I own a Ruger Mark IV Hunter and I love mine. I've had it for 2 years and it's flawless. I always thought rimfires were unreliable from my own experiences when I was younger. CCI Mini Mag is only ammo I shoot through it and that combination has never even had a misfire. I never thought I'd pay over $700 for a .22 LR pistol but I did and it was well worth the money.
I don't have a qlue on his lack of trust in the mark platforms. Most pistols will loosen screws when being used. Those Ruger standards or marks are simply a legend .
If you buy a Big Game (375H&H and up) rifle for Dangerous Game, it should come with express sights. The rear sight on that life saving piece of equipment will have the same wide V notch as the Ruger Mark IV Hunter. The wide V makes the sighting very fast, something a hunter would appreciate. If all you ever shoot is paper, buy the target model that has target sights. This is the Hunter model. I like the way the rear sight is set up.
I have 3 Ruger pistols and haven't had any issues with them. I have a Mark II (50th year (1999) special anniversary model that doesn't get shot much), a Single Six revolver (w/ the .22 mag cylinder, too) in stainless that you'd love to hunt with, and their 1979 Security Six .357 mag (with "Made in the 200th year of American Liberty" stamped on the frame). I bought them all new. The 2 revolvers have been shot a lot. I think your observations are all good ones and people should pay attention to them. Thanks for this frank review, Jacob, well done!
I grew up with Rugers, and they were always fantastic. I think in about the last decade or less is when Ruger has really been choking on qc, and having shooters return their guns for work, banking on shelf guns to keep them afloat and keep costs down. I could be wrong.
I like both sides of your review. Doesn't fit you, may be perfect for others. I like the gun. Shot a few different ones. It's a .22 though. Rather not carry .22 rifle over the shoulder sometimes. Easy to keep tight. These guns are accurate. Great for small game.
You want a baby rattle that comes loose after every 100 rounds, even with Loctite, get an SW22. Loctite is something you keep on the bench whether it's for your AR15 or MK pistol. Loctite doesn't seem to work on the SW22s, the SW22 it a rattly POS that shoots very well. Unfortunately I sold mine because of that, it's tendency to come loose no matter what. The good thing about Ruger MKs is the take-down is not held together by a main screw like the SW22. Using Loctite on sight screws and grip screws is very common. No valid argument if you're main complaint is having to use "Loctite". I will complain about having to use Loctite on a SW22 with no positive results. Happy shooting, buddy!
Bought a MKIV 22/45 lite in 2019 a MKIV target 5.5’ bull barrel in 2022 and the 75 anniversary MKIV just 3 months ago. Thousands or rounds down range with absolutely zero issues. Sorry to hear about you bad experience, but I also own Browning, and a smith and Wesson model 41. I’ll stick with my Rutgers.
The Standard has an aluminum frame. My Mark 2 and Mark 3 have great triggers. I have purchased 14 Ruger firearms over the past 35 years and I go to the range at least twice a month and shoot plenty of ammo. A few years ago I had trouble with a LC9s Pro. I sent it in, they fix it and had it back to me in 7 days. Never had anymore issues. Just sell the gun and move on.
Thanks for the vid. I will still be getting one for the range and like most firearms I own that dont have lock screws I'll lock tight any that come loose. I sure would not buy that pistol to hike around with, weight is everything. Love the quick take down as cleaning is everything on .22s. Appreciate the time given on the vid. Cheers.
I love my Ruger MKIV Tactical. It would definitely be a part of my bug out bag. Fit and finish is fantastic. Redundant sighting when you add CT laser to lower rail and/or red dot to top rail. Threaded barrel ready for your suppressor. ambi safety. easy takedown. Accurate. Reliable. I've had no issues with anything loosening up. It is heavy but it feels very sturdy and...authiritative. It feels like a serious handgun. again, fit and finish is fantastic. I also like the spring loaded mag eject feature. Nice touch. I have hunted with it. It takes out small game just fine. with suppressor attached, it's very quiet and nobody hears you taking game in the middle of the night. I really like this gun a lot. I have a couple MKIII 22/45s and an older MKII and this is my favorite. I wouldn't give this gun up. what I don't like? The sights should be night sights. The trigger could be better but it's OK. Crimson trace doesn't make a laser grip for it yet. Not Ruger's fault. But still, I would like green laser grips so I could put a light on the lower rail. It is heavy. There's no denying it but the weight, as I said, gives it a certain air of authority and I don't think I would trade the aluminum frame in for polymer.
I bought that gun over a year ago. Had the same issues with screws and front locking pin. Had issues with mag release as well. Oh also failed to eject shells on regular basis. So I don't doubt him for a second.
Anecdotally; I bought a 10/22 about 5 years ago now, owned one before that, both have been pretty flawless for me. I am seriously considering a Ruger Mark IV Lite because a buddy of mine has one, which I've fired and he's had zero issues with it (he just got his can for it and it makes me want one even more). I do hear that there might be some QA issues with Ruger lately though, which worries me... I've put thousands of rounds through mine and so far so good, so I guess everyone's mileage may vary.
With regard to screws coming out... I'm of two minds. Yeah it's annoying, but I'm not sure that I mind having to go through and putting blue locktite on things myself. I might even prefer it. I don't know, it hasn't be a huge issue for me personally, and it's such an easy "fix". I'd be more upset/worried if it were some really bad design flaw, poor machining, etc.
My problems in the past with Ruger have been bad flaws and machining, this one just loosing screws was just the straw that broke the camels back. But with 10/22s Ruger has been solid for... forever, and Idk, getting a Lite would probably be g2g, Im sure Ruger has sorted some stuff out, but man its just too hard for me to trust the brand anymore after 3 consecutive issues. As for the screws, do you redo the screws on all the guns you buy as soon as you buy them?
Yeah I can definitely see how, after so many negative experiences not wanting to continue to do business... I've had the same issues with Sig lately. Funny you should ask about screws... my latest purchase was a CZ and while typically CZ is rock solid with quality and QA, I had issues with the handle scale screws being poor, so I had to fix threads, and do some reshaping of the heads. They ended up being fine, but CZ also sent me replacements no questions asked... but no, typically I don't do that, or expect that I'd need to. Maybe after a few thousand rounds and regular use I can see screws backing out, but not virtually immediately for certain. Seems like some companies that have typically been really good for whatever reason need help with QA...
I love my Ruger MK II Target Competition Model but it’s just been a range gun and there’s no telling how old it is, Ruger might have been a totally different company back then. I’ll try one of their light weight models one day to help get the youngins into Steel Challenge with. The one I have is definitely too heavy for speed shooting, maybe bullseye...
Mine rattles apart some as well. The front sight and grips get loose generally. To me it seems like it's due to temperature change usually but I could be wrong. And the rear sight being a v notch sucks I agree. But otherwise this thing shoots amazingly after 1000 rounds for me
Ive been buying Ruger firearms for over 30 years. Ive owned almost every model of gun they make at one time or another and never had any issues with any of them. That being said i think that the workmanship on some of their guns has slipped a little since Bill passed on. But they will and do stand behind their firearms better then alot of manufactures out there. If you have an issue contact them and they will fix it. But i agree you shouldnt have to loctite a brand new gun. No excuses for that. If your not happy with the gun i would trade it for an older model like the Mark 2. Yes harder to take apart but they are bomb proof.
I as well have been buying Ruger firearms for a long time with no issues, as has my dad.My recent experience with a Ruger Mk IV Hunter has been nothing but bad so far though. I bought the pistol about a month ago. Upon mounting a red dot sight, I noticed the mounting holes on top the barrel/receiver were off center causing the optic to lean to the left of the gun. I contacted Ruger and they happily told me to send it back for replacement. About 3 weeks later I received the replacement. This one had been personally built by one of Ruger’s technicians and had been checked, test fired and inspected by himself and a few other workers. After giving the barrel an initial cleaning with just a light coat of oil and checking with a bore light to make sure it was clean, I noticed about 4 scratches 1.5 inches from the muzzle, that wrapped the whole circumstance of the bore. So once again I called Ruger customer support and they had me send pictures of the scratches to the technician that had built the gun. I’m waiting to hear back from him as that was at the very end of their shift. Also, the right wooden grip has a split in it at the very bottom. I honestly am in disbelief that I’ve had even half of these issues with a Ruger.
The best rear sight made for it is the Volquartsen Target Sight. The model you got is for target shooting or hunting. You should have bought the Ruger MKIV 22/45 LITE
Untrue in my opinion. I’ve had a ruger .40 for 10 years and more than 3000 rounds through it. No issues. Ruger .223 ranch rifle, 15 years 1500 plus rounds through it, no issues. Ruger Mark iv hunter - 1000 plus rounds, no issues whatsoever with any screws, sights, blah blah blah.
I totally agree with your comments Please read my review above. This guy either has no idea what he is talking about or does not know how to handle a firearm.
I just bought one and your review has given me a good heads-up on what to watch for. Unfortunately almost every firearm I've purchased lately has had similar issues. Keltec, S&W, etc... sign of the times. Cheers
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors I got to the range today with the MK-IV. It functioned very nice and was very accurate but the trigger sucks. Volquartson on order. The grip screws came loose on the right side after 200 rds. No big deal. I tightened them up and one stripped under very little torque. Found a similar one in the AR parts bin. New stronger ones on order too. I know. You told me so. Lol
I must admit the mk4 is nice,, however the from sight on mine came spinning around after the second trip to the range. I’ve blue locked it and will try today. And don’t screw down the rear , top receiver screw as it protrudes down on top of the the bolt. I locked those 3 screws also. Have had some ejection/ feed issues with light ammo,, aguila works great 38’ grain. Dressed sharp edges on mags to smooth out loading. My trigger is great. Gun is accurate. Fit and finish fantastic. I’ll be keeping mine and will enjoy it unless any major issues come up
Thanks for the first honest review that wasn't gushing all over these guns. I wonder if the all metal varieties like the target or competition hold up better? That said, I'm looking towards the 22LR 1911 single/dual action variations instead
I’ve had my mark lV for a year great plinker very accurate only issue I have is spent casing get stuck in chamber after high round count contributing that to dirty ammo
I just bought this gun. It is hands down the most accurate .22 pistol I've owned. Almost ruger 1022 accurate. Yes I've had to blue loctite the front sight screw and take down pivot screws. Ruger puts out some great guns and alot of crap too. Stay away from LC or SR anything. The best .22 for your purpose would be a ruger mk4 standard or a ruger bearcat with fixed sights. Less screws and moving parts. Smaller and lighter
The mk4 standard is still crazy heavy, and there is no way im getting something without adjustable sights. With that being said after multiple guns screwed up by Ruger, i went with a S&W 317 kit gun.
5 years later and I think the Mark IV has aged quite well. I have a Talo Hunter and it's really the Sportster of the 22LR pistol world. Out of the box it was a tank. With a few upgrades it's my do-it-all - to the point where I'm selling my Victory. I haven't had any of the problems you listed. Sorry if you got an early dud. I do agree that it's not a great bugout gun. It's just too big and heavy. The smaller, lighter 22/45 might fit that bill a bit better. Still, I think a Tac/Trainer style 22 would be a more obvious choice.
I do think that Ruger has a lot more issues with newer released and special editions. I can see the value of the pistol if properly made as well. The victory is kind of disappointing and I think the pistol is a perfect example of a firearm manufacture doing something half way- putting a product into the market due to the size of that specific market- but not actually caring enough to make it competitive in that market or to stand out. Making it just good enough to get some sales off the counter- but not investing enough time or resources to make it a standout product.
I think a better " stainless bug out 22lr handgun " would be the 8 shot Ruger SP101 with 4.2" barrel because it's 32% lighter weight and doesn't have any magazines to lose. If you're okay with aluminum, polymer and stainless steel then the 8 shot Ruger LCRx in 22lr with 3" barrel would be the best choice because it's 61% lighter weight.
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors That S&W looks nice on paper, but the aluminum cylinder can wear out over time. What bad experiences have you had with Ruger? I own over 30 different Ruger guns and haven't had any problems.
You are holding one of the finest pistols ever made and the most accurate. Watch 22Plinkster's review of this pistol. He will tell you how great this pistol is. First off the Hunter pistol needs some weight so that it can be held more steady. To light and your sights will be all over the place. Put the high viz red dot front sight on top of the white post like a lolly pop and you will hit what you are aiming at every time. Second, you are shooting lazy. Watching you shoot the pistol, you are almost laying down on the table like your about to pass out. Stand up and hold your arms out. Your not so old that your going to fall over. It's not the pistol that's bad, it's the shooter! If your going to be lazy, get a rifle and a shooting mat so that you can lay down and possibly take a nap while you are down there. You definitely need to rethink your needs for a bug out bag!! Your clueless to what a proper pistol should be in a bug out bag.
I got the Mark III, if you hate this one features make sure not to get the Mark III, taking it apart isa nightmare, I upgraded the shit out of mine to fall in love with it again, but actually bought the Black Mamba; night and day difference and I do not hate the Ruger it just needs a big shake down
I think that the mkiii comes from a time when Ruger made a better quality product but yeah I wasn't into that disassembly process. I don't LOVE the Buckmark's disassembly process either but I prefer it overall over the mk at this point.
Dang I like the way that thing breaks down ,, even a Cavewoman could do it . The rear sight not too crazy about not just on that pistol but not on any gun
My hunter didn't fall apart after one range trip but it is uncomfortable (upper rear frame imbeds itself in the web of my hand if I try to get high on it) and it's too heavy. Debated on a pac lite upper for it but would rather trade it for a buckmark and try to forget I owned it.
Get a series ll Colt Woodsman Match Target if you want perfection or a early to mid 1970,s HiStandard Supermatic Citation Military or Victor. I sure love mine. Or perhaps a Browning Buckmark Hunter would work for you, mine shoots flawlessly and perfectly with no modifications needed!
There could be the most perfectly made item, no matter what it is. For some folks it just isnt right for them. Thats you, its just your opinion. I have the blued Hunter. I dont need the heavier SS.
I don’t buy Ruger anymore . I had a 22 rifle and it it would always jam on me I shipped it back 2 times never got it fixed. I got rid of it and never bought anymore. I went and bought a Henry. They are more expensive but a better quality of gun. I really Enjoy the Henry.
Did you happen to use Remington ammo? Might be the reason for the constant jamming. At least some types of Remington .22LR ammo are complete crap and don't cycle semi-automatics correctly. In a repeating gun like the Henry it will work perfectly fine though.
You can get smaller,lighter pistols but you give up accuracy. I have also owned a buck ark and I prefer the Ruger.I go over all my guns and check screw tightness now and then. I had a mark 2 that was worse at that than I have now. Now I have a mark 3 witch rarely ever loosens up. I also have to go over my motorcycle now and then also with a bottle of blue loctite( and it ain’t a Harley). I expect to have to do it. It’s called preventive maintenance. SHOOT SAFE!!!!!!!!!
I do own a harley actually- as well as plenty of other guns. No bolts coming loose on anything else. I do think this example of a mk was a friday or a monday gun but it just wasnt worth it. And btw- weight has nothing to do with accuracy 👌🏻
I will trade you my like new mark 4 , 1911 with it’s box and 4 magazines. Provide yours comes with its original box ect. My experience with all my Rugers have been great and shot them all quite a bit. Nothing has ever come loose once. Including my Mark 4/45
I'm sad that Ruger has been such a bad experience for you . My old man used to say that it would be a terrible world if we all thought the same so I have to write and say my Ruger Mark 2 has never ever let me down , never caused me any problems after several thousand rounds through it and if I had one gun to put in my bug-out-bag I'd have no hesitation choosing my Mark 2 Competition .. Having owned a Browning Buckmark before I'd have no hesitation in throwing it in the creek and letting it drown .. Wes Martin
I guess if you would have thought about the weight for oh 5 seconds before you bought it, you'd of realized that this is NOT the pistol for bug out! Geez!
Thats awesome man. On a related note, have you ever made a video on the whole bowe bergdahl situation? My gf has been playing this msm podcast on the situation and I know its 100% biased but its still interesting. Do you have any insight on why he initially left?
I agree that ruger quality is terrible. My last 3 ruger pistols are junk! Lcp2 22 trigger broke. Wrangler 22 keyholes and my new model vaquero in 45 colt cylinder throats are too small .448 Ruger...nevermore
It's hard to take your review seriously, especially when you would even consider this 22LR pistol for a bug out bag.This is a range or plinking gun, not for a bug out bag or as a carry. I have the Mark IV Hunter and not one screw has come loose after 4,000 rounds. I am a big Ruger fan and also have the Vaquero, Single Ten, 1911, Security 9, LCP II, 10/22 and the 10/22 takedown. Ruger makes some of the best firearms, with high quality and a fair price. I've never had a problem with any Ruger and I believe you either have no idea what you are talking about or do not know how to handle a firearm.
#1- i have other videos of rugers literally terrible quality control that show plenty of issues, and one look at the forums shows i am certainly not alone. #2- having a gun with proper quality control says nothing of a companies quality, its the number of ones that are screwed up that is important. #3-its hard to take your comment seriously if you cant understand these foundational, basic principles. I believe you either have no idea what you are talking about, or you dont know how to handle a firearm. I assure you as a combat vet, leo officer, and person who takes private professional training, that i both know what i am talking about, and know how to handle a gun lol
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors I appreciate you taking the time to respond. I know I was a little harsh but have never had a problem with Ruger for thirty years. It’s not like my collection is old either. The Ruger firearms I listed were add ins to my collection and were all purchased in the last five years.
@@davidstepeck2644 i have had 2 10/22's that were flawless, and i come from a ruger family, where everybody buys ruger. My dad has never had an issue. But every Ruger i have bough since like 2011 has had issues, some of them big. When you go to the forums, be it revolver forums, rimfire central, 1911, etc, you will see that a LOT of people have the same issue- which is what defranchised me to them, especially after i FINALLY ordered a lipseys bisley blackhawk sheriff's model and it was just crap. So it is what it is at the end of the day. Smith and Wesson isnt a lot better in a lot of categories, a person might have to search to be sure of quality, or they might have to be willing to return their firearm a few times. After my single 10, a blackhawk convertible, the ruger, then the bisley blackhawk, ill never buy another. 4 strikes and your out, i guess i was a slow learner with high hopes.
Why would someone buy a full size all stainless gun for a bugout bag? You can’t strike out Ruger for that. Shouldve went with aluminum or polymer if you’re worried about weight and corrosion. Yea, screws coming loose is annoying but can be expected. This is like saying I’m not ever buying a Chevy again because I bought a 1 ton gas truck and it doesn’t get good gas mileage. Makes no sense?
Really, i said i wasnt buying ruger again because of 1 bad experience? Did i really attribute any fault to Ruger fkr anything? Thanks for trying so hard to miss every point in the video 👌🏻
If you don't want a heavy ass gun for bug out then do not buy it... That simple. You can clearly see the weight on the spec sheet when viewing ruger's site www.ruger.com/products/markIVHunter/specSheets/40118.html.... And who has never seen screws back out on guns regardless of caliber? Essentially every gun I own with small sets of screws has issues with screws backing out. (after extensive round count of course). Applying blue locktite would cost how much? Monetarily or time wise I would say it wouldn't be that much of an inconvenience. Given the fact that you are a prepper you should most likely have a bottle of blue locktite laying around anyway lol. Right? I do not mean any trouble or disrespect because I have had my own issues with Rugers myself, but I have also had some issues with others such as NAA, Springfield Armory, Spikes, and even BCM.... All these jokers had to be sent back or had parts issues so all I can say is , shit happens folks.... Long gone are the days where you can just buy something and expect it to work perfectly... Murphey's law I suppose. I just think that if you want something to fit a specific role just do some more research on it. There are many other options that could have fit your needs better than this gun that would have been lighter weight in the same caliber, and hey there is always the option of something other than .22 lr as well.
I think the Mk3's were def solid shooters! I have been hearing about those Walthers a little bit in the comments, the new manufactures 22lr versions of their fighting pistols are pretty interesting!
Good job for pointing out something that has absolutely nothing to do with the video. Maybe you should base your opinion on the new camaro on one from 1979? It still amazes me how stupid people advertise themselves to be. 👏🏻
Not to beat you man it's a good video. But that particular pistol you have is the finest 22lr pistol under $1500. It's not for backpacking. If that what your after buy a cheap semi auto mini version of a bigger gun like the glock 44
Under 1500!? Lol! I would choose a buckmark over the ruger regardless of price- and im pretty sure options open WAY up even with volquartzen (sp) and tacsol below 1500. The ruger has an okayish trigger, poor fit and finish, and mine came with cracked grips. Finest nothing.
Just buy a pac-lite upper, or buy a light weight model. I've seen a buckmark that was dropped, it broke in two. The damn things are made of pot metal. I agree though, Ruger QC is non-existant.
Not entirely true. It means being deprived of SOME RIGHT, PRIVILEDGE or IMMUNITY. We are all here to watch a review of a pistol. Lets not waste time correcting his use of a word. and if you do.....please make sure you are correct. Grammar Police signing off.......
Thumbs down is actually the literal best thing i can get to make videos go viral, so thanks for that. As far as ruger quality, maybe if you didn't live as a slave in a socialist pit you could spend enough time with firearms to know what im talking about in this video, but clearly unless you move to the good ole' usa, you will never get that opportunity. 👍
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors thank you for the answer. Almost everyone talking all good about ruger and I dont believe, i believe u when u said something wrong. Gonna look for Browling buckmark but model stainless steel weights the same and I think its more relible then polimer or aluminium ? Which one should I choose
man all you have to do is blue loc tite a really good gun. and the buck mark cost twice as much as this gun. anyway are you selling it cause I'm in the marke?.
#1- i did loctite the gun- which i said in the video. Glad to know you didnt watch the whole thing. #2- the browning buckmark is closer to half the price of this model of mkiv #3- already sold. Way to post an entirely stupid comment. 👍
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors if I’m hunting squirrel just need one. I agree I wouldn’t use for a bug out bag, I’d use a Henry survival rifle or something similar.
So you bought a heavy pistol and then come here to complain to us about the weight? Then you complain about the screws coming loose. It literally takes 2 seconds to put a drop of loctite on a screw and it will never come loose again. Then you don’t like the trigger. There probably is no other gun on the planet that has so many aftermarket parts for including triggers.
@SavageVoyageur and yet for half the money I bought a buckmark that alleviates all those problems. None of those issues alone were the issue necessarily- It was those issues along with it costing like $800
Nobody said it was 10oz too heavy, but no real prepper ever questioned the importance of saving weight in a pack, because actually preppers ACTUALLY PREP. 👍🏻
Thank You for not buying Ruger again. They are great firearms and if you know what your doing with one, learn about what you have and make competent statements.
I have a Hunter and A 22/45 both have been service free why anyone would purchase a pistol at 40oz for a bug out bag needs to get a brain. Personally, I totally disagree with your review. I have unsubscribed
Just a few notes- First- you were never subscribed, if you were, you wouldnt have just came here to share your stupid 5 years late. Second- "i disagree" with nothing to back up your disagreement but an emotional statement is a sure sign of stupidity. So thanks for stopping by and letting everyone know how stupid you are- it helps to frame future comments.
Yea this gun is awesome, can care less what a white Urkel with a fro hulk and some tough guy arm tats on a soy latte boy has to say about this gun. Ohhh would u look at this , would u look at that . Oh did i do that.
What the heck is the matter with you, besides being young and inexperienced? Keep an eye on your equipment and take care of it. I question your practical intelligence. You didn't know the weight of it before you bought it? Bad review,
I own a Ruger Mark IV Hunter and I love mine. I've had it for 2 years and it's flawless. I always thought rimfires were unreliable from my own experiences when I was younger. CCI Mini Mag is only ammo I shoot through it and that combination has never even had a misfire. I never thought I'd pay over $700 for a .22 LR pistol but I did and it was well worth the money.
This guy is definitely being paid by browning
My exact thoughts 🤣🤣
Thank you. Being a neutral Ruger/Browning guy, this comment made sense to me.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 yes, sure there are a few lemmons from all gun makers. But rugers signature pistol series are quite superrior
I don't have a qlue on his lack of trust in the mark platforms. Most pistols will loosen screws when being used. Those Ruger standards or marks are simply a legend .
If you buy a Big Game (375H&H and up) rifle for Dangerous Game, it should come with express sights. The rear sight on that life saving piece of equipment will have the same wide V notch as the Ruger Mark IV Hunter. The wide V makes the sighting very fast, something a hunter would appreciate. If all you ever shoot is paper, buy the target model that has target sights. This is the Hunter model. I like the way the rear sight is set up.
I have 3 Ruger pistols and haven't had any issues with them. I have a Mark II (50th year (1999) special anniversary model that doesn't get shot much), a Single Six revolver (w/ the .22 mag cylinder, too) in stainless that you'd love to hunt with, and their 1979 Security Six .357 mag (with "Made in the 200th year of American Liberty" stamped on the frame). I bought them all new. The 2 revolvers have been shot a lot. I think your observations are all good ones and people should pay attention to them. Thanks for this frank review, Jacob, well done!
I grew up with Rugers, and they were always fantastic. I think in about the last decade or less is when Ruger has really been choking on qc, and having shooters return their guns for work, banking on shelf guns to keep them afloat and keep costs down. I could be wrong.
I like both sides of your review. Doesn't fit you, may be perfect for others. I like the gun. Shot a few different ones. It's a .22 though. Rather not carry .22 rifle over the shoulder sometimes. Easy to keep tight. These guns are accurate. Great for small game.
It’s a fantastic gun. I’ve had to tighten every screw on every gun I’ve ever had at least once.
You want a baby rattle that comes loose after every 100 rounds, even with Loctite, get an SW22.
Loctite is something you keep on the bench whether it's for your AR15 or MK pistol. Loctite doesn't seem to work on the SW22s, the SW22 it a rattly POS that shoots very well. Unfortunately I sold mine because of that, it's tendency to come loose no matter what. The good thing about Ruger MKs is the take-down is not held together by a main screw like the SW22. Using Loctite on sight screws and grip screws is very common. No valid argument if you're main complaint is having to use "Loctite". I will complain about having to use Loctite on a SW22 with no positive results. Happy shooting, buddy!
Bought a MKIV 22/45 lite in 2019 a MKIV target 5.5’ bull barrel in 2022 and the 75 anniversary MKIV just 3 months ago. Thousands or rounds down range with absolutely zero issues. Sorry to hear about you bad experience, but I also own Browning, and a smith and Wesson model 41. I’ll stick with my Rutgers.
The Standard has an aluminum frame. My Mark 2 and Mark 3 have great triggers. I have purchased 14 Ruger firearms over the past 35 years and I go to the range at least twice a month and shoot plenty of ammo. A few years ago I had trouble with a LC9s Pro. I sent it in, they fix it and had it back to me in 7 days. Never had anymore issues. Just sell the gun and move on.
Thanks for the vid. I will still be getting one for the range and like most firearms I own that dont have lock screws I'll lock tight any that come loose. I sure would not buy that pistol to hike around with, weight is everything. Love the quick take down as cleaning is everything on .22s. Appreciate the time given on the vid. Cheers.
Itll be perf for that!
I love my Ruger MKIV Tactical. It would definitely be a part of my bug out bag. Fit and finish is fantastic. Redundant sighting when you add CT laser to lower rail and/or red dot to top rail. Threaded barrel ready for your suppressor. ambi safety. easy takedown. Accurate. Reliable. I've had no issues with anything loosening up. It is heavy but it feels very sturdy and...authiritative. It feels like a serious handgun. again, fit and finish is fantastic. I also like the spring loaded mag eject feature. Nice touch. I have hunted with it. It takes out small game just fine. with suppressor attached, it's very quiet and nobody hears you taking game in the middle of the night. I really like this gun a lot. I have a couple MKIII 22/45s and an older MKII and this is my favorite. I wouldn't give this gun up.
what I don't like? The sights should be night sights. The trigger could be better but it's OK. Crimson trace doesn't make a laser grip for it yet. Not Ruger's fault. But still, I would like green laser grips so I could put a light on the lower rail. It is heavy. There's no denying it but the weight, as I said, gives it a certain air of authority and I don't think I would trade the aluminum frame in for polymer.
I bought that gun over a year ago. Had the same issues with screws and front locking pin. Had issues with mag release as well. Oh also failed to eject shells on regular basis. So I don't doubt him for a second.
I love my Hunter. It has ALL Volquartzen internals. 2-1/4# trigger. It’s perfect with a red dot on top.
Anecdotally; I bought a 10/22 about 5 years ago now, owned one before that, both have been pretty flawless for me. I am seriously considering a Ruger Mark IV Lite because a buddy of mine has one, which I've fired and he's had zero issues with it (he just got his can for it and it makes me want one even more). I do hear that there might be some QA issues with Ruger lately though, which worries me... I've put thousands of rounds through mine and so far so good, so I guess everyone's mileage may vary.
With regard to screws coming out... I'm of two minds. Yeah it's annoying, but I'm not sure that I mind having to go through and putting blue locktite on things myself. I might even prefer it. I don't know, it hasn't be a huge issue for me personally, and it's such an easy "fix". I'd be more upset/worried if it were some really bad design flaw, poor machining, etc.
My problems in the past with Ruger have been bad flaws and machining, this one just loosing screws was just the straw that broke the camels back. But with 10/22s Ruger has been solid for... forever, and Idk, getting a Lite would probably be g2g, Im sure Ruger has sorted some stuff out, but man its just too hard for me to trust the brand anymore after 3 consecutive issues. As for the screws, do you redo the screws on all the guns you buy as soon as you buy them?
Yeah I can definitely see how, after so many negative experiences not wanting to continue to do business... I've had the same issues with Sig lately. Funny you should ask about screws... my latest purchase was a CZ and while typically CZ is rock solid with quality and QA, I had issues with the handle scale screws being poor, so I had to fix threads, and do some reshaping of the heads. They ended up being fine, but CZ also sent me replacements no questions asked... but no, typically I don't do that, or expect that I'd need to. Maybe after a few thousand rounds and regular use I can see screws backing out, but not virtually immediately for certain. Seems like some companies that have typically been really good for whatever reason need help with QA...
I love my Ruger MK II Target Competition Model but it’s just been a range gun and there’s no telling how old it is, Ruger might have been a totally different company back then. I’ll try one of their light weight models one day to help get the youngins into Steel Challenge with. The one I have is definitely too heavy for speed shooting, maybe bullseye...
I know what you're talking about, the Mark two 22/45 with tapered barrel eliminates a lot of screw issues, grips/sights etc.
Mine rattles apart some as well. The front sight and grips get loose generally. To me it seems like it's due to temperature change usually but I could be wrong. And the rear sight being a v notch sucks I agree. But otherwise this thing shoots amazingly after 1000 rounds for me
Ive been buying Ruger firearms for over 30 years. Ive owned almost every model of gun they make at one time or another and never had any issues with any of them. That being said i think that the workmanship on some of their guns has slipped a little since Bill passed on. But they will and do stand behind their firearms better then alot of manufactures out there. If you have an issue contact them and they will fix it. But i agree you shouldnt have to loctite a brand new gun. No excuses for that. If your not happy with the gun i would trade it for an older model like the Mark 2. Yes harder to take apart but they are bomb proof.
The older Rugers were solid. I ended up trading this towards a S&W 317.
I as well have been buying Ruger firearms for a long time with no issues, as has my dad.My recent experience with a Ruger Mk IV Hunter has been nothing but bad so far though. I bought the pistol about a month ago. Upon mounting a red dot sight, I noticed the mounting holes on top the barrel/receiver were off center causing the optic to lean to the left of the gun. I contacted Ruger and they happily told me to send it back for replacement. About 3 weeks later I received the replacement. This one had been personally built by one of Ruger’s technicians and had been checked, test fired and inspected by himself and a few other workers. After giving the barrel an initial cleaning with just a light coat of oil and checking with a bore light to make sure it was clean, I noticed about 4 scratches 1.5 inches from the muzzle, that wrapped the whole circumstance of the bore. So once again I called Ruger customer support and they had me send pictures of the scratches to the technician that had built the gun. I’m waiting to hear back from him as that was at the very end of their shift. Also, the right wooden grip has a split in it at the very bottom. I honestly am in disbelief that I’ve had even half of these issues with a Ruger.
The best rear sight made for it is the Volquartsen Target Sight. The model you got is for target shooting or hunting. You should have bought the Ruger MKIV 22/45 LITE
Untrue in my opinion. I’ve had a ruger .40 for 10 years and more than 3000 rounds through it. No issues. Ruger .223 ranch rifle, 15 years 1500 plus rounds through it, no issues. Ruger Mark iv hunter
- 1000 plus rounds, no issues whatsoever with any screws, sights, blah blah blah.
I totally agree with your comments Please read my review above. This guy either has no idea what he is talking about or does not know how to handle a firearm.
I just bought one and your review has given me a good heads-up on what to watch for. Unfortunately almost every firearm I've purchased lately has had similar issues. Keltec, S&W, etc... sign of the times.
Cheers
Its sad. I dont touch ruger, s&w, or keltec for that very reason.
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors I got to the range today with the MK-IV. It functioned very nice and was very accurate but the trigger sucks. Volquartson on order. The grip screws came loose on the right side after 200 rds. No big deal. I tightened them up and one stripped under very little torque. Found a similar one in the AR parts bin. New stronger ones on order too. I know. You told me so. Lol
I must admit the mk4 is nice,, however the from sight on mine came spinning around after the second trip to the range. I’ve blue locked it and will try today. And don’t screw down the rear , top receiver screw as it protrudes down on top of the the bolt. I locked those 3 screws also. Have had some ejection/ feed issues with light ammo,, aguila works great 38’ grain. Dressed sharp edges on mags to smooth out loading. My trigger is great. Gun is accurate. Fit and finish fantastic. I’ll be keeping mine and will enjoy it unless any major issues come up
Thanks for sportin’ the BCGs. Reminds me of my old Army days.
Haha my pleasure!
Thanks for the first honest review that wasn't gushing all over these guns. I wonder if the all metal varieties like the target or competition hold up better?
That said, I'm looking towards the 22LR 1911 single/dual action variations instead
I’ve had my mark lV for a year great plinker very accurate only issue I have is spent casing get stuck in chamber after high round count contributing that to dirty ammo
I just bought this gun. It is hands down the most accurate .22 pistol I've owned. Almost ruger 1022 accurate. Yes I've had to blue loctite the front sight screw and take down pivot screws. Ruger puts out some great guns and alot of crap too. Stay away from LC or SR anything. The best .22 for your purpose would be a ruger mk4 standard or a ruger bearcat with fixed sights. Less screws and moving parts. Smaller and lighter
The mk4 standard is still crazy heavy, and there is no way im getting something without adjustable sights. With that being said after multiple guns screwed up by Ruger, i went with a S&W 317 kit gun.
5 years later and I think the Mark IV has aged quite well. I have a Talo Hunter and it's really the Sportster of the 22LR pistol world. Out of the box it was a tank. With a few upgrades it's my do-it-all - to the point where I'm selling my Victory. I haven't had any of the problems you listed. Sorry if you got an early dud.
I do agree that it's not a great bugout gun. It's just too big and heavy. The smaller, lighter 22/45 might fit that bill a bit better. Still, I think a Tac/Trainer style 22 would be a more obvious choice.
I do think that Ruger has a lot more issues with newer released and special editions.
I can see the value of the pistol if properly made as well.
The victory is kind of disappointing and I think the pistol is a perfect example of a firearm manufacture doing something half way- putting a product into the market due to the size of that specific market- but not actually caring enough to make it competitive in that market or to stand out. Making it just good enough to get some sales off the counter- but not investing enough time or resources to make it a standout product.
I understand your negative sentiment about your Ruger. I've also had problems with my Rugers.
I think a better " stainless bug out 22lr handgun " would be the 8 shot Ruger SP101 with 4.2" barrel because it's 32% lighter weight and doesn't have any magazines to lose. If you're okay with aluminum, polymer and stainless steel then the 8 shot Ruger LCRx in 22lr with 3" barrel would be the best choice because it's 61% lighter weight.
I ended up going a similar route with an s&w 317 kit gun. It sucked.
Im done buying ruger.
I ended up with another Buckmark.
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors That S&W looks nice on paper, but the aluminum cylinder can wear out over time. What bad experiences have you had with Ruger? I own over 30 different Ruger guns and haven't had any problems.
You are holding one of the finest pistols ever made and the most accurate. Watch 22Plinkster's review of this pistol. He will tell you how great this pistol is. First off the Hunter pistol needs some weight so that it can be held more steady. To light and your sights will be all over the place. Put the high viz red dot front sight on top of the white post like a lolly pop and you will hit what you are aiming at every time. Second, you are shooting lazy. Watching you shoot the pistol, you are almost laying down on the table like your about to pass out. Stand up and hold your arms out. Your not so old that your going to fall over. It's not the pistol that's bad, it's the shooter! If your going to be lazy, get a rifle and a shooting mat so that you can lay down and possibly take a nap while you are down there. You definitely need to rethink your needs for a bug out bag!! Your clueless to what a proper pistol should be in a bug out bag.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Sounds like a 100% honest review to me. Much appreciated 👍
This review makes me laugh, I also had every single damn screw work loose on my mkiv hunter. I’ve been blue lock tighting them.
Ah man I’m sorry to hear that I like all my rugers so far but recent one of my buddies had issues with his as well 😬 knock on wood
Sounds like you got the wrong gun, the lite would probable suited you better?
The word Doof comes to mind. Too good to use Loctite blue, 'eh?
I guess ruger is, yeah
I got the Mark III, if you hate this one features make sure not to get the Mark III, taking it apart isa nightmare, I upgraded the shit out of mine to fall in love with it again, but actually bought the Black Mamba; night and day difference and I do not hate the Ruger it just needs a big shake down
I think that the mkiii comes from a time when Ruger made a better quality product but yeah I wasn't into that disassembly process.
I don't LOVE the Buckmark's disassembly process either but I prefer it overall over the mk at this point.
Good video. What would be your choice for a 22 auto pistol in a bugout bag ?
Probably a buckmark
Looks pretty sweet!
You don't put a gun this pretty in a bugout bag
Yeah the Ruger Hunter is great, this guy is what you call a complainer...Hates his voice
Oh. My. God. When i went to look at the views it said “No views”.
*tear drop rolling down cheek*
I’M FINALLY FIRST!!!
hahahahahahahah nice!
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors Thanks man!
it's like an orgasm at the end of a roller coaster ride !
Congrats. It is fun. lol
Thanks for the video, I changed my mind about it, I was about to get two, one for my wife and one for me, but after this video I will take a pass
Yeah, there are probably better things out there 👍
Never a issue on any of my Ruger literally thousands of rounds of trouble free use.I do agree the weight is not suitable for a bug out bag though.
Newer or older?
Dang I like the way that thing breaks down ,, even a Cavewoman could do it .
The rear sight not too crazy about not just on that pistol but not on any gun
Zero issues with mine.
Cool
Mine came with a U Notch and no looseness detected after 2k rounds
My hunter didn't fall apart after one range trip but it is uncomfortable (upper rear frame imbeds itself in the web of my hand if I try to get high on it) and it's too heavy. Debated on a pac lite upper for it but would rather trade it for a buckmark and try to forget I owned it.
Yeah i now have another buckmark haha
should have gotten a 5.5 inch target. The weight is key my friend. I'm use to carrying a .44 navy. These guns are light in comparison.
I have the same gun olso mk iii sr22 ruger makes great guns maybe the person behind the gun it's the problem.
Way to not watch the video while defending a brand blindly like a moron. Lol yeesh
I concur on that V-notch. Great pistol.
Get a series ll Colt Woodsman Match Target if you want perfection or a early to mid 1970,s HiStandard Supermatic Citation Military or Victor. I sure love mine. Or perhaps a Browning Buckmark Hunter would work for you, mine shoots flawlessly and perfectly with no modifications needed!
I dont want perfection.
But yes, i finally grabbed my 3rd buckmark. I have been happy with every one.
The single thumbs down was from Ruger. Great video.
Haha thats hilarious! Thanks!
Lol
That non threaded barrel is a failure
There could be the most perfectly made item, no matter what it is. For some folks it just isnt right for them. Thats you, its just your opinion. I have the blued Hunter. I dont need the heavier SS.
I don’t buy Ruger anymore . I had a 22 rifle and it it would always jam on me I shipped it back 2 times never got it fixed. I got rid of it and never bought anymore. I went and bought a Henry. They are more expensive but a better quality of gun. I really Enjoy the Henry.
I absolutely love Henry. I really wish they would come out with some revolvers!
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors with octagonal barrels!
@@jeremiahshine YES!!!
Did you happen to use Remington ammo? Might be the reason for the constant jamming. At least some types of Remington .22LR ammo are complete crap and don't cycle semi-automatics correctly. In a repeating gun like the Henry it will work perfectly fine though.
I, too, have had issues with the screws working their way out, with several 22's.
You can get smaller,lighter pistols but you give up accuracy. I have also owned a buck ark and I prefer the Ruger.I go over all my guns and check screw tightness now and then. I had a mark 2 that was worse at that than I have now. Now I have a mark 3 witch rarely ever loosens up. I also have to go over my motorcycle now and then also with a bottle of blue loctite( and it ain’t a Harley). I expect to have to do it. It’s called preventive maintenance. SHOOT SAFE!!!!!!!!!
I do own a harley actually- as well as plenty of other guns.
No bolts coming loose on anything else.
I do think this example of a mk was a friday or a monday gun but it just wasnt worth it.
And btw- weight has nothing to do with accuracy 👌🏻
I will trade you my like new mark 4 , 1911 with it’s box and 4 magazines. Provide yours comes with its original box ect. My experience with all my Rugers have been great and shot them all quite a bit. Nothing has ever come loose once. Including my Mark 4/45
The only complaint i have on mine is the rear sight moved to one side & wont go back .thats no big deal to me I've got a red dot on it
I'm sad that Ruger has been such a bad experience for you . My old man used to say that it would be a terrible world if we all thought the same so I have to write and say my Ruger Mark 2 has never ever let me down , never caused me any problems after several thousand rounds through it and if I had one gun to put in my bug-out-bag I'd have no hesitation choosing my Mark 2 Competition .. Having owned a Browning Buckmark before I'd have no hesitation in throwing it in the creek and letting it drown .. Wes Martin
I guess if you would have thought about the weight for oh 5 seconds before you bought it, you'd of realized that this is NOT the pistol for bug out! Geez!
True, and if i learned from Rugers pos qc in the past i would have known it would also be garbage as well. Live and learn right?
jacob whats the writing on your tattoo?
Psalm 144:1 in Pashtu- the local dialect spoken in the province of Afghanistan where I deployed
Thats awesome man. On a related note, have you ever made a video on the whole bowe bergdahl situation? My gf has been playing this msm podcast on the situation and I know its 100% biased but its still interesting. Do you have any insight on why he initially left?
I agree that ruger quality is terrible. My last 3 ruger pistols are junk! Lcp2 22 trigger broke. Wrangler 22 keyholes and my new model vaquero in 45 colt cylinder throats are too small .448 Ruger...nevermore
sounds like you have a screw loose
LOCTITE will take care of that problem.
And it did, but on a $600+ 22lr i do expect the manufacture to properly assemble their firearms.
Great info, ty
It's hard to take your review seriously, especially when you would even consider this 22LR pistol for a bug out bag.This is a range or plinking gun, not for a bug out bag or as a carry. I have the Mark IV Hunter and not one screw has come loose after 4,000 rounds. I am a big Ruger fan and also have the Vaquero, Single Ten, 1911, Security 9, LCP II, 10/22 and the 10/22 takedown. Ruger makes some of the best firearms, with high quality and a fair price. I've never had a problem with any Ruger and I believe you either have no idea what you are talking about or do not know how to handle a firearm.
#1- i have other videos of rugers literally terrible quality control that show plenty of issues, and one look at the forums shows i am certainly not alone.
#2- having a gun with proper quality control says nothing of a companies quality, its the number of ones that are screwed up that is important.
#3-its hard to take your comment seriously if you cant understand these foundational, basic principles. I believe you either have no idea what you are talking about, or you dont know how to handle a firearm. I assure you as a combat vet, leo officer, and person who takes private professional training, that i both know what i am talking about, and know how to handle a gun lol
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors I appreciate you taking the time to respond. I know I was a little harsh but have never had a problem with Ruger for thirty years. It’s not like my collection is old either. The Ruger firearms I listed were add ins to my collection and were all purchased in the last five years.
@@davidstepeck2644 i have had 2 10/22's that were flawless, and i come from a ruger family, where everybody buys ruger. My dad has never had an issue. But every Ruger i have bough since like 2011 has had issues, some of them big. When you go to the forums, be it revolver forums, rimfire central, 1911, etc, you will see that a LOT of people have the same issue- which is what defranchised me to them, especially after i FINALLY ordered a lipseys bisley blackhawk sheriff's model and it was just crap.
So it is what it is at the end of the day. Smith and Wesson isnt a lot better in a lot of categories, a person might have to search to be sure of quality, or they might have to be willing to return their firearm a few times. After my single 10, a blackhawk convertible, the ruger, then the bisley blackhawk, ill never buy another. 4 strikes and your out, i guess i was a slow learner with high hopes.
Why would someone buy a full size all stainless gun for a bugout bag? You can’t strike out Ruger for that. Shouldve went with aluminum or polymer if you’re worried about weight and corrosion. Yea, screws coming loose is annoying but can be expected. This is like saying I’m not ever buying a Chevy again because I bought a 1 ton gas truck and it doesn’t get good gas mileage. Makes no sense?
Really, i said i wasnt buying ruger again because of 1 bad experience?
Did i really attribute any fault to Ruger fkr anything?
Thanks for trying so hard to miss every point in the video 👌🏻
All my Rugers are great lolz XD. They are about all I shoot, right out of the box no issues once so ever.
Dam Ruger what is up with that shit . It is so sad they put together a nice pistol like that and it end up being shit job .
Wow, either you got a bad one or i got a good one.
That's the fun when you buy a ruger- you don't know which you'll get.
If you don't want a heavy ass gun for bug out then do not buy it... That simple. You can clearly see the weight on the spec sheet when viewing ruger's site www.ruger.com/products/markIVHunter/specSheets/40118.html.... And who has never seen screws back out on guns regardless of caliber? Essentially every gun I own with small sets of screws has issues with screws backing out. (after extensive round count of course). Applying blue locktite would cost how much? Monetarily or time wise I would say it wouldn't be that much of an inconvenience. Given the fact that you are a prepper you should most likely have a bottle of blue locktite laying around anyway lol. Right? I do not mean any trouble or disrespect because I have had my own issues with Rugers myself, but I have also had some issues with others such as NAA, Springfield Armory, Spikes, and even BCM.... All these jokers had to be sent back or had parts issues so all I can say is , shit happens folks.... Long gone are the days where you can just buy something and expect it to work perfectly... Murphey's law I suppose. I just think that if you want something to fit a specific role just do some more research on it. There are many other options that could have fit your needs better than this gun that would have been lighter weight in the same caliber, and hey there is always the option of something other than .22 lr as well.
Cool shirt..
I have a ruger mk iii that I love to shoot but hate to disasemble .I do have a target walther (sp22) that is the shit tho
I think the Mk3's were def solid shooters! I have been hearing about those Walthers a little bit in the comments, the new manufactures 22lr versions of their fighting pistols are pretty interesting!
You must be a Browning spokesman I have Ruger Mark 1 made in 1979 best damn 22 pistol I own shoots anything thanks for nothing
Good job for pointing out something that has absolutely nothing to do with the video.
Maybe you should base your opinion on the new camaro on one from 1979?
It still amazes me how stupid people advertise themselves to be.
👏🏻
Mine is a gem, my opinion.
Glad to hear it
Not to beat you man it's a good video. But that particular pistol you have is the finest 22lr pistol under $1500. It's not for backpacking. If that what your after buy a cheap semi auto mini version of a bigger gun like the glock 44
Under 1500!? Lol!
I would choose a buckmark over the ruger regardless of price- and im pretty sure options open WAY up even with volquartzen (sp) and tacsol below 1500.
The ruger has an okayish trigger, poor fit and finish, and mine came with cracked grips. Finest nothing.
Just buy a pac-lite upper, or buy a light weight model. I've seen a buckmark that was dropped, it broke in two. The damn things are made of pot metal. I agree though, Ruger QC is non-existant.
Mine works fine and is amazing idk what you are talking about?
amazing t shirt
How does it feel being one of the only people on RUclips! that trash talk a weapon that obviously out smarted you
How does it feel to publicly announce that you are too stupid to make a coherant thought or use first grade grammar?
I haven't had any problems with the 6 that I own.
You own 6 Mk4 Hunters?
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors Sorry for the confusion but I meant to say 6 Rugers.
Disenfranchised means you don't have the right to vote. I believe you ment you were disenchanted with the pistol.
Not entirely true. It means being deprived of SOME RIGHT, PRIVILEDGE or IMMUNITY. We are all here to watch a review of a pistol. Lets not waste time correcting his use of a word. and if you do.....please make sure you are correct. Grammar Police signing off.......
there comes another thumb down from germany.....!!!! rugers are nice guns never had probs...ya might do something wrong with the gun? aint ya??
Thumbs down is actually the literal best thing i can get to make videos go viral, so thanks for that.
As far as ruger quality, maybe if you didn't live as a slave in a socialist pit you could spend enough time with firearms to know what im talking about in this video, but clearly unless you move to the good ole' usa, you will never get that opportunity.
👍
Which.22 should i buy ?
If you are looking for a semi auto target style pistol i think the browning buckmark is the better gun
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors thank you for the answer. Almost everyone talking all good about ruger and I dont believe, i believe u when u said something wrong. Gonna look for Browling buckmark but model stainless steel weights the same and I think its more relible then polimer or aluminium ? Which one should I choose
But what if we did use loctite?
Hey buddy. I became a patron for $1 a month. Is that counterproductive? Or ok?
Dude that is AWESOME! Thank you! When you head to patreon, i believe i have 2 special videos so far, ill have another this week!
Okie dokie
He sounds like Kermit the frog
Sounds like you’re finding reasons to get rid of it. Cause you want another pistol lol.
@@MrPhoenix1800 I did want another pistol- which i got and have kept because it didn't have the issues of this particular mkiv
man all you have to do is blue loc tite a really good gun. and the buck mark cost twice as much as this gun. anyway are you selling it cause I'm in the marke?.
#1- i did loctite the gun- which i said in the video. Glad to know you didnt watch the whole thing.
#2- the browning buckmark is closer to half the price of this model of mkiv
#3- already sold.
Way to post an entirely stupid comment. 👍
Huh? Old vid but …….
It’s called a holster.
How many holsters do you want to wear at the same time?
Lol
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors if I’m hunting squirrel just need one. I agree I wouldn’t use for a bug out bag, I’d use a Henry survival rifle or something similar.
Which is why i sold it and got a henry ar7.
ThePreppersBunkerOutdoors 👍. I ordered a rugged oculus for my Mark iv hunter. Going to thread the barrel soon.
Let me know when you want to sell it!
@robertking2756 oh man it's years gone bud.
@robertking2756 I sold it and got a S&W 317 kit gun that also pissed me off and got sold haha
@@Thepreppersbunkeroutdoors ooooook!
So you bought a heavy pistol and then come here to complain to us about the weight? Then you complain about the screws coming loose. It literally takes 2 seconds to put a drop of loctite on a screw and it will never come loose again. Then you don’t like the trigger. There probably is no other gun on the planet that has so many aftermarket parts for including triggers.
@SavageVoyageur and yet for half the money I bought a buckmark that alleviates all those problems.
None of those issues alone were the issue necessarily-
It was those issues along with it costing like $800
"My pistol is 10oz too heavy" said no doomsday survivor ever.
Nobody said it was 10oz too heavy, but no real prepper ever questioned the importance of saving weight in a pack, because actually preppers ACTUALLY PREP. 👍🏻
Thank You for not buying Ruger again. They are great firearms and if you know what your doing with one, learn about what you have and make competent statements.
Luckily my competence isnt measured by random faceless internet warriors who lack any experience beyond their keyboard 👏🏻👌🏻
2 comments.
Use Loctite !
Wrong choice for Bug-Out !
Those sights are fail.
I have a Hunter and A 22/45 both have been service free why anyone would purchase a pistol at 40oz for a bug out bag needs to get a brain. Personally, I totally disagree with your review. I have unsubscribed
Just a few notes-
First- you were never subscribed, if you were, you wouldnt have just came here to share your stupid 5 years late.
Second- "i disagree" with nothing to back up your disagreement but an emotional statement is a sure sign of stupidity.
So thanks for stopping by and letting everyone know how stupid you are- it helps to frame future comments.
Yea this gun is awesome, can care less what a white Urkel with a fro hulk and some tough guy arm tats on a soy latte boy has to say about this gun. Ohhh would u look at this , would u look at that . Oh did i do that.
You will get a live video response tonight at 8 central! What an honor!
What the heck is the matter with you, besides being young and inexperienced? Keep an eye on your equipment and take care of it. I question your practical intelligence. You didn't know the weight of it before you bought it? Bad review,