I let FSD drive my 2022 MYP from Altoona, WI to Minneapolis, MN - 102 miles - with no interventions. It even knew to move over one lane when passing a police car that had pulled someone over. Twice. Amazing.
Excellent! Most cases are easily dealt with in the latest release. However, it can also get it horribly wrong when it meets an edge case and kill you. This is the most dangerous time, when we trust it too much and don't supervise sufficiently.
In the Fremont factory, 500,000 cars are produced annually. Driving from the factory gate to the loading area took 6 minutes (a 2-minute video at 3x speed). Therefore, Tesla needs about 60 employees for car transportation. That’s quite a lot of payroll costs per year.
It won’t be too long before people will made to feel guilty for driving by hand, taking more risks. Driving will eventually be a novelty experience like a 4x4 adventure day!👍🏻 Keep up the good work, Will. I look forward to your content just as much as TTN with Zach & Jesse
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
I remember having this conversation at work before Covid. GROK could also give new owners lessons in how Tesla interface works, and Fart mode of course.
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
I saw this on X and it is amazing to see this happening. It was incredible to watch this and certainly brought a smile to my face! A great use of the FSD and really shows it can and does work. I can't wait for FSD to be available in the UK, it will help in so many ways.
I think we'll see FSD widely accepted this year, especially since now we are free from the enemy intentionally making regulations to keep Tesla at bay.
The GoP was always the one imposing the regulations to restrict general EV progress. So idk what even you’re referring to, but those in charge of regulations now are the same that have always traditionally imposed the heaviest regulations on anything EV including self driving. Thats why it was always liberal states and cities that allowed the self driving to happen at all. So either you’re confused in the past, or confused on the present. Don’t let someone take advantage of that confusion…
So if you notice the mirrors are folded in and there's only one graphic on the screen, is the vehicle recording the mileage that it's driving to the parking lot? To sell a car without the actual mileage could be considered fraud. I know it's only 1.3 MI ish. But that could be a really big class action lawsuit
I love how people continue to ignore the key differences in which Tesla propels, and continue to doubt and hate! With or without their support, Tesla is thriving, and it’ll reach a state where it’ll be inevitable to ignore Them boom, big slap on everyone’s face! I’m a weekly Tesla stock buyer, for long term, the more hate, the more fire sale 🤐
Just think how many people are employed just to deliver and collect cars. In car rental, some companies will deliver the rental car to you. This requires at least 2 people and 2 cars. One car to deliver to the customer, and another to follow that car and collect the delivery driver. Self-driving eliminates the drivers and halves the number of cars on the road. This is just one example.
Correction, it’s replacing ~1.5 drivers per delivery because driving back to the factory would have required another driver. You can’t just drop a car off and not have a good way to get back to pickup the next car.
@@TeslaJigsaw I am an Italian of flesh and blood, who was taught by his grandparents, may they rest in peace, how facism and Nazism took over Europe in the years before WWII. And who sees with horror how the social patterns that gave rise to that disaster are being repeated today. The scapegoats are different, but the discourse is the same, today enhanced by social networks. Elon is one of those responsible for amplifying this hate speech in the world. Subtly at first, but now that he has been able to buy the US presidency, he has shown his true face. Many will say that I am an overstatement, that I see things that are not. So did Europe see the Nazis in the beginning, until it was too late. 75 million people died more than 80 years ago to defeat this cancer, it cannot be that all that sacrifice was in vain. I do what I can, from wherever I can, to collaborate in spreading that message.
No doubt we’ll all be keeping a close eye on Elon for any more stupid salutes. We all know that there are many types of intelligence. Elon is a genius at many things, and an idiot at others. So are my other autistic friends. And non autistic… All Tesla fans would have face-palmed when he did that. But he’s not a Nazi!!
That will not happen - worst case the car will stop self-driving and demand that you take over. In the case of cybercab, the unit will drive for a clean up long before the issue is serious.
yep cars that will go to the outbound lot, without paying 30-50 other people to drive to the outbound just to come back again. how long before cars are driving themselves to the customer day 1, without needing a courier/transporter lol
1:14 The Fremont factory is not in, or even near LA. It's a good 6-7 hour drive from LA, near San Francisco. Also, we have Waymo here in LA (and SF). We have been driven around autonomously for about 6 months here in LA (longer in SF). It is a very odd but great experience. I will also add, my M3-FSD is a much better experience than Waymo. I think that 12 months from now, we'll have it solved and the California/Texas launch will be in full swing. I can hardly wait. Thanks for the great channel.
Yep I built a car and paid for FSD back in 2019 as I believe in it. However I agree we should be refunded until legislation locally catches up with the tech
That is cool. I've wonder how long it will be until they just deliver themselves straight to customers (who live close enough) direct from the factory. Imagine taking delivery within a couple of hours of the car coming off of the production line!
Well, in SF cars (not Tesla’s) drive them self for a few years, now. Further, the use of only cameras is a big problem think about fog for example. I would like something that is better then my eyes like radar.
What you would like though, has been proven not to be necessary. Eyes have done a pretty good job so far. Cameras are just the same (even better actually as computer reaction times are far quicker than us meat bags) People can drive in the fog, and so do Tesla's using todays FSD V.13 (plenty of videos out there to watch) Both just drive slower. Also, I believe Fog still hinders Radar and Lidar so would just be another layer of conflicting data.
I didn’t see this asked in the comments- any idea what that tunnel with all the lights does? At about 2:40 the car drives through it. My guess is it must be some kind of QA step? But then that’s a strange place to check quality so far into the drive.
Hmm? I drove my uncle's 2024 Tesla Model Y 2 weeks ago that was up to date at that time with the latest FSD update. I had the car drive me from a restaurant back to my house, a distance of about 3 miles on secondary and primary city streets. The car immediately made a couple of fairly significant mistakes: It pulled out of the driveway of the restaurant right in front of a rapidly approaching car (causing some road rage in the form of 6 or 7 honks), it cross over three lanes suddenly and crossing solid white no passing lines, it turned into a double yellow line do not cross zone, and it merged into a second lane bypassing the first lane when turning right, like a school bus driver. If I was a driving ed instructor I would have given Tesla an "F" on the driving test and would have sent it back to the learning lab. The scary thing is that my uncle, a 97 year old, is totally dependent on the FSD software for his daily driving. I think that I better stay off the sidewalks!
Don't worry. The fanboys will say that it's safer than a human. Musk will get the laws watered down and then dump this on people in the USA. Then we'll find out what the unintended consequences are.
If that were true the hundreds of thousands if not millions of Tesla's on FSD would be seriously overrepresented in accident stats and youtube would be full of it. They are not.
I used to train the guys driving cars off-on boats in the harbor, in total there are thousands of people doing that around the world - huge savings for Tesla to do it this way
Every. Vehicle. Demonstrates capability in all Teslas... and the near zero incremental cost (or now negative cost) of installing this hardware and software in every vehicle.
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
As a CNC machinist, I have almost been killed twice from motherboard crashes. But don't worry, the insurance companies have caps on how much your life is if you get killed by a computer, so Tesla won't have to pay out too much.
I’m so glad that humans never make driving mistakes. Good thing no one is on their phones or intoxicated. Could the motherboard crash? Sure…I’ll take that risk over the risk of human drivers. Just go drive a Tesla…it’s a different experience. I know… you hate Elon cause he switched teams so you must post anti-Tesla propaganda. Objectivity is hard…
@@BrunoHeggli-zp3nl The booking in Chian for the new model Y is 100.000+, and not all in the west are bots and idiots believing what ever the new thing MSM says.
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
Lithium is a very toxic element metal, unlike gold or silver, not many countries want to mine it, 98% of lithium is not recycled and goes in to land fills or dumps, causing even worst toxins in peoples water canals and ocean, it is way cheaper to mine lithium than recycle it, the huge amount of lithium used to make just one lithium car is not sustainable for all cars, lithium is a water guzzling toxic element metal, it takes 1000 gallons of clean water turned very toxic , just to mine or build one lithium car(just one)this is just lithium and not including cobalt which is another of many other real toxic element metals in the build of a lithium toxic car ( just horrible) on top of this, most lithium cars are still connected to the oil and coal grids!
Because of one photo taken in a split moment ? You might wanna see the photos of him at the memorial in Germany last year for the Jews, that isn't something a National Socialist would do.
I don't understand what the big deal is. It still can't do proper traffic like Elon promised in 2017, and it never will. It's a good safety compliment to a driver, that's it.
Come on. These cars navigate automatically in a well-known environment: no rain, snow, pedestrians, very few traffic signs, and almost no traffic. Is it impressive? Yes. Is it close to real self-driving? Not really. Tesla's current "full self-driving" requires the driver to have hands on the steering wheel to take over if necessary, and it requires human intervention every 13 miles. Every now and then, it kills someone when it leaves the road, crashes into a median divider, crashes into an emergency vehicle or traffic accident ahead, etc. It doesn't work in snow, rain, iced roads, fog, etc. It's very far from real self-driving with no steering wheel, where you can read a book or work while it drives you wherever you want to go. Being an uncritical Tesla fan is nice, but sometimes, one needs to face reality.
@firstclass000 We should be realistic. Reliable self-driving is a complex problem, and we're still far from reaching the goal. That's a fact. Opinions differ on whether it's even possible to get to real self-driving using today's tech. One of the problems is the fact that the neural networks we use sometimes produce wildly incorrect results. In the case of LLMs, it's known as "hallucination." It seems that better training of the neural networks can improve the result, but the phenomenon appears inevitable and an innate limitation of the technology used. It's plausible that until some breakthrough in the underlying theory occurs, our AI tools, including self-driving systems, will make severe mistakes occasionally. Is it good enough as an answer?
@firstclass000 People aren't good at being attentive for prolonged periods of time while not really driving, because so far everything was fine. Predictably, they start playing with their phones, eating, watching movies, and some even climb into the back seat(!). Then it's just a tragedy waiting to happen, as you might have seen in multiple crash reports. Don't get me wrong. The current self-driving is a great piece of tech, a cool gadget, and I love to try it out. But that's about it.
The "haters" and the "naysayers", huh? Who was it that promised in 2016 that a Tesla would travel coast-to-coast on its own the following year? And every single year since?
Which is exactly what they have been collecting data on for years. And therefore be so much better at avoiding than a human who sees only a handful of edge cases in a lifetime.
@@thosoz3431 And what size data set will that need and what level of processing, memory size to cover these edge cases? For instance, when I come over a bridge and the weather is rough, I know to expect strong side or other winds. When going around a bend, I might notice shade covering a section so there might be ice in that area as the sun has not melted it, but has on the rest of the road. In Wales I might see a large white blob (sheep) at one side of the road and on the other a small white blob (lamb). I know that there is a good chance one will run to the other right in from of the car, or indeed run in to the middle of the road (happened more than once). Found a 1 ton hay bale in the middle of a lane on a roundabout, that I believe FSd would have handled okay.
I recently had my first ride in a Tesla with FSD. I'm really impressed by the technology. However my ride included one dangerous mistake, when the car began to cross a clearly marked forbidden zone to merge into a busy freeway rather than continue up the ramp to the area where merging was legal. My friend (the driver) took over and steered the car back to the ramp. The incident was over before I had a chance to be scared. Far from underplaying the skill it takes to build a self-driving car, I think an enormous amount of work has gone into it. They're just not there yet.
@ The edge cases will disappear, but how soon is still an open question. In the short term, uses like this, and the promised driverless taxis in Austin are the way to go. It looks as if the Las Vegas loop is finally going to start testing driver assistance features this year, so they’ll likely be moving to driverless sooner or later. In these cases Tesla (or TBC) will have liability for any accidents. Releasing unsupervised FSD to vehicle owners still has the question of who will have liability in an accident. There will be accidents. Even activities that are safe (like flying) have accidents.
@@svenhodaka9145 That's a vague statement. Did it recently go from safer than 1% of human drivers to safer than 2%? And how is that data collected and processed? In the case I experienced, the human driver took control of the vehicle before any accident, so does that count an a dangerous event or does it not get counted at all? Who is claiming that FSD is safer? Tesla? That's like Big Tobacco claiming that cigarettes are beneficial for your health or Listerine claiming to prevent colds. I'd like to see some independent data?
It’s so important to note that “solving autonomous (whatever)”, even general navigation, is not a “once and for all” venture. Just look at what happened with DeepSeek Ri blasting open AI by undercutting cost of entry by 95%. And then a day later alibaba popooing on R1 with their new model. The only advantage that horrible human has is that he made the smart move to start early and try to gain as much as possible before the bubble pops. He is desperate. Mark my words that as soon as it’s “solved”, it’s undercut by cheaper more efficient models and methods. It’s ahead of the curve but ultimately that will cause it to be left in the dust. Just like Kodak.
I’m not saying it’s bad but… it’s bad. Using only cameras is slightly dangerous… people lost theirs lives because cameras didn’t saw what they supposed to… I know that in the end actual person is responsible for save driving but it could be prevented just using camera+radar:/ don’t get me wrong I do love Tesla but this policy is weird…
You do know that producing oil in the US is better than shipping it from abroad, as it now have to meat standards for pollution and save on shipping. And you use it for other things than gas. Less money going out and less money supporting terror and war. We can't live in a completely oil free world, but we can slowly turn it down, bur for that we need to control production of it. It don't matter that countries build up a stockpile and every time there is a thing that is a threat they flood the marked with cheap oil or buy up the new thing.
Look, this looks exciting, but the reality is that this is nothing really new, and I bet that there is a bunch of customized programming to make this possible for just this specific route. I bet that many Chinese competitors and other established can do the same. Meanwhile, here in Europe my full FSD car cannot even merge lanes.
Thats what they always say. In the early 1900s, people resisted cars, saying they were dangerous, unreliable, and unnecessary. Some believed horses were safer and that automobiles would never replace them. Now, cars are essential. Even early elevators scared people, and when automatic ones were introduced, no one trusted them without an operator. Today, no one thinks twice about stepping into one.
The one thing humans have, that the AI in a Tesla doesn't, is intuition. I get feelings all the time that a driver is going to do something stupid and modify my behavior accordingly. Luckily the Tesla can kind of simulate intuition by its training on human data plus it's much faster than a human reflex speed. Eventually intuition won't be needed as all cars will self drive and will behave predictably.... unlike we humans. Then self driving won't be as much of a challenge as it is with stupid drivers being the wheel.
So by the time it’s more than capable, its compute power will be just ticking over with ease! That’s when inference compute becomes the next wave of income and usefulness. Using its redundant capabilities on other tasks
Arguably FSD is all intuition. It is all "I have seen something like this before, I bet this is what will happen and I should do that." There is no supernatural precognition type of intuition, so it is all based on subtle clues that you may not be able to even explain, but an AI that has "driven" much longer distances under more varied conditions than any human probably has a lot of it.
If an Al can process thousands of real-world driving scenarios analyze human tendencies, and predict dangerous behaviors with precision, it might not "sense" that a driver will do something stupid-it will know based on probabilities.
"if you havent done something similarly amazing, you're not allowed to criticize tesla for failing to deliver their $15,000 software package for over 10 years, shut up then!" as amazing as what....failing to deliver? this argument is invalid, makes no sense, lacks logic, cannot see itself and is overly absurd.
It would be a wild moment in time, when you order a Tesla and it drives itself to your house for delivery after payment.
FSD has to work 1st.
@@craighermle7727it works. June it’s coming.
Not far away
And then drives back home once you miss a payment 😂💀
@@craighermle7727works pretty well…I don’t use it, but it works. Way better than I thought it would.
I let FSD drive my 2022 MYP from Altoona, WI to Minneapolis, MN - 102 miles - with no interventions. It even knew to move over one lane when passing a police car that had pulled someone over. Twice.
Amazing.
Excellent! Most cases are easily dealt with in the latest release. However, it can also get it horribly wrong when it meets an edge case and kill you. This is the most dangerous time, when we trust it too much and don't supervise sufficiently.
@@rogerfroud300well, atleast it was good while it lasted
In the Fremont factory, 500,000 cars are produced annually. Driving from the factory gate to the loading area took 6 minutes (a 2-minute video at 3x speed). Therefore, Tesla needs about 60 employees for car transportation. That’s quite a lot of payroll costs per year.
I think they recently let those people go in lieu of autonomy
It won’t be too long before people will made to feel guilty for driving by hand, taking more risks. Driving will eventually be a novelty experience like a 4x4 adventure day!👍🏻
Keep up the good work, Will. I look forward to your content just as much as TTN with Zach & Jesse
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
I’ve considered the possibility of Teslas delivering themselves directly to the consumer once self driving becomes a thing. This could be a first step
I remember having this conversation at work before Covid. GROK could also give new owners lessons in how Tesla interface works, and Fart mode of course.
@ that would be awesome!
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
Who would be at fault if there was an accident on the way? Tesla or the customer?
@ 🤷lol
Good question.
I would assume Tesla until you take delivery…I don’t know.
I can see Musk directing Tesla's factory robots from his jet. Jeannine
I saw this on X and it is amazing to see this happening. It was incredible to watch this and certainly brought a smile to my face!
A great use of the FSD and really shows it can and does work. I can't wait for FSD to be available in the UK, it will help in so many ways.
My Tesla drives me around every day. Yes, I intervene occasionally, but it’s mostly because of route preferences.
Get Taxi, it's safer
Elon said this was a done deal in 2017. Hard to not think this is staged.
I think we'll see FSD widely accepted this year, especially since now we are free from the enemy intentionally making regulations to keep Tesla at bay.
The GoP was always the one imposing the regulations to restrict general EV progress. So idk what even you’re referring to, but those in charge of regulations now are the same that have always traditionally imposed the heaviest regulations on anything EV including self driving. Thats why it was always liberal states and cities that allowed the self driving to happen at all. So either you’re confused in the past, or confused on the present. Don’t let someone take advantage of that confusion…
Great video. Just had to say, Will, Fremont is in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is at least 350 miles away from LA. Please keep up the great work.
So if you notice the mirrors are folded in and there's only one graphic on the screen, is the vehicle recording the mileage that it's driving to the parking lot? To sell a car without the actual mileage could be considered fraud. I know it's only 1.3 MI ish. But that could be a really big class action lawsuit
Awesome ❤ so cool - I bet like you said, other car companies are scratching their heads as to how to keep up!! 😂
Sadly, I bet they’re not. At best they’ll be working out how to retire early
Nice. …a cup of tea and a jigsaw piece. 😁👍
I love how people continue to ignore the key differences in which Tesla propels, and continue to doubt and hate!
With or without their support, Tesla is thriving, and it’ll reach a state where it’ll be inevitable to ignore
Them boom, big slap on everyone’s face!
I’m a weekly Tesla stock buyer, for long term, the more hate, the more fire sale 🤐
Waiting for Tesla to build my next Batmobile 😎
Just think how many people are employed just to deliver and collect cars.
In car rental, some companies will deliver the rental car to you. This requires at least 2 people and 2 cars.
One car to deliver to the customer, and another to follow that car and collect the delivery driver.
Self-driving eliminates the drivers and halves the number of cars on the road.
This is just one example.
Correction, it’s replacing ~1.5 drivers per delivery because driving back to the factory would have required another driver.
You can’t just drop a car off and not have a good way to get back to pickup the next car.
I drive with FSD 95% of the time.
Autopilot in a SwaSSticar? They say they have a strong tendency to go to the extreme right.
I don’t believe you are human. This ‘joke’ is getting tiresomely repeated over and over from bot accounts. So who are you really? 🤔
@@TeslaJigsaw I am an Italian of flesh and blood, who was taught by his grandparents, may they rest in peace, how facism and Nazism took over Europe in the years before WWII. And who sees with horror how the social patterns that gave rise to that disaster are being repeated today. The scapegoats are different, but the discourse is the same, today enhanced by social networks. Elon is one of those responsible for amplifying this hate speech in the world. Subtly at first, but now that he has been able to buy the US presidency, he has shown his true face. Many will say that I am an overstatement, that I see things that are not. So did Europe see the Nazis in the beginning, until it was too late. 75 million people died more than 80 years ago to defeat this cancer, it cannot be that all that sacrifice was in vain. I do what I can, from wherever I can, to collaborate in spreading that message.
Who let you out of the mental facility? Hope you find your way back safely. 🙏
No doubt we’ll all be keeping a close eye on Elon for any more stupid salutes. We all know that there are many types of intelligence. Elon is a genius at many things, and an idiot at others. So are my other autistic friends. And non autistic…
All Tesla fans would have face-palmed when he did that. But he’s not a Nazi!!
@@zaksampson8445 Apparently the only one with a mental problem is you, by your comment. Bye
Imagine the auto-pilot cameras get dirty by water and dirt on the highway and you crash sitting on the back seat.
That will not happen - worst case the car will stop self-driving and demand that you take over. In the case of cybercab, the unit will drive for a clean up long before the issue is serious.
if only quality control was better..
Move on.
If only that stupid lie wasn't repeated so often.
Tesals driving themselves from the assembly line to the loading area is FSD for real, saving humans work and time. Wake up Wall Street guys. Jeannine
yep cars that will go to the outbound lot, without paying 30-50 other people to drive to the outbound just to come back again.
how long before cars are driving themselves to the customer day 1, without needing a courier/transporter lol
There will be a time when your car warns you that there's a human driver around. Jeannine
1:14 The Fremont factory is not in, or even near LA. It's a good 6-7 hour drive from LA, near San Francisco. Also, we have Waymo here in LA (and SF). We have been driven around autonomously for about 6 months here in LA (longer in SF). It is a very odd but great experience. I will also add, my M3-FSD is a much better experience than Waymo. I think that 12 months from now, we'll have it solved and the California/Texas launch will be in full swing. I can hardly wait. Thanks for the great channel.
Just around the corner 😉
Yep I built a car and paid for FSD back in 2019 as I believe in it. However I agree we should be refunded until legislation locally catches up with the tech
That is cool. I've wonder how long it will be until they just deliver themselves straight to customers (who live close enough) direct from the factory. Imagine taking delivery within a couple of hours of the car coming off of the production line!
I really need to get a Model 3 somehow!!!
Is so cooool ! I can’t wait for it !!! Mega !
Well, in SF cars (not Tesla’s) drive them self for a few years, now. Further, the use of only cameras is a big problem think about fog for example. I would like something that is better then my eyes like radar.
What you would like though, has been proven not to be necessary. Eyes have done a pretty good job so far. Cameras are just the same (even better actually as computer reaction times are far quicker than us meat bags) People can drive in the fog, and so do Tesla's using todays FSD V.13 (plenty of videos out there to watch) Both just drive slower. Also, I believe Fog still hinders Radar and Lidar so would just be another layer of conflicting data.
Well done on getting hold of the extra B roll of the internal Tesla self driving clips Will. I've not seen that anywhere else. 👍
I didn’t see this asked in the comments- any idea what that tunnel with all the lights does? At about 2:40 the car drives through it. My guess is it must be some kind of QA step? But then that’s a strange place to check quality so far into the drive.
I would have to agree. What if it rained that day?
@@geirmyrvagnes8718 Что бы произошло, если бы в тот день у вас был понос?
Hmm? I drove my uncle's 2024 Tesla Model Y 2 weeks ago that was up to date at that time with the latest FSD update. I had the car drive me from a restaurant back to my house, a distance of about 3 miles on secondary and primary city streets. The car immediately made a couple of fairly significant mistakes: It pulled out of the driveway of the restaurant right in front of a rapidly approaching car (causing some road rage in the form of 6 or 7 honks), it cross over three lanes suddenly and crossing solid white no passing lines, it turned into a double yellow line do not cross zone, and it merged into a second lane bypassing the first lane when turning right, like a school bus driver. If I was a driving ed instructor I would have given Tesla an "F" on the driving test and would have sent it back to the learning lab. The scary thing is that my uncle, a 97 year old, is totally dependent on the FSD software for his daily driving. I think that I better stay off the sidewalks!
Don't worry. The fanboys will say that it's safer than a human. Musk will get the laws watered down and then dump this on people in the USA. Then we'll find out what the unintended consequences are.
If that were true the hundreds of thousands if not millions of Tesla's on FSD would be
seriously overrepresented in accident stats and youtube would be full of it.
They are not.
Wow how about self delivery from the factory to your door !!!!
Nice idea! No destination fee! 🎉
I used to train the guys driving cars off-on boats in the harbor, in total there are thousands of people doing that around the world - huge savings for Tesla to do it this way
1:07 It's like a Cybertruck birthing Cybertrucks!
The FREMONT factory is not in LA, but in northern Ca on San Francisco Bay
across the bay from SF 500miles north of LA.
!
I think self driving delivery will happen. but tesla will need to employ workers at super chargers to plug these vehicles in, unless the use optimus.
No one minds attwmpts to solve self driving. Its the fraud that bothers people.
It’s the spelling that bothers me
@TeslaJigsaw one letter. Dont be a grammer-elon
You should attwmpts to spell. Fool.
@@flattire707 you know w is beside e on querty.
What I really want to see is two or more Teslas racing on a track with humans driving other cars.
How come we don't do this in giga Texas
It only 15 miles to the rail head .
Save all those car transport trucks?
Public roads need some more paperwork to be signed.
Fremont isn't LA.
Cool vid, Fremont is not in La but the SF bay area.
Doh! I knew that 🤦♂️
@@TeslaJigsaw Lol, it happens.
Tesla isn’t late to roll out because they don’t want China EV companies to copy to early in the game.😂😂😂
Nice one FSD yes yes yes absolutely fantastic thanks Will.
🍻
I thought they would already be doing this.
Every. Vehicle. Demonstrates capability in all Teslas... and the near zero incremental cost (or now negative cost) of installing this hardware and software in every vehicle.
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
Great - it would be even cooler to order your car online and have it come to your home by itself )))) crazy
In two years
Good job, Ellie.
?
Fremont is not in LA.
Yeah, I know now 🤦♂️
What are fine fascinating is as we all go yay for automation that is someone's job that's gone. That Driver no longer has a job.
As a CNC machinist, I have almost been killed twice from motherboard crashes. But don't worry, the insurance companies have caps on how much your life is if you get killed by a computer, so Tesla won't have to pay out too much.
And still much, much, less likely than being killed by some fool who shouldn't be behind the wheel at all
This computer scares me less than a 16 year old in Dads 5.0 mustang, all driving is dangerous.
I’m so glad that humans never make driving mistakes. Good thing no one is on their phones or intoxicated. Could the motherboard crash? Sure…I’ll take that risk over the risk of human drivers. Just go drive a Tesla…it’s a different experience.
I know… you hate Elon cause he switched teams so you must post anti-Tesla propaganda. Objectivity is hard…
The people making the cars will make them cheap enough to show you how little your life is really worth.
The future for hardware 3 owners still remains uncertain.
LFG!!!!
2:08 - That's a model 3, not a Model Y.
Fremont is hundreds of miles from LA.
Yeah, it's a big place America.. whoops!
👋 7:57 GREAT TIMES AHEAD ,WILL 🤯🥶⚡️⚡️⚡️
you do realize this is just smart summon right
love this !
If you don't like driving then Call a Taxi, Much, Much More Safe !
"Freemont factory in LA" lol come on now
Yeah, F’d up with that one! 🤦♂️
@TeslaJigsaw all good, it was funny haha
Soon they will keep going strait to the home of the person who ordered it.
Nobody wants them,so?
@@BrunoHeggli-zp3nl The booking in Chian for the new model Y is 100.000+, and not all in the west are bots and idiots believing what ever the new thing MSM says.
I have and love my Tesla. What’s sad is having an owner whose Einstein and Hitler inhabiting the same body.
You literally believe he’s as bad as Hitler? You are broken Sir
Boring...
Fuel cells catalysts and membranes , there anode and cathodes are becoming small, very cost effective very efficient the new fuel cells SOFC Solide oxide have no need for expensive metals and the newer maganese oxide catalysts, super clean and very high efficiency, coming soon the day where a tank canister the size of a large coke bottle full of cheap green hydrogen will take your fuel cell car 500 miles, hydrogen refillable tank canisters sold at convience store stands, this will be the infrastructure, no need for those ugly EV charging stations all around cities ect, hydrogen fuel cell top ups just like phones or like connecting ones BBQ propane grill except it will be with hydrogen with no toxins, very simple super safe, they already exist, they already make 5 types of hydrogen canister types, lite carbon fiber tanks 5 times stronger than steel, hydrogen car tanks canisters made for high car impact, this is coming, the new perovskite solar cells have become much more cost efficient by 30% in making green hydrogen and better storage than solar cells to battery storage or just plan electricity, this is a game changer in the solar cell green hydrogen revolution, hydrogen is realy safe in comparison to gazoline, gazoline needs 1% to 3% oxygen concentrations to explode, hydrogen needs 18% to 59% making it safer! hydrogen dispersis fast onto air, it`s a very lite element, making it safe! around the world many gazoline cars explode in car accidents, lithium battery explosion fires, many remember the hydrogen Hindenburg Zepplin explosion, however the material coating it was made of was the reason for the horrible fire and not the hydrogen fuel, there has not been a hydrogen fire or explosion connection since then, i would say hydrogen is the safest of fuels!
Lithium is a very toxic element metal, unlike gold or silver, not many countries want to mine it, 98% of lithium is not recycled and goes in to land fills or dumps, causing even worst toxins in peoples water canals and ocean, it is way cheaper to mine lithium than recycle it, the huge amount of lithium used to make just one lithium car is not sustainable for all cars, lithium is a water guzzling toxic element metal, it takes 1000 gallons of clean water turned very toxic , just to mine or build one lithium car(just one)this is just lithium and not including cobalt which is another of many other real toxic element metals in the build of a lithium toxic car ( just horrible) on top of this, most lithium cars are still connected to the oil and coal grids!
Because of one photo taken in a split moment ? You might wanna see the photos of him at the memorial in Germany last year for the Jews, that isn't something a National Socialist would do.
I don't understand what the big deal is. It still can't do proper traffic like Elon promised in 2017, and it never will.
It's a good safety compliment to a driver, that's it.
Have you tried FSD V.13?
Less insane........................ :=)
Not when he has started going on about humanoid robots in the meantime. 😆
Come on. These cars navigate automatically in a well-known environment: no rain, snow, pedestrians, very few traffic signs, and almost no traffic. Is it impressive? Yes. Is it close to real self-driving? Not really. Tesla's current "full self-driving" requires the driver to have hands on the steering wheel to take over if necessary, and it requires human intervention every 13 miles. Every now and then, it kills someone when it leaves the road, crashes into a median divider, crashes into an emergency vehicle or traffic accident ahead, etc. It doesn't work in snow, rain, iced roads, fog, etc. It's very far from real self-driving with no steering wheel, where you can read a book or work while it drives you wherever you want to go.
Being an uncritical Tesla fan is nice, but sometimes, one needs to face reality.
So just because it's not close to FSD yet, we should hate it always and be pessimistic?
@firstclass000 We should be realistic. Reliable self-driving is a complex problem, and we're still far from reaching the goal. That's a fact. Opinions differ on whether it's even possible to get to real self-driving using today's tech. One of the problems is the fact that the neural networks we use sometimes produce wildly incorrect results. In the case of LLMs, it's known as "hallucination." It seems that better training of the neural networks can improve the result, but the phenomenon appears inevitable and an innate limitation of the technology used. It's plausible that until some breakthrough in the underlying theory occurs, our AI tools, including self-driving systems, will make severe mistakes occasionally.
Is it good enough as an answer?
@ maybe not we won't have FSD anytime soon but at least good enough self-driving in the meantime
@firstclass000 People aren't good at being attentive for prolonged periods of time while not really driving, because so far everything was fine. Predictably, they start playing with their phones, eating, watching movies, and some even climb into the back seat(!). Then it's just a tragedy waiting to happen, as you might have seen in multiple crash reports.
Don't get me wrong. The current self-driving is a great piece of tech, a cool gadget, and I love to try it out. But that's about it.
That should have been the case for years but okay
Samn i have been dtiving cars on and off freightliners .. better grow older fast enough before tesla ll take my job
Nice remminiscant headlights, lacking in innovation
The Highlander is here to support your brother😊 any friend of Brian. White is a friend of mine.😊
Awesome thank you!
Game over for Tesla!The end!
How ? The tech is better, the cars coming are cheaper and the competition is actually losing wheels and breaks.
I love “Well Shuut up! “ To the haters and professional haters!! 😂😂😂 thanks sir for expressing my sentiment. ;)
Man, let's for forget Tesla... Elon screwed it completely. They lost their focus and drive.
What a shame... Such a magnificent enterprise.
wow
👍
How about you order online, and next day it arrive in front your house.
👍🏻🙏🏻❤️
You get it. 🇦🇺
The "haters" and the "naysayers", huh? Who was it that promised in 2016 that a Tesla would travel coast-to-coast on its own the following year? And every single year since?
Good video. 👍🏼
Thanks 👍
That is relatively easy to achieve. Real world edge cases are where it will struggle
Which is exactly what they have been collecting data on for years.
And therefore be so much better at avoiding than a human who sees only a handful of edge cases in a lifetime.
@@thosoz3431 And what size data set will that need and what level of processing, memory size to cover these edge cases? For instance, when I come over a bridge and the weather is rough, I know to expect strong side or other winds. When going around a bend, I might notice shade covering a section so there might be ice in that area as the sun has not melted it, but has on the rest of the road. In Wales I might see a large white blob (sheep) at one side of the road and on the other a small white blob (lamb). I know that there is a good chance one will run to the other right in from of the car, or indeed run in to the middle of the road (happened more than once). Found a 1 ton hay bale in the middle of a lane on a roundabout, that I believe FSd would have handled okay.
Thanks Will 😉
No problem 👍
I recently had my first ride in a Tesla with FSD. I'm really impressed by the technology. However my ride included one dangerous mistake, when the car began to cross a clearly marked forbidden zone to merge into a busy freeway rather than continue up the ramp to the area where merging was legal. My friend (the driver) took over and steered the car back to the ramp. The incident was over before I had a chance to be scared.
Far from underplaying the skill it takes to build a self-driving car, I think an enormous amount of work has gone into it. They're just not there yet.
But with the enormous rates of improvements, those edge cases will soon disappear
@ The edge cases will disappear, but how soon is still an open question.
In the short term, uses like this, and the promised driverless taxis in Austin are the way to go. It looks as if the Las Vegas loop is finally going to start testing driver assistance features this year, so they’ll likely be moving to driverless sooner or later.
In these cases Tesla (or TBC) will have liability for any accidents.
Releasing unsupervised FSD to vehicle owners still has the question of who will have liability in an accident. There will be accidents. Even activities that are safe (like flying) have accidents.
@@kevinbailey8827However, right now FSD is a safer driver than an increasing percentage of human drivers.
@@svenhodaka9145 That's a vague statement. Did it recently go from safer than 1% of human drivers to safer than 2%?
And how is that data collected and processed? In the case I experienced, the human driver took control of the vehicle before any accident, so does that count an a dangerous event or does it not get counted at all?
Who is claiming that FSD is safer? Tesla? That's like Big Tobacco claiming that cigarettes are beneficial for your health or Listerine claiming to prevent colds. I'd like to see some independent data?
Hw3 fsd supervised is awesome.
It’s so important to note that “solving autonomous (whatever)”, even general navigation, is not a “once and for all” venture. Just look at what happened with DeepSeek Ri blasting open AI by undercutting cost of entry by 95%. And then a day later alibaba popooing on R1 with their new model.
The only advantage that horrible human has is that he made the smart move to start early and try to gain as much as possible before the bubble pops. He is desperate. Mark my words that as soon as it’s “solved”, it’s undercut by cheaper more efficient models and methods. It’s ahead of the curve but ultimately that will cause it to be left in the dust. Just like Kodak.
I’m not saying it’s bad but… it’s bad. Using only cameras is slightly dangerous… people lost theirs lives because cameras didn’t saw what they supposed to… I know that in the end actual person is responsible for save driving but it could be prevented just using camera+radar:/ don’t get me wrong I do love Tesla but this policy is weird…
Actual people would also be killed by cars with radar, lidar or whatever type of sensor you use. Including actual human drivers.
How many of the "Drill Baby Drill" voter block are going to buy an EV?
All of them, for practical purposes. About 90 % of new cars sold are BEV now around here, so any voter block you can think of buys EVs.
You do know that producing oil in the US is better than shipping it from abroad, as it now have to meat standards for pollution and save on shipping. And you use it for other things than gas. Less money going out and less money supporting terror and war.
We can't live in a completely oil free world, but we can slowly turn it down, bur for that we need to control production of it. It don't matter that countries build up a stockpile and every time there is a thing that is a threat they flood the marked with cheap oil or buy up the new thing.
Lots of us. I am all for drilling. I own two Teslas. MAGA all the way.
Look, this looks exciting, but the reality is that this is nothing really new, and I bet that there is a bunch of customized programming to make this possible for just this specific route. I bet that many Chinese competitors and other established can do the same. Meanwhile, here in Europe my full FSD car cannot even merge lanes.
è meglio la moto guzzi
Or maybe like with the Optimus robots, they are controlled by a human from a distance. 😅
I will never buy one of these. They’re a death wish. Especially since they can drive themselves. Why would you want to do that?
Thats what they always say. In the early 1900s, people resisted cars, saying they were dangerous, unreliable, and unnecessary. Some believed horses were safer and that automobiles would never replace them. Now, cars are essential. Even early elevators scared people, and when automatic ones were introduced, no one trusted them without an operator. Today, no one thinks twice about stepping into one.
You must be new here. Welcome!
People said the same about Airbags, seat belts and even not being able to drive drunk.....
The one thing humans have, that the AI in a Tesla doesn't, is intuition. I get feelings all the time that a driver is going to do something stupid and modify my behavior accordingly.
Luckily the Tesla can kind of simulate intuition by its training on human data plus it's much faster than a human reflex speed.
Eventually intuition won't be needed as all cars will self drive and will behave predictably.... unlike we humans. Then self driving won't be as much of a challenge as it is with stupid drivers being the wheel.
So by the time it’s more than capable, its compute power will be just ticking over with ease! That’s when inference compute becomes the next wave of income and usefulness. Using its redundant capabilities on other tasks
Arguably FSD is all intuition. It is all "I have seen something like this before, I bet this is what will happen and I should do that." There is no supernatural precognition type of intuition, so it is all based on subtle clues that you may not be able to even explain, but an AI that has "driven" much longer distances under more varied conditions than any human probably has a lot of it.
If an Al can process
thousands of real-world driving scenarios
analyze human tendencies, and predict
dangerous behaviors with precision, it might
not "sense" that a driver will do something
stupid-it will know based on probabilities.
"if you havent done something similarly amazing, you're not allowed to criticize tesla for failing to deliver their $15,000 software package for over 10 years, shut up then!"
as amazing as what....failing to deliver?
this argument is invalid, makes no sense, lacks logic, cannot see itself and is overly absurd.
Mate, check chinese car videos, they are way more advanced than this.