Looking to buy a Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-50, or any vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to learn about invoice pricing and get the BEST PRICE on vehicles in your local area!
I'd get the CX-5 because it's built in Japan and has a better rear suspension and a smoother, quieter ride. The CX-50 may be longer and wider, but it's also lower. Not a good thing if you're taller or older.
I did get my 2023 CX5 signature two months ago. I know for certain that the price on it mentioned in this vid is bullshit. The market price for a cx5 signature comes up to 44k
I am tall and old. I have no problem whatsoever with my CX50 resulting from either condition. The torsion bar suspension on the CX50 was originally designed and utilized on tanks. It is noted for having greater reliability than an independent rear suspension. The CX50 is not made in Japan, but is made at a factory that is a collaborative partnership with Toyota. Toyota has been making cars in the U.S. for decades. Same for Honda and Subaru. Any notion that Japanese cars made in the U.S. are inferior is pure myth.
My new 2024 and fourth CX5 is due to arrive any day now. We did test drive CX50 BUT found it to be less slick than the 5. Being our fourth purchase, we know the 5 rides well, is dependable with miminal maintenance costs. Our first CX5, 2015, belongs to our son and is well over 220,000 rough driveb miles. He just took ownership of the 2021 model. Our daughter has the 2017. We love the CX5!❤❤❤
I have a ‘21 Touring CX-5, non-preferred , in Deep Crystal Blue Mica and I’ve owned it since new. Been a very dependable and fun vehicle to drive, even with the base engine. I’d choose it over the CX-50 because I like the independent suspension setup and the fact that it’s made in Japan. Great video!
I just purchased a 2024 CX-50 Turbo Premium after seeing it parked next to a CX-5 at the dealership. The CX- 50 just looked way better. The description my wife used was athletic. Concerning the headroom and middle seat seam issue as mentioned by some reviewers: I am 6’ 6” and there is absolutely no problem with head room. Also, I just got back from a 800 mile tour into the mountains of Tennessee and NC and the middle seam on seats is a definite non issue for me. The CX-50 ran flawlessly, and I am extremely happy with my purchase.
I'm also 6'6" and have no problem fitting into my 2024 CX-50 Turbo Premium. Everything about this Mazda was extremely well thought out and it's a blast to drive. I have the Zircon Sand with Terracotta and get compliments all the time. Very pleased with my purchase as well.
Wonderful review! I've had 18 years good service out of my 2006 Mazda Tribute & am getting ready for a new vehicle. Now I understand the differences between the CX-5 and CX-50. It will be the CX-5 for me...I appreciate the higher driving position.
Nothing beats the side profile of the CX5. Most cars just look awkward from the side. I think the CX5 still looks better than most new car designs which often feel outdated a few years later
I test drove both in Feb 24. I couldn’t get past the discomfort of the seats on the 50. The 5’s seats were infinitely more comfortable to me, and that’s the model that I took home. Nothing else about the car matters to me if the sets aren’t comfortable.
I just traded my cx30 for a cx5 after test driving the cx50 I found myself having to raise the seat height passed my liking while in the cx5 it felt a more relax driving position with a lower seat height it made it more comfortable for me . But the cx50 looks great
Test drove both yesterday - I wish they used the same suspension on the CX-50 - it just doesn’t drive as nice. The pick up on the CX-5 is also noticeably better. The interior is also more comfortable on the 5, but does feel dated compared to the 50 with the pano sunroof. Reliability wise, having owned a 5 and a 9, I lean towards the 5 being produced in Japan and having a longer track record.
Bought a CX-5 Turbo in May of this year and have loved it! I drove German cars for the previous 5 years or so, and they can't hold a candle to the quality and build of the CX-5. Premium feeling, excellent drive even at high elevation (I'm in SLC), and amazing features for the price (like cooled seats, premium sound system, etc.). After hundreds of hours of research, it's where I landed and couldn't be happier. Best car under $40k hands down.
@@sinpinsYeah it's not the best, but not the worst. With the Turbo and premium fuel, I average around 21 in the city (lots of stop and go) and 29-30 on the highway.
Honestly I think the CX-50 has more potential. Young adults prefer versatility. Whether it’s a drive in the city, or riding the back roads for a camping trip. The design of the CX-50 is both classy and rugged. It’s a good balance. Also younger buyers love longevity. They want to buy a car, and keep it for 10-15+ years that will last and handle all circumstances. CX-50 will definitely be an upcoming model that will compete with Toyota and Honda.
Both are great! I had a Cx 5 GT turbo for 4 years. It’s a great car. We just got a cx-50 GT fully loaded and man... It is awesome. Larger backseats, bigger trunk( cx-5 is deeper) . The 2014 model had a suspension upgrade. It’s a bit less bumpy than the cx-5 in the city( my wife loved). The only cons about the cx-50 . The Apple car and dashboard are pretty buggy. Wireless charging doesn’t work properly sometimes . In the other hand, the cx5 is more stable but more laggy. Overall are great cars with good drive handling.
Exact same case for us - 2020 GT Turbo CX-5 to fully loaded 2024 GT Turbo CX-50. I definitely prefer the CX-50 in all aspects except I find the build quality not as good (one door lock is a bit noisy, doors don't sound as good when closing, steering wheel feels slightly cheaper). Looking at it and driving it I prefer the CX-50 by far. During the 4 years we had the CX-5 we had not ONE issue. Never opened the hood on it once except to refill wiper fluid.
While I like the rugged look and pano sunroof of the CX-50, I'd have to take the CX-5. I love the 40/20/40 split rear seat and the more luxury feel of the interior and the smoother ride.
I purchased a 2023 CX-5 Carbon edition to eventually to give to my son in a few months and get myself a more premium vehicle or an EV. I am beginning to have second thoughts now-- because I want to keep the CX-5. Absolutely love the packaging, looks, and cabin feel. It is nicely buttoned down-- transmission works well with the naturally aspirated 2.5L I4. Power is more than adequate for our purposes.
I will probably be downvoted, but EVs are ugh. As much as I want to say the "green" movement was right, it hasn't offered much availability in long car rides. Literally can gas up a car in less than 5 mins. For EVs, I have heard the fastest recharge rate is around 10 mins, which is "fine" if you don't mind waiting. On top of that, sourcing parts for a lithium battery is a nightmare. My current car is a plugin hybrid, had to wait 8 months on a replacement battery, which is unacceptable. That service center said two of their clients have been waiting a year and a half on their EV batteries. If you do go with something that is more "green" movement friendly, i would recommend a regular hybrid car. But this is all my personal experiences, I am sure other people will say they are great and life changing, but EVs are still fairly new except for Tesla. Tesla's have been having issues left and right with their cars in terms of longevity.
No matter which one you choose they drive so nice. Both have a rougher ride than some competitors but changed my tires on my cx50 after 28k and much softer ride now. Main deciding factor for me going with the cx50 was simply more comfortable for me. Arm rest on the cx5 is small and really do not like the location of cup holders. Trunk has more usable space due to its shape. Again, very personal though.
I test drove both of them last week. Overall, I thought the cx 5 was far much better(ride quality, cabin noise, etc) I already own a '21 cx 5, and i was considering buying a cx 50. After driving both, I'll just keep my cx 5 and wait for the cx 60.
Have owned 2 cx5 now driving a cx50. One reason for cx50 was tired of seeing so many cx5 hehehe now I hardly see anything like my cx50. I also feel the drive is somewhat better in cx50 as not as much hop in the rear going around a corner and hitting a bump (for example). Enjoy your reviews keep up the great work.
@@mp8129test drove both today, went to only look at the 5, the guy mentioned the 50 so we drove it, loved them both but seemed the 50 just felt better, and the 5 is smaller (I don’t want a car) that’s why I think I prefer the 50, I wonder how much it matters that it is made in the US, get yours yet? Like it? Love it?
@@guitarplayer4429 I’m still waiting for my, I want the crazy red with black leather, and the turbo premium plus so I have to wait a little longer, it says in transit, should be before December 2nd. Other dealers have turbo plus or different colors but I want this specific one. My daughter was waiting for her rav4 over a month (I like it too but I like better the CX50-50TPP;). So, I’m patient;) I’ll be switching from Toyota sequoia, so maybe that’s why I like the cx-50 better, it’s stronger than RAV4.
Just got the 2024 Cx5 Preferred..even though its on the lower trim, IT IS AMAZING to drive. Plus it looks classy since the 2024s have a 1 body color for the entire thing
I’m sorry, don’t get it, how are The cup holders being further away from the driver a better system? This means the driver has to reach further while driving in the cx50?
I bought the CX-5 in black but I wanted the chrome blacked out. So while the dealer was doing that, I got a CX-50 as a loaner. I like the way they look but aside from that, I prefer mine.
We are not getting the CX-50 in my country, not for a few years anyway. I got a top spec silver turbo CX-5 a few months ago. Very nice car and a treat to drive.
Drive the CX5 two days ago, the first vehicle ran on 87 octane the second CX5 ran on 91 octane, what a difference in hp. The get up and go was something else. CX5 over CX 50 is my choice. Good job guys 👍.
Currently shopping for a '25 CX-5 non-turbo, as I believe the turbo would be a waste of money due to poorer fuel economy PLUS the need to run 93 octane in order to take advantage of the turbo. That and the fact we're already sitting on a relatively large 2.5L power plant, I struggle to see the point; this coming from a sluggish driver to begin with.😊
I am curious as to whats under the plastic cladding of the cx-50 is it metal? over the long term I am worried about rust, and if its covered in plastic you wont see it
CX 5 is my choice. The fact that MAZDA got rid of the plastic trim around the wheels alone was enough for me. Besides the price difference is not worth choosing the CX 50 in my opinion.
They need to do the road/sound test on the exact same stretch of road and at around 75 miles an hour. I understand that it's not always possible, but the type of road surface significantly impacts results. Still a good test and I'm glad they do try and take it into consideration when most reviewers skip of this part. And everyone who's owned a car for a longer duration knows that road/wind noise can really be a deal breaker.
We just traded in a 21 Signature CX-5 for the 24 GT (Signature equivalent) So much roomier, far better stereo, bigger screen, nicer seats and a bunch of features the cx-5 was lacking. Now it feels perfect.
Can any of you explain me how is possible that people pay more for a USA assemble instead Japanese, more for a torsion beam suspension instead a multilink, more for twin scroll turbo instead a dynamic pressure turbo?
I drove a cx-50 a few weeks ago (too trim) and was shocked by the amount of tire noise, engine harshness and firm ride. Major disappointment. Am I crazy? Is the cx-5 significantly better?
From what I’m hearing since the Cx5 is built in Japan they have different qc standards. We rented a Cx5 when we went to Illinois and loved it. Just too small for our family.
@cameronkennedy5056 we are family of 4 but kids are older with one in uni. We don't need room for strollers and equipment anymore. It's the perfect size for us now.
Compliments to the Great video very well done great explection on both. I Have a 2018 Mazda Cx5 GT Pearl White. I would still choose a Cx5 It nice to see to brothers make car video!!! Keep up the great job zoom zoom😊😉👍💪💪
I came from a CX9 and downsized to a CX-50. From my perspective, I couldn't deal with the short stubby armrest on the CX5, especially for a long drive. The longer arm rest with the cup holders positioned more forward in the cabin makes the CX50 a far more comfortable ride, even with the firmer seating. You sacrifice some height in the cargo area, but gain it in usable length. Only 7" shorter than the larger CX9 with all seats folded down.
Good video! I wish you would have used different metrics for rear leg room and rear cargo area. Mazda's measurements should make the CX-5's rear seats one of the roomiest in the segment, but the reality is that CX-5 has some of the least roomy back seats. I'm not sure how they measured it, but it can't be right. We have two CX-5s in the household, one of which replaced an older CX-5, but all are the current generation. It's immediately apparent when you get into the back of the CX-50 that its back seats have more legroom. The cargo area measurements are also questionable when it comes to usability. The CX-5 has more cargo space on paper because of its higher roof, which is great if you stack cargo all the way up to the ceiling. But CX-50 has a large advantage in length of the cargo area, which most people would find more usable. I don’t know how many times I've had to fold the CX-5's rear seats down because I needed an extra 4-5 inches of space, which wouldn't be necessary in the CX-50.
Thanks, looking to buy a new SUV in the spring. Love Mazda having driven them in the 80s. Looking at different vehicles. Thanks just subscribed to your channel
We have a 2016.5 model of the CX5 and have loved it. I bought it for my wife and both of us have never been happier with the purchase. From what I have read the new models are just as reliable as the one we have. That is something to also consider when buying a new car. My almost eight year old Mazda has had absolutely no issues, at all, during the time we have owner her. My only major complaint with the CX5 was the relative lack of power compared to V6 SUVs in the same category. The Turbo model seems to fix that and it may be as quick as my 2019 GLI now. If it was a vehicle for me I'd probably go with the CX50 but for my wife I am guessing the ride will be a bit better on bigger wheels and the overall setup of the CX5 will be better. The nice thing is that it probably won't be a real step down. We are planning to replace ol faithful next year. The CX5 is right at the top now and I haven't seen a vehicle yet that would replace it.
Currently driving a CX-3. I think the CX-5 would be more my type of ride. Especially since my other rides are a Jguar XK8 and BMW Z3. Unfortunately, I now need an SUV, but noy willing to give up handling. CarGuy John
Good comparison, but i would prefer to compare the absolute base cheapest configurations of both as i don't want a sun roof, don't need the latest/most nanny state bells and whistles, don't care about towing, and if i cared about speed, I'd get a sports car or sports sedan. Otherwise again, great comparison.
Nice review. I would not given .5 to CX-5 for larger cargo space. Technically it is larger but only due to height which is most usually not helpful. I prefer the wider and more practical width of the CX-50 cargo space. And grading the spare tire access as a point of contention seems excessive... Other words, I think it would be a tie. At least by your comparisons. I would add origin country. CX-5 is MIJ meanwhile CX-50 is MIA (albeit with a Toyota partnership). That gives CX-5 at least 1 point higher than CX-50.
My choice is the CX5 which is what I currently drive. I do not like the looks of the CX50 and without an independent rear suspension it would be a deal breaker. It's too bad Mazda did not make the CX5 the size of the CX50.
I love my 2023 CX 5 Carbon Edition. I think it looks classier than the CX 50 and has a timeless look to it and its still built in Japan which like. My only regret is not getting the turbo version but I couldnt justify the 6k price premium for a turbo engine.
I prefer the look of the cx 50 plastic trim but as a 9 year owner of cx5, my trim faded right away and has been a problem with keeping it looking new despite multiple detailing treatments. I'd rather not go through that again with even more plastic on the 50! so not sure which to buy! My 2016 CX5 Grand Touring (top model) has been a great car. I'm probably going to stay Mazda but I feel like I'll get bored staying in the same model for 18 years, so I'm looking at the CX50 which I like the looks of better. Test drove the new 70 and the only good one was the plug-in hybrid, the other 2 engines were slow. The Turbo edition of the 50 was good but way worse gas mileage. The supposedly standard roof rack was crazy loud!!!! Even the dealer didn't know what was causing so much noise!
Theres Mzada testing the waters before reintroduction of Mazda 5. This models design was way advanced fir its time and was Mazdas one proud model. I enjoy the 3 unlock press to lower all the windows hidden feature..✌️
I don’t understand why Mazda made two different models of this similar styled SUV. They could have easily incorporated the looks by adding more features to differentiate the two, similar to what other brands do.
Yeah, it seems like CX-50 could have been a "trim" instead of a model, if they weren't built on different platforms. But surely they could have put different grilles and fenders (or even just different fender cladding), wheels and possibly some suspension tweaks, then a couple other features on the interior to make something more "rugged".
Why is the predicted lifespan of CX-50 80,000 where CX-5 is 200,000-250,000? Is it really that much of a difference in quality or is there just not enough data on the CX-50 for it to make a good estimate. I really like the CX-50, but is the Japan built CX-5 the reason for the much larger number?
Some people are COMPARING these as though they are "siblings"-- but they're NOT-- the cx-5 is one frame and the cx-50 is based on the same frame as the CX-30... so DIFFERENT..
We just tried the 30,5 and the 50 for our boy a college vehicle. For us it really wasn’t even close. The Cx-5 won hands down, so that’s what we bought.
We tried both we liked the 5 because it felt like you were sitting up in it compared to the 50 feeling of sitting down in it just our opinion Both are beautiful cars overall
The one aspect that killed the cx-50 for me. At highway speeds, the noise was CONSIDERABLY louder than the cx-5. That is fatiguing on long drives. The cx-5 is a better daily (road) driver experience, by far. the cx-50 OTOH, is better offroad and much more refined than the competition.
Thank you. We have a half mile gravel driveway with an incline, so the 50 felt like the best. My suburu had transmission problems, and I hate to lose it, but there it is.
Can you just tell me what style and model of sunglasses your brother who holds the sound device has on LOL I like those. Really good. As for CX5 vs CX50 I find they both have their pros and cons. I can't decide to be honest. Personally I think they are BOTH behind the curve when it comes to MPG. They should have had a CX-5 hybrid and a CX-50 hybrid by now with MPG of at least 35 t 40 mpg to compete with Toyota Rav4 Hybrid and Honda CRV Hybrid.
In your scoring you need to add one big category. The CX 50 is made in a new plant with workers with little experience. The CX 5 however in 100% made in Japan in a state of the are plant filled with highly experienced Japanese workers. Should add five points to CX5
The downfall is the CX50 turbo has awful annoying stop/start and now the base engine 24 CX5 has it. At least it’s not across the board. Build quality will always b better in Japan.
A point or half--a-point because you have to puish on button on the exterior of the door handle is bogus. I fact, would argue the baack-handle sensor could be a hindrance if the fobs have been programmed to different drivers and the 'other' driver simply wants to open an unlocked door. Picayune, for sure but so is ranking the vurtue of a rear sensor versus a front button. And, a panoramic sunroof is not an advantage in all areas of the country nor all seasons.
the cx-5 is made in japan while the cx-50 is made in the USA well I should say assembled, also it doesnt make sense that the cx-50 is more expensive in all trims, since the cx-5 has to be loaded on a ship and shipped to the USA while the cx-50 is made in the usa
I forgot to add I feel it took a little longer to feel comfortable driving the cx50 the steering felt different somehow..also do you guys think lesser models would change your mind on which was better?
I'm updating from a 2018 Mazda 3 GT, and the CX-50 wins hands down for me because it feels like my 3. I also haul my bike, kayak, and dog instead of a wife and kids. The lower height and protection of the plastic matter to me. Plus, everyone has a CX-5, and I'd like to stand out from the crowd.
Can you push the rear seats back for more leg room? I have only drove sedans (camry and sonata) but want to get a SUV to ride higher. But that backseat looks cramped on both models!!
It really isn’t IMO. I recently drove both, setting the front seat for me (6’2”) and had no issue with legroom in either. However the 50 was closer on headroom.
Looking to buy a Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-50, or any vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to learn about invoice pricing and get the BEST PRICE on vehicles in your local area!
I'd get the CX-5 because it's built in Japan and has a better rear suspension and a smoother, quieter ride. The CX-50 may be longer and wider, but it's also lower. Not a good thing if you're taller or older.
agreed i noticed that low drop at 6 foot 3. Im not sure i like being that low to the ground in the cx50. less headroom too
CX50 has more ground clearance. Just a lower roof line intended to easily access things you might put up on roof racks
@@ojdtube which means less vertical room for the occupants unfortunately
I did get my 2023 CX5 signature two months ago.
I know for certain that the price on it mentioned in this vid is bullshit.
The market price for a cx5 signature comes up to 44k
I am tall and old. I have no problem whatsoever with my CX50 resulting from either condition. The torsion bar suspension on the CX50 was originally designed and utilized on tanks. It is noted for having greater reliability than an independent rear suspension. The CX50 is not made in Japan, but is made at a factory that is a collaborative partnership with Toyota. Toyota has been making cars in the U.S. for decades. Same for Honda and Subaru. Any notion that Japanese cars made in the U.S. are inferior is pure myth.
My new 2024 and fourth CX5 is due to arrive any day now. We did test drive CX50 BUT found it to be less slick than the 5. Being our fourth purchase, we know the 5 rides well, is dependable with miminal maintenance costs. Our first CX5, 2015, belongs to our son and is well over 220,000 rough driveb miles. He just took ownership of the 2021 model. Our daughter has the 2017. We love the CX5!❤❤❤
what do you special order them? why it take so long? I just go to a dealer and buy a car
@@blakespower 10:03
I have a ‘21 Touring CX-5, non-preferred , in Deep Crystal Blue Mica and I’ve owned it since new. Been a very dependable and fun vehicle to drive, even with the base engine.
I’d choose it over the CX-50 because I like the independent suspension setup and the fact that it’s made in Japan.
Great video!
I just purchased a 2024 CX-50 Turbo Premium after seeing it parked next to a CX-5 at the dealership. The CX- 50 just
looked way better. The description my wife used was athletic.
Concerning the headroom and middle seat seam issue as mentioned by some reviewers:
I am 6’ 6” and there is absolutely no problem with head room. Also, I just got back from a 800 mile tour into the mountains of Tennessee and NC and the middle seam on seats is a definite non issue for me.
The CX-50 ran flawlessly, and I am extremely happy with my purchase.
I'm also 6'6" and have no problem fitting into my 2024 CX-50 Turbo Premium.
Everything about this Mazda was extremely well thought out and it's a blast to drive.
I have the Zircon Sand with Terracotta and get compliments all the time.
Very pleased with my purchase as well.
Bought a Mazda CX-5 11 months ago 2,5 S Base . Very happy with my mazda ❤. Thanks for reviewing guys.
Wonderful review! I've had 18 years good service out of my 2006 Mazda Tribute & am getting ready for a new vehicle. Now I understand the differences between the CX-5 and CX-50. It will be the CX-5 for me...I appreciate the higher driving position.
Glad it was helpful!
Nothing beats the side profile of the CX5. Most cars just look awkward from the side. I think the CX5 still looks better than most new car designs which often feel outdated a few years later
I don't think So the cx5 looks chopped off to me🤮
Exactly most are going back to the boxy looking and I've been over that design in the late 80s
I wish the CX5 had more space in the second row @@bwaters698
I test drove both in Feb 24. I couldn’t get past the discomfort of the seats on the 50. The 5’s seats were infinitely more comfortable to me, and that’s the model that I took home. Nothing else about the car matters to me if the sets aren’t comfortable.
I just traded my cx30 for a cx5 after test driving the cx50 I found myself having to raise the seat height passed my liking while in the cx5 it felt a more relax driving position with a lower seat height it made it more comfortable for me . But the cx50 looks great
If the CX 50 was taller, I would most definitely get it!
Test drove both yesterday - I wish they used the same suspension on the CX-50 - it just doesn’t drive as nice. The pick up on the CX-5 is also noticeably better. The interior is also more comfortable on the 5, but does feel dated compared to the 50 with the pano sunroof. Reliability wise, having owned a 5 and a 9, I lean towards the 5 being produced in Japan and having a longer track record.
Bought a CX-5 Turbo in May of this year and have loved it! I drove German cars for the previous 5 years or so, and they can't hold a candle to the quality and build of the CX-5. Premium feeling, excellent drive even at high elevation (I'm in SLC), and amazing features for the price (like cooled seats, premium sound system, etc.). After hundreds of hours of research, it's where I landed and couldn't be happier. Best car under $40k hands down.
Would you please tell us about fuel consumption and mpg?
check FUELLY its around 25mpg@@sinpins
@@sinpinsYeah it's not the best, but not the worst. With the Turbo and premium fuel, I average around 21 in the city (lots of stop and go) and 29-30 on the highway.
Awesome comparison guys. Was really hard to find a video that broke it down like this!! Loved your format.
Thanks! Glad you found it helpful!
Honestly I think the CX-50 has more potential. Young adults prefer versatility. Whether it’s a drive in the city, or riding the back roads for a camping trip. The design of the CX-50 is both classy and rugged. It’s a good balance. Also younger buyers love longevity. They want to buy a car, and keep it for 10-15+ years that will last and handle all circumstances. CX-50 will definitely be an upcoming model that will compete with Toyota and Honda.
Both are great! I had a Cx 5 GT turbo for 4 years. It’s a great car. We just got a cx-50 GT fully loaded and man... It is awesome. Larger backseats, bigger trunk( cx-5 is deeper) . The 2014 model had a suspension upgrade. It’s a bit less bumpy than the cx-5 in the city( my wife loved). The only cons about the cx-50 . The Apple car and dashboard are pretty buggy. Wireless charging doesn’t work properly sometimes . In the other hand, the cx5 is more stable but more laggy. Overall are great cars with good drive handling.
Exact same case for us - 2020 GT Turbo CX-5 to fully loaded 2024 GT Turbo CX-50. I definitely prefer the CX-50 in all aspects except I find the build quality not as good (one door lock is a bit noisy, doors don't sound as good when closing, steering wheel feels slightly cheaper). Looking at it and driving it I prefer the CX-50 by far. During the 4 years we had the CX-5 we had not ONE issue. Never opened the hood on it once except to refill wiper fluid.
While I like the rugged look and pano sunroof of the CX-50, I'd have to take the CX-5. I love the 40/20/40 split rear seat and the more luxury feel of the interior and the smoother ride.
I purchased a 2023 CX-5 Carbon edition to eventually to give to my son in a few months and get myself a more premium vehicle or an EV. I am beginning to have second thoughts now-- because I want to keep the CX-5. Absolutely love the packaging, looks, and cabin feel. It is nicely buttoned down-- transmission works well with the naturally aspirated 2.5L I4. Power is more than adequate for our purposes.
Tesla has been cutting prices like crazy might be cheaper than the Mazda in a few months with that tax credit
keep it and lease a Tesla to drive around town...The lease is dirt cheap on the Model 3.
I will probably be downvoted, but EVs are ugh. As much as I want to say the "green" movement was right, it hasn't offered much availability in long car rides. Literally can gas up a car in less than 5 mins. For EVs, I have heard the fastest recharge rate is around 10 mins, which is "fine" if you don't mind waiting. On top of that, sourcing parts for a lithium battery is a nightmare. My current car is a plugin hybrid, had to wait 8 months on a replacement battery, which is unacceptable. That service center said two of their clients have been waiting a year and a half on their EV batteries. If you do go with something that is more "green" movement friendly, i would recommend a regular hybrid car. But this is all my personal experiences, I am sure other people will say they are great and life changing, but EVs are still fairly new except for Tesla. Tesla's have been having issues left and right with their cars in terms of longevity.
Lease a Subaru Solettera. Not too much horsepower like the cx5. And it’s super cheap, with premium features.
We went with the CX-50 and love it! Looks amazing and love the drive.
I like the cx50 but I'm going to have to go for the CX-5
I test drove both, CX5 is the winner
CX50 is just beautiful. CX5 is also cool. But I love more the unique and lagid look of 50. Anyway, thank you very much for the review!
No matter which one you choose they drive so nice. Both have a rougher ride than some competitors but changed my tires on my cx50 after 28k and much softer ride now. Main deciding factor for me going with the cx50 was simply more comfortable for me. Arm rest on the cx5 is small and really do not like the location of cup holders. Trunk has more usable space due to its shape. Again, very personal though.
What tires did you get?
I test drove both of them last week. Overall, I thought the cx 5 was far much better(ride quality, cabin noise, etc)
I already own a '21 cx 5, and i was considering buying a cx 50. After driving both, I'll just keep my cx 5 and wait for the cx 60.
CX-90 is too big. And the transmission appears to be clunky in the first two gears. CX-60 might hit the sweet spot.
@@pbflorance8277i think US market will get the cx-70. I am wondering if it just a cx-60 rename but I agree that cx-90 is too big for a small family
@@jeffs6090 thats is a perfect one tho. I am waiting for it too. I am not really into the I6 since my dream car is a M340i
agreed to big@@pbflorance8277
Have owned 2 cx5 now driving a cx50. One reason for cx50 was tired of seeing so many cx5 hehehe now I hardly see anything like my cx50. I also feel the drive is somewhat better in cx50 as not as much hop in the rear going around a corner and hitting a bump (for example). Enjoy your reviews keep up the great work.
Thank you!
Did test drive at both, waiting for cx50 turbo premium plus! Hopefully it will come before Thanksgiving.
@@mp8129test drove both today, went to only look at the 5, the guy mentioned the 50 so we drove it, loved them both but seemed the 50 just felt better, and the 5 is smaller (I don’t want a car) that’s why I think I prefer the 50, I wonder how much it matters that it is made in the US, get yours yet? Like it? Love it?
@@guitarplayer4429 I’m still waiting for my, I want the crazy red with black leather, and the turbo premium plus so I have to wait a little longer, it says in transit, should be before December 2nd.
Other dealers have turbo plus or different colors but I want this specific one.
My daughter was waiting for her rav4 over a month (I like it too but I like better the CX50-50TPP;). So, I’m patient;)
I’ll be switching from Toyota sequoia, so maybe that’s why I like the cx-50 better, it’s stronger than RAV4.
@@mp8129 yah rav 4 is 3 cylinder, WOW to my shock I only found out they even make those last week.
Just got the 2024 Cx5 Preferred..even though its on the lower trim, IT IS AMAZING to drive. Plus it looks classy since the 2024s have a 1 body color for the entire thing
I’m sorry, don’t get it, how are The cup holders being further away from the driver a better system? This means the driver has to reach further while driving in the cx50?
I bought a 23 cx-5 turbo. I looked at th 50. I just couldn't get around the plastic surroundings it. I don't regret my purchase
I bought the CX-5 in black but I wanted the chrome blacked out. So while the dealer was doing that, I got a CX-50 as a loaner. I like the way they look but aside from that, I prefer mine.
My thing too. I like the rugged look and the sunroof but it doesn't feel as good as the CX 5 to drive.
We are not getting the CX-50 in my country, not for a few years anyway. I got a top spec silver turbo CX-5 a few months ago. Very nice car and a treat to drive.
Fantastic comparison as always! They’re both very good cars, but the CX-5 just looks so much better to me!🎃
Drive the CX5 two days ago, the first vehicle ran on 87 octane the second CX5 ran on 91 octane, what a difference in hp. The get up and go was something else. CX5 over CX 50 is my choice. Good job guys 👍.
In Order to get maximum output on the Turbo engine Mazda recommends 93 octane
I like both, I have the CX-5, it's really great, but I would love to have a CX-50 too.
Excellent job guys!!
Currently shopping for a '25 CX-5 non-turbo, as I believe the turbo would be a waste of money due to poorer fuel economy PLUS the need to run 93 octane in order to take advantage of the turbo. That and the fact we're already sitting on a relatively large 2.5L power plant, I struggle to see the point; this coming from a sluggish driver to begin with.😊
I am curious as to whats under the plastic cladding of the cx-50 is it metal? over the long term I am worried about rust, and if its covered in plastic you wont see it
CX 5 is my choice. The fact that MAZDA got rid of the plastic trim around the wheels alone was enough for me. Besides the price difference is not worth choosing the CX 50 in my opinion.
I got a cx5 turbo sand color , with the $ 3000 difference I can make it sportier than the cx50, good work guys.
They need to do the road/sound test on the exact same stretch of road and at around 75 miles an hour. I understand that it's not always possible, but the type of road surface significantly impacts results. Still a good test and I'm glad they do try and take it into consideration when most reviewers skip of this part. And everyone who's owned a car for a longer duration knows that road/wind noise can really be a deal breaker.
were you able to do that test on your own ho figure out the difference?
We just traded in a 21 Signature CX-5 for the 24 GT (Signature equivalent) So much roomier, far better stereo, bigger screen, nicer seats and a bunch of features the cx-5 was lacking. Now it feels perfect.
So you stayed loyal to the CX5?
Can any of you explain me how is possible that people pay more for a USA assemble instead Japanese, more for a torsion beam suspension instead a multilink, more for twin scroll turbo instead a dynamic pressure turbo?
I drove a cx-50 a few weeks ago (too trim) and was shocked by the amount of tire noise, engine harshness and firm ride. Major disappointment. Am I crazy? Is the cx-5 significantly better?
I thought I would love the cx50 more but it is so much less refined . Just bought a 24 cx5 signature
From what I’m hearing since the Cx5 is built in Japan they have different qc standards. We rented a Cx5 when we went to Illinois and loved it. Just too small for our family.
@cameronkennedy5056 we are family of 4 but kids are older with one in uni. We don't need room for strollers and equipment anymore. It's the perfect size for us now.
Compliments to the Great video very well done great explection on both. I Have a 2018 Mazda Cx5 GT Pearl White. I would still choose a Cx5 It nice to see to brothers make car video!!! Keep up the great job zoom zoom😊😉👍💪💪
Thanks!
It's a great pleasure 😉👍
I came from a CX9 and downsized to a CX-50. From my perspective, I couldn't deal with the short stubby armrest on the CX5, especially for a long drive. The longer arm rest with the cup holders positioned more forward in the cabin makes the CX50 a far more comfortable ride, even with the firmer seating.
You sacrifice some height in the cargo area, but gain it in usable length. Only 7" shorter than the larger CX9 with all seats folded down.
The CX5 is great...The armrest is REALLY an issue.....I dont understand why they didnt make it better
that’s funny. being a lefty, i didnt even notice the arm rest issue. i always rest my arm on the center console.
Good video! I wish you would have used different metrics for rear leg room and rear cargo area. Mazda's measurements should make the CX-5's rear seats one of the roomiest in the segment, but the reality is that CX-5 has some of the least roomy back seats. I'm not sure how they measured it, but it can't be right. We have two CX-5s in the household, one of which replaced an older CX-5, but all are the current generation. It's immediately apparent when you get into the back of the CX-50 that its back seats have more legroom. The cargo area measurements are also questionable when it comes to usability. The CX-5 has more cargo space on paper because of its higher roof, which is great if you stack cargo all the way up to the ceiling. But CX-50 has a large advantage in length of the cargo area, which most people would find more usable. I don’t know how many times I've had to fold the CX-5's rear seats down because I needed an extra 4-5 inches of space, which wouldn't be necessary in the CX-50.
Thanks, looking to buy a new SUV in the spring. Love Mazda having driven them in the 80s. Looking at different vehicles. Thanks just subscribed to your channel
We have a 2016.5 model of the CX5 and have loved it. I bought it for my wife and both of us have never been happier with the purchase. From what I have read the new models are just as reliable as the one we have. That is something to also consider when buying a new car. My almost eight year old Mazda has had absolutely no issues, at all, during the time we have owner her.
My only major complaint with the CX5 was the relative lack of power compared to V6 SUVs in the same category. The Turbo model seems to fix that and it may be as quick as my 2019 GLI now. If it was a vehicle for me I'd probably go with the CX50 but for my wife I am guessing the ride will be a bit better on bigger wheels and the overall setup of the CX5 will be better. The nice thing is that it probably won't be a real step down.
We are planning to replace ol faithful next year. The CX5 is right at the top now and I haven't seen a vehicle yet that would replace it.
Cx50 just has the better steering and overall feel when driving. Also the design is really solid and doesn't look like a soccer mom drives it
I own the 2024 Mazda turbo premium and love the smooth ride and handling ease.I'm absolutely smitten by it!
Great comparison video 👍👌
Thank you for all the info and reviews, we really appreciate all the data you provide. Can you please share which vehicle are you in in minute 18?
The CX50 looks amazing!!! I’m planning on looking at one soon
Currently driving a CX-3. I think the CX-5 would be more my type of ride. Especially since my other rides are a Jguar XK8 and BMW Z3. Unfortunately, I now need an SUV, but noy willing to give up handling. CarGuy John
Good comparison, but i would prefer to compare the absolute base cheapest configurations of both as i don't want a sun roof, don't need the latest/most nanny state bells and whistles, don't care about towing, and if i cared about speed, I'd get a sports car or sports sedan. Otherwise again, great comparison.
Nice review. I would not given .5 to CX-5 for larger cargo space. Technically it is larger but only due to height which is most usually not helpful. I prefer the wider and more practical width of the CX-50 cargo space.
And grading the spare tire access as a point of contention seems excessive...
Other words, I think it would be a tie. At least by your comparisons.
I would add origin country. CX-5 is MIJ meanwhile CX-50 is MIA (albeit with a Toyota partnership). That gives CX-5 at least 1 point higher than CX-50.
Mazda CX-5 for me!
I really don't care about the CX50 I'm not into that off road BS. CX5 signature all the way ❤
Thumbs up for the "off road BS" comment. Just a fad that will pass. 99.9% of SUVs of any brand never leave pavement.
Except that the CX50 looks way better. CX5 design is old
@@andrewthach1989 Ok but there's a ALL NEW 2025 CX5 by the end of next summer
I guess road test them both 😢
@@edranft4071drove both today, the guy said the 50 feels a little better, and I agree. Niyeeeeece
My choice is the CX5 which is what I currently drive. I do not like the looks of the CX50 and without an independent rear suspension it would be a deal breaker. It's too bad Mazda did not make the CX5 the size of the CX50.
I love my 2023 CX 5 Carbon Edition. I think it looks classier than the CX 50 and has a timeless look to it and its still built in Japan which like. My only regret is not getting the turbo version but I couldnt justify the 6k price premium for a turbo engine.
I drove both and found the ride and handling similar. I went with the CX-50 Turbo because I like the design better, and mine comes with a moonroof.
Panoramic moonroof?
Love my CX 50. The drive is beautiful and it has a few more bells and whistles on it that I like. Such a fun car to drive.
I prefer the look of the cx 50 plastic trim but as a 9 year owner of cx5, my trim faded right away and has been a problem with keeping it looking new despite multiple detailing treatments. I'd rather not go through that again with even more plastic on the 50! so not sure which to buy! My 2016 CX5 Grand Touring (top model) has been a great car. I'm probably going to stay Mazda but I feel like I'll get bored staying in the same model for 18 years, so I'm looking at the CX50 which I like the looks of better. Test drove the new 70 and the only good one was the plug-in hybrid, the other 2 engines were slow. The Turbo edition of the 50 was good but way worse gas mileage. The supposedly standard roof rack was crazy loud!!!! Even the dealer didn't know what was causing so much noise!
Theres Mzada testing the waters before reintroduction of Mazda 5. This models design was way advanced fir its time and was Mazdas one proud model. I enjoy the 3 unlock press to lower all the windows hidden feature..✌️
When is the next gen of the CX5 coming? Will it be named CX6 or 7/
I wish the CX-50 was taller and bigger. It also needs softer suspension and smaller wheels. I wish it was truly more off-road focused.
How about CX-90
its no off road vehicl and yes its lower. not good for tall people
You can put 17's on it and higher profile tires if you wanted to. We do when winter comes.
Very solid video.
I don’t understand why Mazda made two different models of this similar styled SUV. They could have easily incorporated the looks by adding more features to differentiate the two, similar to what other brands do.
Yeah, it seems like CX-50 could have been a "trim" instead of a model, if they weren't built on different platforms. But surely they could have put different grilles and fenders (or even just different fender cladding), wheels and possibly some suspension tweaks, then a couple other features on the interior to make something more "rugged".
I’m going from a Hyundai Tucson to Mazda suv really need some ideas to go with
Bought a CX5 2024.Turbo. . Nice car. Built in Japan.
Why is the predicted lifespan of CX-50 80,000 where CX-5 is 200,000-250,000? Is it really that much of a difference in quality or is there just not enough data on the CX-50 for it to make a good estimate. I really like the CX-50, but is the Japan built CX-5 the reason for the much larger number?
Some people are COMPARING these as though they are "siblings"-- but they're NOT-- the cx-5 is one frame and the cx-50 is based on the same frame as the CX-30... so DIFFERENT..
Just bought a cx5, and very pleased with it.
Which one is better for highway driving east cost area meaning rain snow ice heat
We just tried the 30,5 and the 50 for our boy a college vehicle. For us it really wasn’t even close. The Cx-5 won hands down, so that’s what we bought.
Ill take cx5. Built in japan
why does the new cx-5 still have the old steering wheel and the old knobs in the centre rest. ...
Because people like it.
Why are all the evaluations done using the top model rarher than the lower ones. I just bought a 2024 CX-50 for $33,000 OTD.
We tried both we liked the 5 because it felt like you were sitting up in it compared to the 50 feeling of sitting down in it just our opinion
Both are beautiful cars overall
Great Video!!
Thanks!
The one aspect that killed the cx-50 for me. At highway speeds, the noise was CONSIDERABLY louder than the cx-5. That is fatiguing on long drives. The cx-5 is a better daily (road) driver experience, by far. the cx-50 OTOH, is better offroad and much more refined than the competition.
Thank you. We have a half mile gravel driveway with an incline, so the 50 felt like the best. My suburu had transmission problems, and I hate to lose it, but there it is.
Can you just tell me what style and model of sunglasses your brother who holds the sound device has on LOL I like those. Really good. As for CX5 vs CX50 I find they both have their pros and cons. I can't decide to be honest. Personally I think they are BOTH behind the curve when it comes to MPG. They should have had a CX-5 hybrid and a CX-50 hybrid by now with MPG of at least 35 t 40 mpg to compete with Toyota Rav4 Hybrid and Honda CRV Hybrid.
Why the cx50 didn't get rid of that stupid middle line in the seats is a mystery. That was the biggest complaint about the 2023
Because they are idiots and dont listen to consumers. They should have both had hybrids by now in the 2024
We need CX50 in Australia. This is so beautiful, maybe that's why they gave us CX60.
In your scoring you need to add one big category. The CX 50 is made in a new plant with workers with little experience. The CX 5 however in 100% made in Japan in a state of the are plant filled with highly experienced Japanese workers. Should add five points to CX5
The downfall is the CX50 turbo has awful annoying stop/start and now the base engine 24 CX5 has it. At least it’s not across the board. Build quality will always b better in Japan.
A point or half--a-point because you have to puish on button on the exterior of the door handle is bogus. I fact, would argue the baack-handle sensor could be a hindrance if the fobs have been programmed to different drivers and the 'other' driver simply wants to open an unlocked door. Picayune, for sure but so is ranking the vurtue of a rear sensor versus a front button. And, a panoramic sunroof is not an advantage in all areas of the country nor all seasons.
the cx-5 is made in japan while the cx-50 is made in the USA well I should say assembled, also it doesnt make sense that the cx-50 is more expensive in all trims, since the cx-5 has to be loaded on a ship and shipped to the USA while the cx-50 is made in the usa
I own the Mazda, CX, five carbon edition for 2023 and I love it. But I do wish that I had the turbo version of that vehicle.
The extra towing capacity has me leaning toward the CX-50, plus it looks way better IMO anyway.
Do you need premium fuel in either car?
For the full power ratings both of them recommend premium fuel
I forgot to add I feel it took a little longer to feel comfortable driving the cx50 the steering felt different somehow..also do you guys think lesser models would change your mind on which was better?
I'm updating from a 2018 Mazda 3 GT, and the CX-50 wins hands down for me because it feels like my 3. I also haul my bike, kayak, and dog instead of a wife and kids. The lower height and protection of the plastic matter to me. Plus, everyone has a CX-5, and I'd like to stand out from the crowd.
Can you push the rear seats back for more leg room? I have only drove sedans (camry and sonata) but want to get a SUV to ride higher. But that backseat looks cramped on both models!!
It really isn’t IMO. I recently drove both, setting the front seat for me (6’2”) and had no issue with legroom in either. However the 50 was closer on headroom.
@@Quickjob519 thanks. I ended up getting the CX 5 and the legroom isn't bad at all.
Good information. I am close to purchasing one of the 2. Your point system is exactly where I am leaning
Going for CX-5
Which one is built in Japan?
CX-5
dealer says depends on your selection of Trim levels.....so comments
CX-5 for me. Love my 2019 Grand Touring. Zoom-Zoom
CX-50 all day the wider stance, and it’s more capable of doing other things. It’s a no-brainer. It blows the CX five out of the water.
No independent rear suspension, I think.
you guys say cx 50 is better than Rav4 and crv...but still u guys unsure...and recommend outlander or rogue...
Cx-5 all day!
Test drove the CX 5 on a hot day , took awhile to cool down the car. Do any CX 5 or 50 owners have an opinion on this ?