Another great video! I think if possible ALL proficient pilots should fly with Jeppessen charts (but alas, they are ridiculously expensive). I fly LNAV+V often on the West Coast and the advisory GS will provide a much more stable approach into tough urban airports with obstacles. Thanks for showing us that the advisory GS WILL NOT lead you below step down mins..,many are wary to use is due to that fear. Dive and Drive is so yesterday! CDFA is the way to go...good enough for part 121 good enough for me! Awesome channel...best succinct explanations for complex topics!
I asked on another video but more pertinent here - On LNAV+V, At what point does the vertical glide path intercept the MDA? Isn’t it at the VDP if published? This is a question in the FAA IPC Guidance document. Thanks!!!
Exactly! I'm sparing with Dan now over on his RUclips channel. He's adamant that Garmin snaps a new glide path at every fix. This he says is the reason the 208 crashed at KBYI. According to Dan, the pilot pushed the nose over to follow a "new" advisory glide path at a step down fix and flew into an obstacle. Now he's saying that it's the fault of the obstacle.
Please do a video to refute Dan Gryder's theory about the Caravan accident at KBYI last April. I believe that the GPS runway 20 approach was +V at the time. The pilot hit a 100' stack at GEM processing, while flying at 75 agl, 2500 feet from the runway. Gryder blames the G1000, the GEM stack, the FAA and the airport.
![Kumamoto Masters Japan 2024 | Gregoria Mariska Tunjung (INA) [5] vs. Akane Yamaguchi (JPN) [2] | F](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EIjZybhsWqA/mqdefault.jpg)
I have 25,000 hours... and I learn from your videos. Thanks!
Another great video! I think if possible ALL proficient pilots should fly with Jeppessen charts (but alas, they are ridiculously expensive). I fly LNAV+V often on the West Coast and the advisory GS will provide a much more stable approach into tough urban airports with obstacles. Thanks for showing us that the advisory GS WILL NOT lead you below step down mins..,many are wary to use is due to that fear. Dive and Drive is so yesterday! CDFA is the way to go...good enough for part 121 good enough for me! Awesome channel...best succinct explanations for complex topics!
Instrument rated pilot as of Saturday. Thank you 🙏🏼
This is a great explanation on how to use an understand an advisory glidepath
your videos are the best! thank you
Great advise. Thanks
Informative. Thank you.
Great video I always love your explanation
another great video
I asked on another video but more pertinent here - On LNAV+V, At what point does the vertical glide path intercept the MDA? Isn’t it at the VDP if published? This is a question in the FAA IPC Guidance document. Thanks!!!
Someone needs to phone Dan Gryder about this!
Exactly! I'm sparing with Dan now over on his RUclips channel. He's adamant that Garmin snaps a new glide path at every fix. This he says is the reason the 208 crashed at KBYI. According to Dan, the pilot pushed the nose over to follow a "new" advisory glide path at a step down fix and flew into an obstacle. Now he's saying that it's the fault of the obstacle.
Very well done.
What is the difference between
RNAV (GPS) and RNAV (RNP) approach plates.
RNP (required navigation performance) is for approved airlines only.
I’m sure you found it by now :)
Please do a video to refute Dan Gryder's theory about the Caravan accident at KBYI last April. I believe that the GPS runway 20 approach was +V at the time. The pilot hit a 100' stack at GEM processing, while flying at 75 agl, 2500 feet from the runway. Gryder blames the G1000, the GEM stack, the FAA and the airport.
That guy... Should just stop. Not well thought of in serious aviation circles.