When are you "Established" on an Instrument Approach | Instrument Approach Clearances | 91.175

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 янв 2025

Комментарии • 52

  • @Doornail23
    @Doornail23 Год назад +72

    Another great video! As of a few hours ago I passed my instrument check ride and can say without a doubt your RUclips videos helped so much!

    • @MuffinCHeeler
      @MuffinCHeeler Год назад +1

      Congrats.

    • @PaulthePilot55
      @PaulthePilot55 Год назад

      Nice! I’m just now starting my instrument training. What was the hardest part for you?

    • @masonmccall6591
      @masonmccall6591 Год назад +2

      @@PaulthePilot55I’m about 3/4 of the way done with my training. When I was getting started, the hardest part was learning to get accustomed how to fly without looking outside and looking only at instruments.

    • @abbieamavi
      @abbieamavi Год назад +1

      congrats!! Instrument is a major deal!!

    • @rickseeman5679
      @rickseeman5679 Год назад

      Instrument is the toughest

  • @mm10983
    @mm10983 Год назад +33

    Great video as always ! As an CFII I’m always making sure my students understand what “established”means. As you mentioned the FAA doesn’t provide clear guidance. However the military does. As a former F-15E WSO and instructor navigator we taught that established on a localizer is when the CDI comes off the wall just as you noted. I also make sure to include what established on a VOR means since they are much less sensitive and descending too soon can get you in trouble. We teach that establish on a VOR is 1/2 scale deflection of the CDI.

  • @firepilot109
    @firepilot109 Год назад +13

    Guys if you haven't signed up for this course you need too! I just passed my Instrument checkride and these videos were huge part of it! Great videos! Now onto commercial! Thanks again!

    • @vfx7t
      @vfx7t Год назад

      You, America; me, cursed Africa 🤣🤣🤣

    • @arctain1
      @arctain1 2 месяца назад

      Agreed.. this course was essential for my passing - and more importantly, understanding - IFR ops. It’s a great course!

  • @ervinghernandez2632
    @ervinghernandez2632 Год назад +2

    ¡Gracias!

  • @abbieamavi
    @abbieamavi Год назад +2

    yes! this is a very common issue I see students forgetting, and now that I'm a CFI, I'm trying to learn how to describe it to them so that it "sticks". thanks for this quick tip, great video :)

  • @Saml01
    @Saml01 Год назад +6

    Now to make sure the DPE's are aware of the definition of established and all will be peachy. Otherwise, for the check ride I'll just descend when the needle is centered.

  • @gonetoearth2588
    @gonetoearth2588 Год назад +2

    Awesome video. One point I would make in very busy workload situations is in this example you gave one should not necessarily be inclined to "dive" down to 5000 at WUGAG as its not a mandatory altitude. There is a chance for a high rate of decent that would have to be remedied when the GS comes alive. Staying a bit higher is safer and you will pickup the GS INSIDE WUGAG as you will be below GS.....IMHO controllers in busy Class B airspaces are quite pro to help you out as you predictably intercept an ILS...Keep the awesome vids coming!!!

  • @valehedgehog996
    @valehedgehog996 Год назад +1

    Thank you for the top notch knowledge that you provides, I am now a CPL and IR holder.

  • @DylanCannon
    @DylanCannon Год назад +1

    Great work Dan. I wouldn’t have passed my CFII without you.

  • @stuartcrutchfield8880
    @stuartcrutchfield8880 Год назад +1

    As always a very helpful video! You are great at explaining flying concepts. I have purchased some of your courses and they are also very helpful!

  • @nealhere
    @nealhere 11 месяцев назад +1

    Doesn’t the procedure turn go opposite the arrow not the way you showed it? Love your videos all the time.

  • @domaguayo7819
    @domaguayo7819 4 месяца назад

    On this very subject check out TWA flight 514 on 12/1/74. Misunderstanding about when to descend to final approach altitude. Confusion can be deadly. I had a similar clearance in the 70s while flying a Cessna 402 at night in upstate N.Y. Not sure how the altitude should be handled, I decided to arrive over the airport and then start my descent for the approach. Clearances back then weren’t as cut and dry as they are today. If you’re uncertain about the approach don’t be shy about asking when exactly to start down.

  • @mytech6779
    @mytech6779 8 месяцев назад

    If flying a GPS RNAV and you have correctly selected gps on the CDI, the nac unit will automatically adjust the CDI scale to the +-1NM requirment and autmatically sequence to the appropriate leg, only with both the leg active and within max scale will you be established. I suppose you could manually select the leg before getting there, like maybe if you are being vectored, in which case when the needle is alive then you are within the required lateral navigation performance for that leg because of the auto scaling. (Autoscaling is required for device certification and you can only manally set a tighter scale than what it would otherwise auto select.)

  • @jim_ratliff
    @jim_ratliff Год назад +3

    “The FAA definition of established on course requires the aircraft to be established on the route centerline.” FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook, Page 4-54, in the right hand column.

    • @flightinsight9111
      @flightinsight9111  Год назад +6

      Thanks! We could have included that but defining “established” by using the word “established” adds confusion. We fell back on the language that’s more regulatory in nature in the video.

    • @AV4Life
      @AV4Life 3 месяца назад

      This is what I always intuitively thought “established” meant

  • @oleksandrshevela7830
    @oleksandrshevela7830 Год назад +3

    Thanks!
    Does term “establish” apply to feeder routes?
    When can we descend to MEA feeder route?

    • @flightinsight9111
      @flightinsight9111  Год назад +2

      yes, we can apply this concept to any route, whether on an instrument approach segment, feeder route, en route airway, or STAR.

    • @marklindsey1995
      @marklindsey1995 4 месяца назад

      @@flightinsight9111 Pg 4-42 of the Instrument Procedures Handbook states "Feeder Routes, also referred to as approach transitions, technically are not considered approach segments"
      If I am on a feeder route, I am not technically established on an approach segment. 91.175(i) states when I am on an unpublished route or being vectored, I can descend when established on a segment of a published route or instrument approach procedure..... What happens when my flight plan is filed from the enroute to a feeder and then IAF? I am on a published route and not being vectored. If my last assigned altitude is higher than the feeder route, and I am cleared for the approach, I do not believe I am authorized to descend until passing the IAF. Is this in error?

  • @Flanksss
    @Flanksss Год назад

    I appreciate these videos a lot man, thank you

  • @jakew9887
    @jakew9887 Год назад

    Great presentation. Thanks

  • @_carminati_
    @_carminati_ 4 месяца назад

    Great video. How would a G1000 handle the procedure in a situation where you were coming in from sugar loaf? Does it automatically add the outbound leg and procedure turn?

  • @diaryrecorded5524
    @diaryrecorded5524 Год назад

    cool so as I understand then there are 2 definitions... half scale and when the need comes alive? THANK YOU!

  • @jeremiahstarke4516
    @jeremiahstarke4516 Год назад +4

    This video is how I busted my checkride which was descending before needle was centered on a lpv.

    • @kdeleon7047
      @kdeleon7047 Год назад

      Sorry to hear. Just curious, what exactly did the DPE say?

    • @freepilot7732
      @freepilot7732 8 месяцев назад +3

      He should not have busted.

  • @nicholasparker2086
    @nicholasparker2086 День назад

    Im guessing on this first approach when youre at 7000 you have to descend and cant wait for the glidslope because youre too high and far out for it to come in?

  • @FredericWuerth
    @FredericWuerth Год назад +1

    Does this also apply to being "established" in holds? Much like this video, I have heard many different answers to that question...

    • @OMARRIOO
      @OMARRIOO Год назад

      Established in a hold is something you report usually after your first inbound to outbound turn.

  • @AirspeedisLife
    @AirspeedisLife 11 месяцев назад

    does the ACS standard only apply to checkrides because it is like a grading sheet the examiner goes by on a checkride only?

  • @austinfick6241
    @austinfick6241 11 месяцев назад

    AIM calls for .3 nm on approach not 1nm at the end there just a heads up. Great video

    • @user-wl6bw3jl4n
      @user-wl6bw3jl4n 9 месяцев назад

      Is it 1 nm from initial approach to 0.3 nm for final approach, or 0.3 nm the entire approach?

  • @Brian-my1qi
    @Brian-my1qi Год назад

    If the LOC is 4 times more sensitive than a VOR, does that mean 2.5 dots on the CDI is full scale deflection?

    • @marklindsey1995
      @marklindsey1995 4 месяца назад

      No. Full deflection is to the wall. Full scale deflection of a VOR is 12 degrees or more (each dot is 2 degrees. The last dot is 10 degrees.). Full scale deflection of a LOC is 2.5 degrees (each dot is 0.5 degrees).

  • @cholubaz
    @cholubaz 10 месяцев назад

    I was just asking this question the other day

  • @savagecub
    @savagecub 11 месяцев назад +4

    CDI ?.......CDI ? Do current instrument students even know what that is ?

  • @therealm27
    @therealm27 11 месяцев назад

    One nit picky point. When you say you're about 14 miles out I think the rule of 60 would say you're just inside 1/4 mile. So I think you'd be less than 1300 feet. I enjoyed the explanation you gave and research into ICAO.

  • @bullseyes1983
    @bullseyes1983 Год назад +3

    I'm just a VFR pilot, but always assumed that "established" means when the needle comes alive, or de LOC is engaged. It seems like I can keep doing it this way in the sim xD

  • @vfx7t
    @vfx7t Год назад +4

    In the past, my dream was to become a pilot, but now, my only wish is to acquire a powerful enough computer to fully appreciate the magnificence of FS2020. Given the high cost of this computer equipment, I still content myself with flying on FSX and Xplane 11. ;D

    • @SerenityMusicOasis
      @SerenityMusicOasis Год назад +4

      At least in MSFS you don't need to become an aeronautical lawyer to enjoy the skies! 😅

    • @vfx7t
      @vfx7t Год назад

      @@SerenityMusicOasis You know, I've had a great passion for flight simulators for 34 years. I've always managed to stay up to date since the simulator's creation on Amstrad in 1988, up until FSX. However, this time with FS2020, I was caught off guard. I couldn't keep up due to the high cost of its required configuration. Thank you ;))

    • @seattleboatguy
      @seattleboatguy Год назад

      @Jon Dow : Interestingly enough, as I was watching this video, I was thinking "man, you're got to be a lawyer to remember all this stuff". Pilots sure have to cram a lot of regs into their brain.

    • @firepilot109
      @firepilot109 Год назад +3

      For price of about 3 flight lessons you can by a super nice gaming computer! I just passed my Instrument rating and now I sit on edge of taxiway with sign saying I will wash their planes for AVGAS money!!! lol FS2020 is awesome and it helps me with all my ratings and when we fly to new locations I will jump on there and fly it 1st .

    • @theMerzavets
      @theMerzavets Год назад

      I bought XBOX Series X exclusively for MS FS 2020. It is highly recommended to use joystick and any cheap USB keyboard and mouse.
      There are some limitations in comparison with PC version, but look: for just $500 you get great peace of hardware. Looks like PC with the same perf score will cost you two or even three times more.