Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Who are the princes in Daniel 10? (Daniel 10:1-21)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 май 2021
- In this video, we discuss the multiple beings that are in the scene with Daniel. Much confusion over who is who in the scene has led many to believing that Michael (v13,31) is the Glorious Man, ie Jesus. This video will clean up all confusion over who is talking to Daniel and also who are the princes of Persia and Greece.
Click Here to Support:
justscripture.o...
Music provided by No Copyright Music:
/ royaltyfree
Epic Music provided by AShamaluevMusic
Track Info: Epic Motivation - AShamaluevMusic.
Music Link: / ashamaluevmusic
#justscripture #bookofdaniel #defendingthefaith
Indeed the scripture can never contradict itself, it's men who contradict it.
Thanks for watching. Please leave a comment.
U do great work bro. Thanks.
Thank you for the compliment.
I need the follow up to this video. Someone please point me to it.
ruclips.net/video/ACAbTiZGdgU/видео.html
This is the follow up video.
I'm glad you're watching and appears to be enjoying this topic.
God bless.
did you ever make the video: Daniel 11-12, who, what, when?
Have not but kind of as I did do a videos on Daniel 11-12 in Revelation.
ruclips.net/video/uDMFF-mWocc/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/G5gW0OBEeRU/видео.html
I think it was archangel gabriel
Jesus wouldn’t say I am sent to Daniel
why is it the the year of the 4 emperors is not the up rooted horns and vespanian the 11th horn?
I hope you are doing well. My top 3 reasons for not placing it’s fulfillment with Vespasian are the following:
1) Daniel 2 says the 4th Empire would be divided then comes at the very end the 10 toes, Uncut Stone smashes, then Everlasting Kingdom.
- this division of Rome happened officially in 398 AD; so the 10 toes/horns would come after that point.
2) 10 toes/horns are concurrent, not sequential. The imagery of the toes and the description of the horns show them ruling at the same time not as successors to one another. This gets picked up in Rev 17:12 saying that the 10 kings have not received their kingdom yet.
That’s huge because if let’s say John wrote Revelation in ~66 AD is that that statement still undermines the 1st emperors position because John says none of the 10 have come while the preterist view will say typically that the first 7 had already from Augustus to Nero.
I personally believe that John wrote Revelation towards the end of the 1st AD just as FYI.
3) eschatological lack of fulfillment
If the full preterist wants to say that Josephus’ stories of signs in skies around 70 AD was Christ’s coming on clouds, ie the 2nd coming then 3 things need to be addressed:
1) Why did nobody in the Church report on it? We are told abundantly in the NT that His coming will be for everyone to see and witness.
2) Where was the General Resurrection that was said to come after Christ’s return? That’s in both Revelation and 1 Cor 15?
3) Why has Death not been eliminated? Christ’s return is tagged with the transition to the “age to come” with no more death taking place?
I have more reasons against the Vespasian / Titus view but that’s but those are the main reasons why I would argue against full preterism.
Good explanations, but could you please use another type of illustration instead of cartoon characters for Jesus Christ?
Thanks. Those are free images from a Christian site. They had numerous characters and images of objects that have made producing the the slides extremely easier.
I don’t know of site that have real life portrayals that are free to use and come with the ease to manipulate them as needed.
What's the answer to that cliffhanger? :)
That gets answered in the Tower of Babel video. ruclips.net/video/ACAbTiZGdgU/видео.html
@@JustScriptureMinistries hi do you have any video about the false prophet? Who is the false prophet?
@@rfs55 Just on the False Prophet, no. But covered a little on him, yes. Somewhere in one of my church teaching videos on Revelation.
Just had a thought...what if, Jesus was held up becuase He is the Word and if He speaks it will come to pass 🤔..very plausible