Same with my sister who is a police officer! Police officers of integrity usually advise their loved ones not to deal with police because many are scummy as hell.
Wow. That’s pretty revealing isn’t it. Your dad seems to know he worked with some bad dudes. It takes a bad dude to put a guy in prison who’s not guilty.
@JTC there is no similarity to the bully. And usually bullying victims go to the school, etc, not to the bully 's parents! And your anecdotal experience with law enforcement pales in comparison to those of us who lived it for our career. It's like me having a bad experience with a black mugger, and condeming all black people as being criminal and alike. Duh. Also, a criminal accomplishes nothing good coming to my home to confront my family. My wife doesn't control me. Dept regulations, the law, and the courts do. Bullying cops get found out and fired or harassed by their dept. Criminal cops get prosecuted. That's not to say that innocent cops don't get tarred with a false Reputation by a zealous news media. I've seen that numerous times. It's the damned of you do, damned if you don't, scenario. Judging any human activity by the exception rather than the rule cheats them and you.
My uncle was a criminal defense attorney and a law school professor. When I was a freshman and decided to go to the same college that he taught at he basically told me the same thing but he added call him first.
Actually, that's not right. It should be: 1. Request a lawyer 2. Do not answer any questions 3. If in doubt, see 1 How am I supposed to request a lawyer while remaining silent?
@@RossTheNinja You carry a card with your lawyer's details on it? When you travel out of state, where your lawyer probably can't practice law, the first thing you do is get an attorney's card with his information in case you need it? I guess you have already done that, so you carry around a big stack of lawyer's business cards, so this information clearly is not for you.
When I was 12 I was home alone and someone tried to break into my house. It was a fairly passive attempt (whoever it was ran off after seeing me inside), but I was scared enough to call the police. They showed up and went looking around my neighborhood. The neighbors two doors down were not completely clean so the father took off into the back woods leaving his son behind in the house. The officers went into that house (notably without a warrant or good cause) and found the boy hiding in a closet. They called me in to identify him. That teenage boy was crying and terrified. The police told me that he had confessed to trying to break in to my home. That kid was obviously scared enough to confess to the Lincoln and JFK assassinations. He didn't match the description I had given them, and I told them that. They acted like I was suddenly lying to them. Fortunately, I held my ground and told them firmly this kid was innocent. Glad I wasn't used to wrongfully imprison a teenager.
Wow, is police like that all over the world? I had a somewhat similar experience when I was called to the police station to identify my robber. Considering that I saw the guy's face several inches from mine and he was young and very blond, they were showing me a much older guy with dark hair. And gosh they tried to make me say that it was him. It was scary. It's like I was guilty of something when in reality they just didn't want to do their job.
From a police officer: "Never talk to the police even if you're innocent because anything you say can be used as evidence against you. Invoke your right to the 5th amendment (this is not an admittance of guilt) and request a lawyer. I keep that advice to heart
My lawyer is a humble guy. He told me if I ever talk to police about anything, without him present, he will kick my teeth out. I think it might be pretty serious advise to not talk to police even when you're innocent.
Remember my first encounter with these dirty tricks was getting into big trouble at school and the teachers would say ‘all your friends have already told us what happened’ even though they hadn’t, worked an absolute treat
Remember.. You have the right to remain silent. When they tell you that you are allowed to leave whenever you want to leave... LEAVE QUIETLY AND QUICKLY.
@@camello321 When someone says that you have the right to remain silent... take that advice.... when they say that you are allowed to leave because you are not under arrest.... you most certainly are allowed to leave so the only thing to do is.... leave. They are skilled at trapping people into saying and doing things that help them out with their investigation and that’s not your responsibility... translation is: shut your mouth and kindly leave because it’s your right. Never let go of your rights because that’ll mean you’re losing your freedom.
That’s the issue with interrogation. You have no idea why you are there and being told, not asked, told that you murdered someone is a shock. And most people brains just kinda misfire and they will do whatever the police want for it to be over.
I mean, if you could leave at any time you wanted, how did you even get there in the first place? Do not go to the police station unless they arrest you.
I never understood why a suspect never decides to just end the interrogation by getting up and leaving the building, the agents literally tell them they’re free to leave anytime.
None of these taped conversations should have ever happened because the only thing you should ever say when questioned by the police is, "I want an attorney."
And they will say "only someone guilty would say that". But that should leave you unphased because unless they can prove something that statement doesn't mean anything.
Its interesting, because lawyer is a double edged sword. If you ask for a lawyer people may think you're hiding something💁♂️ still asking for a lawyer is the best thing for you if you're guilty or innocent.
@@seriousclown4139 no it cannot lmfao. A confession has to be a confession. Words can’t be twisted around and used as a confession, that defeats the whole purpose. What OP is saying that if they actually have you on video, they wouldn’t waste their time trying to get a confession because a video is open and shut evidence
Imagine lying to a 17yo kid who just lost his mother that his own father identified him as the killer. It's no wonder the police are so rarely viewed kindly in the community. They just want to send someone to prison. It's a bonus if they're actually guilty.
You're assumption about the police and there ultimate goal seems a bit misguided. There are those police officers who will lock anyone up as long as it benefits them in a personal sense but to define all police officers under the same umbrella is not only dangerous but ignorant.
@@whome6415 Well when you figure out a way to tell the good from the bad let me know because they've all got the same uniform. Until then, I'm going to smile and nod and not trust a word they say.
Clearly you watch too much TV. Or listen to advicates. I've talked to defense attorneys who feel the DAs take every case that gets near them. But... 100% of defense atty clients in court are charged. Their perception is wrong when you look at all suspects in all cases. When a DA says "i know he probably did it, but I can't likely prove it in court, so I refuse the case" no defense attorney is bemoaning his innocent client being charged. Their perception is innaccurate. You might get rousted by cops 100 times. But you can't say that cops roust every one. Your experience is only you. Yet you blame the cop who reacts impoperly because all his minority contacts were negative against him, so he judges all minority contacts with caution or apprehension. If you do it, why be surprised when cops do it?
Put your sensitivity aside and understand that this is about interrogation techniques and how they are used by law enforcement personnel. This is clearly stated and the video used from his interrogation displayed this..it isn’t about Watts.
Just plead the 5th. And realize this, if police had concrete evidence against you, you'd most likely already be in handcuffs. The fact that they're so hell bent on a person confessing means they don't have anything and the only way you get trapped is if you confess. Just lawyer up
@@Dasanie then you'd be in handcuffs already. The fact that they're interrogating you for hours day in and day out most likely means they're only relying on your confession to put you in jail.
@@MandeepSingh-ki6ve or if they get a confession, their chances of getting you locked up his higher then fighting you in court and potentially having the falsified evidence discovered
My father is a retired police offer and taught me you never ever talk to the police if you are arrested and immediately ask for a lawyer. Even if they tell you oh you are staying here over night until we get you one. Nope that’s fine I’ll wait for my lawyer.
What's the first thing an LEO will do if suspected of wrong doing or violating policy? He gets his union lawyer! Cops are the biggest hypocrites, next to politicians.
@@jackma3730 Except while in jail, just to keep yourself alive you may THEN end up having to do something that will give them a legitimate reason to now keep you there. That's the trick and the danger.
Just remember: if you’re in the interrogation room, they don’t have enough evidence. If they can prove you committed a crime, you would be in the holding cell waiting to see the judge
That’s not true at all. I’ve been instructed from my supervisors to get a video statement from any and every felony arrest where the defendant does not lawyer up. It can help a strong and a weak case. Just because you’re being interrogated does not necessarily mean it’s a weak case. Trust me. This is how it’s done in NYC. Additionally, here is why what you said is untrue. I’ve had cases where there was multiple witnesses who knew the guy (a confirmatory ID, which is much much stronger than a stranger ID, where there’s always the possibility of a mis-ID), caught on surveillance camera, caught on NYPD body camera, with the guy arrested holding the gun in his hand.. as close to a slam dunk as possible.. and I was still instructed to get a video statement from him every single time (so long as he didn’t lawyer up). This is because even if he denies everything, their statement can still put themselves at the scene, or eliminate the possibility of an alibi defense. Also, no offense, but criminals aren’t the most intelligent people. They think they can talk their way out of things. And they wind up sinking their own ship. And additionally, most importantly, it pidgeon holes them into a version of the events that they cannot deviate from at trial. So there are many benefits to getting a statement on camera, for a strong or weak case. Once you have his version recorded, he cannot change it at a later time at trial. Because any changed version will make their testimony inconsistent which opens them up to an “impeachment by inconsistent statement”. Also, getting a video statement from them 9 times out of 10 allows you to discover what defense they will be using at trial. And once it’s put on camera he does not have time to change or alter his version of the events. So there are many many many reasons to get a video statement from a perp. Both in strong and weak evidentiary cases.
@@aurartx8354 in that sense they don’t really care why you did it. They would be looking to obtain a confession from you. A confession plus video is a slam dunk trial. Not for nothing, we don’t really care “why” you did it. That’s subjective and hardly relevant.
There's something seriously messed up when you have to tell a person that's 100% innocent that they have to stay quiet when the police try to talk to them or else they could end up going to prison. Instead of making a confession the goal, how about priortizing getting the truth?
It wouldn't be efficient. Even if only 90%, of all accused people are actually guilty, this method is way faster than only looking after objective truth. Their goal is to build a solid enough case to determine the most likely scenario.
@@Bladings False positives diminish efficiency too. Not to mention the fact that speed is NOT of the essence. The suspect is caught. The time spent in court is because of procedure, not how hard it is to find the truth. These things are more complicated than that.
@@Bladings It sounds like a question then of do you want to get this done as quickly and conveniently as possible, or do you want it done right. Keep in mind how many innocent people have gone to prison over the years because of this "efficient" method.
My "favorite" thing about all of this is when you lie to the police it's a crime, but when they lie to you they're just doing what they were trained to do.
Not really. If you confess to a crime because they lied to you about details, then that will be used against you in court. If I lie to a cop and it’s found that what I said wasent true, that will be used against me in court. It’s one sided
They’re literally trying to do the right thing lmao it’s not like a criminal is going to confess by saying pls, idk why you have a problem with investigators doing their job
We were told in the academy we could lie to suspects, bluff them, use scare tactics to intimidate them. Law enforcement in the USA today isn't about seeking justice. Its about controlling the population. Not doing the right thing.
@@weasel9062 I'm happy to say that this is not how police work everywhere! Here, the police are NOT allowed to lie to you about evidence - or at all! Besides, although the confession can help the investigation, it will never be proof!. A false confession can turn the investigation in the wrong direction if the police believe it. A confession or a witness statement can never stand alone! Back it up with real technical evidence.
Is this supposed to be an anti-cop comment? If so...it's pretty daft. There is a major difference between getting a confession, and a false confession. When only 1% of confessions end up being false confessions...that's a pretty good 'win' rate. And with criminal science getting better and better every day...many people can be proven innocent with evidence if they give a false confession. But I guess we can start forgetting about criminal science since all of these dummies want to defund the police. So now we'll just start seeing people locked up for no reason more often. Perhaps once you have a major crime done to you or your family...you'll magically 'get' why detectives and interrogations exist. Equally so, instead of doing what we do and the rest of the civilized world does...we could just start doing what 70% of the other chunk of the world does within their interrogations...physical and mental torture. But hey, Americas cops are so big bad and evil...am I right?!
I've seen it in movies and assumed it's true. If they had all the evidence they needed for a conviction, they wouldn't be interrogating you, they'd simply arrest you.
Not exactly true, I have watched a lot of detective shows like the first 48 and even when they have their killer and evidence they usually try to get a confession to make the case even more solid.
Notice the subtle psychological things they do. Put you in a small room, in the corner, table pushed against you, interrogator on each side. You’re boxes in. Wall behind you, to your left, interrogator, and table on your right, another one in front. And they always have more than one, to make you feel ganged up on.
actually most of the time what you're supposed to do is make them feel relaxed so instead you're supposed to seat them near the door (my source is the former spy-catcher/body language analyst that was on Wired)
Check out JCS channel that hes given a link for. That really was an innocent guy. The other examples are of actual murderers. JCS really shows it well. But videos are longer.
@@jessicastern8597 some people think faster, some slower. Some use logic thinking, some imaginative or “feeling”. Hence, some jokes are obvious to you right away, some are not, to other people with the other type of thinking it is the other way around. Read “thinking fast and slow” about neuroscience, amazing book, then you will have more compassion towards people that have a different brain and won’t be as judgmental that they don’t understand the jokes you do :) It helped me at least cause I used to judge and get annoyed at slower people than me, but then I understood that I have an extremely fast scanning brain, which has its upsides and downsides (for instance I get bored easily if not properly engaged and it’s harder for me to stay on the same task for too long.) while people with slower brain are amazing divers and they can sit and do the same thing and enjoy it without much engagement, which is very useful in our world. I hope this makes it clearer for you
1 pretend to be your ally, to make you feel comfortable (e.g. Bring coffee etc.) 2 positive confrontation: they let you know you are guilty and ask why (false proofs: witnesses, video, dna, prints) 3 shut down denials immediately to break your confidence, create feeling that you can't modify the idea of you being guilty 4 minimization of crime to let you confess (e. G. everybody would have done the same in that situation etc ) plus alternative questions (e.g. Is this how you Want to be remembered by your kids? Or: did your father done it? Or: it could have been an accident..)
@@TheBelrick That is absolutely true. It is, however, extremely difficult to ask for an attorney by shutting your mouth completely. If you don't ask for an attorney, they'll just keep you in interrogation, asking you questions, indefinitely. If you aren't under arrest, you shouldn't be there anyway. If you are under arrest, you should request an attorney and THEN remain silent.
If you put enough pressure on someone they will say anything to get themselves out of a situation. People get flustered when being kidnapped and held by a large gang.
If that ever is your situation just remember when you get falsely locked up, there's going to be way worse people and you aren't getting out of that situation.
People have been trained to believe that if you’re innocent, you don’t need a lawyer. You MUST be hiding something….you should be doing everything in your power to help law enforcement, if you didn’t do anything wrong 🥴 Absolute malarkey! Law enforcement cares about closing cases, not so much whether they have the right person.
How often? When ever the accused replies It's not rocket science people: Identify yourself , yes Invoke your right to remain silent . Maybe say 'lawyer' That's it,
@@antonyka-pra-ra just saying "lawyer" does not actually invoke your legal right to a lawyer. If you ask incorrectly, or in a way that can be twisted, then your request can be ignored. Phrase the request instead as "I invoke my legal right to a lawyer, and am demanding a lawyer." Or something equally clear and un-twistable.
Especially if someone murders your wife, kidnaps your child, steals your gold coin collection or burns your house down, never talk to police investigators, lawyer or no lawyer. Miranda set the standard for you, so take advantage of it by keeping your mouth shut. Winning his case before the Supreme Court kept him out of jail and on the streets where he got knifed to death.
@@Kagemusha08 Is it OK for an eye witness or a victim to talk to police? If not, is that to protect them from the cops, or the other people in their neighborhood?
I’ll always remember what my lawyer professor said to me in class: Most police don’t care if they convict the person who committed the crime, they just want a conviction for the crime. That’s why you shut up and ask for your lawyer.
It's literally their job. Just like the attorney's job is to get you out, regardless of whether you're guilty or not. Very few people understand this, but there are incentives at play that have nothing to do with justice. And that's ok! Having both sides represented fairly gives us a better chance of reaching the correct verdict.
@@Cowtymsmiesznego If the cops only care about getting a conviction and your level of defense largely depends on whether or not you can afford a good lawyer, how do poor people get fairly represented?
@@potatoking2217 Arguably, there's no guarantee that the cops or the prosecutor are any good either. For a lot of cases, there is a state prosecutor and a state attorney, which you could say is "fair". But of course it's not always the case - I'd say that absolutely if the state really wants a conviction, or they are up against rich people who can afford expensive lawyers, poor people are at a disadvantage. Needless to say, this is still much better than not having attorneys at all and having to "trust" one side of the proceeding.
even if you know you're innocent and you just want to provide helpful information, NEVER talk with them. they're never on your side. their ultimate goal is ALWAYS to get a confession
@@lachlanchester8142 It’s a good idea if you didn’t do it, too. Did you even watch the video and see how cops can use psychological manipulation to get a false confession out of an innocent person?
@@captainahab5522 I think that’s why a lot of suspects being interrogated stay. They think they are smarter then the detectives and want the police to think they are helping with the investigation. From what I see in these videos is during interrogation of someone, the guilty will usually talk about everything that doesn’t really matter in the investigation. I see it a lot they will have the suspect taking about how they were doing a week before the murder and they get long detailed answers but once you get to the actual crime, the suspect won’t give any information on what happened that day. He somehow forgot.
The four magic steps to not spend the night in jail: 1. Do not talk to the police 2. Do not talk to the police 3. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE 4. DO ask for a lawyer and to be immediately dismissed
So, there's really only one step. Tell them you want an attorney. Telling the police that you want an attorney is very difficult to do if you don't talk to the police.
Same with 'To be honest...' I once heard a judge freak out when someone said that. He said: 'I hate when people say that. Why do you have to say you are going to be honest if you are? It makes me question you.'
@@tarawalsh-arpaia3928 If the following sentence is an uncommon opinion or an embarrassing fact for the speaker, it might be true. "To be honest, I had drunk too much. I'm ashamed." It can also be a way to hide something even worse, but we should not see evil everywhere.
This jerk was a customer of mine, if you want to call it that. During breakfast all he did was tear my company apart and say, he wouldn't be able to keep his branch open with our products and prices. later that year, I was with another customer at a Sushi restaurant and this guy walked in and we both knew him. The guy I was with said oh, there is Mister X, he is a real nice guy. Then as we left and walked by him and said our hello's, the guy with me said he is a nice guy again as we left.
When talking to police, all you should say is "I want an attorney" Police: hey how are you doing? Suspect: I want an attorney Police: We just want to talk to you Suspect: I want to talk to my attorney Police: Can I get you a cup of coffee? Suspect: You can get me my attorney
I completely agree. Perhaps we can add a qualifier?: Except maybe during a minor traffic stop when you’re just going to pay the ticket and get on with life anyway. No need to put them on edge. Lawyer up fast if the conversation goes anywhere other than the reason they give first for having pulled you over. ESPECIALLY if it goes toward looking in your car for any reason at all. They should carry their own tissues, they have no right to look, and you have no obligation to consent, so that’s when OP’s wisdom comes into play. The attorney will explain to them why you’re not giving them the opportunity to plant anything, which the good apples will actually understand. Only the bad cops will be pissed at being denied that opportunity, right?
Thanks for the info, I'll be sure to do that. Small question though : I'm 80 and my parents are dead, so when they bring their corpses to me, will they do something about their smell?
The case of the police lying during interrogation is special to the USA. I haven't looked into for other countries but in Sweden the police cannot lie during the interrogation (ie make up evidence, witnesses etc). And I would be very surprised if you could do it in the other Nordic countries or Northern Europe (Germany etc).
@@uhhhhname9414 i don't think he should be fired, the guy didn't go to jail. But the demotion was rightly deserved for faking information when he didn't really know the guy was the actual suspect
I read something about Prosecutors who do the same and even when there's clear evidence that the person is innocent they'll still push to get them in trouble because they want 'the win'
All you have to do is say you want an attorney, then they will stop questioning you until your attorney is present. If attorneys refuse to turn over any exculpatory evidence, they can be disbarred and go to jail.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 #1. A recent Supreme Court ruling made it more complicated. Look it up. #2. Sure, they CAN get in trouble, but outside of a few high profile cases where the prosecutor got caught and was nationally shamed, nothing happens. It gets worse: I went to a jury selection 2 years ago. The prosecutor straight up asked the prospective jurors if they would be willing to convict with no witnesses and no evidence, because she didn't have any witnesses or evidence. She admitted that the only thing she had was the testimony of a cop who was taking the side of the so-called injured party. Everyone she asked said yes, they would be willing to convict only on the say-so of a cop who didn't witness anything. My first thought was how many blow jobs he got for it, and second, wtf? No witnesses, no evidence, but these yahoos are willing to send some poor sod to prison for years, just because. You think YOU'RE a nihilist? Hold my beer.
@@edennis8578 You expect me to believe that during voir dire a prosecuting attorney said that and the defense attorney said nothing? The judge said nothing? How did they even get an indictment with no evidence and no witnesses? What country was this in, because it certainly wasn't in the United States. What you are describing is it no way based in reality. If an attorney said that in court, the case would be summarily dismissed.
Derek van Schaik has a really good video that goes into depth about the little things like that that Chris said, as well as body language analysis. You should see the look on Chris’s face when a deputy behind him gets on his radio. No link, sorry, but easily searched in yt.
It's a tough situation, and I agree about false convictions, but leaving all the criminals go to prevent one false conviction is clearly a losing viewpoint. You end up with 99 victims without justice, and most likely dozens of new victims from the freed criminals recidivism. I don't know how one would justify more victims rather than less.
@@imnotabotrlyimnot I agree with you. I get the point the comment is trying to make but objectively it’s better that 99 criminals are behind bars than 99 criminals getting to be free just so that 1 instance doesn’t happen. Also, there are other ways innocent people can be convicted. They can be framed or set up by the true perpetrator, doing so in a way that tampers with physical evidence (which is supposed to be a super reliable form of evidence). So like, as sad as it is, I believe it’s almost impossible for innocent people to never be falsely charged. If the hypothetical 99 people are murderous criminals, it’s just safer for society that they aren’t free at the cost of one innocent person being in jail
You are completely correct. This is a biblical notion. That it is better for a man to be potentially released that is guilty of a crime than an innocent man convicted falsely of a crime. A lot of the world has forgotten this, and also that while we must strive for justice in this world, those who are guilty of evil will still face judgement of that evil when they die and will reap the due consequence.
"You have the right to remain silent" "You have the right to talk to a lawyer" These rights are here to protect you no matter whether you're innocent or guilty. So why not use them?
They interrogated my innocent cousin for abusing his son when it was really his ex girlfriend. She actually got her children taken away while he was in prison, but she didn't get locked up. The video file of the interrogation was said to be corrupted. My cousin said they kept trying to force him to admit his guilt and wouldn't listen to him. They said he did but he says they lied. Also he's illiterate, I bet they took advantage of that. Sounds fishy to me.
As someone who has suffered emotional abuse, watching this was so terrifying. The tricks and process is basically the same and I'm many ways, identical
The reason is because in both cases manipulation is used. However, in an emergency or crisis situation, things that would normally be considered unacceptable are permitted to save lives and mitigate damage.
@@Optim40 Because when psychological torture is used, it can trick the brain into believing things that aren't true. It is how psychological abusers trick their victims into thinking they deserve the abuse. With police interrogations, these tactics are necessary most often, because it gets the guilty to confess. But, I'm just saying that it can unintentionally obtain false confessions as well.
"The door isn't locked and whenever you want to leave Teresa will let you out..." -The ony proper response to this is "Thank you for your time and do you have a to go cup for my coffee." ;)
The fifth amendment says you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself and protect you against self-incrimination. If they come the next day with a warrant you could possibly make it seem like they’re trying to frame you
Here's what you need to do: ask "Am i being detained?" if they say no walk away. If they say yes respond to everything they say with "Give me a lawyer". Say nothing else. Do not 'ask' for a lawyer. Do not ask if they think you need a lawyer. Do not listen to them tell you what demanding a lawyer means for you. Speak with confidence and DEMAND a lawyer without a single doubt in their mind that you will bend on the subject. NEVER confess to anything. It doesn't matter if you're standing there holding onto a knife that is still sticking out of someones chest and they are playing HD video of you stabbing the guy who banged your wife. There's no need to rush.
@@iamURHO Because of the number of innocent people who have been tricked, coerced, bullied into a confession. For each person who it made to confess when they are innocent, not only is their life ruined but it can also mean murders are out there walking around free.
Never EVER consent to a police interrogation. Also when a suspect refuses to do so, and lawyers up instead, do not automatically consider him suspicious or guilty. He might just be smart. 🤷♀️
I learned from RUclips and tv shows what I have to do in this situation. 1. Am I under arrest or free to go? A: Call a lawyer and remain SILENT. B: Walk away.
Same here. There's more truth on RUclips than on mainstream TV with all the political agendas journalists get paid to tell to suit a specific narrative in their favour. They don't care about he truth.
Those false confessions hurt my heart cause really, what are you supposed to do? You keep proclaiming your innocence and they use these methods on you.
Ummm maybe just leave the room and walk away? A better question is, if you are innocent, and they say you can leave whenever you want, why stay there? Obviously they don't really have certain evidence against you or you would already be arrested.
@@therealrickytan rather sit in jail for a few months and go to trial to beat the case with a lawyer rather than say the wrong thing and go to prison for my whole life
Always: "Anything you say may be held *against* you in court" Never: "Anything you say may *help* you in court." Talking to cops is a no-win. Everything that comes out of your mouth will make things worse, not better.
The fact they're holding you in a questioning room shows they have no case. Getting you to confess shortcuts their investigative work. Lawyer up and make them prove your guilt. You are presumed innocent under the law.
Or you can be a good method actor and do a character that’s completely coo coo. Like lay on the floor with one leg on the wall and tell them you’ll only talk if you can smell their armpit. When/if they let you, change up the rules on them and say something like, “nvm you don’t look enough like my boy teddy roosevelt” And don’t answer any questions from within the framework they establish
If I got wrongfully convicted of murdering my parents and subsequently spent 17 years in prison, I'd be going back 6 months later for murdering the detective who coersed the false confession out of me
@@novacorponline If you do not educate yourself , your children or family, I WILL blame you for your willful ignorance of your rights. Its sad that homegrown citizens CHOOSE to be so ignorant of their rights while immigrants to this country study, embrace and exercise their new found rights. If you don't want to exercise your rights, don't try to play the victim card with me. Trained interrogators have NO power when you say " I don't answer questions. I want a lawyer".
This is a simplistic explanation. Interrogators often use a variety of techniques in various order. Or of the interrogator is a seasoned vet they've more than likely created their own routine
Same tactics as car dealerships, “get you a coffee” “let me talk to my boss”, salesman is bad cop/finance manager is good cop, a simple transaction takes 4-5 hours so you start to get fatigued and give them whatever they ask just so you can get out of there.
I've experienced it the other way, too; in my case, the salescreature and I had agreed on a price and when he got back from getting it "signed off" it went up. Just sixty dollars, but I was so incensed at the duplicity, I nixed the deal.
Super interesting. Also, it's odd that law enforcement is allowed, encouraged, trained to lie, deceive, coerce, mislead.... And they all have "integrity" on their car.
The US has a third world country when it comes to law enforcement. Their cops are trigger-happy amateurs compared to the police in the EU. In the EU the police are not allowed to lie and no one gets thrown into jail on confession alone. The courts can and will declare you innocent if there's no evidence against you, even if you confessed. That is done precisely to protect the innocent from being pressured to give false confessions.
@@michaelkatz7862 I work as a wildlife biologist but our game wardens do this, are trained to turn rumors (with zero evidence) into confessions. They lie all the time, "we've already got you bud, but if you work with us....". If you don't think it's a thing look into false confessions coerced by police or keep looking up interrogation tactics. It's really not a secret. They are literally trained to be deceivers.
@@rupertmedford3901 i agree, except, the goal isn't a false confession, but a true confession. It is a mind game for sure. The ethics is what i commented on. Not the apparent procedure. The "misleading" wss accepted by the US Supreme court in Oregon vs Mathiason in the 1970s. Getting a confession saying his fingerprints were found at the scene. Rumors are a lead and have solved murders and cold cases. Innocent people don't confess. Unless there's underlying mental issues. You know that in major publicized crimes many of the "usual suspects" will confess. No DA takes a case based on confession alone. But also, working with those in the field is not the same as working in the field. Even among cops there are braggarts. All investigators are trained to find the facts. AND what is behind the facts. A false confession is not factual. Using manipulation is not the same as creating something. With Miranda warnings, it's amazing how many still confess. Keep in mind, if you were the guys supervisor and knew he made up stuff, how could you trust him on anything. Supervisory or personal. I'd get rid of him fast. Once a cop lies on the stand, word spreads fast among judges. No one likes to be bamboozled.
I liked your comment but to a *degree.* In my years of working with the public, I've learned how easily so many people lie to your face. I do not imagine a guilty suspect to suddenly be quite open and honest. So I both understand the psych-tactics to get to the guilty but also wish the innocent could simply remember (in the trauma of the moment) to *remain silent w/o a lawyer present!* The goal is to find the guilty. If you are convinced you have that person, of course you'll focus on them. Still, it behooves to consider the possibility of error. The mess is not the system but the flaws of human nature (IMHO).
I think at the time it was probably unknown or even the algorithm was not written. Even now, I've seen deep fakes, and they're not that convincing. It's probably still pretty easy to analyze video footage to prove it's fake.
That's not how deepfakes works. Deepfakes would work better on celebrities because the A.I has tons of source to work with. Unless you have tons of HD videos of you in a good ligthing condition and various angles, in a close up, etc. Deepfake is hard to do on some random person.
@@mister_stiff you ever seen to catch a predator? Why do they interview every single one of them with the chats confession to Chris and showing up. And they interview everyone because they don’t have enough evidence for any conviction???
In Australia respond “no comment” till your lawyer arrives, your lawyer can establish what case they have against you, (police could just be fishing for information) plus if you have not been charged then leave the police station.
It's actually the 6th amendment: "guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer..." read the book "You have the right to remain innocent."
@@Gnomezonbacon they already do. It's called the media. If the authoritarians really want you locked up, they will utilize the media to create a smear campaign against you and make it a high profile case where the juror pool has already decided whether you're innocent or not before the trial even begins. See Kenosha Kyle for example.
@@JimboRustles Police will get punished for putting proven innocent people away, so please explain why you find it so mandatory to insult someone for asking a question.
a narc is a narcissist, so they're talking about abuse from a narcissist significant other or parent. And "survivor" is apparently now used to describe having lived through any kind of trauma. I don't think it's the right word to use, as it invites ridicule and doesn't serve it's purpose anymore to distinguish between actually life-threatening situations and other traumatic events, but it IS used for these kinds of issues.
Also, please notice the priority of the conditions. There a much-abused fable in the US that "Innocent people don't need lawyers" which is code for, "If you ask for a lawyer, we, who were thinking you could be innocent, will know for sure you're guilty." In fact, the police ALWAYS hope to convict you; that's why you were arrested. So if you're innocent, you ESPECIALLY need a lawyer.
Prisons are housing a lot of innocent people right now. The system is so broken and it's in no small part because police are legally allowed to lie to you. Many people have literally spent their lives in prison for crimes they didn't commit. Innocent people have even been executed. And before you say it's the price we have to pay to have a justice system, consider this: When an innocent is wrongfully convicted or executed, there are actually multiple injustices being committed, because a) the original victim did not get justice, b) the wrongfully convicted gets INjustice, c) their families suffer through all of this, and d) the real perpetrator is still at large perhaps even committing other crimes and victimizing other people.
The problem is that they want convictions more than the actual truth. So these BS psychological tactics that only get the naiive criminals and innocent that don’t try to get a lawyer are picking up more innocent than guilty.
Do. Not. Talk. To. The. Police.
Guilty OR innocent. You need a lawyer.
Even when you get pulled over for speeding?
@@marcialoseslobo5029 Many youtube videos on that.
@@marcialoseslobo5029 give them license and rego. Don’t small talk, ask if you’re detained when he starts talking about other subjects
What if im a lawyer in the first place?
@@sometimesyougottagoforward3671 I like you.
My dad was a cop for 25 years, and he told me if I’m ever in trouble with the police, don’t talk to them.
Same with my sister who is a police officer! Police officers of integrity usually advise their loved ones not to deal with police because many are scummy as hell.
Wow. That’s pretty revealing isn’t it. Your dad seems to know he worked with some bad dudes. It takes a bad dude to put a guy in prison who’s not guilty.
@JTC no, you shouldn't go to the officers home to confront or discuss because then it is a threat to the family
@JTC there is no similarity to the bully. And usually bullying victims go to the school, etc, not to the bully 's parents! And your anecdotal experience with law enforcement pales in comparison to those of us who lived it for our career. It's like me having a bad experience with a black mugger, and condeming all black people as being criminal and alike. Duh. Also, a criminal accomplishes nothing good coming to my home to confront my family. My wife doesn't control me. Dept regulations, the law, and the courts do. Bullying cops get found out and fired or harassed by their dept. Criminal cops get prosecuted. That's not to say that innocent cops don't get tarred with a false Reputation by a zealous news media. I've seen that numerous times. It's the damned of you do, damned if you don't, scenario. Judging any human activity by the exception rather than the rule cheats them and you.
My uncle was a criminal defense attorney and a law school professor. When I was a freshman and decided to go to the same college that he taught at he basically told me the same thing but he added call him first.
1. Remain silent.
2. Request a lawyer.
3. If in doubt, see 1.
I like the 3rd point
Actually, that's not right. It should be:
1. Request a lawyer
2. Do not answer any questions
3. If in doubt, see 1
How am I supposed to request a lawyer while remaining silent?
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 pass them a card with your lawyers details on
@@RossTheNinja You carry a card with your lawyer's details on it? When you travel out of state, where your lawyer probably can't practice law, the first thing you do is get an attorney's card with his information in case you need it? I guess you have already done that, so you carry around a big stack of lawyer's business cards, so this information clearly is not for you.
@@freeottis What could an attorney possibly say that would get you in trouble?
What if a meteor crashed through the roof and hit you in the head?
When I was 12 I was home alone and someone tried to break into my house. It was a fairly passive attempt (whoever it was ran off after seeing me inside), but I was scared enough to call the police.
They showed up and went looking around my neighborhood. The neighbors two doors down were not completely clean so the father took off into the back woods leaving his son behind in the house. The officers went into that house (notably without a warrant or good cause) and found the boy hiding in a closet. They called me in to identify him.
That teenage boy was crying and terrified. The police told me that he had confessed to trying to break in to my home. That kid was obviously scared enough to confess to the Lincoln and JFK assassinations. He didn't match the description I had given them, and I told them that. They acted like I was suddenly lying to them. Fortunately, I held my ground and told them firmly this kid was innocent.
Glad I wasn't used to wrongfully imprison a teenager.
Okay this is pretty good
Wow thats actually crazy Im proud of you for standing your ground and telling them the truth.
Wow, is police like that all over the world? I had a somewhat similar experience when I was called to the police station to identify my robber. Considering that I saw the guy's face several inches from mine and he was young and very blond, they were showing me a much older guy with dark hair. And gosh they tried to make me say that it was him.
It was scary. It's like I was guilty of something when in reality they just didn't want to do their job.
Lol @ Lincoln and JFK confessions
Shame on you for letting JFK's killer walk.
From a police officer:
"Never talk to the police even if you're innocent because anything you say can be used as evidence against you. Invoke your right to the 5th amendment (this is not an admittance of guilt) and request a lawyer.
I keep that advice to heart
@JJM thanks didn't catch that, I was typing in a hurry for some reason
Absolutely, I need a lawyer, mouthed closed!!
@Chris King Further, "the right to remain silent" isn't nearly as absolute as many people think.
@@Tim85-y2q When you're being questioned by police, it absolutely is absolute.
Me, someone with potential ASPD: Interesting, good to know :)
Reminder: do NOT talk to police. Ask for a lawyer, and shut up.
Thank you, sir.
most of the time there isn't a choice. Either talk or get shot
why ask just say nothing
If a person with a gun wants to murder you, we're talking about a totally different situation than a recorded conversation in a police station.
@IAm Moana *sigh*
My lawyer is a humble guy. He told me if I ever talk to police about anything, without him present, he will kick my teeth out. I think it might be pretty serious advise to not talk to police even when you're innocent.
😂
Lmao
Beaing a policeman is like being a criminal "for the greater good"...but you're also a criminal, in the end.
@@drjp4212 If lying is legal to trigger a confession than how does it make them criminal?
@@danielarthur2915 because even an innocent person can end up confessing and going to jail.
Remember my first encounter with these dirty tricks was getting into big trouble at school and the teachers would say ‘all your friends have already told us what happened’ even though they hadn’t, worked an absolute treat
I had no friends at school, so it wouldn't work on me.
your parents already told us what happened
the janitor told US what happened
Remember.. You have the right to remain silent. When they tell you that you are allowed to leave whenever you want to leave... LEAVE QUIETLY AND QUICKLY.
True
Are you really allowed to leave? How does that work?
@@camello321 When someone says that you have the right to remain silent... take that advice.... when they say that you are allowed to leave because you are not under arrest.... you most certainly are allowed to leave so the only thing to do is.... leave. They are skilled at trapping people into saying and doing things that help them out with their investigation and that’s not your responsibility... translation is: shut your mouth and kindly leave because it’s your right. Never let go of your rights because that’ll mean you’re losing your freedom.
@@JH-bf7be thanks for explaining man apreciate it👍
@@JH-bf7be This needs to be on a billboard somewhere.
It breaks my heart when I think about how many innocent people are sitting in prison after being tricked into confessing to crimes they didn't commit.
Ya, unfortunately investigators often want an arrest more than the truth
Yeah they did it to me 2 years ago, still awaiting a trial but I got lucky they didn’t arrest me…
@@nicholasdoyle5350 really omg I hope things go well for you you have my prayers
I makes me very, very angry
That’s the issue with interrogation. You have no idea why you are there and being told, not asked, told that you murdered someone is a shock. And most people brains just kinda misfire and they will do whatever the police want for it to be over.
"youre obviously not under arrest today. Anytime you feel like you want to leave here, feel free to do so.."
"Ok Bye"
Yeah, they won't like that.
@@locutusdborg126 good
Seriously, I would have left right then.
@@DevinFlake and that would have also been the right thing to do, honestly
I mean, if you could leave at any time you wanted, how did you even get there in the first place? Do not go to the police station unless they arrest you.
I never understood why a suspect never decides to just end the interrogation by getting up and leaving the building, the agents literally tell them they’re free to leave anytime.
Because that's not completely true. They make you feel like you cant go anywhere
They're aftaid that leaving makes them look guilty.
Maybe that is just another lie they legally can tell
My best guess is to make you feel comfortable ny giving you an easy-out, and the masochistic epistemology inside you says "It can't be that easy".
You can leave but they’ll immediately go to the judge for a warrant for arrest.
None of these taped conversations should have ever happened because the only thing you should ever say when questioned by the police is, "I want an attorney."
I'm useless right now at law terminologies and would like something cleared up. What's the difference between a lawyer and an attorney?
@@steviebro0538 No difference, it's the same thing.
@@steviebro0538 they are spelled and pronounced differently
Any more tips?
And they will say "only someone guilty would say that". But that should leave you unphased because unless they can prove something that statement doesn't mean anything.
Remember: the safe word is "lawyer"
Better still, bring your lawyer along.....
Its interesting, because lawyer is a double edged sword. If you ask for a lawyer people may think you're hiding something💁♂️ still asking for a lawyer is the best thing for you if you're guilty or innocent.
Cop: So are you single or...
Me: * outside of Starbucks * Lawyer
@@KingSlayer_. It doesn't matter what people think, it only matters what they can prove.
@@letterl1840 😜👌
innocent confessed due to lying of police and spent 17 years in prison .. What a disaster and shame for police.
Haven’t you heard? It’s just a few bad apples! Nothing to worry about
Shame on the judge.
Black people: "First time?"
That’s why you never speak to the police
@@operationlull3742 You just want anarchy, so it wouldn't matter anymore that you can't write.
Everyone should always remember that it’s their job to prove that you’re guilty not prove your innocence
What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
@@Orangecatenergy that’s a lie your guilty until proven innocent
@@Orangecatenergy Thats the job of the court, not the police.
it goes against constitution; so they can be demanded in the exact time they say that.
When they said to that man "We are 100% sure ur guilty". He could just reply "Then why am i still sitting here? " Checkmate
That's savage bro though i think it can possibly be perceived as a confession.
checkmate is not saying anything
Man: Would a lawyer think so?
Police: Yes
Man: Then I want one before I continue.
1:50 thats basically what he meant by "so if im on the video camera...?"
@@seriousclown4139 no it cannot lmfao. A confession has to be a confession. Words can’t be twisted around and used as a confession, that defeats the whole purpose.
What OP is saying that if they actually have you on video, they wouldn’t waste their time trying to get a confession because a video is open and shut evidence
As George Washington said
― “It's better to offer no excuse than a bad one.”
Let’s get Presidential
@@fuccboisanchez6506 lol
Perfect quote!
HOW TRUE.
It's even better to say, I need my lawyer
Imagine lying to a 17yo kid who just lost his mother that his own father identified him as the killer. It's no wonder the police are so rarely viewed kindly in the community. They just want to send someone to prison. It's a bonus if they're actually guilty.
You're assumption about the police and there ultimate goal seems a bit misguided. There are those police officers who will lock anyone up as long as it benefits them in a personal sense but to define all police officers under the same umbrella is not only dangerous but ignorant.
@@whome6415 Well when you figure out a way to tell the good from the bad let me know because they've all got the same uniform. Until then, I'm going to smile and nod and not trust a word they say.
@@hooliganbubsy7298 Have you been a "victim" of law enforcement?
@@whome6415 No I've just had bad experiences.
Clearly you watch too much TV. Or listen to advicates. I've talked to defense attorneys who feel the DAs take every case that gets near them. But... 100% of defense atty clients in court are charged. Their perception is wrong when you look at all suspects in all cases. When a DA says "i know he probably did it, but I can't likely prove it in court, so I refuse the case" no defense attorney is bemoaning his innocent client being charged. Their perception is innaccurate. You might get rousted by cops 100 times. But you can't say that cops roust every one. Your experience is only you. Yet you blame the cop who reacts impoperly because all his minority contacts were negative against him, so he judges all minority contacts with caution or apprehension. If you do it, why be surprised when cops do it?
Having Chris Watts face in this “unfair interrogation” video is maybe not the best choice. He’s a monster
Agree
Put your sensitivity aside and understand that this is about interrogation techniques and how they are used by law enforcement personnel. This is clearly stated and the video used from his interrogation displayed this..it isn’t about Watts.
He is misunderstood
@@johnrick3508 No he is not.
The video wasn't focusing on Chris Watts. It was used as an example of interrogation.
If the cops really have enough evidence, they wouldn't need your confession!
Sometimes they do it for added evidence: see Dalia Dippolito
A confession can make the sentence heavier.
Good point King
Not really, sometimes they want to know where the bodies are like with Christopher
True
Wrongful incarceration is honestly my worst fear.
Just plead the 5th. And realize this, if police had concrete evidence against you, you'd most likely already be in handcuffs. The fact that they're so hell bent on a person confessing means they don't have anything and the only way you get trapped is if you confess. Just lawyer up
No kidding! Remember that YOU HAVE RIGHTS! Stay silent 😶
@@MandeepSingh-ki6ve what if the evidence is planted by the police or someone else? Saying Lawyer 50 times won’t help you then.
@@Dasanie then you'd be in handcuffs already. The fact that they're interrogating you for hours day in and day out most likely means they're only relying on your confession to put you in jail.
@@MandeepSingh-ki6ve or if they get a confession, their chances of getting you locked up his higher then fighting you in court and potentially having the falsified evidence discovered
My father is a retired police offer and taught me you never ever talk to the police if you are arrested and immediately ask for a lawyer. Even if they tell you oh you are staying here over night until we get you one. Nope that’s fine I’ll wait for my lawyer.
What's the first thing an LEO will do if suspected of wrong doing or violating policy? He gets his union lawyer! Cops are the biggest hypocrites, next to politicians.
What do you do if your innocent and stay a night in jail anyways? What do you do?
@@yayger825 bruh even if yu have to stay weeks never confess or talk to them yu could spend 50 years in jail just saying 1 sentence.
I wish I had a father or relative who told me this.
@@jackma3730 Except while in jail, just to keep yourself alive you may THEN end up having to do something that will give them a legitimate reason to now keep you there. That's the trick and the danger.
Just remember: if you’re in the interrogation room, they don’t have enough evidence. If they can prove you committed a crime, you would be in the holding cell waiting to see the judge
That’s not true at all. I’ve been instructed from my supervisors to get a video statement from any and every felony arrest where the defendant does not lawyer up. It can help a strong and a weak case. Just because you’re being interrogated does not necessarily mean it’s a weak case. Trust me. This is how it’s done in NYC.
Additionally, here is why what you said is untrue. I’ve had cases where there was multiple witnesses who knew the guy (a confirmatory ID, which is much much stronger than a stranger ID, where there’s always the possibility of a mis-ID), caught on surveillance camera, caught on NYPD body camera, with the guy arrested holding the gun in his hand.. as close to a slam dunk as possible.. and I was still instructed to get a video statement from him every single time (so long as he didn’t lawyer up).
This is because even if he denies everything, their statement can still put themselves at the scene, or eliminate the possibility of an alibi defense. Also, no offense, but criminals aren’t the most intelligent people. They think they can talk their way out of things. And they wind up sinking their own ship.
And additionally, most importantly, it pidgeon holes them into a version of the events that they cannot deviate from at trial. So there are many benefits to getting a statement on camera, for a strong or weak case. Once you have his version recorded, he cannot change it at a later time at trial. Because any changed version will make their testimony inconsistent which opens them up to an “impeachment by inconsistent statement”.
Also, getting a video statement from them 9 times out of 10 allows you to discover what defense they will be using at trial. And once it’s put on camera he does not have time to change or alter his version of the events.
So there are many many many reasons to get a video statement from a perp. Both in strong and weak evidentiary cases.
Not true cause they can have video evidence of you doing the crime and interview you to understand why you did it
@@aurartx8354 in that sense they don’t really care why you did it. They would be looking to obtain a confession from you. A confession plus video is a slam dunk trial. Not for nothing, we don’t really care “why” you did it. That’s subjective and hardly relevant.
Just like how an undercover cop has to tell you he’s a cop
@@stuffenjoyer2223 wait this is a joke right lol
There's something seriously messed up when you have to tell a person that's 100% innocent that they have to stay quiet when the police try to talk to them or else they could end up going to prison. Instead of making a confession the goal, how about priortizing getting the truth?
Exactly
In my country there is a talk but you will write down your officiql account, manipulation isn't part of the story.
It wouldn't be efficient. Even if only 90%, of all accused people are actually guilty, this method is way faster than only looking after objective truth. Their goal is to build a solid enough case to determine the most likely scenario.
@@Bladings False positives diminish efficiency too. Not to mention the fact that speed is NOT of the essence. The suspect is caught. The time spent in court is because of procedure, not how hard it is to find the truth. These things are more complicated than that.
@@Bladings It sounds like a question then of do you want to get this done as quickly and conveniently as possible, or do you want it done right. Keep in mind how many innocent people have gone to prison over the years because of this "efficient" method.
why do cops win?
they've done this before and this is your first time.
Rookie.
Unless you are Jeff
@@theother2166 that was his zeroeth time.
he wasn't guilty - so that's different.
but I hear you
Jeff is a legend.
@@theother2166 Jeff who?
@@kianhughes6309 Look up "The Legend of Jeff" on the channel "JCS - Criminal Psychology". It's a great watch.
@@kianhughes6309 Lmao that "Jeff who?" reminded me of Elon Musk
Props to JCS - Criminal Psychology for shining light on these intriguing stories!
YES!
One of the best RUclips’s!
They basically stole his content lol
@@dominikovesny907 They linked Criminal Psychology in their description ~
@@dominikovesny907 Yeah but this is a different topic and those interrogation videos are open for public
My "favorite" thing about all of this is when you lie to the police it's a crime, but when they lie to you they're just doing what they were trained to do.
It’s not illegal to lie to police it’s illegal to lie under oath
Bruh
Not really. If you confess to a crime because they lied to you about details, then that will be used against you in court. If I lie to a cop and it’s found that what I said wasent true, that will be used against me in court. It’s one sided
They’re literally trying to do the right thing lmao it’s not like a criminal is going to confess by saying pls, idk why you have a problem with investigators doing their job
@@giselefierros3522 You think it's their job to convince innocent people to confess to crimes they didn't commit?
Never trust anyone who’s comfortable lying to your face and when accused tells you it’s just their job oh, I see. You were just following orders
“I’ve been at the mercy of men just following orders. Never again.” -Magneto
We were told in the academy we could lie to suspects, bluff them, use scare tactics to intimidate them.
Law enforcement in the USA today isn't about seeking justice. Its about controlling the population. Not doing the right thing.
@@weasel9062 I'm happy to say that this is not how police work everywhere!
Here, the police are NOT allowed to lie to you about evidence - or at all!
Besides, although the confession can help the investigation, it will never be proof!.
A false confession can turn the investigation in the wrong direction if the police believe it.
A confession or a witness statement can never stand alone! Back it up with real technical evidence.
@@michaelbarletta1024 You beat me to it.
Is this supposed to be an anti-cop comment? If so...it's pretty daft. There is a major difference between getting a confession, and a false confession. When only 1% of confessions end up being false confessions...that's a pretty good 'win' rate. And with criminal science getting better and better every day...many people can be proven innocent with evidence if they give a false confession.
But I guess we can start forgetting about criminal science since all of these dummies want to defund the police. So now we'll just start seeing people locked up for no reason more often.
Perhaps once you have a major crime done to you or your family...you'll magically 'get' why detectives and interrogations exist.
Equally so, instead of doing what we do and the rest of the civilized world does...we could just start doing what 70% of the other chunk of the world does within their interrogations...physical and mental torture. But hey, Americas cops are so big bad and evil...am I right?!
I've seen it in movies and assumed it's true. If they had all the evidence they needed for a conviction, they wouldn't be interrogating you, they'd simply arrest you.
Depends which country you are in.
They might be trying to get a confession just so you can't do anything in court to lessen your sentence
APOLOGIZE, NO TV FOR ME. BOOKS AND RESEARCH. CLIPS FROM INTERNET.
@@krajic582 No TV. Clips from internet.
I'm typing this on the internet from my TV.
Not exactly true, I have watched a lot of detective shows like the first 48 and even when they have their killer and evidence they usually try to get a confession to make the case even more solid.
Notice the subtle psychological things they do. Put you in a small room, in the corner, table pushed against you, interrogator on each side. You’re boxes in. Wall behind you, to your left, interrogator, and table on your right, another one in front. And they always have more than one, to make you feel ganged up on.
actually most of the time what you're supposed to do is make them feel relaxed so instead you're supposed to seat them near the door (my source is the former spy-catcher/body language analyst that was on Wired)
That's when I tell them I'm claustrophobic and can they please give me my space, followed by. I have nothing to say, am I free to go now?
@@polyky Joe Navarro? Yeah, you’re right. When someone is relaxed, he/she has a better recall of what happened (whether he/she is guilty or innocent).
That room separates boys from men
@@casuallyplaying2553 yes! I'm bad with names
Four words to say to a cop: *"I want my lawyer."*
Exactly then your attorney does the talking
nah just one
"lawyer"
Or better yet "I demand a lawyer and invoke my fifth amendment right"
Haha I like the guy at 1:27 reacting to their lies. "We got witnesses" "Great!" "We got video camera." "Perfect!!"
Check out JCS channel that hes given a link for. That really was an innocent guy. The other examples are of actual murderers. JCS really shows it well. But videos are longer.
yet he still rotted in prison for over 2 years of his life for something he had no part of.
No he didnt
@@JudahMaccabee_ Three days, if I remember correctly, and the investigator was suspended without pay for that stunt.
@@JudahMaccabee_
He didn’t. He was in prison for 2-3 days and he won a lawsuit.
The Police: "Can we talk?"
Me: "Lawyer."
The police: Ca...
Me:Lawyer.
The Police: "Can we talk?"
Me:
🤐
Police: can we talk?
Me: to my lawyer. Blank stares
@@liquidsleepgames3661 The police : you want some soda?
@@michaelpetrovich5353 i'll take a liter of lawyer.
How do you know you have a good lawyer? On the way to the interview, she hands you a tube of super glue and says "here, have some lip gloss"
Well . . it took me about four or five re- readings, and then it finally sunk in...good one .
@Luvjeet SINGH mouth, shut.
That's a good one
Wow what’s hard to get about that joke lol seriously 😂
@@jessicastern8597 some people think faster, some slower. Some use logic thinking, some imaginative or “feeling”. Hence, some jokes are obvious to you right away, some are not, to other people with the other type of thinking it is the other way around. Read “thinking fast and slow” about neuroscience, amazing book, then you will have more compassion towards people that have a different brain and won’t be as judgmental that they don’t understand the jokes you do :) It helped me at least cause I used to judge and get annoyed at slower people than me, but then I understood that I have an extremely fast scanning brain, which has its upsides and downsides (for instance I get bored easily if not properly engaged and it’s harder for me to stay on the same task for too long.) while people with slower brain are amazing divers and they can sit and do the same thing and enjoy it without much engagement, which is very useful in our world. I hope this makes it clearer for you
1 pretend to be your ally, to make you feel comfortable (e.g. Bring coffee etc.)
2 positive confrontation: they let you know you are guilty and ask why (false proofs: witnesses, video, dna, prints)
3 shut down denials immediately to break your confidence, create feeling that you can't modify the idea of you being guilty
4 minimization of crime to let you confess (e. G. everybody would have done the same in that situation etc ) plus alternative questions (e.g. Is this how you Want to be remembered by your kids? Or: did your father done it? Or: it could have been an accident..)
All these tactics are easily defeated by shutting your mouth completely.
No, they are defeated by asking for an attorney.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 and the lawyer will tell you to: Shut your mouth. Tell the police nothing. the lawyer speaks to the police never yourself.
@@TheBelrick That is absolutely true. It is, however, extremely difficult to ask for an attorney by shutting your mouth completely. If you don't ask for an attorney, they'll just keep you in interrogation, asking you questions, indefinitely. If you aren't under arrest, you shouldn't be there anyway. If you are under arrest, you should request an attorney and THEN remain silent.
@Sounds Nice Yeah, you're going to jail
@Sounds Nice You mean like the kid in the video?
If you put enough pressure on someone they will say anything to get themselves out of a situation. People get flustered when being kidnapped and held by a large gang.
If that ever is your situation just remember when you get falsely locked up, there's going to be way worse people and you aren't getting out of that situation.
@@GTSN38 exactly. Either put up with verbal abuse from interrogators or put up with physical or even sexual abuse later from inmates
People have been trained to believe that if you’re innocent, you don’t need a lawyer. You MUST be hiding something….you should be doing everything in your power to help law enforcement, if you didn’t do anything wrong 🥴 Absolute malarkey! Law enforcement cares about closing cases, not so much whether they have the right person.
In some countries, they can beat you up for false confessions.
@@isitoveryet9525 Yea you want me behind bars you have to take me to court I’m not going to fall for this garbage I would call my lawyer
1. Request a lawyer
2. Do not answer any questions
3. If in doubt, see 1
Seems familiar...🤔
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 the more the merrier.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 its all good man
We value the tips from each and every felon. Thanks necrosis.
People are just saying this without even knowing why cause other people are lol
This is seriously effed up. Thanks for spreading awareness.
Oh, so that's why in the movies they always ask for a lawyer
And i thought the characters were just being arrogant
feels, I always was like thats an admission of guilt but now il do it in a heartbeat
Lmao
This legal lying is evil. Not everyone can afford a lawyer. How often do these lies “accidentally” find their way into the courtroom?
How often?
When ever the accused replies
It's not rocket science people:
Identify yourself , yes
Invoke your right to remain silent .
Maybe say 'lawyer'
That's it,
If you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you.
@@antonyka-pra-ra just saying "lawyer" does not actually invoke your legal right to a lawyer. If you ask incorrectly, or in a way that can be twisted, then your request can be ignored.
Phrase the request instead as "I invoke my legal right to a lawyer, and am demanding a lawyer." Or something equally clear and un-twistable.
@@AllisonGhost I invoke my 5th amendment right
@@samalander88 most of those are hired by the state and are against you
I don't know if I would survive 17 years in prison for a crime I did not commit... 😭😭😭
i definitely wouldn't
@@lyndsay369 cry little baby
Chump.
@@tallsz559 you think you could survive 17 years in prison ? Lmao heres a hint , you wouldn't .
@@tallsz559 You would be what's colloquially known as a "prison wife".
just burn the word “lawyer” into your brain and you’ll never be wrongly convicted of a crime. Even if you did do the crime.
If I did do the crime, how can I be wrongly convicted?!
@@uku5252 some lawyers are great and juries are convinced
@@uku5252 Because according to the law, a correct conviction is only the one that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
@@uku5252 😂😂👌
dont commit crimes though
It’s simple. Whether guilty or not. “I WANT MY LAWYER”
Especially if someone murders your wife, kidnaps your child, steals your gold coin collection or burns your house down, never talk to police investigators, lawyer or no lawyer. Miranda set the standard for you, so take advantage of it by keeping your mouth shut. Winning his case before the Supreme Court kept him out of jail and on the streets where he got knifed to death.
This x1000. Don't be rude about it but don't let the cops bully you or tell you anything else.
@@Reach41 he got knifed to death? For sure a sanctioned hitjob by the cartel of mobsters who hide in public offices.
@@jayyv5059 Either that or one of the street thugs who have so benefited from his Supreme Court case.
@@Kagemusha08 Is it OK for an eye witness or a victim to talk to police? If not, is that to protect them from the cops, or the other people in their neighborhood?
I’ll always remember what my lawyer professor said to me in class: Most police don’t care if they convict the person who committed the crime, they just want a conviction for the crime. That’s why you shut up and ask for your lawyer.
Disgusting
Nice people with badges who originally are supposed to serve the average person, to fight and protect us
It's literally their job. Just like the attorney's job is to get you out, regardless of whether you're guilty or not. Very few people understand this, but there are incentives at play that have nothing to do with justice. And that's ok! Having both sides represented fairly gives us a better chance of reaching the correct verdict.
@@Cowtymsmiesznego If the cops only care about getting a conviction and your level of defense largely depends on whether or not you can afford a good lawyer, how do poor people get fairly represented?
@@potatoking2217 Arguably, there's no guarantee that the cops or the prosecutor are any good either. For a lot of cases, there is a state prosecutor and a state attorney, which you could say is "fair". But of course it's not always the case - I'd say that absolutely if the state really wants a conviction, or they are up against rich people who can afford expensive lawyers, poor people are at a disadvantage.
Needless to say, this is still much better than not having attorneys at all and having to "trust" one side of the proceeding.
"You're not under arrest, you can walk out any time."
"Aight duces..."
i wonder what they would have done had he took the guy seriously
@@TheGeckoNinja Nothing, legally. There's video saying he's free to go.
Lol. I kept wondering why that guy didn't leave.
@@Carmi766 People think they are smart
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 Exactly, and police purposely prey on that by inflating their ego with flattery.
even if you know you're innocent and you just want to provide helpful information, NEVER talk with them. they're never on your side. their ultimate goal is ALWAYS to get a confession
Never go to the station for "questioning." If they want you to go, ask: "Am I under arrest?" If not don't go. Don't end up in that little room.
Well if you actually did it that’s a good idea
@@lachlanchester8142 It’s a good idea if you didn’t do it, too. Did you even watch the video and see how cops can use psychological manipulation to get a false confession out of an innocent person?
When they say you're free to go:
"Awesome, thanks. I'll be leaving now."
I’d stay for a bit to build a bit of trust with the cops then I would say thanks for the talk I’m leaving now
@@captainahab5522 I think that’s why a lot of suspects being interrogated stay. They think they are smarter then the detectives and want the police to think they are helping with the investigation. From what I see in these videos is during interrogation of someone, the guilty will usually talk about everything that doesn’t really matter in the investigation. I see it a lot they will have the suspect taking about how they were doing a week before the murder and they get long detailed answers but once you get to the actual crime, the suspect won’t give any information on what happened that day. He somehow forgot.
The likes where at 420 but I had to... I’ll rip one for you guys 🤧
The four magic steps to not spend the night in jail:
1. Do not talk to the police
2. Do not talk to the police
3. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE
4. DO ask for a lawyer and to be immediately dismissed
So, there's really only one step. Tell them you want an attorney. Telling the police that you want an attorney is very difficult to do if you don't talk to the police.
and may I add: do not talk to the fcking police.
@@jobob47 Good luck.
5: Defund them out of existence and replace them with publically elected accountable officials like the Sheriff's department.
@@russianbot4418 🙄
As a lawyer, the only four words you should say to the cops is: I WANT MY LAWYER.
When someone says "I'm not lying to you", it triggers an alarm. 🚨
Same with 'To be honest...' I once heard a judge freak out when someone said that. He said: 'I hate when people say that. Why do you have to say you are going to be honest if you are? It makes me question you.'
@@tarawalsh-arpaia3928 If the following sentence is an uncommon opinion or an embarrassing fact for the speaker, it might be true. "To be honest, I had drunk too much. I'm ashamed."
It can also be a way to hide something even worse, but we should not see evil everywhere.
I was thinking the same thing, that would’ve been the giveaway for me.
This jerk was a customer of mine, if you want to call it that. During breakfast all he did was tear my company apart and say, he wouldn't be able to keep his branch open with our products and prices.
later that year, I was with another customer at a Sushi restaurant and this guy walked in and we both knew him. The guy I was with said oh, there is Mister X, he is a real nice guy. Then as we left and walked by him and said our hello's, the guy with me said he is a nice guy again as we left.
"I swear to God," is another one.
When talking to police, all you should say is "I want an attorney"
Police: hey how are you doing?
Suspect: I want an attorney
Police: We just want to talk to you
Suspect: I want to talk to my attorney
Police: Can I get you a cup of coffee?
Suspect: You can get me my attorney
Or a phone call to get an attorney
Perfect 👌
I completely agree. Perhaps we can add a qualifier?:
Except maybe during a minor traffic stop when you’re just going to pay the ticket and get on with life anyway. No need to put them on edge. Lawyer up fast if the conversation goes anywhere other than the reason they give first for having pulled you over. ESPECIALLY if it goes toward looking in your car for any reason at all. They should carry their own tissues, they have no right to look, and you have no obligation to consent, so that’s when OP’s wisdom comes into play. The attorney will explain to them why you’re not giving them the opportunity to plant anything, which the good apples will actually understand. Only the bad cops will be pissed at being denied that opportunity, right?
Get me my attorney holding me a cup of coffee :D
@@goldeneagle3678 Perfect!
My parents always say to me “Don’t say anything to them, just say I want my parents and lawyer.” And I will remember it forever.
What did you do that they have to keep saying that to you? Just curious 😳
@@ayej26 I didn’t do anything but just in case I do get in trouble they tell me to ask for a lawyer.
Thanks for the info, I'll be sure to do that. Small question though : I'm 80 and my parents are dead, so when they bring their corpses to me, will they do something about their smell?
@@armorvil dunno. Pls try and update us. Thanks.
@@MrMathsimon I'll try, promised!
The case of the police lying during interrogation is special to the USA. I haven't looked into for other countries but in Sweden the police cannot lie during the interrogation (ie make up evidence, witnesses etc). And I would be very surprised if you could do it in the other Nordic countries or Northern Europe (Germany etc).
**Moves to Sweden**
The innocent guy’s interrogator actually got demoted for his actions during that interrogation.
Really
@@homerogarzajr1787 jcs criminal psychology good channel been hooked on it for days
@@rangeman209 Thx for LMK
Demoted? Shouldn't he be fired? Wtf
@@uhhhhname9414 i don't think he should be fired, the guy didn't go to jail. But the demotion was rightly deserved for faking information when he didn't really know the guy was the actual suspect
Once they have their suspect, interrogators will do anything to get 'the win'.
I read something about Prosecutors who do the same and even when there's clear evidence that the person is innocent they'll still push to get them in trouble because they want 'the win'
All you have to do is say you want an attorney, then they will stop questioning you until your attorney is present.
If attorneys refuse to turn over any exculpatory evidence, they can be disbarred and go to jail.
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 #1. A recent Supreme Court ruling made it more complicated. Look it up. #2. Sure, they CAN get in trouble, but outside of a few high profile cases where the prosecutor got caught and was nationally shamed, nothing happens. It gets worse: I went to a jury selection 2 years ago. The prosecutor straight up asked the prospective jurors if they would be willing to convict with no witnesses and no evidence, because she didn't have any witnesses or evidence. She admitted that the only thing she had was the testimony of a cop who was taking the side of the so-called injured party. Everyone she asked said yes, they would be willing to convict only on the say-so of a cop who didn't witness anything. My first thought was how many blow jobs he got for it, and second, wtf? No witnesses, no evidence, but these yahoos are willing to send some poor sod to prison for years, just because. You think YOU'RE a nihilist? Hold my beer.
@@edennis8578 You expect me to believe that during voir dire a prosecuting attorney said that and the defense attorney said nothing? The judge said nothing? How did they even get an indictment with no evidence and no witnesses? What country was this in, because it certainly wasn't in the United States. What you are describing is it no way based in reality. If an attorney said that in court, the case would be summarily dismissed.
They prefer 'the win' to the right guy or the truth.
I feel like I'm cheating on JCS by being here right now. I'ma see myself out.
i felt the same haha
Ahahahaha so true
haha
😂😂😂
JCS doesn't put out enough. A man has needs.
My Dad's a retired sheriff here in Texas. Even he says, do NOT talk to police other than to ask for your attorney to be present for any questioning.
Notice how Chris says: "I dind't do anything to those kids" instead of "my kids"
I was thinking the same thing. As if they are not his. Maybe that's the motiv.
@@Maria-wd1dk inorder to reduce guilt, people tend to objectify living beings
Derek van Schaik has a really good video that goes into depth about the little things like that that Chris said, as well as body language analysis. You should see the look on Chris’s face when a deputy behind him gets on his radio. No link, sorry, but easily searched in yt.
@@Maria-wd1dk - Nah, not the motive. He would have exposed it to destroy the image of his dead wife, and it would have garnered him sympathy.
@@Indipender To be fair, living beings ARE objects you know.
Nothing boils my blood more than the idea of being falsely convicted. In my humble opinion, 100 true convictions are not worth one false conviction.
I agree
It's a tough situation, and I agree about false convictions, but leaving all the criminals go to prevent one false conviction is clearly a losing viewpoint. You end up with 99 victims without justice, and most likely dozens of new victims from the freed criminals recidivism. I don't know how one would justify more victims rather than less.
Ben Franklin's quote "That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.."
@@imnotabotrlyimnot I agree with you. I get the point the comment is trying to make but objectively it’s better that 99 criminals are behind bars than 99 criminals getting to be free just so that 1 instance doesn’t happen. Also, there are other ways innocent people can be convicted. They can be framed or set up by the true perpetrator, doing so in a way that tampers with physical evidence (which is supposed to be a super reliable form of evidence). So like, as sad as it is, I believe it’s almost impossible for innocent people to never be falsely charged. If the hypothetical 99 people are murderous criminals, it’s just safer for society that they aren’t free at the cost of one innocent person being in jail
You are completely correct.
This is a biblical notion.
That it is better for a man to be potentially released that is guilty of a crime than an innocent man convicted falsely of a crime.
A lot of the world has forgotten this, and also that while we must strive for justice in this world, those who are guilty of evil will still face judgement of that evil when they die and will reap the due consequence.
"You have the right to remain silent"
"You have the right to talk to a lawyer"
These rights are here to protect you no matter whether you're innocent or guilty. So why not use them?
You dont get them until you're arrested?
@@akehapkap6143 If you haven't been arrested then you're free to leave and therefore don't have to talk to the police.
Also you can request a public attorney. They're not usually the best bet, but its almost always safer to have an attorney than not
@@renatatostada3318 they can still help you for better reputation.
Akehap Kap good tactics ;)
They interrogated my innocent cousin for abusing his son when it was really his ex girlfriend. She actually got her children taken away while he was in prison, but she didn't get locked up. The video file of the interrogation was said to be corrupted. My cousin said they kept trying to force him to admit his guilt and wouldn't listen to him. They said he did but he says they lied. Also he's illiterate, I bet they took advantage of that. Sounds fishy to me.
As someone who has suffered emotional abuse, watching this was so terrifying. The tricks and process is basically the same and I'm many ways, identical
The reason is because in both cases manipulation is used. However, in an emergency or crisis situation, things that would normally be considered unacceptable are permitted to save lives and mitigate damage.
Gaslighting vs professional gaslighting
But why would you admit to something you know you didnt do ? That doesn't make any sense.
@@Optim40 Because when psychological torture is used, it can trick the brain into believing things that aren't true. It is how psychological abusers trick their victims into thinking they deserve the abuse.
With police interrogations, these tactics are necessary most often, because it gets the guilty to confess. But, I'm just saying that it can unintentionally obtain false confessions as well.
@@CatholicK5357 Nah I don't buy that. I think if you do that then you should go to prison.
"The door isn't locked and whenever you want to leave Teresa will let you out..." -The ony proper response to this is "Thank you for your time and do you have a to go cup for my coffee." ;)
And a day later they arrest you with a warrant.
@@jamesupton4996 did you watch the whole video? It's better that they arrest you with a warrant the next day
@@jamesupton4996 and without a confession.
The fifth amendment says you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself and protect you against self-incrimination. If they come the next day with a warrant you could possibly make it seem like they’re trying to frame you
@@CornholioPuppetMaster being arrested on a warrant has nothing to do with self-incrimination. It just means they’re following procedure.
Here's what you need to do: ask "Am i being detained?" if they say no walk away. If they say yes respond to everything they say with "Give me a lawyer". Say nothing else. Do not 'ask' for a lawyer. Do not ask if they think you need a lawyer. Do not listen to them tell you what demanding a lawyer means for you. Speak with confidence and DEMAND a lawyer without a single doubt in their mind that you will bend on the subject. NEVER confess to anything. It doesn't matter if you're standing there holding onto a knife that is still sticking out of someones chest and they are playing HD video of you stabbing the guy who banged your wife. There's no need to rush.
why are you saying this with such passion?
@@iamURHO Why are you asking that question? Are you a cop?
@@iamURHO because I'm passionate.
@@iamURHO Because of the number of innocent people who have been tricked, coerced, bullied into a confession. For each person who it made to confess when they are innocent, not only is their life ruined but it can also mean murders are out there walking around free.
lmfaoooo
Never EVER consent to a police interrogation. Also when a suspect refuses to do so, and lawyers up instead, do not automatically consider him suspicious or guilty. He might just be smart. 🤷♀️
I learned from RUclips and tv shows what I have to do in this situation. 1. Am I under arrest or free to go? A: Call a lawyer and remain SILENT. B: Walk away.
Same here.
There's more truth on RUclips than on mainstream TV with all the political agendas journalists get paid to tell to suit a specific narrative in their favour. They don't care about he truth.
Walk away and they'll get a warrant for your arrest. Get a lawyer, definitely.
Also you can always say the magical words: "No comment" any time you want.
Then you get arrested the next day with a warrant and interrogated for 3 days straight
@@lilnutlord9117 And you can still tell them, "no comment" until you get a lawyer. The burden of proof is on them, not you. Don't talk to them.
"I'm not lying to you" - totally not a liar
“We can’t falsify video footage”
Haha editing, deep fakes, out of context clips, video stitching and audio swaps go brrrr
Yeah these days it's way too easy.
This video is one of the best videos I’ve watched on RUclips
Those false confessions hurt my heart cause really, what are you supposed to do? You keep proclaiming your innocence and they use these methods on you.
It's just....so painful to see and hear this bizarre police behavior. Imagine this being done to someone with undiagnosed special needs?!
What you are supposed to do is not say a word other than ask for a lawyer
You just have to stay strong
Ummm maybe just leave the room and walk away?
A better question is, if you are innocent, and they say you can leave whenever you want, why stay there? Obviously they don't really have certain evidence against you or you would already be arrested.
I would really enjoy this game with them, but I will probably never end up there
if a cop told me i was free to go at anytime, i would just leave lol
For real my friend
right?? i dont understand why they stay
it is at that point theyll place you under arrest
@@MM-rr1kp bingooooo. Technically they ain’t lying. You can get up and walk out the door, but they don’t mention the consequences of doing it.
@@therealrickytan rather sit in jail for a few months and go to trial to beat the case with a lawyer rather than say the wrong thing and go to prison for my whole life
It is never ever to your advantage to talk to the police in interrogations. Everything you say will be twisted that you are guilty.
Always: "Anything you say may be held *against* you in court"
Never: "Anything you say may *help* you in court."
Talking to cops is a no-win. Everything that comes out of your mouth will make things worse, not better.
Even if I answer every question with "Your momma...?"
1:53 is the perfect example why you NEVER talk to the cops and ALWAYS should ask for a lawyer, innocent or otherwise.
they made the innocent man doubt himself and think that he hurt his parents in his sleep? thats crazy
The fact they're holding you in a questioning room shows they have no case. Getting you to confess shortcuts their investigative work. Lawyer up and make them prove your guilt. You are presumed innocent under the law.
exactly. sufficient reason to leave the room just like that.
“Charisma On Command”
*AND*
“JCS - Criminal Psychology”
Christmas has come early.
Im on the content marathon as well...halfway through
What about James Duane?
Excellent videos from those guys!! Super entertaining
JCS is one of the best channels on RUclips on interrogation techniques.
The best interrogation repellent is to forget how to talk. Very underutilized.
O dang, nice
While that sounds good, the correct thing to do is to say, "I want an attorney."
Or you can be a good method actor and do a character that’s completely coo coo. Like lay on the floor with one leg on the wall and tell them you’ll only talk if you can smell their armpit. When/if they let you, change up the rules on them and say something like, “nvm you don’t look enough like my boy teddy roosevelt”
And don’t answer any questions from within the framework they establish
What if you just beatboxed at them?
@@solhamer3502 Then you would probably be held for a psych eval.
If I got wrongfully convicted of murdering my parents and subsequently spent 17 years in prison, I'd be going back 6 months later for murdering the detective who coersed the false confession out of me
YOU opened your mouth. You are responsible for convicting you.
6 months? Dude i will ask my inmate to save me my cell cuz i will be back in 3 hours.
@@yoyo762 An average person does not have the ability to endure a professionally trained psychological abuser. Don't blame the victim.
@@novacorponline If you do not educate yourself , your children or family, I WILL blame you for your willful ignorance of your rights.
Its sad that homegrown citizens CHOOSE to be so ignorant of their rights while immigrants to this country study, embrace and exercise their new found rights.
If you don't want to exercise your rights, don't try to play the victim card with me.
Trained interrogators have NO power when you say " I don't answer questions. I want a lawyer".
Clarification: by "you", I mean you personally, not the general "you" used to generalize. I do not approve of victim blaming, victim blaming is bad.
"Well if you have all this evidence on me, I guess this whole interview is pointless."
nah theyll say "we just want to know whyd you do it?" or something like that to get a confession
Yea, if the police want a confession from you, chances are that they don't have enough evidence to convict you
@@mactep98 "if u have the evidence then why are u asking?"
@@KARTIKEYA007 confession is the strongest evidence
@@mactep98 It's not, too many innocent people have confessed crimes.
This is a simplistic explanation. Interrogators often use a variety of techniques in various order. Or of the interrogator is a seasoned vet they've more than likely created their own routine
Same tactics as car dealerships, “get you a coffee” “let me talk to my boss”, salesman is bad cop/finance manager is good cop, a simple transaction takes 4-5 hours so you start to get fatigued and give them whatever they ask just so you can get out of there.
Defund the car salesman
I've experienced it the other way, too; in my case, the salescreature and I had agreed on a price and when he got back from getting it "signed off" it went up. Just sixty dollars, but I was so incensed at the duplicity, I nixed the deal.
Super interesting. Also, it's odd that law enforcement is allowed, encouraged, trained to lie, deceive, coerce, mislead.... And they all have "integrity" on their car.
Yeah that's the thing I appreciate about the UK. Police there cannot lie to you and must tell you everything they know about the case.
The US has a third world country when it comes to law enforcement. Their cops are trigger-happy amateurs compared to the police in the EU. In the EU the police are not allowed to lie and no one gets thrown into jail on confession alone. The courts can and will declare you innocent if there's no evidence against you, even if you confessed. That is done precisely to protect the innocent from being pressured to give false confessions.
Says who? You with your vast experience? The media? Defense attorneys? Consider the source...
@@michaelkatz7862 I work as a wildlife biologist but our game wardens do this, are trained to turn rumors (with zero evidence) into confessions. They lie all the time, "we've already got you bud, but if you work with us....". If you don't think it's a thing look into false confessions coerced by police or keep looking up interrogation tactics. It's really not a secret. They are literally trained to be deceivers.
@@rupertmedford3901 i agree, except, the goal isn't a false confession, but a true confession. It is a mind game for sure. The ethics is what i commented on. Not the apparent procedure. The "misleading" wss accepted by the US Supreme court in Oregon vs Mathiason in the 1970s. Getting a confession saying his fingerprints were found at the scene. Rumors are a lead and have solved murders and cold cases. Innocent people don't confess. Unless there's underlying mental issues. You know that in major publicized crimes many of the "usual suspects" will confess. No DA takes a case based on confession alone. But also, working with those in the field is not the same as working in the field. Even among cops there are braggarts. All investigators are trained to find the facts. AND what is behind the facts. A false confession is not factual. Using manipulation is not the same as creating something. With Miranda warnings, it's amazing how many still confess. Keep in mind, if you were the guys supervisor and knew he made up stuff, how could you trust him on anything. Supervisory or personal. I'd get rid of him fast. Once a cop lies on the stand, word spreads fast among judges. No one likes to be bamboozled.
The Police have entered the chat: Why are you giving our secrets away? There will be consequences
but first,we are your ally
@@JLchevz would you like a bottle of water or a coffee?
@@jeremymenning56 *calls lawyer*
@@jeremymenning56 coffee would be great , thank you
yeah, I'd like to talk to a lawyer now
JCS criminal psychology is an awesome channel. I really hope they start uploading content again. Thanks for the shout out to them!
this is because the goal of the justice system is not to catch the culprit, but to find someone to blame
Exactly right. Incentives are based on catching and convicting criminals, not reducing crime. Let's hope this changes one day.
Exactly!!! They waste time and neglect evidence, DNA and witnesses while pointing the finger at the wrong person
It's to feed the for profit prison system.
I liked your comment but to a *degree.* In my years of working with the public, I've learned how easily so many people lie to your face. I do not imagine a guilty suspect to suddenly be quite open and honest. So I both understand the psych-tactics to get to the guilty but also wish the innocent could simply remember (in the trauma of the moment) to *remain silent w/o a lawyer present!* The goal is to find the guilty. If you are convinced you have that person, of course you'll focus on them. Still, it behooves to consider the possibility of error. The mess is not the system but the flaws of human nature (IMHO).
Interrogator: "We can't falsify video footage."
Uhmmm... deep fakes?
I think at the time it was probably unknown or even the algorithm was not written. Even now, I've seen deep fakes, and they're not that convincing. It's probably still pretty easy to analyze video footage to prove it's fake.
@@patrickmcmanus1360 True...for now.
That's not how deepfakes works. Deepfakes would work better on celebrities because the A.I has tons of source to work with. Unless you have tons of HD videos of you in a good ligthing condition and various angles, in a close up, etc. Deepfake is hard to do on some random person.
CGI exist cops🙈
There are algorithms that easily spot the deepfakes
If they had enough to prosecute you, they wouldn’t be talking to you !!!
Not always true. Sometimes they want to dig for more.
@@IgonDrakeWarrior Well as long as you are actually innocent, @Evyy Smoove is right.
@@mister_stiff you ever seen to catch a predator? Why do they interview every single one of them with the chats confession to Chris and showing up. And they interview everyone because they don’t have enough evidence for any conviction???
@@mister_stiff They interview you to get more information out of you plain and simple. Whether you’re innocent or guilty.
@@IgonDrakeWarrior the only reason they interview them is to make a show lol
In Australia respond “no comment” till your lawyer arrives, your lawyer can establish what case they have against you, (police could just be fishing for information) plus if you have not been charged then leave the police station.
Always always always ask for an attorney. The 5th amendment is such a powerful right
Never ask for an attorney. *Demand* one.
Tell the police NOTHING directly. All information MUST be passed through your lawyer.
@@Gnomezonbacon True, rule of law is fast dying within the USA and the world. Authoritarianism is the main change made in 2020
It's actually the 6th amendment: "guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer..." read the book "You have the right to remain innocent."
@@Gnomezonbacon they already do.
It's called the media. If the authoritarians really want you locked up, they will utilize the media to create a smear campaign against you and make it a high profile case where the juror pool has already decided whether you're innocent or not before the trial even begins. See Kenosha Kyle for example.
Great taktics to make criminals confess but it's pretty messed up when someone is innocent.
Thats the problem. Police and prosecutors are rewarded for convictions. Not for finding out if someone actually did it.
@@Tearakan Explain to me how cops are rewarded? Do they get like a gift card or something?
@@valdie91285 What are you 12?
@@JimboRustles Police will get punished for putting proven innocent people away, so please explain why you find it so mandatory to insult someone for asking a question.
@@nokilhot3550 Prosecutors put people away, not detectives, and if people are proven innocent then they wouldn't be in jail in the first place.
Even if u innocent it's a horrible feeling getting accused of something u never did. I know cause I'm a narc survivor, narcs always lie and gaslight.
What did you “survive” lol
narc survivor?
Were you prosecuted?
What's a narc survivor? Narcotics?
a narc is a narcissist, so they're talking about abuse from a narcissist significant other or parent. And "survivor" is apparently now used to describe having lived through any kind of trauma. I don't think it's the right word to use, as it invites ridicule and doesn't serve it's purpose anymore to distinguish between actually life-threatening situations and other traumatic events, but it IS used for these kinds of issues.
The police : You can feel free to leave whenever you want, the door is not locked.
Me : Walks out*
When to get a lawyer?
Either 1. You're innocent or 2. You're guilty
What if i'm in between
Get 2! 😂💀
Also, please notice the priority of the conditions.
There a much-abused fable in the US that "Innocent people don't need lawyers" which is code for, "If you ask for a lawyer, we, who were thinking you could be innocent, will know for sure you're guilty."
In fact, the police ALWAYS hope to convict you; that's why you were arrested. So if you're innocent, you ESPECIALLY need a lawyer.
Prisons are housing a lot of innocent people right now. The system is so broken and it's in no small part because police are legally allowed to lie to you. Many people have literally spent their lives in prison for crimes they didn't commit. Innocent people have even been executed.
And before you say it's the price we have to pay to have a justice system, consider this: When an innocent is wrongfully convicted or executed, there are actually multiple injustices being committed, because a) the original victim did not get justice, b) the wrongfully convicted gets INjustice, c) their families suffer through all of this, and d) the real perpetrator is still at large perhaps even committing other crimes and victimizing other people.
Some unfortnatelu slip through, but prisons are NOT housing a lot of innocents.
The problem is that they want convictions more than the actual truth. So these BS psychological tactics that only get the naiive criminals and innocent that don’t try to get a lawyer are picking up more innocent than guilty.
I m just gonna put this in my brain. So that I ever need this info I can get to it quick
Instead of trying to refer back to this video when in need, just remember this simple word: attorney.
Reaching for the sky I see!
@@hypocriticalnihilist645 Or try not needing one!
@@user-kp6eh2wp3o Trying to not need an attorney is not a substitute for knowing what to do when you need one.
@@user-kp6eh2wp3o “He who represents himself has a fool for a client.”
If I’m ever in this situation I’m going to cut him off in the most disrespectful and passive aggressive way while saying “I want a lawyer”