Using Consumer Laws in Court (Traffic Violation)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 54

  • @Awholelottaeverything
    @Awholelottaeverything 2 года назад +10

    Good job brother!!!! Only a natural man can WRITE!!!! The judge understood the assignment

    • @petesevern7638
      @petesevern7638 2 года назад

      Alando Swain: "Only a natural man can WRITE!!!!!"
      A "natural" man, eh?
      Hmmmmm......🤔.......
      Is there such a thing as an "artificial" man? And if so, what would that be?
      (Please note, from a legal point of view, a "person" is an ens legis that was created by government - and thus bound by it's creator, whereas a "man" it's not a creation of government. Man is a creation of biology.)

  • @sheriwillhite2697
    @sheriwillhite2697 Год назад +2

    I have been studying the law for 9 years as it pertains to my situation. I tell people to not believe a word I say, do your own research. You will remember it better and be able to use it to win your freedom back. I agree with everything you said. God Bless you and yours. Definition of tax, look it up.

  • @BestkeptSecret510
    @BestkeptSecret510 2 года назад +19

    When i went to court the judge was hella rude to me. After everyone was out the court room. Then the Judge got to me whole mood changed. They could not move on me until i allowed. I know the game but i usually don't go to court unless I'm practicing something. Other then that i do court thru mail. Especially traffic court cause i know it's quasi civil. Appears to be something it's not. I just got a ticket so i sent the courts my injunctions i served everyone. So now I'm waiting for their response. Also wat saves me is the fact i always reserve my rights very important.

    • @marciamarcia7449
      @marciamarcia7449 2 года назад

      what do you mean the judge could not move on you?

    • @BestkeptSecret510
      @BestkeptSecret510 2 года назад +6

      @@marciamarcia7449 the judge said i can not move forward until u grant me permission. That's wat i mean he could not do anything to me or for me until i gave him permission. Wen u know wat is going on in these courts u get a different level of respect. They my not like it but the respect it. Learn the rules to the game and ur place in commerce.

    • @YAHSRAYAHSRA
      @YAHSRAYAHSRA 2 года назад +1

      @@BestkeptSecret510 do you mind sharing where or how you learned? I’m seeking guidance and I’d love to receive some feedback from you

    • @BestkeptSecret510
      @BestkeptSecret510 2 года назад +1

      @@YAHSRAYAHSRA I Google manuals and go to the source. Which is gov sites and law.

    • @itslatrice7203
      @itslatrice7203 2 года назад +2

      I need to get to your level

  • @xTeflonDiddyx
    @xTeflonDiddyx Год назад

    Legalese!! Totally different than layman’s terms we all use everyday

  • @jonjak1360
    @jonjak1360 2 года назад +3

    I believe I read that we can be compensated for our our Legal work.

  • @ittech7967
    @ittech7967 Год назад

    the "push back" , right iv heard this several times in fact often they wont call your name in the courtroom and make you think your case records disappeared. The judge acts like he is done for the day and.... They want you to walk out than they up your fines and or issue a warrant. I had to stop the judge from leaving the courtroom. He said he or somone went to my home to look at my car and see that I did not have plates. I got new plates and gee... someone stole my plates the night before my court date. I made sure to make a police report to show the judge.

  • @angrycollector7012
    @angrycollector7012 2 года назад

    I’m new I’ve been reading diy and it’s empowering.

  • @Dieisha
    @Dieisha 2 года назад +2

    It really is simple. Standing your ground and standing up for your rights. I could tell you some stories about what happens with me numerous times. I've never had a driver's license and I go toe to toe with them in court. They try shady tactics but my cases gets dismissed with no attorney or anything. We all need to come together and put together the pieces.

    • @YAHSRAYAHSRA
      @YAHSRAYAHSRA 2 года назад +3

      Do you mind sharing the reason you don’t have a drivers license and what do you use in replace of a drivers license? As well what is the process? I would love to at least be guided on this info. There is so much to learn. I’m always scared to move forward because I feel that there is always information that I am missing

    • @petesevern7638
      @petesevern7638 2 года назад +2

      @@YAHSRAYAHSRA all too often people brag about their "successes" from operating outside the system, outside The matrix - and then when "they" are ask them to share how they did it?
      That's when they're bragging stops.
      Imo, that contributes to a poor reputation for the braggart. 👎😑👎

    • @rashaudsimmons44
      @rashaudsimmons44 Год назад

      @@YAHSRAYAHSRAyu don’t need a driver’s license to drive on public roads , unless Yur using the roads to make money like buses,Uber, taxi

  • @angrycollector7012
    @angrycollector7012 2 года назад +2

    The problem is the irs is way meaner then a bank and the system works well together

  • @jammingalways
    @jammingalways 2 года назад

    You see, this is why I loathe "SLANG" because they remove the actual meaning of WORDS!! :) Oh... MAN am I glad he mentioned that @8:26... ever heard of Sherry Peel Jackson!!! She's a LEGEND! :) I'm so glad the word is finally getting out! We've ALWAYS had the power! They've just kept most too busy to dig into just how powerful we are!!

  • @petesevern7638
    @petesevern7638 2 года назад +5

    Interesting experience, but a word of foresight for you, based upon my hindsight:
    I agree, Black's law dictionary is a good source for legal definition - HOWEVER - it's NOT the ultimate authority when dealing with any judge, or government.
    Judges are NOT REQUIRED to follow the definitions from **ANY** blacks law dictionary. No.
    In a nutshell, all judges on the State level are bound by their oath to the US Constitution, federal law, and all US treaties, in addition to their respective State constitution and State laws.
    That being said, the definitions you're interested in learning AND using come from the federal codes themselves, and the judges respective State statutes.
    I hope this helps.
    🤟😉👍

    • @ryanbarberio5735
      @ryanbarberio5735 Год назад

      which black law edition should I get, does it matter

    • @petesevern7638
      @petesevern7638 Год назад +1

      @@ryanbarberio5735 , I wouldn't bother buying a blacks law dictionary as many legal definitions are available for free online.

  • @awnestyproduction
    @awnestyproduction 2 года назад +1

    What am I to study when it comes to tickets from no registration?

    • @southern_regime
      @southern_regime  2 года назад +3

      I don't have all the answers, nor am I an attorney so I cannot give you financial advice. Here's what i know.... a debt collector cannot wear a badge, nor a uniform. That would be considered false representation. A speeding ticket is an attempt to collect a debt. 15 USC 1692e talks about false and misleading representations

    • @endlesswars5958
      @endlesswars5958 2 года назад

      @@southern_regime is this the same for driving while license is suspended unknowingly?

  • @NATTYNAT
    @NATTYNAT 2 года назад +1

    Hey sis, I got a quick question. Where can I purchase the uscodes for consumer laws? What's the actual name of the book?

    • @southern_regime
      @southern_regime  2 года назад

      This is a good place to start …. www.thebureaubullies.com/shop

    • @flymine1
      @flymine1 2 года назад +7

      They are on Amazon type in 12 usc books. There are many volumes read you can start at volume 900 - 1025 or wherever you chose to. I recommend you read the books yourself they have a definition section. This way you won't be depending on someone else's comprehension or the fact that they are trying to generate money for themselves or others. Also for free the books are on Cornell University just type the same in the search. Happy reading.

    • @pinkkrushvelvet9666
      @pinkkrushvelvet9666 2 года назад +1

      You can go on their page on IG also and they have a wealth of info ... as she stated .. they also had a free webinar tonight

    • @capgroupceo7814
      @capgroupceo7814 2 года назад

      @@pinkkrushvelvet9666 stay connected to the new information coming out.

    • @pinkkrushvelvet9666
      @pinkkrushvelvet9666 2 года назад

      @@capgroupceo7814 ok

  • @alliesdbg5092
    @alliesdbg5092 2 года назад

    What's the process?

  • @BalrogslayerXD9
    @BalrogslayerXD9 2 года назад +1

    Simple all you got to do is not sign their paperwork refuse to sign refuse to give your name out and if you do or are forced to do it sign your name in all lowercase letters they hate that because they can't move forward and need capital letters to go into your trust they need your signature to go inside your trust your signature gives them authorization to go inside your trust and get money out for that BOND what's the bond set at your honor well what you listening son I just set your bond at $10,000 is my Social Security number attached to those bonds by any chance they're going to have to say yes or they're not going to say nothing at all cuz they know where you're going with this.
    that's all thereafter don't listen to these GURUS that just trying to get money out of you.
    Give you small amount of information so they can get paid they are snakes!
    Or just say I'm here making a special appearance, I am not that name that is the name of my Estate and I am the beneficiary and see what they do.
    And if they reject that challenge there flag without prejudice I first name- middle name: last name., Beneficiary am here under fraud menace and duress fiduciary Cheryl this is a social security suffocate trust action which you are now a real party and interest to this is a admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction see the United States code lawyers edition interpretive notes and decisions where it says changing of the national flag is within the discretion of the president acting as the commander-in-chief of the army and the Navy what you did was challenge their jurisdiction because courts have no jurisdiction so if they have no jurisdiction they can't do nothing to you if you want to learn more check out my boy Christopher Houser (challenge the jurisdiction)

  • @kevincrompwell1652
    @kevincrompwell1652 2 года назад +1

    Dismissals can be brought back...
    Discharge it is over...

    • @Therealnyce1
      @Therealnyce1 2 года назад +1

      From My Overstanding is...in court, once its dismissed, it's over

    • @kevincrompwell1652
      @kevincrompwell1652 2 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/lApMHqsRxNQ/видео.html

    • @kevincrompwell1652
      @kevincrompwell1652 2 года назад +1

      If the prejudice can be over turn, it can come back (bias-judge) collusion at the court...

    • @csevern5106
      @csevern5106 2 года назад +1

      Dismissals CANT be brought back ***IF*** the originals charges are/were criminal, AND dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.

  • @kempflemingheartyahusha
    @kempflemingheartyahusha Год назад

    Does this apply to UK?

    • @southern_regime
      @southern_regime  Год назад +1

      I’m not sure. These laws were put in place by US Congress

    • @kempflemingheartyahusha
      @kempflemingheartyahusha Год назад

      @southern_regime yes, I was thinking the same, I will continue to do my research, appreciate the fast reply.
      Go good.
      Kemp.

  • @csevern5106
    @csevern5106 2 года назад

    Ma'am - xcellent info, but Congress DOES NOT recognize the irs as a "debt collector". Go to the definitions used for title 15 and read #6....the term debt collector means..... At the end of that paragraph you will find, "The term does not include. . Now scroll down to (C) and the irs qualifies as not being a "debt collector" by way of this section of title 15, sorry.

    • @dapreetaxsara3833
      @dapreetaxsara3833 2 года назад

      You would be correct IF the irs or any of these fictitious entities that are instrumentalities of the US were actually under a “Government Du jour” but they are not per 28 usc 3002(15)(a) so once you understand who you are and who or better yet WHAT they are only then can you truly take control and free yourself but shutting out life changing information is ignorant

    • @petesevern7638
      @petesevern7638 2 года назад

      @@dapreetaxsara3833 First off Dupree, ya need to improve your spelling, it's De Jure, not "Du jour" lol
      Secondly, no offense is intended with the following ~ I have been studying within this 'Patriot legal movement' since the early 90s, and your basis of not considering the feds (and it's affiliation, the IRS) a proper "De Jure" government falls within the many frivolous claims that have been promoted by those who promote what I call 'Patriot mythology', so I'm not going debate/ argue issues the courts consider frivolous.

    • @dapreetaxsara3833
      @dapreetaxsara3833 2 года назад

      Lol excuse my misspelling…I meant no disrespect I only wanted to educate you and those were frivolous claims because they failed to understand that cases are won before they step in court why because they never had authority or jurisdiction to begin with and they follow the correct process but the law clearly defines who we are and who they are I didn’t make it up they did literally lol just because they dismiss it as frivolous do not mean it actually is lol but clearly you are one of those people who believe any the government say or do even though history has proven this fake government to be fraudulent in every way so thank you for your input.

    • @petesevern7638
      @petesevern7638 2 года назад

      @@dapreetaxsara3833 ok, thanks, you're being a good sport!
      😉👍
      Here is what I believe is the bottom line in regards to all this 'legal crap' - and that's what I truly believe IT IS - just a bunch of legalistic, brain-wrenching, BS. (Belief Systems.)
      It doesn't matter what I believe or what you believe - or what we don't believe.
      The only things that matter are what the Court's recognize, and they're consequential opinions (rulings).
      Everything else is speculative, subjective, HEARSAY (aka... mental and ego-based ~ 'mental masturbation'.)

  • @hueysimon2726
    @hueysimon2726 Год назад

    Here's what most people don't understand about what rights you have. There is no list of rights. You are and were born a human being, and by virtue of that, you are free. Freedom means that you can do anything you want that doesn't initiate aggression against someone else or their property or violate the freedom of others. All of the procedures and laws governments create are convoluted on purpose to keep the average person from understanding their birthright as a human. They have no authority over you. In fact, there is no such thing as authority among humans, because it presumes the right to rule over or control the actions of other people.

  • @shogunate2
    @shogunate2 2 года назад +2

    These videos are too short

  • @michaelvitetta7231
    @michaelvitetta7231 Год назад

    Wait a minute, you had your plates stolen so you originally had plates. And you think what you did was something special? Any judge would dismiss the tickets.

  • @pleilua
    @pleilua Год назад +1

    I'm getting my name change to upper lower case , what does the judge ask?