"I hit him." MA v. Karen Read - Commonwealth Closing Argument by Adam Lally
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 июн 2024
- "I hit him. I hit him. I hit him. I hit him." Assistant District Attorney #AdamLally delivers the Commonwealth's closing argument in the case against #KarenRead.
Read is accused of murdering her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, whose body was found in the snow outside of another Boston officer’s home in Canton, Massachusetts.
#CourtTV What do YOU think? #KillerOrCoverUpMurderTrial
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks: / @courttv
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
RUclips / courttv
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
#CourtTV What do YOU think? #VerdictWatch
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?
We've all told you.
Innocent
When is the next live stream?
Where's John O'Keefes hat he was wearing that night? Was it recovered? Wouldn't that mysterious 6ft tall man with dark hair, the defense claims was John, would have been wearing that hat?
This case needs to be tried again by a higher court.
My apologies for not reviewing tapes.
It still doesn't explain why John didn't enter the house with it on.
I am curious if it was saturated as in pooling blood or slattered?
I vote for a higher court to rule on this case.
So the McAlberts were allowed to sit there and stare down the jury. Yeah good one! 😏
I wonder why Higgins didn't show 🤔🤔. Hopefully he'll be in that courtroom next with his defense attorney
@@user-vd7mx8nw9r He was the only one of the people that was at the house that night that seemed like he felt bad. He got a little choked up when he was talking about meeting John's nephew on the stand.
@@goosejailvery good point. 👍
Of course they were. Jury intimidation should never been allowed. They were not friends of John. Lally no doubt got them there for a last ditch effort for effect. Turtle boy was booted because of the possible "Chilling effect" but the Albert goon squad is not equally chilling?
@@Physics072YES THEY WERE FRIENDS OF JOHN’S. Are u not paying attention?
Not ever referring to him as “Officer O Keefe” is so disrespectful
Yes, it makes the most sense that colleague police officers welcomed their friend, ambushed him, unleashed the rapid dog-attack, then dumped him on their front yard amidst a snowstorm, then framed Karen. That makes a lot of sense from a delusional alcoholic crazy woman's eyes and all whom believe her
Running over Officer O’Keefe, leaving him to die without calling 911, blaming his friends and harassing his family, is criminal, however.
@@marinkelmoon2866 honestly it’s refreshing to see people with actual common sense!!
I think people look at Karen Read and think an attractive well educated Rich woman could not commit this kind of crime, but women do it all the time!!
The fact that she admitted to it and the fact that she lied about it!!
Steadily praying for Justice for Officer John O’Keefe, and his family!
I completely agree!!… the fact that she sat there day after day, smirking and smiling and giggling right in front of his family is disgusting. It shows her true character. This is not a good woman. This is a narcissistic self-absorbed killer.!!
@@Liljodiso narcissistic and self absorbed that she constantly helped with his adopted children
People keep missing this main point that Jen McCabe’s husband texted in the group chat something to the effect of “the guy never came in the house” and Brian Albert replying “exactly”. Why text this if John never went inside? Why delete and upgrade your phones if you have nothing to hide? And why would anyone text this if he really wasn’t inside 34 Fairview?! *edited thanks to a wonderful reviewer who caught my mistake, thank you.
They said “the guy”
@@basicallyno1722 yes you’re right 🤦🏼♀️
That never happened!
@@Juke582 uhm, yeah it did. It was on Jackson's cross. Should pay attention better ☺️
@@Juke582 yes it did lol, you must not understand anything about any trials and have selective hearing.
Embarrassing and scary. I would pack my things up and leave that corrupt city asap
You can not explain why home owners especially trained police officers would not run out of house with all the police cars and ambulance to find out what the heck is going on, even if someone already told me there’s a police officer down on lawn. No way. Never happen unless your hiding or already know what happened to him. Disgusting
Hey, they did not want to be seen butt dialing in public maybe
They were asleep
@@bethpatriots7290 As if anyone would sleep soundly with a load of Police cars outside
@@huytontimestv There was a blizzard going on with high winds, and everything is muffled and there are rattling windows. It happened way over on the corner of their lot. It's not like there were constant sirens going off. The chatter would not have been heard. They were sound asleep
From what I can see and I’ve been following this for weeks. There is no evidence that she hit him with a car or anything else.
I beg to differ how do you explain her broken tail light? How do you explain pieces of those tail light being embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothing? How do you explain the SUVs computer telling on Karen exactly what happened in the early morning of January 29!!
How do you explain the cuts on his arm that were from her tail light and not from a dog bite because the DNA showed that there was no animal DNA in those cuts?? it seems to me that you have not been following along, there is more than enough evidence against Karen, there is no other plausible person who could’ve committed this crime. I hope for John O’Keefe and his family that she gets the sentence.!! she is guilty
@@Liljodiyou do realize that the experts hired by the FBI (and not the defense) stated that he was not hit by a vehicle, right?
@@Liljodi there was no bits of Tail light embedded in his clothing or arm . Have you seen anything of the trial or are you related to Proctor?
She said it.
@@Liljodi who had the clothing all that time ?is it not possible to hide any DNA that you just wash the sleeve? I’m going to ignore you from this point, and clearly there’s something wrong.😵💫
The prosecutors closing argument in my opinion absolutely DOES NOT prove murder. He should be embarrassed.
There’s just no way she would have left those voicemails if she knew she ran him over
10000% agree. thats a woman annoyed and mad with her boyfriend not a killer
Agreed!!! Thank you!!!! I said the same. Why would she make herself look bad??
You can't fake that kind of anger. Agreed.
Acting! Of course
@@Juke582 his kids were left alone. Was that a lie? Was that 'acting'? Lol, ok
Let me get this straight, because Karen did not take her shoes off when she entered into the house, it means she killed him? She knew she could wear shoes now because he would never know? How crazy. How about she is woman who is drunk and thinks her boyfriend is cheating on her and she just wants him to come home , so she doesn't care or even notice that her shoes are still on.
Consciousness of guilt. Karen Read also told John's niece at 5 am to call Mr. Camerano to come pick her up, because she knew that John was never coming home. And even at 5 am, Mr. Camerano, Kerry Roberts, and Jen McCabe all removed their shoes out of respect for John. Mr. Camerano also shovelled the snow that got in the garage because Karen Read left the door open so that John would not be upset when he got home. This was powerful evidence of consciousness of guilt of the only person who knew that John was never coming home again because she killed him.
Exactly! At a time like that who the hell cares about the damn floor??
@@roxanneagredano5430 Karen pretended like she didn't know he was dead. She knew he was never coming home and didn't bother to take off her boots, like she didn't bother to call 911 after she hit him. She just left him there to die in the snow. What a horrible woman she is.
If the shoes left grit, you must not acquit?
@@bethpatriots7290😂
Did this guy really just try to use shoes in a house as a way to show she knew she hit him? Wowzers.
That DOESNT NEGATE the fact that she killed him, you absolute ignoramus.
THE REAL ISSUE is that the truth isn't "exciting" to you like a meritless unfounded police cover up conspiracy theory with zero basis in any reality.
Not a SHRED of evidence to support it..
The truth isn't some dramatic flamboyant Hollywood soap opera lawyering just to keep you entertained
That is just one element out dozens more. If John were still alive she would have removed her boots like the other two ladies did.
@@barbaramay1866actually NOT removing her shoes is what makes sense. She was looking for him. The women suggested going back to the house she had just spent the night?! Both said she as hysterical, yet they waste time taking off their shoes?! No hurry to go look for him.
So the shoes actually shows me how shady and cold hearted McCabe is.
I just got to that part. I had to come back and find you comment. I have OCD (medically diagnosed not just saying it) and switch out my shoes between spaces I go to. When things are on my mind i sometimes forget. Who tf is shocked she had so much on her mind that she forgot?? That was such a weak argument I’m shocked he included it in his closing.
Well, I mean, he can't use the medical examiners testimony or his crash reconstruction experts testimony as evidence in his closing argument. Shoes and voicemails is all he's got to work with. 😂
Wow ! He said use your common sense. Where is his ? If they use theirs then obviously Not Guilty ! 🙃
Karen Read’s guilt is the only common sense decision. Her story is insane and did not happen. I hope the jury gets it right.
💯 🤣
Not guilty why, she admitted to a murder, her self she's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt I hope they see through all the lies in the web. She spun after what she did.
@@MarieAntoinette1938_tmc 🙄
Reads lying how No ONE notices..1st she dropped HIM off watch him get to door..then later she left him at the Waterfall. Come on folks. A man is dead his family now with another loss. The kids had John now he's gone as were their parents. Sad as hell.
Yes you are right she did say that
This actual closing statement is terrible. This guy should be fired along with Proctor
If I were Lally I would self exile out of embarrassment. This guy made an absolute joke out of himself. He’s truly a terrible attorney
Yes, it makes the most sense that colleague police officers welcomed their friend, ambushed him, unleashed the rapid dog-attack, then dumped him on their front yard amidst a snowstorm, then framed Karen. That makes a lot of sense from a delusional alcoholic crazy woman's eyes and all whom believe her
Not only bad but dishonest. Lied many times to witnesses to try to fool them on what they said.
Not a great prosecutor… His delivery was atrociously boring and unconvincing.
Boring is your opinion. Who cares if was or not? He went through many details that can’t be disputed no matter how much Jackson cries. Jackson talked about how everyone lied when they really did not. They really had nothing else. I hope the jury sees through all of his exaggerations and drama.
The truth is boring to some!
Lally did a great job
The evidence is against her...shes guilty n the prosecutors n police did an excellent job n thats a fact!
Sleazy and scandalous, disgustingly, awful, unethical Lally and Canton Police - What a horrible look for MASS...
The medical examiner unable to confirm manner of death with the defense witnesses are a not guilty for me despite her angry calls.
Someone trying to cover up a murder and make herself look innocent would not be screaming at him over voicemail. That's how you act when you're drunk and think your boyfriend is cheating on and ignoring you.
So many individual pieces fully exonerate her. Her wifi connection at 12:30. Witnesses noting the absence of his body outside at the time. His actual injuries. Every single expert testimony saying he literally couldn't have been killed by the car.
Not to mention the many obvious lies by investigators and deliberately misleading tactics by the prosecution. Not only is there reasonable doubt, but the defense did something that almost never happens, and doesn't need to- they PROVED her innocence.
I went from feeling sorry for this man for his sad incompetence to finding him just as reprehensible as the corrupt cops and seedy players in this unbelievable case. I hope they hire him to defend them in their federal trials! They ALL deserve one another
He showed a video of a parked white van in the snow with doors open and a distraught GF yelling as she sees her dying BF. Then the texts of a GF left alone with her BFs kids while her BF continues to party. All this lines up correctly. We all agree 👍. But how did they explain the wounds on JO and how,when and where did Karen do this? With her SUV she hit the back of his head multiple times but only struck his arm????? Who believes this?
Karen is guilty. That’s what I believe. Not a made up conspiracy. Jackson might as well of blamed bugs bunny.
I don’t believe anything the commonwealth had presented and I had no idea of anything in this case.
Crazy delusional people with no common sense.
@@stevenprice6957lol 😂. Jackson is the defence attorney. He is following the FACTS that are being brought forward by the experts. It’s up to Lally the prosecutor to prove who did it. Not the defence team. You are very confused on your logic of what Jackson’s and Lallys duties are. Please 🙏 explain to us how Lally proves that Karen killed JO.was it the voice mails or the texts that killed him?
Ikr where was he supposed to have been hit with the car??!
Absolute snooze fest of a closing
Totally
Snooze magooze 😴
The worst, he had nothing of substance to say and looked super bad after the stellar closing from the Defense.
Only a snooze fest to the mob that wants Karen to walk😮😮
@@lizdahl847
Nobody wants anything but to see which side proved the case. Maga is for corrupt police, regardless.
Lally just keeps repeating‘the broken tail light’. He did not connect the dots for the jurors.
The worst closing argument to date.
So true. I use to work in criminal law and he sounds like he just got out of law school. He’s an embarrassment to the State. 🤦♀️
Did you notice comments were turned off on defense counsel’s closing? They must have known it would be great hmmmm
@angeladavis1626 No, I didn't know that.
The closing argument is clutching at straws. Nothing makes sense, no real facts except timestamps that prove zero. The jury must be fed up by now...
What do you mean no real facts? Have you even watched this trial? I haven’t missed one minute.
How do you explain her tail light being broken? How do you explain her tail lights broken pieces inbedded in John O’Keefe’s clothing? How do you explain the cuts on his arm??.. because they debunked the fact that it was a dog because there was no animal or dog DNA in those cuts?? And how do you explain the fact that Karen lied consistently throughout this trial? You need to go back and rewatch, and then you will see that the fax point to Karen being the only plausible person who committed this crime.
Lally spoke about many, many FACTS that prove her guilt while Jackson basically said everyone is a liar.
You mean the straw that was found next to her victim’s body that was in the glass he walked away with from the bar that was shattered around him when he was struck by her SUV? That straw? Pretty good evidence if you ask me.
@@marinkelmoon2866 EXACTLY!! there was a lot more evidence than just that, the fact that the broken tail light matched hers from her broken tail light, the fact that pieces of the broken tail light was found embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothing the fact that she literally admitted it!! The fact that she said it was her fault!! They had been fighting 27 days prior because she thought he was cheating on her!!
The fact that she lied and said she left him at the waterfall restaurant and then she changed that story and said she watched him walk into the house at 34 Fairview and that was a lie !!
The fact that People actually Think that John was beaten in that house without him having defensive wounds is completely outrageous!! That man was 6’2” tall and well over 210 pounds!!
Her SUV is what brought on those injuries!! Steadily praying for Justice for John O’Keefe and his family. Good luck in prison, Karen.
Not guilty. Too much doubt and honestly I question those folks in the house too many questions no answers.
The only person who knows is Mr. O'Keefe. May he rest in peace.
They answered ALL the questions. John was never there. They all testified to that under oath, and their accounts of the events matched. P.S. The feds also said he wasn’t there and that there is nothing to indicate a coverup ever happened.
Jackson is a actor that why she got him she told yanetti she hit him
Liar
@@peggychamberlain9515no l am not a liar look it up how dear you call me a liar
@@peggychamberlain9515 who’s a liar?! Karen Read ?! Yup! And anyone saying she’s innocent is dumb. Trll me why KR first court appearance she pled “guilty but an accident “, in 2019 with Yanetti.
@jill2066. Officer John O'Keefe died in 2022. How did Karen Read tell Yanetti she did it in 2019?
Every time this man is about to tell a lie, he clears his throat
I feel like we should be throwing rotten tomatoes at this joker. He completely misinterpreted Jackson's words in closing. Jackson was telling the jury that the Commonwealth was hoping that everyone would just "look the other way" and just disregard the facts and evidence that proves that Karen DID NOT KILL JOHN.
The voicemails are irrelevant. She may have been mad at him for whatever reason because they're both human beings and are not perfect, but that doesn't make her a murderer.
Physical injuries do not add up to being hit by vehicle. I believe the FBI expert over the trooper. The FBI expert is more credible. Anything that is said by Proctor and his gang of his sick twisted troopers have absolutely no credibilty.
the voicemails are relevant because if she knew he was dead by her hand and would never listen to them, why on earth would she leave messages and call 53 times?
When she left in the am to find John both taillights still lit up red!! So that tail light was cracked but not missing those big pieces….YET
Thats what I said from the get go. The magic teleporting and time traveling taillight. It was towed at 5:30 so no way the taillight could get to canton to be found right? Wrong we changed the time from 4:10 to 5:30pm then edited the sally port film + reversed the video.
I'm so thankful to Lally for this closing statement. I've always had such a difficult time falling asleep at night, and thanks to Lally, I finally got a good nights sleep just by playing this video. I'm out like a light within 5 minutes!
Thanks Lally!
😂😂😂😂😂
This is the most boring closing argument I have ever seen! I'm going to sleep. Lally, go find another job.
It’s disorganized.
To his credit, he had nothing to work with 😂
So not GUILTY! Please FBI get justice for John and his family🙏🏼!! Find the real killers please!
Well they looked through it and found no conspiracy. That is why this is a trial.
Pathetic that the okeefes were lied to all this time by the mcalberts and le. How do they live with themselves?
Nice try.
She’s guilty.
@@thacryinggameCouldn’t type four words correctly in one try…your opinion isn’t surprising.
Also, the feds determined John was never in the house.
Lolly makes me sick that his closing statement is so squed and not any facts
What a schlub. Even though he wasn't hit by a car and her car didn't hit a person, he wants them to convict her because she's not a nice person or for her panicked raving. And the hair was frozen to the bumper? Then why didn't it fall off in the nice warm sally port of the Canton PD (where Higgins and Chief Berkowitz hung around)?
You'll never hear a good reason why two professional law enforcement officers (Albert and Higgins) destroyed their phones knowing there would be an investigation.
Karen parked in John's garage that night so how was it frozen to the back of the SUV? How would it have stuck to the SUV in the first place, their own lab tech said there was no blood or tissue on the vehicle.
SO much reasonable doubt. Not guilty.
is calling your parents three times during the night bc you're mad at your boyfriend reasonable or normal in your opinion?
@jenniferrodgers4172 anything is possible and it's not unreasonable at all no.
@@jenniferrodgers4172how do you know the relationship she had with her family. Drunk calls. Ever heard of them?
@@jenniferrodgers4172 she called them a lot so yes.
Why weren’t her parents to take the stand? Something to hide. Or why your sweet Kr take the stand? Guilty mind.
I cant wait to see the defence team for the Alberts and McCabes when they go under investigation after this case is complete with Karen Read going free with a NOT guilty. Wonder if proctor and trooper Paul will be their star witness for that trail. 😂😂😂😂. Good luck to them.
Only one killer. Her name is Karen. You may have heard of her. She’s a wrecking machine.
The feds said John was never in that house and that there was no coverup.
I thought their report was being held until the trial was over ? 🤔
And I can't wait when they go for Karen and her lawyers for accusing them of murder, with no proof at all.
Already investigated and nothing found at all! It was over 2 years ago! Duh 🙄
Four times?????? What a dope 🙄🙄🙄
Use your common sense? This coming from a prosecutor who isn't using his. Anyone who has watched this entire trial and has common sense clearly sees a plethora of reasonable doubt. The fact that this case moved forward should frighten everyone, you could be accused of a crime you did not commit. Maybe you feel she's not innocent, ok, but reasonable doubt exists therefore, not guilty. To those ready to convict her, i pray you are never on a jury or falsely accused.
Yes, it makes the most sense that colleague police officers welcomed their friend, ambushed him, unleashed the rapid dog-attack, then dumped him on their front yard amidst a snowstorm, then framed Karen. That makes a lot of sense from a delusional alcoholic crazy woman's eyes and all whom believe her
I watched every second of this trial, there may be reasonable doubt, BUT she confessed that she hit him right from the get go, I believed her. 💯guilty!
@@thomasogrodnik3233weirdo
I didn’t know that the My Cousin Vinny Confession could really stand up in court. “I shot the clerk?”
Not guilty, not guilty, not guilty, not guilty
Exactly! I love the 4 Times.
Listening to Lally is like reading "little red riding hood" to a non English speaking audience........waste of energy
Little red riding hood is about the bolt person Jackson hasn’t implied was in on the conspiracy. Maybe it was frosty the snowman hey
Seems super clear to me.
Take a brave man to repeat what Jennifer McCabe said lol
Thank you Lally! The jury must convict with this mountain of evidence!
Stop picking on Lally he did the best he could with a lost cause of a case. Should never have been brought to trial.
A long drawn out closing argument mumbled and boring as all hell.
Nothing new for Laly!!
make sure you don't take your car for a spin! LOLQ
This was sad at best. What a disgrace.
Look at the body language of the ppl in the background during this closing vs their body language during defense closing 😂😂😂
If ambulance and police our outside of my house at 6am with lights and commotion you bet I am running outside my house to find out what’s going on…. I’m definitely not choosing to sit in house while all that is going on…. Unless I’m guilty
i agree that’s weird
Nothing of what he says connstitutes evidence...its just words.
You dont convict a person base on messages and calls.
Embarrassing this even went to trial. This prosecutor literally put in closing arguments she kept her shoes on in the house as evidence of guilt. Epic fail.
He did a fantastic job! I hope the jury follows the evidence.
Alberts related to Proctor such an injustice! What a horrible case! Then nothing in the house gets investigated! Alberts and Higgs get rid of their phones, the dog disappeared..... the floor gets made over, the house gets sold..... my my my.
Oh and the tail light! Its only cracked until Proctor touches it! AND video is missing from salyport! Very shameful investigation. Just ask the FBI.
You clearly didn’t watch the trial because half of what you are saying is 100% incorrect . And dumb dumb, you act like the FBI is the most honest organization in the US. Guess what, it’s as crooked as many government agencies!
Hear say hear say hear say hear say
Both KR & JO and their entire crew are heavy drinkers. None of these people, including several of the LEO’s, have shown much emotional maturity. Evidence has been disposed of. Evidence has not been collected (inside 34 Fairview). This group of people have circled the wagons & left KR to wear the entire thing. NONE of the people are like able at all.
Text messages have been cherry-picked and shown without context. Vehicle evidence is weak. Autopsy is inconclusive. They clearly didn’t break up during the day since they went out that night. The ADA got a crappy case full of holes & he has no choice but to prosecute it. It’s his job & the higher-ups want this horrible episode closed. The defense attorney’s primary job is to test every piece of the prosecution’s case and expose its weaknesses. He illuminated enough reasonable doubt to drive a truck through.
Yeah, reasonable doubt is an understatement. They practically solved the case themselves.
This was by far the worst closing argument ive ever seen!!!!
Bias observation
@MarieAntoinette1938_tmc why is that?
@@Chicnoodle269I agree, it crumpled in the end and I felt so uncomfortable I think I actually clenched my desk. I went in unbiased, never heard of the case, came out thinking they hadn’t proven their case at all.
I don’t believe she said I hit him
So 4 people are mistaken. Amazing how she found the body buried in snow. She Said there’s John from the car. That’s when she quickly rang him then left her phone laying there and did a Betty Davis acting exhibition on front of her witnesses.
Ikr. Everyone is lying except Karen Read.
Because she didn’t. According to Jen’s first two testimonies Karen said “did I hit him.” According to Kerry, she said “did I hit him.” Jen’s statement changed. I
Also, as an EMT - I find it incredibly difficult to believe that two EMT’s taking patient and biographical history didn’t stop and ask “hit him with what and when” if they heard someone on scene say “I hit him.” If they didn’t, I’m pretty sure all EMT’s assumed with a fist or blunt hand tool…because that’s what the injuries are consistent with
That was just lies from Jenn!!!
@@basicallyno1722 And her first communication with Kerry "John's dead." The end. In the next communication she backtracked a little. This is before she fake found him buried in the snow. No one is lying under oath! All the witnesses want is justice for their friend.!
"I bit him. I bit him. I bit him" Chloe
…too soon.
A man is dead and two children who lost their parents and their uncle are without parents and now a guardian.
(but that was funny)
I did not hit her
I did not hit her
The disaster artist
Lally robotically repeats himself, and blatantly asks jurors to disregard components of evidence presented, including omitting the fact of failure to secure crime scene, which taints entire investigation. Even the claims of her saying "oh my God I hit him' versus 'did I hit him?', such statements do not indicate any intention to kill him. Even dooosch-bagg proctor very clearly states he doesn't think he can prove intentional versus accidental impact, even if you believe her car did hit him. No basis to charge murder from any of that evidence. Him suggesting that how she showed grief is evidence of guilt "why did she act like that?" - throw Lally's comments down the crapper.
He sounds like he's reciting from a court report, no suggestion that he strongly believes what he's saying.
It's almost irrelevant if her car hit him; the evidence is suspect, there is exculpatory evidence to rebut, and mountain of reasonable doubt. Best Lally can hope for is a recalcitrant juror (maybe even a local with a vested interest) forcing a mistrial.
Kudos to an amazing defense team! That closing argument was epic! This momo ….what an embarrassment! Shoo
Not guilty. It was obviously that other guy that wanted to fight him.
she may have hit by accident and panicked..
but the prosecution has not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Doesn’t matter, she said she hit him to so many people, she even told her dad she hit something, but wasn’t sure what. Who does that ?? She’s a very convincing liar, insanely jealous, mostly manufactured in her sick mind. She didn’t call 911 because she was drunk and she had hit John. WTF
I hope she lives a fine life, she has to live with this for the rest of her life.
If that's the case, how do you explain all the inconsistency from the defense witnesses?
Reasonable Doubt. Not Guilty.
I can't believe he opened closing arguments with here say
Lally is a complete scumbag!!!
I’m sorry lunchbox, i think your just making excuses for a bunch of iffy humans.
Lunchbox?😅 that's my 1st hearing someone referred to a goofy person. Idk how Lunchbox gets put into a adjective describing a person.... but.... it's funny. 😂
That is NOT what happened!
"If the shoes were on, she killed John" - Adam lally
Guilty obviously,,, but she'll walk,,, just like OJ did. Her celebrity like status and good looks will definately not hinder verdict.
She has below average looks but a lot of people are on the fence on the verdict.
When i see the people who believe she is guilty i am worried tor humanity. Genuinely.
And I sincerely hope they are never accused of something they are not guilty of and have to face a jury who does not follow evidence to free them. This could happen to any one of us and it's disturbing.
Well, hope they never hit your jury. I think the jury here will be ok, I hope.
@@angelasome9044There are multiple lawyers and engineers on the jury. The obvious science and investigatory misconduct will not be ignored. The best possible thing the prosecution could hope for is a hung jury/mistrial so they can continue to try to assassinate her character some more.
It's never required that a defense proves the defendant's innocence. And it very rarely will happen for a number of reasons. However, they did this time.
They're probably crooked cops too lol
Just wanted to see if anyone else looks at her face and sees that smug look and just can’t stand her by looking at her or is it just me
It's you for judging a person that was framed and the guilty mcalberts trying to cover it all all because they have LE ties.
Charlieking...do you know she has MS and sometimes can't control movements or facial expressions sometimes. Especially when tired or under stress. Which she definitely tired and stressed. I know because I have a sister in law with MS 😢
What do you say to the fbi witnesses who did all the mathematics, physics tests, and biomechanic reemactments to exact items and temperatures? Common sense
@@candaceflores1528 But she can drink like a sailor and drive around like nothing and kill?
Yes, I find myself disliking KR all along. Regarding her facial movements, she has no problem laughing and smiling outside when walking with her lawyers. I agree. It’s been 2 years and you can see the grief all over Patrick’s face, but Karen always had that chin sticking out in defiance. I still think she caused his death. She blacked out and admitted it when she left out the whole stop at the Albert’s. At 5am she’s calling people saying he’s dead and got hit by a plow. She instantly finds him buried in the snow. She is guilty of manslaughter and leaving him
Must be painful to be the commonwealth right now.
What a joke
Do you
People really believe that EVERYONE at that party clammed up to aid in covering up a murder of a fellow officer An officer who everyone knew was raising his deceased sibling’s kids? Do
You believe the wives and others at this party were all complicit and that everyone has kept their mouths shut for the duration of the investigation and even years since? Impossible This defense was brilliant in raising reasonable doubt but the reality is yeah, she hit him - and no, not every emt who says she said that is lying again, that’s just not a reasonable thing to believe
A cop with 28 years plus on the job has a man killed in his house and puts him out on his front lawn. I am frightened by the thinking of conspiracy theorists
I mean…cops have been found to do things far more dumb. See this case for more examples.
The bright red intact taillight in the Ring video and physics. It's amazing the leap people will make in order to disregard reality.
What do you say to the fbi witnesses who did all the mathematics, physics tests, and biomechanic reemactments to exact items and temperatures? Common sense
@@Really........It sure is! What does physics have to do with putting the man you murdered out front.
You are absolutely right. Drunk driving fatalities happen all the time. I have never heard of a 20-person conspiracy to frame innocent person for murder.
He followed Alan Jackson's masterpiece of a closing with this? How embarrassing.
She kept saying ..did I hit him I hit him why didn't she say we're is John .. then she saids after she is ok ..I do not remember what happened .unreal
Factually innocent.
This prosecutor is horrible and should be as embarrassed as the police dept in Canton
'i hit him i hit him i hit him' she never said...he never said...witnesses never said 'by a car'. Lally wants you to believe it's a car
None of what Lally included in his closing arguments explains those dog attack bites n scratches on John's arm..nor the utter lack of any bodily injuries below his neck
Why would he even mention those awful texts and messages from Proctor? Just highlighted it for the jusy.
Is he all over the place? His narrative has no order how does he expect the jury to make sense of what he's saying?
Even if she had hit him... how could this ever have been lethal, if there were no broken bones and no bruises? This question Lally does not want to answer "for some reason". I hope he will get some karma for his "performance"
Why would she call him 53 times after murdering him accusing him of sleeping with another girl, or lying trying to bait him saying she left the children there alone and went back home? also, explain the fact that the triple expert doctor said there would 100 percent for sure be bruising after getting hit with an SUV. FOR SURE. explain that people who think shes guilty??
Yanetti knows she done this theatrical Jackson she pleaded guilty before
I love how Lally just rolls off the names of all the killers that were involved in the murder and cover up, just in case we should forget. 52:05 and 52:38
Ny don’t need any of those Massachusetts state troopers here!
The flipped photo of the car tail light and the Vulgar words towards Karen are what turned the tables for me.
How come Court TV doesn't have a timer up fora verdict watch like they normally do?
I think they knew it would not be done today. Even if they have a good answer they still kind of have to go through all the evidence one at a time and there was a lot
GUILTY
Lally recited a snooze fest. He wouldn't know how to close a door much less a court case!
Ask yourself why the CW spent over 100k to frame Kearney and have yet to look for the Ford Edge seen by the body location hours before it was found. Is anyone curious to why that car was blocking the body at 3 am?
46:28 Which frame is this from the original video, show the entire video, not just one cherrypicked frame that makes your argument look like an absolute. 🤡 Lally
“Mister Lally, such a continuous personal vendetta is hardly conducive to the dignity of your position as District Attorney. The commonwealth and its witnesses have made totally unsupported accusations against my name and John’s. If any of you have one authentic shred of evidence, just one, let them bring it forth! Otherwise, if one more word of this outrageous calumny reaches my ears, I shall sue! I shall take the commonwealth to the supreme court and I shall sue the Boston, Canton, and Massachusetts State Police! I will not stand quietly by and allow myself to be crucified by a deranged mob of sycophantic morons whose fetid frustration has overcome their judgment! If scandal is to your taste, Mr Lally, I shall give you a feast!“
Karen Reed ~
The Prime of Miss Karen Read
Hes a disgrace. And should be ashamed of himself.
How can Lally feel good about himself!!
Firefighter McLaughlin is friends with Kaitlin Albert though, and even lied about being friends with her, so her testimony holds no weight
Guilty, wish they had more than 1 hr, Lally had a lot more to say
Lots of womp womp womp wompa
After listening to him ramble with confusing questions for 30 days, 1 hour felt like more than enough to me. 😅
Well you're real dumb huh
Well the defence managed to say it all in an hour.
@@SunnyDays70s all they had to cover was their bs made up story. Lally, however boring and non-Hollywood actor lk the atrocious Jackson is, but he had a ton more evidence to cover.
Its all not relevant.there is no enough evidence to convict.
With all the shenanigans that went on from the CW side, there is so much beyond reasonable doubt, it has to be not guilty. That doesn't mean she is innocent.
Lally - no ones listening