I don't know where I come from, but I know this: the vast majority of my ancestors from the last 400 to 500 years are from central and southern Spain, many of them from northern Spain as settlers after the Christian conquests in Andalusia, from Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria, North of Portugal and Castilla-Leon. My ancient background is: 60% neolithic farmers. 32% Palaeolithic Hunters Gatherers and 8% metal age invaders. My y-chromosome DNA hapligroup is RM269 ( R1b) and the modern origin of my autosomal DNA is 57% Iberian, 10% Central Europe; 10% Ireland; 20% Italy (Sardinia and north); 3% Baltica-Finland. All this heritage of Celtic peoples, Iberians, Vascones, Aquitanians, Goths, Thracians, Latins, Illyrians, Rheti, coming from the East through the Mediterranean and the Danube and the Roman Empire and later barbarian emigrations.
@roberto lang No, but theres definitely hg A1 in European populations today. Hg A meaning the oldest hg originating and most prevalent today in Africa ( west, central, south and east )
The last population that came to Europe were maybe the most influencal one. They were the proto indo europeans that came form western and central asia.
@steve gale , I get it, I'm very aware of many different things in this world including understanding how genetics works but I can admit I'm not always the most perfect spelling person all the time. I'm sorry if that disappoints anyone even though I'm ok with it since I have so many more important gifts many other people don't actually have.
Europeans are the most diverse group of people on earth with blue green hazel to brown eyes. Red, blond black and brown hair pale to olive coloured skin and with every single combination of all those factors. The rest of the world has dark hair and dark eyes. It’s not racism to say Europeans are uniques in the world.
Colors are not the only thing that matters. Sub saharans are the most genetically diverse and have the most different looks but the world is too euro centric due to colonialism.
Reading the comments section on a science video makes me think of what it must have been like to visit a Victorian lunatic asylum. The more ridiculous the opinion, the more emphatically it is stated. Many of the people writing here need to go away and just read up on the history of science and just get a feel for how the enterprise is actually done. If you think it involves climbing to a piece of high ground and declaiming your self-serving belief system as unalterable truth, then I'm afraid you have taken a wrong turn somewhere. You're in theology.
Here you guys are literally casting Judgement on others casting judgement then condemning them by crying racist! Hypocrites just like the Racist - fucks that have made it their mission to make sure White people or Europeans know there is nothing pure or sacred about their genetics and actually their not Indigenous to Europe! The Over-rated Geneticists that came up with this advance sequencing openly admitted their goal is to end racism! So they start with Neanderthal and then obsess about Europeans! Neanderthal genes are present in almost all Europeans and for this to be possible they claim European women more than likely chose to sleep with Neanderthals.They also claim we have depression more due to this genes,diabetes,adhd,etc..! Then they deep dive into our Ancestry and point out the obvious ,that we're a mixture of these People but where I call bullshit is them claiming indigenous Europeans were black! I'm no scientist but I can guarantee we haven't completely changed from short,stalky black people to tall,lean-muscled, pale,blue-eyed, blonde haired people! Come on and not to mention many well respected Arceaologists and Scientist don't believe we came out of Africa or if we did we didn't come from Africans! That's not racist baby,That's just common sense and trusting your own eyes! We need some Conservative Professionals to add checks,balances! Too much P. C. , S.J.W !
@@redwolfmedia1276 there is tremendous proof that civilization originated in the near and middle east and they were dark haired peoples. Race is blinding you.
@@redwolfmedia1276 even recorded Roman ethnogenis mythology with is meant to purposely obscure origins for the uninitiated has Romulus coming from the Near and Middle East. Its safe to think they were some type of Brunette dark haired person. Race is blinding your intellect.
Redwolf and Adversary -- I'm 'white'. The genetics and archaeogenetics says that before about 10,000 years ago, there were no white people. White people arose in the North of Europe after H.Sapiens people got there, and it's where my ancestors come from (I'm from Celtic stock). 'White' is a fairly recent adaptation to the relative lack of UVB in Northern Europe, its necessity to penetrate to the dermis to produce vitamin D, and the fact that dark skin screens it out. It involves turning off only a couple of genes to go from dark to much lighter skin. There is another way to produce light-skinned people, but it's a bit more complicated, involves 4 or 5 genes, and produces the Asiatic type of skin colour - the Chinese, Laps, Siberian native tribes, etc. Without these adaptations, there would be no H.Sapiens people in Northern Europe - they would be sickly and unlikely to reproduce, or likely die, of lack of Vit.D.
Sadly, we are now living through the beginnings of another massive seismic change to the genetics of Europeans. Massive immigration into Europe from Africa and the middle east, combined with plummeting fertility rates, will see an almost total indigenous replacement, similar to the one 7 thousand years ago.
Presentation only. There are no findings supporting his bullshit. Modern anatolians were not present on Anatolia when agriculture came up. Krause is just another idiot. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
No findings to back it up? Are u kidding? What is DNA? Fairydust? Go bury your face in another book of lies. The court system uses DNA to catch criminals everyday...but as soon as its used to find identity of ancient people, somebody gets butt hurt and cries about it.
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 Precisely so! Address the argument rather than insulting the presenter and calling him an "idiot" That is the definition of trolling.
Could this be why North Europeans do better on high fat/protein diets while the southerners do well on carbs? Fascinating discussion! Johannes Krause gives interesting lectures!
Not to disparage this man's work, but this has been known about for a long time. The Indo-European invasion has already been well studied. Interestingly, he missed discussing the Basque population, which is important to study in contrast to the Indo-European population because they have stayed relatively homogenous genetically and linguistically all this time up in those mountains. Also, if memory serves (always tricky) Uralic languages like Saami and Hungarian appear to have developed about the same time as the Indo-European invasion suggesting other groups actively moving into what's now E. Europe about the same time. Where did they come from? And why did the language group survive when the Indo-Europeans were able to overwhelm almost the entirety of Europe culturally and linguistically? To me those are more interesting to study than the already previously understood migration of the Indo-Europeans, IMHO. And as I understand, the Uralic language group is also an indicator for genetic variations. I don't remember where that came from though, but the Saami (like the Basque) have stayed pretty distinct from the rest of Europe even to the present day. Lastly, agriculture was of course the innovation that drove the displacement - Hunter-Gatherers only generally had 1/10 the population density of early farmers - but I've read some speculation about disease resistance and dog domestication. The Indo-European movement also saw the eradication of the last of Europe's megafauna (like Irish Elk) and the speculation is they just outhunted the Hunter-Gatherers with better dogs in addition to whatever advantages agriculture brought. Always an interesting topic though. Mapping human movements through time is an interesting subject. What made those Indo-Europeans so successful though? They also swept South and East into the Indian subcontinent at the same time. Must have been a technology innovation that made them so prevalent. And usually that's a military innovation. Hard to displace people who are on an equal footing with you.
I would hardly say that no linguists had suggested that there might have been a massive migration from the step about 5 thousand years ago and also with it an influx of and major turn over of genetics. Many linguists have long believed that the origins of indo-European languages was in the step north of the Black Sea or possibly in Anatolia. With the degree to which Indo-European languages spread and the extent to which they did within what would seem to be a relatively short period of time, given the degrees to which they differ from each other, it seems to be that it’s almost certain that they spread largely due to population movements more than anything else. Which even in more modern spreading of indo-European languages has also been the case. Not that many people from significantly disparate origins don’t now speak said languages but the spread of those languages has first and foremost been due to population movements of modern Europeans (most recently). So it stands to reason it would likely also correspond to that in the past as well.
Can we see the impact of this in modern peoples dietary needs? Are people descended from farmers more able to digest gluten, pastoralists less likely to be lactose intolerant?
@@ayreign My mistake. I intended to say the steppe component of Germany seemed low because of the LOW prevalence of Y haplogroup R. I've seen further evidence, however, that it ( R1a and R1b) may be above 50% in Germany. That's not insignificant.
rooster 01 Scandinavians and Baltics actually have the highest amount of Steppe genetic component. Other Germannics and Slavics aren’t that far behind.
I would love to find out about the people of each country when they moved to Europe or Balkan and where do they come from and the century they moved to Europe or Balkan?!
there is some thought that a Great Flood occurred approx 11,500yrs ago ..... it may have wiped out large numbers of people a new begining perhaps for mankind changed coastlines etc migrations to fertile lands perhaps very very interesting
Absolutely ! There were massive and violent geological and climatic changes at the end of the Last Ice Age, around 11,500 years ago. We are still not totally clear about what caused it. It could have been a comet, striking the earth, a massive coronal ejection, explosions occurring at the core of our galaxy, which heated up our sun, or all of the above. Whatever the case, there was a massive extinction event going on at that time; It was a terrible time to be alive. Many larger animals such as woolly mammoths, saber tooth tigers, giant sloths etc were wiped out. And much of humanity perished in this catastrophe. Many of the human survivors had to migrate to safer, better places, in order to begin civilization anew. Those survivors are the ancestors, of all of us alive today. It might be worth your while, to check out the amazing work of Randall Carlson, Graham Hancock, and Paul LaViolette, if you haven't done so already.
@@theresemallory2425 This Sea Rise is true from the history of our people in south east Asia. Our ancestors once lived in the place which is now Ha Long Bay in north Vietnam. Archeologists found artefacts near the coast and on islands around, the clay stuffs and also paintings on the cave wall on islands. Due to the Sea Rise about 10,000 years ago, they lost their homes and had to migrate up north to nowadays south China. They settled down there in some thousand years then great drought came and they had to leave southwards one more time. The interesting thing is when they were living in southern China, they met up with the people coming down from north in south Siberia central Europe (Devil's gate) and gave birth to us later. Hence in our legend our forefather was said being a dragon coming from the sea (the south) and foremother being a fairy coming from the mountains (the north). It was a legend until recently when the human genetic immigration map was finished and shows the 2 lines of immigration of our people. The more interesting thing is the genetic map also shows how people in Ukraine Steppe (Indo-European) was related with people from south Siberia, hence we somehow are related to Europeans as well. People at that time were not bound into any territory or nation, they just travelled wherever they wanted, and they were not hostile to each other maybe because there were too few people in large areas people consider each other friend more than fro
Hi Johannes, I would like to have the title of a paper of yours about everything you explain here. I would like to use it as a reference for a book I am writing. My book is not related that much to your field of research but still has a common point with your work when it comes to people of Europe. You study them genetically. I would try to say something about them linguistically. I hope you will find time to answer me. Cheers.
Too repetitive...very interesting stuff, but each point is so belabored I kept having to skip forward. A bit frustrating because I did want to hear the results of the research.
The North of the Black Sea (Ukraine and South Russia, Yamnaya culture or people) is not part of Asia or Central Asia, it´s located in Eastern-Europe. According to these findings we can state that culture is downstream from genetics or demographics.
Does the third group from "central Asia" could be orginal Indoeuropeans who spread the language (and culture?) almost to whole Europe? Do Basq are geneticly Descendants of orginal hunter-gatherers? middle-east farmers? What with Neanderthals - we've known Europeans have got some their gens. Does Neanderthal's genes are more frequent in the past population? Whitch one? So many questions! So fascinating! :D
The Basques are originally Neolithic Europeans. But after the genocide of R1b you male population was replaced with their Y haplogroup. Likely, proto-Basques women survived and had children whom they taught their language and culture.
It is possible that this group from "central Asia" spread the culture (pagan) almost to whole Europe. Because our ancestors (I am Vietnamese) who were also partly from south Siberia (central Asia) have a lot of pagan culture in new year that are very similar to European pagan culture. They also worshipped the Sun before Buddhism came to the land.
Some of the massive migrations might be because of rising sealevels. All the sea between japan and china once were dry land floodplains, and we know that those are the place where we find large populations and civilisations. Same in europe, all of the north-sea were dry land, what we now call doggerland, and in the meditarranean sea, a lot of the littoral waters were actually dry land, and the sea between africa and asia minor, was also mostly dry land or very shallow swampy sea. When those populations were displaced, they in their turn displaced other populations, the same way that later happened because of the goths and the mongols. We do not today know the exact date of all those rising-sea-events, but a lot of evidence points to a massive asteroid hitting the ice above north-america, and other pieces hitting even the oldest pyramids, sometime between 4000 Bc and 3000BC, this event leading to rising sealevels, very rapidly, and in its turn lifting loose a gigantic shelf of antarctic ice which fell into the sea, in turn further raising the sealevels with a tsunami-like effect. A lot of this is still debated and will take decades before it can be properly scientifically proven, but the individual data exists, and are proven. Did the sea rise 10m or 60m or 100m ? Did it rise over periods of hours and days those two times, or did it take years? Was there a massive super-tsunami that murdered most of the coast of the world during that period? What wars followed because of this? Well civilisation broke down, almost nothing is left in writing, and that only in myths around the globe. The myth of the great flood. The myth of the war in heaven between the gods. All our evidence is in Geology, in Glacier Ice-Cores, in the growth-rings of trees and preserved lumber pieces, in carbon-dating of artifacts in archeology, in what dates settlements suddenly died. Now also in the genetic drift of the remains of dead people, and their living family.
I believe this event you are discribing happened, and is the reason for the change in culture. We went from tribal cultures to kingdoms and empires. People looked to strong leaders to deal with things they feared. This is when stone replaced wood as prefered building materials. This is what i think anyway.
A second wave of people came from "cemtral Asia the region north of the Black and Kaspian Seas" (i.e. north of Kaukasus and eastern Turkey). Does the maps provided in Germany show this as Asia??? A geografi lesson is needed no doubt.
funny how he says near east, anatolia to avoid saying middle east ;) recently basal eurasian was shown to be form the Arabian peninsula, the original population from which asians and europeans are derived from.
I know 1 lineage from south Siberia was where Europeans and Asians were derived from, based on DNA of the bones in Devil's Gate, not hearing about the Arabia peninsula lineage.
It’s a huge misconception. Before these recent discoveries that’s what we all thought. It’s a bit of a shame because now everyone’s under the impression that most of the ancient Europeans 5000+ years ago were replaced by Eurasian migrations, when in fact this Eastern DNA is only dominant in Scandinavia, Russia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. The 37 other nations still contain mostly ancient European DNA that came from Greece/Anatolia
Some comments here are racist .I am proud whatever Genes I carry I should admit whole humanity has evolved somewhere may be Africa central Asia or altai regions of north east whatever it may be am proud to he non racist loving human being the tiney part of humankind. I LOVE THIS GUY LOVE HIS RESEARCH.
Oroz5, to believe blindly in a theory is when you create religion. A theory is speculation with evidence to back it up, but that does not mean it is indeed true. Theories are meant to be disproven.
@@AlexP-jz9sg Most of the people commenting here aren't even able to comprehend the definition of scientific theory yet they consider themselves experts in human origin and genetics. Most comments prove that intellectually many people are still ignorant.
Thank you. It is good to see the interdependence between archaeology and genetics. It seems you just described my European ancestry. My confirmed haplogroup is U106, a descendent of P-25 (aka R-M343.) Prior to this confirmation I had a probable haplogroup of M269 but that is now relegated to an SNP of U-106. I liked and subscribed.
Did you have more extensive testing done> I am M269. Primarily Britain and north west European. I received my first surprise with my MtDNA--seems that I share the same DNA with many Swedes and Norwegians that I am unable to account for.
All these European were people from South Asian Aryan who went to west after defeat from Sudas the king of Bharat tribe some 7000 years ago. So these people have genetically and cultural similarity. This western always say middle East nonsense. Mittani were Aryan along with Hittites who capture land and ruled after they reached there. Some thousands later we see different tribes in Europe who went there from South asia
A bunch of weirdos in the comment section saying he has a political agenda because of the humans out of Africa theory. I don't think these people are able to comprehend basic science.
It was not farmers who first started farming. It was hunter gatherers who started it. Hunter gather culture lived thousands of year beside farming culture. There wasn't "sudden change" as many people are easily miscalculating. Population growth tells most of the story: from 2-4 million to 170 million during first 8 000 years.
Of course the genetic studies will bring many new material for historians , and it is a shame that in my country France it is forbidden to make genetic studies ...
Sigmund Bosch french ethnicity exist, it is just not defined by genetics but by culture. Genetically there is not much in common between a Basque, a breton, a picard or a provençal... all are french but genetically different
@@fablb9006 The french can be defined genetically. Also, conflating the small differences between Basque and Bretons and enormous differences between Africans and French is very dishonest. Genetics and culture go hand in hand. Culture passes from parents to children as do genes. But genes themselves also affect culture.
@@markkuuss According to the narrator; we were gods. Genetically, you were formed in my image. What continent do you find actual homosapien sapiens with no genetic admixture from earlier primates? And you're a genetic admixture of that sprung up 5,000 years ago; but you claim historical events that took place 6,000 yrs ago; go figure. Since you seem to be interested in genetics, you're aware that pigment derives from melanin? Two black people can produce a white baby; doesn't work the other way around kid.
Based on their skeletons, the men were super studly, like very elite athletes. They would kick sand in Arnold's face. But by three thousand years ago, they were looking a lot more like us--wimpy, relatively speaking.
If you do not know the answer to that. You are way too ignoramous on this topic... and it would require a vast amount of educating material to bring you any closer to understanding why he said that.
Can you please share with us- What Y dna genetic markers you have for the indigenous Europeans, the anatolians and the migrating Asians please!?🙏🏽🙏🏽 i am a polynesian from the c haplogroup, I am pretty certain on the "out of sunda land theory" for indigenous Europeans, Americans, Australians, oceanian, ainu and jomon, and North African berbers im dating it to be in sundaland around at least 45,000 years ago and migrating 12500 years ago after world cataclysm in sundaland. This is based off dna, archaeology, linguistics and cultural history and arts.
@@medit8iv_native970 Well r1b and r1a come out of P ( P = Q & R ) which I think comes from the south east Asian region, but Q and R emerging in north eurasian regions. But indigenous Europeans are I1 and I2 being the only haplogroup that originated in Europe. Minor haplogroups in Europe in anceint times were ydna C , but they became almost non existent and not indigenous. Haplogroup I , comes from IJ which was likely in the anatolia region, and I split off in europe, thus becoming " indigenous " and mutating specifically in Europe.
And berbers are ancestrally a diverse population. They're ydna is E1B1B, which originated in east africa. And up to 15000 years ago, many north Africans were 2/3 iberomaurisan/natufian and 1/3 west African. So not all of north Africans are non african in origin. Also consider that coastal north africans are eurasian looking, yet the interior and other parts are brown and black. Humanity is diverse and not linear at all.
@@SimpleMinded221 you understand haplogroup c was around in a time in the first migrations? Were g,h,I come off f, whic is located in south west India, f comes off cf were it's a sibling to haplogroup c. These lines were from the migration 70,000 years ago. You need to update your maps and data bank from familytreedna instead of the outdated data you're using. Familytreedna is also the largest y dna bank in the world and is the most current 👍🏽 its actually pretty easy to tell where everyone comes from, using the out of sundaland method 🤙🏾 and knowing the geograph back to the start of the last ice age.
Proto Indo European should be called Aryan. Its should be known that way as part of our heritage. Stop hiding history. Bloodlines can be tracked too. So can symbols
Please consider expanding your research to the Native Americans to either support or refute their claims as reflected in their myths. This would include both North and South America. Thank you.
A lot of the studies are done at universities in Europe, I think the universities in the Americas need to do what you want. ruclips.net/video/Dk65TbJRN_A/видео.html
They're working on it. Making up for past mistakes of others is one problem. Another is getting approval from Native Americans to make sources available to work with.
How much African DNA is present in Northern European whites? *(European whites have African DNA because of their colonization of Africa and their involvement in the Slave Trade.)
Agriculture and the move to plant based diets was not a good revolution as genetically people cannot eat that diet. A lot of people suffer from obesity and type 2 diabetes because of moving away from eating meat.
the switch to agriculture was a bad move because it threw away thousands of years of evolution....not because of plant based diets.....hunter-gatherers actually ate a lot of plants and the main thing killing people in the western world is cardiovascular disease which is from eating too much meat. Hunter-gatherers would've ate no where near the amount of meat that modern humans eat and that is the problem.....don't forget that agriculture includes animals and farming animals for meat.
@@physlift9175 The issue of increasing levels of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity is not caused by meat. That is the lie propagated by vegans and unscientific physicians. There is no scientific evidence that meat causes cardiovascular disease. There is increasing evidence that the current reliance on plant based diets high in carbohydrates and seed oils we have never eaten before the 20th Century is the cause of these diseases. Listen to videos of Dr. Shawn Baker and Dr. Ken Berry. Argue with them.
If it wasn't for the move to agriculture we would all be brown skinned, and there would be no racism. Too late to go back in time, and tell the European populations unfortunately 😂
It's actually out of Europe, into Africa and back into Europe. The only three hominids that humans could come from are all from Europe. Why these people never mentions this is a mystery to me.
Interesting brief discussion of long-term genetics. A map might have helped those silly people like me who still need a map to remember exactly where Anatolia is. But really, how many Europeans know exactly where Nebraska is without consulting a map? Thanks for the informative presentation, very well done research and presentation.
How does this reconsile with the studies that show the genetic difference between populations of people are less than 1% and that there is no definitive shared genetic trademark shared between all the people from one group?
@@soffiastefansdottir5719 Its less than one percent actually. Like what ? .2 to .4 percent ? Its not a lot. Humanity is one race/species along a spectrum
I do not agree with chronology that people came from Africa and went to Europe first then Asia and lastly Australia. When people left Africa they went Australia, the Asia, Europe and finally America. Personally I think that is why we have aborigines people in Australia. I hate to say this but it is very disturbing to see the scientific racism in which everything has to be about Europe first.
I have often wondered how genetics determined what a particular indigenous group was. For example I'm thinking of people taken from Africa and sold in to slavery in America. This sort of thing must have happened in other places too. The move from hunter gathering to farming is likely to have left traces in our DNA. A successful person in each group is likely to have different skills.
Trevor Matthews Trevor Matthews Please don’t believe what you’ve been taught about yourself. Your history has been hidden for a very powerful reason. If you are a descendant of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade (in West Africa) you are most likely Hebrew (race not religion) and not descended from African people (The son’s of Ham) Your history has been hidden for a very specific reason. In 70AD after the Roman Empire attacked Jerusalem, many fled into W Africa where they were sold by Africans. This is why you were initially called Negroes, not African (because you are not). Then the name was changed to Colored, Afro American, African American, now currently Black. Your history book is The Holy Bible; & an account of the slave Trade is in Deuteronomy 28 starting at chapter 68
@@007mia7 We talking about facts here, don't you hear the man explaining accuretely genetics shifts with genetics FACTS backing up his claims!!!! You guys are all over spreading lies and fairy tales, what this video has to do with that " Hebrew Isralites " BS???
Warum spricht er nicht deutsch ? Soll die breite Masse in Deutschland nicht verstehen was er von sich gibt. Es ist sehr unhöflich, auch seinem Land gegenüber.
Can we roughly tell the % of each of the three genetic components just from our phenotype? There is a classification of people based on personal colors (the color seasons) and from physical features (the Kibbe classification). Can these methods have a link to the genetic % of our three main ancestor groups?
To some degree. The phenotypes associated with Southern Europeans are an indicator of more Neolithic farmer DNA and Northern Europeans with Yamnayan DNA. Although the varying degrees and level of accuracy hasn't been fully explored. If it was de politicized, I'd love to see how phenotypes match up with DNA tests.
R1 is more older than PIE and splitted thousands of years before, but from what i see PIE have both R1a and R1b, but R1b is older in europe than PIE PIE origin cant be south asia because, there is some european DNA type (easterm most) in India (most in IE speakers, high castes and males) but almost nothing specific Indian specific DNA in europeans (like H for male lineage and M for female lineage) except some gipsy influences Caspian Sea has nothing to do with South Asia, is just a junction between East Europe and Central Asia
The idea that there wasn't an acknowledgement of a cultural influx from the steppe 5000 years ago is flatly bogus. That's the entire JP Mallory model for how the Indo-European languages got to Europe, by stark contrast to Colin Renfrew's Anatolian model.
Well you see, there was this guy named Hitler who did and said some things during WW2, and since then it has been unpopular, especially amongst Germans to acknowledge their supposed "Aryan" origin. (There's also a limit on what you can say and publish without "special interest" groups trying to censor you, perhaps understandably after what happened last time). The Hindu nationalist movement is also resistant to believing the Aryan migration hypothesis because it leads to the conclusion that Aryans build ancient Indian civilization and the dravidians were lower caste, or slaves.
5:11 - "of people that live in the Near East TODAY" -- WRONG. Anatolian Farmers were already European-like in Anatolia and nothing like modern-day Near Eastern peoples: Mathieson et al. 2015, p. 2. "Anatolian Neolithic samples do not resemble any present-day Near Eastern populations but are shifted towards Europe, clustering with Neolithic European farmers (EEF) from Germany, Hungary, and Spain."
this is all politics (politrix). IE did not come from Ukraine or Russia. It came from Greece, before that Anatolia, before that Armenian Highland/Caucasia, and the northern Middle East.
See also Videos from David Reich and also this recent article from him in NY Times : David Reich : " “Whites” are not derived from a population that existed from time immemorial, as some people believe. Instead, “whites” represent a mixture of four ancient populations that lived 10,000 years ago and were each as different from one another as Europeans and East Asians are today" (How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’, NY Times, 23 March 2018) www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html
I like Professor Krause's conclusion: That he and his genetic studies, and publications thereof, are giving a voice to millions of people who didn't "have a history." Maybe they were too busy working, and surviving, to invent writing and to write books! I greatly appreciate Professor Krause's efforts, to bring his findings to people like me, who "occasionally resemble barbarians"!: I was very busy studying engineering as a young man, and making a living from it during my middle years, and so now I'm "hearing ancient voices" ! Thank you, RUclips, and Professor Krause.
Amazing how a bit of science can stir up so many emotions . We're watching a bit of genetics/history information and it seems to me we've never learned from history.Perhaps is better to have comments turned off for these sort of vids
We support a lively discussion and will keep the comment function open to anybod, but will delete comments which are disrespectful or discriminatory. Thanks for watching our LT-Videos :)
I certainly do not intend to contradict many of the comments which are extremely positive; the gentleman is obviously very competent but I find personally that this is very general and abstract, the exemple of Germany being the exception. Otherwise, it tends to remain very theoretical
*Caution Researchers,* when preparing your Research Study Subject Question and Foundation, it is essential that one follow precisely the Scientific Ethics and Standards of Researvh Methodologies and Data Analysis, beginning with the title of the subject and including any "presumptions, as they must have full factual foundation". Example: here he mentions a reference which includes a presumption that does not qualify and fully accepted, Peer Review Journal Standard, as fact and that is: ... all out of Africa "Theory" It should be a "dah!" But we often make these blooms without Conscious Thoughts. On the subject, that theory is losing thrust. The evolution theory having been realized as inaccurate due to genetic studies the missing link was a DNA tweak 200,000 years ago. Gregg Braden spoke to this and it can be viewed on his Channel. Genetists are proving to be the link we needed to bring facts to the forefront and hopefully Mainstream Academics can adjust and get on the more Authentic Page. Human DNA a source of vast Facts. Thrilling to now and to History. Best Wellbeing all ...
Pastoralists? More like gruesome warriors. They're called indo-europeans (yes, like 90% of the languages of Europe) and were known earlier in history as Aryans (Oy Vey!)
Claudia Duma 2 months ago Do people dislike Europeans? The fact that older human bones in the Balkans (Europe) were found is ignored of course! But i guess this video is old because this article originally from University of Toronto is from May 2017. “7.2-million-year-old pre-human remains found in the Balkans” - “New hypothesis about the origin of humankind suggests oldest hominin lived in Europe” here is the source: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm
Nobody hates europeans, and the article says pre humans, not humans. Basically something like a proto chimp. Noone disagrees that pirimates could have been more wide spread than today. But OOA is more plausible due to haplogroup age and distribution ages
I-E history b/w 2nd millennium BC. & 1st millennium CE. Read how dark haired Vedic warrior caste (Shatriyas) conquered Iran-MiddleEast, Anatolia, Mediterranean, Europe, Great steppe, Southeast asia. First Mittani-Hatti Shatriyas conquered MiddleEast-Anatolia in 2nd millennium BC., their invoked deities are purely RgVedic. No I-E history predates them outside India. Greek-Macedonian, Roman, Medes all derived from them. Iranian & Greek history starts where M-H history ends. Roman elites were direct descendants of Mittani, Ramos-Ramulas came from there. Eastern Iran was ruled by Persian, Parthian, Sassanian Shatriyas. All Iranic rulers bore Sanskrit name/title. All earliest Greek frescoes are dark haired/eyed, their chariot, astronomy, astrology, art, architecture, Literature, script, cremation all came from Vedics. There's no possibility GR share common origin with Celtic blonde tribals whom they labelled subhum@n, b@rbaros. 👉Other Shatriyas first conquered the great steppe, then conquered SE Europe where they met Greeks & various blonde tribals including Celts, Slavs. First Cimme-Aryas in around 10th c. BC. Then Scythians>Sarmatians> Roxolanis>Alanis. One Sauromata branch landed in British isles before Roman, fought J. Caeser in 1st c. BC. with horse riding warriors, perhaps with chariots, can come only from Shatriyas, primitive tribals can't reach that level of disciplined warfare. Boudicca who fought Roman fiercely can only be Sauromata origin, no other women warrior have greater reputation than Scytho-Sauromatas. The Legendary King Arthur of Britain was Sauromata origin. Same story goes with every nation from Russia to Spain-North Africa. Later Norse, Goths, Vandals, Suebis were their political groups, they found earliest kingdoms of each location in post Roman Europe. In passage of time they interbred with blondes & got blondized yet brown haired/eyed population can be seen across Europe. TochaAryas, Kushans conquired Northern China, Tibet. Huns who stormed into Europe are TochaArya-Kushan offshoots. Again there's no possibility these steppe Shatriyas share common origin with Celtic & other blonde tribals. Shatriya blood can be found in Chinese, Turk, Mongol, Tibetian & various steppe tribals. TochaAryas penetrated deep into China, perhaps they were the first ruling dynasty, they introduced Chariot to Chinese, Chinese monarchy starts in around 10th c BC. 👉As for Southeast Asia, G. E.Gerini in his "Researches on Ptolemy's Geography of Eastern Asia.“ stated: "From the Brahmaputra and Manipur (Indian States) to the Vietnam, we can trace a continuous string of petty states ruled by those scions of the Kshatriya race,.... ". As per Gerini earliest Shatriya kingdom goes back to 10th c BC. In Burmese tradition Abhiraja is the first king. 👉Religion & culture: After Mittani-Hatti in 2nd millennium BC. Indra was replaced by Mitra all thru 1st millennium BC. to 5th c. CE. Median, Roman, Parthian & other bordering kingdoms of Iran worshipped Him. Mitraism was state religion of Roman. Sun God was Greek version of Mitra. Rulers, nobles of Iranian world & border region bore Mitradata (giver of Mitra) name frequently. Zoroastrianism was created on Mitraism around 7th c. BC. RigVedic Hari cult also flourished, Lydian, Scythian, Greco-Roman worshipped Him. Hari+Kula, Sanskrit "Kula"=Clan or follower, corrupted into Herakle, Hercules. Greek Zeus is corruption RgVedic Dyus, other deities are also derived from RgVedic. Norse Odin is Dayus, Thor is Indra. It must be noted, they're not Germanic deities, Germany was formed by Norse, Sauromata & Alani. Southeast Asian deities are mostly Pouranic (Hindu) yet Indra's motifs are seen frequently. It must be noted, RigVedic Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Nasatya are the earliest name of I-E deities found in inception of 2nd millennium BC. (treaties b/w Mittani & Hatti). long separation created the differences what we see, they all developed as per their own taste & environment yet the family resemblance never lost. Greco-Roman, Norse's funerary rite used to be cremation, also some evidence of Goths' cremation, cremation is exclusive to Vedics. Norse is nothing but corrupted version of Vedic mythology. Vedic Asur-Deva is Aesir-Vanir. "Edda" is some collection of Veda Suktas. Their timber architecture share striking similarities with India. Norse introduce ship building technology & navigation there. Scandinavia came from lord Shiva's son Scanda+Nauv, Sanskrit "Nauv"=Ship, thus the ship sailed to the new land was named "ScandaNauv"> Scandinavia. Sanskrit "Shatra"(Shatriya), Greek "Shatrap", old Iranian "Shayatiya", Persian "Sha" share common meaning Kingship, authority, governing. 👉Celtic & other blonde tribals migrated from Yamnaya to Europe 3-4k years back. They are passive race, had they been martial race they would've stormed towards prosperous Middle East & South Asia. Those who sacked Rome in the BC's & CE's were from Shatriyas SE Europe. They didn't even ride horse let alone having chariot. They've no history, no mythology, no literature, no sense of nationhood/monarchy, they were in tribalism as late as 5th-10th c. CE., r@ping women used to be their custom (ref. Tacitus, Ibn Fadlan), even human s@crifice. There's no evidence of their native language, the languages they speak today have come from Greco-Roman, Steppe Shatriyas. Only India, Iran, Greco-Roman had chariots. Even later expansionists were dark haired, like C. Columbus, N. Bonaparte etc. 👉Ethnology: Shatriyas were massive in height & girth, dark haired/eyed, olive to medium fair skinned. Greeks described king Porus was above 7' tall. Motif of Ashoka the great & Iranian Shatriyas are seen larger than the rest as well. All early Greek, Scythian, Sauromata frescoes are found dark haired/eyed. As per Tacitus, G-R were taller than northerners. So called Germanic warriors Vandal's earliest images are found dark haired/eyed. After Roman conquest around 1st c BC. Shatriyas bred with blonde tribals as a result we can see uneven distribution of brunette & blonde across Europe. Intercaste marriage in India-Iran brought the changes in size, form & loss of martial quality. 👉Everything sprung out of India. Aryan=Vedic, Vedic=Aryan. RgVeda is no less than 7k years, even after pulling down to 16th c BC. still it remains oldest of all I-E literature. Iranic "Gatha" came around 10th c. BC. Zoroastrian texts didn't come before 7th c. BC. Greek Iliad & Odyssey came not before 8th c. BC. India hosts 6.5k years old city "Rakhigarhi", also predates Sumerian cities. No civilization gave birth equal to Ashoka tg & Kurus tg, Xtianity could born only because Kurus tg saved Judaism from extinction, he's regarded "messiah" Judaic texts. That's all history of Europe & great Steppe. 👉Read statements of some reputed western historians: Will Durant, American historian. "India was the motherland of our race, and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages: she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity; mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all." William James, American Author "From the Vedas, we learn a practical art of surgery, medicine, music, house building under which mechanized art is included. They are encyclopedia of every aspect of life, culture, religion, science, ethics, law, cosmology and meteorology."
This is fascinating and I've been thinking about this for 20 of my 34 years of age. As a PHD in economics, I find I need more data from anthropologists during the 5k year bc plus time towards 1st evidence of homo sapiens. For example: Please explain why the Egyptian Sphinx was altered. The head doesn't match the scale of the body. A untrained child can see as much. Perhaps I'm wrong, but a gut inscinct tells me a larger sandstone head was recut. Therefore whomever built that area of Cairo, could be much earlier. Rationally, why would a society, out of the blue, architect something so precise as Giza. Hard to understand and I'm under the impression we have the info incorrect.
One reason for altering the Sphinx is probably erosion damage, another pure politics, and the wildcard is that it was damaged by asteroid bombardment....the only thing we know for sure is THAT it was altered, and that it is far older than the surrounding pyramids, and that it probably had a twin on the other side of the river, currently under water. We took away most the statues of Stalin and Lenin. We blew up a lot of swasticas after Hitler died. We will probably remove a lot of statues of Nathan Bedford Forrest soon. Who can say for sure why they altered the sphinx?
wow he really underplays the steppe herder admixture, you average German is like 30-40% Anatolian farmer, 40-50% steppe herder and 10-20% hunter gatherer, he must have gotten them mixed up, although he says in Spain only 5% come from steppe herders when its more like 25% so what is he on about?
The estimates of the percentages have changed. There is also more data available. Besides, steppe herder ancestry is also made up of European hunter-gatherer DNA, so this might make it difficult to differentiate them (note that his explanation is purposefully simplified). That being said, he does make some clear mistakes. As you said, the percentage of steppe herder DNA in Spain is way too low (I believe even way too low for the Basque country). It may have been a result of the sample size. I also find it weird he refers to the steppe herders as Central Asians, when these peoples originated in the Western Eurasian steppes fully within Europe. They sure had native Central Asian ancestry though.
Key in to 3:32. " reconstructing the ancient genomes" which means they are recovering small fragments and essentially making up the rest. So there you have it; proof of no proof at all.
No it it not,in the beginning he said out of Africa and all around the world.as for the early European Chang of DNA type means they where dark skin people before the caucus people move in... if you watch his other lecture he said white skin only been around max 6000 years.
@@ebonytv3414 yeah, also the ancestors of the "caucusus people" where dark skinned. So what are you talking about? All non-africans came from a single east african tribe... and as he said in the video, the dark skinned indigenous hunter & gatherers of europe are one of three main genetic components who formed modern day european populations. So what's exactly your point? The indigenous hunters are even phenotypically visible in modern day europeans. They gave europeans their blue eyes... think about that, when you see a blue eyed person of european descent the next time. The people with the highest amount of indigenous european hunter descent live in the baltics and scandinavia btw. And they aren't kangz... so what is your mission here?
Who says we speak INDOeuropean or that Hungarian or Turkish (coming from hitites) or Sumerian is not European? It is. The Greek language is not. How long will the agenda persist? Yes we did invent farming in the Europe. Where else?
It's all basically eurasian, Anatolian and hunter gatherers including Ashkenazim, Sephardim and Mizrachi, Romoni, Arab. Northern Africa DNA originated in Eastern Africa proper DNA from Lower Africa is present in Northern Africa too.
@@natanyaaberra4984 modern north africans came from near east 12000 years ago and mixed with the ancient north africans who were only 1/3 sub saharan/east african. Today's north africans have only 10% sub saharan dna.
Someone tell Krause that “north of the black sea” is not central asia - it is not even Western asia, it is Eastern Europe
Exactly survive the jive
Well its the border of Europe
@MafiaIntia yes
@MafiaIntia yes
@Secret Guy "Sincerely, Pleased_Customer187"
I don't know where I come from, but I know this: the vast majority of my ancestors from the last 400 to 500 years are from central and southern Spain, many of them from northern Spain as settlers after the Christian conquests in Andalusia, from Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria, North of Portugal and Castilla-Leon.
My ancient background is: 60% neolithic farmers. 32% Palaeolithic Hunters Gatherers and 8% metal age invaders. My y-chromosome DNA hapligroup is RM269 ( R1b) and the modern origin of my autosomal DNA is 57% Iberian, 10% Central Europe; 10% Ireland; 20% Italy (Sardinia and north); 3% Baltica-Finland. All this heritage of Celtic peoples, Iberians, Vascones, Aquitanians, Goths, Thracians, Latins, Illyrians, Rheti, coming from the East through the Mediterranean and the Danube and the Roman Empire and later barbarian emigrations.
@roberto lang No, but theres definitely hg A1 in European populations today. Hg A meaning the oldest hg originating and most prevalent today in Africa ( west, central, south and east )
The last population that came to Europe were maybe the most influencal one. They were the proto indo europeans that came form western and central asia.
Its mindblowing how their language and culture streches from europe to india even if their genetic makeup is minimal in most places.
@@mrithulmkumar5263 but They were quite successful in making their Haplogroup dominant.
The indoeuropeans are from anatolia
@@veronicalogotheti5416 See Kurgan theory. Indoeuropeans are from pontic stepps.
@@peterjobovic3406 they were from anatolia
Is proven
Anita tablet hitites
Yes they went around
EUROPEANS ARE DIVERSE
its Racist to say we all look the same
we do not.
What a boring world it would be, if we all looked the same.
Exactly ..
Well made point!
I am Polish with dark hair and dark eyes and I have a cousin who is related by blood who is blond and has blue eyes.
That's not really racist but ok
I am sick and tired of people claiming to know where humanity came from, without even knowing what mithocondrial DNA is.
@steve gale , I get it, I'm very aware of many different things in this world including understanding how genetics works but I can admit I'm not always the most perfect spelling person all the time. I'm sorry if that disappoints anyone even though I'm ok with it since I have so many more important gifts many other people don't actually have.
We came from space
Europeans are the most diverse group of people on earth with blue green hazel to brown eyes. Red, blond black and brown hair pale to olive coloured skin and with every single combination of all those factors. The rest of the world has dark hair and dark eyes. It’s not racism to say Europeans are uniques in the world.
@Siberian Hunter
Try again bucko
@Siberian Hunter
Bullshit
All of those colors came out of the womb of the kinky haired brown woman.
Colors are not the only thing that matters. Sub saharans are the most genetically diverse and have the most different looks but the world is too euro centric due to colonialism.
@@marsiyahsteeltrap6536 Yes. The most genetically diverse people in the world.
Reading the comments section on a science video makes me think of what it must have been like to visit a Victorian lunatic asylum. The more ridiculous the opinion, the more emphatically it is stated. Many of the people writing here need to go away and just read up on the history of science and just get a feel for how the enterprise is actually done. If you think it involves climbing to a piece of high ground and declaiming your self-serving belief system as unalterable truth, then I'm afraid you have taken a wrong turn somewhere. You're in theology.
Here you guys are literally casting Judgement on others casting judgement then condemning them by crying racist! Hypocrites just like the Racist - fucks that have made it their mission to make sure White people or Europeans know there is nothing pure or sacred about their genetics and actually their not Indigenous to Europe! The Over-rated Geneticists that came up with this advance sequencing openly admitted their goal is to end racism! So they start with Neanderthal and then obsess about Europeans! Neanderthal genes are present in almost all Europeans and for this to be possible they claim European women more than likely chose to sleep with Neanderthals.They also claim we have depression more due to this genes,diabetes,adhd,etc..! Then they deep dive into our Ancestry and point out the obvious ,that we're a mixture of these People but where I call bullshit is them claiming indigenous Europeans were black! I'm no scientist but I can guarantee we haven't completely changed from short,stalky black people to tall,lean-muscled, pale,blue-eyed, blonde haired people! Come on and not to mention many well respected Arceaologists and Scientist don't believe we came out of Africa or if we did we didn't come from Africans! That's not racist baby,That's just common sense and trusting your own eyes! We need some Conservative Professionals to add checks,balances! Too much P. C. , S.J.W !
@@redwolfmedia1276 you are a little insane.
@@redwolfmedia1276 there is tremendous proof that civilization originated in the near and middle east and they were dark haired peoples. Race is blinding you.
@@redwolfmedia1276 even recorded Roman ethnogenis mythology with is meant to purposely obscure origins for the uninitiated has Romulus coming from the Near and Middle East. Its safe to think they were some type of Brunette dark haired person. Race is blinding your intellect.
Redwolf and Adversary -- I'm 'white'. The genetics and archaeogenetics says that before about 10,000 years ago, there were no white people. White people arose in the North of Europe after H.Sapiens people got there, and it's where my ancestors come from (I'm from Celtic stock). 'White' is a fairly recent adaptation to the relative lack of UVB in Northern Europe, its necessity to penetrate to the dermis to produce vitamin D, and the fact that dark skin screens it out. It involves turning off only a couple of genes to go from dark to much lighter skin. There is another way to produce light-skinned people, but it's a bit more complicated, involves 4 or 5 genes, and produces the Asiatic type of skin colour - the Chinese, Laps, Siberian native tribes, etc. Without these adaptations, there would be no H.Sapiens people in Northern Europe - they would be sickly and unlikely to reproduce, or likely die, of lack of Vit.D.
Sadly, we are now living through the beginnings of another massive seismic change to the genetics of Europeans. Massive immigration into Europe from Africa and the middle east, combined with plummeting fertility rates, will see an almost total indigenous replacement, similar to the one 7 thousand years ago.
why is that sad? you already mixed with them 4000 years ago. what's the problem now?
@@tradingbull007 🤔🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Johannes Krause must be part Italian; he moves his hands quite a bit when he speaks !
Frances Van Siclen not really
LOL
maybe but also german name... why do germans have such obsession with genetics XD
@@claudiamarianidamato9499 LOL! He looked like he was having a seizure!
@@mimm4332 because our genetics and history has been denigrated by rotten apples we welcomed with open arms . Google Scythians
Brilliant young man, excellent lecturer.
Sensational presentation and findings! Cant wait for new human genetic discoveries. Great work!
Presentation only. There are no findings supporting his bullshit. Modern anatolians were not present on Anatolia when agriculture came up. Krause is just another idiot. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
No findings to back it up? Are u kidding? What is DNA? Fairydust? Go bury your face in another book of lies.
The court system uses DNA to catch criminals everyday...but as soon as its used to find identity of ancient people, somebody gets butt hurt and cries about it.
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 Is everyone that you disagree with an "idiot"?
@@abrahamdozer6273 Address the arguments or shut up!
@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727
Precisely so!
Address the argument rather than insulting the presenter and calling him an "idiot"
That is the definition of trolling.
I’m sorry I ever read the comments. It makes me worry for the future of the human race.
Oh, don't worry, we won't make it for sure, you don't have to worry about *that*.
Great presentation.
Excellent research plans! I enjoyed the video! Excited see more from this channel!
Magnificent so well explained in just 15 minutes. Thanks a lot ,you are a great guy
They keep advertising Grammerly...
@@johnmorris7818 *Grammarly
Could this be why North Europeans do better on high fat/protein diets while the southerners do well on carbs? Fascinating discussion! Johannes Krause gives interesting lectures!
Krause is dizzy calling the region North of the Black- and Kaspian Seas "Central Asia"! Why not South East Europe?
Not to disparage this man's work, but this has been known about for a long time. The Indo-European invasion has already been well studied. Interestingly, he missed discussing the Basque population, which is important to study in contrast to the Indo-European population because they have stayed relatively homogenous genetically and linguistically all this time up in those mountains.
Also, if memory serves (always tricky) Uralic languages like Saami and Hungarian appear to have developed about the same time as the Indo-European invasion suggesting other groups actively moving into what's now E. Europe about the same time. Where did they come from? And why did the language group survive when the Indo-Europeans were able to overwhelm almost the entirety of Europe culturally and linguistically? To me those are more interesting to study than the already previously understood migration of the Indo-Europeans, IMHO. And as I understand, the Uralic language group is also an indicator for genetic variations. I don't remember where that came from though, but the Saami (like the Basque) have stayed pretty distinct from the rest of Europe even to the present day.
Lastly, agriculture was of course the innovation that drove the displacement - Hunter-Gatherers only generally had 1/10 the population density of early farmers - but I've read some speculation about disease resistance and dog domestication. The Indo-European movement also saw the eradication of the last of Europe's megafauna (like Irish Elk) and the speculation is they just outhunted the Hunter-Gatherers with better dogs in addition to whatever advantages agriculture brought.
Always an interesting topic though. Mapping human movements through time is an interesting subject. What made those Indo-Europeans so successful though? They also swept South and East into the Indian subcontinent at the same time. Must have been a technology innovation that made them so prevalent. And usually that's a military innovation. Hard to displace people who are on an equal footing with you.
Ukraine and S.W. Russia is not central Asia.
Right. The guy may be a great scholar in his field. But his geographic knowledge is worse than that of my 10-year-old daughter.
I would hardly say that no linguists had suggested that there might have been a massive migration from the step about 5 thousand years ago and also with it an influx of and major turn over of genetics. Many linguists have long believed that the origins of indo-European languages was in the step north of the Black Sea or possibly in Anatolia. With the degree to which Indo-European languages spread and the extent to which they did within what would seem to be a relatively short period of time, given the degrees to which they differ from each other, it seems to be that it’s almost certain that they spread largely due to population movements more than anything else. Which even in more modern spreading of indo-European languages has also been the case. Not that many people from significantly disparate origins don’t now speak said languages but the spread of those languages has first and foremost been due to population movements of modern Europeans (most recently). So it stands to reason it would likely also correspond to that in the past as well.
Remarkably interesting and well-explained presentation!
Great research! Thanks for sharing!
Can we see the impact of this in modern peoples dietary needs? Are people descended from farmers more able to digest gluten, pastoralists less likely to be lactose intolerant?
brain food
The steppe component of the german population seems low considering the high proportions of haplogroups R1a and R1b.
Those are the Steppe components!
Along with some other haplogroups...
@rooster , which Y-dna haplogroup was carried by steppe people?
@@ayreign My mistake. I intended to say the steppe component of Germany seemed low because of the LOW prevalence of Y haplogroup R. I've seen further evidence, however, that it ( R1a and R1b) may be above 50% in Germany. That's not insignificant.
rooster 01 Scandinavians and Baltics actually have the highest amount of Steppe genetic component. Other Germannics and Slavics aren’t that far behind.
Brilliantly and vividly explained.
I would love to find out about the people of each country when they moved to Europe or Balkan and where do they come from and the century they moved to Europe or Balkan?!
there is some thought that
a Great Flood occurred approx
11,500yrs ago .....
it may have wiped out large numbers of people
a new begining perhaps for mankind
changed coastlines etc
migrations to fertile lands perhaps
very very interesting
Absolutely ! There were massive and violent geological and climatic changes at the end of the Last Ice Age, around 11,500 years ago. We are still not totally clear about what caused it.
It could have been a comet, striking the earth,
a massive coronal ejection,
explosions occurring at the core of our galaxy, which heated up our sun,
or all of the above.
Whatever the case, there was a massive extinction event going on at that time;
It was a terrible time to be alive.
Many larger animals such as woolly mammoths, saber tooth tigers, giant sloths etc were wiped out.
And much of humanity perished in this catastrophe.
Many of the human survivors had to migrate to safer, better places, in order to begin civilization anew.
Those survivors are the ancestors, of all of us alive today.
It might be worth your while, to check out the amazing work of Randall Carlson, Graham Hancock, and Paul LaViolette, if you haven't done so already.
@@theresemallory2425 This Sea Rise is true from the history of our people in south east Asia. Our ancestors once lived in the place which is now Ha Long Bay in north Vietnam. Archeologists found artefacts near the coast and on islands around, the clay stuffs and also paintings on the cave wall on islands. Due to the Sea Rise about 10,000 years ago, they lost their homes and had to migrate up north to nowadays south China. They settled down there in some thousand years then great drought came and they had to leave southwards one more time. The interesting thing is when they were living in southern China, they met up with the people coming down from north in south Siberia central Europe (Devil's gate) and gave birth to us later. Hence in our legend our forefather was said being a dragon coming from the sea (the south) and foremother being a fairy coming from the mountains (the north). It was a legend until recently when the human genetic immigration map was finished and shows the 2 lines of immigration of our people.
The more interesting thing is the genetic map also shows how people in Ukraine Steppe (Indo-European) was related with people from south Siberia, hence we somehow are related to Europeans as well. People at that time were not bound into any territory or nation, they just travelled wherever they wanted, and they were not hostile to each other maybe because there were too few people in large areas people consider each other friend more than fro
Hi Johannes, I would like to have the title of a paper of yours about everything you explain here. I would like to use it as a reference for a book I am writing. My book is not related that much to your field of research but still has a common point with your work when it comes to people of Europe. You study them genetically. I would try to say something about them linguistically. I hope you will find time to answer me. Cheers.
Too repetitive...very interesting stuff, but each point is so belabored I kept having to skip forward. A bit frustrating because I did want to hear the results of the research.
The North of the Black Sea (Ukraine and South Russia, Yamnaya culture or people) is not part of Asia or Central Asia, it´s located in Eastern-Europe. According to these findings we can state that culture is downstream from genetics or demographics.
Does the third group from "central Asia" could be orginal Indoeuropeans who spread the language (and culture?) almost to whole Europe? Do Basq are geneticly Descendants of orginal hunter-gatherers? middle-east farmers? What with Neanderthals - we've known Europeans have got some their gens. Does Neanderthal's genes are more frequent in the past population? Whitch one?
So many questions! So fascinating! :D
From what i read
The dutch today are viking huns
The Basques are originally Neolithic Europeans. But after the genocide of R1b you male population was replaced with their Y haplogroup. Likely, proto-Basques women survived and had children whom they taught their language and culture.
@@GGTanguera ¿Really?
It is possible that this group from "central Asia" spread the culture (pagan) almost to whole Europe. Because our ancestors (I am Vietnamese) who were also partly from south Siberia (central Asia) have a lot of pagan culture in new year that are very similar to European pagan culture. They also worshipped the Sun before Buddhism came to the land.
Some of the massive migrations might be because of rising sealevels. All the sea between japan and china once were dry land floodplains, and we know that those are the place where we find large populations and civilisations. Same in europe, all of the north-sea were dry land, what we now call doggerland, and in the meditarranean sea, a lot of the littoral waters were actually dry land, and the sea between africa and asia minor, was also mostly dry land or very shallow swampy sea. When those populations were displaced, they in their turn displaced other populations, the same way that later happened because of the goths and the mongols. We do not today know the exact date of all those rising-sea-events, but a lot of evidence points to a massive asteroid hitting the ice above north-america, and other pieces hitting even the oldest pyramids, sometime between 4000 Bc and 3000BC, this event leading to rising sealevels, very rapidly, and in its turn lifting loose a gigantic shelf of antarctic ice which fell into the sea, in turn further raising the sealevels with a tsunami-like effect. A lot of this is still debated and will take decades before it can be properly scientifically proven, but the individual data exists, and are proven. Did the sea rise 10m or 60m or 100m ? Did it rise over periods of hours and days those two times, or did it take years? Was there a massive super-tsunami that murdered most of the coast of the world during that period? What wars followed because of this? Well civilisation broke down, almost nothing is left in writing, and that only in myths around the globe. The myth of the great flood. The myth of the war in heaven between the gods. All our evidence is in Geology, in Glacier Ice-Cores, in the growth-rings of trees and preserved lumber pieces, in carbon-dating of artifacts in archeology, in what dates settlements suddenly died. Now also in the genetic drift of the remains of dead people, and their living family.
I believe this event you are discribing happened, and is the reason for the change in culture. We went from tribal cultures to kingdoms and empires. People looked to strong leaders to deal with things they feared. This is when stone replaced wood as prefered building materials. This is what i think anyway.
Mongols are not huns
the Sea Rise was about 10,000 years ago.
Could you please post a video about the Balkans so that they not fight about it any more, thanks!
A second wave of people came from "cemtral Asia the region north of the Black and Kaspian Seas" (i.e. north of Kaukasus and eastern Turkey). Does the maps provided in Germany show this as Asia??? A geografi lesson is needed no doubt.
funny how he says near east, anatolia to avoid saying middle east ;) recently basal eurasian was shown to be form the Arabian peninsula, the original population from which asians and europeans are derived from.
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND look up basal eurasian buddy he should be saying Arabian peninsula
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND try again after doing some reading.
@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND What are you rambling about?
Basal eurasians dont have neanderthal input. Their phenotype is also quite interesting, but I wont set you off ;)
I know 1 lineage from south Siberia was where Europeans and Asians were derived from, based on DNA of the bones in Devil's Gate, not hearing about the Arabia peninsula lineage.
This man has a German name but his mother must be Italian. He would really look charming with a clean shave.
I was expecting germans to have more genes from the stepp
It’s a huge misconception. Before these recent discoveries that’s what we all thought. It’s a bit of a shame because now everyone’s under the impression that most of the ancient Europeans 5000+ years ago were replaced by Eurasian migrations, when in fact this Eastern DNA is only dominant in Scandinavia, Russia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. The 37 other nations still contain mostly ancient European DNA that came from Greece/Anatolia
Peterthesneakybastard My family line largely comes from the British isles and even I have 46% indo european DNA.
Some comments here are racist .I am proud whatever Genes I carry I should admit whole humanity has evolved somewhere may be Africa central Asia or altai regions of north east whatever it may be am proud to he non racist loving human being the tiney part of humankind. I LOVE THIS GUY LOVE HIS RESEARCH.
Many of racist flock to videos like this to spread the false racist comments.
Lets throw the out of Africa theory away for the moment, for some reason it's starting to make less sense to me...
Denial is not just a river in Africa!
Oroz5, to believe blindly in a theory is when you create religion. A theory is speculation with evidence to back it up, but that does not mean it is indeed true. Theories are meant to be disproven.
Freemasons will usher the emergence of Dajjal fairy tails
Try disproving it.
@@AlexP-jz9sg Most of the people commenting here aren't even able to comprehend the definition of scientific theory yet they consider themselves experts in human origin and genetics. Most comments prove that intellectually many people are still ignorant.
Thank you. It is good to see the interdependence between archaeology and genetics. It seems you just described my European ancestry. My confirmed haplogroup is U106, a descendent of P-25 (aka R-M343.) Prior to this confirmation I had a probable haplogroup of M269 but that is now relegated to an SNP of U-106. I liked and subscribed.
R1b l23 sicily
@rationalism
Still less than the Britons though - and they had been re-colonized by Middle Eastern farmers, from France, about 1000BC!
Did you have more extensive testing done> I am M269. Primarily Britain and north west European. I received my first surprise with my MtDNA--seems that I share the same DNA with many Swedes and Norwegians that I am unable to account for.
All these European were people from South Asian Aryan who went to west after defeat from Sudas the king of Bharat tribe some 7000 years ago. So these people have genetically and cultural similarity. This western always say middle East nonsense. Mittani were Aryan along with Hittites who capture land and ruled after they reached there. Some thousands later we see different tribes in Europe who went there from South asia
A bunch of weirdos in the comment section saying he has a political agenda because of the humans out of Africa theory. I don't think these people are able to comprehend basic science.
It was not farmers who first started farming. It was hunter gatherers who started it. Hunter gather culture lived thousands of year beside farming culture. There wasn't "sudden change" as many people are easily miscalculating. Population growth tells most of the story: from 2-4 million to 170 million during first 8 000 years.
Of course the genetic studies will bring many new material for historians , and it is a shame that in my country France it is forbidden to make genetic studies ...
we wuz kangz n shiiit
@@gooduH786 If one is an asshole for wanting their ethnicity to survive then I think you'll find we are all assholes.
Sigmund Bosch french ethnicity exist, it is just not defined by genetics but by culture. Genetically there is not much in common between a Basque, a breton, a picard or a provençal... all are french but genetically different
@@fablb9006 The french can be defined genetically. Also, conflating the small differences between Basque and Bretons and enormous differences between Africans and French is very dishonest. Genetics and culture go hand in hand. Culture passes from parents to children as do genes. But genes themselves also affect culture.
@@markkuuss According to the narrator; we were gods. Genetically, you were formed in my image. What continent do you find actual homosapien sapiens with no genetic admixture from earlier primates? And you're a genetic admixture of that sprung up 5,000 years ago; but you claim historical events that took place 6,000 yrs ago; go figure. Since you seem to be interested in genetics, you're aware that pigment derives from melanin? Two black people can produce a white baby; doesn't work the other way around kid.
Krause is a great teacher!
How did humans look like 7'000 years ago physically...compare to us their phenotypes ( First Farmers and Steppe Pastoralists ) for example???
Based on their skeletons, the men were super studly, like very elite athletes. They would kick sand in Arnold's face. But by three thousand years ago, they were looking a lot more like us--wimpy, relatively speaking.
@@michaels4255 What made us all wimpy? 🤔
@@Beldoras convenient life.
great video thanks!
"We know humanity started in Africa". Which proof do you have for this statement?
If you do not know the answer to that.
You are way too ignoramous on this topic... and it would require a vast amount of educating material to bring you any closer to understanding why he said that.
@@dinsel9691 There are proof and indication. Even if there is great indication it doesn't make it a truth.
Please further your education. Your lack of it is quite evident.
Can you please share with us- What Y dna genetic markers you have for the indigenous Europeans, the anatolians and the migrating Asians please!?🙏🏽🙏🏽
i am a polynesian from the c haplogroup, I am pretty certain on the "out of sunda land theory" for indigenous Europeans, Americans, Australians, oceanian, ainu and jomon, and North African berbers im dating it to be in sundaland around at least 45,000 years ago and migrating 12500 years ago after world cataclysm in sundaland.
This is based off dna, archaeology, linguistics and cultural history and arts.
Indigenous Europeans are ydna I2 and I1
@Tuetonic Knight and what about the r1b gene?
@@medit8iv_native970 Well r1b and r1a come out of P ( P = Q & R ) which I think comes from the south east Asian region, but Q and R emerging in north eurasian regions. But indigenous Europeans are I1 and I2 being the only haplogroup that originated in Europe. Minor haplogroups in Europe in anceint times were ydna C , but they became almost non existent and not indigenous.
Haplogroup I , comes from IJ which was likely in the anatolia region, and I split off in europe, thus becoming " indigenous " and mutating specifically in Europe.
And berbers are ancestrally a diverse population. They're ydna is E1B1B, which originated in east africa. And up to 15000 years ago, many north Africans were 2/3 iberomaurisan/natufian and 1/3 west African. So not all of north Africans are non african in origin. Also consider that coastal north africans are eurasian looking, yet the interior and other parts are brown and black. Humanity is diverse and not linear at all.
@@SimpleMinded221 you understand haplogroup c was around in a time in the first migrations? Were g,h,I come off f, whic is located in south west India, f comes off cf were it's a sibling to haplogroup c. These lines were from the migration 70,000 years ago. You need to update your maps and data bank from familytreedna instead of the outdated data you're using. Familytreedna is also the largest y dna bank in the world and is the most current 👍🏽 its actually pretty easy to tell where everyone comes from, using the out of sundaland method 🤙🏾 and knowing the geograph back to the start of the last ice age.
Proto Indo European should be called Aryan. Its should be known that way as part of our heritage. Stop hiding history. Bloodlines can be tracked too. So can symbols
Please consider expanding your research to the Native Americans to either support or refute their claims as reflected in their myths. This would include both North and South America. Thank you.
A lot of the studies are done at universities in Europe, I think the universities in the Americas need to do what you want. ruclips.net/video/Dk65TbJRN_A/видео.html
We came from East Asia, mostly Siberia.
They're working on it. Making up for past mistakes of others is one problem. Another is getting approval from Native Americans to make sources available to work with.
@@guidoylosfreaks And before that????
How much African DNA is present in Northern European whites?
*(European whites have African DNA because of their colonization of Africa and their involvement in the Slave Trade.)
Very little.
the cluster of African DNA is very far away from the rest of the world. Hence the theory Out of Africa is debunked.
Agriculture and the move to plant based diets was not a good revolution as genetically people cannot eat that diet. A lot of people suffer from obesity and type 2 diabetes because of moving away from eating meat.
the switch to agriculture was a bad move because it threw away thousands of years of evolution....not because of plant based diets.....hunter-gatherers actually ate a lot of plants and the main thing killing people in the western world is cardiovascular disease which is from eating too much meat. Hunter-gatherers would've ate no where near the amount of meat that modern humans eat and that is the problem.....don't forget that agriculture includes animals and farming animals for meat.
@@physlift9175 The issue of increasing levels of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity is not caused by meat. That is the lie propagated by vegans and unscientific physicians. There is no scientific evidence that meat causes cardiovascular disease. There is increasing evidence that the current reliance on plant based diets high in carbohydrates and seed oils we have never eaten before the 20th Century is the cause of these diseases. Listen to videos of Dr. Shawn Baker and Dr. Ken Berry. Argue with them.
If it wasn't for the move to agriculture we would all be brown skinned, and there would be no racism. Too late to go back in time, and tell the European populations unfortunately 😂
It's actually out of Europe, into Africa and back into Europe. The only three hominids that humans could come from are all from Europe. Why these people never mentions this is a mystery to me.
Interesting brief discussion of long-term genetics. A map might have helped those silly people like me who still need a map to remember exactly where Anatolia is. But really, how many Europeans know exactly where Nebraska is without consulting a map? Thanks for the informative presentation, very well done research and presentation.
Google
How does this reconsile with the studies that show the genetic difference between populations of people are less than 1% and that there is no definitive shared genetic trademark shared between all the people from one group?
They have been investigating exactly those
There are over 3 billion base pairs in the human genome, 1% of that is still a lot
@@soffiastefansdottir5719 Its less than one percent actually. Like what ? .2 to .4 percent ? Its not a lot. Humanity is one race/species along a spectrum
hello im from anatolia and i have a quite heterogenous haplogroup
Mazel tov!
Wow! There is more to come!
What do you mean? Immigration crisis?
I do not agree with chronology that people came from Africa and went to Europe first then Asia and lastly Australia. When people left Africa they went Australia, the Asia, Europe and finally America. Personally I think that is why we have aborigines people in Australia. I hate to say this but it is very disturbing to see the scientific racism in which everything has to be about Europe first.
What a great mind. And presented in a second language.
I have often wondered how genetics determined what a particular indigenous group was. For example I'm thinking of people taken from Africa and sold in to slavery in America. This sort of thing must have happened in other places too.
The move from hunter gathering to farming is likely to have left traces in our DNA. A successful person in each group is likely to have different skills.
Trevor Matthews Trevor Matthews Please don’t believe what you’ve been taught about yourself. Your history has been hidden for a very powerful reason. If you are a descendant of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade (in West Africa) you are most likely Hebrew (race not religion) and not descended from African people (The son’s of Ham)
Your history has been hidden for a very specific reason. In 70AD after the Roman Empire attacked Jerusalem, many fled into W Africa where they were sold by Africans. This is why you were initially called Negroes, not African (because you are not). Then the name was changed to Colored, Afro American, African American, now currently Black. Your history book is The Holy Bible; & an account of the slave Trade is in Deuteronomy 28 starting at chapter 68
Trevor Matthews Begin here: ruclips.net/video/zBiOmW8Hn4g/видео.html 👈👈👈
@@007mia7 We talking about facts here, don't you hear the man explaining accuretely genetics shifts with genetics FACTS backing up his claims!!!!
You guys are all over spreading lies and fairy tales, what this video has to do with that " Hebrew Isralites " BS???
@@007mia7 you are brainwashed by black extremists
Warum spricht er nicht deutsch ? Soll die breite Masse in Deutschland nicht verstehen was er von sich gibt.
Es ist sehr unhöflich, auch seinem Land gegenüber.
Can we roughly tell the % of each of the three genetic components just from our phenotype? There is a classification of people based on personal colors (the color seasons) and from physical features (the Kibbe classification). Can these methods have a link to the genetic % of our three main ancestor groups?
To some degree. The phenotypes associated with Southern Europeans are an indicator of more Neolithic farmer DNA and Northern Europeans with Yamnayan DNA. Although the varying degrees and level of accuracy hasn't been fully explored. If it was de politicized, I'd love to see how phenotypes match up with DNA tests.
It is said, that the indigenous western european hunter & gatherers contributed the blue eyes to europeans.
@@marcopony1897 It is also said the Steppe people from Central Asia contributed the blue eyes and blond hair to Europeans.
Are they referring to caucasians in africa or black africans??
interesting but the end is overdone
Very interesting and very well explained.
Extend this studies towards iranians, indians and central asians first
Are IE genetically related and where is the origin of IE
I think Yamnaya are not the aryans but one of aryans population or a sister population or a derived one from aryans
Yamnaya are not of indian origin
I just want to say that indoeuropeans are more complex and cant be reduced just to Yamnaya
They are, google R1 haplogroup
the ie origins is south asia , teritories around caspian sea
R1 is more older than PIE and splitted thousands of years before, but from what i see PIE have both R1a and R1b, but R1b is older in europe than PIE
PIE origin cant be south asia because, there is some european DNA type (easterm most) in India (most in IE speakers, high castes and males) but almost nothing specific Indian specific DNA in europeans (like H for male lineage and M for female lineage) except some gipsy influences
Caspian Sea has nothing to do with South Asia, is just a junction between East Europe and Central Asia
The idea that there wasn't an acknowledgement of a cultural influx from the steppe 5000 years ago is flatly bogus. That's the entire JP Mallory model for how the Indo-European languages got to Europe, by stark contrast to Colin Renfrew's Anatolian model.
"Those people" from the asian steppe are called Aryans or Indo-Europeans. Why does he refrain from mentioning their name?
Aryans are another name for indo-Iranians, the whole group is called indo european
@@extratropicalcyclone8567 The Aryans were removed from Iran and moved into Europe
Well you see, there was this guy named Hitler who did and said some things during WW2, and since then it has been unpopular, especially amongst Germans to acknowledge their supposed "Aryan" origin. (There's also a limit on what you can say and publish without "special interest" groups trying to censor you, perhaps understandably after what happened last time). The Hindu nationalist movement is also resistant to believing the Aryan migration hypothesis because it leads to the conclusion that Aryans build ancient Indian civilization and the dravidians were lower caste, or slaves.
@@Krawn_ yes but the R1 haplotype remains in Iran, so they didn't all migrate.
It sounds as if the author of this video is a scholar of Soros 's open society and stop culture ? Wir sind alle dasselbe Brei !
5:11 - "of people that live in the Near East TODAY" -- WRONG. Anatolian Farmers were already European-like in Anatolia and nothing like modern-day Near Eastern peoples:
Mathieson et al. 2015, p. 2. "Anatolian Neolithic samples do not resemble any present-day Near Eastern populations but are shifted towards Europe, clustering with Neolithic European farmers (EEF) from Germany, Hungary, and Spain."
Wonderful presentation!!!
Now changing fast due to major world immigration into Europe, their are provinces in Spain with minority both parents spaniards
this is all politics (politrix). IE did not come from Ukraine or Russia. It came from Greece, before that Anatolia, before that Armenian Highland/Caucasia, and the northern Middle East.
See also Videos from David Reich and also this recent article from him in NY Times :
David Reich : " “Whites” are not derived from a population that existed from time immemorial, as some people believe. Instead, “whites” represent a mixture of four ancient populations that lived 10,000 years ago and were each as different from one another as Europeans and East Asians are today" (How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’, NY Times, 23 March 2018)
www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html
Pro tip: The skeletons with adidas are eastern european
I can eat tons of dairy
So what was the physical appearance of these 3 groups?
Can you do one on East Asians??? The eye shape phenotype was it really born from cold windy conditions or did it happen way before they left Africa?
I like Professor Krause's conclusion: That he and his genetic studies, and publications thereof, are giving a voice to millions of people who didn't "have a history." Maybe they were too busy working, and surviving, to invent writing and to write books! I greatly appreciate Professor Krause's efforts, to bring his findings to people like me, who "occasionally resemble barbarians"!: I was very busy studying engineering as a young man, and making a living from it during my middle years, and so now I'm "hearing ancient voices" ! Thank you, RUclips, and Professor Krause.
Amazing how a bit of science can stir up so many emotions . We're watching a bit of genetics/history information and it seems to me we've never learned from history.Perhaps is better to have comments turned off for these sort of vids
We support a lively discussion and will keep the comment function open to anybod, but will delete comments which are disrespectful or discriminatory. Thanks for watching our LT-Videos :)
I certainly do not intend to contradict many of the comments which are extremely positive; the gentleman is obviously very competent but I find personally that this is very general and abstract, the exemple of Germany being the exception. Otherwise, it tends to remain very theoretical
Fuck can’t this guy talk without hands just for one second?
*Caution Researchers,* when preparing your Research Study Subject Question and Foundation, it is essential that one follow precisely the Scientific Ethics and Standards of Researvh Methodologies and Data Analysis, beginning with the title of the subject and including any "presumptions, as they must have full factual foundation".
Example: here he mentions a reference which includes a presumption that does not qualify and fully accepted, Peer Review Journal Standard, as fact and that is:
... all out of Africa "Theory"
It should be a "dah!"
But we often make these blooms without Conscious Thoughts.
On the subject, that theory is losing thrust. The evolution theory having been realized as inaccurate due to genetic studies the missing link was a DNA tweak 200,000 years ago.
Gregg Braden spoke to this and it can be viewed on his Channel.
Genetists are proving to be the link we needed to bring facts to the forefront and hopefully Mainstream Academics can adjust and get on the more Authentic Page. Human DNA a source of vast Facts. Thrilling to now and to History.
Best Wellbeing all ...
Hi there... how are you doing? Hope you are fine and staying safe?
Why do people continue to LIE like this guy on this video? SO much of what he claims is UNPROVEN! I hate that since some will readily believe it
Hes not
Pastoralists? More like gruesome warriors. They're called indo-europeans (yes, like 90% of the languages of Europe) and were known earlier in history as Aryans (Oy Vey!)
He takes a long tie to say what he wants to say
He wasn't wearing a tie.
Claudia Duma
2 months ago
Do people dislike Europeans? The fact that older human bones in the Balkans (Europe) were found is ignored of course! But i guess this video is old because this article originally from University of Toronto is from May 2017.
“7.2-million-year-old pre-human remains found in the Balkans” - “New hypothesis about the origin of humankind suggests oldest hominin lived in Europe”
here is the source: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm
Nobody hates europeans, and the article says pre humans, not humans. Basically something like a proto chimp. Noone disagrees that pirimates could have been more wide spread than today. But OOA is more plausible due to haplogroup age and distribution ages
I-E history b/w 2nd millennium BC. & 1st millennium CE.
Read how dark haired Vedic warrior caste (Shatriyas) conquered Iran-MiddleEast, Anatolia, Mediterranean, Europe, Great steppe, Southeast asia. First Mittani-Hatti Shatriyas conquered MiddleEast-Anatolia in 2nd millennium BC., their invoked deities are purely RgVedic. No I-E history predates them outside India. Greek-Macedonian, Roman, Medes all derived from them. Iranian & Greek history starts where M-H history ends. Roman elites were direct descendants of Mittani, Ramos-Ramulas came from there. Eastern Iran was ruled by Persian, Parthian, Sassanian Shatriyas. All Iranic rulers bore Sanskrit name/title. All earliest Greek frescoes are dark haired/eyed, their chariot, astronomy, astrology, art, architecture, Literature, script, cremation all came from Vedics. There's no possibility GR share common origin with Celtic blonde tribals whom they labelled subhum@n, b@rbaros.
👉Other Shatriyas first conquered the great steppe, then conquered SE Europe where they met Greeks & various blonde tribals including Celts, Slavs. First Cimme-Aryas in around 10th c. BC. Then Scythians>Sarmatians> Roxolanis>Alanis. One Sauromata branch landed in British isles before Roman, fought J. Caeser in 1st c. BC. with horse riding warriors, perhaps with chariots, can come only from Shatriyas, primitive tribals can't reach that level of disciplined warfare. Boudicca who fought Roman fiercely can only be Sauromata origin, no other women warrior have greater reputation than Scytho-Sauromatas. The Legendary King Arthur of Britain was Sauromata origin. Same story goes with every nation from Russia to Spain-North Africa. Later Norse, Goths, Vandals, Suebis were their political groups, they found earliest kingdoms of each location in post Roman Europe. In passage of time they interbred with blondes & got blondized yet brown haired/eyed population can be seen across Europe. TochaAryas, Kushans conquired Northern China, Tibet. Huns who stormed into Europe are TochaArya-Kushan offshoots. Again there's no possibility these steppe Shatriyas share common origin with Celtic & other blonde tribals. Shatriya blood can be found in Chinese, Turk, Mongol, Tibetian & various steppe tribals. TochaAryas penetrated deep into China, perhaps they were the first ruling dynasty, they introduced Chariot to Chinese, Chinese monarchy starts in around 10th c BC.
👉As for Southeast Asia, G. E.Gerini in his "Researches on Ptolemy's Geography of Eastern Asia.“ stated: "From the Brahmaputra and Manipur (Indian States) to the Vietnam, we can trace a continuous string of petty states ruled by those scions of the Kshatriya race,....
". As per Gerini earliest Shatriya kingdom goes back to 10th c BC. In Burmese tradition Abhiraja is the first king.
👉Religion & culture: After Mittani-Hatti in 2nd millennium BC. Indra was replaced by Mitra all thru 1st millennium BC. to 5th c. CE. Median, Roman, Parthian & other bordering kingdoms of Iran worshipped Him. Mitraism was state religion of Roman. Sun God was Greek version of Mitra. Rulers, nobles of Iranian world & border region bore Mitradata (giver of Mitra) name frequently. Zoroastrianism was created on Mitraism around 7th c. BC. RigVedic Hari cult also flourished, Lydian, Scythian, Greco-Roman worshipped Him. Hari+Kula, Sanskrit "Kula"=Clan or follower, corrupted into Herakle, Hercules. Greek Zeus is corruption RgVedic Dyus, other deities are also derived from RgVedic. Norse Odin is Dayus, Thor is Indra. It must be noted, they're not Germanic deities, Germany was formed by Norse, Sauromata & Alani. Southeast Asian deities are mostly Pouranic (Hindu) yet Indra's motifs are seen frequently. It must be noted, RigVedic Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Nasatya are the earliest name of I-E deities found in inception of 2nd millennium BC. (treaties b/w Mittani & Hatti). long separation created the differences what we see, they all developed as per their own taste & environment yet the family resemblance never lost. Greco-Roman, Norse's funerary rite used to be cremation, also some evidence of Goths' cremation, cremation is exclusive to Vedics. Norse is nothing but corrupted version of Vedic mythology. Vedic Asur-Deva is Aesir-Vanir. "Edda" is some collection of Veda Suktas. Their timber architecture share striking similarities with India. Norse introduce ship building technology & navigation there. Scandinavia came from lord Shiva's son Scanda+Nauv, Sanskrit "Nauv"=Ship, thus the ship sailed to the new land was named "ScandaNauv"> Scandinavia. Sanskrit "Shatra"(Shatriya), Greek "Shatrap", old Iranian "Shayatiya", Persian "Sha" share common meaning Kingship, authority, governing.
👉Celtic & other blonde tribals migrated from Yamnaya to Europe 3-4k years back. They are passive race, had they been martial race they would've stormed towards prosperous Middle East & South Asia. Those who sacked Rome in the BC's & CE's were from Shatriyas SE Europe. They didn't even ride horse let alone having chariot. They've no history, no mythology, no literature, no sense of nationhood/monarchy, they were in tribalism as late as 5th-10th c. CE., r@ping women used to be their custom (ref. Tacitus, Ibn Fadlan), even human s@crifice. There's no evidence of their native language, the languages they speak today have come from Greco-Roman, Steppe Shatriyas. Only India, Iran, Greco-Roman had chariots. Even later expansionists were dark haired, like C. Columbus, N. Bonaparte etc.
👉Ethnology: Shatriyas were massive in height & girth, dark haired/eyed, olive to medium fair skinned. Greeks described king Porus was above 7' tall. Motif of Ashoka the great & Iranian Shatriyas are seen larger than the rest as well. All early Greek, Scythian, Sauromata frescoes are found dark haired/eyed. As per Tacitus, G-R were taller than northerners. So called Germanic warriors Vandal's earliest images are found dark haired/eyed. After Roman conquest around 1st c BC. Shatriyas bred with blonde tribals as a result we can see uneven distribution of brunette & blonde across Europe. Intercaste marriage in India-Iran brought the changes in size, form & loss of martial quality.
👉Everything sprung out of India. Aryan=Vedic, Vedic=Aryan. RgVeda is no less than 7k years, even after pulling down to 16th c BC. still it remains oldest of all I-E literature. Iranic "Gatha" came around 10th c. BC. Zoroastrian texts didn't come before 7th c. BC. Greek Iliad & Odyssey came not before 8th c. BC. India hosts 6.5k years old city "Rakhigarhi", also predates Sumerian cities. No civilization gave birth equal to Ashoka tg & Kurus tg, Xtianity could born only because Kurus tg saved Judaism from extinction, he's regarded "messiah" Judaic texts.
That's all history of Europe & great Steppe.
👉Read statements of some reputed western historians:
Will Durant, American historian.
"India was the motherland of our race, and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages: she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity; mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all."
William James, American Author "From the Vedas, we learn a practical art of surgery, medicine, music, house building under which mechanized art is included. They are encyclopedia of every aspect of life, culture, religion, science, ethics, law, cosmology and meteorology."
Yet Hungarians are very proud of being "magyar".
This is fascinating and I've been thinking about this for 20 of my 34 years of age. As a PHD in economics, I find I need more data from anthropologists during the 5k year bc plus time towards 1st evidence of homo sapiens. For example: Please explain why the Egyptian Sphinx was altered. The head doesn't match the scale of the body. A untrained child can see as much. Perhaps I'm wrong, but a gut inscinct tells me a larger sandstone head was recut. Therefore whomever built that area of Cairo, could be much earlier. Rationally, why would a society, out of the blue, architect something so precise as Giza. Hard to understand and I'm under the impression we have the info incorrect.
One reason for altering the Sphinx is probably erosion damage, another pure politics, and the wildcard is that it was damaged by asteroid bombardment....the only thing we know for sure is THAT it was altered, and that it is far older than the surrounding pyramids, and that it probably had a twin on the other side of the river, currently under water. We took away most the statues of Stalin and Lenin. We blew up a lot of swasticas after Hitler died. We will probably remove a lot of statues of Nathan Bedford Forrest soon. Who can say for sure why they altered the sphinx?
Would you be interested in a bone of possibly 900,000 years old to research its genetic makeup?
Such intelligent work.
Of course what you expect from Germany 🇩🇪 always great
Great Channel. thky
Thanks so much!
Too much talking and repetition instead of showing data and results
wow he really underplays the steppe herder admixture, you average German is like 30-40% Anatolian farmer, 40-50% steppe herder and 10-20% hunter gatherer, he must have gotten them mixed up, although he says in Spain only 5% come from steppe herders when its more like 25% so what is he on about?
The estimates of the percentages have changed. There is also more data available. Besides, steppe herder ancestry is also made up of European hunter-gatherer DNA, so this might make it difficult to differentiate them (note that his explanation is purposefully simplified).
That being said, he does make some clear mistakes. As you said, the percentage of steppe herder DNA in Spain is way too low (I believe even way too low for the Basque country). It may have been a result of the sample size. I also find it weird he refers to the steppe herders as Central Asians, when these peoples originated in the Western Eurasian steppes fully within Europe. They sure had native Central Asian ancestry though.
Key in to 3:32. " reconstructing the ancient genomes" which means they are recovering small fragments and essentially making up the rest. So there you have it; proof of no proof at all.
Out of Africa is coming under question.
No it it not,in the beginning he said out of Africa and all around the world.as for the early European Chang of DNA type means they where dark skin people before the caucus people move in... if you watch his other lecture he said white skin only been around max 6000 years.
@@ebonytv3414 yeah, also the ancestors of the "caucusus people" where dark skinned. So what are you talking about? All non-africans came from a single east african tribe... and as he said in the video, the dark skinned indigenous hunter & gatherers of europe are one of three main genetic components who formed modern day european populations. So what's exactly your point? The indigenous hunters are even phenotypically visible in modern day europeans. They gave europeans their blue eyes... think about that, when you see a blue eyed person of european descent the next time. The people with the highest amount of indigenous european hunter descent live in the baltics and scandinavia btw. And they aren't kangz... so what is your mission here?
@@marcopony1897 What you on( Kangz )Think you need to spell,glad you know you come from Africans,without Africans you would not be hear...
or only hungarian dont change their language and the other countrys were assimilated.
Who says we speak INDOeuropean or that Hungarian or Turkish (coming from hitites) or Sumerian is not European? It is. The Greek language is not.
How long will the agenda persist?
Yes we did invent farming in the Europe. Where else?
Some have more admixture with East Asians, Middle Easterners, North Africans, Sub Saharans, Ashkenazim, And Gypsy
all have admixture with East Asians
It's all basically eurasian, Anatolian and hunter gatherers including Ashkenazim, Sephardim and Mizrachi, Romoni, Arab.
Northern Africa DNA originated in Eastern Africa proper DNA from Lower Africa is present in Northern Africa too.
@@natanyaaberra4984 modern north africans came from near east 12000 years ago and mixed with the ancient north africans who were only 1/3 sub saharan/east african. Today's north africans have only 10% sub saharan dna.