How the Rumor That Paul McCartney Died in 1966 and Was Replaced Got Started
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 апр 2016
- →Subscribe for new videos every day! ruclips.net/user/TodayIFo...
→How "Dick" came to be short for 'Richard': • How Dick Came to be Sh...
Never run out of things to say at the water cooler with TodayIFoundOut! Brand new videos 7 days a week!
More from TodayIFoundOut
Keanu Reeves Gives Away Millions ... and 6 other Celebrity Facts
• Keanu Reeves Gives Awa...
When Humans Started Shaving Different Parts of Our Bodies
• When Humans Started Sh...
In this video:
The rumor began in the winter of 1967 when, after a particularly icy night, reports were flying among Britain’s national press that Paul had been killed in a car crash on January 7, 1967. The tale was reported in the February issue of The Beatles Monthly Book (#43) under the heading of “False Rumour,” and with a denial from the Beatles’ press office. In fact, it claimed that neither Paul nor his black Mini Cooper had even left the house that day.
Want the text version?: www.todayifoundout.com/index.p...
Sources:
www.mirror.co.uk/usvsth3m/7-co...
news.google.com/newspapers?id...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bea...
ddr.lib.drake.edu/cdm/ref/coll...
www.gadflyonline.com/archive/M...
news.google.com/newspapers?id...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_is...
michigantoday.umich.edu/a7565/
Ready to learn more fun facts about famous people? Then check out this video and find out more about how Mark Twain Was Born and Died in the Same Years That Halley’s Comet Flew By the Earth:
ruclips.net/video/INcT_zmxgAA/видео.html
Today I Found Out It was just fans having fun and the Beatles went with it.
I'm parked cars look-alike, so the part of car for look-alike Department of parks look-alike soap armored car for look-alike four years ago he died in car crash and then they never respected surrounded he was and he was dumb do camels talk show host that I'm asking for placement of upon the car feet tip replacement aparcar think passing so he said I buried Paul Library Paul can you put backwards purple is parvo is dead how do you replace him in 5 seconds if I look like an hour of 45 seconds left before Paul McCarthy be placed by actual if her, still alive or you he called me 55 years old and still be a lot in it the weather like is out there he's trying to be like Kim and then the teacher so much that's exactly how many resumes of proper carving he's smile slugs face he's measuring something peace peace Behavior movements of Alibaba stock like him it's just like it just bought a car look alike or somebody else replacing
The last Testament of George Harrison...go watch.
Wreck was november 66
My best friend knew Paul. When they met again, Paul didn't even recognized him.
That is true. I have met 2 people in my life who had met both Pauls. Each time Paul (William Campbell) did not recall or recognize them. One guy was semi-internationally famous, Terry Knight (producer of Grand Funk Railroad & dated British model Twiggy). He wrote a song about the Pauls called “St. Paul.” You should listen on RUclips.
no way an extremely famous person who has met millions of fans during his life somehow does not remember them all 😧‼️ someone get tmz on this
@@loveless5515 And that's if what they're saying is true, which I seriously bet it isn't. And even if it was it is seriously laughable that the explanation they jump to is that Paul has been replaced by a clone hahahaaaa, rather than your explanation or really any other. Some people are jist incredibly gullible and believe anything
@@rambi1072yeah, like you! I bet you think we really went to the moon, right?😂
@@addo2419 Yes... obviously, you absolute imbecile.
Oh, and left handed people sometimes smoke with the righ hand cause they have to use the lighter on the left hand.
Definitely. I'm right handed and hold my cigarette in my left hand.
bridgetthewench Yeah, I am ambidextrous so it doesn't matter. But it's logical lmao
Me 2
During lighting it sure.. but there's no logical reason for continuing to use the hand you aren't dominant in after that point for the cigarette. I'd think most people would just switch hands at that point.
But anyway, loads of people use both hands for smoking.
Edit: Unless you want to keep your dominant hand free, for like, the computer mouse, tv controller, phone, fork, playing with your hair, more dexterous sassy hand gestures, etc.
There's no real reason to change either. Holding a cigarrette is not hard with any hand. Lighting a lighter is hard to do with your non-dominant hand.
The good thing about internet and youtube is we can replay footage : videoclips, live shows, interviews, albums...and with all that replay and analysing it is very clear: this crazy conspiracy theory somehow really happened. He was replaced, how crazy it might sound....it s a 100% true.
It has been reported some dictators have used doubles. They do it in Hollywood. It isn't that difficult on occasions and short term, and the only way they were able to pull it off for a while with the MOST famous band ever, was to reduce them to the studio only. Long before so much media to finally call it out, and put with the other three Beatles' lyrics telling us without spelling it out, well - there you have it.
Yup
You said Paul is the only Left-handed Beatle.
Wrong. Ringo Starr is Left-handed. Just saw him talk about it on Conan.
All of the Beatles were replaced with clockwork showroom dummies in 1964, as they could no longer afford to insure the real ones because of mobs of screaming women attacking them. The modern day Paul McCartney is actually an animatronic waxwork, part of his left ear is missing where they left him leaning by a radiator. If you play his album "Kisses on the Bottom" backwards, you can hear a voice saying "Paul is made of wax". On the cover of his album "London Town", there is a picture of Tower Bridge, which represents here the number 11, the total number of wax Pauls they had had made up to that date. In Scotland, the McCartney crest is two crossed swords; uncannily similar to Madame Tussauds, the waxwork makers. If you are looking for clues, you will see them everywhere.
This is amazing. It explains why Paul said "plastic soul" in one of the Anthology albums.
Troubled Sole purpose
GayCaballero cool story bro
Wait this is a joke right?
I agree
This is a very nice school project for story making, I like your imagination!
yeah, paul's dead. it's so nice that the everyone - family, friends, the other beatles - agreed to go along with it and accept this stranger into their lives while still grieving. jolly good of them all to keep completely silent for 50 years, despite the fact that any one of them could sell the story for a small fortune. better, instead, to leave ambiguous clues on the cover of an album (that actually would have sold many more copies if it were released posthumously) and put backwards messages into a song.
and thank _god_ they found an exact lookalike of paul, who also had the same voice and mannerisms. it was great of him to abandon all family and friends of his own, and convince them all to keep schtum (along with the doctor/s who declared the original paul dead, and police who attended the scene of the accident). people are so selfless!
I was convinced it was a hoax, but now you put it this way... :P
the rumor is he had no family and was an orphan
@MultiGK8 The imaginary Faul guy might have had no family, but McCartney certainly did.
Palefox pointed out, the grieving McCartney family was so nice to agree to accept Faul in their lives.
And, apparently, they were so kind to give Faul all the copyrights and profits of McCartney's work and name.
+MultiGK8 maybe he was an orphan. but what, he had no friends? work colleagues? neighbours? or someone, _anyone_, he had met over the years who would notice he had mysteriously disappeared?
There was a guy who went missing; the winner of a Paul McCartney imitation contest.
Wasn't there? At least, that's what I've heard as explanation.
The patch is O.P.P. its an Ontario Provincial Police badge not OPD
Rex Holes no such thing as canadian provisional police force .
OPP = Ontario Provincial Police. Although you're partly right - no such thing as Canadian Provisional Police force. LOL
William Shears was a member of Ontario Police. Interesting.
Mark Andrews yea. Billy was a part time cop. SO I QUIT THE POLICE DEPT. GOT MY SELF A STEADY JOB. Come on fans the evidence is over whelming. PID. RESEARCH for yourself. It is deep and very dark.
Dead in arrival
I have a memory that in the Autumn of 1966 one morning, while I was preparing to go to school, the BBC Home Service announced in the news that "reports are coming in that Beatle Paul McCartney has been involved in a serious car accident." As a dedicated Beatle fan (then and now) the impact on me was devastating, even though my first love was George. By the time I arrived at school, anxious that all my fellow classmates would be in tears as well, a friend said it was OK, it had been stated in a later bulletin that it had been a mistaken identity. However although it wasn't seen in the national newspapers (because they could afford to reprint the papers), it stopped the Liverpool papers (who could only run one edition) from publishing that day. It is thought that this is what the lyric "Wednesday morning papers didn't come" (Lady Madonna - March 1968) refers to. I have long thought that "Paul" looks "different." The eye colour is not the same. His stance is different. His whole body shape is bigger, whereas I remember Paul as always being slight. Having said that, I hold no grudges against the stand in, the effect on the world at the time of his alleged death (the height of Beatlemania) would have been catastrophic. That they thought they would get away with it has since been thwarted by two main events: the proliferation of colour televsion (extremely rare and not broadcast daily in the UK until early 1970s) and the internet, where experiences of everyone can be shared on channels such as this.
thanks for sharing. The beatles meant the world to me also. But I never believed this tale.
thanks for that. I just wanted to say something about this. You know how kids can see thru a ruse that adults get fooled by? When the Sgt. Peppers album came out, I was about 5. I loved the Beatles! and when my sisters showed me the new album I wanted to know who the new person was. I wanted Paul back not this guy. No one could convince me it was old Paul. It never "felt" right. We lived in the country with no access to tv and hardly newspaper and never heard about the rumors. Having Ringo's statement about Paul's death removed told me a lot.
hey mister can we have our ball back Camera work cannot change eyes from coffee brown (Paul's) to light hazel green (Faul's). Check the Sept 2017 issue of Rolling Stones Magazine to see this clearly.
Sian Powell I also remember hearing, in the late Autumn of 1966, that Paul died in a car accident. My friends and I had had forebodings about the Beatles being punished somehow for John's remark about them being more popular than Jesus. By that afternoon, the story had been retracted as a mistake. I agree that his facial appearance, hair, eye color, singing style and posture changed between 1966 and 67. If you see videos of Paul's bare feet, even they changed extremely from 1966 (small, straight pudgy toes) to 1967 (long toes, boney, bent toward midline of foot).
Nick Thompson nice!😂
It'd be like one of you meeting me, and you talk to me, hear my voice and then I don't see you for a year. If you saw me a year later, and my voice was deeper, I was slightly thinner or fatter, or I had my haircut or in a different style, it is really like that to me, the whole rumour.
" Hello Billy" "This is a William! You know him!"
Ringo was left handed too based on the set up of his drum kit.
RIngo is left-handed but plays a right-handed drum kit.
Exactly.
saffy blu So, RIngo is left-handed but plays a right-handed drum kit. It means whatever you want it to mean.
You idiots Ringo is NO left handed, only Paul was. You can set up a drum kit any way you want.
Dave Quinn You can set up a drum kit any way you want. But the fact remains that Ringo is left handed.
...I buried Paul
Billy Shears im very bored
Cranberry Paul
actually with the new deluxe edition of sgt pepper you can clearly hear John saying cranberry sauce twice. Next please
. Paul didn't die in 2017 he died in 1966 it could have been altered in anyway
Desmanta's comment hurts my head
Hey Mister >>> Richard Starkey is Left-Handed also. So, stop saying that "James Paul McCartney" is The Only "Left-Handed" Beatle! "Can You Hear Me?"
Carol E. Johnson ringo is left handed, but he writes with his right because his family thought there was something wrong with being left handed, as many others did at that time, and he also plays on a right handed kit.
What ever you believe, you have to admit all the album and song references are strange. I've always felt that the whole Paul is dead story was started by Lennon and was a reference to Paul's first acid trip. People often report that they feel like they've died when on acid. In any case, I firmly believe the rumor started with the Beatles.
Samuel Fugarino you may be right I Am the Walrus the last section you need a good pair of headphones you will hear smoke pot smoke pot and behind that bury my body I'm Paul I'm dead look I hear it 45years ago at the time I had not heard that Paul was dead please check it out (good headphones ) it's in the last 45-90sec the first Acid trip that makes sense that was at the time of Magical Mystery Tour I bet that's what it was about
It's Shakespeare
OSWALD
(falling) Slave, thou hast slain me. Villain, take my purse
If ever thou wilt thrive, bury my body.
And give the letters which thou find’st about me
To Edmund, Earl of Gloucester. Seek him out
Upon the British party. O untimely death! (dies)
EDGAR
I know thee well-a serviceable villain,
As duteous to the vices of thy mistress
As badness would desire.
GLOUCESTER
What, is he dead?
It's not "smoke pot, smoke pot, everybody smoke pot." It's "got one, got one, everybody's got one" combined with "oompah, ooompah, stick in your jumper." Each section of the choir they hired for the recording session is saying a different phrase at the same time.
you can make anything a "strange reference" if you draw enough lines. its the way the universe works. some people arent capable of understanding this, but tather than admit their own ignorance they probably suffer a bit of the dunning-kruger effect
@@DesignByKirk Or, you can just accept that The Beatles all were quite capable of pulling off an elaborate practical joke. Then you can stop condescendingly debunking all the very obvious clues.
Even in 1966 it was quite obvious that when any prominent musician died, record sales went through the roof.
So if you're a promoter, what better gimmick than to start a death rumor, and just letting it hang out there indefinitely?
Unlike the case with an actual death, this could (and did) stay unresolved in the public mind for years, rather than just weeks.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ !!
Wake up sleepyhead
Hah. Well, they were able to find quite an amazing replacement Paul, because he has had an amazing career!
It must feel pretty awful to basically have people deny your whole life and accomplishments, insisting you died when you were only 22 and someone else did everything else from thereon.
"Amazing career" is easy when MI5 set it up
Blessedone333AZ also earth is plain , man has never been to the moon , elvis presley is still alive , hitler lived in argentina till he died a few years ago , and you have brain , all this things are equally true.
@@lawyerlawyer1215 The amazing thing about these people who belive the theory is true, is that they comment and say this with such an conviction
Paul looked woo cool I am sad now
Paul has no idea.
"Paul's holding a cig in his right hand, left handed people don't do that"
Person who created the theory must be right handed then, as I can confirm, as a left hander, I'll hold my cigs in any hand I damn well please.
That’s right, I am right handed but I do other things with the left hand, like smoking a cig
Imo anyone who still believes that Paul is dead, is a fool.
Jeffrey Parent No, I'm not a fool and I'd know.
Jeffrey Parent it's only dumb if you're super young, or your folks never schooled you on HUGE The Beatles were at the time. Most people were high as hell and conjecture just fell that direction...
You're the fool...
True.
The big story wouldn't have been that Paul is dead. It would have been that a look alike was found that was just as talented as Paul.
even if he is dead, the guy is good
Paul is not dead
Alex Xavier mhm suuure
@@patrickisaboveme880 People change. Woohoo, look at me! I look different! Im not actually me, Im an imposter.
The stupidity of people is truly staggering sometimes.
Well if paul really died and they replaced him why didnt they replace the others when they died
Because Paul was murdered and the Beatles were no longer a @thing” when the others died.
Paul is Dead, actually. Anyone who laughs it off as a joke hasn’t done their research and has no idea of what they’re talking about.
youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.com/2013/12/paul-is-dead-new-j-lennon-clue-ignore.html?m=1
One way to prove this rumor is fake is if you look at Paul's fingers and the way they rest on the fretboard when he's playing there's no way anybody else can replicate that exactly his fingers rest on the fretboard exactly the way they did in the early days today
Not a conspiracy theorist but I saw in a recent interview that Paul was giving on tv where he excused himself to "say hello to a friend" and he greeted George Harrison's widow (her first name escapes me) and as she hugged him you can CLEARY see and hear her say "Hello, Billy!" What the heck is THAT all about? How is that explained?
It can easily be explained this way: she does not say “Billy”.
People on here joke about this! But if it was true. Had nothing to do with album sales. The main reason is,if Paul did die that day,would have been the end of the beetles. What better Motive to pull something like this. The band would have lost Millions. just saying!
She clearly did
@@handle-schmandleshe says it distinctly
@@juanbbien Only on the PID channels. In reality, whatever she really says ends in “s”.
I have always thought that the Beatles were in on it, either because they thought it was a clever goof, or to promote record sales, or both.
Even if Paul is dead ( which he isn't ) he still would have sung in Sgt. Peppers, Let it Be, Abbey Road, White album, Magical Mystery Tour, and everything else
How do you figure he sung "even if he's dead"? X b
Jon Snow, and don't forget about Wings!
therealnightwriter
People change. Look for David Duchovny on the 90s and then nowdays.... but some peple change faster
therealnightwriter you can’t really back up any of those claims. Very subjective and obscure.
I'm surprised the crash was fatal, given the air bag in the car's steering wheel.
Even if Paul was sometime replaced, it doesn't mean he's dead....
I would like to think this too, but all these damn conspiracy theorists say he's dead. Who knows what the truth is, but I do believe for sure he was replaced. These are two completely different people. You can look in interview comparison on here from 66 to 67 and see it's two completely different people.
Could be living in Pauls birth house as John Halliday?
"Paul was smoking with his right hand," I smoke with my left hand being a right handed person, i know it being fake and a joke
I'm right handed and smoke with my right hand
I'm right handed, But I hold my cigarettes in my left hand...
Scott Calhoun everybody's different and how they hold their cigarettes or anything else no matter whether you can use both hands or your left or right handed
Scott Calhoun I don't believe that he's fake either I think it's a joke that was started and way back and I don't believe it's true I believe that Paul is the real Paul but that's just my opinion
Donna Singh , I agree...
Myself and my mom were looking at more SHIT from RUclips and from social media from years ago,and I was looking at a post where John halliday was the topic and was talking about a mole and a scar,and the commentator speaking was saying that Paul had a mole on the exact same cheek and a scar on the lip...
This was after 66 when Paul supposedly died...
I was looking at another clip from 64 with Paul in it and I didn't see NO mole on his cheek, neither one OR a scar...
The way I see it is, no one knows the truth except for Paul and his family and God...
You failed to mention that in "Glass Onion" John sings:
"_And here's another clue for you all / The Walrus was Paul_"
And on the back cover of _Sgt Pepper_ George is pointing to the lyric "5 o'clock" which is when the accident happened (allegedly).
All I wanna know is why did he pay child support to a woman for 18 years for a kid that wasn't his? When the guy tried to sue for what he thought was his entitlement, right or wrong, turned out Paul's DNA was not a match at all, the woman accused him to send an imposter to the test, or so I have read, something is rotten in Denmark just not sure which side?
Greg, Paul slept with a lot of groupies. He always had to go to the doctor when he came home from tours to get "decrabbed" so he would not give them to Jane Asher. That is also why she eventually broke off with him. She got tired of him constantly cheating. He had no idea whom he had slept with whom he he hadn't, there had been so many. Brian Epstein would pay these girls off when they claimed one of the Beatles got them PG. It was easier to do that and less money in the long run than risk a big scandal costing them loss in sales/popularity. I imagine he could have a good many illegitimate 50 year old plus children running around all over the world. but if their mothers were groupies they usually slept with a lot of other men so they may not even know, as their mothers had no idea who fathered their baby. I am all the time reading stories of people finding their birth father through DNA tests and their matching a cousin/sibling/uncle/aunt of their father in ancestry.com or myhertiage's data base. The stories are very similar. Either the mother had had multiple partners or she was with some guy at party whom she did not really know. One guy found out his father was a Canadian rock star lol! through one of these companies. the funny part is his mother told him it was a possibility but he thought she was making it up
People for things not lining up ITS CALLED AGING
getting taller is aging.
I wrote a report on this in 6th grade
i think i have been replaced by a drone that goes back to a dead end job every day where it never gets promoted no matter how hard it tries
He's not dead; he just smells funny.
On the Abbey Road album cover, Paul says he's barefoot because it was a really hot day so he kicked his sandals off. Who takes their shoes off on a scorching hot day to walk across searing asphalt? Makes no sense. Something's not right, it doesn't square.
Honestly, I did that once...
They were staging a funeral procession.
Take your meds, grandpa
Be quiet you tool. It's in England, it's not like the floor turns to molten lava. Imagine thinking someone walking barefoot "makes no sense". What a fucking nutjob
It's a photo from many taken that day in a photo shoot . No conspiracy, no replacement, no death , just sad people with fuck all to do trying to look clever. Grow up you shit heads
I recall hearing a radio interview with a guy who was involved with the creation of the "Paul is Dead" rumor.
Paul is Dead, actually. Anyone who laughs it off as a joke hasn’t done their research and has no idea of what they’re talking about.
youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.com/2013/12/paul-is-dead-new-j-lennon-clue-ignore.html?m=1
In several areas of US and Australia a news flash in SEPT 1966 . Post 1966 , 3" TALLER , Eye Color Changed, Toes Different , Ears Changed, Different Singing Voice .
These people include Rubber Soul, Revolver, and sometimes even Help! in their "clues," they can't even get their own timeline right.
There’s a very credible explanation in the amazing book available from Amazon, ‘You gave me the answer’ by Ruth Indesit.
In the 1970s I recorded "Revolution #9" on really thin 1/4" tape ("half track") and "flipped" it on playback, Ironically it really doesn't sound THAT different than it does running forward.(John Lennon, George Martin "trolling" the suckers, I guess). Today we can just load audio into something like "Audacity" and see if we 'hear' anything when "reversed" Or We can make our own "backwards masking Pavlovian remote control" records! 🍻
I thought it was an Aston Martin. I've not seen Philip Howarth for years.
Funny though, how rapidity the changes were, forensically, (pix & videos), the soft tissue changes.
Ffs johns the walrus, Paul's the hippo
Yes and i am the eggplant .
I never heard this story till a few years ago when I saw a mocumentary called “Paul McCartney really is dead: The last testament of George Harrison”. I found it hilarious
Hahaha even this so called George H. had a different speaking voice to the real George's. It was just a set-up make-believe kind of thing.
You forgot the forensic data done by the Italian.
Oh man, it's so strange to see Simon without a beard and glasses! :D
This rumour has always intrigued me, even if I don't believe it. The mythos of it is creepy. :D
The real Paul is in hiding with Lord Lucan 😁
You failed to mention that Paul really was in an motor accident in '66 where he chipped a tooth and damaged his upper lip. This why he grew the mustache seen on the Pepper album, to cover up the scar.
Not quite. You have the history a bit wrong. Paul had his moped accident in Dec. ‘65 where he chipped his tooth. He died November ‘66 in which all 4 Beatles were sporting mustaches. This was not to cover a damaged lip, but to throw off all the fans from noticing the changed Pauls.
@@michaelkennedy6415 Total BS!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am a right handed writer. My mom forced me. Everything else (almost ) I am left-handed. A lot of kids in that era were forced right handed.
Refreshing thank you. It's amazing how these things snowball.
Paul is Dead, actually. Anyone who laughs it off as a joke hasn’t done their research and has no idea of what they’re talking about.
youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.com/2013/12/paul-is-dead-new-j-lennon-clue-ignore.html?m=1
Hardly a comprehensive look at the theory. I have left a response video link, but it will probably be deleted, so go to my channel if you ACTUALLY want to learn about Paul is Dead Theory.
I find it extremely sad that they haven't found a John and George replacement yet. Really......
Imagin you're so famous, that when you wear no shoes, people think you're dead
Paul was NOT the only lefty in the beatles.
My take on this, after delving into it in recent weeks, is just a publicity stunt. It involved the Beatles themselves, deliberately leaving clues in songs and in album artwork. With Paul being the one most admired by female fans, it made the most sense to have him the subject of the rumor. It gave the band publicity, kept people talking about the band, and very well may have resulted in increased record sales.
I am, however, open to any new arguments, or developments, that might be presented to me. I've been wrong before, and it's only through having an open mind about these sorts of things that I've been able to check myself and correct my thinking.
Nah, I don't think it was a publicity stunt. The Beatles were going through too much crap to have pulled something like that at the time. This rumor started in late 1969. The Beatles had pretty much broken up by then. Unless Allen Klein had a hand in it....hmmmm. And it's well known that Paul hated Allen. I didn't actually think about that until just now.
Paul is Dead, actually. Anyone who laughs it off as a joke hasn’t done their research and has no idea of what they’re talking about.
youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.com/2013/12/paul-is-dead-new-j-lennon-clue-ignore.html?m=1
@@michaelmakinney20 you are an idiot if you really believe Paul is dead. It’s a total publicity stunt and all those clues on Abby Road etc were for that reason. You must believe everything you read. That link you put down is garbage.
@Michael Makinney you are utterly absurd . No brain cells . Hope You find truth or sense either one
You can definitely see that Paul is much different looking then Billy.
They didn't mention the "I buried Paul" part at the end of Strawberry Fields Forever.
Lennon says "cranberry sauce",
which describes Paul's body
after his car got ran over by that runaway steamroller...
blood on the piano, pans to Paul each time John sings "nothing is real" plastic pieces on Paul's ears....
john often contradicted himself, apparently one time he said it was "i buried Paul" and was meant to mean he played better than Paul on the track..... John was pretty slippery with these facts
If any image showing a hand over Paul's head is considered a "clue", then surely the first to surface is in an ad in TV Guide on November 24, 1966 (Thanksgiving) for ABC's (US) cartoon line-up, showcasing ABC's various cartoon characters, including a "group shot" of the cartoon-show Beatles where John "prankishly" has a hand raised behind Paul's head in "peace sign" style (PALM FORWARD!). ABC ran these ads for several successive years on Thanksgiving, always using the same John's-hand-over-Paul's-head depiction of the cartoon Beatles. Yltsenoh, sega rof daed neeb sah Gits!
I think Paul is still alive the only question I have to ask is why replace him and not just say he died if he was to die like there are many other famous celebrities like Paul McCartney who I'm sure have died at a young age so why not just say Paul McCartney died that's the one thing I really really really really don't get?🤔
look at the car after the accident
even if he is dead. he still makes great music
Paul is my favorite, or at least who ever the replacement is. It's more about how a dead person could be replaced and all this to have happened
When’s the last time Paul made “great music”?
I guess back with wings
@@timetowakeup630269s
ringo is a lefty too lol
Rumours were spreading of Paul's death as early as late '66. It was popularised in 1969, not started.
Russell Gray Wrong. Not rumors in 1966. Paul's death was announced on every news outlet, tv and radio.
As a Beatles fan, I found this highly entertaining! What boggles my brain are the number of people who still think Sir Paul McCartney is an imposter. I'm sure the Queen would have checked before she knighted him! Great video, Top Tenz! Don't forget to check out Simon's vlog. It's a lot of fun and sometimes there are "behind the scenes" videos of how all these fascinating programs are made.
+Corky Schillinger Oh yeah The Queen totally wants to tell the commonfolk all the secrets!
David Weed No, of course not. But, I'm sure she would have had someone verify his actual identity before the honor was offered, even if it is a largely ceremonial post.
+David Weed right!
+Corky Schillinger The illuminati runs the world so you really don't think the queen is apart of it!?
+Jaden Rowe - With all due respect to you and Mr. Weed, I cannot take you guys seriously at all. I lived through those times. Paul is alive and well and still making music. If you want to believe otherwise, you are free to do so. I know nothing concrete about the Illuminati but rumors and conjecture, the same type of which tries to keep propagating this myth that Paul is dead. For me, this is the end of this discussion. Good bye.
Regardless if he is not the Original Paul he Viv, William, etc. He put out a lot of good music with the Beatles, Wings, and Solo. Love Him.
The Tavistock institute wrote most of their songs.
Perhaps we should ask Paul he will know
Billy Shears is the pseudonym Ringo adopted for his performance of "With A Little Help From My Friends" that track, and the one preceding, the Sgt. Pepper title cut, were linked together, one blending into the next, Ringo starts his song just after the sung intro of the character name. This linked pairing of the two songs was carried over to the 1973 2-LP compilation, "Beatles 1967-1970" where it opened Record 2/Side 1, then carried further to the CD reissue of the compilation Beatles 1967-1970 where it opened Disc 2. As for McCartney being dead, that'd make him a fairly active ghost. Of course his death was never anything more than a publicity stunt, but perpetuated by other than The Beatles, come to think of it.
As a musician who appreciates Paul's singing, songwriting, and sense of humor, let me just say that the profusion of Beatles tribute bands-which are invariably rather disappointing, no matter how good and authentic the song renditions are when performed (and they're not always very good/authentic)-goes to show how hard it is to find someone who (1) looks the part; (2) sounds the part; (3) consistently carries on the part for decades. It MIGHT be possible to find someone who looked 'sort of like' Paul, but to find-in that same individual-someone who also could vocally SOUND and SING like Paul (and his-what?-3+ octave range)-would be well nigh impossible, unless perhaps Paul had an identical twin. (Even if human cloning existed in the 1960s, consider how rapidly someone would have had to come up with a twenty-something Paul clone/substitute in a mere matter of weeks/months, never mind time for clone to have sufficient singing/bass-playing lessons. 'Rapid cloning' may exist as a fictional plot device in STAR WARS Episode II, but it has yet to be demonstrated in real life.) Add to that impossible looks-alike/sings-alike combination the condition of "writes songs alike" and the high improbability goes just impossibly off-the-scale. A McCartney clone could not accumulate enough similar life experience to just 'step in' for Paul and be convincingly similar as a writer, and even a dedicated composer/songwriter-and I'm one of those myself-would have to work excruciatingly hard to ghost-write consistently believable McCartney-esque melodies, harmonic progressions, lyrics, bass-lines, and arrangements for even ONE song, much less for many albums thereof. The only way around the 'authentic McCartney' style problem with respect to Paul's songs would be to assert that all of Paul's songs were ghost-written by an anonymous third party from the beginning of the Beatles as teenagers in Liverpool and who does anyone suppose would have shelled out the money for that kind of many years-long charade for the sake of some unknown wannabe kid?
Yesh tell those dense ninnies ! agreed
Don't forget the infamous Abbey Rd VW Beetle with its numberplate PMC 281F, which many took to be a message that Paul McCartney would be 28 if he was alive - 'though seeing as the album was released in September of 1969, this seems a bit strange. A case of hallucinogens trying to hammer large round pegs into small square holes, perhaps.
If you can just pull Paul look-a-likes out of a hat like this I want four of them. Thanks.
P. S. Please deliver to my door step.
There was already been two forensics tests done and these can be read just google. The first was done by a professor at University of Miami who is a specialist in audio using electronic signatures. He took a song from pre 66 and one post 67 and proved that electronically they do not even remotely match. Proof number 1.
Wired magazine hired a forensic firm who works for law enforcement to put the "hoax" to bed once of for all. When they got back the results they were shocked. Audio signatures shows not 2 but 3 different signatures as they said in early 67 some one was else was also used. They also did physical forensics and found that the facial bone structure do not match, the distance from the top of the nose to the end does not match, the distance from the top of the head to the bottom of the chin do not match, the teeth do not match, the jaws do not match, how the upper jaw ends up causing teeth to be pushed together, (when not large enough), does not match. The distance between the eyes do not match, ears and earlobes do not match, physical bone structure does not match, weights do not match, heights do not match, hair parts do not match, eye color does not match and shoe sizes also do not match. They said they also discovered that going over photos over the Beatles years that most were doctored and they used parts of Paul face to morph into the new guy so -people would forget how Paul actually looked. They stand by their work and said this would hold up in any court of law. Proof number 2.
The Beatles up to 67 used one photographer and he was Italian. In an interview still on youtube he claims. that in early 67 he came home and found that his home had been broken into and it was clear someone was looking for the negatives and images he had taken pre 67 and they left all other images and everything was scattered about. He said two days later he gets a call from someone who said they represented Paul McCartney and they wanted to buy all his negatives and images. He refused and they are still all in safe keeping. He said that what they were trying to do was scrub all images and negatives from pre 66. He said that at he time he thought it was so strange that Paul just did not call him and ask as they were very good friends and he would have just given what he wanted. This is when he said that he knew something was amiss. Proof number 3.
Now Tavistock, (change thru social engineering), wanted to use the Beatles to promote their agenda and move away from basically a boy band to something entirely different. Now evidently McCartney did not want to go along with the new agenda of promoting drugs, free sex and completely changing their music, facial looks and clothing styles. After 67 the Beatles changed completely not only music but promoting drug use and eastern mysticism. Again a great example of change thru social engineering.
John in his solo work was becoming more and more vocal about the new guy and was actually telling the world. "On How do you sleep at night?" he came right out and said "Those freaks were right when they said you were dead". He was not holding back. What pushed the UK government over the edge? In a video he and George were sitting at a table and he says right out to George, "Where is Billy? Then George makes the comment about the fab 4 and John responds, "You mean fab 3'.
Recently in an interview in one of the London newspapers Ringo made the startling claim that he was the only remaining Beatle left. Strange for him to make this comment if not true. In his song "back off boogaloo", this is a straight jab at the new Paul and this is what the remaining 3 Beatles called him.
Now the new guy is from Scotland. Where did he and Linda go when Time magazine tracked then down? Scotland. Where did they go and live permanently? Scotland. In the RAM album what does it say when looked in reverse? BILL. What does RAM really stand for? Radical Alteration Modification. Don't you think it odd that a lad from Liverpool would end up in Scotland owning a sheep farm?
Right after the forensic report went public by Wired magazine, where did McCartney go? On the David Letterman show. What did they talk about? The death "hoax". He give the ridiculous statement about Abbey Road cover that he has flip flops on and it was so hot that he kicked them off and walked across the pavement. Really? Hot pavement? Folks this is in your face. Now there are you tube vids out there where people have slowed this conversation down and there are subconscious clues that he unintentionally gives away like his facial expressions, his movement of his fingers, hands and arms and of course his body language.
This is Tavistock doing damage control.
jimsjoe1 great post sir
WRONG
DNA PROVES IT'S NOT PAUL BUT WILLIAM CAMPBELL.
JUST WAIT...
WHITE HATS KNOW THE TRUTH
So let me get this straight, a magazine that has to sell plenty of magazines ( obviously because this was before the internet took off ) hires a so-called forensic expert to determine the truth, oh please, they wanted to tell a good story and make money from it. Anyone could be calling and asking for Paul's negatives, he was so freaking famous of course people were after them, and anyone would make up stories to claim to represent Paul to get their hands on them, proves nothing.
A very interesting post. Uncovering more information and raising more questions. Thank you for posting.
"All I want is the truth; just give me the truth .. "
Some people can see the truth, one day it will come out ..
Wow. I’m impressed with your information. You’re an excellent writer. The only thing that I’d change is about the Tavistock institute. Tavistock had more to do with early Beatles work. But it is true that they wanted to usher in the hippie movement. Tavistock wanted to confuse/dumb down kids like they’re successfully doing today. Paul was OK with a little pushing of drugs. I.E. “Good Day Sunshine” was about marijuana that he first tried in ‘65. William Campbell, who was 3 years younger than Paul, did LSD back in 65. Paul died being the only Beatle who had not tried acid. When Paul died, the Beatles made a deal with Tavistock (Theodor Adorno) that if they went on, the creative leash would be loosened for the band to have more of a creative input of their own.
Missed opportunity to put “new videos 8 days a week” at the end instead of 7
I'm surprised the "You were in a car crash, and you lost your hair," lyric wasn't mentioned from "Don't Pass Me By" in this
"Paul is dead now. Miss Him, Miss Him, Miss Him."
Revolution 9 - Backwards.
Remind me to never take the pill you took before writing that.
Laceykat66 ,have you ever played this backward?:
" spare a dime and blow
your mind, muuuusic".
when you play that backwards it says : when the rain comes.
It's in the song 'rain'
during the outro.
Actually your quote applies to the bit of mumbling after “I’m so tired”. Revolution 9 played backward is “turn me on dead man”.
@@handle-schmandle Turn me on dead man - The Paul McCartney Death Hoax. That is where I first heard about it.
@Laceykat66 I will check it out. I’ve been aware of the PID thing forever and have actually spun the record backward myself. All I was saying was you were quoting the wrong song. But it is definitely there. 😊
The Beatles trolling the whole world 😂
Response video: ruclips.net/video/od-ZJG1LE8k/видео.html
Forget the Paul video. I'm more interested in you without a beard!
What!!!! Never seen you like this😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
What you didn't mention about the Sgt. Pepper cover is that you can place a mirror horizontally over the word HEARTS so that it reads: "HE^DIE" wilth the arrow "^" pointing at Paul.
The license plate of the car that is visible on the Abbey Road cover reads "28 IF", indicating that Paul would have been 28 years old, "if..."
The Beatles line up on Abbey Road from right to left has been said to represent a funeral: John, the priest, in white, Ringo, the pallbearer, in black, Paul, the corpse, barefooted, and George, the spectator, in plain clothes.
Comas Musica so true. Do u know the newer cd's and vinyl they have changed it to HE BIE.
Paul was born in June 1942. Abby Road was released in September 1969 when he was 27. John was 28, but not Paul.
...or maybe John the priest, Ringo the undertaker Paul the corpse and George the grave digger?...although that is not absolute proof of anything.
If you can't see the physical aspects of different colored eyes, shape of head, height, teeth, ears. You can watch pre 1966 video's of Paul playing the Bass flawlessly, not looking at his hand placement, finger plucking and then compare them to post 67 where he awkwardly looks at his finger placement and uses a pick.
the Movie HELP (1965) was done in color and has many closeups of Paul. Paul's hazel eyes sometimes look brown and sometimes look green.
You've got your dates all wrong. It was Sept 11/1966 that is when for 3 days he had disappeared and said was dead from car accident then after 3 days he was suddenly alive again.
What a way to sell albums! lol By the way I love Beatles stuff! You could also do one on John Lennon and the #9 lots of strange little coincidences! lol
The lookalikes daughter is called Beatrice and she looks like the original Paul. How can that be?🙄🙄
please talk about the picture of three pauls at one boat in new york... thnx :)
it would be nice to have Paula replaced every 80 years, but we could enjoy his music endlessly
because the music of the Beatles and Poul is music all-timeall-time, forever live music
I saw the F. Lee Bailey TV broadcast mentioned here. Unfortunately no video footage was saved.
The double that replaced Paul McCartney has died and has been replaced by a triple. Is there no end to this conspiracy?
No, and we must not let the public know.
The real rumor here is that Simon Whitely (the narrator in this "throw up" of review on Paul McCartney's death)) died sometime during this video and was replaced by Andre Agassi (look closely...a good lookalike) When SImon shifts to the right his bald head is just one inch from the top of the screen, then, when he is on the left his bald pate is 2 inches below the top...can't be the same guy!! Also, he seems to be "dancing more" when filmed on the right making me think Steffi Graf is somewhere below "Andre" giving him a continuous "backhand" somewhere below his belt! Goo goo ga joob!
Somehow I doubt that, back in 1969, Fred LaBour was joking to the degree he wants us to believe... 🤷♂
The main reason why people thought that Paul had died was because he had been in a serious motorcycle accident, so it actually does make _some_ sense for the "Paul Is Dead" rumours to start after that point.
And I am saying this as someone who doesn't believe in that conspiracy theory at all.
"Cranberry sauce!"
WRONG, the rumours started in 1966 when the Beatles recorded the promo videos for Rain and Paperback Writer, Paul had fallen off a moped chipping his tooth and swelling his lip just before shooting began, upon viewing the promo a few people saw the tooth/swelling and started claiming it wasn't Paul, since then the rumour mill gathered momentum and idiots started cashing in/linking anything they could - even fabricating details to fit the narrative (the armband says OPP not OPD etc.), even using pics of Paul disguised to go about un-noticed as supposed original pics of his replacement, Paul grew a moustache to cover the scar on his upper lip so of course this was more 'proof' of him hiding his true identity, watch the PBW and Rain promo vids to see for yourself (this why 1966 is the supposed year)
EVERY 'cast-iron' claim is easily refuted/debunked, EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE their heavy schedule would never have allowed for the kind of healing period necessary for such heavy plastic surgery, during that period they were photographed/interviewed/followed/documented almost 24 hours a day - never mind the unlikelyhood of finding as talented, prolific and distinctive a doppelganger who could instantly mimic every nuanced mannerism of McCartney, it truly baffles me how people still keep clinging to this notion, I've read umpteen books on the Beatles and am always irritated by my own need to waste my time setting this story straight but these pathetic videos keep appearing in my suggestions
if he is dead and the beatles replace him with someone else then why they leave so many clues behind and when somebody ask them about the conspiracy they denied it
i am absolutely convinced that Paul McCartney did die in 1966 and was 'replaced' ..would be shocked if it were ever actually proven not to be true.
You are the only one that needs to get a life. If you believe this crap, then my god, you are a low life loser.
so is the real Paul macartney buried in some unmarked grave somewhere in Liverpool. ?
Not unmarked, they changed the name on the headstone so no one would know. They even carried on the ruse throughout the funeral, making everyone think they were having it for someone else when it was really Paul. It was such an elaborate scheme, no one who actually knew Paul attended the funeral. They hired actors to play the mourners and wrote a fake obituary in the newspaper. Moreover, Paul's face underwent postmortem plastic surgery so that his corpse would not be recognized if it were ever exhumed.
It's a fact every school child knows.
Oh come on ...
+Bigwave2003 The fact that all conspiracy theorists are severely retarded?
Rumour has it he was murdered by intel in late August 1966 in the US near Seattle and buried at sea. The reason for this was he had too much influence on youth in US/UK over his anti-Vietnamese war stance. Secondly, he was composing a score for a film on the assassination of JFK being a deep state operation and nothing to do with Lee Harvey Oswald. After that they never toured again and became a studio band and Lennon went off the rails. William Campbell was a temporary stand in but nobody really noticed. The four Beatles then grew moustaches and grew much longer hair. People in the 21st century have completely forgotten who the real James Paul McCartney actually was. Most comments on this thread make little sense and show no understanding how intel psy-ops work in US/UK. Many writing here are millennials who know very little about the Beatles and are probably American. The Beatles were off course an English pop group NOT American.
Youve got the wrong car... and the wrong month...
And wrong year
No he didn't. The January 1967 article about Paul's death is the actual moment the rumour started. The rumour underwent a number of revisions subsequently.
No he didn't. All kinds of rumors of when the car accident happened and they have all kinds of dates of when it supposedly happened
Well, I don’t know if you believe me- but this is what I know. Before Paul died on November 9th 1966, there were a couple of vague rumors in the press about a possible car crash the year before. Much of that rumor started because Paul had a horrible moped accident Christmas’65. He busted his lip and broke his front tooth. After Paul died, many people who knew of it started to talk about the crash. But it wasn’t in an automobile. The handler wanted to confuse the public, so they had the Beatles publish publicly that he died on the M1 in a (I forgot if it was an Aston Martin) in January 1967.
i'm a big fan of faul YOU KNOW, he is a good composer at all: live and let die, let it be, band on the run, blackbird even hey jude great songs at all dude
Damn!
I wasted so much money of those Beatles Monthly Books 🙄
Well, conspiracies are stupid
Conspiracy theories can be a lot of fun, like this one, as long as you don't take them too seriously! And even conspiracies can be stupid, although not always.
+Fox Chaos When your parents conspired to make someone who doesn't understand English... it was stupid.
Fox Chaos Yet you clearly don’t know the difference between conspiracies and a conspiracy theory. Now, tell me again how stupid conspiracies are and I’ll let you know just exactly how stupid you are!
Not all conspiracy theories are stupid, most are, but many theories have been proven to be correct.
Some are true , some other not .
Paul McCartney did get replaced whether he died or not no one knows but the guy in 1969 is definitely not the same guy from 1965. His face is longer and hes about 3inches taller. These are physical proofs that it's not the same guy. Not mention Paul's death would certainly explain why the Beatles just all of a sudden stop touring at the height of their career in 1966
I enjoy your videos. I only wish the graphics more closely showed what is being discussed. Zoom in on the cover. Show the insert. You have it in your hand and we don't.