Body Language Analyst Reacts to RARE Never Before Analyzed Scott Peterson Interrogation Tapes Ep. 37
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Patreon: / observeentertainment
Observe Merch Shop: teespring.com/...
Audible Trial Link: www.audibletria...
Subscribe: www.youtube.com...
Scott Peterson was found guilty nearly two decades ago. Many people are still in turmoil about the case, however, due to the lack of concrete evidence. Despite having already done two videos on Scott, I wanted to wrap everything up with one final super episode centered around not only the admitted evidence, but also the nonverbal communication from Scott's very first interview with the police from the very night of the incident.
MUSIC:
------------------------------
"Funky Souls" and "Elizabeth's Groove" by Amarià / amariamusique
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/Funky-Souls
Music promoted by Audio Library • Funky Souls - Amarià (...
------------------------------
Business Email: observe.contact@gmail.com
I recall this case as it was happening. As a result, we wound up with the Lacy Peterson Act, which makes the murder of a pregnant woman count as two murders instead of one. This was significant.
Oouga Hersharr so Chris watts killed 4 people
@@tommy69693 Since his wife was pregnant, according to the Lacey Peterson Act, yes, he did.
@@tommy69693 Guilty on all four counts, rightly so x
So about this Lacey Peterson act why is killing a pregnant woman considered two murders but a woman killing her baby in an abortion is not considered murder and it's okay??
@@rhondaphillips7664 That's because people can't seem to decide if pro-life or pro-choice is more appropriate. It's the inconsistency of government. However, when someone else kills the pregnant lady, they are taking two lives without informed consent of either. A pregnant lady aborting her baby is, at this time, considered a whole other matter. It is a touchy subject for many people and one I will not get into on a comment section because I don't wish to stir up more controversy. Thank you for your intelligent question, however. It is something to consider.
I’m more worried about an outside barn cat that I haven’t seen in a while than he seemed to be about his wife.
Ha! I am sitting waiting for mine to show up to eat like a sailor's wife gazing out to sea right now as we speak. It's getting dark come on kitty. 😍🐾
@@dragonclaws9367 did he/she come back?
😂
While I agree that he’s a piece of shit and clearly doesn’t give a shit about the search for his wife; I don’t agree that is is strange that he answers his phone during the search. In certain context, it would be suspicious but your comment didn’t present a context that is clear. What I mean is that during a search for a loved one, my phone would always be on me and I would answer my phone immediately hoping that there was news from someone that wasn’t necessarily at the search site.
and chris watts acted like his car was stolen "i just just want it back so badly like i want it now"
I had a neighbor that ended up killing his wife and let me tell you
He was so incredibly nice and kind, but to the point of where it was uncomfortable. It just seemed so off to me. No one is THAT nice.
Overacting psychopath
yup. covert narcs. something aint quite right but they're so good with their mask that they get by most people.
I actually do believe some people are very nice. But I bet psychopaths who are covering probably do it in a particular way that feels off. I genuinely care for most people, so I feel that of course there are people that are the same way. It's just a thought though. Do I have it wrong?
@@EpicRobloxTomboy oh yeah, but I feel there's a different vibe between someone who's really nice and someone who's suspiciously and oVERLY nice. It's just the feeling you get, it just feels off y'know? I guess it's just a gut feeling type of thing
Nice is a sort of manipulation. On one hand, we all do it at certain times because we are social creatures and getting along is pretty important, even as a means to survive. It's how people misuse it and even abuse others with the manipulation that really matters. I'm sure there's clues this neighbor gave you, probably on sort of a subconscious level that you picked up on and realized somehow that the nice words didn't match the behavior or the situation. I'd say good on you that you could see thru an act and taking a deeper dive into it can only serve you well in the future. A lot of people are fooled by just words and it's important to take in the totality of words, the context, and behavior - including body language and micro-expressions that don't register except on that subconscious level.
I feel he is so busy trying to not give himself away, he forgets to act like he cares.
That’s a *really* good description. Exactly how it seems.
Wow, what an awesome way to describe his demeanor!
I agree also. Such a great description. How people think they can lie and no one will notice is unreal. That’s why learning over the years about all the types of personalities people possess is so interesting.
Truee
i think this is a whole thing, similar with chris watts or jodi arias
Your merch should say “I’m uncomfortable nonverbally” 🤣
Yes! I would so buy that tshirt!
Oh 100% give me 5
Shut up and take my money. I just bought a schmeeda fam shirt from true crime loser. Love his channel and all the inside jokes we accumulate in the comment section over time.
omggggg that would easily become my fave shirt
Yassss! 👏🏽👏🏽
When Scott says he moved the mop bucket for her because,
“she *WAS* pregnant..”
... *THAT* is suspicious AF... she’s hardly been “missing” for 24 hours, & their baby isn’t due yet, so she should still *BE* pregnant. 🤨
That caught me off guard too! What a snake!
I have to say - that occasionally I speak about someone that is not with me, but I am describing an activity we did - I use the the term was. "Oh, she was so nice when we were setting up for the banquet." That doesn't mean I think she isn't nice now, or dead ... I am just describing a past event. Perhaps not proper English, but I am having a discussion, not giving a professional presentation.
@@Viewer92136 that makes sense, but I feel like saying someone was nice when setting up for the banquet, is using the adjective nice to praise the person during that time. Just like you could say she was such a bitch setting up for the banquet, but you could still be talking about your best friend who happened to be in a mood that day
Saying she was pregnant when she should still be pregnant strikes me as something different than describing someone’s affect at a certain point in time
Even after my mom passed, I still refer to her in the present tense
He is already over her and thinks of her in past tense. Very telling.
Please please, please do the Menendez brothers in court talking about their father's abuse.
Oooo yea...i forgot abt them!!! Good pick.
Yes!
Pretty please!
Literally about to ask him again the same thing!!
YESSSS! That case was so interesting! I always found them to be credible but I’m not an analyst! I just felt like the emotion was crazy deep
My dad's boss saw him driving on the freeway in the very early morning hours on his route from Modesto to Richmond. He called police, and they never followed up. I think he did it, but police got the timeline wrong. He killed her the night before, then dumped her in the very early morning, went back to clean up and stage the house, let the dog out. Then went back to the marina to get an alibi and receipt in case he was ever placed there to give a reason to be there. Nobody drives hours alone on Christmas eve to go fishing in a tiny boat in the bay in bad weather to only be there for 20 minutes! With no fish to show for it.
I agree.
I absolutely think this is what happened!
Brocchini: Did you buy bait?
Scott: Nope, I'm not a bait fisherman.
Brocchini: Did you troll?
Scott: Little bit. I mean a lot of, lot of the reason I went was just to get that boat in the water to see, you know ---
What about the people who saw her the day he went fishing? What about the people that rob the house across the street? And didn't they have a jailhouse call that they talked about killing her that magically disappeared???
@@theresabreaud he could've paid people so it would look like it was random robbers. Eyewitnesses aren't usually accurate people see want they want to see. Or someone that looked like her
Someone may have pointed this out already, but did anyone hear him talking in past tense saying she WAS pregnant? It’s something small but if he really had hope and believed his wife was alive and well I think most people would say she IS pregnant.
Yes I heard that and was like hmm hes talking in past tense he killed her
I think when he was talking about moving the mop and bucket for her, he said quickly “she’s 8 months pregnant”
He was never forthcoming with any information when she disappeared, it was like pulling teeth with him. The fact he was soaking wet when he came home from fishing proves what happens during the reenactment when they tried to throw a person out of the boat. The guy throwing the body out of the boat fell into the bay, which I'm guessing is what happened to him when he supposedly went fishing. What a sick man he is. RIP Lacy and Baby Conner. :(
@@feliciaanderson5205 he refers to her in the past tense more than just that time. He did that several times.
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 And so did others including her own mother.
So let me get this straight, Scott Peterson could not have lifted his wife to move her to his truck but a homeless man could carry her for hours? Please, his lawyers were grasping for straws!
And, Scott was going to haul a 100 pound Stergon UP OUT OF THE WATER AND INTO THE BOAT, but he couldn't lift his wife into the truck! 😁
So how did the burglars get the long list of items home. Todd didn't carry them home on his bicycle. Do some research before speaking.
@@donnagarside8520 Laci was 153 lbs. Then there were alleged anchors weighing at least 32 lbs which is not even close to enough to submerge 153 lb body.
@@donnagarside8520 lol! I bet even a strong swimmer would have a hard time keeping their head above water if they had that weight strapped onto their limbs! LMAO!
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 People aren't swimming when they're dead Renee. When people drown it's because of suffocation and eventually their lungs fill with water. When people are dead their lungs are filled with oxygen.
Even after a body is submerged, the natural process of decay causes a build of gases causing them to float.
You're welcome.
He did not tell Laci about the affair and it wasn't any of Laci's friends who knew about it. It was Ambers friend who found out Scott was married, and she told him that if he didn't tell Amber the truth, she would tell Amber herself. So he was forced to tell Amber he had been married, but he lied and said "He had lost his wife", thus lessening her suspicion and gaining her sympathy. He did not elaborate and Amber didn't like to ask how he had lost his wife. This was 10 days before Laci went missing.......if Laci had known he was having an affair, for sure she would have told her family. Her sisters and her mother confirmed that. And any woman would know that Laci would not be calmly preparing for Xmas, in late pregnancy, if that bombshell had been dropped on her.
This clarified a bunch of my questions, thank you
Exactly. Thanks for refreshing my memory about this. And you're right, Lacy would NOT have been perfectly fine with Scott admitting to the affair. That's just bullshit. NO woman, especially a pregnant woman, would be alright with her partner having an affair. SMH
@@kristipatterson9952 For sure. When I was 8 months pregnant I found out my ex was having several affairs - short lived flings, and I can tell you there was Hell to pay. I threw a large ashtray at his head after catching him in a motel room with a teenage girl.
@@juanitarichards1074 I'm so sorry you went through this. Hugs!
@@juanitarichards1074 I'm glad he's your ex. You deserve better
One of the best true crimes channels on YT hats off bro
Ironic since he took off his hat for this video😢
@@pandafluff9569 was just about to comment this
@@notmyrrodrick4387 same haha 😂
@@pandafluff9569 Yeah, oops
You should really look up channels like Stephanie Harlowe, she covers stories amazing
Can you imagine being one of the fishermen, chatted and laughed with a random guy at the bay. And later found out he possibly just killed and dumped his wife from his boat. Makes me wonder how many random people we run into are uncaught killers.
The same ones who didn't see a body in the boat?
Wow. That's heavy dude....
There's only one person that you can ever really trust - yourself.
Also did he say "she WAS pregnant" not "she IS pregnant" makes him look pretty suspicious. Like he knew something that happened
Detective Grogan testified that nearly everyone including her own mother referred to Laci in past tense.
This case is soooo clear Idk if I saw any other like this one! That clear who's 99% guilty even if he wasn't, Scott is an a$$hole
@@anonymousxyzxpaq3793
He's not guilty
@@aok4418 pls explain why u think that
@@anonymousxyzxpaq3793 Many reasons really. Fact is, there was no real evidence to support him being guilty. The investigation was botched. Police did a horrible job and ignored everything that led away from Scott Peterson.
Sorry just busy
He never told Laci about Amber. Laci was a very expressive person and she would have told at least one of her close friends and her mother. No way did Scott tell Laci.
Unless he only felt the need to tell her the truth cause he was going to kill her anyways. I would love to know if these "masks" these psychopaths have on come off only when they know that person won't be alive to tell anyone. Cause if they can snap and start murdering, there has to be some sort of taking off of the mask in between.
I think she died because she figured it out and called him out.
To be fair we didn’t know her . Maybe she was embarrassed to be about to have a baby and her husband is cheating on her . Sometimes people keep things like that away from their family and friends at first . But he more than likely didn’t tell her I agree
I agree. I am an extreme introvert and would not tell my mama jack, though, as she makes me nervous and I would be embarrassed I think. But I feel that, unless you are a total loner and possibly a real recluse, females in particular talk through problems with at least one other person outside their marriage for “perspective.” It’s very uncommon to have a problem so huge and tell absolutely NO ONE. I’m not saying it never happens, but it’s extremely uncommon. I hardly ever socialize and spend time at home almost always and I STILL have a gal pal I call to talk things through with And she does the same. We quiet and closed off women who are less expressive and connected STILL have a tiny inner circle where we express these things.
Wrong!
GERAGOS: Detective, she specifically told you that Ron, that Laci did not like Ron Grantski, as she called him, said Sharon's boyfriend, correct?
GROGAN: That's what she said.
GERAGOS: She said Laci doesn't like him. She didn't want her mother or he to know about the affair at all. Isn't that what she told you?
GROGAN: That's what she told me.
GERAGOS: She said that, said Laci was very adamant about that. That's why he protected that, instead of being up front and that kind of thing; is that correct?
GROGAN: That's what she said.
GERAGOS: She said that Scott said that Laci was extremely, or very pissed off. That's what he told her, right?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And that the, and they were going to get through it, but that she was, Laci was upset, right?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And she said that Scott said that Laci had insisted they not tell the parents about it, correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's what Ann said.
GERAGOS: And you said that Laci was pissed off, but they had been through it before, correct? And said her answer was, right, she was not happy. But he said, you know, they talked it over, you know. They were going to, going to get through it. They were looking forward to Conner being born. She went on. It was kind of putting it on the back burner; is that correct?
When someone is murdered it’s the big things the murder takes away - the babies, the career progression, you know, life milestones. But it’s also the little things. Lacey will never get to watch Martha Stewart again. She’ll never get to eat her favorite meal, or fall into and savor the feeling of soft, clean sheets after a long, hard day. It gets me angry...
💔💔💔
Or hold her precious baby boy in her arms.
Yep it's everything
I know this isn't recent , but can you review carole baskins interviews after her husband's 'disappearance ' ? Alot of us seem to think she killed him and wondering if you can decipher her body language!
He had one on her, but it seems he removed it.
The Peterson case is from 2002/2003, so recent is a non-issue.
I'd love to see this!
Derek van schaik did that one.
I feel like Carole's brother in the local police force helped her with her husband some how.
I really, really wish you'd do one of someone being truthful in an interrogation. Put it side by side with one like this, where he isn't being honest. That would be fabulous!
Watch JCS Criminal Psychology. They analyse interrogation videos of the guilty and innocent.
Like someone who has been convicted & later cleared. That would be very interesting. To see the interrogation, the person and the detectives body language.
Hi Logan,
Will you PLEASE take a look at the body language of the adoptive parents whose two little boys, age 3 and 4, went missing? PLEASE? the boys were reported missing on 12/21/20, in California City, California. I don't know if I can post a link, but the names of the boys are Orrin and Orson West. The 13 minute long interview is all over RUclips, so I don't think it will be difficult to find.
Thanks so much for considering. It's really important.
Bumping this because yes!
@@PanicattheDiscourse Thanks, and I think it's really important. There seems like there are so many lies that I am hearing from the interview, and I'd love for Logan to break it down.
Thanks, Danielle!
They’re 100% guilty. Those boys were never even at that house in Cal City!
@@IratePuffin I agree. I just hope those precious little boys are found soon, so they can be put to rest.
Bump!!
Observe and JCS psychology are my favorite
I watch his “legend of Jeff” video to relax lol
Agree 🙌
Totally agree !!
JCS >>>>>> no other like him
@@Em99957 Oooo, I've never heard of this channel. I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the recommendation!
He was so confident she would never be found, he hadn't a worry in the world. However, footage of him simply getting the mail sealed it for me. If your wife was abducted or "missing" you would be frantically awaiting every phone call and mail delivery (for a ransom note or post card??) not casually talking on the phone while getting the mail ... then placing it under your arm!! without even glancing at it. That would never happen if she were really actually "missing." You would be rifling through it like a lunatic.
@ellie No one would be that casual unless they didn't give a shit.
@@eemmons6018 could just be shut off, detached from the pain reality of it all :- Not necess arily c@su@l at all :-When folk are in shock, severe pain, they can subconsciously shut down
@ellie yes folk in shock or extreme sdness detach in order to be able to go on
So many clues it's mindboggling how stupid this filth was; and yet so many stupid still think with all of his bungling and apathy and cheating and lying that in Paris, when there was not looking sad that his wife and child were missing; and still they this worthless POS, and it's unbelievable. We have the public school system to blame for these zombies who have no brain and cannot connect the dots about anything; let alone this high profile, highly traumatic double murder case.
Thank God he was guilty after 5 and a half months of trial. Think of That.
I agree, He was convinced that she would not be found. He didn't do a very good job. It's peculiar that the remains of Laci & Connor washed up on the beach, not far where he was suppose to be fishing. He was pulling a "Susan Smith" Crocodile tears, being dishonest; Lying to Amber about his being married. I would suggest that where he dumped her & Connor that investigators search the sea floor where the anchors were thrown down-- I would guess that he put her head, limbs in cement & make him sure that Laci & Connor wouldnt be found or discovered. Just some thoughts.
"I went fishing for sturgeon at 1 pm"
Me: guilty
Why?
@@calimango7926 because sturgeons typically stop biting around that time. Between 10 am to 1:30 pm is when they stop feeding. Early morning is the time to fish for sturgeon. So as an avid fisherwoman, that claim seems odd coming from a guy who is an avid fisherman.
Edit: and I mean early morning like 2 am to 9 am
@@calimango7926 not to mention the peak season for sturgeon is during spring
@@isolatedalien5696 interesting !!!
@@rachelciararose thank you! I'm full of useless information lol
He’s acting similarly to someone in a job interview. Prepared. Has an answer to every question. Almost like he’s trying to “do well”. Like in an interview, some questions are harder than others, therefore your confidence will fluctuate, just as he is displaying. Even if a pet of mine disappeared in my apartment, I’d show waayyy more concern than this guy is.
Quit acting like you read him just because you know the end result 😐
Anyone who’s concerned and knows the “truth” of what’s going on will have quick and straight forward answers as he did.
You’d also be quick to say he’s bluffing if he were to take some time in between answers.
That phone ring during Diane Sawyers interview said it all. Not even a flinch or head movement to the phone. Silence. He sat like stone. Guilty.
Or in shock, subconsciously giving up
Thanks, Logan.
Scott Peterson is a total liar. NO wife/partner would be "okay" with Scott having an affair, especially with a baby coming along in a couple of months. That's just a total lie on Scott's part.
Again, thanks for the video. I love listening to you explain everything.
I believe there are couples that would be ok with that, for example, swingers or open marriage types, however, this couple obviously is NOT one of them. But they do exist, I’ve been approached by far too many of them in my life.
I didnt interpret that as him meaning she was fine with it, just that she was surprisingly not angry.
Scott never said Laci was okay with the affair. Where is he even getting this information.
But she did know about it.
GERAGOS: Detective, she specifically told you that Ron, that Laci did not like Ron Grantski, as she called him, said Sharon's boyfriend, correct?
GROGAN: That's what she said.
GERAGOS: She said Laci doesn't like him. She didn't want her mother or he to know about the affair at all. Isn't that what she told you?
GROGAN: That's what she told me.
GERAGOS: She said that, said Laci was very adamant about that. That's why he protected that, instead of being up front and that kind of thing; is that correct?
GROGAN: That's what she said.
GERAGOS: She said that Scott said that Laci was extremely, or very pissed off. That's what he told her, right?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And that the, and they were going to get through it, but that she was, Laci was upset, right?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And she said that Scott said that Laci had insisted they not tell the parents about it, correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's what Ann said.
GERAGOS: And you said that Laci was pissed off, but they had been through it before, correct? And said her answer was, right, she was not happy. But he said, you know, they talked it over, you know. They were going to, going to get through it. They were looking forward to Conner being born. She went on. It was kind of putting it on the back burner; is that correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's what she said.
FYI
Detective Hendee testified in court that he wanted to attempt a reenactment of a weighted body being dumped out of the boat, but neither the police nor prosecution ever tried. Odd that he believes the defense must disprove something the State cannot.
This guy doesn't know the facts.
He's a phony. Body language is as about as useless as a polygraph.
@@ac-fp9lx I agree. Scott never said that.
@@aok4418 Scott DID say she was okay with Amber. In fact, he says it more than once, right here;
ruclips.net/video/KDwpIcLv0OQ/видео.html
The exact moment he says it is at, 18:40 give or take. I love how it's okay for you to lie about the facts, but, when I present the true facts you have the nerve to call me a liar. You truly are one effed up dude!
I just dropped everything to watch this - I’m such a fan of this channel!!
I don't care if there isn't enough "evidence" he did it. He absolutely did it. There's alot of little slip ups that adds up and makes him look guilty without it being incredibly obvious.
And this is why hundreds of innocent people are put behind bars every year
@@ac-fp9lx It deeply saddens me that someone could say “I don’t care if there isn’t enough evidence.” This is why a potentially innocent man has been in prison for over 10 years.
Quit buying into the Peterson propaganda. If there wasn't enough evidence, it would've never gone to trial. Period.
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 Really? Say that about the West Memphis 3. Almost no evidence and it went to trial. I think Scott is guilty but your point is incorrect - cases can go to trial with little or no evidence.
@@MsSilverTulip no, before any case goes to trial, there's a hearing to look at the evidence gathered, to decide if there's enough to be weighed by a jury. If there's no evidence, it doesn't go to trial. You need to read up on how our justice system works before you go spreading misinformation.
I hope they picked up that Scott used the past tense when referring to his wife 'she WAS pregnant' x
Dude wtf freaky...
I always get chills about things like this. Like Watts saying how "they were good girls" or "shannan was a great wife" even the day after the "disappearance". That tips me off automatically. If my wife were missing I wouldn't even fathom her death yet. I would be holding onto the possibility of her coming home at any time.
I just caught that too. When he was talking about her mopping and the mop bucket
Yup, that jumped out at me too. This was the most recent interview after someone ELSE reported her missing, AFTER he calmly took a shower and changed, regardless of the weird circumstances regarding the state of the house. So, this is pretty much near Midnight, of the same day that he 'discovered' that she was missing and he's ALREADY saying "Was"???! Yikes!
Well he went to prison for her murder so like.....yeah probably
The detective trusted his gut feeling despite there being nothing obvious in Scotts demeanour. Many investigations start off with a hunch in an experienced detective or even a young cop. I remember when Peter Sutcliffe in Britain was interviewed in his home by two young cops and one of them got a bad feeling about him. He fit all the criteria of the kind of suspect they were looking for, and that young cop went to his superiors with a report and his suspicions. The poor guy was rubbished and ridiculed and even demoted to desk duty for his "presumption". Sutcliffe went on killing for a few more years......it turned out that young cops gut feeling was right. We all get that gut feeling sometimes. We know when someone is lying to us but we can't say why. I get a picture in my head of seemingly unrelated events but somehow the puzzle pieces come together and I can connect the events.....it gives a starting point to investigate.
H
OK, cool so we should just allow our justice system to be run on the feelings of the people investigating a crime? I'm sure nothing bad could happen there. To be fair, I'm just saying this in a reductio ad absurdum and I actually do know what you mean.
We are not talking about emotional feelings here but gut feelings, which we all have. Those gut feelings in investigators give them ideas where to look further for EVIDENCE. EG. A 3 year old boy was abducted off a street, ripped away from the older brother who was holding his hand and hustled into a car and driven off at speed. Cops were called and rushed to the scene. One cop had a hunch where the abdcutor might have taken the child and proceeded to a nearby park which was often used as a lovers lane. He found the car there with the offender and the naked crying 3 year old in the front seat. Was that cop supposed to ignore his gut feeling?
@@juanitarichards1074 Al Brocchini was a liar and a horrible detective. His actions had already caused one mistrial and under proper judge, it would have happened in this trial too.
His efforts were malicious and dishonest. He withheld exculpatory evidence and left it out of his report. He offered up lies about Martha Stewart airing, he was involved in tapering with the alleged hair evidence, he claimed circles were on the trailer from concrete dust with were actually more like rectangular shapes from cement bags, Police lied to family and friends saying Scott had purchased life insurance on Laci after she became pregnant. The police suggested to Scott's employer that he may be embezzling and an internal audit was done. No improprieties were found.
He failed to investigate further when Merlin tracked Laci's scent near the Gallo Winery not far from where the stolen items from Medina home. There are plenty more examples.
@@aok4418 Peterson is guilty and the only living being with a motive. How did he come to tell Amber that he had lost his wife 10 days before she went missing? And the lies he told Amber......about not being married, about being in Paris and even calling her from the candle light vigil to tell that lie.......he lied so easily, they just tripped off his tongue. It's obvious to everyone except halfwits - and psychopaths just like him, that he is guilty.
If it wasn't Scott, who would murder Lacey and go to the trouble of disposing her body in the Bay? I have wondered many times about that.
Yep. Burglar would just have let her body lay. Why increase risk of getting caught by hiding her body over and hours drive away?
Suspish for sure. Maybe the murderer followed him and dumped her body in the Bay to make him look bad? *facetious*
Had Scott done his research he would have realized the gasses in her body made the baby come forth and not long after that Lacy followed...The fact that he put her in a storage bin lets me also know Scott was a ride by the seat of his pants type of guy....get it done and over with...So very sad...
@@angelahagerman5693, I didn't hear that he put her in a storage bin.
@@christinaroche9616 because he didn’t
He made home made anchors in the storage unit which cops found evidence of
The concrete anchors were put on her arms/legs etc to weigh her down
Her limbs detached from her body and the baby discharged from her body and all washed up on shore
His biggest non verbal is that serial killer jacket
Huh?🤔
LoL.
Lol
They all wear that coat. I wonder why
My uncle has that very same coat but it's all stained up for some reason. I pointed that out and he was confused why it was a creepy jacket 😂 he also has the serial killer posture and walk
Anyone innocent would be losing their mind that the interviewer wasn't holding him back from searching for his pregnant wife
I noticed that during his trial too...he never cried or anything
@@CAMarg-zs1xq This is not me defending Scott at all! The saying, "Everyone handles grief differently. " Is pretty accurate and that's why I think we can't quite judge his lack of emotion in certain times. But during the this moment not even 24 hours after his pregnant wife has gone missing, Suspish. Hard core.
@@CAMarg-zs1xq basing someone's guilt based demeanor is ridiculous. Studies have been done where people are right about 54% of the time. It really doesn't mean much.
Ask the police why they didn't search for his pregnant wife?
This irresponsible and incompetent tunnel vision may well have cost Laci and Conner their lives. People who reported sightings were not even called back. Many of them had to call their information in multiple times.
Within a 1 mile radius of Laci’s house there were 26 sightings.
Detective Grogan testified.
"Laci sightings were not a priority."
pwc-sii.com/Research/sightings/sightings.htm
pwc-sii.com/Research/sightings/Walk.htm
@@aok4418 I literally just made an observation about how he didn't show any emotion at trial...where did you get the fact that I based guilt or innocence on that? Simply stated that I noticed a lack of emotion during the trial 🙄🙄🙄
I really like it when you delve into the facts behind a case before you analyze nonverbals. Please do this more! It's very nice
An HOUR long video? I must be blessed! This lifted my spirits today so much, thank you!!
It was so interesting i didn't even notice it was that long
The fact that when talking about her the night she disappears he says "she was" not "she is". If that's not a dead give away idk what is.
I love that you have proved why everyone has always had a gut feeling he murdered Laci and Conner 💔 may they RIP
"I find that to be trash" "Cover his own ass" I did *not* expect you to come for him this hard, holy hell--
Lol if you think that is bad definitely watch this Olivia Jade video. He goes hard
As someone from Modesto I think that his timeline of when he went fishing/where he went fishing is sketchy in the first place. We are approximately two hours from the bay area, and most people leave really early in the morning to go ocean fishing, then are out basically all day. For just doing a quick fishing trip there are tons of closer places he could have gone. Then learning he wasn't prepared to catch anything specifically it is super sketchy even to someone who has never fished a day in their life. We literally have a river that runs right through the middle of our area.
As someone from the East Bay, IDK why anyone would fish in the Bay?
The Bay was basically where the water from your toilet was flushed, until the late 50's..
And, all of the fish in the Bay is polluted, it is recommended that you eat no more than 2 fish a month from the Bay..
So, it never made sense to me that Scott Peterson would drive from Modesto to the Bay for fishing..
I live right next to the Bay, and I would NEVER fish in it..
I drive out to other places for that..
an hour analysis?! SAY NO MORE
She was excited for the video being so long instead of 20 mins.. nothing to do with the person in question. Lol
@@tp5090 haha thank you for understanding teagan! doesn’t matter the case or how blatantly guilty the subject may/may not seem to be 😂 i am fascinated by Observe content so beyond a typical 20 minute video is a real treat!
@Sammy Most medical professionals wouldn't make that determination based on someone they haven't met.
He's wrong about many details when it comes to the facts and
Body language is not reliable or proof of anything.
I just want Laci’s family to know that Laci and Conner will never be forgotten. I will always remember Laci for her beautiful smile and will always remember Conner bc of the love and excitement his mother had for him. 💖💙
31:32 - "He would have had to do that in broad daylight and who would do that?" Well, it seems not a totally unpopular choice as Chris Watts seemed to use that exact strategy.
Why in the world, when the audio and video needs to be the best, do these interrogations have the worst equipment?
Because $$$ - Good enough for government work! ;-)
He acts mechanical...
You should find the interview with Scott’s sister. He stayed with her during this time and she said he continually talked about the pool. Going to clean the pool he needed to get the pool clean. She believed that he drowned Lacey in the pool.
It's possible, although I've heard one of the detectives say that SP wouldn't have risked Laci yelling too much, alerting the neighbours that were close by. Also she wouldn't be in the pool swimming (naturally), as this happened in December which is the coolest month in Modesto. From what I have heard he sounds like he was kind of obsessive about cleanliness. I never read the sister's book--it would be interesting to hear her take on this. Seems kinda weird that he was worrying about the pool when his wife and baby were missing--but there is a lot of things about him that are kinda weird.
Me:
Clicks on video
Sees that it's 56 minutes long
Gets super excited!!
Pauses it to get Pepsi and Doritos
My day is made!!!
Gah I love this channel! 😍
What flavour doritos? ☺
@@Smaugette regular. I'm simple 😂
@@clynnadams32 Yum, that sounds so good right now. LOL
Mmmm I did same! But a Pepsi and Pringles LOL yum yum 😋
@@clynnadams32 I like the ones with a hint of lime! Mmmhmm 🤤
Why do we think he ever told Laci about the affair? Seems like a bold face lie to me
Because he is extremely badly researched.
@@PrincessPoohs He didn't say it was for sure, though. He is saying thats what Scott said. Why are you so pressed lol? He also said Scott "never showed emotion in any tapes" and yet when the dead bodies of Conner and Laci were shown in court, Scott was tearing up. Why not focus on that? There's plenty of "badly researched" bits because this is just his opinion.
Don't believe that. Never did.
@@ac-fp9lx because he is extremely badly researched. 🤷♀️ It wasn’t just this one thing. And yea, in another video he said he believed that he told Laci. Along with a million other lies Scott told. Sorry but this was just a very poor and disappointing series of videos. No way around it.
@@PrincessPoohs I guess you're right.
So glad someone came through with older footage, and the first interview at that! I watched this case unfold in real time and it was such a ride.
He makes me so angry. To kill someone and continue to lie and still deny it to this day. He’s so heartless. I wish he would have left his wife and son. They deserved better.
Literally any other youtuber: *uploads a video longer than 20 mins*
Me: there’s no way I’ll watch this
Observe: *uploads a 56 minute video*
Me: *watches intently*
I'll never get over the finding of the baby in the Bay. May Scott never get a new trial; if it's true that's what his lawyers are working toward.
I remember one juror saying he couldn't look at the bay like how he used to before all of that, and how part of laci is still out there that they never found.
Everyone I know around their hometown thinks he did it. He's very disliked.
It’s no surprise considering the media attention the case got. He didn’t get a fair chance.
@@EddieMachetti people don't like guys who cheat on their pregnant wife and (most likely) kill them. 🤷♀️
@@C.Peters. Yeah, but it’s not likely that he killed her if you actually looked into the case and didn’t listen to what Nancy Grace says. I could convince you if you want.
@@EddieMachetti Go ahead. Convince us.
@@mr.baseball370 Are you aware of the series of robberies that took place in their area at the time? One happened the day Lacy went missing, and witnesses recall her walking her dog while the robbery took place. They caught up to the two men that robbed that house and they swore their innocence without even being told about Lacy. The police listened in on one of their phone calls years later while one was in prison. He mentions Lacy and the other tells him to shut up about it.
Then, there’s a problem with Scott’s alibi. He went boating the morning she went missing. He supposedly wanted to take his new boat out for a test ride. He told this to detectives the same day. News about Lacy going missing quickly broke out and Scott was a possible suspect. The police informed the media of Scott’s whereabouts shortly after interviewing him. I’ll come back to this in a second...
News then breaks out that Scott is having an affair. His mistress makes a public announcement. Everyone, including Lacys family, now believe Scott is responsible for Lacys disappearance. Before the mistress spoke up, the family was on Scott’s side. Everyone is now dead against Scott for they believe he had a motive in killing Lacy. But they still didn’t have a body...
Months later, Lacy and her infant sons bodies are found in the same body of water Scott took his boat to that day. Now, what I can’t wrap my head around is why Scott would tell police he was at the location where he supposedly just dumped his dead pregnant wife’s body. He could have said any body of water and he told them the one where he disposed of his evidence? I find that hard to believe. Let’s not forget the news of his whereabouts was released the day of Lacys disappearance AND the two robbers from across the street were clearly following the case based on them mentioning Lacy without being asked. It’s reasonable to suspect they framed Scott.
Detectives working on the case purchased the same boat Scott used. They took it out to open water with a hundred pound dummy to determine how Scott unloaded the body. They found it was impossible to dump the body into the water without the boat tipping over. This test was filmed.
Autopsy reports also suggest the baby likely died around December 29th which suggested Lacy was not killed until then. That’s several days after Scott was taken into custody.
People ask why Scott hid his affair and the answer is simple. Who tells anyone they’re having an affair? There’s no quicker way to have everyone turn against you, _especially_ in this case, and that’s exactly what happened. Police asked him in the first interview if he was having an affair and of course his first instinct would be to say “no.” So, he had to follow through with that lie. That was his biggest mistake.
He shouldn’t have been having an affair and he certainly shouldn’t have lied to police about it. He’s a piece of shit, but I don’t think that makes him a murderer. Nancy Grace and the media buried him the second they found out about the mistress. His trial was clearly affected by the media attention it got and that’s why it was unfair. Members of the jury outright admitted to having heard of the case prior to being brought on.
I shouldn’t say I’m certain that Scott is innocent. I am certain that he didn’t get a fair trial, and a fair retrial would likely work in his favor. This is one of the most fascinating cases in 20 years.
Anyone interested in this case should check out ‘Blood Brother: 33 Reasons why my brother Scott Peterson is guilty’ by Anne Bird. It answers heaps of questions about the family dynamic and they are all kind of cold, ‘blank books’ like this. The book TLDR is that Laci was a super perky, sunny person and they were a colder, more reserved and rather sardonic family and found her cheerful ways irritating. Because Anne was adopted and met the Petersons as an adult, she came into the Peterson family as an outsider like Laci and was with Scott and the family constantly in the days after Laci went missing, horrified by their lack of concern about Laci and Conner. If Scott didn’t do it, the real murderer just happened upon a woman whose husband despised her and was the perfect person to frame. Kind of like that viral video where the guy is happy to be arrested so he can get away from his wife.
@Blondesense Thank you for the info. I’m always most intrigued by the real insider’s opinions on these sorts of things so I really appreciate the tip
Did you recommend this in a Chris Watts video? I bought it and it is really good. 1/2 way through.
@@laalaag2auntyayag776 the book is a real eye opener. She just lays out all the bread crumbs that lead right back to Scott. Only Scott!
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 Ordering the porn channel when his wife and baby were missing and also the bit when Laci reorganised some breakfast baskets was the eye opener for me. His family hated her for sure.
@@blondesense1708 what happened with the bread baskets?
When he talks about Lacy asking him to put the mop by the front door, he said he did it because she WAS pregnant!! Not because she IS pregnant, but she WAS pregnant!
I feel like the interviewer writing down things was distracting and stressful to Scott. He was fearful of the documenting.
It's a tactic. Attorneys will use this same tactic when a defendant is being interviewed. They are usually scribbling on the paper. Doodling just to make the defendant feel uncomfortable about what they're saying. In reality the court reporter is already doing all the keeping up with everything a defendant has said and a copy is given to the attorney. They have no real need to take notes unless it's notes on body language or marking particular lies they detect. Mainly it's just a tactic to make any would be liar trip up from the added anxiety. When you're telling the truth and you're innocent you couldn't care less what they're writing. When your innocent however, you WILL show emotions through your body language. If I'd been Scott Peterson I'd have been a complete wreck and just asking over and over again," Has anyone heard anything or found her yet? Who's out looking for her? I need to be looking for my wife and son. Not sitting here talking about woodworking tools. Ain't nobody got time for that."
I love your long videos honestly. You could make them 2 hours and I'd still watch the whole video.
Is that a thinly veiled hint?!😄
Me too! I like the longer videos as well.
@@teaspoonsofpeanutbutter6425 why yes.. yes it is! 😂
@@maddievictoria4947 😄👍
Same. I love the longer videos; I wish they were more than an hour
Really lile how your going into the full story here. I dont know much or anything about a lot of the people and cases you talk about so its really helpful to understand the whole story and not just the readings you do.
He got many details very wrong, please do not rely on this guy for correct information.
@@PrincessPoohs he reads Scott like a book!
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 yes, except he’s illiterate.
@@PrincessPoohs no, he's genious! Spot on!
@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 😆
Who wants to bet the whole time he was thinking this was his Christmas present to himself?
@Keldas LushLife Thank you!
Agreed. Similar to Barry Morphew’s “Mother’s Day present.”
I lived a mile away when this happened. My dad met him after he sold laci's car to get a new truck. The only thing he worried about was what people thought of him. Not about finding his wife. I can tell you SOOOO much more inside info about this case. Let me just say he's Guilty as sin!
Typical snot-nosed kid worried about his reputation...Get a new truck, the image looks good...
He got a truck because police wouldn't return his truck that he made payments on every month.
He needed a truck for his job. If you did a little research and fact checking you might get better understanding about the case.
You have it wrong. The MPD are to blame. They're the ones who ignored crucial leads and evidence. If it wasn't for their incompetence, Laci could possibly have been found alive.
You want to explain how Scott killed Laci when Conner was alive no less than 6 days after the 24th according multiple eclxperts and drs? Possibly until mid Jan.
@@aok4418 while you are correct about him needing a truck, he traded LACI'S CAR (while she was still missing, because why would you trade your wife's car if she's coming home? ) I probably know more about this case than you EVER will since it happened in my neighborhood, had contact with Scott while Laci was missing, and knew a witness to Scott going to the bay in his truck pulling his boat at 1:30am. (Yes, the police got the timeline wrong.) He dumped her in the early morning hours, went back, cleaned and staged the house, let the dog out, then went back to get a receipt and alibi in case he was tracked to the bay.
You can say all you want, he's guilty as sin.
@@samanthabamantha5816 Because money doesn't grow on trees. Laci had complained about it. They were planning on buying something newer and more reliable.
If he dumped her in the early morning, then where is the evidence of that? The Marina ticket he gave police was stamped. No marina parking ticket was purchased during that time you claim.
No witness testified they seen Scott going to the bay at that time.
@@samanthabamantha5816 Where is there testimony proving he cleaned and staged the house, Einstein?
All the tests came back NEGATIVE.
Everything in that house that had the least hint of suspicion -- blood stains that they had to mark their location with sticky-notes because they were so small they wouldn't show up in the pictures. Everything in the pickup that had the least hint of suspicion. Everything in the boat that had the least hint of suspicion.
Besides collecting items for testing, cadaver dogs and scent dogs were used. Their results were inconclusive; most of it was not even allowed in as testimony it was so inconclusive. What was let in was contradicted with other dog testimony.
the tests that Kyo conducted on the mop and buckets, rags and vacuum cleaner contents, not one incriminating piece of evidence was found, proving that Scott Peterson had not participated in any attempted clean up in either the inside or outside of the Covena home. ALL the tests proved negative.
Officer Evers and Brocchini testified under oath at the Preliminary hearing, that there was NO smell of bleach in the house that night.
The State said Laci and Conner washed ashore, yet their own expert could not get them back to the same place, and the best dive and sonar teams could not find any evidence they had been where they should have been. So what difference does it make why Scott went fishing, or if he should have gone fishing, or what time of day he went fishing, or if he told some he was fishing and some he was golfing, because the State's own experts and other witnesses proved with a preponderance of the evidence that Laci was not where Scott was fishing.
Medical examiner currents
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right?
GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said.
GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud.
GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there.
GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
GERAGOS: Thank you. I have no further questions.
So fill me in on what you know!
Hey I was wondering if you’d please please do a body language analysis on the two adoptive parents of Orrin and Orson West? They’re two missing toddlers out of California city.
Yes!! Please!!
Love these longer videos, absolutely top notch.
Also does anyone else hum along with the intro song and do a little finger guns to the ceiling with the end notes?
I feel so seen
I love this account! I’m so interested in true crime, nonverbal communication, body language, and dark psychology. Your videos dive into exactly what I want to know about these classic true crime cases.
Im constantly amazed how many people still think hes innocent.
Just because there’s extremely minimal forensic evidence. But with his body language lack of concern and emotion along with all the circumstantial evidence come on man...
@Leonard Holt yes, that IS exactly their job..
@Leonard Holt well hmmm.... wonder, why they ended up presuming he was guilty as fuck, then?....
Thank god, for people that go with strong intuition/discernment. It is not to be ignored, and WILL save your life in most cases.
@Leonard Holt They didn't. No doubt they were picking up the odd emotion, to say the least. But ultimately it was her body washing up where he went fishing.
Leonard Holt i didnt say that.
In my opinion the death sentence was wrong as they didnt have enough. But i believe he is where he should be. Life in prison works for me
PLEASE DO THE ORRIN, AND ORSON WEST PARENTS INTERVIEW. 2 MISSING KIDS IN CAL CITY CALIFORNIA.
YES!!! Please analyze the adoptive parents' body language.
@@kristipatterson9952❤ leave a separate comment. I hope we can get his attention! I asked the Orrin and orson west FB group to ask. If enough of us comment maybe he will see at least a couple.
@@GinnyB. Will do!!!
Guilty parents of children who are missing are my favorites to see. That sounds terrible. I can’t get the hand of the non verbal stuff too much, but verbal with those people is great..
@@addie_is_me yes their verbal is very odd to say the least. I wish they weren't wearing masks but I think a good analyst could still get a read off of the eyes, posture, body language, and verbal.
he very much gives me chris watts vibes, just blatantly wearing on their faces that they killed their wives and feels good about it
the second I heard the time he was leaving to go fishing, I felt like it was pretty suspicious. fish feed in the morning and in the evening, which is why you see fisherman getting up really early and seeing them at lakes around dusk. amateur.
Lockdown drinking game: take a shot every time he says ‘right off the bat’. I’m bladdered.
Is that brittish forr drunk? Never heard that term.
@@kristinj3339 that’s the one.
@Geegee Poo I’ve like exhausted like every like option like...I just want them like to come home like...
OK alcoholic.
This outro music is a banger lol
This could've been five hours long and I would still be just as interested and attentive. My goodness almost addictive these videos are, you sir have a new subscriber. Thanks for the content and time to create it.
When I tell y’all I FLEW here 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
"I was wearing Timberlands." - guilty! 🤣
I honestly believe that at that point, he seriously thought he’d get away with it... no body - no conviction... and you’ll _never_ gonna find her.😈
Well, Laci and their little boy had other plans... I think Scott is 💯 guilty. And I’m glad he’s behind bars - hopefully for the rest of his pathetic life.
Problem is
He is on death row
They get treated like Royalty on death row.
He's getting a retrial
@@msrustyspatula8679 only because our legal system is insane. Everyone knows Scott killed laci
A lot of people argue that Scott was innocent because the dog was found in the back yard with it's lead still on. Well, part of his alibi was that Laci took the dog for a walk to the park and went missing from there. But there is no proof that Laci ever took the dog out that day and he could easily have put the dog in the yard with it's lead on, or he could have taken the dog in his vehicle near the park then put him out of his truck, knowing he would find his way home. My dog once pulled the lead out of my hand and ran all the way home in terror when thunder and lightning struck up and he was desperately scratching his paws on the door trying to open it when I arrived minutes later.
I thought a neighbor testified to seeing Laci and the dog after he had left for fishing?
And it was the neighbor who put the dog back in the backyard because she saw it out in the street.
@@mrs.g.35 It wasn't Laci she saw. Another woman who looked like Laci and who was also largely pregnant came forward and she she was walking her dog that day and her dog was also like Laci's. All of these myths were debunked long ago.
@@dreaj1077 So? He still dumped that dog somewhere and it made it's way home.
I am addicted to watching your breakdowns. Brilliant. My kids and friends are in trouble.
I could swear I saw an interview with Laci’s mom, where she said she highly doubts Laci knew anything about Amber. She did in fact know about a previous mistress but never said anything about Amber.
Logan, I enjoy your longer videos, so thanks, and keep them up!!!
Thank you for creating all 3 parts!
Really enjoyed your dissection even with the frustration for the lack of body language from that monster
i really love how much work he puts in and research he does. even going so far as to try to clean up audio so it can be understood
I hope to God that his new trial does NOT get him out!! I know everyone has every right to their own opinions so if anyone believes that he is innocent, I am not trying to offend anyone. But although the evidence is circumstantial, that on top of the affair (not saying everyone who has an affair is a murderer) BUT, he had told Amber he lost his wife BEFORE Laci went missing, and then right before he got arrested, he changed his appearance, and had thousands of dollars on him heading towards the Mexico border! On top of ALL OF THAT, his behavior doesn't match up with a grieving/worried husband and father! 🤬🤬🤬 Thank you Logan @Observe for calling him out! I don't know if you would be willing to go back to a case or not but there have been a lot of things going around about the Jonbenet Ramsey case and people think her brother Burke killed her. I was wondering if you would be willing to do a read on Burke. I love all the information and details you point out so it would help to know what is making people think he killed her.
I totally agree with you about the appeal for a new trial. I'm going to keep a close eye on that. I pray he looses the appeal.
I noticed he said “she WAS pregnant” in this interview which is only hours after she is suspected of only being missing
22:21 I thought that too but he says, “yeah she’s yeah 8 months pregnant.”
U always upload when i'm having a bad day lol what would i do without youtube
I hope you're having a better day now!
I would be lost without yt. 😂
@@patriciahigh1310 LOL Me too, Patricia. I spend WAY too much time on RUclips!
Almost all cases were fought and won on only circumstantial evidence. It's how it was before DNA was a thing. Cases today are fought and won solely on circumstantial evidence . DNA isn't always at the scene of the crime. There's absolutely nothing wrong with circumstantial evidence.
Take a drink every time you read "circumstantial" :-)
Edit: Also, He was, in fact found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury. Otherwise they would HAVE to have returned a verdict of "Not Guilty". That's the rule/law/standard (jury instruction).
I hope you're never on a jury
Correct, and also DNA is circumstantial evidence, it requires the jury to still infer, by hearing the staTISTICAL testimony and other dna explained testimony. The ONLY direct evidence there is is witness (direct or from an accomplice) testimony or a videotape of the person doing the crime. I don't understand why these people don't understand why circumstantial evidence is in fact PERFECTLY GOOD evidence. Most cases are not won with direct evidence. 90-95% of cases are tried on circumstantial evidenced. Perhaps people need to read our Constitution, and research the rules of evidence. CSI effect is real. If DNA evidence isn't there-becauase none was found, does that mean that the victim murdered him/herself?
@@ch2nda yes, people really don't understand that circumstantial evidence is given as much weight as direct evidence by the courts.
@@dreaj1077 Wow, what an intelligent response. Thank you for adding to the conversation. /s
That’s also why so many cases get overturned and why the innocence project exists.
I grew up fishing (fishing trophies from 5 yrs old) & you're absolutely correct about fishermen ALWAYS know what they're going fishing for & take the correct bait, lures & poles with them. 2 other things that immediately does NOT make sense is that he took nothing with him to eat or drink not even anything to snack on. I've never seen that when going out on a boat, fishing from shore for a short period, yes. The biggest thing was the short amount of time he said he was "out fishing!" 1.5 hrs that's it! No FLIPPIN way!! #1 on a cool or cold day the water will be choppy (it's typically choppy there anyway) that causes you to go slower to get out to where you're going to fish (particularly so with his size of boat) & the same heading back in, that would mean he only actually fished for a little over an hour, all that work for 1 hour of fishing, no way you'd just get out, get things ready make a few casts & then leave. Absolutely not!!
i'm sorry but "flying rats ass" caught me off guard lmaoo
Just have to mention before I forget. Having worked in daycare for 6 years, i
I have seen a few kids who were unbelievably kind. Just all in all super caring, kind and helpful kids who take others into consideration and want to help others. It's hard to explain and for others to understand, but they truly were something else.
I agree! Some will even seek out the 'left out' children and take them under their wing. It's lovely to see.
@@angelamaryquitecontrary4609 exactly! We had a few of those over the years ❤ Those parents have definitely done something right ❤
He just sounds very tired. And he’s like not crazy about the fact that his wife is missing. He’s more like talking to a buddy. And why in the world would you be so detailed where the heck she’s washes the floor when she is missing!
I would love for you to somehow post a “two truths and a lie” video where we have to guess if you’re lying
Oh my goodness, yes!!
Poor Lacy 😢
If I’ve said it once , I’ve said it 1000 times.
If you’re guilty do NOT talk to police.
If you’re innocent do NOT talk to police.
There is NO WAY one should ever, EVER , take a polygraph, ever. It’s not evidence, it proves nothing, it’s not admissible for a REASON. Why? Because they’re inaccurate.
If you're guilty, feel free to talk to the police.
@@yuffduf yes, bad people should confess. I’m just talking from a lawyer’s point of view. I’m more of a hard evidence type when it comes to prosecution of suspects. I’ve seen too many innocent people be guided into a confession by zealous detectives. So, I suggest not talking.
I remember back then my twin lived 20 miles from where the body was found. The baby washed up separate and they say it came out of her in the water due to bloating, but they say the baby had duck tape wrapped around it's neck... They said back then that duck tape part was held secret because if somebody came forward knowing it then would know they were there or really knew something. Investigations will keep some things secret in the news to help them narrow down true witnesses versus nut jobs on the street wanting attention when people step forward with information.
Holy crap i never knew that! If true, thennnn he dismembered her and had to have done that to his own baby.. maybe the baby came out of her still alive so he did that to end its life, so weird tho ughhhhh that’s just so damn disturbing & even more saddening.. like I thought (and hoped) he had killed laci quickly, which in turned ended connors life also, and put her body into the water.. not all this extra stuff which makes me think it was not quick and probably not as painless ugh What a friggin monster.. :(
I don't understand; if the baby came out only due to her bloating, how would he have duct tape around his neck?
Can you do the interview with the adoptive parents of Orrin and Orson the 2 missing boys from California City??
I love that you're not only an excellent body language interpreter but do consider the big picture and use logic and common sense before reaching a conclusion! Great channel!
I see a lot of people stating this was a circumstantial case as though that means it wasn't proven. This led me to believe a lot of people must not understand what circumstantial evidence is and what it means. Because, this case was proven with circumstantial evidence.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that has no direct proof but is instead BASED ON A CERTAIN PROVABLE FACT or facts used to form a credible theory of the events of a case. Even the most credible eye-witness testimony is only circumstantial because there are so many influences that can have an impact on human recall.
In cases lacking direct evidence, the prosecution must attempt to provide evidence of the circumstances from which the judge and jury can logically deduct, or reasonably infer, a factual theory of the case that cannot be proven directly. It's up to the prosecutors to show through a set of circumstances that their theory of what took place is the only logical deduction-that the circumstances can be explained by no other possible theory.
100000%. direct evidence is wayyyyyy rarer than people think.
You don't understand what circumstantial evidence is Reneenay. It had to be explained to you.
Over a dozen eye witness. At least 10 of those witnesses described Laci down to the breed her of dog Einstein. Don't say it was another walker, because they couldn't find a woman that walked that day and matched Laci's description.
-LOOK ALIKES
JORDAN VISOLA-PRESCOTT
Jodan Visola-Prescott lives on the same street as the Petersons
and testified that in late December 2002, she was 4 1/2 months
pregnant with twins and frequently walked her border collie-
Labrador mix at La Loma Park. Her photo showed her
holding her swollen belly with her brown hair falling on her
shoulders like Laci.On cross-examination, she acknowledged
that she usually pulled her daughter in a red wagon during walks.
ELIZABETH GUPTILL
Guptill lives near the Petersons and was five months
pregnant in late December 2002. She does not have a dog
but often walked in the neighborhood around that time.
JILL LEAR
Lear lives near the Petersons and was 6 1/2 to 7 months
pregnant in late December 2002. Photos were shown
of her posed in black tights like the ones Laci Peterson
often wore walking. She often walked her dog in the
neighborhood and at La Loma Park around that time
but does not think she went on a walk on Dec. 24.
***********
During his cross-examinations, Geragos pointed out that the women
were hardly carbon copies of Laci in either habits or appearance.
He noted that Lear's dog was a small Australian Shepherd
with a black-and-white coat drastically different from Mackenzie's
blond coat. Bisola-Brescott's black-and-white spotted border
collie and Labrador retriever mix also scarcely resembled Mackenzie.
Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December
Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day
Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th
Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th
Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th
Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th
Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix
Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December
Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th
Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30
Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24
POINT OUT THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE RENEENAY?
Amy Rocha's unanswered telephone call to Scott Peterson on the afternoon of December 24. Although Detective Brocchini lied during the (leaked) Christmas interview and insisted on 12:30 PM -- Peterson in fact called his home around 2:30 PM on Christmas Eve.
You're welcome!
Please read Jonathan Mattingly (police officer who shot Breonna Taylor) interview
For what? It was proven that it was justified
@@goddammitalana LMAO no it wasn't, liar. Breaking into someone's house and shooting them is never justified. If it was a white girl, you'd care, though. Disgusting.
@@goddammitalana stop baiting. Liar
Berkley Police Department: Multi-million dollar Budget
Their Interrogation room camera: A rock with the picture of a lens taped to it
Yes you did it! We asked you to dig and you did! Thank you.
Oh boy if my defense ever depends on my recollection of what someone was wearing I'm going to jail. Unless someone is wearing something really out of the ordinary, I don't notice it. You know when kids go missing and parents say what they were wearing? I wouldn't be able to do that. I barely recollect what I had on the day before and I wore it all day.
Thank you so much for such a long and detailed video! We appreciate the effort 🙏🏻
Not only is your channel amazing, but you have a golden ear! I couldn't hear 99% of that interview! Thank you very much for doing all that work for us!!
DAAAANG! I didn't know where you were going with the Martha Stewart thing, but when you said it.... 🧠 💣 🤯
I'd hire Logan to be my attorney. He's good!
Not me dancing in class to the intro
every time hahaha, I love it!