Who Buried Paul? 1999 Who Killed Paul McCarthy? Brian Moriarty
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2013
- Who Buried Paul? 1999 Who Killed Paul McCarthy?
ludix.com/moriarty/paul.html
The opinions expressed in the interviews included in Who Buried Paul? are those of the participants.
The images and sounds on this web resource are the property of their respective copyright holders, and are included here for educational purposes.
I'm an artist and make a living doing portraits. I guarantee you, these two faces are not...NOT. ..the same, pre and post 1966. The new guy is NOT the same guy from pre 66. I believe my own eyes before anything else, and the post 66 guy is NOT the original Paul. Screw the clues, he's not the same guy, absolutely, period! Bet my life on it.
The changes in 'Paul's' music should be obvious to anyone with any musical sense.
The problem is that the current generations have no conception of how absolutely insanely popular The Beatles were. Too much money was involved. Wake up, Lennon was warned to quit leaving clues then he was shot. George opened his mouth and his mansion was broken into. Ringo needs to speak up.
This guy is a paid schill. One doesn't need clues hidden in album covers to know. Just study the Beatles live concerts from they began until the end of 1966 and take notice of Paul. He was a genius performer, he had an aura of likeability that just oozed out of him whether he was performing or in interviews. Then look at the concert they recorded on the roof and don't even try to tell me that that is the same Paul.
Who is Paul McCARTHY!! when you are doing a biographical account start with getting the name right.
During the Decmeber 9th 2017 concert at Brisbane, Australia; Paul reads a sign in the audience which read: I was at Shae 1965. His immediate comment to this was; "hmmm, before my time." Why would he say this?
Wouldn't this be world shocking if this truth really did come out..... why do you think Heather Mills was in fear of her life when she found out....?? Remember what she said on a TV interview about certain insurances she has in case she is taken out....
He's talking about Paul is not dead. Well for all we know he may be alive and on an island somewhere. We don't have proof one way or the other. If he's dead RIP ..Paul WE LOVE AND MISS YOU. However the issue here is that we know that Paul McCartney Was replaced with Billie Shears- Campbell Shepherd whatever name he goes by..and that is a fact. Its in plain sight for everyone to see. And if you cant see it take those blinders off. And you too Mr Brian Moran
Another Great Documentary is Called “The Winged Beatle” it’s one of the best films about The Beatles to date and a must see for everyone that is a true fan of The Beatles. . . If you still have any doubts after watching that all you need to do is have another look at the colour film footage in the movie called “HELP” and compare it to the magical mystery tour colour film footage. . . However, it’s much easier to have a look at a video Called “Paul is Dead/ Faul McCartney/ Plastic Macca On Waxe Radio w/Tina Foster. . The side by side photographic evidence is some of the best. . Only the smart ones know that James Paul McCartney was replaced with Billy Shears. .
Do any of you know what The Tavistock Institute is and what they do?
As a young adult a saw a short film been shown in the news in which
Take any two pictures of Paul and Faul and measure the distance from eye pupil to pupil and then draw a perpendicular from that line between the eyes to the bottom of the top front teeth and you will get a ratio. Convert the ratio to a number where the eye to eye distance is always 1.0 relative to the line to the teeth and you will get a number such as 1.15 to 1.17 for Paul and a number like 1.015 to 1.045 for Faul. This is a ratio that does not change throughout life. Two different looking people may have the same ratio, but the odds are less that a double will have the same ratio. This is how they spotted the Hillary Clinton double Theresa Barnwell.
What about the fact Faul is at least 3 inches taller...he has Hazel eyes unlike Pauls brown eyes, his hair parts on the opposite side, his face is clearly longer in length, he has 6 toes etc...etc...
You are limiting your explanations to clues which were on the four records. Well, let me this. I was 17 y.o. when Paul disappeared. I was in France, and there, the craze was not caused by the american rumours, or the clues on the records. We weren't aware of these. But, what we were aware of, is that when Paul 'returned', not from the dead, we started to question it his appearances. He was much taller, his head was longer and thinner, his eyes different, well in one word, Paul was 'different', and we all suspected that this was not Paul. But what is it. Too naive then in playing detectives, we left it to that.
He forgot George Harrison's "He never wore his shoes, we all know he was dead."
In 2015 Ringo Starr confirmed that Paul is really dead.
I think what is interesting is Wired Magazine hired a forensic firm to put this matter to rest once and for all as the magazine believed this was in fact all nonsense. They did all the typical tests like voice, face, (bone structure), ears and teeth analysis. The forensic team and the people at Wired were all shocked by the results. On the voice analysis
By making fun of something serious, you create doubt. This is a common technique used and thought by physiologists. Great technique to deceive a person or a mass of people.
McCartney of course... but it's always interesting when the Tavistock and other institutes get desperate to suppress something they get out a tool like this to talk about it.
In an exclusive interview with the Hollywood Inquirer, Mr. Starr explained that the “real” Paul McCartney had died in a car crash on November 9 1966, after an argument during a Beatles’ recording session. To spare the public from grief, the Beatles replaced him with a man named William Shears Campbell, who was the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest and who happened to have the same kind of jovial personality as Paul.