REALISTIC Iranian Combined Gunboat, Missile & Drone Swarm vs US Carrier Group (Naval 53) | DCS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 июн 2024
  • 0:00 Overview
    3:17 Details
    10:57 Predictions
    12:38 FIGHT!
    Boghammer Vid 1: • Can An Iranian Gunboat...
    Boghammer Vid 2: • *REMATCH* Can An Irani...
    Drone Vid: • RE-UPLOAD Can A Modern...
    Master Sheet: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    Playlist: • Naval Battles
    SPONSORS
    Winwing: www.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Winwing USA: fox2.wwsimstore.com/STORE
    Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS(RUclips): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2(RUclips): / @grimreapers2
    GRIM REAPERS(Odysee): odysee.com/$/invite/@grimreap...
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DCS OFFICIAL SITE: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
    ONE TO ONE LESSONS: grimreapers.net/one-to-one-le...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    STREAMS(Other Members): grimreapers.net/gr-twitch/
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
    DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
    OTHER
    CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
    CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #DCSQuestioned #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @imgavster66
    @imgavster66 2 года назад +191

    You should do a us carrier group 360 surrounded by silk worms

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +11

      This was similar: ruclips.net/video/FuMTVI65Myg/видео.html

    • @donaldjacks1893
      @donaldjacks1893 2 года назад +1

      @@grimreapers I

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Enjoy the fantasy movie

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      I find this video from Scot Ritter US Marine officer about US iran war.
      watch it you will find how wrong you are!
      tnx

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 2 года назад +97

    I just re watched this operation with my dad who was in the Navy during Vietnam. He's in his last days, but he got a kick out of it by how fast the Iranian speed boats can be and the Carrier operations were impressive CAP! Two Thumbs up from a Vietnam Vet my Dad. The Destroyers turning to hunt and kill brought back a few memories of Carrier Tactics. Well done Reapers!

    • @dankuchar6821
      @dankuchar6821 2 года назад +9

      Thank you to your father for his service!

    • @jboydayz
      @jboydayz Год назад +1

      I hope your father lives for a long as possible, and also thank you for your fathers service.

  • @telesto912
    @telesto912 2 года назад +234

    This was probably the most realistic one yet. The escort ships actually did their job and defended the Carrier. This was exciting watch. It is probably as close as we can get to the real thing. Hearing those CIWS and bushmaster guns going had my heart racing.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +20

      agree

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад +1

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @robertduklus6555
      @robertduklus6555 2 года назад

      you idiots, the tanker was to be seized by the americans. the iranians ensured that it didnt happened.

    • @martinpalmer6203
      @martinpalmer6203 2 года назад +7

      except the Boghammer going all the way through the Burke.,.... IRL if that happened theyd definitely take the burke out of action with a few boats ...suicide bombs or not

    • @override367
      @override367 2 года назад +4

      @@gnarlax2005 it'd be kind of hard to disguise a surprise attack while casually splitting your force into 300 different places

  • @markstott6689
    @markstott6689 2 года назад +76

    That was most excellent Cap. Real tactics made such a difference. Hats off to the programmers for making actual changes. It was so much more realistic. I never thought we would see the day when the carrier got itself out of harms way and the DD/CA screen acted like...well....a real screen. EPIC.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +7

      Yeh will move forward with this model on future vids.

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      I find this video from Scot Ritter US Marine officer about US iran war. watch it you will find how wrong you are! tnx

  • @sekhris
    @sekhris 2 года назад +255

    wouldn't the fleet launch their helos too? The hellfires or APKWS could have caused add'l mayhem. Also, it would be great to see this same scenario against an Amphib Group vs. the carrier fleet. Great stuff...first time commenter. I love your vids, CAP

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +60

      Really good ideas thanks.

    • @urimeltzer197
      @urimeltzer197 2 года назад +31

      there would also be 50 cals on the arleigh burks

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @kenkennedy9589
      @kenkennedy9589 2 года назад +3

      The fleet would still get crammed

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      I find this video from Scot Ritter US Marine officer about US iran war. watch it you will find how wrong you are! tnx

  • @smithcj218
    @smithcj218 2 года назад +63

    The Destroyers boxed them into a kill box, amazing AI improvements, far more realistic than the previous run, GREAT!!

    • @user-rb4kz2te8k
      @user-rb4kz2te8k 2 года назад +1

      not really in the real life the boat would have gone after the destroyers and wouldn't have gone into a kill zone. I think the only thing the simulation get right was those Mavericks , they could make a mincemeat of the boats if enough of them get fired

    • @bigDaddy-lx9sn
      @bigDaddy-lx9sn 2 года назад

      Well what you haven't taken into account is the Anti Ship Ballestic Missiles and Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Anti Ship Missiles installed on Speedboats almost all Iranian Gunboats carry Shoulder Launched Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Carry at least 2 Anti Ship Missiles too. While you stimulated Iranians running out of ammo but you didn't count American Navy running out of Ammo and if American Navy defeats Iranian navy in the Strait of Hormoz still they won't be able to leave Iranian coast which run almost 100 miles more along the Gulf of Persia. Anti Ship Missiles are deployed in heavy numbers all along the coast. Even if Americans take out entire force of Iranians along the gulf of hormuz they still won't be safe from other Iranian attack position. My estimate for casualty of this conflict is around 150 Gunboats along with it's crew and few drone and radar operators of Anti Ship and Anti Aircraft Missiles running at max at 1500-2000 Iranians. While heavy iranian attack on retreating formation of Americans navy is 3 Warships sunk and 1 taking light to heavy damage. Also Runway of Aircraft Carrier damaged with Casualty ranging from 600-1000 in single day not to mention Iranians attacking American Bases all over Middle East with Drones and Precision Missiles. Also fact to mention here Iran produces almost 150-200 Gunboats and Speedboats armed with Anti Ship Missiles every year and also is large producer of Anti Ship and guided rockets.

    • @TheAhanin
      @TheAhanin Год назад

      Lol Here US tried to highjack Iranian oil and Iranian navy cut them short and took the oil tanker. Google the incident, Reporter got it all wrong, actually its funny how he doesn't know anything about what's really going on in the video( that video is really famous)

  • @nathannakaji970
    @nathannakaji970 2 года назад +89

    Now thats what I'm talking about! I'd love to see some more reruns of old battles but with the new tactics (carrier disengaging, destroyers and cruisers actually doing escort work, etc. etc.) and see how they pan out! Much love from US Naval base Coronado!

    • @firebirdplayz9725
      @firebirdplayz9725 2 года назад +6

      Most certainly a stunning performance from the CSG... I love to see Cap learning about real navy tactics and applying them as his video series goes on!

    • @chikineater
      @chikineater 2 года назад

      This!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +16

      Yes I plan to re-do pretty much everything now I'm learning things.

    • @nathannakaji970
      @nathannakaji970 2 года назад +4

      @@grimreapers I won't say I'm an expert, but CV warfare has been my interest since my early teenage years, and I've studied under the best of the best (Real CV captain, 2 real bog pilots, and a DD XO)... If you want, I can hit you up on discord and give you some tactical advice. Best of luck!

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

  • @SuperDuperBDUB
    @SuperDuperBDUB 2 года назад +16

    Okay so this was FAR more realistic than the last video. Excellent to see the naval vessels actually maneuvering and doing things. Even the boghammers. It always drove me nuts to see a battlegroup under attack, with every ship just continuing straight at 15 knots lol.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +4

      agree realistic movements from now on.

    • @sherafati
      @sherafati 2 года назад

      How do you call this realistic? Drones sticking together, Gun boats moving forward not giving shit about being fired at, Silk worms left unprotected...

  • @aaronroode6298
    @aaronroode6298 2 года назад +16

    At 25:23 seeing that destroyer turning in towards the camera like that gave me goosebumps. Imagine how scary that must be in real life!
    I'd just be like: "Okay, where's the surrender button?"

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +4

      lol

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @jkasiron2275
      @jkasiron2275 2 года назад +1

      Arleigh Burke: "Not on my watch, bitches"

  • @damonried1720
    @damonried1720 2 года назад +36

    New & Improved carrier group coding plus improved/more realistic naval tactics equaled OverPowering show of force. Those destroyers were off the chain! Who let the Dawgs out indeed!

    • @rnash999
      @rnash999 2 года назад +2

      That one destroyer would have gotten rammed by multiple boats and sunk I think.

    • @johnhmstr
      @johnhmstr 2 года назад +4

      @@rnash999 Gotta keep in mind the navigation of all involved was scripted and fairly static. Real destroyer would have turned sooner and reacted to shadow from further off while spitting all she had the entire time.

    • @rnash999
      @rnash999 2 года назад +3

      @@johnhmstr You are right and I don't want to sound too negative anyway since I like these simulations over any other gaming videos.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +8

      This really shows how IMPORTANT correct naval tactics are and how they will make or break the battle.

  • @anotherone3340
    @anotherone3340 2 года назад +9

    This is crazy. Not only the explosions but also the camera angles, very cinematic

  • @n1ckf00c
    @n1ckf00c 2 года назад +12

    It's always hilarious reading the comments from the side that lost the fictional battle. "You're one sided." "Actually you need to use the weapon system that doesnt exist." "In reality, 6 billion missiles wouldve been fired from 360 degrees." "TORPEDOES AND SUBS". Like bruh, its a game with limited weapon systems and server capability. Keep up the good work Cap, these videos make my week!

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 2 года назад

      🤦‍♂️have you seen Iranian navy in the 80s? And they still have more subs than European countries. Anyway no body is developing new model's for Iran it would only be fair.

    • @n1ckf00c
      @n1ckf00c 2 года назад +2

      @@marshalljulie3676 my point wasn't specific to Iran's capabilities in DCS. You see it everytime a country loses "China would've launched thousands of missiles" "what about the virginia class subs". I just find it funny when people complain about a game that obviously doesnt fully represent the full capabilities of any country.

    • @RyTrapp0
      @RyTrapp0 2 года назад

      Yup, 100%. People act like the devs just have all the resources in the world to focus on the most irrelevant crap that the vast majority of players don't even care about. I mean, everyone understands that this is primarily a flight simulator... right?

    • @ireviewshtuff
      @ireviewshtuff 2 года назад

      @@marshalljulie3676 Didn’t they lose to Iraq in the 80s

    • @kevkivi2529
      @kevkivi2529 2 года назад

      @@ireviewshtuff nah they got invaded but the Iraqis never got anywhere and it just ended with a peace treaty that the UN imposed. No border changes, nothing. And back then Iran had just had a revolution and was unorganized and unstable yet they still managed to hold off the Iraqis which were supported by both the US and the USSR with weapons and equipment. Iran got most of it's stuff from Syria and China and whatever was left from the old governments armory. So to answer your question. No they did not loose.

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 2 года назад +96

    There is no way a gun on Boghammer could track and shoot with any accuracy.

    • @philcharles238
      @philcharles238 2 года назад +35

      They don't. It was sheer volume of fire that got clipped the Hornets. AI didn't do a good job of staying out of their relatively short range.

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 2 года назад +15

      You do realise this is a very downgraded iran navy like they really have military ships and the small boats are equipped with missiles

    • @HebrewHammerArmsCo
      @HebrewHammerArmsCo 2 года назад +6

      @@marshalljulie3676 LOl, but their best military ships keep mysteriously sinking or blowing up.... The their modern Navy is pretty useless

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +8

      Fair point

    • @clangerbasher
      @clangerbasher 2 года назад +6

      @@philcharles238 Have you ever driven a RHIB over 20kts never mind near on 50 and tried to do anything else? Yes it was sheer volume. I am saying it would be chaos.

  • @EvolvedTactical
    @EvolvedTactical 2 года назад +9

    I was watching the drones and thinking, "I wonder if the radar can pick up the blob of the swarm, and just have SM-2s detonate their proximity fuses in the middle of the group?" And then an SM-2 blew up in the middle of the group and dropped multiple drones at once.
    Well done.

    • @deanbrown2061
      @deanbrown2061 2 года назад

      I believe the Navy moved onto sm-3 and sm-6 mess-

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 2 года назад +4

    “When I grow up I wanna be a friggen Arleigh Burke!!” Sims just keep getting better and better, but half the fun is always the commentary!!

  • @Pimps-R-us
    @Pimps-R-us 2 года назад +4

    Your excitement during these videos all ways gets me laughing and I love it, Keep it up and keep them coming

  • @Minuz1
    @Minuz1 2 года назад +17

    When the gunboats passed the DD's, they could have knocked out their phalanx and radars with the duska's.
    More spacing for the drones so that a single SM-3 doesn't knock out 20 of them at a time.
    Make the attack happen at the same time, the boats were too slow, the drones too fast.
    The shield should be a valid target for them.

    • @bigDaddy-lx9sn
      @bigDaddy-lx9sn 2 года назад +5

      This video is flawed. Well what they haven't taken into account is the Anti Ship Ballestic Missiles and Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Anti Ship Missiles installed on Speedboats almost all Iranian Gunboats carry Shoulder Launched Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Carry at least 2 Anti Ship Missiles too. While they stimulated Iranians running out of ammo but didn't count American Navy running out of Ammo and if American Navy defeats Iranian navy in the Strait of Hormoz still they won't be able to leave Iranian coast which run almost 100 miles more along the Gulf of Persia. Anti Ship Missiles are deployed in heavy numbers all along the coast. Even if Americans take out entire force of Iranians along the gulf of hormuz they still won't be safe from other Iranian attack position. My estimate for casualty of this conflict is around 150 Gunboats along with it's crew and few drone and radar operators of Anti Ship and Anti Aircraft Missiles running at max at 1500-2000 Iranians. While heavy iranian attack on retreating formation of Americans navy is 3 Warships sunk and 1 taking light to heavy damage. Also Runway of Aircraft Carrier damaged with Casualty ranging from 600-1000 in single day not to mention Iranians attacking American Bases all over Middle East with Drones and Precision Missiles. Also fact to mention here Iran produces almost 150-200 Gunboats and Speedboats armed with Anti Ship Missiles every year and also is large producer of Anti Ship and guided rockets. Also 50 Drones and Anti Ship Missiles is a Small Number and only a fool would launch them from same direction following with almost all drones following same pathway making it easy for Americans to counter them.

    • @quarefremeruntgentes
      @quarefremeruntgentes Год назад

      Also, portraying the Ra'ad /Quader (i.e., reverse engineered, domestically produced Iranian Silkworm) as Iran's only anti-ship missile was rather disingenuous. Since the 1990s, Iran has developed multiple domestically produced anti-ship missiles, including several models of the Noor missile, capable of mach 0.9, and a long range, ballistic anti-ship missile capable of supersonic speed.

  • @tondara0
    @tondara0 2 года назад +4

    Cap. Thanks for this amazing video. I just wanted to clarify what is being deliberately misreported in the west. In this incident, the US destroyer was trying to seize the tanker and the Iranian ships stopped the seizure. Not the other way around! Of course no one wants to say that here!
    Nonetheless the Iranians seem quite suicidal in the way they are dealing with a US Destroyer!!!!

  • @alternativechannel9580
    @alternativechannel9580 2 года назад +1

    Absolutely great display of multiple technologies in combination with real world naval tactics. One of the best naval battles --

  • @-Hardstyle-
    @-Hardstyle- Год назад

    This is one of my favourites yet!! Awesome camera work and commentary CAP! 👌 Top notch entertainment!

  • @lightningxx
    @lightningxx 2 года назад +3

    The shots of the Arleigh burke doing that massive turn into the boats was amazing!

  • @grandayatollah5655
    @grandayatollah5655 2 года назад +3

    Something to note:
    The tanker was apparently Iranian and being seized back by the Iranians
    The catamaran was the Shahid Nazeri, the current flagship of the IRGC-N and is a patrol boat not a corvette. However they do have at least 3 catamaran corvettes under construction right now dubbed Shahid Soleimani

  • @manwithnoname6171
    @manwithnoname6171 2 года назад +2

    Really enjoyed this, those big ships firing all they have at those boats was amazing.

  • @blackhawks81H
    @blackhawks81H 2 года назад +8

    "Oh noooooo drone swarms are impossible to deal with because they fly in such tight clouds that radar has a super hard time dealing with."
    WW2 Flak gunners: "Ahem...."

  • @Nealetony
    @Nealetony 2 года назад +10

    Boats should have secondary target priority on destroyer and frigate in proximity.

  • @subjectc7505
    @subjectc7505 2 года назад +9

    That one machine gunner was very eager to fire at the destoryer 😂

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +1

      agree

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Enjoy the fantasy movie

  • @cshader2488
    @cshader2488 2 года назад +2

    That was a fantastic video! Nice work guys!

  • @rounaksingh409
    @rounaksingh409 2 года назад +11

    Hey Cap tho all the boghammers were programmed to only attack the carrier but if they were programmed to attack the carrier group as a whole I think they would have disabled or seriously damaged several destroyers as many of them crossed the picket line.
    Also, Iranian SAMs should have been there to defend the missile sites.

    • @KondorDCS
      @KondorDCS 2 года назад

      This was a pretty stupid demo, catering typically to american audiences. So unrealistic it's actually funny.

  • @cnlbenmc
    @cnlbenmc 2 года назад +3

    How to spice this up; maybe have the Iranians have proper Aircraft in the Mix along with Missile Boats and their Frigates. On the US Side; have either a large Recon plane or Drone (like JSTARS or Global Hawk) to scan the Surface for threats and a bigger CAP with maybe even land based craft to support the group. This would be a high priority mission then having some Frigates tagging along for support for the carrier would make sense, they would probably be some form of LCS variant as the Constellation class hasn't entered service so using either the Oliver Hazard Perrys or if they're in the game the FREMM as a stand in for the Constellations (as it will be a variant of this) might work.

  • @ecbst6
    @ecbst6 2 года назад +7

    Real-world training grounds.
    We also used to watch from the AWACS while Iran and Iraq went at it in the 80's.

  • @jkasiron2275
    @jkasiron2275 2 года назад

    Realistic or not, these are the most entertaining videos on YT! Well done, GR team!

  • @roryross3878
    @roryross3878 2 года назад

    You're unbridled excitement was infectious AF!!!

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 2 года назад +10

    This was an amazing battle. A one-sided battle but an amazing one nonetheless.
    My only critique is that the carrier should've sent up Seahawk helicopters packing missiles in addition to the Hornets.
    If getting atomized by a Maverick was bad for those boats, imagine how much worse it would've been if those Hornets were packing Stormbreakers.

    • @AgentSmith911
      @AgentSmith911 2 года назад +1

      Yup, it'd be a turkey shoot. But the Iranians also pack more advanced anti ship missiles fired from shore that could do more damage.

    • @grahamstrouse1165
      @grahamstrouse1165 2 года назад +1

      @@AgentSmith911 Shore-based missiles are a bigger threat IRL. Fleets tend to run out of bullets before forts…

  • @Elzon1
    @Elzon1 2 года назад +18

    Next time have the drones spread out initially so they don't get killed when they're grouped up as easily.

    • @anuvisraa5786
      @anuvisraa5786 2 года назад +3

      ant he silk worms dont need radar traking from land

  • @Bacondoggo
    @Bacondoggo 2 года назад +1

    SOOO COOL!!! Nice job on the scenario.

  • @theymusthatetesla3186
    @theymusthatetesla3186 2 года назад +1

    That was one of the best yet!!

  • @rickfox4068
    @rickfox4068 2 года назад +5

    In the confined space of the Persian Gulf, the escorts would never leave the carrier, and do not have to. Their SPY 1 / 6 radar system and VLS give them a 360 degree coverage of the entire gulf. They would literally see the planes taking off from Iran and forming up. Missile keys would be turned and the system put into automatic. Also the helicopters and planes from shore bases would enter the fray and kill small boats.
    At the end of the sim, it was asked if this was realistic? I would say yes. The software and hardware is always being updated. I would say that the only unrealistic thing was that the 5" were not shooting the silkworms. This was done in the 90's when the Iranians shot some at US warships with some success. With newer radars and control systems, this would be easier with the more modern 5" gun and its newer proximity fuses. Plus silkworms are SLOW and HUGE respectively.

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 2 года назад +30

    If Mod 0 Sea Wolf could knock 4.5in shells doing over Mach 1 out of the air I don't think these slow and much larger drones are going to trouble a system like Aegis nearly 40 years on.

    • @unhippy1
      @unhippy1 2 года назад +11

      no it won't trouble an aegis or similar....it will however run it out of ammunition and in real life the drones will just keep coming in by the hundred.....thats the second scary part of drone warfare.....add to that the drones ability to home in on any electronic emissions including jamming and it makes them very hard to counter with current weapons systems......i'd imagine in future we may see 30 and 50cal close in weapons systems liberally festooned on every military ship, vehicle and fixed position as standard equipment

    • @aaronkratzmann9703
      @aaronkratzmann9703 2 года назад +7

      @@unhippy1 Would AEGIS at full power fry the drones right out of the air? I have heard it can be damaging to sensitive electronics.

    • @unhippy1
      @unhippy1 2 года назад +8

      @@aaronkratzmann9703 military Drones are hardened against emp and directed radar emissions.....drones aren't much use if the enemy can use a 'electronic broom' to sweep them out of the sky

    • @downix
      @downix 2 года назад +5

      @@unhippy1 I don't think people realize that a Burke in AA configuration only has 40 or so anti-air missiles.

    • @danielsummey4144
      @danielsummey4144 2 года назад +5

      @@unhippy1 Yeah, thing is, these drones can and will be jammed as well. The cheaper they are, the easier they are to be jammed long before they get to the fleet. That’s why the Arleigh Burke’s just got fitted with a new electronic warfare system.
      Beyond that, lasers. Lasers have an unlimited magazine depth and can already, today, take down drones.
      People like to write about the irrelevance of the carrier group because of whatever new tech is the fad, but chances are we already have the stuff to defeat it today.

  • @madmike5621
    @madmike5621 2 года назад +1

    That was awesome! Love watching your simulations ... your enthusiasm showed through ... "BRRrrt BRRrrt Go Arleigh Burke ... I want to be an Arleigh Burke when I grow up!" :-)

  • @ruf01au
    @ruf01au 2 года назад

    great vid Cap - thanks for sharing

  • @forester6335
    @forester6335 2 года назад +5

    Great video, would love to see how ww2 battleships deal with a swam attack. I believe the amount of AAA batteries and small guns on the battleships would be interesting.

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 2 года назад +12

    It does go to show that Western escorts operating in those waters can't have too many cannon or HMG's.

    • @marmite8959
      @marmite8959 2 года назад +6

      There's a very good reason destroyers have those Bushmasters on top of the CIWS and main armament

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +2

      agree

    • @clangerbasher
      @clangerbasher 2 года назад +1

      @@marmite8959 Yes indeed.

  • @naowaratyooktanun2068
    @naowaratyooktanun2068 2 года назад +1

    Really fun, thank you.

  • @jamiewaterman8147
    @jamiewaterman8147 2 года назад +2

    That was FUN! Loved the commentary! I want Cap to give commentary to movies. (Luke blows up the Death Star) "BOOM! Right in the face! - (Titanic strikes the iceberg) "BOOM! Right in the face! - (Rocky knocks out Drago) "BOOM! Right in the face! (Any porno film) "BOOM! Right in the face! See? It just works!

  • @TurbodanNM
    @TurbodanNM 2 года назад +20

    I do feel that these results are more representative of the actual capabilities of these weapons.

    • @adilachahbar3154
      @adilachahbar3154 2 года назад

      This might shock you No, the results in this game do not represent anything close to real life

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +4

      agree

    • @30yearsofexprnce
      @30yearsofexprnce 2 года назад

      Really are you stupid or somthing? Iranian know all captblity of US forces they trained for dozen years watching US acts on region they know when and how send drones. All boats have missle even some under water missle lunch from boat i saw them 10 years ago wich the second country made them was iran. Also if thease dron was detected dont call them kamikazi. evey US bas3 hit with thease kamikaze dailyy and devil US forces cant do anything. even mackenzy said that.
      Go search about a simulation test took place in US for simulate iran gunboats power and result was desaster for US Side.
      where is iran mini submrines. iran have thousnd thounsdlnd of them. they just created to destroy Us warships in gulf because they are very small and radar cant detect them. Chinase call them predator wolves or bee stings stategy go search thease things and lean and then make program.
      even iran air defences shot down the US most anit radar dron . iran gental said we can shoot down that special spy plan that day but we decided to shot down drone becaise dont want kill soldiers. but there isnt any air defence in your video lol.
      they have radrs with 500 km range go search name is Quds radar. and air defense with 350 km and new advance techs.
      also they can lunch messle from yemen.
      they are so capbe on hijack they hack every drone of US u can imagen.
      they are sea mines there they are emps
      and more more. and you tell us this is realistc!
      dont fool urself

    • @bigDaddy-lx9sn
      @bigDaddy-lx9sn 2 года назад

      @@grimreapers Well what you haven't taken into account is the Anti Ship Ballestic Missiles and Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Anti Ship Missiles installed on Speedboats almost all Iranian Gunboats carry Shoulder Launched Anti Aircraft Missiles and also Carry at least 2 Anti Ship Missiles too. While you stimulated Iranians running out of ammo but you didn't count American Navy running out of Ammo and if American Navy defeats Iranian navy in the Strait of Hormoz still they won't be able to leave Iranian coast which run almost 100 miles more along the Gulf of Persia. Anti Ship Missiles are deployed in heavy numbers all along the coast. Even if Americans take out entire force of Iranians along the gulf of hormuz they still won't be safe from other Iranian attack position. My estimate for casualty of this conflict is around 150 Gunboats along with it's crew and few drone and radar operators of Anti Ship and Anti Aircraft Missiles running at max at 1500-2000 Iranians. While heavy iranian attack on retreating formation of Americans navy is 3 Warships sunk and 1 taking light to heavy damage. Also Runway of Aircraft Carrier damaged with Casualty ranging from 600-1000 in single day not to mention Iranians attacking American Bases all over Middle East with Drones and Precision Missiles. Also fact to mention here Iran produces almost 150-200 Gunboats and Speedboats armed with Anti Ship Missiles every year and also is large producer of Anti Ship and guided rockets.

    • @HHTP6
      @HHTP6 2 года назад

      @@bigDaddy-lx9sn nobody reading that

  • @johnhmstr
    @johnhmstr 2 года назад +36

    holy moly, that was intense. Really glad to see the DCS folks react and improve coding over time. This was one of my favorites yet. Very well done.
    You know the change in coding means all the previous tests are invalid... repeats required for updated results ;-)

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад +15

      Yup, I've literally been told by the top brass in ED that they are upgrading the naval stuff in response and I will "have to re-do all of the naval vids". Challenge accepted Sirs...

  • @RokkHunter
    @RokkHunter Год назад

    This was excellent. Really nice to see you've used the Super carrier Mod the way it should be.

  • @dankuchar6821
    @dankuchar6821 2 года назад +2

    Thanks for this!

  • @redgriffindiver7740
    @redgriffindiver7740 2 года назад +3

    Before watching the actual fight with knowledge of the setup I would: 1) engage Silkworms with SM2, 1a) If a Silkworm get's past the SM2s then ESSM, RAM, and PHALANX should engage., 2) Engage Boghammer's with aircraft until close-in, 3) Engage drones with aircraft if available, 4) Chew up any leftover Boghammer or Drone with PHALANX Surface mode because that's what it was designed to do.

  • @robertspivey46
    @robertspivey46 2 года назад +4

    @Grim Reapers Just to let you know, when i was a flight deck yellow shirt on the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT CVN 71, we had 45 aircraft on deck. ship wide there was 82 total. during the Persian Gulf war there was two aircraft from the Iraqi AF 400 miles out on intercept heading for us, we launched every aircraft turning. trust me when i say you need to rework your model.

  • @junak8823
    @junak8823 2 года назад +1

    I love the tactics element you added to video.

  • @timblack6422
    @timblack6422 2 года назад +1

    Most realistic yet. Great job!

  • @jenniferstewarts4851
    @jenniferstewarts4851 2 года назад +7

    Well at least it wasn't the canadian attack on shipping. CF-18's had a bad attack run on an Iraqi frigate. nothing worked... anti-ship missiles failed to lock on. Bombs failed to drop, then when they went to guns, they only got off about 50 rounds each before BOTH guns on the 2 CF-18's jammed. apparently sand had gotten EVERYWHERE and just messed up everything on the poor cf-18's.

    • @humansvd3269
      @humansvd3269 2 года назад

      I hope they learned from that lesson. But what was Canada doing attacking an iraqi frigate? I thought they never participated in combat against Iraq.

    • @jenniferstewarts4851
      @jenniferstewarts4851 2 года назад +2

      @@humansvd3269 first iraq war. not 2nd. it was one of the silly jokes with that... and on those grounds, we got the US to upgrade the CF-18's for us. the problem was... they would only upgrade the ones in the theater...
      so someone in the canadian military got the silly idea that... we needed to rotate arecraft into the theater so the previous ones could have their airframes checked. we got about half our aircraft upgraded before someone in the US military got wize to what we were pulling.

    • @leonardwei3914
      @leonardwei3914 2 года назад +1

      @@jenniferstewarts4851 Lol, that's actually brilliant on the Canadian military to get the U.S. to pay for their aircraft upgrades. I'm wondering if their claims that they aren't interested in the F35s and re-opened the fighter competition is just another similar scheme to trick the U.S. into paying for new planes.

  • @abledog9462
    @abledog9462 2 года назад +3

    I love working nights with the helos, just inside the skin of the ship on a Burke at the waterline and getting woken up during gun shoot days. I would lay there under the red lights and just listen to the 25mm, 5in, CIWS, Browning half inches and M240s while at the same time hearing the water over the hull and being rocked. Pure sensory pleasure

  • @otrotland5377
    @otrotland5377 2 года назад +2

    wow, what a way to spend a lunch break, thank you.

  • @downix
    @downix 2 года назад +12

    If only the sim included the MANPADS those boats are typically loaded with.

  • @devinodulchaoinitigh5467
    @devinodulchaoinitigh5467 2 года назад +3

    Dude as a sailor in the Canadian Navy this was fucking awesome. Pretty much what we're trained to do when we roll with the Americans; we'll throw our ships in like cannon fodder with the Arleighs to save the carrier's

  • @ChristopherSloane
    @ChristopherSloane 2 года назад +10

    Drones should come in at a couple of different directions at wave height. Also there would be more than 50 so 200. The small boat swarm would also engage at different angles and they do have missile boats. So a mix of small boats would be better and much more realistic. There would also be a CAP up as well. Silk worm missiles and radar need to be spread out abit as well.

    • @trolleriffic
      @trolleriffic 2 года назад

      @@ColonelHoganStalag13 Air and surface attacks against a CBG that's specifically designed and organised to defend against exactly that is only ever going to end one way. Now if DCS had torpedoes and mines (especially homing mines) modelled properly then you'd see how much fun can be had when you take the carrier air wing and all those Aegis systems out of the equation entirely.

    • @ChristopherSloane
      @ChristopherSloane 2 года назад

      @@ColonelHoganStalag13 Well yaaa see if the opposing sides weapon systems can detect and kill you farther out than your weapon systems that is what happens.

    • @override367
      @override367 2 года назад

      @@ColonelHoganStalag13 and the US aircraft wouldn't be flying 10 feet off the ground and the CG would launch helos as well, it's just having a bit of fun not a predictor of anything (in reality it would be a staggering failure of intelligence for an attack of this scale to be prepared undetected)

    • @BoleDaPole
      @BoleDaPole 2 года назад +1

      In real life the US carrier group would see all this activity happening from miles away and wouldn't even go near it.

  • @randomnature8493
    @randomnature8493 2 года назад

    Your comment to RC about his hook had me listing laughing, recently found your channel and havnt stopped binge watching everything, thanks for the great content 👍

  • @usquanigo
    @usquanigo 2 года назад +1

    This was absolutely epic!

  • @glenproctor1999
    @glenproctor1999 2 года назад +8

    The Iranian timing was off which meant it became a piecemeal attack. Just perfectly shows how difficult a time on target attack is to co-ordinate. Could add AA sites and dispersion to the Silkworm site to help? Those Hornets got a too easy ride.

    • @override367
      @override367 2 года назад +2

      the hornets were being piloted by chimps so I think it's fair

    • @lavenderlilacproductions
      @lavenderlilacproductions Год назад

      Could have added a late flight of Iranian Mirages or Mig 29s since the Hornets were all loaded anti ship.

  • @antonfig1865
    @antonfig1865 2 года назад +8

    It seems to me that the escort ships would be a priority for the Boghammers. For exactly this reason. If that first Destroyer had gotten pounded one or two that were essentially torpedos what is its combat effectiveness after that?
    It would also be nice to see them with a mix of weapons like they often have, though I realize that might be hard on the server. But a 106 mm recoilless rife is going to hurt the thin skin of a modern destroyer, even the Dushka's and some RPG fire could damage sensitive equipment, reducing the effectiveness of the ship.
    THe Silkworms might be set to target the biggest thing in the water. But the Boghammers have wetware guidance systems.

  • @dr.strangelove7696
    @dr.strangelove7696 2 года назад

    Outstanding video cap! On the edge of my seat lol Better than Hollywood

  • @axilleas
    @axilleas Год назад +1

    I am a pacifist to the very bottom of my soul, against all sorts of war etc. How you've managed to reel me in to the point I don't miss an episode is beyond reason but I love what you do with these videos!

  • @wayfaringman8418
    @wayfaringman8418 2 года назад +4

    This was bloody awesome to view. I'd try an attack after the US Navy passes the straight with two different groups of boats assaulting the carrier group in a pincer movement, w/ missiles and drones coming from the Iranian coast into the center of the US Navy. Spread the defense out a bit and see how it handles the zerg boat rush from 2-3 directions.

    • @trolleriffic
      @trolleriffic 2 года назад +2

      I'd litter the sea bed with mines, especially homing models that release a torpedo when they're triggered. An SM-2 or Phalanx is worth exactly squat against a weapon like that.

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 2 года назад +4

    Sick battle!👍 Talk about A LOT of moving parts!🤯👍
    What about The Iranian F-14's, UH-1H's attacking with The Boggs Plus Flak guns protecting the Silkworms! Lol just part of my old request for this scenario, perhaps next time. Please give all U.S. Support Ships Helicopters

  • @sebastes0558
    @sebastes0558 2 года назад +1

    Yes! Yes! Yes! Now revisit the other Carrier challenges using similar strategy. Well done!

  • @Mariner311
    @Mariner311 2 года назад

    Exciting watching the set-up... I transited the Strait a dozen times in 1987-96. I remember the pucker-factor, and launching in an SH-60B a few times loaded with Hellfires, AND sitting in CIC/Strike on the carrier a number of times when I was "older". We ALWAYS had their Port and any KNOW Styx/Chinese missile sites targeted with Cruise missiles.
    DANG that was exciting after watching - from 0-120mph in seconds, and 5-10 minutes of terror.

  • @aliparvazi9592
    @aliparvazi9592 2 года назад +7

    It was really interesting...but...
    I think you have not taken into account some critical parameters:
    -Iran has a long shore across the Persian gulf and will not initiate an attack just from one point. (you have to change the model to a more multi-directional attack)
    -They currently have faster surface to sea missiles which they can hide in a passenger VANs and shoot at any location on the beach
    -You have not taken into account the air cover of old mighty F-14s
    -You have not taken into account the heavy SAM coverage in the area if they are going to initiate such an attach (something like "Sevom Khordad" which brought down the Global Hawk a while ago")
    -Most of those speed boats are equipped with rocket launchers
    -Some of those are equipped with light anti aircraft missiles like Stinger too
    -No one initiate a drone swarm that close to each other which the opponent can bring multiple of them down by a single missile blast wave
    -Also, I don't know how long would it take, to take about 120 Mavericks out of the box and load them on 30 F-18s, and bring them up to the deck. I don't think they are sitting in the lower deck fully loaded with Mavericks by default.
    -And finally, they are heavily promoting their short range pin pointing ballistic missiles which they believe they are the main threat to the aircraft carriers.
    it would be interesting if you can simulate it again factoring these parameters in... :)

    • @willwozniak2826
      @willwozniak2826 2 года назад

      They can only do so much to avoid server crashes man.

  • @Andy81ish
    @Andy81ish 2 года назад +4

    Can you add the Drone launcher on an Oil tanker that might be able to get closer prior to launch. Reduce the reaction time.

  • @penroc3
    @penroc3 2 года назад

    as a valued viewer. i appreciate your hard work

  • @1ShopSnipe
    @1ShopSnipe 2 года назад

    The commentary while watching this is the best part!

  • @steveblevins9018
    @steveblevins9018 2 года назад +5

    The follow-up action that would ensue after the hornets that are airworthy would rearm and would be hunting every Iranian naval, missile, and airforce asset in the gulf. Let alone what the Arleigh Burkes and subs would unleash on the coastline after the sun goes down. I am sure the Iranians have not forgotten what Ronald Reagen did to them in the 1980s.

    • @eduwino151
      @eduwino151 2 года назад +1

      The only realistic way Iran ever gets to touch and harm the navy is if they staged a peacetime ambush , during a war they will be smoked hard from about 500kms away

  • @simmysims9209
    @simmysims9209 2 года назад +5

    Instead of waves, boats, missiles and drones should have timed to be "at range" same time to have as many targets it's possible to overwhelm defence.

  • @DanFarfan
    @DanFarfan 2 года назад +1

    truly excellent !!

  • @aboriani
    @aboriani 2 года назад +1

    I love this channel because as a viewer, I feel valued

  • @fat_biker
    @fat_biker 2 года назад +3

    I'd have thought that spreading the silkworms out, concealing them, holding them back & then using a lot of them to take out the pickets as the fast patrol craft get close should be a thing. Also, arguably, wait to launch the drone swarm & the silkworm strike until the fast boats are closer to the target. Also, have the fast boat groups take different routes to the target, start from different places give the fast boat crews manpads as well as dushkas & put some air defences around the Iranian land based assets, because it wouldn't be a fun place to fly...

  • @ptonpc
    @ptonpc 2 года назад +3

    From what I remember regards the tanker. It was being used by Iran to smuggle oil. The US Navy was coming to seize it, so the Iranians snatched it first.

  • @urimeltzer197
    @urimeltzer197 2 года назад +1

    I honestly think this was your best video yet

  • @MrJoel9679
    @MrJoel9679 2 года назад +1

    Yes Cap. Arleigh Burke turning into formation and firing with aggression was super sexy.

  • @Hierachy
    @Hierachy 2 года назад +4

    Would love to see a russian aircraft carrier group version of this! imagine all of those CIWS going off....

  • @TheGreg6466
    @TheGreg6466 2 года назад +5

    That was so much cooler than the last boghammer attack, DCS has really improved. That was very entertaining, thanks Cap.

  • @JoeC-bz2ep
    @JoeC-bz2ep 2 года назад +2

    Its nice to see those DDG's step up and perform now.

  • @thesovis
    @thesovis 2 года назад

    Great video!

  • @ashtiboy
    @ashtiboy 2 года назад +5

    like i also said about chinese drone vs a us supercarriers groups fleets! like i said before ciws and aegis cruisers sm-2 missiles go brrrrr and are super effective against drones!

  • @WardenWolf
    @WardenWolf 2 года назад +57

    I think the CIWS is unrealistically underwhelming. It misses way too much. Also, in real life there would be sailors manning .50's on the railings and the big guns would be more accurate as well.

    • @Justineexy
      @Justineexy 2 года назад +9

      negative, the phalanx misses a lot. there are videos that proves it.

    • @johnhmstr
      @johnhmstr 2 года назад +4

      .50's and m240's both on the rails i would imagine. Completely agree on the CIWS being rather silly in its inaccuracy against boat targets.

    • @angelarch5352
      @angelarch5352 2 года назад +7

      Phalanx shooting at small boats on the ocean misses all the time in real life. It's hard top believe, but just go watch videos of it trying.

    • @spaceisalie5451
      @spaceisalie5451 2 года назад +5

      CIWS made me almost piss myself hearing that shit. They give a warning they’re gonna fire but I somehow didnt hear it, walked on the catwalk and fuuuuck that thing was loud and terrifying.
      Wouldn’t be the first time i pissed myself, won’t be the last.

    • @reminder9146
      @reminder9146 2 года назад +10

      When shooting at boats the CIWS is almost always in manual, meaning there is a real person aiming the gun through its camera. A second long burst throws 75 tungsten rounds towards a target. If even a quarter of those rounds hit, which they often do, anything topside would be turned into a mangled eviscerated mess. So those videos everybody is talking about... yea... You're also right. There would be crew served M240's and M2's on the lifelines. The DDG and the FAC/FIAC would have traded a lot more fire.
      Also it's worth noting, that Carrier would not be launching fighters in the middle of a surface action unless the excrement had really REALLY hit the fan. And by that I mean a asymmetrical combat situation where there was an incoming air strike, (not drones or missiles but planes), A submarine threat, a surface action, and a unmanned vehicle swarm. Finely, DCS does not model the U.S. Navy's MK-45 MOD 4 5"/54 caliber lightweight gun very well. HE-VT shells would be the weapon of choice for slow drones like that. A ship would be loath to use its SM2 inventory on tightly grouped drones like that. Especially with a battery of ASCM's are launching from the coast.

  • @LT_Commander_Data
    @LT_Commander_Data 2 года назад +1

    Awesome video!!!!

  • @doubleugly1594
    @doubleugly1594 2 года назад +1

    Haa I remember suggesting this like a year and half ago on one of your videos.. very cool

  • @exterminater267
    @exterminater267 2 года назад +8

    SM-2 would actually detonate when its own warhead senses proximity. So the millisecond it enters the swarm it would detonate.
    Edit: CIWS would also completely shred any subsonic thing entering its range. It even shoots at CHAFF autonomously. It doesnt get confused. If theres any sort of radar blip thats not marked it will shoot at it.

  • @catz1845
    @catz1845 2 года назад +3

    that was Absolutely fucken Awesome

  • @s4ss.m8
    @s4ss.m8 2 года назад

    Watching those Burkes roll hard and turn is like IRL, those things can move so crazy for a big ship

  • @leswilliamson3587
    @leswilliamson3587 2 года назад

    That was awesome to watch

  • @jameslynn7271
    @jameslynn7271 2 года назад +7

    You need to try this with a navy amphibious group. include Army Apache's with USMC Cobras / Huey's, AV-8s

  • @LosLS2
    @LosLS2 2 года назад +12

    I believe that a carrier battlegroup can hit a swarm of drones with enough radar radiation to make them freak out at least.

  • @gryper1690
    @gryper1690 2 года назад

    That was the most awesome display Ive ever seen with a video game/sim.

  • @joenefflen845
    @joenefflen845 2 года назад +1

    Because ships can unmask more weapons, EW and fire control directors off their beam, the escorts would probably zig zag away from the threat, like alternating a 45 degree tack away. They want to be able to employ those weapons systems while trying to keep the range open. Most likely the CG would probably try to keep up with the CV and keep the best position for air defense while the DDG's zig zag and do their best to engage surface threats. Once air threats got within engagement range, the CG would turn some to unmask all its directors and EW systems while engaging vampires.

  • @fishrrelaxing9361
    @fishrrelaxing9361 2 года назад +3

    Reading comments I’ve come to an interesting thought for another sim..
    First of all a gun mounted to a frame of a boat that small running thar fast over waves and wakes wouldn’t hit anything.. I don’t think anyone is even dumb enough to try that lol.. what would be much more appropriate would be seeing if those vessels can hold the weigh of Torpedo launch tubes on the side and if the Iranians are even have the supply enough for this.. I’d mount two single tubes on each boat.. send three groups from different angles of attack with 100’ spreads on the blast within each group.. wouldn’t waste time with drones as that just isn’t a real threat to a navel fleet unless they can send thousands..
    Each of the three boat groups would at the center have a corvette or some other larger vessel that can defend the smaller boats till they can get to close enough but out of deck gun range launch torpedos and flee.. maybe a few of them loaded with explosives continue on.. all while launching some worms from multiple locations.. backed up by s300 to defend them against anything getting too close.. there is too much air support as I said before.. it takes time to arm fighters and time to get them to the deck.. this sort of engagement you’d have maybe 5-10 fighters ready at best.. they would actually be scrambling ground aircraft from near buy bases cause they would arrive faster then the carrier could get aircraft loaded, fueled and in the air.. 30 f18’s wo prior advanced warning and preparation is a spontaneous attack would take a full day to happen.

  • @alexandermendeyev35
    @alexandermendeyev35 2 года назад +3

    Remember those dolphin shaped speed boats that could submerge and jump out of the water while moving real fast?. Imagine building a couple hundreds of those full with explosives. When getting near gun range they start submerging and coming out randomnly. Probably not the most traditional way of thinking but im pretty sure they would be harder to shoot than this boats.

  • @ausboy9251
    @ausboy9251 2 года назад +1

    That was awsome guys 👍👍👍

  • @cranedaddy678
    @cranedaddy678 2 года назад +2

    I've served on an Arleigh Burke class destroyer and Spruance class destroyer and witness exercises kind of similar to this (where the ships smaller guns shoot at a small object) and I honestly think the Americans would be lucky to kill 1/3 of these boats before they were out of ammo.
    You also touched on leadership too, we're out of good ones.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  2 года назад

      Roger Crane

    • @X.Y.Z.07
      @X.Y.Z.07 2 года назад

      Wow is the Mk. 45 really that inaccurate?

    • @cranedaddy678
      @cranedaddy678 2 года назад +1

      @@X.Y.Z.07 We were shooting .30 cal, and .50 cal machine guns and a 20mm? cannon if I remember right. My job didn't have anything to do with shooting guns, I just got to watch.
      The Mk 45 is a beast and super accurate but we didn't use it for the exercises we were doing.