Andrew Barratt Lol. I don’t know exactly what you mean by that but the reason I mentioned Burdon was because of this quote from the book “The Beatles A Hard Day’s Write” by Steve Turner: “The ‘eggman’ was supposedly a reference to Animals’ vocalist Eric Burdon who had an unusual practice of breaking eggs over his female conquests while making love and became known among his musical colleagues as ‘the eggman’.“
So they found someone who looked just like Paul, sounded like Paul, played lefthanded bass, wrote songs just like him. And just in time for the next album.
And nobody in the Beatles circles seemed particularly grieving in that time period. Somebody surely would have been terribly upset about this. Not like hundreds of people would be immediately suspicious of a replacement. Can you imagine if someone you knew well was replaced by someone who looked a lot like them? You'd still know, and pretty fast.
Ya,,,,,,,and they never played live again after the New Paul made his debut.....LOL.....oh ya, and the New Paul went on to play with his former band mates before he was paul.>>….LOL>...
The strange thing about this song is that 60 years later You still can't buy it, Amazon will not sell it. Whoever bought the copyrights to the song does not want someoneelse making money off of it.
If they could replace Paul McCartney with a another human that looked like him, talked like him, played left-handed bass like him, acted like him and sang like him...all within a matter of months - then hell! Why not do the same thing again and replace all four Beatles with the same qualifications? If it's that easy- get on it! Oh, and George Martin too, just for good measure.
But you hit all the critical points. He doesn't look like him. He's taller, different chin, different eye color, different ears (the Wired article). It's just that we had the original Paul for only 5 years of their '63 -67 period. We've had the new Paul for 50+ years, so he has become the definitive Paul. The original Paul had a much deeper speaking voice and a very wry wit. Watch the pre 67 press conferences.
Post 66 Paul did not look like Paul, many women at that time didn't even recognize him, if you watch earlier videos, Paul rarely looked at his fretboard, he had a different bass style too which paralleled Jack Bruce and John Entwisle, after 66 the bass was recorded afterward the songs were recorded. He is much taller.
Well, John Lennon wrote I Am The Walrus because a fan sent him a letter saying that they were analysing beatles' lyrics at school, so he decided to write what is probably one of the weirdest songs ever
@@junkhead_92 In an interview, he stated that he was referring to the Walrus and the Carpenter in Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland." He had mistakenly thought the Walrus was the good guy in the poem and when he realized that the Walrus was a bad guy he then stated in Glass Onion that the walrus was Paul. It has nothing to do with Paul being dead.
To find someone who looks like him, sounds like him, has his ability to write songs and perform them and then get everyone else including his bandmates and family to get in on the act is mental.
@@Shepards-tone “ He never wrote anything post-Revolver that was as good” ….well, that, right there, is ludicrous. And that isn’t just MY opinion. And Blackbird, Hey Jude, Abbey Road second side medley, Day in the Life aren’t as good…. !? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have a theory that will blow your minds. John was shot in 1980, George died in 2001, and Paul and Ringo are both still alive. Oh, and Ringo has magic sunglasses that stop ageing.
Pauls writing style changed dramatically. The Beatles were the biggest export Britain had. Nothing would surprise me. The music business is full of people getting knocked off. No one wants to believe it.
@@WhoCares-dl8zr He actually died in the womb, and was replaced by Sir James Paul McCartney by Doctor Robert. Or maybe it was James Sir Bensen Mum, who knows.
John and George's writing styles changed drastically too. It's called having originality along with extreme talent. The Beatles were pioneers of rock and roll. Both in their songwriting, and in the studio. After they became the biggest band in the world they had the opportunity to experiment in the studio, and the luxury of brilliant engineers to make their ideas possible. They took recording to the next level, and did things nobody had ever done before.
@Dean Morrow Or was he killed 35 years after the fact to silence him? It's just like JFK...one after the other every witness keeps dying off of "old age". ;-)
In case no one has mentioned it yet, the rumor actually started in early 1967 when The Beatles fan magazine responded to rumors that Paul had died in a car crash.
Exactly. The whole Paul is dead thing was cooked up by Paul, his occult pals and EMI records. Sgt. Pepper's is full of clues. He's still playing the game folks.
@@duderama6750 Yep. Here is another clue for you all: The Anthology 3 cover. The pictures of John, George, and Ringo are all from the cover of Let It Be. The picture of Paul for Let It Be is torn away to reveal a picture of Paul from the Rubber Soul album. The original Paul. That is NOT an accident. That was done on purpose. This was a multi-million-dollar product they were releasing. Nothing was left to chance; it was all thought out ahead of time. They were STILL promoting the “Paul Is Dead” idea in the 1990’s. Right in our face for all of us to see. And like 67 says, I am guessing he is STILL playing it today.
@@spiritualarchitect4276 And a 79 year old keeping it going. Go look at the McCartney III cover. My point earlier though is that the PID always cite Black Magic or Devil worship or whatever. I just think Sir Paul has a very twisted sense of humor.
A lot of people felt betrayed when the Beatles got into a more experimental sound. Earlier fans of the band felt alienated from the changes made to the band. That’s what St. Paul is about.
LOSING THE TEENYBOPPERS CUZ OF ALL BEATLES BEING MARRIED, WEARING BEARDS AND GROWING UP, THE BEATLES WANTED TO AVOID BEING TYPECAST AS LIGHTWEIGHTS. SO YOKO CONVINCED JOHN TO GO FOR IT! LINDA CONCINVED PAUL TO LET HIS INNER BOOGIE OUT UNTIL KLEIN WAS GONE AND THEN IN '73 TO MAKE SOME CASH - WITHOUT THAT SNEAKY BUGGER. BILL WYMAN HAD TO BRING GOONS TO GET CASH OUT OF KLEIN, INSTEAD OF KLEIN BEING PROPERLY COMPLIANT.
They did do a Paul McCartney look alike contest back then and no results were ever given, and in a speech made by George after John's death, George said "we all loved John, and we all loved Paul.
Seems the Beatles were not just ahead of their time in making rock pop music, but also in realizing how much money can be made from conspiracies, imagine if they had social media back then. Wow.
BOOM. It blows my mind why people don’t see the middle ground. It fits their MO perfectly. Why isn’t it most likely it was a joke marketing stunt instead of some conspiracy theory is so strange to me. The reason why a lot of smart people consider it is because a ton of the almost obvious art work references. At what point is it obvious that the message they are wanting to send is about Paul. Here is the kicker. The only rational reason they would hint at something like that is because???? Certainly wouldn’t make sense to hint at it if they wanted it a big secret.
Please dear lord soundshaper, tell me how in the world did the Beatles bank on the PID theory? - unless you’re talking about those who listened to records backwards. They ruined the records 4X faster and had to buy new ones. Give me ONE other example!!!
@@goodcarma9659 Now they are gonna try to SCARE us with this UFO BS Dont fall for it Covid was there first attempt to control us AI is also in thier plans to depopulate human race
Seriously, you can do this conspiracy with anybody. There are more clues that John had died in the sixties than Paul. Who's all in white on the Abbey Road cover. John was 28 at the time of the cover shoot. Paul was 27. "Come Together...right now...over me." The song Good Morning Good Morning: "Nothing to do save his life...call his wife in." John was married at the time, not Paul. I'm Only Sleeping. He said "I Am the Walrus"...and "I know what it's like to be dead." His "baby's in black". On the cover of Rubber Soul, he's the only one staring into camera. I'm sure there are many more but these are off the top of my head. Can do it for the others too.
His appearance changed every four days - until the band broke up. Happiness is a Warm Gun. "One and one and one is three... come together over me". Opening lines of Come Together? 'Shoot me...shoot me...." releases Double Fantasy (maybe he was the double and his time with the band was a fantasy)... gets shot.
@@MrmelodyUs He was 27 when they took the cover photo of Abbey Road. One of the "Paul is dead" clues is the license plate of the Volkswagen on the same cover says "28IF". As in "28 if he had lived."
The Paul is Dead rumor started in '67, dude. The rumour began circulating around 1967. My mom, who lived in Kentucky, would talk about it with her friends in '67 when she was still High School. It went *wider* over the next two years, but it was already a thing in '67.
Because millions of Women were in Love with Paul. If they say it's not Paul, then it's Not. These Women were madly in love and knew every feature of him. Women's heart don't lie when they are truly in love. They Like what they Like.
@@InteleVision-Vic That's why women know it IS him. Micro-expressions don't lie. Adam never said his mother and her friends believed it, only that it was already a thing in 1967 that they were a buzz about.
My guess is that he met The Beatles who he'd idolized, but he met them at the time they were in the throws of breaking up, so they weren't at the best from a personality perspective. I'd say Paul was his hero, he met him and it turned out he wasn't all he'd built him up to be. That seems far more likely. The MacLen thing would purely be because he referenced so many Beatles songs and because he was on Capital.
Exactly my thinking, their meeting at Apple didn't go well, Knight flew home feeling pissed off and wrote this effort. McCartney would definitely have been aware of this record though, having met Knight recently and also having a financial interest in Maclen Music. Remember the music world was much smaller in those days.
I don't understand why the song wasn't a hit. If I was Paul and heard the song I'd have immediately called him up and made peace to get the thing properly released, you'd have to be a real dick to block it and he clearly didn't. You've got to remember, musicians back then were actually pretty bitchy about other musicians even if they were great friends. Dylan was really dismissive of Tomorrow Never Knows apparently, they were all at it, which I think was healthy. Saint Paul has novelty one hit wonder written all over it, and Paul by virtue of being in a pop band who hung out with intellectual types would have had a fairly thick skin to swipes I imagine.
yeah, the lyrics to me don't read like he's memorializing Paul, it reads like he's annoyed at how negotiations happened and he's mocking their most popular songs as well as taking a dig at mccartney.
It is pretty obvious that Paul died. Even though Tavistock institute or others from the club, made such a huge cover-up by doctoring photos and videos from '61' to '66'
It’s a fascinating story a lot of evidence is interesting. Watching Heather Mills say she had a box of evidence and something like if the public knew the truth they would be horrified in interviews was pretty shocking. It wouldn’t surprise me at all what goes on in the music industry I’ve had a few friends who have experiences of what goes on there as musicians and nothing would surprise me.
John Halliday is the original Paul McCartney, who didn't actually die, but was replaced. Halliday was appointed caretaker of the McCartney home, and there's video of him alive and well for you to see. It's a strange story indeed. There's so much evidence if you know how to find it. Both McCartney and Lennon were replaced. MI6 & Tavistock were controlling the BRANDed PSYOP commodity, Paul wanted out. And Lennon's replacement is the one who was shot not the original. Cheers. Go find the John Halliday video's.
I’m fairly sure she’s referring to evidence that he abused her and that he’s an abuser. I wouldn’t like to believe that about Paul, but that’s the most logical conclusion.
Interesting... Fun Fact: not only is William Campbell capable of duplicating all of Paul McCartney’s musical sensibilities and style to the Tee... but according to his 23andMe results, he was able to duplicate Paul McCartney’s genetic ties to his younger brother Michael. This conspiracy runs deep. At any rate, William Campbell rocks.
The best impressionist in history was also the best melodist of the 20th century and had the best recall ever for other people’s life stories. Truly talented.
If you spend enough time looking at the photographs you can 100% tell they are two separate people. Not only is his face longer after 1966, but his eyes are what really give it away. And the eyelashes.
The Beatles manufactured the ‘Paul is Dead’ theory. They were smart enough to know we’d still be sitting here all these years later looking for the answer. It was free press at the time, and something to keep their name relevant and interesting. It was ingenious, and has cemented their position in music history. There is nothing more to it than this.
Agreed. What the heck else do you make of Lennon singing on the White Album - "Here's another clue for you all/The Walrus was Paul." If he wasn't talking about this big ruse what the heck else was he talking about?
@@malcomtent6374 It had nothing to do with Paul being dead. He was referring to "The Walrus and the Carpenter" in Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland." He had mistakenly thought the walrus in the poem was a good guy when he wrote "I am the Walrus." When he reread the poem and realized the walrus was a bad guy, he then told everyone in "Glass Onion" that the walrus was Paul.
@@Kirke182 What about the "Here's another clue for you all" part of the lyric. What "clue" was John talking about? How many other clues did John leave indicating that the walrus was Paul? If this is "another clue" then he must have left others... clues that the Walrus was Paul. What were they? When and where did he start leaving them? I don't know... I'm not really buying your explanation.
All you have to do is compare photos and I believe it shows there were two Pauls. The original one had a slightly rounder face. The new one has a longer chin and larger mouth. The end of Paul's mouth lined up with the inner corner of his eye. Paul2's mouth lines up with the iris of his eye. And Paul had brown eyes whereas Paul2 has hazel eyes. He also developed quite a few wrinkles from 1966 to 1969. Still, the resemblance is remarkable. Evidently it's not that hard to find doubles for people as we are seeing now with corrupt politicians and celebrities being swapped out for doubles in the public eye while they're facing justice behind the scenes.
Look at the USA release of Introducing the Beatles. Paul has hazel green eyes there. Yet in subsequent color photos up close (teen magazines of which I have two originals) you see Pauls eyes are very brown, no green, no hazel no bluish color like today. There may have been 2 Paul's all along, we just didnt know it.
@@barbj9785 The original definitely was replaced after being killed in a car accident or something. This type of thing has been going on forever but I've only recently discovered it. It's crazy.
beatlesrockbandchris That is a great one. However, I feel like 3:47 has more variety. I feel it’s a better intro to the band for him. You also can’t go wrong with Calling Occupants.
You don't need to listen to this to realise that James Paul McCartney died in 1966. In 1967, Paul grew three inches, his eyes went from chocolate brown to green, grew another toe on his right foot. His arrest in Japan 1980 and held for 9 days was due to the fact that his fingerprints didn't match his arrest in 1960 Germany. Two Italian anthropologists confirmed that his cranium measures are different and got larger. A voice analysis done in 1969 showed two voices for Paul from 1966 to 1967. Some people refuse to accept the change and can't see the difference but its so obvious if you look closely. Listen to the songs. He don't sound the same from 1967 onwards. There are many clues there.
@@Intrusive_Thought176He can't. There isn't a single shred of evidence concerning the fingerprints. It's also nonsense about the height difference. And McCartneys' eyes are Hazel which can appear either green or brown depending on lighting.
They were never the same after meeting with that Surrey Mystic, Arthur Sultan, following the death of their manager, Leggy Mountbatten, the guy who lost his leg in the closing overs of World War 2. And once they started 'taking tea,' and admitting to 'taking tea,' that was it.
One salient point, males stop growing at around 17, some maybe 19, but that's rare. Paul didn't have a growth spurt in '66 at the age of 24, he died! The taller, lankier Billy Shears moved into his place and Beatlemania went on. It was a business decision. Despite the many different physical characteristics that are blatantly obvious to most, those who can't accept truth, will never see it. It's very sad that people are so co-dependent that it will alter their reality.
Terry Knight was Grand Funk Railroads original manager. Intact, Terry Knight and The Pack had members of GFR in the band. When he left, they changed their name to "The Pack". That band would break up, and would morph into GFR. Terry also ripped GFR out of tons of money and royalties in the early part of their career, but that's a whole other topic to discuss.
There used to be some interesting videos on RUclips, explaining how Paul may have died, and was replaced. The last few years, all such videos have been deleted/banned. I very much feel angry that vast amounts of information, across many topics, are no longer available. If we cannot access a range of opinions, and make up our own opinion, the we ARE NOT FREE!
They're not gone just much harder to find. John Halliday is the original Paul McCartney, Paul didn't die but was replaced. John Halliday was actually appointed caretaker for the original McCartney home, and there's video for you to see him alive and well.
I have seen pictures of him, holding his cigarette and playing guitar left handed, and right handed. The change was the date of this accident. That's all I can say.
The Beatles stopped touring in (1966). Billy Shepard aka Billy Campbell came in after the death of biological Paul. If you observe the photos of Paul versus Faul after Sgt. Pepper, it is obvious that it is not the same person. William Campbell is one hell of a musician, who could read, write, arrange/produce music. Billy was proficient in playing--bass, guitar, piano, keyboards, strings, drums, percussion, and horns. William Campbell and George Martin were connected more so than the other Beatles, due to the fact they were more evolved in music. Lennon was threatened by Billy, and his relationship to George Martin. When Lennon wrote, "How can you sleep?" Sent Billy & his Wings into a defensive mode. If you analyze the lyrics to Billy's songs--Band on Run, My Brave Face, Live & let die, Let him in, Coming up, he is literally telling you the story. Billy is a brilliant musician, who also is a smug, elitists. Who was critical of the other Beatles in their playing ability in the studio. Billy is both arrogant and aware that Billy Shears is him.
@@patrickthomas8890 It makes perfect sense that Billy is taller, was more proficient in playing the bass, guitar, keys, strings, horns, drums, percussion, in addition to being able to read music, produce and arrange. Biological Paul was shorter, with a round face, and deeper voice. The Beatles stopped touring in (1966) for a reason. John Lennon couldn't stand Billy and was transparent about his feelings about Faul being controlling. You need to listen to the lyrics on "How do you sleep" where Lenno says, " those freaks were right when they said you were dead."
The plus side of all this look at all the great music they made for the next five years ! Billy pushed The fab three way beyond their musical abilities.
@@davidc1944 William Campbell AKA Billy Shepheard, was musically superior to the rest of the Beatles. Billy was proficient in playing guitar, bass, strings, keyboard, piano, horns, drums, and percussion. He could read, write, and arrange music. Once Billy produced Sgt. Pepper the quality of the songs evolved in a major way. Ringo explained he hardly played on it. Billy was a perfectionist and was critical of the playing of George, Ringo, and John. Biological Paul doesn't sound anything like Faul.
As my childhood memories recall the real Paul was not as outgoing as the current Paul but more reserved and quieter. Another clue perhaps. Truth is stranger than fiction
I always thought this song was about Saint Paul, the place, and the Beatles references were because he liked the Beatles. That's probably because I grew up in Minneapolis and didn't know anything about the 66 car accident anyways (what with me not being alive yet and all).
Its about Paul and the fact he did not get the chance to work with him. There was no car accident. Paul left the band in Oct 66. He returned briefly in 68 but rarely seen in public for around 30 years afterwards.
My take on this is that something clearly happened, whatever it was, to make The Beatles change direction. Their music evolved perfectly to Rubber Soul and then Revolver. A clear genetic progression. Then things got really weird.
GOLLY GEE! MY DOG READ THIS AND HOWLED AND STARTED TO LICK HIS BALLS! ARE YOU SENDING SIGNALS TELEPATHICALLY? ARE YOU FAR BEYOND THE GLITTERING WALLS OF THE BEATLE UNIVERSE? HOW FAR OUT ARE YOU, PAUL 1774?COME IN .................. DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vinyl Rewind! Clues? "Memoirs of Billy Shears" was reportedly published by Paul McCartney's own publishing company, and the author E U Harriet been granted copyrights to all Beatles songs, which adds an intriguing layer of credibility to its claims. Another compelling piece of evidence is the apparent change in McCartney’s handwriting. In the Erika Hubers paternity case, a German court allegedly compared McCartney’s pre-1966 signature-retrieved from a museum-with his current signature and found no match! I’ll admit, I initially thought the "Paul is Dead" theory was absurd. However, after doing some in-depth research, I’ve discovered there’s a surprising amount of hard evidence-not just subtle clues hidden in Beatles records. For example, compare McCartney’s eye color: before 1966, he had brown eyes, while post-1966, his eyes are green. This, alongside other discrepancies, raises legitimate questions that are worth exploring further.
John was with Neil in West Germany to play parts in "How I Won The War". Ringo was in Surrey at the time. Epstein was with Paul and George in the studio. After an argument with Brian, Paul leave in a huff, he slam the door. After Paul left the studio, he pick up a girl named Donna. The girl recognised him and gone mad. Paul ran a red light and was hit by a yellow truck that knocked them across the wet road into a pole, resulting in his decapitation and a car fire. It was on Sunday, 11 September 1966, just minutes before midnight. The interesting thing is that Paul predicted his death and he told and prepared everyone's about this.
@@djsalinas1536 In his dreams. He dreamed of this very often. And he told everyone that. And he prepared everyone for that. The telegram sent by Brian Epstein to John Lennon in Germany reads: "Paul was right." John initially thought it was a joke by Paul. When he realized it was true, John went crazy.
Simple questions: Has any member of any tribute band - Beatles, Elvis, Zeppelin etc, ever ever ever made you think you were possibly seeing the real thing? Did any member of any tribute band appear on countless TV interviews as the person he was impersonating without raising a single eyebrow? Have you ever watched a Beatles tribute band on RUclips and think - that's them! A lost video! Ever? Magical Mystery Tour (a PM song) presented The Beatles as magicians. A magician's trick is 'misdirection'. Watch the left hand while the right hand makes the switch - or in this case watch the left handed bass player instead of the right handed guitar player. It's more likely to me that John was killed in a car accident in '66 - after all it was HIS appearance that changed daily for the next four years - admit it, so often you couldn't keep up - and then stopped changing after the group ended. Late '66 was when Yoko came on the scene - maybe she was fake John's girl and that was part of the deal. Finally, John's last LP was called "Double Fantasy". Maybe he was the double and it was all a fantasy. Maybe that's why he was killed. Or maybe I"m full of it just like anyone that thinks Paul was replaced on the spot with an impersonator that would go on to write Sgt Pepper, Hey Jude, Back in the USSR, Black Bird, Let it Be, etc etc. Or maybe I'm a man maybe I"m a lonely man who's in the middle of something that he doesn't really understand. Either way, I"m amazed that this is still a conspiracy that people cling to.
Oddly enough the first Beatles conspiracy theory was about John dying and being replaced. It all started with the semaphores on the cover of "Help!" NVJL ... and we always thought they spelled Help 😂🤣 Anyways, to cut a short story even shorter; someone decided that this stood for "New vocalist John Lennon" (obviously). So when that particular rumour died a death (pun intended) without selling any albums they did it all over again with Paul. I have my own theory. John died in 1980. George died about 2000 & something. Paul and Ringo are still here, rocking on like old boomers should.
A conspiracy people cling to? What a weird thing to say, I probably know 5 or 6 people at least who realize Paul was replaced and I don't think any of us are clinging to it, it's just the truth like any other truth.
Read ‘Shadow of a Bass Man’. RUclips videos by the same name. They have done extensive research. Compared side by side photos of Paul and Paul-2.0. Billy Shears had plastic surgery done, learned to play left handed. John, George and Ritchie were never the same after November 1966. They lost their best mate and hated that they had to pretend that the replacement was never going to replace Paul!
Ed Young It’s going to be called Get Back from what I’ve heard and is scheduled to come out in theaters in September. They are also planning on releasing a remastered version of the original film.
The Beatles' strummed songs were sent to a Professor musicologist. He gave them a classical treatment. None of the Beatles could read music. The Professor's name might have been De Bono.
If Paul was dead and they did'nt want anyone to know, why would they leave lots of riddles & clues in their work for them to be exposed, like a cryptic game?
It's called "Masterfully speaking" as explained in the book Memoirs of Billy Shears". In order to not break a contract, they can only speak in riddles. Alot of mysterious accidents happened to anyone who broke the contract. 😮
@moinbathing2002 , because John Lennon felt guilty, due to the fact that he and Paul had argued, just before Paul left the studio and died that same night.
I remember when this Paul hoopla was going down, yes I'm that old. I was in 6th grade and one girl snuck a small AM radio and an earphone(!) In to the class and spent a week sobbing in the back of the classroom. She had the radio with her to get updates.
I was even younger and it was my Halloween costume in third grade. I wore a black turtleneck and pasted a bunch of news headlines on my shirt saying "Paul is Dead" etc. I thought I was so clever. Wish I had a picture!
According to Wikipedia, Terry Knight didn’t just “pass away”. He was murdered. His daughter’s meth-addled boyfriend took the rap for it, but witnesses recall seeing a left-handed man with a silver hammer leaving the scene. I may have made that last bit up. Or did I?!
I am from Liverpool and went to school with Ringo Starr's cousin. There is some mileage in these rumours, plus Paul's extended family in Liverpool seemed to stop taking to him after 1967. Just sayin.
You might like to know, this song was recorded by Shane(Shane Hales) who was British born but records this song and it was released in New Zealand where he has lived for the last fifty years,it was played often on radio and on one occasion my band (the tremeloes) had the opportunity to perform the song as a backing band for Shane at a club in Auckland in the early 90's.
I was looking for the New Zealand connection. Thanks. I recall Shane wrote the song and sent it to Paul McCartney. McCartney wrote back that he liked the song.
I have not eaten or drunk any medication for more than twenty-five years.The antibiotics I get each day from raw lettuce salad ,usually with cheese and a can of tuna.
Paul really did die in 1966. For all the doubters, read The Memoirs of Billy Shears. Then you will know. Also really look at the early pics of Paul and then later of "Faul". Faul (William Shepherd) is much taller than Paul was for starters. William Shepherd had a lot of plastic surgery to look as much like Paul as possible but there was no changing a height difference. That is why they never performed in public again. It would have been too noticeable.. Although Paul can sound somewhat like Paul at times, his voice does not have the richness of Paul.
Are we not even going to mention that Terry, who was born and raised in Flint Michigan, picks up an English accent while he’s singing? That’s a real conspiracy theory for you! Lol!
Heather Mills, his disabled ex wife spoke the truth already, good luck finding it now on YT. Its the biggest backstabbing in the history of music. Maybe the world. She was afraid for her kids life and said "Paul betrayed the world beyond belief", and not cheating on her either.
Paul's Death was reported in Australia and several Areas in the US Sept 1966. Paul grew several Inches at the End of 1966. "Facial Recognition Dimensions do NOT match 1966 vs post 66. Ears, Eyes, Chin, Teeth" If you have a Musical Ear there are also Changes in Voice and annunciation. {who cares about the Album Covers and such}
Does a difference of opinion aggravate you to the point of insulting their intelligence? The pattern is always the same and the insults are always one sided….is there a need or a must to protect the mainstream narrative for some reason 🤔🤔🤔
Paul Died, in a Car crash on the M1, in the Fall of 66,...The Beatles, quit Playing Live in 66,...their Manager Brian Epstien, committed suicide in 67,...,the Beatles legally disbanded in 1970,...Mal Evans, The Beatles Roady and 6th Beatle was Murdered in California, in 1976, for Pointing an air Rifle at a Policeman, He was shot before he could release His Auto Biography of his Band Mates,...Lennon, was assassinated in 1980,...George, was attacked and Nearly Killed in,1999,....Ringo, ain't talking,...and Sir Billy keeps raking in the Doe!
The visual evidence is very strong, I am not saying I am fully sold on the "Paul is dead" rumor, but there are definitely a lot of elements to make a case. The physical differences are hard to deny: rounded vs oval face, different mouth and nose. The difference in the accents and the way "Faul" says "you know" constantly vs Paul, barely using that filler... unfortunately the world will never know and it comes down to what each of us believe.
Faul also says "filum" instead of "film". Paul pronounced it correctly. I actually think Paul did die but the 'Crown' was charging them 95%taxes and with the "Cute one" gone, their cash cow would fold up. Then Brian was taken out and the others continued out of fear. I hear John was going to come forward and tell the world just before his untimely death. At the induction into the R&R, George let it out that "We still miss Paul". Faul didn't show up so George could have said "Paul couldn't make it" or " we miss Paul" but the word STILL. Spoke volumes. I think after that comment George had the intruder who stabbed him. I think Jane Asher showed the world the truth. When she was escorted by Faul she never smiled in any pictures that I saw. They each had to toe the line. I guess messing with the Crown shortens your life line.
John Halliday is the original Paul. Who was actually appointed caretaker of the original McCartney home. You can find video of him. Alive and well. Both McCartney and Lennon were replaced. Multiple actors were used. The Fab(fabricated) Four were a BRANDed commodity, and PSYOP run by MI6 & Tavistock. There's way more evidence than can be ignored, if you really know how to investigate. The replacement for the role of John Lennon is the one who got shot, not the original. Cheers.
"Very strong"? You're seeing things mate, you're seeing things you want to see; it's called warped confirmation bias. The world already knows, well those of us who are able to think clearly and logically, and there's zero doubt it's the same guy. Sorry, but your stuff about different nose etc is total bollocks because everything about him is exactly the same, but go ahead and debate me if you wish. I've looked into this properly and intelligently, and I doubt you have, in fact I know you haven't. Because if you had there would be no doubt it was the same guy.
@@daddykornflakes jane did not marry the imposter. You are a shill. Go on believing what you want. You are a dieing breed. Bio Paul has been gone for decades.
7:38 - that ain't Paul McCartney. That is a guy who could and did win prizes and competitions simulating Paul McCartney. The thumbnail picture for this video ain't him either.
Well yes, Paul did write “Hey Jude” for Julian as a cheerup song, but I definitely believe the bit here he could’ve seemed sad. From what I’ve heard Paul actually was a little depressed a bit during the Beatles’ turbulent times before the breakup.
Listen to the words of Hey Jude. It was basically saying there is sadness in his life because of John, but hey go out and get laid, you might feel better. That’s what this song is basically about. “So let it and then let it out. Hey Jude, begin, your waiting for someone to perform with.
I really like this theory, not because I believe in it, but because it's very intriguing and intereseting as a story. A member dying, the cover up, the other members giving clues 'cause they can't really talk about it but they don't want to stay silent, someone living someone elses life. It is a very interesting story and I think the Beatles might have used it as a publicity strategy, after all we're still talking about it. The fans wanted to know more about it and The Beatles gave us "clues" to speculate, even if it wasn't intentional, it's brilliant, easter eggs for the fans to look for. And just in case it was real, we'll never know, they'll take the "secret" to the grave.
Remember Ringo stated I'm 70 years old I don't want to Take this with me to the grave. Paul did die and was replaced by a look alike. Three days latter Ringos house in California burnt to the ground.. Nothing said there after..
@@davidc1944 Tom Petty was in the Willburys with George, someone burned his house too, Roy died very unexpectedly as well while they were in the charts too.
Paul did die in a car crash 11-9-1966 and was replaced by William (Billy) Spears. Also, rumors about Paul's death did not start in Detroit, MI, USA, it started in London.
@@WhoCares-dl8zr Oh well.. Not my problem. But I will say this, what I have said, without references, is just as valid, as this stupid video. Maybe a bit more, considering I was alive then and heard the rumor start out of London, not Detroit, MI.
@@robinmead5826 so is it not possible that the U.S. would eventually hear rumors? And then some people just ran with that theory? And once rumors started, they just steamrolled. LOTS of people don't believe he's dead but love the fun and speculation of the conspiracy theory.
Unfortunately Paul McCartney never did hear this but his replacement William Shepherd most likely did. I used to be a vehement denier and huge Beatles fan I still am (and a good musician) but it's obvious to me now.
Terry Knight was part of Terry Knight and the Pack, a garage band from Michigan, which also included Mark Farner and Don Brewer of Grand Funk Railroad. After the Pack dissolved, Terry Knight went on to manage/produce GFR, and also ripped them off tons of money and fame (they were very popular in the 70s but could have been more famous).
I have no idea why i believe this conspiracy but i do. Maybe too many trips staring at abby road poster. It never made sense to me why everything including their relationships fell apart so fast. But everything starts to make sense when you realize paul died.
If Paul did die in 1966 the British government would have done everything and anything to cover it up, imagine mass teenage hysteria and suicides, loss of billions of pounds, and loss of influences behind the iron curtain.. if that was so whoever took the roll of Paul on, was fantastic and through all his work since 1966, Beatles, wing and solo work, he deserves a knighthood and all our grateful gratitude. Only sad part if that was true , is that Paul’s grave is unmarked and we’re not able to pay our respects to him.
That is very true. But the phrase you are mentioning is the only second of the Beatles entire catalog that has been tampered with. In all original 1967 records, John said “I buried Paul.” After 1967 a voice actor (none of the Beatles) changed it to “Cranberry Sauce.” Evey time someone uploads the 1967 version, RUclips strikes the video for “copywrite infringement.”
@@michaelkennedy6415 Except the official version of SFF (with the promo film) right here on YT IS the original track. And yes it does say "I buried Paul". John invented "cranberry sauce" in the seventies in order to dodge an interview question. Paul then added it to the Anthology mix in order to keep the hoax alive. I don't know where your theory came from but after 50 years as a fan, this is the first time I'm hearing it.
@@handle-schmandle My theory just comes from listening to all the different record pressings over the years where I can distinctly hear both versions. I’m not sure if you were trying to say the Anthology version reverted back to the original “Paul is Dead.” If that is true. I did not know that.
@@michaelkennedy6415 There have been three different commonly held theories about this for over fifty years, but you had to make up your own? And look how matter of fact your first comment is, as if you’re sharing the actual truth. No offense, but this is exactly why there’s so much bullsh*t in the world.
Paul wrote that song for him. He wants the world to know now he is William not Paul and he s written a book to explain it all memoirs of billy shears , you can not put a song out with all the Beatles songs on without their permission He did die in 66 it’s 100% true
Four More Clues For You All: Here Is More Proof: Number One, The Beatles went into the studio years cuz Paul's replacement couldn't go around the world not being able to know things, people would expect Paul to know. The man who replaced Paul wouldn't recognize people, remember events etc! Number two, John Lennon and Paul McCartney were best friends, now, their relationship is said to have went south, and most people believe that, but they didn't have a falling out but it was not the same man! Number three, Jane was asked and agreed for 1 year to go on publicly claiming that she was with Paul's replacement but this is not true, it was not the original Paul McCartney, Jane agreed to stay with him for the public for the media for one year's time. Number four, Paul's replacement broke union with John, George and Ringo who all choose Phil Spectre to be their new manager, what Paul's replacement chose Linda's father. He was not really one of them, at least not from the start! He Who Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear! #PaulMcCartney #TheBeatles #TheFabFour #JohnLennon #GeorgeHarrison #RingoStar
Paul sang "Yesterday" w/a string quartet back-up in 1965. Then Paul died. Listen to "Yesterday" in 1966 to hear Faul singing his impersonation of Paul (RIP). Note to Faul: Confess before you're singing "Yesterday" in the lake of fire w/the devil as your back-up screamer. 👿
To answer your question, yes, Paul was aware of the song. However, Terry Knight did not get the kudos. It was New Zealand singer Shane who covered the song only a few months after Terry Knight recorded his version. Shane received a congratulations letter from Paul McCartney as the song did hit the top charts in New Zealand. Though it failed to become a worldwide hit.
Biological Paul is dead. Die 09/11/1966 The individual playing him is Billy Shears. The clues are out there if one is willing to look. The history beyond the Beatles and biological paul's death is dark.
Brian Epstein's death happened (August 1967). Just imagine if Epstein hadn't died. We probably would have had the Beatles around at least a little bit longer.
Paul did a show on the marquee of ed sulivan theater recently this was a return to their first big break In the audio you can hear paul talking to one of the stage hands, that had been there since pauls first appearance in 60s. He had helped paul with an equipment problem.Any faux paul would never have known about this incident
Mr. Rewind, may I suggest you do a video on the Love album? If you haven't heard of it, it's a remix of many different songs throughout The Beatles' career done by Giles and George in 2006. It would be really interesting to see what you think about it and to hear what parts you recognise from the originals. Keep it up!
One thing that I have noticed is that all the Beatles remained the same,their hair just grew longer. But Paul changed a bit from more happy go lucky to more serious and sarcastic. It looks like a tougher Paul who likes to take charge. But like Socrates I know I know nothing,
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
If we started taking psychodelic lyrics seriously, John Lennon is a Walrus, and The Beatles are made of egg, man.
Been there done that lol!!!!
Eric Burdon was the egg man.
@@MsAppassionata He struck me as more of a bacon type.
Andrew Barratt Lol. I don’t know exactly what you mean by that but the reason I mentioned Burdon was because of this quote from the book “The Beatles A Hard Day’s Write” by Steve Turner: “The ‘eggman’ was supposedly a reference to Animals’ vocalist Eric Burdon who had an unusual practice of breaking eggs over his female conquests while making love and became known among his musical colleagues as ‘the eggman’.“
@@MsAppassionata I did not know that, and I apologise for my flippant response, earlier.
So they found someone who looked just like Paul, sounded like Paul, played lefthanded bass, wrote songs just like him. And just in time for the next album.
Yeah it's impossible, these conspiracy theorists are out of their minds.
Lol conspiracy theorists are out of their minds!
And nobody in the Beatles circles seemed particularly grieving in that time period. Somebody surely would have been terribly upset about this. Not like hundreds of people would be immediately suspicious of a replacement. Can you imagine if someone you knew well was replaced by someone who looked a lot like them? You'd still know, and pretty fast.
Ya,,,,,,,and they never played live again after the New Paul made his debut.....LOL.....oh ya, and the New Paul went on to play with his former band mates before he was paul.>>….LOL>...
Actually Paul McCartney became amberdextorous and could play guitar both left and right handed.
Plot twist: Billy Shears actually died in 1966 and was replaced by Paul McCartney.
Lol
lalaallalalalalallalalala
O:
0: I've seen this comment before and it's the best plot twist ever
Insert spitting out cereal picture
Here's my take on this issue.
The Beatles are still laughing their arses off, here and on the other side.
Except Paul... he’s sad
@@dogol284 Paul and John....cause BOTH their lives were taken before their time....SAD !!
Well Paul McCartney most likely doesn't exist anymore. It's likely the clone who took his place Faul or Baul are grinning and laughing.
Interesting theory.
This guy says the the Paul is dead thing started in 1969. Funny, we first heard and began looking for them on the Mystery Tour lp in 1967...
The strange thing about this song is that 60 years later You still can't buy it, Amazon will not sell it. Whoever bought the copyrights to the song does not want someoneelse making money off of it.
Maybe there are awkward legal issues based on the fact he blatantly sings a bunch of famous Beatles songs on the one track?
It's just a diss track. Come on. The meeting went badly and Knight felt betrayed.
I hadn't thought about that!
That’s the first thing I thought too. Rappers do this all the time.
hahaha the psychedelic diss track
Probably because he's a S**t writer
@@idaslpdhr The best lyrics in this song were stolen by the Dollar Tree Chipmunks.
“On today’s single showcase we are going to DIEve into the music”
Why
Is that a clue?
ozrockclassic have you watched the video? Its what he said,
@@iridescent-frog1059 hes aloud to say that ok its not a clue it what he wants to say
If they could replace Paul McCartney with a another human that looked like him, talked like him, played left-handed bass like him, acted like him and sang like him...all within a matter of months - then hell! Why not do the same thing again and replace all four Beatles with the same qualifications? If it's that easy- get on it!
Oh, and George Martin too, just for good measure.
Hey Mark, you're a genius! I want in!
Problem with that is the replacement was none of those things
Exactly!!
But you hit all the critical points. He doesn't look like him. He's taller, different chin, different eye color, different ears (the Wired article). It's just that we had the original Paul for only 5 years of their '63 -67 period. We've had the new Paul for 50+ years, so he has become the definitive Paul. The original Paul had a much deeper speaking voice and a very wry wit. Watch the pre 67 press conferences.
Post 66 Paul did not look like Paul, many women at that time didn't even recognize him, if you watch earlier videos, Paul rarely looked at his fretboard, he had a different bass style too which paralleled Jack Bruce and John Entwisle, after 66 the bass was recorded afterward the songs were recorded. He is much taller.
1969? Lennon already mocked "Paul is dead" rumours on the White Album with Glass Onion.
"Here's another clue for you all, the walrus was Paul."
He's joking. He played The Walrus in the video.
Well, John Lennon wrote I Am The Walrus because a fan sent him a letter saying that they were analysing beatles' lyrics at school, so he decided to write what is probably one of the weirdest songs ever
@@junkhead_92 In an interview, he stated that he was referring to the Walrus and the Carpenter in Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland." He had mistakenly thought the Walrus was the good guy in the poem and when he realized that the Walrus was a bad guy he then stated in Glass Onion that the walrus was Paul. It has nothing to do with Paul being dead.
@@greglarry11 I can't find it
@@greglarry11 Rest in Peace James Paul McCartney.
To find someone who looks like him, sounds like him, has his ability to write songs and perform them and then get everyone else including his bandmates and family to get in on the act is mental.
But the idiots will tell that that is exactly what happened. And they really believe that there actually was a Billy Shears.
@@Kirke182 no bill shepherd
Well, when the Queen, MI5 and the CIA all come to your house and threaten you (as stated elsewhere here), what are you going to do ??? LOL 🤪🤪🤪
@@cliffheywood1355 You can’t agree on the name or the date of the “ accident”!
@@Shepards-tone “ He never wrote anything post-Revolver that was as good” ….well, that, right there, is ludicrous. And that isn’t just MY opinion.
And Blackbird, Hey Jude, Abbey Road second side medley, Day in the Life aren’t as good…. !? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have a theory that will blow your minds.
John was shot in 1980, George died in 2001, and Paul and Ringo are both still alive.
Oh, and Ringo has magic sunglasses that stop ageing.
I'd love to get those magic sunglasses for myself.
Where can i get ringo's magic sunglasses
Pauls writing style changed dramatically. The Beatles were the biggest export Britain had. Nothing would surprise me. The music business is full of people getting knocked off. No one wants to believe it.
It's impossible for people to change, Paul looks nothing like his baby photos so my theory is that he died as a baby
@@WhoCares-dl8zr He actually died in the womb, and was replaced by Sir James Paul McCartney by Doctor Robert. Or maybe it was James Sir Bensen Mum, who knows.
My theory is that the song Penny Lane has absolutely nothing to do with Denny Lane, and Mr Kite is not Jewish
John and George's writing styles changed drastically too. It's called having originality along with extreme talent. The Beatles were pioneers of rock and roll. Both in their songwriting, and in the studio. After they became the biggest band in the world they had the opportunity to experiment in the studio, and the luxury of brilliant engineers to make their ideas possible. They took recording to the next level, and did things nobody had ever done before.
John Halliday is the original Paul. Didn't die.
Terry Knight was stabbed to death by his daughter's boyfriend in 2004 at age 61.
What the hell
Meth is a helluva drug...
@Dean Morrow Or was he killed 35 years after the fact to silence him? It's just like JFK...one after the other every witness keeps dying off of "old age". ;-)
Was it for making this single?
@@Porkcylinder Took them long enough if it was lol. I'm going with 'unrelated'.
this is basically the first diss track
Like A Rolling Stone was before this.
Lennon's 'How Do You Sleep' from 1971 is basically a 5 minute roast for Billy.
In case no one has mentioned it yet, the rumor actually started in early 1967 when The Beatles fan magazine responded to rumors that Paul had died in a car crash.
Exactly. The whole Paul is dead thing was cooked up by Paul, his occult pals and EMI records. Sgt. Pepper's is full of clues. He's still playing the game folks.
@@duderama6750 Yep. Here is another clue for you all: The Anthology 3 cover. The pictures of John, George, and Ringo are all from the cover of Let It Be. The picture of Paul for Let It Be is torn away to reveal a picture of Paul from the Rubber Soul album. The original Paul. That is NOT an accident. That was done on purpose. This was a multi-million-dollar product they were releasing. Nothing was left to chance; it was all thought out ahead of time. They were STILL promoting the “Paul Is Dead” idea in the 1990’s. Right in our face for all of us to see. And like 67 says, I am guessing he is STILL playing it today.
@@spiritualarchitect4276 Agreed but does it always have to be the occult? Couldn’t it be that he just had a twisted sense of humor?
@@handle-schmandle Agree, nothing to do with the occult. Just some 20-year-old pot heads with time on their hands joking around.
@@spiritualarchitect4276 And a 79 year old keeping it going. Go look at the McCartney III cover.
My point earlier though is that the PID always cite Black Magic or Devil worship or whatever. I just think Sir Paul has a very twisted sense of humor.
I like the room this guy is sitting in.....
i like the chair!
A lot of people felt betrayed when the Beatles got into a more experimental sound. Earlier fans of the band felt alienated from the changes made to the band. That’s what St. Paul is about.
LOSING THE TEENYBOPPERS CUZ OF ALL BEATLES BEING MARRIED, WEARING BEARDS AND GROWING UP, THE BEATLES WANTED TO AVOID BEING TYPECAST AS LIGHTWEIGHTS. SO YOKO CONVINCED JOHN TO GO FOR IT! LINDA CONCINVED PAUL TO LET HIS INNER BOOGIE OUT UNTIL KLEIN WAS GONE AND THEN IN '73 TO MAKE SOME CASH - WITHOUT THAT SNEAKY BUGGER. BILL WYMAN HAD TO BRING GOONS TO GET CASH OUT OF KLEIN, INSTEAD OF KLEIN BEING PROPERLY COMPLIANT.
They did do a Paul McCartney look alike contest back then and no results were ever given, and in a speech made by George after John's death, George said "we all loved John, and we all loved Paul.
It's interesting that it was just a Paul look alike contest, not all the Beatles. Why just Paul?
because paul was the dead one? @@LumiMoonCh
@@LumiMoonCh, exactly.
Seems the Beatles were not just ahead of their time in making rock pop music, but also in realizing how much money can be made from conspiracies, imagine if they had social media back then. Wow.
You mean they kill the real paul mc?
BOOM. It blows my mind why people don’t see the middle ground. It fits their MO perfectly. Why isn’t it most likely it was a joke marketing stunt instead of some conspiracy theory is so strange to me. The reason why a lot of smart people consider it is because a ton of the almost obvious art work references. At what point is it obvious that the message they are wanting to send is about Paul. Here is the kicker. The only rational reason they would hint at something like that is because???? Certainly wouldn’t make sense to hint at it if they wanted it a big secret.
Please dear lord soundshaper, tell me how in the world did the Beatles bank on the PID theory? - unless you’re talking about those who listened to records backwards. They ruined the records 4X faster and had to buy new ones. Give me ONE other example!!!
@@goodcarma9659 haha!
@@goodcarma9659 Now they are gonna try to SCARE us with this UFO BS Dont fall for it Covid was there first attempt to control us AI is also in thier plans to depopulate human race
Seriously, you can do this conspiracy with anybody. There are more clues that John had died in the sixties than Paul. Who's all in white on the Abbey Road cover. John was 28 at the time of the cover shoot. Paul was 27. "Come Together...right now...over me." The song Good Morning Good Morning: "Nothing to do save his life...call his wife in." John was married at the time, not Paul. I'm Only Sleeping. He said "I Am the Walrus"...and "I know what it's like to be dead." His "baby's in black". On the cover of Rubber Soul, he's the only one staring into camera. I'm sure there are many more but these are off the top of my head. Can do it for the others too.
His appearance changed every four days - until the band broke up. Happiness is a Warm Gun.
"One and one and one is three... come together over me". Opening lines of Come Together? 'Shoot me...shoot me...." releases Double Fantasy (maybe he was the double and his time with the band was a fantasy)... gets shot.
..the refutation is that Johns' songs on AR are adult man songs, while Pauls' are largely rot...ie side 2...
did u say Paul was 27?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@MrmelodyUs He was 27 when they took the cover photo of Abbey Road. One of the "Paul is dead" clues is the license plate of the Volkswagen on the same cover says "28IF". As in "28 if he had lived."
Robert Saul I thought the line was "she said I know what it's like to be dead"
The Paul is Dead rumor started in '67, dude. The rumour began circulating around 1967. My mom, who lived in Kentucky, would talk about it with her friends in '67 when she was still High School. It went *wider* over the next two years, but it was already a thing in '67.
Because millions of Women were in Love with Paul. If they say it's not Paul, then it's Not. These Women were madly in love and knew every feature of him. Women's heart don't lie when they are truly in love. They Like what they Like.
@@InteleVision-Vic That's why women know it IS him. Micro-expressions don't lie. Adam never said his mother and her friends believed it, only that it was already a thing in 1967 that they were a buzz about.
@@Kieop you can believe what you want, it's no skin off my balls.
@@InteleVision-Vic I'm one of the millions 😉
Did anyone hear the special bulletin that interrupted an episode of the Monkees sitcom that one of the Beatles had died in a car crash?
My guess is that he met The Beatles who he'd idolized, but he met them at the time they were in the throws of breaking up, so they weren't at the best from a personality perspective. I'd say Paul was his hero, he met him and it turned out he wasn't all he'd built him up to be. That seems far more likely. The MacLen thing would purely be because he referenced so many Beatles songs and because he was on Capital.
I'd say that's a pretty good probability.
Exactly my thinking, their meeting at Apple didn't go well, Knight flew home feeling pissed off and wrote this effort.
McCartney would definitely have been aware of this record though, having met Knight recently and also having a financial interest in Maclen Music. Remember the music world was much smaller in those days.
I don't understand why the song wasn't a hit. If I was Paul and heard the song I'd have immediately called him up and made peace to get the thing properly released, you'd have to be a real dick to block it and he clearly didn't. You've got to remember, musicians back then were actually pretty bitchy about other musicians even if they were great friends. Dylan was really dismissive of Tomorrow Never Knows apparently, they were all at it, which I think was healthy. Saint Paul has novelty one hit wonder written all over it, and Paul by virtue of being in a pop band who hung out with intellectual types would have had a fairly thick skin to swipes I imagine.
It's "throes," moron.
yeah, the lyrics to me don't read like he's memorializing Paul, it reads like he's annoyed at how negotiations happened and he's mocking their most popular songs as well as taking a dig at mccartney.
It is pretty obvious that Paul died. Even though Tavistock institute or others from the club, made such a huge cover-up by doctoring photos and videos from '61' to '66'
Qué es el instituto Tavistock?
@@thelonelypiper9562Welcome to another rabbit hole!! 😂😂... Down ya go!
Where can you find this
It’s a fascinating story a lot of evidence is interesting. Watching Heather Mills say she had a box of evidence and something like if the public knew the truth they would be horrified in interviews was pretty shocking. It wouldn’t surprise me at all what goes on in the music industry I’ve had a few friends who have experiences of what goes on there as musicians and nothing would surprise me.
John Halliday is the original Paul McCartney, who didn't actually die, but was replaced. Halliday was appointed caretaker of the McCartney home, and there's video of him alive and well for you to see. It's a strange story indeed. There's so much evidence if you know how to find it. Both McCartney and Lennon were replaced. MI6 & Tavistock were controlling the BRANDed PSYOP commodity, Paul wanted out. And Lennon's replacement is the one who was shot not the original. Cheers. Go find the John Halliday video's.
Jackpot, speak on it everyone's been afraid for years. We know what happened.
I’m fairly sure she’s referring to evidence that he abused her and that he’s an abuser. I wouldn’t like to believe that about Paul, but that’s the most logical conclusion.
@@TheLordGoat you don't
The walrus was paul
Interesting... Fun Fact: not only is William Campbell capable of duplicating all of Paul McCartney’s musical sensibilities and style to the Tee... but according to his 23andMe results, he was able to duplicate Paul McCartney’s genetic ties to his younger brother Michael. This conspiracy runs deep. At any rate, William Campbell rocks.
Have you seen the guy who lives at Paul's childhood home now?
The best impressionist in history was also the best melodist of the 20th century and had the best recall ever for other people’s life stories. Truly talented.
LMFAO!!!
Do you have a link to anything showing his results that can conclusively prove its he who took the test ?
@@anniemaymcneely2013 He’s kidding. There is no William Campbell. Not one who replaced Paul, anyway.
No question Paul died. You can easily see facial differences such as the teeth, palate width, eyes, ear lobes, height, chin, etc.
He didn't die. He left the Beatles, married his first gf and goes by John Halliday! See him on RUclips. Truth is stranger than fiction.
@@KathleenBarrow-gh2ey WHAT? 😮
If you spend enough time looking at the photographs you can 100% tell they are two separate people. Not only is his face longer after 1966, but his eyes are what really give it away. And the eyelashes.
Fingerprints different.The old Paul and the new Paul.
The Beatles manufactured the ‘Paul is Dead’ theory. They were smart enough to know we’d still be sitting here all these years later looking for the answer. It was free press at the time, and something to keep their name relevant and interesting. It was ingenious, and has cemented their position in music history. There is nothing more to it than this.
Yeah, thought the same
We can't find answer and maybe never
So, it goes on forever
Agreed. What the heck else do you make of Lennon singing on the White Album - "Here's another clue for you all/The Walrus was Paul."
If he wasn't talking about this big ruse what the heck else was he talking about?
@Joe Cosgrove hahahahahah
@@malcomtent6374 It had nothing to do with Paul being dead. He was referring to "The Walrus and the Carpenter" in Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland." He had mistakenly thought the walrus in the poem was a good guy when he wrote "I am the Walrus." When he reread the poem and realized the walrus was a bad guy, he then told everyone in "Glass Onion" that the walrus was Paul.
@@Kirke182 What about the "Here's another clue for you all" part of the lyric. What "clue" was John talking about? How many other clues did John leave indicating that the walrus was Paul? If this is "another clue" then he must have left others... clues that the Walrus was Paul. What were they? When and where did he start leaving them? I don't know... I'm not really buying your explanation.
Me: *Sees the title*
Me: “Ah shoot here we go again”
All you have to do is compare photos and I believe it shows there were two Pauls. The original one had a slightly rounder face. The new one has a longer chin and larger mouth. The end of Paul's mouth lined up with the inner corner of his eye. Paul2's mouth lines up with the iris of his eye. And Paul had brown eyes whereas Paul2 has hazel eyes. He also developed quite a few wrinkles from 1966 to 1969. Still, the resemblance is remarkable.
Evidently it's not that hard to find doubles for people as we are seeing now with corrupt politicians and celebrities being swapped out for doubles in the public eye while they're facing justice behind the scenes.
I agree, the man had some surgery as well, including jaw reconstruction( to shorten it).
And had all teeth removed to add dentures for the final touches.
@@waynejean1242 ouch! imagine agreeing to that! actually after 1966 we never see Paul's teeth
Look at the USA release of Introducing the Beatles. Paul has hazel green eyes there. Yet in subsequent color photos up close (teen magazines of which I have two originals) you see Pauls eyes are very brown, no green, no hazel no bluish color like today. There may have been 2 Paul's all along, we just didnt know it.
@@barbj9785 The original definitely was replaced after being killed in a car accident or something. This type of thing has been going on forever but I've only recently discovered it. It's crazy.
If it’s not too much to ask, could you do a review on 3:47 EST by Klaatu. Very great album!
I think he should do Hope instead
beatlesrockbandchris
That is a great one. However, I feel like 3:47 has more variety. I feel it’s a better intro to the band for him. You also can’t go wrong with Calling Occupants.
Klaatu need exposure, too many great songs gone unoticed.
@@beatlesrockbandchris Long live politzania is the best.
Otter's Vintage All-Sorts
Exactly. Art should never go unnoticed.
You don't need to listen to this to realise that James Paul McCartney died in 1966. In 1967, Paul grew three inches, his eyes went from chocolate brown to green, grew another toe on his right foot. His arrest in Japan 1980 and held for 9 days was due to the fact that his fingerprints didn't match his arrest in 1960 Germany. Two Italian anthropologists confirmed that his cranium measures are different and got larger. A voice analysis done in 1969 showed two voices for Paul from 1966 to 1967. Some people refuse to accept the change and can't see the difference but its so obvious if you look closely. Listen to the songs. He don't sound the same from 1967 onwards. There are many clues there.
Show source
Well then how does he remember his childhood memories?
I saw him on his flat earth tour
@@reverendmississippi Is the earth flat?
@@Intrusive_Thought176He can't. There isn't a single shred of evidence concerning the fingerprints. It's also nonsense about the height difference. And McCartneys' eyes are Hazel which can appear either green or brown depending on lighting.
Hidden in plain sight, even down to the naming of Apple Corps (A Paul corpse). One of the great deceits of modern times!
Huh. All these years and I’ve never heard that one. Very good!
@@handle-schmandle That's a new one on me, too. How do folks come up with this stuff?
If you only knew whats in plain sight. Think encryption.
Christ, are you people idiots!!!
Would you refer to your dead best friend mockingly as a Paul corpse? Not everyone else is a sick weirdo okay?
I always find these stories interesting. I also like the Stig O'Hara death rumours with The Rutles!
He wasn't wearing any pants on the cover of Shabby Road.
They were never the same after meeting with that Surrey Mystic, Arthur Sultan, following the death of their manager, Leggy Mountbatten, the guy who lost his leg in the closing overs of World War 2.
And once they started 'taking tea,' and admitting to 'taking tea,' that was it.
@@gary1961 And biscuits
Stig has been dead for ages honestly.
My favorite story is how Nastys girlfriend had a father who started WW2
A cramp of the heart is called angina.If the heart cramp lasts longer than ten minutes it is called a heart attack.
One salient point, males stop growing at around 17, some maybe 19, but that's rare. Paul didn't have a growth spurt in '66 at the age of 24, he died! The taller, lankier Billy Shears moved into his place and Beatlemania went on. It was a business decision. Despite the many different physical characteristics that are blatantly obvious to most, those who can't accept truth, will never see it. It's very sad that people are so co-dependent that it will alter their reality.
I lived through it. Sgt Pepper was not the same band as before.
NONSENSE. You people are gullible fools. How do you explain the right eye socket? DUH!!!
@@concorde2569 I agree!
Paul died.Faul lives.
@@HollyBluePlanet Because of the new recording techniques.
Terry Knight was Grand Funk Railroads original manager. Intact, Terry Knight and The Pack had members of GFR in the band. When he left, they changed their name to "The Pack". That band would break up, and would morph into GFR.
Terry also ripped GFR out of tons of money and royalties in the early part of their career, but that's a whole other topic to discuss.
Read the Memoirs of Billy Shears - it explains a lot of what really happened with Paul and the Beatles
It reveals William's secrets.
Billy did not attend the funeral of Paul's father.
There used to be some interesting videos on RUclips, explaining how Paul may have died, and was replaced.
The last few years, all such videos have been deleted/banned.
I very much feel angry that vast amounts of information, across many topics, are no longer available.
If we cannot access a range of opinions, and make up our own opinion, the we ARE NOT FREE!
They're not gone just much harder to find. John Halliday is the original Paul McCartney, Paul didn't die but was replaced. John Halliday was actually appointed caretaker for the original McCartney home, and there's video for you to see him alive and well.
I have seen pictures of him, holding his cigarette and playing guitar left handed, and right handed. The change was the date of this accident. That's all I can say.
The Beatles stopped touring in (1966). Billy Shepard aka Billy Campbell came in after the death of biological Paul. If you observe the photos of Paul versus Faul after Sgt. Pepper, it is obvious that it is not the same person. William Campbell is one hell of a musician, who could read, write, arrange/produce music. Billy was proficient in playing--bass, guitar, piano, keyboards, strings, drums, percussion, and horns. William Campbell and George Martin were connected more so than the other Beatles, due to the fact they were more evolved in music. Lennon was threatened by Billy, and his relationship to George Martin. When Lennon wrote, "How can you sleep?" Sent Billy & his Wings into a defensive mode. If you analyze the lyrics to Billy's songs--Band on Run, My Brave Face, Live & let die, Let him in, Coming up, he is literally telling you the story. Billy is a brilliant musician, who also is a smug, elitists. Who was critical of the other Beatles in their playing ability in the studio. Billy is both arrogant and aware that Billy Shears is him.
How do you sleep? Was a response to Too Many People on Ram. PID is total nonsense
@@patrickthomas8890 It makes perfect sense that Billy is taller, was more proficient in playing the bass, guitar, keys, strings, horns, drums, percussion, in addition to being able to read music, produce and arrange. Biological Paul was shorter, with a round face, and deeper voice. The Beatles stopped touring in (1966) for a reason. John Lennon couldn't stand Billy and was transparent about his feelings about Faul being controlling. You need to listen to the lyrics on "How do you sleep" where Lenno says, " those freaks were right when they said you were dead."
The plus side of all this look at all the great music they made for the next five years ! Billy pushed
The fab three way beyond their musical abilities.
@@davidc1944 William Campbell AKA Billy Shepheard, was musically superior to the rest of the Beatles. Billy was proficient in playing guitar, bass, strings, keyboard, piano, horns, drums, and percussion. He could read, write, and arrange music. Once Billy produced Sgt. Pepper the quality of the songs evolved in a major way. Ringo explained he hardly played on it. Billy was a perfectionist and was critical of the playing of George, Ringo, and John. Biological Paul doesn't sound anything like Faul.
As my childhood memories recall the real Paul was not as outgoing as the current Paul but more reserved and quieter. Another clue perhaps. Truth is stranger than fiction
I always thought this song was about Saint Paul, the place, and the Beatles references were because he liked the Beatles. That's probably because I grew up in Minneapolis and didn't know anything about the 66 car accident anyways (what with me not being alive yet and all).
Same bro
Its about Paul and the fact he did not get the chance to work with him. There was no car accident. Paul left the band in Oct 66. He returned briefly in 68 but rarely seen in public for around 30 years afterwards.
bro st. paul
minneapolis is better idk why that’s the capital
James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966 and was replaced by William (Billy). This is the truth no matter what.
My take on this is that something clearly happened, whatever it was, to make The Beatles change direction. Their music evolved perfectly to Rubber Soul and then Revolver. A clear genetic progression. Then things got really weird.
Yes, they got into serious mind-altering drugs.
Whether you believe it or not is up to you, The Memoirs of Billy Shears purports to give inside information on the Paul is dead story.
I'm alive y'know
I knew it...
Sexy 💋 💋
no way .... ur in youtube
GOLLY GEE! MY DOG READ THIS AND HOWLED AND STARTED TO LICK HIS BALLS! ARE YOU SENDING SIGNALS TELEPATHICALLY? ARE YOU FAR BEYOND THE GLITTERING WALLS OF THE BEATLE UNIVERSE? HOW FAR OUT ARE YOU, PAUL 1774?COME IN .................. DUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@filmguymike I'M GOBSMACKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Vinyl Geek I love your channel!
Vinyl Rewind! Clues? "Memoirs of Billy Shears" was reportedly published by Paul McCartney's own publishing company, and the author E U Harriet been granted copyrights to all Beatles songs, which adds an intriguing layer of credibility to its claims. Another compelling piece of evidence is the apparent change in McCartney’s handwriting. In the Erika Hubers paternity case, a German court allegedly compared McCartney’s pre-1966 signature-retrieved from a museum-with his current signature and found no match!
I’ll admit, I initially thought the "Paul is Dead" theory was absurd. However, after doing some in-depth research, I’ve discovered there’s a surprising amount of hard evidence-not just subtle clues hidden in Beatles records. For example, compare McCartney’s eye color: before 1966, he had brown eyes, while post-1966, his eyes are green. This, alongside other discrepancies, raises legitimate questions that are worth exploring further.
John was with Neil in West Germany to play parts in "How I Won The War". Ringo was in Surrey at the time. Epstein was with Paul and George in the studio. After an argument with Brian, Paul leave in a huff, he slam the door. After Paul left the studio, he pick up a girl named Donna. The girl recognised him and gone mad. Paul ran a red light and was hit by a yellow truck that knocked them across the wet road into a pole, resulting in his decapitation and a car fire. It was on Sunday, 11 September 1966, just minutes before midnight. The interesting thing is that Paul predicted his death and he told and prepared everyone's about this.
how did he predict his death?? im interested in your story
@@djsalinas1536 In his dreams. He dreamed of this very often. And he told everyone that. And he prepared everyone for that. The telegram sent by Brian Epstein to John Lennon in Germany reads: "Paul was right." John initially thought it was a joke by Paul. When he realized it was true, John went crazy.
I gotta say you really know the real story. The truth needs to be put forth so I have to say thank you.
@@A.Crowley_55 Thanks for the comment. People needs to know the truth.
Do you have any more evidence to back this up?
the sad part is there is a movie about this...
*_yesterday_*
No, I'm talking about a film from 2010 where the "totally real George Harrison" confesses to Paul being dead
@@merrick8274 Lmao that movie is so bad
@@merrick8274 what's the name?
What movie is this??
Simple questions: Has any member of any tribute band - Beatles, Elvis, Zeppelin etc, ever ever ever made you think you were possibly seeing the real thing? Did any member of any tribute band appear on countless TV interviews as the person he was impersonating without raising a single eyebrow? Have you ever watched a Beatles tribute band on RUclips and think - that's them! A lost video! Ever? Magical Mystery Tour (a PM song) presented The Beatles as magicians. A magician's trick is 'misdirection'. Watch the left hand while the right hand makes the switch - or in this case watch the left handed bass player instead of the right handed guitar player. It's more likely to me that John was killed in a car accident in '66 - after all it was HIS appearance that changed daily for the next four years - admit it, so often you couldn't keep up - and then stopped changing after the group ended. Late '66 was when Yoko came on the scene - maybe she was fake John's girl and that was part of the deal. Finally, John's last LP was called "Double Fantasy". Maybe he was the double and it was all a fantasy. Maybe that's why he was killed.
Or maybe I"m full of it just like anyone that thinks Paul was replaced on the spot with an impersonator that would go on to write Sgt Pepper, Hey Jude, Back in the USSR, Black Bird, Let it Be, etc etc. Or maybe I'm a man maybe I"m a lonely man who's in the middle of something that he doesn't really understand. Either way, I"m amazed that this is still a conspiracy that people cling to.
Oddly enough the first Beatles conspiracy theory was about John dying and being replaced.
It all started with the semaphores on the cover of "Help!"
NVJL
... and we always thought they spelled Help 😂🤣
Anyways, to cut a short story even shorter; someone decided that this stood for "New vocalist John Lennon" (obviously).
So when that particular rumour died a death (pun intended) without selling any albums they did it all over again with Paul.
I have my own theory.
John died in 1980.
George died about 2000 & something.
Paul and Ringo are still here, rocking on like old boomers should.
A conspiracy people cling to? What a weird thing to say, I probably know 5 or 6 people at least who realize Paul was replaced and I don't think any of us are clinging to it, it's just the truth like any other truth.
@@TeleCaster66 Except it's not. There's a reason why it's called a freaking conspiracy that is half a century old. Grow up.
@@thatdragon_fromspyro1219 Go back to sleep
@@TeleCaster66 Go back to kindergarten :)
Read ‘Shadow of a Bass Man’. RUclips videos by the same name. They have done extensive research. Compared side by side photos of Paul and Paul-2.0. Billy Shears had plastic surgery done, learned to play left handed. John, George and Ritchie were never the same after November 1966. They lost their best mate and hated that they had to pretend that the replacement was never going to replace Paul!
I love this stuff, never gets old!!! Looking forward to Peter Jacksons Beatles Let It Be!! Finally! Got 3 Bootleg DVD's that all look like crap!
Ed Young It’s going to be called Get Back from what I’ve heard and is scheduled to come out in theaters in September. They are also planning on releasing a remastered version of the original film.
@@MsAppassionata awesome thank you!!!!!
Ed Young You might also want to check out FabFourArchivist. That’s where I got that information. He’s really good on anything Beatle related.
@@MsAppassionata thanks brother I will check him out! Really appreciate the info!!!
Ed Young Sister actually and you’re very welcome. 😊
Even if Paul was dead, he would still be one of the greatest songwriters and musicians of all time.
The Beatles' strummed songs were sent to a Professor musicologist. He gave them a classical treatment. None of the Beatles could read music. The Professor's name might have been De Bono.
@@lloydgretton3079 what
Not likely.
@@eaccristo Pre 1966 outtakes prove Beatles played and wrote own music Let's put THAT silly theory to bed
If Paul was dead and they did'nt want anyone to know, why would they leave lots of riddles & clues in their work for them to be exposed, like a cryptic game?
They wouldn’t. It was just the Beatles messing with us. The clues are real, and Paul is fine.
@@handle-schmandle Paul is not fine, Paul is dead.
@@olskzeri1476 Only in your head; not in the real world.
It's called "Masterfully speaking" as explained in the book Memoirs of Billy Shears". In order to not break a contract, they can only speak in riddles. Alot of mysterious accidents happened to anyone who broke the contract. 😮
@moinbathing2002 , because John Lennon felt guilty, due to the fact that he and Paul had argued, just before Paul left the studio and died that same night.
I remember when this Paul hoopla was going down, yes I'm that old. I was in 6th grade and one girl snuck a small AM radio and an earphone(!) In to the class and spent a week sobbing in the back of the classroom. She had the radio with her to get updates.
I was even younger and it was my Halloween costume in third grade. I wore a black turtleneck and pasted a bunch of news headlines on my shirt saying "Paul is Dead" etc.
I thought I was so clever. Wish I had a picture!
@@LauraNorvig you want as Paul's funeral!
Yea. And they got a replacement bs
According to Wikipedia, Terry Knight didn’t just “pass away”. He was murdered. His daughter’s meth-addled boyfriend took the rap for it, but witnesses recall seeing a left-handed man with a silver hammer leaving the scene. I may have made that last bit up. Or did I?!
I am from Liverpool and went to school with Ringo Starr's cousin. There is some mileage in these rumours, plus Paul's extended family in Liverpool seemed to stop taking to him after 1967. Just sayin.
You might like to know, this song was recorded by Shane(Shane Hales) who was British born but records this song and it was released in New Zealand where he has lived for the last fifty years,it was played often on radio and on one occasion my band (the tremeloes) had the opportunity to perform the song as a backing band for Shane at a club in Auckland in the early 90's.
I was looking for the New Zealand connection. Thanks. I recall Shane wrote the song and sent it to Paul McCartney. McCartney wrote back that he liked the song.
The MIGHTY Tremeloes! ❤
I have not eaten or drunk any medication for more than twenty-five years.The antibiotics I get each day from raw lettuce salad ,usually with cheese and a can of tuna.
Paul really did die in 1966. For all the doubters, read The Memoirs of Billy Shears. Then you will know. Also really look at the early pics of Paul and then later of "Faul". Faul (William Shepherd) is much taller than Paul was for starters. William Shepherd had a lot of plastic surgery to look as much like Paul as possible but there was no changing a height difference. That is why they never performed in public again. It would have been too noticeable.. Although Paul can sound somewhat like Paul at times, his voice does not have the richness of Paul.
You are living with your eyes OPEN.
With what's going on in the world right now i would believe anything. Let's face it it's not the biggest conspiracy in the world.
To be a Saint you have to be dead. I find the whole Faul/Paul McCartney conspiracy theory fascinating.
No, you don't. To be canonized, you have to dead. But all believers are in the communion of saints.
Are we not even going to mention that Terry, who was born and raised in Flint Michigan, picks up an English accent while he’s singing? That’s a real conspiracy theory for you! Lol!
Heather Mills, his disabled ex wife spoke the truth already, good luck finding it now on YT. Its the biggest backstabbing in the history of music. Maybe the world. She was afraid for her kids life and said "Paul betrayed the world beyond belief", and not cheating on her either.
Paul's Death was reported in Australia and several Areas in the US Sept 1966. Paul grew several Inches at the End of 1966. "Facial Recognition Dimensions do NOT match 1966 vs post 66. Ears, Eyes, Chin, Teeth" If you have a Musical Ear there are also Changes in Voice and annunciation. {who cares about the Album Covers and such}
You are living with your eyes open.
Does a difference of opinion aggravate you to the point of insulting their intelligence?
The pattern is always the same and the insults are always one sided….is there a need or a must to protect the mainstream narrative for some reason 🤔🤔🤔
Paul Died, in a Car crash on the M1, in the Fall of 66,...The Beatles, quit Playing Live in 66,...their Manager Brian Epstien, committed suicide in 67,...,the Beatles legally disbanded in 1970,...Mal Evans, The Beatles Roady and 6th Beatle was Murdered in California, in 1976, for Pointing an air Rifle at a Policeman, He was shot before he could release His Auto Biography of his Band Mates,...Lennon, was assassinated in 1980,...George, was attacked and Nearly Killed in,1999,....Ringo, ain't talking,...and Sir Billy keeps raking in the Doe!
ngl now i wanna see a vinyl rewind video about klaatu and the beatles
The visual evidence is very strong, I am not saying I am fully sold on the "Paul is dead" rumor, but there are definitely a lot of elements to make a case. The physical differences are hard to deny: rounded vs oval face, different mouth and nose. The difference in the accents and the way "Faul" says "you know" constantly vs Paul, barely using that filler... unfortunately the world will never know and it comes down to what each of us believe.
Faul also says "filum" instead of "film". Paul pronounced it correctly. I actually think Paul did die but the 'Crown' was charging them 95%taxes and with the "Cute one" gone, their cash cow would fold up. Then Brian was taken out and the others continued out of fear. I hear John was going to come forward and tell the world just before his untimely death. At the induction into the R&R, George let it out that "We still miss Paul". Faul didn't show up so George could have said "Paul couldn't make it" or " we miss Paul" but the word STILL. Spoke volumes. I think after that comment George had the intruder who stabbed him.
I think Jane Asher showed the world the truth. When she was escorted by Faul she never smiled in any pictures that I saw. They each had to toe the line. I guess messing with the Crown shortens your life line.
John Halliday is the original Paul. Who was actually appointed caretaker of the original McCartney home. You can find video of him. Alive and well. Both McCartney and Lennon were replaced. Multiple actors were used. The Fab(fabricated) Four were a BRANDed commodity, and PSYOP run by MI6 & Tavistock. There's way more evidence than can be ignored, if you really know how to investigate. The replacement for the role of John Lennon is the one who got shot, not the original. Cheers.
"Very strong"? You're seeing things mate, you're seeing things you want to see; it's called warped confirmation bias. The world already knows, well those of us who are able to think clearly and logically, and there's zero doubt it's the same guy. Sorry, but your stuff about different nose etc is total bollocks because everything about him is exactly the same, but go ahead and debate me if you wish. I've looked into this properly and intelligently, and I doubt you have, in fact I know you haven't. Because if you had there would be no doubt it was the same guy.
@@hazelkagey6739 Never smiled? Really? I take it you've not seen the 1968 wedding photos?
@@daddykornflakes jane did not marry the imposter. You are a shill. Go on believing what you want. You are a dieing breed. Bio Paul has been gone for decades.
7:38 - that ain't Paul McCartney. That is a guy who could and did win prizes and competitions simulating Paul McCartney. The thumbnail picture for this video ain't him either.
Well yes, Paul did write “Hey Jude” for Julian as a cheerup song, but I definitely believe the bit here he could’ve seemed sad. From what I’ve heard Paul actually was a little depressed a bit during the Beatles’ turbulent times before the breakup.
Listen to the words of Hey Jude. It was basically saying there is sadness in his life because of John, but hey go out and get laid, you might feel better. That’s what this song is basically about. “So let it and then let it out. Hey Jude, begin, your waiting for someone to perform with.
I really like this theory, not because I believe in it, but because it's very intriguing and intereseting as a story. A member dying, the cover up, the other members giving clues 'cause they can't really talk about it but they don't want to stay silent, someone living someone elses life. It is a very interesting story and I think the Beatles might have used it as a publicity strategy, after all we're still talking about it. The fans wanted to know more about it and The Beatles gave us "clues" to speculate, even if it wasn't intentional, it's brilliant, easter eggs for the fans to look for. And just in case it was real, we'll never know, they'll take the "secret" to the grave.
There is no "just in case," clown. It is not a "theory," either. Just a fantasy.
Remember Ringo stated I'm 70 years old I don't want to Take this with me to the grave. Paul did die and was replaced by a look alike. Three days latter Ringos house in California burnt to the ground.. Nothing said there after..
@@davidc1944 Tom Petty was in the Willburys with George, someone burned his house too, Roy died very unexpectedly as well while they were in the charts too.
@@davidc1944 what are your sources?
Edit: to clarify myself
@@davidc1944 Ringo's house burnt down in 1979....when he was 39, not when he was 70. If you can't get your facts straight.
Paul did die in a car crash 11-9-1966 and was replaced by William (Billy) Spears. Also, rumors about Paul's death did not start in Detroit, MI, USA, it started in London.
Man what a great comment! So much proof and evidence! I'm convinced now :)
@@WhoCares-dl8zr Oh well.. Not my problem. But I will say this, what I have said, without references, is just as valid, as this stupid video. Maybe a bit more, considering I was alive then and heard the rumor start out of London, not Detroit, MI.
@@robinmead5826 so is it not possible that the U.S. would eventually hear rumors? And then some people just ran with that theory? And once rumors started, they just steamrolled. LOTS of people don't believe he's dead but love the fun and speculation of the conspiracy theory.
@@televinv8062 of course.
@@robinmead5826 so what year was it that you first heard about this in London?
Terry definitely tried to cash in.
Unfortunately Paul McCartney never did hear this but his replacement William Shepherd most likely did. I used to be a vehement denier and huge Beatles fan I still am (and a good musician) but it's obvious to me now.
P.I.D. Rumors started in 1967 , directly by The Beatles Monthly Magazine ,thru them , directly ......
PID started with the Sgt Pepper album. The clues first showed up in that album.
I thought I was a Beatle expert before I found this channel. This dude is a damn encyclopedia with the minor details he knows.
eh
"Here's another clue for you all; the Walrus was Paul..." Glass Onion, 1968, over a YEAR and a half before PID broke public media........
Nice Segway into an ad, that’s gotta be one of the best I’ve ever seen
There's channel Justice for James Paul McCartney and he got enough evidence of Paul's death.
Absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
this is awe full
Terry Knight was part of Terry Knight and the Pack, a garage band from Michigan, which also included Mark Farner and Don Brewer of Grand Funk Railroad. After the Pack dissolved, Terry Knight went on to manage/produce GFR, and also ripped them off tons of money and fame (they were very popular in the 70s but could have been more famous).
I have no idea why i believe this conspiracy but i do. Maybe too many trips staring at abby road poster. It never made sense to me why everything including their relationships fell apart so fast. But everything starts to make sense when you realize paul died.
Everything starts with the death of Paul McCartney and ends with it. Underneath the wall lies the answer to it all.
I used to love conspiracy theories before they became politicized. They're urban legends, and "Paul Is Dead" was always one of my favorites.
Everything has been politicized lately even sports .Yes it's sickening.
If Paul did die in 1966 the British government would have done everything and anything to cover it up, imagine mass teenage hysteria and suicides, loss of billions of pounds, and loss of influences behind the iron curtain.. if that was so whoever took the roll of Paul on, was fantastic and through all his work since 1966, Beatles, wing and solo work, he deserves a knighthood and all our grateful gratitude. Only sad part if that was true , is that Paul’s grave is unmarked and we’re not able to pay our respects to him.
At the very end of Strawberry Fields you can hear John say "I buried Paul."
Just another clue for you all.
That is very true. But the phrase you are mentioning is the only second of the Beatles entire catalog that has been tampered with. In all original 1967 records, John said “I buried Paul.” After 1967 a voice actor (none of the Beatles) changed it to “Cranberry Sauce.” Evey time someone uploads the 1967 version, RUclips strikes the video for “copywrite infringement.”
@@michaelkennedy6415 Except the official version of SFF (with the promo film) right here on YT IS the original track. And yes it does say "I buried Paul". John invented "cranberry sauce" in the seventies in order to dodge an interview question. Paul then added it to the Anthology mix in order to keep the hoax alive. I don't know where your theory came from but after 50 years as a fan, this is the first time I'm hearing it.
@@handle-schmandle My theory just comes from listening to all the different record pressings over the years where I can distinctly hear both versions. I’m not sure if you were trying to say the Anthology version reverted back to the original “Paul is Dead.” If that is true. I did not know that.
@@michaelkennedy6415 There have been three different commonly held theories about this for over fifty years, but you had to make up your own? And look how matter of fact your first comment is, as if you’re sharing the actual truth. No offense, but this is exactly why there’s so much bullsh*t in the world.
Paul wrote that song for him. He wants the world to know now he is William not Paul and he s written a book to explain it all memoirs of billy shears , you can not put a song out with all the Beatles songs on without their permission He did die in 66 it’s 100% true
True. He would have been sued for using the Beatle songs without permission. Was there a lawsuit? No, just revamped the record label .
You're crammed hard into that retro corner lol. I'd love to see the wide view of that room
Four More Clues For You All: Here Is More Proof:
Number One, The Beatles went into the studio years cuz Paul's replacement couldn't go around the world not being able to know things, people would expect Paul to know. The man who replaced Paul wouldn't recognize people, remember events etc! Number two, John Lennon and Paul McCartney were best friends, now, their relationship is said to have went south, and most people believe that, but they didn't have a falling out but it was not the same man!
Number three, Jane was asked and agreed for 1 year to go on publicly claiming that she was with Paul's replacement but this is not true, it was not the original Paul McCartney, Jane agreed to stay with him for the public for the media for one year's time.
Number four, Paul's replacement broke union with John, George and Ringo who all choose Phil Spectre to be their new manager, what Paul's replacement chose Linda's father. He was not really one of them, at least not from the start!
He Who Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear! #PaulMcCartney #TheBeatles #TheFabFour #JohnLennon #GeorgeHarrison #RingoStar
Ditto..
Paul sang "Yesterday" w/a string quartet back-up in 1965. Then Paul died. Listen to "Yesterday" in 1966 to hear Faul singing his impersonation of Paul (RIP). Note to Faul: Confess before you're singing "Yesterday" in the lake of fire w/the devil as your back-up screamer. 👿
To answer your question, yes, Paul was aware of the song. However, Terry Knight did not get the kudos. It was New Zealand singer Shane who covered the song only a few months after Terry Knight recorded his version. Shane received a congratulations letter from Paul McCartney as the song did hit the top charts in New Zealand. Though it failed to become a worldwide hit.
William was aware of the song. The song is about the death of Paul.
Biological Paul is dead.
Die 09/11/1966
The individual playing him is Billy Shears.
The clues are out there if one is willing to look. The history beyond the Beatles and biological paul's death is dark.
www.lulu.com/en/us/shop/les-nicholls/the-faul-guy/ebook/product-1gq94g7g.html
The Devil is in the details......
Indeed, Crowley on Pepper cover twice and HELP cover also occult themed
Beatles pre 67 all smiles good feelings. Post 67 sadness and conflict. What happens? Paul reemplaced by Billy.
Brian Epstein's death happened (August 1967). Just imagine if Epstein hadn't died. We probably would have had the Beatles around at least a little bit longer.
Thank you for putting the research together for this topic.
How does one explain away four people within the Beatles circle meeting violent deaths?
The Devil is in the details..
Paul did a show on the marquee of ed sulivan theater recently this was a return to their first big break
In the audio you can hear paul talking to one of the stage hands, that had been there since pauls first appearance in 60s.
He had helped paul with an equipment problem.Any faux paul would never have known about this incident
specially scripted to get you thinking that way - deep fakery in here
That story is not true . That is Faul changing history by making it up as he goes. He has been lying for over 56 years.
So this he can remember, but not that he was a founding Beatle?
William has told us he's the 2nd one in Band on the Run.
Mr. Rewind, may I suggest you do a video on the Love album? If you haven't heard of it, it's a remix of many different songs throughout The Beatles' career done by Giles and George in 2006. It would be really interesting to see what you think about it and to hear what parts you recognise from the originals. Keep it up!
If you hold a mirror up to the "LOVE" on the cover it looks like "CLUE"
One thing that I have noticed is that all the Beatles remained the same,their hair just grew longer. But Paul changed a bit from more happy go lucky to more serious and sarcastic. It looks like a tougher Paul who likes to take charge. But like Socrates I know I know nothing,
William became their new bandleader and as that he was a controlfreak.