Thanks for explaining Russell's concepts in such simple terms. Alternative concepts can face hostility, but being so simple anyone can consider for themselves. - Another example of simple and observable contraction and expansion cycles are rain-drops, which travel in two opposite directions, compressing into matter, and expanding into gas. - The effects of gravity and weight reverse when planets and rain drops begin to decay back outwards. Cause and effect.
Yes, all things are the One thing disturbed. The disturbance gives us the frequencies, the vibrations, the waves, and its return gives us gravity, electrostatics, Dielectricity.
Just checking if I understood the model explained in the previous video. So there's light everywhere which forms matter when it pulsates to certain frequencies, and emptiness is simply light not pulsating? The part that seems less clear is why it needs sources that emit light in order to follow the gravitational path, if there's already light everywhere. And also I don't get where those sources are. (I guess I'd need to read the books to find out. lol ) In any case pretty intriguing.
The light is everywhere and when it reaches a certain frequency then humans can see it with thier eyes. The emptiness is light pulsating at frequencies too low for the human eye to see...but it is still there.
In Walter Russell's concept the source is like what happened before the "Big Bang". Our physics can't reach that far so I don't talk about it on my channel very much, but he says that source is the mind of God.
No, Gravity is not a thing that is "pushing" "light" inward, and radiation is not a thing that is pushing light outwards. The All thing, the Absolute thing, The One Thing disturbed is an outward motion of force and an inward motion of return to One. All things are One Thing.
I appreciate your comment! You are correct when you say "The one thing disturbed is an outward motion of force and an inward motion of return to One" I chose not to explain it that way because I think it will be too confusing for most people. Even though I know Russell described how "The One Thing" polarizes into two APPARENT forces, I am choosing to talk about the two apparent forces and what those forces do. Let me connect what you said and what I am saying because we are describing the same phenomena just in a different way... ...The OUTWARD motion of force of the one thing disturbed is what Russell called the electric force or the force of gravitation. It gathers light together, integrating it into a mass of a higher potential. It forces light to compress via centripetal spirals into a smaller volume...INWARDS toward the center of gravity of that mass. The one thing disturbed then has the INWARD motion of return to One. This is the reaction to the initial outward motion of the disturbed equilibrium of The One Thing. Russell called this the magnetic force or the force of Radiation. This force disintegrates the high potential mass by causing light to expand via centrifugal spirals to a larger volume...OUTWARDS away from the center of gravity of that mass. This makes the light return to a lower potential back towards the equilibrium of the One where it started from. We are describing the same process. It's just that you are describing the direction of motion relative to the inertial plane of the balanced equilibrium of THE ONE and I am describing the direction of motion relative to the body of mass that is formed. It is just my opinion that how I described it will be a little more accessible to most people who are not yet familiar with Russell's concepts because they know about a body of mass like the sun or earth but they may not know about the concept of the undivided light of THE ONE. I love talking about this...I really appreciate your comments. Thank you! I am curious to know what you think about my response to your comment. What do you think?
I hear you. This is just a teaser video. Future videos will be more in depth. Russell's concept matches observations of nature. Trying to explain his entire theory of everything can't be done in one 18 minute video. I hope you will check back with the channel once we have a few more in depth videos.
Thanks for explaining Russell's concepts in such simple terms. Alternative concepts can face hostility, but being so simple anyone can consider for themselves. - Another example of simple and observable contraction and expansion cycles are rain-drops, which travel in two opposite directions, compressing into matter, and expanding into gas. - The effects of gravity and weight reverse when planets and rain drops begin to decay back outwards. Cause and effect.
Yes, all things are the One thing disturbed. The disturbance gives us the frequencies, the vibrations, the waves, and its return gives us gravity, electrostatics, Dielectricity.
Probably one of the best videos done on Walter Russel, well done sir!
You said in another video you'd post experiments proving Walter Russell's work. Do you still intend on doing that? One of the reasons I am following.
Yes, I'm going through a move to a new house now until July. Once I get my studio set back up I will be able to edit the footage and post a video.
Walter Russell - Proof of Concept - Conical Coils Experimentruclips.net/video/8qeBRvgMKuA/видео.html
This work is very well done, thank you! Keep it rolling brother!
This is great! Can’t wait for the next one
Learn more about Walter & Lao Russell
ruclips.net/user/liveG1hFH-hixFk?si=-HbbBP_mA4h11cip
Great video! Looking forward to more.
Ya'll guys are excited. This might just be the beginning.
Just checking if I understood the model explained in the previous video. So there's light everywhere which forms matter when it pulsates to certain frequencies, and emptiness is simply light not pulsating? The part that seems less clear is why it needs sources that emit light in order to follow the gravitational path, if there's already light everywhere. And also I don't get where those sources are. (I guess I'd need to read the books to find out. lol ) In any case pretty intriguing.
The light is everywhere and when it reaches a certain frequency then humans can see it with thier eyes.
The emptiness is light pulsating at frequencies too low for the human eye to see...but it is still there.
In Walter Russell's concept the source is like what happened before the "Big Bang". Our physics can't reach that far so I don't talk about it on my channel very much, but he says that source is the mind of God.
@@3dfrequency Ok I see. Thanks for the explanation.
No, Gravity is not a thing that is "pushing" "light" inward, and radiation is not a thing that is pushing light outwards. The All thing, the Absolute thing, The One Thing disturbed is an outward motion of force and an inward motion of return to One. All things are One Thing.
I appreciate your comment! You are correct when you say "The one thing disturbed is an outward motion of force and an inward motion of return to One" I chose not to explain it that way because I think it will be too confusing for most people. Even though I know Russell described how "The One Thing" polarizes into two APPARENT forces, I am choosing to talk about the two apparent forces and what those forces do. Let me connect what you said and what I am saying because we are describing the same phenomena just in a different way...
...The OUTWARD motion of force of the one thing disturbed is what Russell called the electric force or the force of gravitation. It gathers light together, integrating it into a mass of a higher potential. It forces light to compress via centripetal spirals into a smaller volume...INWARDS toward the center of gravity of that mass. The one thing disturbed then has the INWARD motion of return to One. This is the reaction to the initial outward motion of the disturbed equilibrium of The One Thing. Russell called this the magnetic force or the force of Radiation. This force disintegrates the high potential mass by causing light to expand via centrifugal spirals to a larger volume...OUTWARDS away from the center of gravity of that mass. This makes the light return to a lower potential back towards the equilibrium of the One where it started from. We are describing the same process. It's just that you are describing the direction of motion relative to the inertial plane of the balanced equilibrium of THE ONE and I am describing the direction of motion relative to the body of mass that is formed. It is just my opinion that how I described it will be a little more accessible to most people who are not yet familiar with Russell's concepts because they know about a body of mass like the sun or earth but they may not know about the concept of the undivided light of THE ONE.
I love talking about this...I really appreciate your comments. Thank you! I am curious to know what you think about my response to your comment. What do you think?
Word play w/o any substance.
I hear you. This is just a teaser video. Future videos will be more in depth. Russell's concept matches observations of nature. Trying to explain his entire theory of everything can't be done in one 18 minute video. I hope you will check back with the channel once we have a few more in depth videos.
@@3dfrequency Thank you. I will look forward to that.
@@3dfrequencyyou said nothing for 18 minutes to tease a future video? nah I'll pass