

      He believes in pantheism but he’s just to stupid to recognize it, and you know, he makes a few bucks out of his stupidity. Which is even more stupid. He will rationalize all his life. He deeply may have good intentions tho.

    • @Rigvedification
      @Rigvedification 4 года назад +15

      @Robert atom has consciousness only when one smokes the woo woo weed

    • @Shahid-mh8cj
      @Shahid-mh8cj 4 года назад +2

      @@Rigvedification i see you're a fellow who loves James Randi 🍻

    • @Rigvedification
      @Rigvedification 4 года назад +4

      @@Shahid-mh8cj I do admire him for exposing spooky nonsense 🎊

  • @KXSocialChannel
    @KXSocialChannel 2 года назад +55

    I've never heard so many words spoken with such authority but with absolutely no meaning or truth behind them. Well done for developing such a skill, Deepak.

  • @pablof6257
    @pablof6257 4 года назад +251

    42:20 Dawkins: "I shall not make an argument ad hominem. My argument is ad bullshitem." Priceless.

    • @ME-od8id
      @ME-od8id 2 года назад +10

      I know, yet his 'blood pressure' according to the snake oil salesman was needing to come down.

    • @Jessiejam-44
      @Jessiejam-44 2 года назад +11

      I think Chopra likes to hear Himself talk.

    • @hoenircanute
      @hoenircanute 2 года назад +1

      @@Jessiejam-44 Every word he utters is to form the audience, picking up on the slightest thing and forming his argument as it goes on.. Like George Galloway and all other DEmagogues, Alex Jones for that matter.. demagogues..

    • @gabrielalvarez5194
      @gabrielalvarez5194 2 года назад

      “Ad Ridiculum” fallacy demonstration

    • @SanSha2100
      @SanSha2100 2 года назад +1

      ad bullshitem, actually proves that, Dawkin was using ad hominem fallacy of science 101 yet again, and your liking it proves your love for abusing opponent because you know you cannot defeat him.

  • @leftrightandcenternewslike5571
    @leftrightandcenternewslike5571 4 года назад +234

    Dawkins expressions are priceless when Deepak talks...
    Laughing my head off...

    • @realhumanbean7915
      @realhumanbean7915 2 года назад +4

      @Nisha chambiyal
      *BREAKING NEWS: PERSON DISCOVERS EMOTIONS AND SUBJECTIVITY*

    • @normanthrelfall2646
      @normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

      Good News but not common knowledge
      Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life.
      Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God!
      The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart.
      The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions.
      In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.

    • @phoenixj1299
      @phoenixj1299 9 месяцев назад

      Nothing is as laughable as Christianity

    • @davidbanner6230
      @davidbanner6230 4 месяца назад +1

      On August 2, 1776, sixteen American colonies declared themselves independent of British colonial Government. We can but wonder of what kind of a world we would be living in today, if this seemingly uneventful event, had not taken place? Would we today be using German, or Russian, as our native language? Would we have television, air travel, internet, international communications, and the levels of democracy we now enjoy, and so many other freedoms we now take for granted? America grew from that precarious beginning into the world power we know to which, had it never existed would not have been there to counter-balance the brutal rogue giant regimes that were to emerge in the following hundred or so years ahead…? The question is….was it just a coincidence, that the rise and development of the US, was just a coincidence at the right time, in the right place, of the right power, to protect the fragile idea of democratic freedom, when it was desperately needed? Or was it a preordained awareness of the evilness that was about to be inflicted upon a still - quite primitive - world…?
      Although some Atheists will sneer at the possibility of there being more to existence than just evolution, and we can never think beyond doubt that it may have been more than coincidence, we are left with such as ‘why did the Japs bomb Pearl Harber, when the carriers were not there? ‘Why did Hitler make the biggest mistake ever of declaring war on the US?
      So many things to ponder….

  • @Marius-vw9hp
    @Marius-vw9hp 7 лет назад +436

    "Chopras hair has awareness and the ability to curl itself" - Freeman Dyson.

    • @TicoAcosta
      @TicoAcosta 5 лет назад +13

      Hahahahahaha!

    • @donkaler213
      @donkaler213 4 года назад +26

      i don’t think he said that he should sue you

    • @rafaelgonzalezj
      @rafaelgonzalezj 4 года назад +4

      @@donkaler213 welcome to Internet!

    • @donkaler213
      @donkaler213 4 года назад +11

      @@rafaelgonzalezj u clearly didn't watch the video then😂

    • @PittsburghSonido
      @PittsburghSonido 4 года назад +4

      Rafael González
      Bro that’s what Dawkins said in this debate. Donkaler is joking.

  • @e047-k2e
    @e047-k2e 2 года назад +116

    Each word Prof Dawkins says is so well thought out. Not a word wasted.

    • @confidential303
      @confidential303 Год назад +6

      That is because you are not capable enough to understand the higher materials. If I talk to a little kid do you like 1 ice cream or 2 ice creams, they understand that but If I am talking about How to add up Balance sheet of corporate organizations they blank out.

    • @charlescole645
      @charlescole645 Год назад

      It's ironic that the people who believe in mystical and magical things are more like the kid who enjoy and cares about ice cream while the actual scientists know how to "add up balance sheet of corporate organizations".@@confidential303

    • @normanthrelfall2646
      @normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

      A lovely sight every morning
      Every day I see a lovely sight: little girls and boys with their hats and coats on, holding mum’s hand and thus trusting them for guidance on the way to school. They also trust teachers for their education; that they are being taught Facts in each subject. These little children deserve to be taught the truth and not be indoctrinated with Darwinian Evolution. I have studied evolution for many years in the various fields of science, and you can trust me; that there is no credible evidence for the theory. I keep up to date with all the major developments. It is a bottomless pit; full of hidden assumptions which the general public are not privy too. Evolution is a library of theories trying to rescue the main theory continually; without much success may I add.
      Educating these young lives with this fundamental extremism will lead them down a path of self- destruction; into an immoral lifestyle. The truth is evolution is a Faith; not part of science. It is committing academic murder to teach that evolution is a Fact of science. It is robbing them of GOD-CONSCIOUSNESS. That is searing their conscience with a hot-iron to the reality of what is truly right and what is wrong. At best, evolution is a religious faith and should be treated as such in schools in relation to religious education. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth I trust not?

    • @RohanRajadhyaksha
      @RohanRajadhyaksha Год назад +1

      Indeed. Deepak, on the other hand, dishes out an incoherent word salad and resorts to ad hominem attacks when he runs out of remotely coherent things to say. What a charlatan!!

    • @normanthrelfall2646
      @normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

      I have no respect for him because he disregards, ignores and suppresses evidences against evolution that call it into question.
      Genesis chapters 1- 11 is recorded in Chinese pictographs which are silent witnesses of events, these are rather like fingerprints of historical facts that took place, being historical in character not forgeries. Evolutionists believe everything is a forgery if it calls evolution into question, we must not go against this world religion of Darwinian Origins for it is a sacred cow. We must ignore, suppress and disregard any evidence that calls evolution into question. The pictographic clues to our ancient past have remained in hidden view for thousands of years. There is evidence of antiquity which is undeniable, but evolutionists will always remain arrogant and defiant to the reality of this evidence. The question is: Where did the Chinese picture concepts come from? Concepts that are memorialized in ancient Chinese pictographs and why do these figures match the Genesis account. Many Chinese people who were former communists have recognized the historical account in Genesis in their pictographic ancient language and have turned to Christ for salvation, knowing that their for bearers had knowledge of their migration from the Tower of Babel. These are just three pictographs as examples and there are others for those who want to do their own research. Noah’s Flood is mentioned in pictographic evidence particularly where the symbol for eight is concerned, because eight persons entered the Ark. It doesn’t matter what evidence points towards Creation, fall, Flood and redemption through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, evolutionists as goats will still head-butt the evidence, such as andesite stones carved with dinosaurs on them found in Nazca tombs in the desert with patina on them which takes thousands of years to form, speaking of antiquity. Dr Dennis Swift through this evidence he discovered doing excavations, turned him 360 degrees from an evolutionist to a creationist. Dinosaur figurines which are quite numerous in Mexico were studied by Dr Don Patton and were found to be genuine. See you-tube. The evidence is clear that the indigenous Indians lived alongside dinosaurs a few thousand years ago. They did not die out 65 million years ago, this is purely a religious concept.
      The Turin Shroud depicting Jesus crucified was produced, when the fire of God’s presence raised him from the dead, leaving a negative impression on the shroud which scientists have tried to reproduce, in order to prove it a forgery. When the Lord’s body was exposed to God’s light, just like film being exposed in a camera to light, it produced a negative. In all these things God has not left us without his divine witness of events.

  • @danieldelanoche2015
    @danieldelanoche2015 5 лет назад +451

    Deepak: May I ask you a question?
    Dawkins: Yes
    Deepak: *proceeds to ask 27 questions in a row*

    • @travispratt6327
      @travispratt6327 4 года назад +2

      Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Well Yea cause there’s nothing wrong with deepak doing that, he can ask as many questions as he wants as long as it’s all the same point he’s getting at. It’s only if he brought up multiple unrelated points that it’d be considered a gish gallop.

    • @travispratt6327
      @travispratt6327 4 года назад

      Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Oh, whats the meme?

    • @caballeromatias1992
      @caballeromatias1992 3 года назад

      and even so he does not understand why the one who reddens with shame is in the MATRIX

    • @2fast2block
      @2fast2block 3 года назад

      Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
      Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
      We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

    • @PROSCOPEGaming
      @PROSCOPEGaming 2 года назад

      @Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Whats the meme? Tell us

  • @blacksheep5183
    @blacksheep5183 5 лет назад +329

    That thing at the start made me check if I clicked on the right video.

    • @jadenhalstead7290
      @jadenhalstead7290 4 года назад +42

      I thought I was the only who saw that. What the fuck was that doing right before a debate about God?

    • @NikhilMathew122333
      @NikhilMathew122333 4 года назад +4

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @carolthomas8528
      @carolthomas8528 4 года назад +6

      Black Sheep - The whole idea was to whip the crowd into a frenzy - rather like a charismatic preacher - all hot air .

    • @desarguesbaptiste5577
      @desarguesbaptiste5577 4 года назад +8

      I thought that was quite funny but didn't understant either ^^

    • @UKFX
      @UKFX 4 года назад +9

      That dude dangling down slowly looked like he had no clue what he was doing lolol.

  • @charlesrump5771
    @charlesrump5771 5 лет назад +505

    Deepak demonstrates the Theory of Devolution.

    • @jadenhalstead7290
      @jadenhalstead7290 4 года назад +32

      I think he is a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect

    • @isaacleillhikar4566
      @isaacleillhikar4566 4 года назад +1

      Marc Driscoll was reading a quote about how people have their feelings hurt and complain about anything by Spurgeon. And says. "That's B.B before blogging. Totally different epoch in human devolution."

    • @bullymaguire2061
      @bullymaguire2061 4 года назад +10

      It boggles the mind... How can a mind like his have survived for so long lol...

    • @vishakhatripathi9608
      @vishakhatripathi9608 4 года назад +6

      dawkins was talking facts, but chopra was talking ideas--don`t compare the two

    • @trankt54155
      @trankt54155 3 года назад +3

      @@bullymaguire2061 The answer is,.....money.

  • @sergiomerino1434
    @sergiomerino1434 3 года назад +59

    31:28
    When Richard inhaled and puffed the oxygen right out as a reaction from hearing the complete stupidity of Deepak was hilarious 😂 I understand Deepak is in a debate but pulling shit out your ass like that is worse than admitting your opponent is right.

    • @MrSkme
      @MrSkme 2 года назад +6

      Admitting your opponent right is a great thing. It means that you learnt something and it is something that requires great courage to do. Sheeple think that you lose when you admit your opponent is right but it is actually only then you win as the only way to truly win is to aquire new knowledge.

  • @devJ002
    @devJ002 3 года назад +187

    I need Deepak Chopra's confidence when he talks about random shit that he doesn't have a clue on.

    • @dumont-art3971
      @dumont-art3971 Год назад +11

      What I can tell you is that all that D.Chopra says is in keeping with Kant and Plato and most certainly all of the Vedas, particularly Vedanta. It is a true expression of Non-duality of the wisdom traditions This, in turn, is in keepig with both quantum physics and metaphysics. Mr. Chopra is speaking of ontology and epistemology. Mr. Dawkins has restricted himself to empirical materialism, only. Much kindness.

    • @S_Bellew
      @S_Bellew Год назад +4

      @@dumont-art3971 - Plato had been proven wrong on virtually everything what he said. He was big in the past, but he's mostly irrelevant in the modern day. Neither you, nor Chopra have any idea what "quantum leap" means. Also, there's no such a thing s "quantum shift".

    • @dumont-art3971
      @dumont-art3971 Год назад +1

      @@S_Bellew @Vadim Ivanchenko Dear me. If you can explain me any of what Plato was talking about, perhaps we could go further with the conversation. In general we are talking about epistemology and ontology Vadim. Who, if you don't mind me asking, would you or forward as an exemplar of superior understanding of metaphysics - Immanuel Kant? Hegel? Deepak Chopra is putting forward understandings which are in keeping with these peoples discussions.

    • @dumont-art3971
      @dumont-art3971 Год назад

      @@S_Bellew Metaphysics does not become 'irrelevant' Vadim. The reason for this is that if is an explanation of the 'timeless'. It is knowledge of true Being, true Knowing. It is experience of the Eternally True. This does not, we might, very humbly say, change with time. Rather, is it not so, the 'ever-changing' goes on ad infinitum. This, in the ancient traditions, is known as Mara, maya or prakrti. We might also call it 'flux'.

    • @dumont-art3971
      @dumont-art3971 Год назад +1

      @@S_Bellew Plato, for example, was talking about the 'figures on the wall of a cave', saying that all most of us see, are the dancing shadows as the fire lights up the figures. To really see truth, or Reason, we need to Go Beyond the illusion. How do we do this? According to Kant, Schopenhauer and Deepak Chopra, we must transcend the mundane. How do we do this? This is the domain of metaphysics. As stated, Mr.Dawkins is keeping to 'nice little, safe,' empirical-reductionist ' science'. I mean no ill will to Mr. Dawkins or to yourself, however, I must highlight that towering majesty of metaphysics over 'sense-based' reductive techniques.

  • @Dimera09
    @Dimera09 8 лет назад +285

    wtf is this shit at the beginning hahaha

    • @no22sill
      @no22sill 6 лет назад +2

      Lol

    • @rakeshkumarjha7252
      @rakeshkumarjha7252 6 лет назад +6

      That is at least better than the Rotten-Deepak-Talk

    • @totty2524
      @totty2524 6 лет назад +6

      This beggining is so overly-epic and dramatic, it's hilarious, I love it.

    • @venkatnz1229
      @venkatnz1229 5 лет назад

      science says it does not believe in god but it uses Infinity quite often to prove the theories.
      what is infinity if not god.

    • @totty2524
      @totty2524 5 лет назад +6

      @@venkatnz1229 Not god.

  • @beeguy300
    @beeguy300 3 года назад +438

    When Chopra speaks, I get the illusion that I understand what he is saying. When Dawkins speaks, I know that I understand what he is saying.

    • @Jessiejam-44
      @Jessiejam-44 2 года назад +24

      Chopra likes to hear Himself talk.

    • @kimbirch1202
      @kimbirch1202 2 года назад +12

      It is easy to say what folk already believe, but that doesn't mean those beliefs are correct.
      It is harder, but more profitable to challenge existing beliefs

    • @westonkienel4733
      @westonkienel4733 2 года назад

      @@Jessiejam-44 LoLkkjltaaly l 0alalaLLHLJKK0

    • @lieblingmike
      @lieblingmike 2 года назад +2

      The very definition of casuistry .

    • @dumont-art3971
      @dumont-art3971 2 года назад +1

      That his, I say with kindness, because he speaks in the most base form. hHe speaks of the very averages of human experience. He speaks nothing of Knowledge or Gnosis.

  • @grkr8942
    @grkr8942 3 года назад +54

    I nominate Richard Dawkins for a sainthood!

  • @Sanjiban5
    @Sanjiban5 6 лет назад +803

    Deepak thinks "If you can't convince a person, confuse him"

    • @nairobi1519
      @nairobi1519 4 года назад +33

      Confuse with heavy words and scientific terms

    • @danaignat8790
      @danaignat8790 4 года назад +8

      exactly... pure gibberish!!!!!!

    • @lukpo1997
      @lukpo1997 4 года назад +7

      Are you Shure that is not just a part of the people that don't understand what is he saying? Does for exple the term "ego death" or "cosmic counsciousness" means something for you? If you ever had a transcendental experience, you will understand (and I'm not saying this implies a metafisical reality)

    • @buboclan
      @buboclan 4 года назад +5

      Gargon - A ridiculous word from the ideology of Jubril that was formed by mistakenly saying it instead of jargon. It has now evolved to mean a mixture of Garbage and Jargon

    • @johnlawrence2757
      @johnlawrence2757 4 года назад +1

      @Sanjiban Bairagya Not difficult in your case

  • @scienceofreality
    @scienceofreality 6 лет назад +420

    Respect for Dawkins for being patient...

    • @ammarsiddiqui3602
      @ammarsiddiqui3602 5 лет назад +4

      much respect

    • @r4h4al
      @r4h4al 4 года назад +4

      They were both patient.

    • @HAL-iv2kd
      @HAL-iv2kd 4 года назад +12

      @@r4h4al Chopra wasn't, because Dawkins at least knows how to make a point.

    • @badtuber1654
      @badtuber1654 3 года назад

      Dawkins is several lvls bellow Deepak inteligence, and the fact he does not respect the amazing Deepaks insights, drops him a few lvls more, or maybe he is doing his part on purpose for the debate. Dawkins logic -> "you have spoken "Word Salad Jargon" ,"ad bullshitem" . I have proven your argument wrong. " Then he claims to be all Scientific . LOL

    • @polaristrans
      @polaristrans 3 года назад +19

      @@badtuber1654 "Dawkins is several lvls bellow Deepak inteligence" LOL

  • @fihimafihi
    @fihimafihi 4 года назад +40

    Every time Deepak speaks universe sneaks behind the couch in the lounge and begs mercy!

  • @Matstarx25
    @Matstarx25 3 года назад +43

    Richard: My name is Richard Dawkins.
    Host: WOW! POR FAVOR un applauso.

    • @enekaitzteixeira7010
      @enekaitzteixeira7010 Год назад

      YA VES. Era híper exasperante.
      Por Dios, hasta ha pedido un aplauso cuando el charlatán de Chopra dijo que los átomos tenían imaginación... flipante.

    • @souviksarkar.7219
      @souviksarkar.7219 Год назад +1

      You reminded me of Juan Cervantes

  • @jerrysky4598
    @jerrysky4598 3 года назад +82

    The takeaway I got from this is just because science hasn't answered all the mysteries of the universe, doesn't give another faction the right to interject their particular guesses and call it a day.

    • @roscius6204
      @roscius6204 2 года назад +12

      you need to watch more theological debates, pretty much that every time.

    • @lazylenni1017
      @lazylenni1017 2 года назад +10

      Sums it up pretty accurately.

  • @antonioclaros156
    @antonioclaros156 3 года назад +133

    Richard Dawkins: We as scientist try to explain difficult things in a simple way so people understand , we do not us complicated jargon in order to confuse people.
    Deepak Chopra: I like to move it move it, I like to !move it!!

    • @chrisbennett6260
      @chrisbennett6260 Год назад

      thats a gross exaggeration
      you came in with as usual your prejudices that your very statement reflects
      and i am neither in one camp or the other

    • @Itsnickcherry
      @Itsnickcherry Год назад +8

      @@chrisbennett6260 lol nah he was pretty accurate

    • @normanthrelfall2646
      @normanthrelfall2646 Год назад

      Good News but not common knowledge
      Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life.
      Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God!
      The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart.
      The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions.
      In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.

    • @juanmacaballero33
      @juanmacaballero33 11 месяцев назад +1

      Jajajajaj fantasia no !!! No pudiste escuchar por tus prejuicios !! Pero en todo el debate se noto la superioridad (en términos de consciencia) a favor de chopra !!!
      Me gustaria que debatimos al respecto !! Te parece ??? Es una pena que la mayoria de comentarios estén a favor de una ser completamente conectado solamente con su hemisferio izquiero, que parece mas una maquina que un ser humano
      Me gustaría saber que opina acerca del amor ? O la felicidad ?? Porque no debe tener ni puta idea. Como todos los que los siguen...
      Solo te sugiero una cosa: Investiga en profundidad a Einstein (uno de los mejores científicos de la humanidad) cuando le preguntaban sobre la existencia de dios, él siempre respondía que creía en el Dios de spinoza. lo que habla el científico spinoza es lo mismo que explica Chopra sobre la conciencia !!
      te invito a que lo investigues y lo escuches sin prejuicios en la mente porque eso te nubla tu receptividad.
      Y no solamente a Einstein y spinoza. !!! Investiga enseñanzas de Sócrates, buda y millones de científicos orientales !! Como nikola tesla hablan de la conciencia Investiga y Estos tipos son muchos mas que este chico Dawkins

    • @juanchymartin7824
      @juanchymartin7824 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@juanmacaballero33Spinozq no era cientifico. Su Dios es la monada. La naturaleza misma en donde todos. Spinoza es el padre de gran parte del materialismo ya que dice que no me pertenece mi cuerpo sino que yo soy mi cuerpo.
      Ademas nosotros no podemos modificar la realidad con la mente ni esta es un completo fenomeno, porque sino por medio de voluntad podriamos cambiar dicha situacion de forma inmediata dicho elemento, critica ya hecha por Frege hace mucho. Dawkins tiene una de las teorias mas interesantes con los memes, despreciar a alguien de esa manera es ridiculo.
      Algo mas que lo diga Einstein no significa que sea verdad y a si vez el ayurveda sobrevive sobre bases hinduistas que no se encuentran en Spinoza como quedo ya claro.

  • @downswingplayer9712
    @downswingplayer9712 5 лет назад +167

    It starts at 11:40

  • @kevinsysyn4487
    @kevinsysyn4487 2 года назад +14

    I used to work with head/brain injured people, accident victims, embolism stroke... etc. I can tell you when you interrupt the chemicals in the brain consciousness is affected in every way. I've never seen an exception to this. So while I can't explain how chemicals produce consciousness I can tell you that.

  • @nullifidian13
    @nullifidian13 5 лет назад +486

    I physically feel the pain of Dawkins in this debate.

    • @acpliego
      @acpliego 3 года назад +26

      I really don’t know how he accepted this.

    • @nullifidian13
      @nullifidian13 3 года назад +30

      @@acpliego mate everyone physically cringes when Deepak is involved... watch some other interviews/debates... he's such a scam artist

    • @codewalters
      @codewalters 3 года назад +12

      Seriously it was torture for him.

    • @peterbarker8249
      @peterbarker8249 3 года назад

      Q)⁸88⁸@@acpliego

    • @The_IND_Miyota
      @The_IND_Miyota 3 года назад +8

      Truly Dude

  • @TheTrumpBoy
    @TheTrumpBoy 6 лет назад +322

    That was a horrendous format for a debate moderated by a loud blockhead!

    • @nicolasvasquez7062
      @nicolasvasquez7062 4 года назад +13

      That wasn't a debate

    • @tommydawson7147
      @tommydawson7147 4 года назад +8

      He wasnt that annoying, the Format was bullshit, give them 10 or 15 minutes to explain

    • @shamanicrevolution2204
      @shamanicrevolution2204 3 года назад +5

      Literally. 90 seconds wtf.

    • @thomasshrum4006
      @thomasshrum4006 3 года назад +9

      @@shamanicrevolution2204 Lucky for Dawkins it doesn't take more than 90 seconds to point out bullshit.

    • @guichec3786
      @guichec3786 3 года назад +1

      a serious debate and chopra is an oxymoron

  • @ricardocalderon1721
    @ricardocalderon1721 6 лет назад +35

    Richard Dawkins thank you so much for your clear and wise comments.

  • @drvanhelsingz5133
    @drvanhelsingz5133 2 года назад +70

    Dawkins is an excellent and honest intellectual who truly respects his audience.

    • @jameswoodhouse1843
      @jameswoodhouse1843 2 года назад +6

      I find him rather arrogant

    • @riaklungmoita4923
      @riaklungmoita4923 2 года назад +6

      Dawkins cannot answer questions from his opponent..

    • @drvanhelsingz5133
      @drvanhelsingz5133 2 года назад +2

      @@riaklungmoita4923 bc they’re not intelligible. Sensible questions.

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve Год назад

      @@riaklungmoita4923 You misspelled his name. It's C-H-O-P-R-A. Just a friendly FYI.

    • @abelochoa584
      @abelochoa584 Год назад +4

      Dawkings can be called an intellectual, but never an honest person. His rampant atheism has engulfed his honesty. He lost the debate from the first to the last word. He's not an honest person.

  • @lincolnsixecho1947
    @lincolnsixecho1947 6 лет назад +191

    I loved when doctor Dawkins said "I shall not make an argument ad hominem. My argument is ad bullshitem".

    • @andrewconnell3653
      @andrewconnell3653 5 лет назад +4

      At minute 42

    • @Nokapp23
      @Nokapp23 4 года назад

      No. See www.quora.com/Are-atoms-sentient. And there are others too

    • @briansmith3791
      @briansmith3791 4 года назад +5

      @LincolnSixEcho: Dawkins exhibiting his usual arrogance. People with deep belief systems simply cannot comprehend someone who disagrees with them. They think they're either liars or morons. I've had painful experience of this. About 16 years ago, i visited a long-time friend. An atheist, whom i had respected as a mentor for 25 years. During our conversation, i mentioned scientists had recently discovered something called 'Dark Matter' and i told him what i had read in New Scientist about it. He made a 'sour' face. When i laughingly asked him "why the look, do you think i'm telling lies?" he said "yes." I left his home that day and have not spoken to him since. A good man threw his closest friend in the bin with one word, because he refused to accept facts that he thought would affect his materialist beliefs. Dawkins falsely called Chopra a liar, said an eminent physicist was wrong without evidence, even called the audience liars, for the same reason my ex-friend called me a liar.

    • @shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867
      @shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867 3 года назад +5

      @@briansmith3791 This is the problem with Hinduism the caste system is ingrained in its identity. Just like deepak kept trying to use argumentum ad verecundiam or appeal to authority fallacy a number of times in his arguments the basic sadhu/guru/pandit does the same the only difference is deepak is trying to keep Hinduism relevant to educated Indians while the sadhu/guru/pandit scams the uneducated Indian masses. The similarity is that both want to keep people ignorant by filling their minds and time with spiritual and metaphysical bullshit. It is to conform with hindu society and appear knowledgeable with in any group even if your the most ignorant person their is. Abrahamic religions have one cult. In hinduism every brahmin or pseudointellectual can create confusion and his very own cult.
      The scientists who do not pay attention to religion like Carl Sagan and Neil Degrasse Tyson. Who don't want people to remain ignorant due to their religious believes try to reach as large an audience as possible. They know the evils of Christianity and Islam. They do not know the disease of spreading any and all ignorant beliefs in Hinduism. It can be rewritten to fool anybody.
      Hinduism is like liquid poison. you put in a bottle it will become the bottle. you put it in a glass it will become a glass. changing it shape does not make it any less poisonous.

    • @natanaellizama6559
      @natanaellizama6559 3 года назад +3

      @@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867
      I don't think so. Deepak made appeals to authority not in a fallacious way at all. He did not state "X said so therefore Y is true". He's appealing to authority because Dawkins stated that he was stating incomprehensible word salads, while he was stating views by prominent scientists, so even if he were wrong in his belief it would not be a bullshit belief. If you want fallacies speak of Dawkins who DID make ad hominems.

  • @yoursbadal
    @yoursbadal 4 года назад +578

    Title should be "Torturing Dawkins straight for one hour."

    • @PittsburghSonido
      @PittsburghSonido 4 года назад +24

      Seriously...
      Not only was Chopra insufferable, but the way this debate was situated ended up a total disaster. Takes 13 minutes for the opening question and it was such a boring question to boot.
      This was a meandering debate. One that I don't always like watching unless I have watched all of Dawkins's other debates on RUclips. lol

    • @souravsahoo1582
      @souravsahoo1582 4 года назад +13

      Dawkins is good but..not any best scientist..he is narrow minded

    • @sibadityapal1493
      @sibadityapal1493 4 года назад +16

      @@souravsahoo1582 Oh really? And will please elucidate on your judgment of Dr. Richard Dawkins, Professor at University of Oxford. Do also state your credentials in all their magnificence, because you must be very well-qualified and erudite to be offering a critique of Dr. Dawkins in a single sentence through the medium of an obscure RUclips comments section.

    • @souravsahoo1582
      @souravsahoo1582 4 года назад +7

      @@sibadityapal1493 he is not open minded..these people have a serious problem in accepting spiritual concept..deepak Chopra's words make sense..but dr. Dawkins is not open minded

    • @indomins_rexx7209
      @indomins_rexx7209 4 года назад +33

      @@souravsahoo1582 yep, every individual word makes sense, but when u combine them, they dont😂😂

  • @jabibgalt5551
    @jabibgalt5551 5 лет назад +285

    Deepak: How many people understood what I was saying?
    [Crowds applauds]
    Dawkins: You're lying!
    That was sweet.

    • @franciscomirandahernandez7510
      @franciscomirandahernandez7510 5 лет назад +2

      It was embarrassing... I don´t understand why many people who assisted to that event doesn't speak english even in a basic level.

    • @sinkec
      @sinkec 5 лет назад +14

      Francisco Miranda Hernández Too bad you weren’t on that stage to enlighten us all with that stunning grammar of yours

    •  5 лет назад +1

      @@sinkec all you need is a smidgen of English-grammar genius to belittle non-English speaking nobodies. GREAT TASTE!

    • @johnlawrence2757
      @johnlawrence2757 4 года назад +1

      Jabib Galt Dawkins should have been banned from media appearance for life for calling the audience liars: how dare he do such a thing.

    • @jabibgalt5551
      @jabibgalt5551 4 года назад +1

      @Ezio Auditore Why does it have to be about skin color? Maybe they just agree with him.

  • @david203
    @david203 3 года назад +47

    I am very impressed with this audience, who through their applause and other reactions show a great deal of intelligence in evaluating these two speakers. This clearly shows the excellence of the public education available in México.

    • @rekunta
      @rekunta 2 года назад +4

      Applauding Deepak’s nonsense is certainly not indicative of intelligence in the evaluation of his arguments.
      They are laughably pseudo-scientific ramblings that should be mocked, not applauded.

    • @chrisbennett6260
      @chrisbennett6260 Год назад

      @@rekunta one man meat is another man poison

    • @BetoIME93
      @BetoIME93 Год назад +1

      @@rekunta The problem with Dawkins is that he doesn't understand the concept of consciousness of Chopra, this universe is hierarchical, there are complex systems that integrate other more complex systems that react to their environment, if this reaction is called the "level of consciousness" then we can exemplify the cells that make up our body, they communicate through chemical signals but are not aware of the being that they integrate, Dawkins is like that cell unable to understand the hypothesis that it could form a more complex system and that it could therefore have a level of consciousness incomprehensible and superior to that of the human being

    • @husamstarxin4626
      @husamstarxin4626 Год назад +1

      @@BetoIME93Yes, Dawkins doesn't understand consciousness but Bet Ol ME not only understands it but is selling books on it !

    • @Southpaw88
      @Southpaw88 Год назад

      ​@nickers7409 fr wtf is he saying😂😂

  • @martintraphagen3698
    @martintraphagen3698 4 года назад +73

    "Whoever knows he is deep, strives for clarity; whoever would like to appear deep to the crowd, strives for obscurity. For the crowd considers anything deep if only it cannot see to the bottom: the crowd is so timid and afraid of going into the water."
    This is the dynamic between these thinkers - you tell me who is who.....

    • @usmanazam449
      @usmanazam449 3 года назад +6

      Deepak is an idiot that i know

    • @baitman2368
      @baitman2368 3 года назад +1

      Nietzsche?

    • @2fast2block
      @2fast2block 2 года назад

      I can say this, Dawkins is a loser.
      Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
      Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
      We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
      God is the reason for us and all we have.
      ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
      “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
      We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
      The odds are NOT there.
      ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
      No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
      ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
      Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
      The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”

    • @krazykirl1129
      @krazykirl1129 2 года назад

      That's profound! I have a nick name for Chopra, Deepcuck.

    • @2fast2block
      @2fast2block 2 года назад

      Krazy Kirl
      "That's profound! I have a nick name for Chopra, Deepcuck."
      I'm no fan of Deepak at all and I'm sure not a fan of dolt Dawkins. As I showed, he hates science.

  • @hiheloByby6902
    @hiheloByby6902 4 года назад +283

    " Oxygen has Emotions "
    __ Deepak Chopra

    • @sumairahmad9464
      @sumairahmad9464 4 года назад +30

      Dawkins has raped an amoeba . It told me in my transcendence . Arrest him - Depak

    • @bint-abdullah
      @bint-abdullah 4 года назад +2

      @@sumairahmad9464 😂😂

    • @raajkumar9030
      @raajkumar9030 4 года назад +3

      But oxygen is generated from conciousness but oxygen has memory and water has memory...its already proved....for anything which has memory,there should be fundamental orgin rite ?..

    • @tommydawson7147
      @tommydawson7147 4 года назад

      Thats true, you didnt see tha water experiment with words....

    • @anandhua.b4589
      @anandhua.b4589 4 года назад +14

      @@raajkumar9030 bruh

  • @paulkiarie6538
    @paulkiarie6538 3 года назад +33

    "i respect scientist who use a simple language to understand,"i like that.

  • @MikkoRantalainen
    @MikkoRantalainen 2 года назад +6

    Thanks for sharing this whole video. I've previously seen only clips taken out of context and it was nice to finally see the whole discussion.

  • @uzumakitak1109
    @uzumakitak1109 9 лет назад +176

    "I'm gonna put 'quantum' in every sentence and that will make it scientific"-Deepak Chopra.
    "Voy a poner 'cuántico' en cada oración y eso lo hará científico"-Deepak Chopra.

    • @usmanazam449
      @usmanazam449 3 года назад +1

      I like how u translated that

    • @renzosanchezfalcon8885
      @renzosanchezfalcon8885 3 года назад

      aea otaku

    • @sankalp2520
      @sankalp2520 3 года назад +5

      Why'd you write it twice? Why did you write it twice?

    • @OrangeUtan1
      @OrangeUtan1 2 года назад +1

      "Do you guys just put the word quantum in front of everything? "

    • @juanmacaballero33
      @juanmacaballero33 11 месяцев назад

      Jajajajaj no pudiste escuchar por tus prejuicios !! Pero en todo el debate se noto la superioridad (en términos de consciencia) a favor de chopra !!!
      Me gustaria que debatimos al respecto !! Te parece ??? Es una pena que la mayoria de comentarios estén a favor de una ser completamente conectado solamente con su hemisferio izquiero, que parece mas una maquina que un ser humano
      Me gustaría saber que opina acerca del amor ? O la felicidad ?? Porque no debe tener ni puta idea. Como todos los que los siguen...
      Solo te sugiero una cosa: Investiga en profundidad a Einstein (uno de los mejores científicos de la humanidad) cuando le preguntaban sobre la existencia de dios, él siempre respondía que creía en el Dios de spinoza. lo que habla el científico spinoza es lo mismo que explica Chopra sobre la conciencia !!
      te invito a que lo investigues y lo escuches sin prejuicios en la mente porque eso te nubla tu receptividad.
      Y no solamente a Einstein y spinoza. !!! Investiga enseñanzas de Sócrates, buda y millones de científicos orientales !! Como nikola tesla hablan de la conciencia Investiga y Estos tipos son muchos mas que este chico Dawkins

  • @SweetComputing
    @SweetComputing 3 года назад +170

    I am in complete awe at how Dr. Dawkins tries to drive the audience back to the point comprehension from the jargon Dr. Chopra is throwing out there in quantum leaps in not so quantum quantity..

    • @2fast2block
      @2fast2block 2 года назад

      Really? Loser Dawkins puts you in awe?
      Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
      Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
      We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
      God is the reason for us and all we have.
      ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
      “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
      We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
      The odds are NOT there.
      ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
      No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
      ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
      Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
      The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”

    • @SanSha2100
      @SanSha2100 2 года назад +4

      In simple word you are saying that you HATE deepak and have no interest in scientific exploration.

    • @luisferreira6189
      @luisferreira6189 2 года назад

      @@SanSha2100 deepak engages in a quasi scientific illusion and speculation it is not a sound evidence based scientific method

    • @MistaaPep
      @MistaaPep 2 года назад +5

      @@SanSha2100 WHATTTTT

    • @kimbirch1202
      @kimbirch1202 2 года назад +1

      Some folk are willing to believe what they are told to believe by science, although they have no.direct personal evidence, in just the same way that some believe everything they are told to believe by religion.
      Don't have any blind beliefs, but keep an open mind.

  • @coolguy5772
    @coolguy5772 8 лет назад +171

    I really wonder what Richard Dawkins was thinking while WHATEVER THE FUCK WAS GOING ON IN THE BEGINNING was going on

    • @MarcoScetta
      @MarcoScetta 8 лет назад +1

      LMAO totally!

    • @kakashifuijin
      @kakashifuijin 8 лет назад +2

      My thought exactly

    • @Piterixos
      @Piterixos 8 лет назад

      I actually liked the music xD

    • @tigressnsnow
      @tigressnsnow 7 лет назад

      KlaasDeKaasBaas
      They were hooked up to a translation device. You can see that black device in their ears.

    • @khjewels
      @khjewels 6 лет назад +2

      Hilarious!! I thought I was on the wrong video!

  • @bellarosalarsen1638
    @bellarosalarsen1638 2 года назад +9

    I am so grateful. No words. Thank you Richard for representing humanity, freedom in such an eloquent, beautiful way. I am so grateful I found home. ❤️

    • @abelochoa584
      @abelochoa584 Год назад

      You're totally wrong, Dawkins only represents cynical atheists who are full of vulgarity and sheer impotence and will never ever win a debate because they reject spirituality rhout really having intelligent arguments.

  • @romefox
    @romefox 3 года назад +29

    That intro is how Deepak interprets science.

  • @NikkyKicks
    @NikkyKicks 8 лет назад +121

    skip to about 3:26 to skip the crazy opening

    • @NikkyKicks
      @NikkyKicks 8 лет назад +31

      11:36 is where the dialogue actually begins

    • @garygarcia05
      @garygarcia05 8 лет назад +5

      I scrolled down looking for some comment like yours. Thx a lot!

    • @kozhedub
      @kozhedub 7 лет назад +3

      My question is WHY

    • @kingcastaway07
      @kingcastaway07 6 лет назад

      thank youuuuuu!!! you are a nice and lovely person xD

    • @magnified4827
      @magnified4827 6 лет назад

      Nicholas Nace learnt some Spanish 😄😄 nice language.

  • @alancoellopilay
    @alancoellopilay 3 года назад +36

    Excellent comments and arguments by Richard Dawkins.

  • @trevorsimmons1768
    @trevorsimmons1768 2 года назад +41

    I have year 7 students with a stronger comprehension of matter than Deepak has. Still shocked Richard gave him the time of day.

    • @confidential303
      @confidential303 Год назад +4

      Trevor don't overestimate yourself. There are kids that knows more about this universe then you ever will be.

    • @JonasAnandaKristiansson
      @JonasAnandaKristiansson Год назад

      Matter does't exist. I feel for your students.

  • @nabils9837
    @nabils9837 6 лет назад +146

    27:10 "you're lying" LOL I love Dawkins' brute responses

    • @LucasBatistussi
      @LucasBatistussi 5 лет назад +2

      Nabil Saleh I love that moment

    • @ddsgabo
      @ddsgabo 4 года назад +14

      I think Richard was just tired of so much ignorance and got frustrated.

    • @briansmith3791
      @briansmith3791 4 года назад +3

      @Nabil S : 79 likes for a comment that 'loves' Dawkins calling ordinary people liars! He is publicly showing his contempt for those of us who are not of the 'elite', who didn't attend Oxbridge, Harvard, Yale etc, and 79 people applaud this? To paraphrase George Carlin, 'Wake up, it's a big elitist club and YOU ain't in it.'

    • @HAL-iv2kd
      @HAL-iv2kd 4 года назад +1

      @@briansmith3791 Shut the fuck up, you willing ignorant

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodsa9058
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodsa9058 4 года назад +1

      @@HAL-iv2kd Shut the fuck up you unwilling ignorant!!!

  • @floydcomstick5960
    @floydcomstick5960 8 лет назад +376

    on behalf of the youtube community , let me rename this video to its correct situation
    "Footage of Richard Dawkins Being Tortured"

  • @pedanticvampire8121
    @pedanticvampire8121 7 лет назад +75

    Skip to 11:37 for the start of the debate.

  • @adrilith1989
    @adrilith1989 3 года назад +33

    Siempre contigo Richard ❤️🌼

  • @Lu5ck
    @Lu5ck 10 лет назад +82

    i am not a science person but it seems like deepak is talking about many different things including way of life to prove his points while dawkins using accurate honest words to explain facts

    • @0oMag
      @0oMag 7 лет назад +4

      Lu5ck what did Dawkins actually explain? Specifically? All I heard was that he can't actually prove anything.

    • @madelena1234
      @madelena1234 6 лет назад +3

      Dawkins is not able to comprehend Deepak, as you are not either.

    • @BlueFury2577
      @BlueFury2577 5 лет назад +6

      @@madelena1234 That's because Deepak isn't saying anything of substance. You're just easily fooled by the sciency words sprinkled at random in his sentences.

    • @Elintasokas
      @Elintasokas 5 лет назад +5

      @@0oMag You don't have to falsify nonsense for it to be nonsense. All Deepak did was spit out unfalsifiable, nonsensical claims one after another. I could say there's invisible magic god stuff flying in the air that controls our subconscious minds. Does that mean it's rational to believe in such a thing just because you can't prove me wrong? Hell no.

    • @0oMag
      @0oMag 5 лет назад

      @@Elintasokas how is that in any way shape or form coherent to my question?

  • @ConvictedFelon2024
    @ConvictedFelon2024 4 года назад +182

    Deepak's presence at the debate was an insult to Richard Dawkin's intelligence.

    • @pourushsirohi4091
      @pourushsirohi4091 3 года назад +3

      Intellectualism not intelligence.

    • @muchanadziko6378
      @muchanadziko6378 3 года назад +2

      @@pourushsirohi4091 whatever "intellectualism" is in this scenario
      And the OP meant "intelligence"

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve Год назад +7

      It was also an insult to his patience. How it survived intact is better proof of any mystical unknown than any of Deepak's bullshit screeds.

    • @troyano6548
      @troyano6548 Год назад +2

      Totally agree with you 💯

    • @qalat23
      @qalat23 Год назад +2

      I could only say thank you for sharing your thoughts. Richard Dowkin's is a light for all blind people of the world and Deepak is the one who sell beautiful lies.

  • @vandanamalhotra1657
    @vandanamalhotra1657 3 года назад +39

    Damn, Richard Dawkins is one very patient man. Very honest and patient. Bless him I wish him very good health.
    Deepak I feel was genuine in his quest for scientific education but lost his way into fiction as he is bringing up some questions of thought from all the scientists of various fields and textbooks he mentioned

    • @vidyanandbapat8032
      @vidyanandbapat8032 2 года назад

      Deepak Chopra had always been a charlatan since the very beginning. Why did a person as intelligent as Richard Dawkins even accepted to debate with this idiot?

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve Год назад

      The guy formed his image through has signature diamond-studded glasses and a load of lucrative endorsements showing his smug mug wearing them. I think it's quite easy to see the intentions of Deepak's quest and how genuine he really is. What baffles me is how the grift ever worked.

    • @briansmith3791
      @briansmith3791 Год назад

      @@FakingANerve ..and Dawkins came from British Colonial Kenya, brought up with native servants, then to England to a house paid for by a slave-owning ancestor. From fee-paying private school to Oxford, where he has lived ever since. And people wonder why he has no idea of the world the rest of us live in? His condemnation of Julian Assange says it all.

  • @bellarosalarsen1638
    @bellarosalarsen1638 2 года назад +4

    I bow to you, Richard, always. 💖Thank you.

  • @damirdze
    @damirdze 6 лет назад +32

    Dr Dawkins did excellent. It is very difficult to deal with the people who mingle the scientific concepts in such a way to produce confusing hipothesis.

  • @thomasward3309
    @thomasward3309 4 года назад +31

    Seeing this live must have been legendary

    • @TunezCottage
      @TunezCottage 4 года назад +8

      I couldn't imagine listening to Deepak without having the option to pause, take a few deep breaths and facepalm.

    • @shamanicrevolution2204
      @shamanicrevolution2204 3 года назад +1

      Literally

    • @MontysKillerRabbit
      @MontysKillerRabbit 2 года назад +1

      @@TunezCottage
      How about a large amount of drugs before listening to this nimrod?

  • @davidsosa538
    @davidsosa538 4 года назад +88

    Dr. Dawkins has the patience of a saint

    • @ayoungconservative1051
      @ayoungconservative1051 2 года назад +6

      To him that would be an insult.

    • @SanSha2100
      @SanSha2100 2 года назад

      That is why he used ad hominem fallacy of science 101, several times. No saint or person with patience will use abusive language.

    • @tayyeb2590
      @tayyeb2590 Год назад

      The irony 🤣

  • @oppanheimer
    @oppanheimer 2 года назад +10

    Dawkins is the honest one in this discussion and I respect all his attributes, especially his patience.

  • @danielbastidas8109
    @danielbastidas8109 4 года назад +159

    I need Richard's patience

    • @laststrikestudios1839
      @laststrikestudios1839 3 года назад +16

      If we all had Dawkins' patience the world would be a better place.

    • @TheContrariann
      @TheContrariann 3 года назад +2

      True

    • @Being_Jeff
      @Being_Jeff 3 года назад

      Of the two which one showed the most patience to the others point of view?

  • @TupacMakaveli1996
    @TupacMakaveli1996 3 года назад +72

    Man when I was younger I thought it would take me a while to understand deepak but as I grew and understood more (went to university) I realized it’s not important lol. I can literally skip but just listening to his keywords and move on to next line. Because the sentences have no meaning they are just built on keywords to make them sound interesting. Dawkins is legend

    • @drawbaguilkilju5804
      @drawbaguilkilju5804 3 года назад

      :D

    • @baitman2368
      @baitman2368 3 года назад

      lol

    • @ravenvalentine4919
      @ravenvalentine4919 3 года назад +9

      he just sounds like he knows soo much when clearly he does not understand anything , he is like a science book after a dog eats it and poops it and you try tor read the torn and chewed pages , all the words are there but they mean nothing

    • @helmutgensen4738
      @helmutgensen4738 3 года назад

      How did you manage such a terrible leap of faith? closing your mind so spontaneously

    • @TupacMakaveli1996
      @TupacMakaveli1996 3 года назад +2

      @@helmutgensen4738 took me 5 years. Wasn’t spontaneous

  • @LesPaul2006
    @LesPaul2006 9 лет назад +454

    "Atoms can think."
    Deepak Chopra.

    • @ErickRelentless
      @ErickRelentless 9 лет назад +27

      LesPaul2006 That Phrase can be seen as the most smartest thing ever said, as well as the most stupid. But actually no one can prove that is right or wrong.

    • @LesPaul2006
      @LesPaul2006 9 лет назад +55

      Erick Relentless Evidence strongly suggests it is wrong. They do behave weird allright, but not as if they could think.

    • @ErickRelentless
      @ErickRelentless 9 лет назад +6

      You're right, there are "strong" evidence on both sides but nothing is proved.

    • @LesPaul2006
      @LesPaul2006 9 лет назад +49

      Erick Relentless Not on both sides. The only "evidence" for the consciousness of atoms is Chopra's wishful thinking.

    • @ErickRelentless
      @ErickRelentless 9 лет назад +7

      LesPaul2006 The double slit experiment it's a really good point to believe that atoms has some kind of awareness, also some of the conclusions of Shrödinger. In the other side we have the postulate of Decoherence that is enough strong to make you think that atoms are not aware.

  • @juanmanuelgonzalezsaucedo4749
    @juanmanuelgonzalezsaucedo4749 2 года назад +10

    Veo por primera vez éste debate. A veces veo documentales sobre cada uno de los invitados. Me parecen fantásticos. Siempre aportan algo a mi entendimiento. Tal vez si no los pusieran a competir terminariamos enriqueciendo más nuestro conocimiento. El moderador me pareció que dirigía un "espectáculo" o "concurso" de los que suele haber en la tv abierta mexicana...

    • @yuzoookun
      @yuzoookun 2 года назад +1

      Deepak no dice absolutamente nada por más minutos que hable. Es imposible que entiendas nada y si llamas comprensión a eso que sientes cuando le escuchas simplemente haz el ejercicio de explicar lo que has entendido para que veamos la lógica de ello. Lo preocupante si crees entender algo es que no seas capaz de distinguir la una frase con significado de una que no lo tiene y no veas la diferencia entre uno y otro.

    • @randominternetguy3537
      @randominternetguy3537 Год назад +3

      @@yuzoookun muchas gracias. Iba a decir exactamente lo mismo. el hombre dice tantas palabras pero ninguna de sus palabras transmite una idea real.
      Además, lo siento por el mal español. Google tradujo todo esto.

    • @juanmacaballero33
      @juanmacaballero33 11 месяцев назад

      Jajajajajaja es que si no lo entendes ds justamente porque nunca agarraste un puto libro de espiritualidad (no hablo de religión )
      En casi todo el debate chopra lo deja sin palabras esta claramente mucho mas avanzado !!!
      Que es la consciencia para vos ????
      Que es el "yo" ???
      Pudiste experimentar el proceso de pensamiento como ilusion a traves de la meditación ???
      Los monjes budistas si escuchan a estos cientificos dirían que ni siquiera llegaron a Jardin de infancia
      Me encataria tener un debate contigo ya que (al igual que ese tipo) subestiman tanto a los sabios de la antigüedad como: Sócrates, buda, lao tse, Einstein, el cientifico spinoza, y millones de sabios que pisaron esta tierra y hablaron de la enseñanza mas poderosa que es el amor.. Estoy seguro que tampoco me podes describir el amor. Porque vas a decir que es una reaccion quimica en el cerebro jajaja que robots que son muchos de los ateos ​@@yuzoookun

    • @juanmacaballero33
      @juanmacaballero33 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@randominternetguy3537cual no te parece real ???

  • @Neodipo
    @Neodipo 7 лет назад +78

    Lmao that mediator needs to start hosting wrestling matches. Lmao what a hype man.

    • @MarlboroughBlenheim1
      @MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 года назад +2

      I’m not sure he had an understanding of the issues or languages being spoken.

    • @w9ill856
      @w9ill856 3 года назад +1

      I never thought that before you're right hahaha.

    • @leopardosss
      @leopardosss 3 года назад +1

      LOOOOLLLL

  • @ApolloGG
    @ApolloGG 5 лет назад +139

    They have headphones in the audience, so I'm assuming they're translating it as they go. I wonder how the translators translate Chopra's word salads. Must be a complete headache.

    • @goatamongsheep4296
      @goatamongsheep4296 4 года назад +5

      The english 'translation' is flawed = not accurate; and they are speaking ENGLISH. I can just imagine how many errors there must be in translation to another language.

    • @Kevin-ul8ux
      @Kevin-ul8ux 4 года назад +7

      Or maybe it's really easy to translate nonsense. Just say a bunch of words in another language that, together, make no sense.

  • @robinghosh8891
    @robinghosh8891 3 года назад +61

    Really a very Great person is Mr. Dawkins, who very expertly proved that Science will continue to make great progress in understanding the world ...in spite of non entity and stupid people trying to dishonour the noble study of Science and the Scientists and misleading the gullible public....We are with you Dawkins Sir....

  • @leafgreensniper13
    @leafgreensniper13 Год назад +6

    Dawkins earned my respect at the 48:05 mark by admitting ignorance for how conscious exists.

  • @alisonmartinez4437
    @alisonmartinez4437 4 года назад +25

    Que ganas de escuchar todo lo que tenían que decir sin interrupciones.

  • @Richytomaster
    @Richytomaster 4 года назад +10

    Cómo no consiguieron un mejor presentador para este diálogo tan extraordinario?!

    • @jondalarpv2029
      @jondalarpv2029 3 года назад +1

      Su problema es que tiene un ingles pesimo y estoy seguro que hubo mucha gente que solo aplaudió por aplaudir

    • @ruloruiz3069
      @ruloruiz3069 2 года назад +3

      De pena ajena y el publico también :(

  • @OnlyNewAgeMusic
    @OnlyNewAgeMusic 6 лет назад +63

    Atoms don’t have awareness - Awareness has Atoms :)

  • @mouthofspaghetti7817
    @mouthofspaghetti7817 2 года назад +28

    One person is coherent, easy to follow and the other is Deepak

    • @2fast2block
      @2fast2block 2 года назад

      Lies to other liars can be easy to follow.
      Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
      Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
      We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
      God is the reason for us and all we have.
      ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
      “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
      We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
      The odds are NOT there.
      ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
      No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
      ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
      Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
      The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”

  • @lawrencenjoroge
    @lawrencenjoroge 3 года назад +18

    If you close your eyes this sounds like a conversation between Richard Dawkins and King Julien from the penguins of Madagascar

  • @IEE-nc3jc
    @IEE-nc3jc 4 года назад +184

    It's really remarkable that Deepak can talk complete nonsense for that amount of time without having any regret 😂

    • @abdulfahadabro5294
      @abdulfahadabro5294 2 года назад +2

      You are idiot and will remain idiot he is the one who trying to take you out from your idiotness.

    • @sudhak5057
      @sudhak5057 2 года назад +3

      Just because you don't understand something, that does not make it complete nonsense!

    • @asolomoth1066
      @asolomoth1066 2 года назад +7

      It does if the person saying the stuff doesn't understand it...

    • @respectfulgamer7232
      @respectfulgamer7232 2 года назад +2

      @@abdulfahadabro5294 Why don't you explain why he's an idiot?

    • @Jessiejam-44
      @Jessiejam-44 2 года назад +2

      If You can’t dazzle the “Perceived Brilliance” baffle Them With Your BS, Depak Chopra....

  • @jalsiddharth
    @jalsiddharth 4 года назад +46

    The number of facepalms RD had this session is the stuff of legend lol.

  • @MarkusAxunIllianus
    @MarkusAxunIllianus 2 года назад +11

    Deepak: I explain something I hardly understand with something I do not understand at all.

  • @simay4977
    @simay4977 5 лет назад +85

    Choprah and the Woo-woo again. I've never heard so many words being spoken without anything being said.

    • @vegeta1729
      @vegeta1729 4 года назад

      Very well said!

    • @mikedean5060
      @mikedean5060 4 года назад +4

      Try Kellyanne Conway and Sarah Palin

    • @DocBree13
      @DocBree13 4 года назад +1

      true - except for the parts where he was just plain wrong

    • @DocBree13
      @DocBree13 4 года назад +2

      A K this is all even worse than the crap Chopra sells - you are completely ignorant or just lying about all of the science you included - and the rest isn’t even wrong it’s so ridiculous

    • @MarlboroughBlenheim1
      @MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 года назад +3

      Find Jordan Peterson when he gets onto God. You’ll hear it.

  • @tsjayaraj9669
    @tsjayaraj9669 6 лет назад +42

    If Quantum theory explained in Deepak Chopra's books worked , we could have seen him still young.

  • @24DeepSky
    @24DeepSky 8 лет назад +56

    I respected Dawkins more after watching this.

  • @benjaminfrueh1526
    @benjaminfrueh1526 3 года назад +14

    I had to pause each time after Chopra spoke, so that I could clear my head of the intense, throbbing pain and listen to the intelligible, sensible, articulate response from Dawkins.

    • @ravenvalentine4919
      @ravenvalentine4919 3 года назад

      its like you need to wash your brain from the stupid after every exposure , i have no idea what sorta haypiles exist in the heads of people who live on chopacobra's woo saladios

  • @oscarherr4198
    @oscarherr4198 4 года назад +49

    Deepak : You are doing a fallacy ad hominem
    Also Deepak: *Proceeds to make several fallacies in a row in every sentence*

  • @malayneum
    @malayneum 4 года назад +43

    if you close your eyes, this is a debate between Dawkins and the Lemur in Madagascar.

    • @juleslu8403
      @juleslu8403 3 года назад +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @matwatson7947
      @matwatson7947 3 года назад +3

      It's so true. I closed my eyes after reading this comment.
      Hilarious

    • @ericksoledispa2726
      @ericksoledispa2726 3 года назад +1

      Hahahaahhahaah

    • @internationalrtg5602
      @internationalrtg5602 3 года назад +1

      Best comment 😂

    • @Jaithesaintt
      @Jaithesaintt 2 года назад +2

      Waiting for parking the past hour. ANGRY. Lmao. And now I’m cracking TF UP 😂😂😂😂

  • @MarlboroughBlenheim1
    @MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 года назад +108

    It was like watching an adult speak with a teenager for an hour on what it’s like to be an adult.

    • @sudhak5057
      @sudhak5057 2 года назад

      So who was the adult here?

    • @MarlboroughBlenheim1
      @MarlboroughBlenheim1 2 года назад +9

      @@sudhak5057 I thought you were serious for a minute.

    • @sudhak5057
      @sudhak5057 2 года назад

      @@MarlboroughBlenheim1 I am serious!

    • @SantaClaauz
      @SantaClaauz 2 года назад +1

      Presumably the one cursing and insulting is not the adult?

    • @MarlboroughBlenheim1
      @MarlboroughBlenheim1 2 года назад +9

      @@SantaClaauz the one who is a pigmy in the world of science and reason and who believes in non specific non demonstrable ideas

  • @Mufasa4142
    @Mufasa4142 2 года назад +5

    There is deeper consciousnes in us all, that throws out this universe at the speed of light. Wow

    • @flemingcourt
      @flemingcourt 2 года назад +3

      rhetoric - meaningless like most of what Mr. Chopra exudes

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve Год назад

      This bullshit expressed its intentionality by crossing the universal consciousness in a quantum shift.

  • @vpower7632
    @vpower7632 4 года назад +45

    Word salad. I never heard the term before but when I hear this Deepak spew, I understand the term without a need to have it explained.

    • @natanaellizama6559
      @natanaellizama6559 3 года назад +1

      He misused it. What Deepak stated was comprehensible. You may argue he was wrong, but it is blatantly dishonest and contrary to debate etiquette to call it 'word salad' just because he was unable to comprehend it. You can't argue with 'word salad', it isn't an argument, it is an ad hominem.

    • @phild249
      @phild249 3 года назад

      @The Iguana It's a get out for not having factual answers, a diversionary tactic to fill the time,and to convince those who don't understand that he was talking jargon.

    • @ThePookaHarvey
      @ThePookaHarvey 3 года назад

      @The Iguana Chopra is using scientific terminology in a way that doesnt make sense in the way that scientists define them. It's possible he has his own definitions for these terms, philosophers sometimes do this, but in such circumstances where your definitions differ to the widely accepted ones you need to explain what they are. Without an accepted definition of the words we use to debate one another the conversation has no meaning. Chopra never takes the time to define the special meanings he might be giving to these terms which would make the things he says make sense. In the most charitable light possible, he might well be making profound points, but the onus really should be on him to make them intelligable.

  • @darkenergy8318
    @darkenergy8318 6 лет назад +63

    Chopra fallacies :
    1) Personal incredulity .
    2) Composition fallacy .
    3) Argument from authority .

    • @quotesofaeon9408
      @quotesofaeon9408 5 лет назад +4

      I'm from India .
      I believe some thoughts of Deepak Chopara but whatever he's saying here is bullshit .

  • @unjust7156
    @unjust7156 5 лет назад +60

    Deepak: Can I ask you a question?
    **proceeds into asking a few hundred questions that are completely meaningless**

  • @MikkoVille
    @MikkoVille 2 года назад +10

    I am truly baffled that some (or very many, apparently) find Deepak Chopra somehow wise and intelligent.

  • @jimmy90249
    @jimmy90249 10 лет назад +27

    If you want to know about consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, you should watch a debate between Quantum Physicists, not a Biologist and an alternative medicine doctor.

  • @johnnybravos9280
    @johnnybravos9280 4 года назад +30

    Mr.Moderator after each sentence of Chopra and Dawkins: "Wow, un aplauso por favor" 😁

  • @diegomedina6704
    @diegomedina6704 6 лет назад +68

    Ojalá que al que pensó lo del cronómetro lo hayan despedido :v

  • @482jpsquared
    @482jpsquared 2 года назад +7

    I hope that Dawkins had the opportunity to read these comments to know the appreciation so many have for him. Yet, I assume he does and doesn't require the admiration.

  • @etherealsky7078
    @etherealsky7078 5 лет назад +51

    Deepak Chopra: *says anything*
    Audience: 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
    Richard Dawkins: ...

  • @RenatusChristoph
    @RenatusChristoph 6 лет назад +53

    Thanks Mr Dawkins, for your relentless Socratic urge to call out these mumbo-jumbo pseudoscientifical idiots and exposing their claim to knowledge when in fact there is none.

    • @briansmith3791
      @briansmith3791 4 года назад +2

      @Rene Xhristoph: That comment made me laugh. Comparing Dawkins to Socrates? The Greek was famous for saying he knew he didn't know. The Kenyan thinks he knows. Dawkins' arrogance is astonishing. To publicly call a man a liar when the man was telling the truth, to say an eminent physicist is wrong without evidence, to accuse his opponent of "willful obscurantism" is certainly not Socratic, it's the opposite, it's the actions of a closed mind. Read this famous quote from Herbert Spencer and then look again at Dawkins' behaviour in this debate. Spencer: "There is a principle which is a bar to all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance, that principle is contempt prior to investigation."

    • @RenatusChristoph
      @RenatusChristoph 4 года назад +3

      @@briansmith3791 Socrates would surely lose his temper with willful ignorants like Chopra and yourself - as you are inferior to all the interlocutors he faces in Plato's dialogues. None of them are putting forward theories nearly as obscure as this New Age bullshit that Chopra exposes here. "A single cell has consciousness..." "Atoms are sentient..."
      What is arrogant is the claim to truth (and ignorance for that matter). And that part I'll give you: Dawkins is not willing (as are all the modern scientific faculties) to examine his/their own theories. The theory of evolution is surely open to critique, but neither Dawkins, Chopra, you or any other fanatics are able to carry it out. So yes, Dawkins is arrogant, but at least he does acknowledge about consciousness that “of course, we don’t understand it”; "I don't know" (34:00;48:08). So does Socrates about virtue, justice, etc. If you don’t realize this about the Socratic arrogance then you haven’t read the dialogues well enough. The heart of the Socratic doctrines are not explicit in Plato's ouevre. They must be unlocked by a careful and patient reader.
      The claim to ignorance is at the very heart of what we call Socratic irony, which is found to be very arrogant by almost all of the interlocutors. After all, Socrates was said to be a philosopher - a lover of wisdom. But the ignorance has an implicit meaning which coerces a interlucutor who is driven by undoubtful, biased and close-minded truth-telling. He is ironic about his ignorance on account of this very purpose, I believe. The kind of irony where one understates and hides the fact that one has investigated a great number of opinions about something. The "Meno" is recommendable to read on this very issue. Read this and the “Theaetetus” and you’ll find a Socrates that knows a lot of things while dumbfounded and ignorant. And in the "Charmides" he even has a critique about whether one would be able to know if one didn’t. Surely, you haven’t read that dialogue, have you, Brian?
      Why that quote by Spencer? If you hold - as you do - that Chopra speaks the truth about consciousness here, then - surely - there is no need to investigate further into the matter. For the truth of any matter cannot be investigated, if one claims to possess it. You cannot look for something you have already. The other extreme: If one doesn't know anything about the thing one is searching for; then how would one realise it, if one would find it by chance. Therefore; some knowledge is always present; or rather opinions about things.
      Socrates has them, Dawkins has them, Chopra has them, you and I have them. Some are better then others. Chopra can - granted - express some things I would sympasize with. But he is fucking annoyingly arrogant. Even more so than Dawkins and that's saying a lot. For example at 43:40 he asks, if he can ask Dawkins 'a question'. The question - which contains at least 15 questions and the name dropping of 5 or 6 philosophers - ends at 45:18, where the moderator is forced to cut Chopra off. At 45:43, leaving Dawkins 25 seconds to answer, Chopra interrupts, now willing to 'ask' again, but gets denied by the moderator. That is just the very epitome of arrogant behavior. He is so full of himself.

    • @briansmith3791
      @briansmith3791 4 года назад +1

      @@RenatusChristoph: You are doing exactly what Dawkins did, namely insulting your opponent. Now I'M willfuly ignorant and a fanatic? A fanatical what? And it was the esteemed Physicist Freeman Dyson who said that atoms are sentient, though i wouldn't quite call him a New-Ager; he was 83 when he died earlier this year. The quote by Spencer refers to a closed- mind, obviously. Dawkins' closed-mind, and his inability to grasp that when someone disagrees with him it doesn't mean that person is a liar or stupid. And no, i haven't studied Socrates, and i really have no desire to.There are far too many interesting scientific theories to keep modern man occupied. In my opinion, science, not philosophy, will reveal the truth about the Universe. But i do have enough knowledge of the subjects discussed to understood what both Dawkins and Chopra were saying, when clearly you didn't. If you're put off by the thought that all this is New Age nonsense, then the Professor of Cognitive Science, Donald Hoffman, may help you to understand some of the stuff Chopra was on about. And i'm not a big fan of Chopra, his personality doesn't appeal to me, but at least he acted with some decorum. Dawkins acted like a lout. Chopra a liar, the audience liars. Shocking behaviour.

    • @RenatusChristoph
      @RenatusChristoph 4 года назад +2

      @@briansmith3791 You are a fanatic for holding that Chopra speaks "the truth" here, Brian. Short and simple. Modern science is born from philosophy, but you need to read philosophy in order to acknowledge that. Now I suggest you go read and take better care of that closed mind of yours. You clearly need to investigate the history of philosophy.

    • @RenatusChristoph
      @RenatusChristoph 4 года назад +3

      @@briansmith3791 To cut it even shorter: if you are ignorant of philosophy, you are ignorant of science as well.

  • @-yttrium-1187
    @-yttrium-1187 8 лет назад +127

    I think darwin would rethink his theory of evolution as it wouldn't explain the regression of intelligence in this man called "Deepak"

    • @imserdar
      @imserdar 7 лет назад +7

      -Yttrium- not every human evolved equally)

    • @pudurojo
      @pudurojo 6 лет назад

      The change in genes is random, means evolution decides if it can preserve the change.

    • @tyshred9251
      @tyshred9251 5 лет назад

      I cried I laughed so hard at this. Absoloutely.

    • @fadyfarouk8635
      @fadyfarouk8635 5 лет назад

      I actually it would explain this.

    • @S3SSioN_Solaris
      @S3SSioN_Solaris 5 лет назад +1

      Simple explanation. Deedik Chopra is only in it for the money.

  • @subodhghimire5508
    @subodhghimire5508 4 месяца назад

    This discussion was much needed, respect for both Geniuses

  • @charlesdolan3600
    @charlesdolan3600 8 лет назад +68

    Richard Dawkins has the patience no one can match. He's constantly bombarded by the stubborn and irrational. Deepak just pulls shit from his ass and presents it as fact.

  • @dream11paradise60
    @dream11paradise60 6 лет назад +148

    This debate is like
    Richard dawkin say 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 then comes 10
    Deepak chopra 1,2,44,59,70,99,a ,b c,d the comes XYZ

    • @katrhiknaidu1989
      @katrhiknaidu1989 4 года назад +1

      😂😂😂😂

    • @azap12
      @azap12 4 года назад

      Good summary

    • @asolarasolarasolar
      @asolarasolarasolar 4 года назад

      Great summary, fella'
      I'm getting the feeling that Derpak talked 3x more than Dawkins.

    • @cristianuribe412
      @cristianuribe412 4 года назад

      @@asolarasolarasolar But Deepak almost always loses the main idea of his arguments

    • @DocBree13
      @DocBree13 4 года назад +1

      no - because the components in your list are actually in order 😊

  • @Sfbaytech
    @Sfbaytech 4 года назад +105

    Never trust a man who wears a suit, tennis shoes and diamond studded glasses all at the same time!

    • @grv2569
      @grv2569 4 года назад +2

      There you go with that ad hominem fallacy

    • @TunezCottage
      @TunezCottage 4 года назад +7

      @@grv2569 that's not ad hominem. Ad hominem only applies in context of argument. There is no argument here. Stop applying fallacies where they don't belong.

    • @ale_ale_ale_ale
      @ale_ale_ale_ale 3 года назад +1

      HAAHHAAHHAA

    • @hotsauce153
      @hotsauce153 3 года назад +5

      @@TunezCottage I'm pretty sure he's mocking Deepak Chopra...

    • @baitman2368
      @baitman2368 3 года назад

      @@hotsauce153 Everyone with common sense

  • @thetruthalwaysscary
    @thetruthalwaysscary 2 года назад +21

    If there is a great example of woo woo science, Deepak Chopra is the champion. His strategy is that he takes real science facts and mix it up fill up with words and explanations that sounds like a well educated articulate person. There are lot of people like a part that audience who declare that they understand. "the Emperor has no clothes" phenomena. Everybody wants to be smart and while they have no idea what he talks about, they do understand some of the words and would never admit they do not understand the entirety. They can't understand since it a nonsense made up to impress and earn money / benefits from society. If you oppose such, they will tell you nthat the emperor does wear clothes you just not as educated or sophisticated as they are to see it. Hilariously dark age mentality.

    • @MarioDemaria110
      @MarioDemaria110 Год назад +3

      I agree on everything but i think bullshitters have existed throghout human history

    • @DeepakJAT0007
      @DeepakJAT0007 Год назад

      Right on !

    • @thetruthalwaysscary
      @thetruthalwaysscary Год назад

      @@MarioDemaria110 of course, how do you think humanity created tens of thousands of religions and churches

    • @MarioDemaria110
      @MarioDemaria110 Год назад

      Exactly, its just that 'dark age mentality' that made me think you thought it was just a modern plague

    • @luismunoz2957
      @luismunoz2957 10 месяцев назад

      Tal cual

  • @astraestus8828
    @astraestus8828 4 года назад +47

    This was entertaining 🤣🤣 I don't know how Dawkins got through this.

  • @Pop-zb3wr
    @Pop-zb3wr 4 года назад +86

    I believe Deepak Chopra is some amazing troll. I think he is trolling everyone for a profit.

    • @kamakhyagatekanu
      @kamakhyagatekanu 3 года назад +5

      Agreed. He's great at his act. It's not easy debating people in front of large audiences while spouting random shit and making it seem like he actually believes in what he says.

    • @nathan-498
      @nathan-498 3 года назад

      He said dopamine and adrenaline are in superposition. I think it’s safe to say he’s a complete moron.

    • @w9ill856
      @w9ill856 3 года назад

      Time transcendent consciousness its experiencing the self for the observer cannot be observed thats the non symbolic awareness.

    • @leopardosss
      @leopardosss 3 года назад

      Disagree, i think he is trying to understand the universe through he´s own experience. Just as the rest of us

    • @shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867
      @shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867 3 года назад

      @@leopardosss This is the problem with Hinduism the caste system is ingrained in its identity. Just like deepak kept trying to use argumentum ad verecundiam or appeal to authority fallacy a number of times in his arguments the basic sadhu/guru/pandit does the same the only difference is deepak is trying to keep Hinduism relevant to educated Indians while the sadhu/guru/pandit scams the uneducated Indian masses. The similarity is that both want to keep people ignorant by filling their minds and time with spiritual and metaphysical bullshit. It is to conform with hindu society and appear knowledgeable with in any group even if your the most ignorant person their is. Abrahamic religions have one cult. In hinduism every brahmin or pseudointellectual can create confusion and his very own cult.
      The scientists who do not pay attention to religion like Carl Sagan and Neil Degrasse Tyson. Who don't want people to remain ignorant due to their religious believes try to reach as large an audience as possible. They know the evils of Christianity and Islam. They do not know the disease of spreading any and all ignorant beliefs in Hinduism. It can be rewritten to fool anybody.
      Hinduism is like liquid poison. you put in a bottle it will become the bottle. you put it in a glass it will become a glass. changing it shape does not make it any less poisonous.

  • @anshiman
    @anshiman 10 лет назад +44

    Chopra's logical fallacies:
    - Ad verecundiam
    - Ad ignorantium
    - Ad bullshitem

  • @gopi1618
    @gopi1618 3 года назад +10

    How did this Deepak Chopra get so many audiences throughout the world, it is surprising.

    • @positivesecret
      @positivesecret 3 года назад +1

      You have to have a soul to understand