This is the first video that I have seen and he is teaching a false doctrine which is leading people to the lake of fire. You can't understand Scripture by listening to people who teach false doctrines. Two channels that I highly recommend are unlearn the lies and 119 ministries. They back up what they teach with Scripture. Once you understand what Scripture actually says, you will spot false doctrines and there are many. The deception is great. Learn to let Scripture speak for itself and not from the mindset of what you are taught that it says. DO NOT interpret what it says to fit the lies that are being taught as if they are Scriptural facts. True Scriptural facts line up in harmony with Scripture as a whole and what he is teaching does not.
Something else, most Christians don't realize that not all of those who fled Egypt were Hebrews, others fled with them and Yahweh's laws applied to them also (Deuteronomy 29:11-12). Anyone who obeys Yahweh is grafted into the olive tree (Romans 11:17-25) which makes them Israelites in Yahweh's kingdom. You do not need to be a Jew to be an Israelite.
How is it that NO ONE understands what fulfilled means? He NEVER came to do AWAY with ANY law of the Father but to FULFILL THEM! He said that the Law is NOT DESTROYED! Thats His code of conduct that separates us from everyone else. Its what makes us Holy, set apart. He came to fulfill what was written about HIM!
We are in the time of great deception where men believe good to be bad and bad to be good.. we are now bad trying to follow the law 🤔.. men twist the scripture towards their own destruction 😞.. no law for lawless people.. lawlessness=sin we transgress the law we sin.. easier said than done but it is what it is.. We will not be saved following the law? Correct.. but because we are saved so we try to obey and follow.. it's the sign or fruit of the spirit that we are in Christ.. He said if you love me keep my commandments..
The law cannot be fulfilled.The law is to be obeyed or not.Yall got law mixed up with prophecy.Jesus did not fullfill the prophecy,so they invented a second coming to explain his failure.
@@stepbro4978 Yahushua fulfilled the law that was against us which is the penalty of death for breaking the law. This is the curse of the law that Paul wrote about. The law itself isn't against us. Most Christians don't understand that.
Even my kids love this channel! I haven't listened to you with my kids around in a while, and my son said, "Where is Corey?" It's funny how you've become part of our family. Lol
Why would the Lord lead you to false doctrines? If you read Scripture for what it actually says and not from the mindset of what you are taught, you would have spotted the lies.
Excellent breakdown Sir! 👏🏽👏🏽 So many don’t understand Christ fulfillment because they don’t read or they didn’t have a good teacher break it down for them.
I disagree with your first sentence but the rest is true but not what you think. A major problem is that people read Scripture from the mindset of what they were taught instead of what it actually says. They skip over what doesn't fit what they were taught that it says or they are conditioned not to see it. This is the first video of this channel but if he is this far off on this issue, it's hard for me to imagine that he would get many others right.
If you read what Scripture actually says and not from the mindset of what you are taught, it would be obvious that he was not edifying. The way most people are taught, they ignore some things that Yahushua said and choose to believe what they mistakenly think Paul said. Thus, they make Yahushua a liar and since Paul didn't say what they think Paul said, they make Paul a liar also.
Romans 10:4 Christ put a end to doing the law as a means to be deemed righteous... that does not mean he ended the law. He literally said he come not to destroy (which would end) it. fulfill means to "make full" - "fuller" - to give fuller understanding or meaning, just as he did in his teachings... EVERYTHING he taught was from the law sir, so to say the law is ended is like saying Jesus teachings has ended...
No need for the "Do you really.." Come on. Let's not do that in these comments. I could really reply with a "Do you really not understand how we are to love one another and help one another and treat one another" type of a comment. So let's not do that.
@@gilbertflores3380 Ok, I'm sorry for being frustrated, but wherever and whenever there is an explanation of these verses it strikes me that 90% of the people don't even fathom what they are claiming and the implications of their claims, and there are so many. These verses are formed in the if /then (until-unless/than) correlation. “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them BUT TO FULFIL them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law UNTIL ALL IS ACCOMPLISHED. When rephrased - it goes like this. IF the law is NOT FULFILLED/ACCOMPLISHED, than it will stay that way, without an iota changed, in full effect, UNTILL FOREVER AND EVER AND EVER. To fulfil something means to abide to it in every single, the smallest, point and part of it, until it's done (fulfilled / accomplished) Claiming that the Jesus DID NOT fulfil the law, means that He didn't led His life perfectly and sinlessly according to the law, that He didn't perfectly obey every single part of it, that His sacrifice on the cross was NOT enough to FINISH (FULFIL) the Law - MEANS - that Jesus died in vain. Means that YHWH's (Jesus's) sacrifice WAS NOT ENOUGH to finish (fulfil) HIS OWN LAW, so humans had to take over to finish HIS work and complete it by OUR WORKS. I hope that this will help. God bless.
@@MultiSky7most Christians don't read in context and only read what is pointed out to them. If they do read what wasn't pointed out, they ignore it. If you read what Scripture actually says, you will know that not all Israelites are Jews. Yahweh's laws apply to everyone. So he is in error twice.
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” Matthew 5:17 KJV “Fulfill” is the word “pleroo” and in this context it means to: Make gods words fully known. So Matthew 5:17 yeshua is saying he came to make the law and prophets understandable.
You talk a lot about the "jews" but bloodline doesn't really matter, and it never has. Caleb wasn't born an Israelite, but he was still a "jew", and all believers are Israelites.
The following proves you are correct. The most important genealogy in the Bible is found in Matthew 1:1, as confirmed by Paul in Gal. 3:16. Paul warns us against using "genealogies" in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9.
@@CalvinisimIsGarbage The following article reveals many of the problems with modern Dispensational Theology, which is less than 200 years old. It did not exist as a system of Bible interpretation before 1826. If you search the thousands of pages of commentaries and sermons written at the time of the American Revolutionary War, you will not find the "Two Peoples of God" doctrine. I realize you may already know these facts, but many modern Christians do not. Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
Only truly converted Christians are Israelites. Let's not get that twisted. There were plenty of heretical/apostate groups calling themselves Christian in the 1st century, but the apostles never referred to them as being part of the church. Being a believer is _not_ the same thing as being a Christian.
Pleroo is the Greek word for fulfill used in Matthew 5:17. It can mean to put an end to by way of completing; or it can mean to make fully known. In the context of the sermon on the mount, it obviously means to make it fully known as He taught about murder, adultery, divorce and treatment of neighbors. He made the spirit of the commandment known that it was a matter of the heart. So when He said that He did not come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill, He was making it fully known. He was being accused of doing away or changing the Law.
Here it means to make full. Yahushua came to fulfill the law that was against us, the law of the penalty of death for breaking the law, the law that was against us and that was the curse of the law. The rest of the law is for us. Yahweh has a law that provided a way out of the curse but Yahushua was the only one who could fulfill it. The law itself, or the prophets, will not change even the slightest until heaven and earth pass away and all is fulfilled.
The New Covenant covers both the Jews and Gentiles. When Jesus died on the cross, he was able to fulfill the law by sending the Holy Spirit to write his laws on our hearts. This causes us to love God's laws, and obey them. Disobedient Christians do not have the Law written on their hearts, and they are not covered by the New Covenant. They will still face the full penalty for sin that the law always required.
I don’t even know where to begin… You are wrong on many points. He is the GOAL of the law. Please don’t listen to this nonsense. You must study it yourself and study the words in the language it was written. Also, if anyone thinks the law was done away with please explain why the Yeshua kept the law and why the Apostles kept the law even after His resurrection???? Read and study the book of Revelation, even there it shows the law still stands.
No amount of law-keeping was good enough because the problem is the human heart. Jesus went on to illustrate how bankrupt their understanding of the law was by making comparison after comparison (you have heard that it was said. . . but I tell you; Matthew 5:21-22). For example, the Pharisees’ teaching implied that if a man avoided having sex with someone other than his spouse, then he had kept that portion of the law. Jesus, understanding the universality of human lust, filled the law out to the full by pointing out God’s original intention-because adultery is a matter of the heart, people regularly commit this sin through a single moment of lust in the mind. A careful examination of the remainder of the Sermon on the Mount reveals that virtually every point Jesus made draws a contrast between the pseudo-righteousness of the religious leaders and the true righteousness that God desires. The person who discovers and appropriates true righteousness will manifest the character qualities described in the Beatitudes (Matt 5:3-12) and will impact the world as described in Matt 5:13-16. The Pharisees did not. Jesus drew attention to the gravity of his foundational premise with the formula, I tell you. He equated himself with the author of Scripture which, of course, he was. Jesus insisted his words bore all the authority of God himself which, of course, he was. Jesus claimed deity for himself. Jesus was essentially declaring war on the false pharisaical religion. He insisted that no person could be saved by his or her own righteousness. This was something the law intended to indicate all along, but Israel had missed the point (Rom. 2:17-3:31; Gal. 3:17-29; 5:3-6). The point was hard for the self-righteous to swallow-no one, not even the super law-keeping Pharisees, could enter into heaven. All needed a Savior! Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior not Law keeping. Please read the Galatians as well, May Lord God be with you.
@@agustinrodriguez5058 I agree. Yes He came to show the law in a deeper sense. The Pharisees were 100% wrong to add to the law. No one should ever do that. Keeping the law will never get you into heaven. We could never earn it. Faith in the Messiah is the only way. But that doesn’t mean the law is done away with. We must still be obedient to our Creator. Throughout scripture there are plenty of examples of that. We show our love by our obedience. If the law is done away with then why did the Apostles keep it??
@@judithmargret5972many people mistakenly use these verses to show the law done away but fail to realize the commandments given by God show us HOW we are to love Him and each other. If you don’t know what He commands then people will worship Him like the pagans worship their gods. Which is EXACTLY what He warns us against in the Old Testament. Remember how Aaron’s sons died. God had just told them how He wanted to be worshipped and then they did their own thing and they were killed for it.
As an Israeli, I can say that we, who are called "Jews" by Gentiles, are also no longer bound by the Mosaic Law. It's fulfilled. Period. He writes His teaching (commandments, laws) upon ALL our hearts. Those who seek to defend the legalistic idea that we are all still under Torah-keeping requirements, they simply disbelieve the teachings of the apostles without injecting their theologies into the texts of scripture. Be free in Yahshuah, and love Him only, and He will guide you.
Be very careful guys, what is scripture is saying is that Christ is the end of keeping the law of God for obtaining salvation, not the outright end of keeping the laws of God. It was not an accident that Moses wasn't the one that ushered the Israelites into the promised land; Joshua or Jesus or yeshua did. But, Joshua/yeshua/Jesus did not usher them into the promise land lawlessly. This is the same way that Jesus/yeshua will lead his Israel into heaven and back to earth to set up his kingdom with God laws written in the hearts of his people.
That is not what the Bible teaches either. The word Paul uses in Rom. 10:4 is "telos", which means "goal/purpose". The message Paul was conveying is that Christ became the _goal_ of law-keeping. In other words, Christ became the example of how to abide by the law, and that having the mind of Christ is the purpose of law-keeping(Phl. 2:5).
@@theeternalsbeliever1779 "Christ became the goal of keeping the law, And we must have a mind of Christ" ... Is that not telling us that we must abide by the same laws that Christ upheld?
The penalty for breaking the law is death. Yahushua fulfilled the law that required His death and bloodshed in order for us to have mercy. Since we have all broken the law, we can't obtain salvation by keeping the law. But we are expected to keep the law. Yahushua Himself said that if we want to enter into life, keep the commandments (Matthew 19:17). Paul never taught differently but many deceived Christians think that he did.
The term "it is finished" is never used in Scripture to mean "paying a debt in full". It would be good to look into the term and how Scripture uses it.
Didn't Paul, or whoever wrote Hebrews, twist Psalms 40:6 badly? Psalms 40:6 does not say "but a body you prepared for me" as the writer of Hebrews said. It says "my ears you have opened". Jesus said that the greatest commandment to love God and our neighbor as ourselves fulfills all the law and the prophets and to treat others as we want them to treat us is the sum of the law and the prophets. Paul said all the commandments of the law are fulfilled if we love God and our neighbor as ourselves (Romans 13:8-10, also Galatians 5:14 and 5:22). It seems love for God, self, and neighbor was Jesus message which he demonstrated in the most undeniable way.
It means we as Born again Believers we're to fess-up when we're wrong ! Especially proven wrong by Your own court transcript. All You need to do is publicly say that "You were wrong" not like Jimmy Swaggart did with tears but in Word. Love you bro and I advice you as I'd do to myself. 😊 Are we our own enemy when we don't speak or confess the truth ?😢 it takes heart bro.
People that are so giddy to fantasize that Christ did away with the 10 commandments refuse to acknowledge that three verses after “Think not that I am come to destroy the law…” He explains exactly what he means beginning in verse 21. Christ came to Exemplify the Spiritual Dimension to the 10 commandments which He CLEARLY explains beginning with verse 21. OT Israel failed to keep the letter of the law, it was impossible for them to keep the Spirit of the law as they didn’t have God’s Holy Spirit(they weren’t even offered it). It’s impossible to keep the spirit of the law(10 commandments) without keeping the letter of the law as Christ so clearly explains in the rest of the Sermon on the Mount! Whoever this presenter is is taking the viewer on some needless scriptural goose chase trying to make a non pertinent point when the crystal clear explanation is merely 3 verses away!
The house of Israel is not Jewish. The house of Israel consist of the northern 10 tribes that rebelled against the throne of David during the reign of his grandson Rehoboam. They were lost to secular history after God sent the Assyrians to enslave them( 2 Kin. 17:5-18). That is why Christ referred to them as "lost". The Jews are part of the nation of Israel, but they are the house of _Judah_ .
Just a thought: if marriage licenses allow for divorce for any reason and the Bible says let no man separate what God has put together, should Christians get marriage licenses? This license goes directly against the word of God and the marriage laws of all 50 states do not even mention God. Good video by the way!
I would say that just because something is permissible by law doesn't mean it is permissible by God. Believers are held to a higher authority. We obey the law of the land as long as we are not disobeying God. Romans 13:1 says, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God." So if governments are instituted by God and marriage is a legal union in most places, I don't know a place that doesn't consider marriage a legal union, I think we should follow God's command by subjecting ourselves to our authorities and get married in the eyes of the state. Because I believe that is being married in the sight of God as well since He is Who created these institutions. So no, I don't think we would be disobeying God by getting marriage licenses. We would be in sin if we were to get an unjustified divorce.
@@lifeofapsalmist thoughts on common law marriage. Just because man says it's okay....is it okay to shack up for a few years? Is marriage license even biblical? We are married to Christ, we confessed with our mouths and believe, we don't sign paper work.
@@Octavius634 When the apostles were arrested they appeared before the High Priest and the council and were told to not preach Jesus. The apostles said this to them, Acts 5:29 "But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men." When asked if they should pay taxes, Jesus said this, Mark 12:17 "Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they marveled at him." We obey man as long as we are not disobeying God. We have a duty to obey both, but God trumps government if government is telling us to do something sinful. I believe getting a marriage license is absolutely biblical. Because, like that verse says, Romans 13:1, God Himself set up government. All authority that exists was set up by Him. Really think about that reality. If He set up authorities and authorities made laws about what constitutes a marriage, who are we to think we can get married in some other way? Yes, we are married to Christ and that is what marriage on earth is a representation of. What if God, in His wisdom and power, was the One who preserved marriage by making it a legal union in most countries so we can have something to compare marriage with Christ to? Yes, we don’t sign paper work. God did. God did the work to reconcile us. Colossians 1:22 “he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him,” This verse is proving that our marriage to Christ did not come by accident, something had to happen. Marriage is intentional. Especially for the man, because the man represents Christ and the woman the Church. In the same way Christ took the initiative, so too should men. I want to make a further point about God doing the work of reconciliation... We also had to make a decision. We had to say "yes" to this marriage with Christ. It didn't come by happenstance. This further proves that marriage isn't something that happens over the course of time. Marriage is a decision that you make before God and before men. When it comes to common law marriage. My personal opinion is that people opt for it when they are indecisive and don't want to be committed. The opposite of marriage. By definition, common law marriage is two people that have been living together for a long time and do married things so they then become recognized as “married” by the state. But by definition... they never got a marriage license, they never had a ceremony, they never made vows to be with one another until death due them part. I think it’s sin, if you have to live like you are married for a couple of years to actually be married it's sin. That's where we obey God rather than man. If man tells us we can become married by living in sin, we say no. Romans 12:17 “Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.”
Another thought, where in Scripture does it say that we need to pay for permission from the government to get married? Israel had marriage customs but I don't see anywhere in Scripture that that is a commandment. Before that, there was no custom. So does the government have the authority to say who can get married or does Yahweh?
@smartchristians Sir, would you consider it to be right to assume that Jesus had the drink offering when He was given the wine before He said it is finished. As in everything for an offering was presented.
Well, I'm not sure that fits the definition and requirement of a drink offering, however one could draw a parallel of the drink offering and Christ's blood being poured out. Because of your question, I think we should give some attention to it in a video. Thank you my sister
@@smartchristians thank you for replying sir. I was thinking His blood as well. That could be a drink offering but i also thought, the blood was sprinkled on the altar. Looking forward to the video.
@@ofentsetseleI'm not sure if this is true or not but it does sound like something Yahweh would do. If I remember correctly, a guy named Ron Wyatt claims that he found the ark of the covenant. It was two tunnels below where Yahushua was crucified. He said that there was a crack above the ark. We do know for certain that there was an earthquake so it's possible that the cracks came from that. There was blood on the ark and he had it tested and it was human blood but it only had the chromosomes of one parent plus one. There is only one human that would not have the chromosomes of two parents. If this is true, that means that Yahweh kept His own law.
There are laws for women too in the Torah, how did Jesus fulfil those if he was a man? Jesus also didn't have kids. One of the commands is to be fruitful and multiply.
Rav Yeshua-ha-nazrei said " Think not that I came to abandoned Mitzvah ( Law) and the Naviim ( Prophets). Matt 5:17 . Then Paul comes along who never actually met Jesus during his earthly ministry 3-5 years later said the law was a "curse" and theologians agree Paul added to Rav Yeshua's teachings when Yeshua said it was "finished on the cross". If Paul was sent by Yeshua why didn't he speak of someone coming after him to add to his teaching? Yeshua only warned of false prophets coming after him. Jesus the messiah taught belief/works salvation. Luke 3:8 Paul's Gospel is justification by faith alone.
The Bible plainly teaches in Colssiaans that the only thing that was nailed to the stake was a Christian's sin record prior to their conversion. The Bible doesn't show any of God's laws being nailed to it, as ALL of them provide spiritual instruction on how to live a godly life.
The Law still stands. A NEW COVENANT was ADDED to the law. All of Gods comments still stand. God never removed the standards. Leviticus and Deuteronomy explain in detail with examples what The Law is. What SIN is. Jesus was the atonement or the sacrifice. For Sin. Our Sin.
Everything that came after Yehoshua the teacher of what is called the Matthew gospel is of the false christ created after the gospel, after the good news preached in the gospel, that christ is false, a deception its name jesus and its cross never happened except in the man of sins lying epistles, the writings of Paul of tarsus and the rest of the ones who come in the name if jesus and not in the name of God alone as all true lost sheep will. We serve God alone not any christ! I know God, I walk in covenant with God and I Love God. I fear God as well and that is the beginning of Love because until you fear disobeying God and causing God to look upon you in shame so you feel horrible then you can not love Him. I started this walk when I was 32, to look for God. I started to actually begin to find God when I was 39 and sealed myself to God as the gospel tells us to, those of us who listen to the gospel teacher and not the ones who came after him, know to take up the commandments of God and to seek out our roots back to Abraham and to Moses and Yehoshua and the prophets so we become firm in knowledge of what GOD ALONE asked of us. It took me several years of fighting sin and the devil by obeying God. I fought the sin out of me with God's help, by his instructions in the written word. It is a very narrow road and as the mattan/Matthew gospel says very few will find it. We have to fight Satan and the whole world that serves him in sin in order to get out and the one who will help is God alone because we can't trust anyone else. I am with God, God provides for myself and my family and yes there is absolutely evidence BUT not until you absolutely come clean, in thought, word and deed, the absolute opposite of all the lying religions. The gospel was sent down to free us from sin by sending us to our teacher and if you reject it then you are freed from God into sin perpetually and to death spiritually from God which as I can now see is absolutely hell on earth, your light you pretend to have is absolutely darkness caused by your unwillingness to even try to obey God. I speak to 99% of the population. If you can't put everyone first after God and stop yourself from all sin THEN YOUR NOT WORTHY AND YOU ARE ALREADY FINISHED BEFORE YOU EVEN STARTED. So come out of all sun, take up the commandments and begin your battle, call to GOD ALONE, LEARN YOUR ROOTS, BE GOD'S PEOPLE. FIGHT SATAN WHO IS THE SINNERS INNER VOICE, THE CONSCIENCE THAT LEADS YOU TO HURT YOU, that's not you, it's Satan the deceiver. If you come to God and pass the trials cleansing yourself by obedience then GOD WILL BECOME YOUR CONSCIENCE AND YOU WILL LOVE GOD AND HATE SIN, SATAN WILL FLEE FROM YOU. SO there it is. Peace, the ball in in your court Be wary of this world, it is the valley of death, you need God's light and God doesn't dwell with sin or sinners. Not until they begin the journey to stop sin.
You still sin, you are still under the law, you broke the law and you feel bad but you didn't feel bad while you were breaking it, did you? Why did you feel guilty afterwards? Are you not under grace and not the law? You don't believe that you will never, past and future, stop sinning until you get to heaven, because thats what Gods word tells you, why feel guilty if God tells you that? If that is Gods will for you? Are you not doing what God is telling you? Even though Jesus tells you to go and sin no more?
You are wrong about Jews being first into the body of Christ church. Israel has it's own separate church. The body of Christ does not begin until the conversion of Apostle Paul in Acts chapter 9. 2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. We are not born again, we are a totally new creation!
Corey, if these short teachings don't help anyone, they definitely help me. Thank you so much.
Amen. Me too! Shorter is better for me
@@cowel8734 it's good for me Bec of my attention span🤣
Same friend, same! I'm trying to catch up. He's been poppin out lots of videos.
@@jasminesmith5447 🙏🙏🙏
@@tyrarice7318Same❤
I so love this channel. Thank you for all the biblical wisdom. Your videos have helped me to understand many parts of the bible. God bless you, sir!
This is the first video that I have seen and he is teaching a false doctrine which is leading people to the lake of fire. You can't understand Scripture by listening to people who teach false doctrines.
Two channels that I highly recommend are unlearn the lies and 119 ministries. They back up what they teach with Scripture. Once you understand what Scripture actually says, you will spot false doctrines and there are many. The deception is great. Learn to let Scripture speak for itself and not from the mindset of what you are taught that it says. DO NOT interpret what it says to fit the lies that are being taught as if they are Scriptural facts.
True Scriptural facts line up in harmony with Scripture as a whole and what he is teaching does not.
Something else, most Christians don't realize that not all of those who fled Egypt were Hebrews, others fled with them and Yahweh's laws applied to them also (Deuteronomy 29:11-12). Anyone who obeys Yahweh is grafted into the olive tree (Romans 11:17-25) which makes them Israelites in Yahweh's kingdom. You do not need to be a Jew to be an Israelite.
How is it that NO ONE understands what fulfilled means? He NEVER came to do AWAY with ANY law of the Father but to FULFILL THEM! He said that the Law is NOT DESTROYED! Thats His code of conduct that separates us from everyone else. Its what makes us Holy, set apart. He came to fulfill what was written about HIM!
We are in the time of great deception where men believe good to be bad and bad to be good.. we are now bad trying to follow the law 🤔.. men twist the scripture towards their own destruction 😞.. no law for lawless people.. lawlessness=sin we transgress the law we sin.. easier said than done but it is what it is..
We will not be saved following the law? Correct.. but because we are saved so we try to obey and follow.. it's the sign or fruit of the spirit that we are in Christ.. He said if you love me keep my commandments..
The law cannot be fulfilled.The law is to be obeyed or not.Yall got law mixed up with prophecy.Jesus did not fullfill the prophecy,so they invented a second coming to explain his failure.
@@stepbro4978 Yahushua fulfilled the law that was against us which is the penalty of death for breaking the law. This is the curse of the law that Paul wrote about. The law itself isn't against us. Most Christians don't understand that.
The law is done away with for RIGHTEOUSNESS so saved by faith but laws are not abolished
@@trainerstanleystewart4792 show me a verse anywhere in the Bible that states the laws are done away with.
Even my kids love this channel! I haven't listened to you with my kids around in a while, and my son said, "Where is Corey?" It's funny how you've become part of our family. Lol
Thanks for the video brother Cory I’m happy that The LORD lead me too your channel really appreciated praise The LORD
The Lord led me to this channel about a year and a half ago. This has been a blessing to my walk and pursuit of a greater knowledge of God's word.
Why would the Lord lead you to false doctrines? If you read Scripture for what it actually says and not from the mindset of what you are taught, you would have spotted the lies.
Amen. Thank you Jesus👑
Amen. Thank you Lord Jesus for fulfilling The Law by your sacrifice on the cross!
Bless the Lord, Amen🕊️
Amen to the truth. I have never heard the word so plainly put.
May God continue to bless you Sir.
The problem is that he didn't tell the truth. He is passing along a false doctrine that he was taught and doesn't line up with Scripture.
In that he obeyed. Obedience is greater than sacrifice.
I'm not disagreeing with what you said but I'm not sure if you know what you said. Obedience to what?
Amen thank you Lord 🙏
Thank you brother and God bless
Excellent breakdown Sir! 👏🏽👏🏽 So many don’t understand Christ fulfillment because they don’t read or they didn’t have a good teacher break it down for them.
I disagree with your first sentence but the rest is true but not what you think. A major problem is that people read Scripture from the mindset of what they were taught instead of what it actually says. They skip over what doesn't fit what they were taught that it says or they are conditioned not to see it.
This is the first video of this channel but if he is this far off on this issue, it's hard for me to imagine that he would get many others right.
Amen
I have to Share these on Facebook, love they are edifying and short and to the point.❤
Problem is that what he said doesn't line up with Scripture.
If you read what Scripture actually says and not from the mindset of what you are taught, it would be obvious that he was not edifying. The way most people are taught, they ignore some things that Yahushua said and choose to believe what they mistakenly think Paul said. Thus, they make Yahushua a liar and since Paul didn't say what they think Paul said, they make Paul a liar also.
Romans 10:4 Christ put a end to doing the law as a means to be deemed righteous...
that does not mean he ended the law. He literally said he come not to destroy (which would end) it.
fulfill means to "make full" - "fuller" - to give fuller understanding or meaning, just as he did in his teachings... EVERYTHING he taught was from the law sir, so to say the law is ended is like saying Jesus teachings has ended...
Thank you.
Thank you.❤😊
Amen my brother
I wish you would have add verse 18. "Till heaven and earth pass away"
Do you really don't understand "if / then", "until / then" concept and relation??
No need for the "Do you really.."
Come on. Let's not do that in these comments.
I could really reply with a "Do you really not understand how we are to love one another and help one another and treat one another" type of a comment.
So let's not do that.
@@gilbertflores3380 Ok, I'm sorry for being frustrated, but wherever and whenever there is an explanation of these verses it strikes me that 90% of the people don't even fathom what they are claiming and the implications of their claims, and there are so many.
These verses are formed in the if /then (until-unless/than) correlation.
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them BUT TO FULFIL them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law UNTIL ALL IS ACCOMPLISHED.
When rephrased - it goes like this.
IF the law is NOT FULFILLED/ACCOMPLISHED, than it will stay that way, without an iota changed, in full effect, UNTILL FOREVER AND EVER AND EVER.
To fulfil something means to abide to it in every single, the smallest, point and part of it, until it's done (fulfilled / accomplished)
Claiming that the Jesus DID NOT fulfil the law, means that He didn't led His life perfectly and sinlessly according to the law, that He didn't perfectly obey every single part of it, that His sacrifice on the cross was NOT enough to FINISH (FULFIL) the Law - MEANS - that Jesus died in vain.
Means that YHWH's (Jesus's) sacrifice WAS NOT ENOUGH to finish (fulfil) HIS OWN LAW, so humans had to take over to finish HIS work and complete it by OUR WORKS.
I hope that this will help.
God bless.
@@MultiSky7most Christians don't read in context and only read what is pointed out to them. If they do read what wasn't pointed out, they ignore it.
If you read what Scripture actually says, you will know that not all Israelites are Jews. Yahweh's laws apply to everyone. So he is in error twice.
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”
Matthew 5:17 KJV
“Fulfill” is the word “pleroo” and in this context it means to: Make gods words fully known.
So Matthew 5:17 yeshua is saying he came to make the law and prophets understandable.
You talk a lot about the "jews" but bloodline doesn't really matter, and it never has. Caleb wasn't born an Israelite, but he was still a "jew", and all believers are Israelites.
The following proves you are correct. The most important genealogy in the Bible is found in Matthew 1:1, as confirmed by Paul in Gal. 3:16. Paul warns us against using "genealogies" in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9.
@@SpotterVideo unfortunately Mr. Minor is a hyper dispensationalist. They put a pretty big emphasis on the "jews" "race"... to just put it bluntly
@@CalvinisimIsGarbage The following article reveals many of the problems with modern Dispensational Theology, which is less than 200 years old. It did not exist as a system of Bible interpretation before 1826. If you search the thousands of pages of commentaries and sermons written at the time of the American Revolutionary War, you will not find the "Two Peoples of God" doctrine. I realize you may already know these facts, but many modern Christians do not.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
Only truly converted Christians are Israelites. Let's not get that twisted. There were plenty of heretical/apostate groups calling themselves Christian in the 1st century, but the apostles never referred to them as being part of the church. Being a believer is _not_ the same thing as being a Christian.
Caleb was an Israelite from the tribe of Judah (Numbers 13:6
Thanks
Pleroo is the Greek word for fulfill used in Matthew 5:17. It can mean to put an end to by way of completing; or it can mean to make fully known. In the context of the sermon on the mount, it obviously means to make it fully known as He taught about murder, adultery, divorce and treatment of neighbors. He made the spirit of the commandment known that it was a matter of the heart. So when He said that He did not come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill, He was making it fully known. He was being accused of doing away or changing the Law.
Here it means to make full. Yahushua came to fulfill the law that was against us, the law of the penalty of death for breaking the law, the law that was against us and that was the curse of the law. The rest of the law is for us.
Yahweh has a law that provided a way out of the curse but Yahushua was the only one who could fulfill it. The law itself, or the prophets, will not change even the slightest until heaven and earth pass away and all is fulfilled.
good teaching corey.
The New Covenant covers both the Jews and Gentiles.
When Jesus died on the cross, he was able to fulfill the law by sending the Holy Spirit to write his laws on our hearts. This causes us to love God's laws, and obey them. Disobedient Christians do not have the Law written on their hearts, and they are not covered by the New Covenant. They will still face the full penalty for sin that the law always required.
Thanks!
Than you
I don’t even know where to begin…
You are wrong on many points. He is the GOAL of the law. Please don’t listen to this nonsense. You must study it yourself and study the words in the language it was written. Also, if anyone thinks the law was done away with please explain why the Yeshua kept the law and why the Apostles kept the law even after His resurrection???? Read and study the book of Revelation, even there it shows the law still stands.
Mathew 22:34-40
No amount of law-keeping was good enough because the problem is the human heart. Jesus went on to illustrate how bankrupt their understanding of the law was by making comparison after comparison (you have heard that it was said. . . but I tell you; Matthew 5:21-22). For example, the Pharisees’ teaching implied that if a man avoided having sex with someone other than his spouse, then he had kept that portion of the law. Jesus, understanding the universality of human lust, filled the law out to the full by pointing out God’s original intention-because adultery is a matter of the heart, people regularly commit this sin through a single moment of lust in the mind.
A careful examination of the remainder of the Sermon on the Mount reveals that virtually every point Jesus made draws a contrast between the pseudo-righteousness of the religious leaders and the true righteousness that God desires. The person who discovers and appropriates true righteousness will manifest the character qualities described in the Beatitudes (Matt 5:3-12) and will impact the world as described in Matt 5:13-16. The Pharisees did not.
Jesus drew attention to the gravity of his foundational premise with the formula, I tell you. He equated himself with the author of Scripture which, of course, he was. Jesus insisted his words bore all the authority of God himself which, of course, he was. Jesus claimed deity for himself.
Jesus was essentially declaring war on the false pharisaical religion. He insisted that no person could be saved by his or her own righteousness. This was something the law intended to indicate all along, but Israel had missed the point (Rom. 2:17-3:31; Gal. 3:17-29; 5:3-6). The point was hard for the self-righteous to swallow-no one, not even the super law-keeping Pharisees, could enter into heaven. All needed a Savior! Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior not Law keeping. Please read the Galatians as well, May Lord God be with you.
@@agustinrodriguez5058 I agree. Yes He came to show the law in a deeper sense. The Pharisees were 100% wrong to add to the law. No one should ever do that. Keeping the law will never get you into heaven. We could never earn it. Faith in the Messiah is the only way. But that doesn’t mean the law is done away with. We must still be obedient to our Creator. Throughout scripture there are plenty of examples of that. We show our love by our obedience. If the law is done away with then why did the Apostles keep it??
@@judithmargret5972many people mistakenly use these verses to show the law done away but fail to realize the commandments given by God show us HOW we are to love Him and each other. If you don’t know what He commands then people will worship Him like the pagans worship their gods. Which is EXACTLY what He warns us against in the Old Testament. Remember how Aaron’s sons died. God had just told them how He wanted to be worshipped and then they did their own thing and they were killed for it.
@@agustinrodriguez5058also, yes I have read Galatians. Have you read Leviticus???
Please show me the new covenant in scripture.
New covenant
Hebrews 8:8-12
(Jeremiah 31:31~34)
Hi Corey please can you tell me the software you use on screen looks very helpful ?
As an Israeli, I can say that we, who are called "Jews" by Gentiles, are also no longer bound by the Mosaic Law. It's fulfilled. Period. He writes His teaching (commandments, laws) upon ALL our hearts. Those who seek to defend the legalistic idea that we are all still under Torah-keeping requirements, they simply disbelieve the teachings of the apostles without injecting their theologies into the texts of scripture. Be free in Yahshuah, and love Him only, and He will guide you.
Be very careful guys, what is scripture is saying is that Christ is the end of keeping the law of God for obtaining salvation, not the outright end of keeping the laws of God. It was not an accident that Moses wasn't the one that ushered the Israelites into the promised land; Joshua or Jesus or yeshua did. But, Joshua/yeshua/Jesus did not usher them into the promise land lawlessly.
This is the same way that Jesus/yeshua will lead his Israel into heaven and back to earth to set up his kingdom with God laws written in the hearts of his people.
That is not what the Bible teaches either. The word Paul uses in Rom. 10:4 is "telos", which means "goal/purpose". The message Paul was conveying is that Christ became the _goal_ of law-keeping. In other words, Christ became the example of how to abide by the law, and that having the mind of Christ is the purpose of law-keeping(Phl. 2:5).
@@theeternalsbeliever1779 "Christ became the goal of keeping the law, And we must have a mind of Christ" ... Is that not telling us that we must abide by the same laws that Christ upheld?
The penalty for breaking the law is death. Yahushua fulfilled the law that required His death and bloodshed in order for us to have mercy. Since we have all broken the law, we can't obtain salvation by keeping the law. But we are expected to keep the law. Yahushua Himself said that if we want to enter into life, keep the commandments (Matthew 19:17). Paul never taught differently but many deceived Christians think that he did.
The term "it is finished" is never used in Scripture to mean "paying a debt in full". It would be good to look into the term and how Scripture uses it.
Didn't Paul, or whoever wrote Hebrews, twist Psalms 40:6 badly? Psalms 40:6 does not say "but a body you prepared for me" as the writer of Hebrews said. It says "my ears you have opened". Jesus said that the greatest commandment to love God and our neighbor as ourselves fulfills all the law and the prophets and to treat others as we want them to treat us is the sum of the law and the prophets. Paul said all the commandments of the law are fulfilled if we love God and our neighbor as ourselves (Romans 13:8-10, also Galatians 5:14 and 5:22). It seems love for God, self, and neighbor was Jesus message which he demonstrated in the most undeniable way.
Are you saying that there are separate laws for so-called jews and so-called gentiles? Where is this in Scripture?
I've never seen anyone prove it without contradicting Scripture.
Thanks, I'm sending this to my Jewish friend right now.
It means we as Born again Believers we're to fess-up when we're wrong ! Especially proven wrong by Your own court transcript. All You need to do is publicly say that "You were wrong" not like Jimmy Swaggart did with tears but in Word. Love you bro and I advice you as I'd do to myself. 😊 Are we our own enemy when we don't speak or confess the truth ?😢 it takes heart bro.
People that are so giddy to fantasize that Christ did away with the 10 commandments refuse to acknowledge that three verses after “Think not that I am come to destroy the law…” He explains exactly what he means beginning in verse 21. Christ came to Exemplify the Spiritual Dimension to the 10 commandments which He CLEARLY explains beginning with verse 21. OT Israel failed to keep the letter of the law, it was impossible for them to keep the Spirit of the law as they didn’t have God’s Holy Spirit(they weren’t even offered it). It’s impossible to keep the spirit of the law(10 commandments) without keeping the letter of the law as Christ so clearly explains in the rest of the Sermon on the Mount! Whoever this presenter is is taking the viewer on some needless scriptural goose chase trying to make a non pertinent point when the crystal clear explanation is merely 3 verses away!
He was only ever talking to Jews. Remember I am sent only to the Lost sheep of the house of Israel. When was he not speaking to Jews?
The house of Israel is not Jewish. The house of Israel consist of the northern 10 tribes that rebelled against the throne of David during the reign of his grandson Rehoboam. They were lost to secular history after God sent the Assyrians to enslave them( 2 Kin. 17:5-18). That is why Christ referred to them as "lost". The Jews are part of the nation of Israel, but they are the house of _Judah_ .
Just a thought: if marriage licenses allow for divorce for any reason and the Bible says let no man separate what God has put together, should Christians get marriage licenses? This license goes directly against the word of God and the marriage laws of all 50 states do not even mention God. Good video by the way!
I would say that just because something is permissible by law doesn't mean it is permissible by God. Believers are held to a higher authority. We obey the law of the land as long as we are not disobeying God. Romans 13:1 says, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God." So if governments are instituted by God and marriage is a legal union in most places, I don't know a place that doesn't consider marriage a legal union, I think we should follow God's command by subjecting ourselves to our authorities and get married in the eyes of the state. Because I believe that is being married in the sight of God as well since He is Who created these institutions.
So no, I don't think we would be disobeying God by getting marriage licenses. We would be in sin if we were to get an unjustified divorce.
@@lifeofapsalmist thoughts on common law marriage. Just because man says it's okay....is it okay to shack up for a few years? Is marriage license even biblical? We are married to Christ, we confessed with our mouths and believe, we don't sign paper work.
@@Octavius634 When the apostles were arrested they appeared before the High Priest and the council and were told to not preach Jesus. The apostles said this to them, Acts 5:29 "But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men."
When asked if they should pay taxes, Jesus said this, Mark 12:17 "Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they marveled at him."
We obey man as long as we are not disobeying God. We have a duty to obey both, but God trumps government if government is telling us to do something sinful.
I believe getting a marriage license is absolutely biblical. Because, like that verse says, Romans 13:1, God Himself set up government. All authority that exists was set up by Him. Really think about that reality. If He set up authorities and authorities made laws about what constitutes a marriage, who are we to think we can get married in some other way?
Yes, we are married to Christ and that is what marriage on earth is a representation of. What if God, in His wisdom and power, was the One who preserved marriage by making it a legal union in most countries so we can have something to compare marriage with Christ to?
Yes, we don’t sign paper work. God did. God did the work to reconcile us.
Colossians 1:22 “he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him,”
This verse is proving that our marriage to Christ did not come by accident, something had to happen. Marriage is intentional. Especially for the man, because the man represents Christ and the woman the Church. In the same way Christ took the initiative, so too should men.
I want to make a further point about God doing the work of reconciliation... We also had to make a decision. We had to say "yes" to this marriage with Christ. It didn't come by happenstance. This further proves that marriage isn't something that happens over the course of time. Marriage is a decision that you make before God and before men.
When it comes to common law marriage. My personal opinion is that people opt for it when they are indecisive and don't want to be committed. The opposite of marriage. By definition, common law marriage is two people that have been living together for a long time and do married things so they then become recognized as “married” by the state. But by definition... they never got a marriage license, they never had a ceremony, they never made vows to be with one another until death due them part. I think it’s sin, if you have to live like you are married for a couple of years to actually be married it's sin. That's where we obey God rather than man. If man tells us we can become married by living in sin, we say no.
Romans 12:17 “Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.”
Another thought, where in Scripture does it say that we need to pay for permission from the government to get married? Israel had marriage customs but I don't see anywhere in Scripture that that is a commandment. Before that, there was no custom.
So does the government have the authority to say who can get married or does Yahweh?
Blood sacrifices are for unintentional sin.Human sacrifice is forbidden at all times and places.
@smartchristians
Sir, would you consider it to be right to assume that Jesus had the drink offering when He was given the wine before He said it is finished. As in everything for an offering was presented.
Well, I'm not sure that fits the definition and requirement of a drink offering, however one could draw a parallel of the drink offering and Christ's blood being poured out. Because of your question, I think we should give some attention to it in a video. Thank you my sister
@@smartchristians thank you for replying sir. I was thinking His blood as well. That could be a drink offering but i also thought, the blood was sprinkled on the altar.
Looking forward to the video.
@@ofentsetseleI'm not sure if this is true or not but it does sound like something Yahweh would do. If I remember correctly, a guy named Ron Wyatt claims that he found the ark of the covenant. It was two tunnels below where Yahushua was crucified. He said that there was a crack above the ark. We do know for certain that there was an earthquake so it's possible that the cracks came from that. There was blood on the ark and he had it tested and it was human blood but it only had the chromosomes of one parent plus one. There is only one human that would not have the chromosomes of two parents.
If this is true, that means that Yahweh kept His own law.
There are laws for women too in the Torah, how did Jesus fulfil those if he was a man? Jesus also didn't have kids. One of the commands is to be fruitful and multiply.
Great point, I never thought of that. That would mean that women have no chance of salvation.
Why didn't you read " until heaven and earth pass away"?
Because that contradicts his point.
By being nailed to the cross
Rav Yeshua-ha-nazrei said " Think not that I came to abandoned Mitzvah ( Law) and the Naviim ( Prophets). Matt 5:17 . Then Paul comes along who never actually met Jesus during his earthly ministry 3-5 years later said the law was a "curse" and theologians agree Paul added to Rav Yeshua's teachings when Yeshua said it was "finished on the cross". If Paul was sent by Yeshua why didn't he speak of someone coming after him to add to his teaching? Yeshua only warned of false prophets coming after him. Jesus the messiah taught belief/works salvation. Luke 3:8 Paul's Gospel is justification by faith alone.
The Bible plainly teaches in Colssiaans that the only thing that was nailed to the stake was a Christian's sin record prior to their conversion. The Bible doesn't show any of God's laws being nailed to it, as ALL of them provide spiritual instruction on how to live a godly life.
@@theeternalsbeliever1779 Christians ??? Who sin records???? Did u listen to the video at all
@@oracleofthemosthigh613are you saying that Paul is wrong?
The Law still stands. A NEW COVENANT was ADDED to the law. All of Gods comments still stand. God never removed the standards. Leviticus and Deuteronomy explain in detail with examples what The Law is. What SIN is.
Jesus was the atonement or the sacrifice. For Sin. Our Sin.
@@perazdera2827 it’s not mine. It’s Gods
Everything that came after Yehoshua the teacher of what is called the Matthew gospel is of the false christ created after the gospel, after the good news preached in the gospel, that christ is false, a deception its name jesus and its cross never happened except in the man of sins lying epistles, the writings of Paul of tarsus and the rest of the ones who come in the name if jesus and not in the name of God alone as all true lost sheep will. We serve God alone not any christ!
I know God, I walk in covenant with God and I Love God. I fear God as well and that is the beginning of Love because until you fear disobeying God and causing God to look upon you in shame so you feel horrible then you can not love Him. I started this walk when I was 32, to look for God. I started to actually begin to find God when I was 39 and sealed myself to God as the gospel tells us to, those of us who listen to the gospel teacher and not the ones who came after him, know to take up the commandments of God and to seek out our roots back to Abraham and to Moses and Yehoshua and the prophets so we become firm in knowledge of what GOD ALONE asked of us. It took me several years of fighting sin and the devil by obeying God. I fought the sin out of me with God's help, by his instructions in the written word. It is a very narrow road and as the mattan/Matthew gospel says very few will find it. We have to fight Satan and the whole world that serves him in sin in order to get out and the one who will help is God alone because we can't trust anyone else. I am with God, God provides for myself and my family and yes there is absolutely evidence BUT not until you absolutely come clean, in thought, word and deed, the absolute opposite of all the lying religions. The gospel was sent down to free us from sin by sending us to our teacher and if you reject it then you are freed from God into sin perpetually and to death spiritually from God which as I can now see is absolutely hell on earth, your light you pretend to have is absolutely darkness caused by your unwillingness to even try to obey God. I speak to 99% of the population. If you can't put everyone first after God and stop yourself from all sin THEN YOUR NOT WORTHY AND YOU ARE ALREADY FINISHED BEFORE YOU EVEN STARTED.
So come out of all sun, take up the commandments and begin your battle, call to GOD ALONE, LEARN YOUR ROOTS, BE GOD'S PEOPLE. FIGHT SATAN WHO IS THE SINNERS INNER VOICE, THE CONSCIENCE THAT LEADS YOU TO HURT YOU, that's not you, it's Satan the deceiver. If you come to God and pass the trials cleansing yourself by obedience then GOD WILL BECOME YOUR CONSCIENCE AND YOU WILL LOVE GOD AND HATE SIN, SATAN WILL FLEE FROM YOU.
SO there it is.
Peace, the ball in in your court
Be wary of this world, it is the valley of death, you need God's light and God doesn't dwell with sin or sinners. Not until they begin the journey to stop sin.
testify again to every man who receives circumcision that he is bound to keep the whole law.
Jesus fulfilled the law perfectly by simply coming into the world as the Father.
Where in Scripture does it say that Yahushua came as the Father? There's plenty of places where it says the Son, but I have never read Father.
Gentiles had no Torah law inclusion. Lost. Separated from God.
You still sin, you are still under the law, you broke the law and you feel bad but you didn't feel bad while you were breaking it, did you? Why did you feel guilty afterwards? Are you not under grace and not the law? You don't believe that you will never, past and future, stop sinning until you get to heaven, because thats what Gods word tells you, why feel guilty if God tells you that? If that is Gods will for you? Are you not doing what God is telling you? Even though Jesus tells you to go and sin no more?
U can only learn the law and what it says as a child 🤣🤣 people think the law is the law of Moses
Unsubscribed…
We love you anyway.
Test
🤦🏽♂️ this guy is all over the place.
You are wrong about Jews being first into the body of Christ church. Israel has it's own separate church. The body of Christ does not begin until the conversion of Apostle Paul in Acts chapter 9.
2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. We are not born again, we are a totally new creation!
Amen