It does, and it should. He knew what he was risking when he took us into Iraq. He fully understood it would define his legacy. It is a shame, because without Iraq he could have been a helpful voice in politics, a wise older statesman.
Up until Iraq he had got it right on foreign policy. Even though Afghanistan failed long term. After 9/11 direct intervention was always going to occur. Unfortunately Iraq shits over everything.
Well said. Blair seemed to believe that he was divinely ordained to spread his particular version of liberal democracy (a neo-imperalist notion). New Labour had several policy successes, but not in Iraq.
Attlee 100% how he never got the full 15 years in charge just proves he was such a danger to the establishment. All the newspapers were against him. Even after creating the NHS creating social housing amongst other great policies which helped the great british public enormously. He increased the standard of living. That's what you should strive and be recognised for
I agree on his place, however he was no massive threat to the establishment, a key member of the wartime coalition, Deputy Prime Minister who had to cover during Churchill on trips aboard, or more quietly during his illnesses. He since also after the US breaking of wartime agreements, authorized the development of a UK atomic bomb and led also via his Foreign Secretary, led the effort to persuade the US to do something new in their history, agree to a binding security treaty - NATO. Dimwits like Corbyn think it was forced by the US. Domestically the post war consensus they established lasted for over 30 years, which does not looks like a huge threat. What undermined it was the effect of economic events, starting with the US withdrawal from Bretton Woods, then worse the 1973 oil crisis. There were many in business and some in the Conservative Party who had never reconciled with the post war settlement, now they had their chance. Though the rise in strikes and militancy were seen as the drivers for this, or the public face, I wonder if another thing was also a factor, in 1976 social mobility peaked in the UK.
You should do a special episode where you compare and contrast your own complete rankings of the best and worst prime ministers. I'd happily sit and watch for hours.
Theresa May is the worst PM since Lord North. As well as making a hash of the Brexit negotiations, she wrote net zero into law, enshrined the Modern Slavery Act (making it impossible to deport many illegal immigrants) and committed the UK to spending a fixed amount of GDP on international aid. I tried to think of a single positive thing she achieved in her premiership. All I can think of is her giving Geoffrey Boycott a knighthood.
Windrush wasn't even the worst of her failures. Single-handedly she destroyed British policing, by politicising the oversight, introducing direct entry as a tool to quickly assimilate operational control, and directly interfering in operational matters. The corporate memory has been eviscerated as a direct consequence of her ill informed actions. The blame for the current abject levels of service delivery are directly attributable to her.
Not to mention the decade of austerity headed by her party. Forces are under funded, under equipped, and understaffed. It pains me that this is often overlooked in debate over her record in office.
@@DarkFire515 took the words out my mouth, it was a blatant political point scoring exercise against policing which damages the institution regardless of party. If you want policing reform that is the governments place but if the police have to be focused on how senior ministers or the prime minister are going to politicise their actions they will always fail to deliver adequate service. A massive stain on her record.
Let’s not forget Macmillan inherited prosperity and left the country in decay. I had to laugh at the list of technology that were commonplace in 1964, but weren’t in 1951. If that’s the standard, the internet, widescreen TVs and iPhones weren’t commonplace in 1997, but were in 2007. So kudos to Blair on those, I guess.
McMillan has a lot of back story in regard to the old poor law around the time of the First World War. Churchill and McMillan were really old buffers at the end of the 1950s.
I think when judging May’s legacy, you have to remember that she passed up the opportunity to fire Boris for hurting the UK abroad with that poem. She could have sacked him for a definite bad thing, clear and explainable, which had hurt the UK abroad. You have to consider that everything Boris did, she caused, and everyone with any sense would have seen the possibility he might cause that sort of problems if allowed to continue.
You two are a total joy to watch you have differing views but are always respectful. Yeah I can tell Rory is very much on the left wing of the conservative voter so maybe the political void between you both isn’t as large as it can be in general politics but I enjoy watching each and every video you release. I’d have loved to see you on your tour but at £75 a ticket it was a little pricey for me. Keep up the good work.
I have to agree with them over Johnson (disastrously incompetent) and Truss (dangerously incompetent) as the worst two PMs. I think Truss could have won hands down had she been allowed any more time. However, it amazes me that both still have their passionate advocates.
Disagreeing is not to shout at eachother. Disagreeing is listening and maybe come away with some understanding. The overalt process and outcome is better for that discussion. That is why polarisation is so damaging. Keep up the good work.
You have to call out the fash, my grandad fought for 6 years, was staunch for Churchill and now they cuddled up to the extremists for short term advantage with the results that are plain to see.
She did say one thing that i agree with in 2004 at the conservative party conference she called the conservative party the Nasty Party nothing has changed except for Rory and a few others in conservative party.. Her miss judgment was appointment of BJ as foreign secretary and Frost...
Rory isn’t affected by any of the government’s policies, he’s sorted financially so he’s free to judge people like May based on his friendship with her
Clement Attlee Was An Amazing Prime Minister Who Helped The British Economy And Britain Recover After WW2. He Passed The National Health Service And Supported The Working Class Of Britain. He Also Began Decolonisation And Decolonized India Pakistan And Burma. (Bangladesh Was East Pakistan At The Time) His Worst Mistake Was The 1951 General Election Which Allowed Churchill To Return To Office. Also Palestine.
There's one huge irony about the criticism of Theresa May's handling of Brexit - Had Alistair & comrades within Labour and the people's vote accepted the result, but campaigned for a softer Brexit; then we'd probably never have ended up with Boris, and a far closer relationship with the EU. Likewise, if they'd campaigned more publicly the result might have been different - something he appeared to concede in interviews UKICE: You had a role advising the Britain Stronger In Europe campaign. What was your role? AC: To be absolutely honest, I feel a little bit guilty about this, because I did not do that much. I think, like a lot of people, I felt it was not going to be lost. So, I went into their campaign HQ a few times, but I was not involved day to day. I thought Alan Johnson, who I really like and who I really get on with, suffered the whole time with what (Jeremy) Corbyn and acolytes were up to. Alan was leading the Labour side of the campaign, but without really having the backing of the actual Labour leadership. Because you did not have Labour organising campaigning from the top and because Corbyn was so indifferent to the whole thing, that also sent a message to a lot of the trade unions, who I think could have done a lot more. They could have been much more active in terms of getting direct messaging to their members, and spelling out the true cost of what was going to happen. ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness-archive/alastair-campbell/
Asked who was the best Labour Prime Minister the UK never got, Atlee said MacMillan. During the 1930s MacMillan was in conversation with Labour about crossing the floor.
The reason you guys agree on a whole lot of things (but not everything), is that you are both sensible, respectful, and know what you are talking about!
Most countries in Europe do have NI, the difference is that its ringfenced and you get a statement of exactly what percentage is for healthcare, pension fund, unemployment benefits etc.
- Best PM? Tony's not far behind Attlee, I mean Northern Ireland alone... - Iraq war.... - I get that but still... - Afghanistan, Privatization of NHS, Thatcher-lite - Okay, that's enough. - ASBOs, Chilcot, Racist remarks, financial crisis. - I worked for him, Okay? What am I supposed to say, Rory?!!
The Road Fund Licence (Car Tax) was introduced decades ago when motorised transport expanded, in order to raise money for the needed road upgrades, bridges and motorways, but it has since become a way for a government just to raise money by another form of tax.. I remember when John Major was Chancellor, he stated that money raised by the Car Tax isn't necessarily spent just on road infrastructure (if at all) - the Car Tax is just put into the pot with all the other taxes raised - Income Tax, VAT, Excise Duty, Corporation Tax, etc, etc..... and spent how the government of the day wants...
Keir Starmer might arguably be the most effective LOTO since the war. Most by-election wins, shifting government policy, now on course for a supermajority.
In my lifetime I’d say John Smith. Can’t go Starmer, he doesn’t have anything like the natural groundswell of support that either Smith or Blair had - he has done an exceptional job of allowing the Tory party to stab themselves in the back though - but the performance remains far more about disgust with the Tory party than support for Labour in my opinion.
Dignity is no good if you are useless. To my mind she was rigid minded and stuck to poor judgements in spite of plenty of evidence proving her judgements were poor. She refused to listen and refused to take notice of evidence of what was happening on the ground and where her policies were not working or making things worse and that was before she was PM (as Secretary of State) as well as after.
It's difficult as i know Rory has great admiration for May, but we have to remember this was the lady that hated immigrants. As home secretary, she used to write in the margins of bills that they were too soft on migrants and the wording should be beefed up to make life worse for them. The vans that circled parts of the country telling migrants to go home, that was her. I remember when Ann Soubry defected to change, she said that Theresa May's extreme hatred of immigrants has scared her away. Ann mentioned that she had gone to speak to the PM and she was in the middle of a Xenophobic rant, a day before she defected.. I know we have had worse since then, but she really wasn't great. If she truelly regrets what she did, thats awesome, we don't need another doubling down Liz truss.
Regarding Mrs May and her getting hard on immigrants…. For my sins I was in a Home Office meeting when we were told to use any means to stop issuing Passports to first time applicants on her orders. I had to stand up and tell the person delivering these orders that we were public civil servants, that we worked according to law, not to any Ministers political whim and the request to break that was disgraceful and illegal and I, for one, would have no part in it and neither should anyone else…. very abruptly the meeting ended and I was warmly congratulated on my way out of the room. Never the less I lived in fear of getting punished afterwards! Fortunately nothing came of it; but I can’t regard anything you might say warmly of her bearing in mind my experience.
Rory seems to want attribute the achievements of McMillan as being from 1951 to 1963 which is a stretch. McMillan was not PM until '57, that very successful house building programme had been the creation of Attlee's tenure, and, oops, oh yes, in the meantime, we had the shocking Eden era.
IMO Theresa May prioritized her party over the wellbeing of the nation as a whole. She seemed ONLY to care about preventing the Tory Party from splitting into 2 or more factions. She REFUSED to co-operate with opposition parties over brexit and instead facilitated the hard right within her own party to go for a hard Brexit. She seemed MORE than happy for the UK to leave not only the EU but the Single Market and the Customs' Union as well. Moreover, she PROTECTED those responsible for the Grenfell Tower disaster. I am honestly BAFFLED by Rory's defence of her clearly piss-poor record.
Murderers often regret their actions, doesn't wipe away their actions. Windrush victims with cancer having treatment refused and made homeless... There are hundreds of MPs with dignity who have not/would not bring in horrendous policies.
I think the reason may is seen as a reasonable person is partly because she has done some good work since being PM from the back benches , but also because compared to her three successors she stands head and shoulders above them for being statesman like and that may be due to them being appallingly terrible . Regarding Brexit I think she took the view that the electorate had decided and she had to honour that decision and perhaps she also did a 'Cameron ' by trying to put the divisions on Europe in the Tory Party to bed and ultimately making them much worse and allowing the pro Brexit hardliners to grow in strength .
It's what you do in government and not on the back bench that shows true character. I am continually disappointed by how 'shocked' you Westminster bubble folk are at how angry we, the voters actually are about how this country has been governed over the past 14 PLUS years! Look at yourselves and learn from YOUR OWN MISTAKES, PLEASE!!!
@@schusterlehrling lol that's true! I had expected some justification for Harold being under-rated though. I seriously doubt involvement in Vietnam was ever on the cards as the French were already defeated and the Suez debacle made foreign adventures unappealing.
Corelli Barnett's book "The Lost Victory" documents the economic disasters of Attlee's government. The country went bankrupt in 1947 and all that nationalization sent the country on the wrong path. Attlee was almost a communist. Both parties were in favour of creating the NHS in 1945. Picking MacMillan illustrates that Rory was always in the wrong party. MacMillan was a Butskellite/social democrat and it was about managed decline. MacMillan met Eisenhower before Suez and didn't tell him what was being planned, Eden thought he had. MacMillan was ruthless and sneaky.
IN regards to splitting out NI from Income Tax, Rory said very few places do that. I'd argue that Australia do it through the Medicare Levy. I think more transparency about it'#s use and putting it where it belongs would be better. I have no issue with paying NI if it is going towards Penions and the NHS. If it is just going to the general pool then that is misappropriation of funds and a far bigger issue.
I admire Rory, but his glib and easy acceptance and trivialising of the hostile environment and Windrush is really unsettling. Shows that deep he is very privileged and doesn't really get how it feels to be on the wrong end of policies like those.
It is the problem of being mates with them all. I take notice now every time Rory's decisions about someone are prefaced by either some story together or how they were friends. Alistair is very party political but Rory is the classic rich mates club type.
In my view populism is the political position that the People are uncorrupted (at an extreme, "pure") and have a single interest and a single will, and that the will of the People is being frustrated by a corrupt elite that pursues the interest of a foreign, alien, and/or self-serving minority. It denies not only that the people have different views, but also that they have interests that are to any extent rival. It denies all compromise, and also denies that there is any complexity of policy that is not apparent to the Will of the People.
Germany is an interesting comparison when it comes to Whips. German MPs have their right to use their vote according to their own judgement written into the constitution; which provides a nice counterbalance to the power of the whips.
Poor Rory! 😂 Speaking as someone who likes a hypothetical, I can appreciate that asking whether Rory would have done the honourable thing if he'd been in a situation brought about by an act that would have been, he says, too dishonourable to have been taken in the first place IS sort of unanswerable in any useful way. That is, I suspect that Rory means that a Rory who'd got into that position would be a different person from the one trying to respond to the question on his own behalf. Obviously, he could still have done more to opine on what the right thing to do would have been for a person generally. He could also have reflected on when he feels it's right for someone to resign, etc.. On the topic itself, more generally, I wonder if there's a strong enough convention that the department pays for its political head's balls-ups that any fine would be chosen with that in mind. The publicity around her statement was compounded by the department being fined, increasing the political damage to the individual and the regime backing them. That IS a kind of punishment. I'll let others debate whether the magnitude was sufficient. I suppose that making somebody more politically toxic than before can even have direct consequences of greater magnitude insofar as they're made less likely to get roles in government, aside from being an MP.
I disagree that the principled position on NI is merge rather than abolish. I think the principled position is to ring fence it again, and do the same with Road Tax. I'd MUCH rather pay directly for the things everyone *needs* and know that those things will be provided, than have it all hidden in general taxation and politicians be able to spaff it all up the wall on their mates. Granularity is transparency - and *that* is why I think the conservatives favour getting rid of it. And perhaps that's an unfair characterisation of the conservative party - but after the last 10 years especially I'd kind of like to hear how.
Absolutely, I also believe we should have a system they have in Australia here, in which they send a letter every year to everyone showing how much tax they paid and they break down where their money was spent.
Ring fencing doesn't work. If you have a surplus you can't use it. If you have too little you can't get the money from elsewhere. That has always been the problem. Government revenues are NEVER predictable, nor are the precise amounts that will be needed for services like health.
Alistair's comparison btw the stage of public debate on colonial legacy in UK and FR is off - Public debate is raging rn in Fr, sure, but that's because it's only just been initiated. UK is couple stages down the line. I know the landscape well as lived lifelong in both.
My impression of May and Brexit is that at every crunch point she put Party before Country and refused to take on the hard line Brexiteers because it would split the party
NI does act as a qualifying contribution for certain benefits and you can pay voluntary NI contributions (in certain appropriate circumstances) to protect your state pension entitlement, but you can't pay voluntary tax and you may not be working and paying tax when you pay voluntary NI contributions to protect your state pension entitlement. I don't see how that would work if income tax is the only one that qualifies people for pensions.
I am a big fan of Rory.i have been a labour voter all my life. But would have voted for Rory if he had lead the Tories. Me and my wife run a foodbank which is basically an attempt to realise something of the Big Society. Please come back to me if you are interested. We have handed out about £20millin of food and baby supplies. And nearly all our funding is self generated.
@pmmagro I find your description to be like the classic historiography that every Swede can recite by heart, but in my opinion is quite different. I agree with you to the extent that as you write "in reality behind closed doors" but choose to go considerably further and that everyone in decision-making positions knew about it because it happened in practice completely openly and because the Americans acted without any restrictions, which indicated that the officers in the military leadership wanted to be caught in order to then force the politicians on a decision to join NATO already then, which the ruling party Social Democrats understood and as a result constantly ran between the Prime Minister's Office and the Embassy of the Soviet Union to dampen the reactions and blame the right-wing parties for infiltration among the officers without showing a response for the public. This created anger among those in power in Finland at the time who felt that they exposed the immediate area to unnecessary risks, which is glaring today when the two defense commands are very close to each other thanks to the former Minister of Defense Peter Hultqvist as one of the 70,000 Finnish war children who fled to Sweden for protection during the Winter War.
People died, human beings were treated worse than animals, her hostile environment was deliberately designed to traumatise a specific group of people because she's evil. She is devoid of any shred of moral fibre.
Sweden has been neutral since 1814. So 1814-2024. We have always been anti-Russian through. When Putin tried to forbid Sweden and Finland who we can co-operate with with a taint of "or else" it was a given we had to do something. Finland is very key to Swedes. We do have a special bond to all Scandinavian countries but Sweden-Finland are the two twin siblings or closest siblings in age of the family for Swedes (Etsonia being the newest/youngest sibling with Latvia next). As we have always been anti Russian and co-operated militarily with the US after WW2 (in reality behind closed doors) it is now a more honest position.
I find your description to be like the classic historiography that every Swede can recite by heart, but in my opinion is quite different. I agree with you to the extent that as you write "in reality behind closed doors" but choose to go considerably further and that everyone in decision-making positions knew about it because it happened in practice completely openly and because the Americans acted without any restrictions, which indicated that the officers in the military leadership wanted to be caught in order to then force the politicians on a decision to join NATO already then, which the ruling party Social Democrats understood and as a result constantly ran between the Prime Minister's Office and the Embassy of the Soviet Union to dampen the reactions and blame the right-wing parties for infiltration among the officers without showing a response for the public. This created anger among those in power in Finland at the time who felt that they exposed the immediate area to unnecessary risks, which is glaring today when the two defense commands are very close to each other thanks to the former Minister of Defense Peter Hultqvist as one of the 70,000 Finnish war children who fled to Sweden for protection during the Winter War.
Keep disagreeing respectfully please, most of my news comes from the left, A Different Bias, Truth to Power and such and I do need balance but Rory is the only Tory I will listen to, admittedly before this particular crop there were decent people amongst the Tories and on the Government benches, Rudd for instance but this lot just make me angry so keep going as you are.
Not sure why “she regrets doing that” is an argument in defence of May on the Go Home vans. It’s not like hindsight is required to understand how horrific that was. Equally, I find it extraordinary to hear people trying pretend May made real efforts towards a soft Brexit. Her choice of personnel in the key positions and her actions, from “Brexit means Brexit” to the insane triggering of Article 50 before any plan was in place forced us down the hard Brexit route. Similarly, Windrush wasn’t forced on her, it was a deliberate choice and the appalling consequences were entirely foreseeable. I’ve only ever once been convinced by May expressing sadness, and that was when she cried at being kicked out. I’ve never seen any evidence that she can feel or show compassion for others.
"As a 'Citizen of Nowhere,' her words not mine, Theresa May couldn't hold a candle to Clement Atlee. She was the Prime Minister of Nothing. Harsh? Well, not as harsh as being a Windrush victim or being an immigrant and seeing those vans driving around, something Lee Anderson would be proud of. But the blame for the hard Brexit does equally lie with people like Corbyn and Starmer for not seeing what failure to help her would bring down on the country.
I fully agree with Rory. Whatever happened she was someone with integrity who was caught in a very difficult context. After all, like other human beings we are not infallibile. But she tried unlike the clown(s) who followed.
Clement Attlee was not the best PM because even without Attlee much of what Labour did would have happened anyway. I would say Thatcher was clearly the best PM (whatever you think of her policies) because she absolutely dominated as PM and won three elections, and changed a whole bunch of things often through the force of her personality. Not to say everything was down to Maggie but she certainly had a big impact. Attlee was a good chairman of the board but I don't think he was a leader like Thatcher. Best govt and best PM are not the same!
boris johnson as one of the worst is total recency bias, although i agree for liz truss, the other one would probably be callaghan or blair for easily the worst foreign policy in british history
Sunak has attempted to do populism, when he gave that conference on the Rwanda bill and said the lords would be blocking “the will of the people”, a PM with no mandate and their 2019 manifesto made no mention of Rwanda, it was a pathetic attempt at being a populist.
But I am a citizen of nowhere, I belong to nowhere except with the people I love and those people live on Sesame Street. Do you know what it is like to be from nowhere?
I visited West Germany aged 18 with my £50 maximum of foreign currencythe week that MacMillan announced 'you've never had it so good'. When I saw the prosperity and lifestyle I realised what a lier!
Torsten Bell is considering standing for the Labour Party? Don't know how I feel about that news. I have similar feelings to the guys (particularly Alastair, for once) that although Think Tanks are often deeply ideological, divisive things, there are a handful around at the moment who are doing a good job of building real space in a new middle ground where the parties are otherwise scrambling.They manage to somehow come off as less narrowly ideological and more pragmatic, though in truth I suspect that's a trick of the light, and there's a strong argument that they actually represent the likely outline of the new post neo-liberal settlement. I've found that tapping into the likes of the IFS and Resolution Foundation feels a better way to get a handle on the future of our politics than following the daily Tory / Labour dramas.
TM lied to my MP about having further opportunities to vote down brexit proposals in order to get her to support on bills for brexit. "Meaningful votes" and all that. An important, but not yet learned, lesson for MPs of all flavours not to grant PM access to the accelerator and steering unless you've got guaranteed control of the brakes.
It annoys me when people cannot see the difference between having a reasonable debate, conversation verses seeking an argument who would want that!! Great podcast both get views across clear do not agree on everything and as adults able to say that 🙄
Blair might have been the most successful Labour PM, but unfortunately the war in Iraq overshadows everything he did.
It does, and it should. He knew what he was risking when he took us into Iraq. He fully understood it would define his legacy. It is a shame, because without Iraq he could have been a helpful voice in politics, a wise older statesman.
And he bottled out of tackling the issue of Social Care when he messed about with the NHS.
Yes, like all politicians show themselves to be sooner or later, Blair is a sociopath with an on-the-spectrum-level lack of self awareness.
Up until Iraq he had got it right on foreign policy. Even though Afghanistan failed long term. After 9/11 direct intervention was always going to occur. Unfortunately Iraq shits over everything.
Well said. Blair seemed to believe that he was divinely ordained to spread his particular version of liberal democracy (a neo-imperalist notion). New Labour had several policy successes, but not in Iraq.
Attlee 100% how he never got the full 15 years in charge just proves he was such a danger to the establishment. All the newspapers were against him. Even after creating the NHS creating social housing amongst other great policies which helped the great british public enormously. He increased the standard of living. That's what you should strive and be recognised for
I agree on his place, however he was no massive threat to the establishment, a key member of the wartime coalition, Deputy Prime Minister who had to cover during Churchill on trips aboard, or more quietly during his illnesses.
He since also after the US breaking of wartime agreements, authorized the development of a UK atomic bomb and led also via his Foreign Secretary, led the effort to persuade the US to do something new in their history, agree to a binding security treaty - NATO. Dimwits like Corbyn think it was forced by the US.
Domestically the post war consensus they established lasted for over 30 years, which does not looks like a huge threat.
What undermined it was the effect of economic events, starting with the US withdrawal from Bretton Woods, then worse the 1973 oil crisis.
There were many in business and some in the Conservative Party who had never reconciled with the post war settlement, now they had their chance.
Though the rise in strikes and militancy were seen as the drivers for this, or the public face, I wonder if another thing was also a factor, in 1976 social mobility peaked in the UK.
You should do a special episode where you compare and contrast your own complete rankings of the best and worst prime ministers. I'd happily sit and watch for hours.
As a Swede, I'm impressed with Rory's knowledge of history :-)
Personally, I can't forgive May for the hostile environment and the impact that had on my life.
Theresa May is the worst PM since Lord North.
As well as making a hash of the Brexit negotiations, she wrote net zero into law, enshrined the Modern Slavery Act (making it impossible to deport many illegal immigrants) and committed the UK to spending a fixed amount of GDP on international aid.
I tried to think of a single positive thing she achieved in her premiership. All I can think of is her giving Geoffrey Boycott a knighthood.
Windrush wasn't even the worst of her failures. Single-handedly she destroyed British policing, by politicising the oversight, introducing direct entry as a tool to quickly assimilate operational control, and directly interfering in operational matters. The corporate memory has been eviscerated as a direct consequence of her ill informed actions. The blame for the current abject levels of service delivery are directly attributable to her.
Agreed. I cannot forgive her for the 'stop crying wolf' speech and all that flowed from that.
Not to mention the decade of austerity headed by her party. Forces are under funded, under equipped, and understaffed. It pains me that this is often overlooked in debate over her record in office.
@@DarkFire515 took the words out my mouth, it was a blatant political point scoring exercise against policing which damages the institution regardless of party. If you want policing reform that is the governments place but if the police have to be focused on how senior ministers or the prime minister are going to politicise their actions they will always fail to deliver adequate service. A massive stain on her record.
Let’s not forget Macmillan inherited prosperity and left the country in decay. I had to laugh at the list of technology that were commonplace in 1964, but weren’t in 1951. If that’s the standard, the internet, widescreen TVs and iPhones weren’t commonplace in 1997, but were in 2007. So kudos to Blair on those, I guess.
McMillan has a lot of back story in regard to the old poor law around the time of the First World War. Churchill and McMillan were really old buffers at the end of the 1950s.
He also dodged a bullet over Suez.
First time watching, these 2 together are brilliant, thank you
I think when judging May’s legacy, you have to remember that she passed up the opportunity to fire Boris for hurting the UK abroad with that poem. She could have sacked him for a definite bad thing, clear and explainable, which had hurt the UK abroad.
You have to consider that everything Boris did, she caused, and everyone with any sense would have seen the possibility he might cause that sort of problems if allowed to continue.
You two are a total joy to watch you have differing views but are always respectful. Yeah I can tell Rory is very much on the left wing of the conservative voter so maybe the political void between you both isn’t as large as it can be in general politics but I enjoy watching each and every video you release. I’d have loved to see you on your tour but at £75 a ticket it was a little pricey for me. Keep up the good work.
I have to agree with them over Johnson (disastrously incompetent) and Truss (dangerously incompetent) as the worst two PMs. I think Truss could have won hands down had she been allowed any more time. However, it amazes me that both still have their passionate advocates.
There’s something incredibly funny about all the terrible things about T May being listed & then Stewart going ‘ok can I stop for a second there’
Disagreeing is not to shout at eachother. Disagreeing is listening and maybe come away with some understanding. The overalt process and outcome is better for that discussion. That is why polarisation is so damaging. Keep up the good work.
You have to call out the fash, my grandad fought for 6 years, was staunch for Churchill and now they cuddled up to the extremists for short term advantage with the results that are plain to see.
She did say one thing that i agree with in 2004 at the conservative party conference she called the conservative party the Nasty Party nothing has changed except for Rory and a few others in conservative party..
Her miss judgment was appointment of BJ as foreign secretary and Frost...
That was a political reality. A concession to the ERG to get them to back the Brexit deal. (It didn't work though did it)
Rory isn’t affected by any of the government’s policies, he’s sorted financially so he’s free to judge people like May based on his friendship with her
Yeah. It's not on us to find some deep good in these people.
Clement Attlee Was An Amazing Prime Minister Who Helped The British Economy And Britain Recover After WW2. He Passed The National Health Service And Supported The Working Class Of Britain. He Also Began Decolonisation And Decolonized India Pakistan And Burma. (Bangladesh Was East Pakistan At The Time) His Worst Mistake Was The 1951 General Election Which Allowed Churchill To Return To Office. Also Palestine.
In an alternate universe, Vidal and Buckley would be doing a podcast like this.
I felt that May put the needs of the Conservative Party before the needs of the Country.
The "beauty" of a two party system and one party long term regime :(
I think she is rigid minded and sticks to her views in spite of evidence that contradicts them. She ignores evidence.
It's better to have had her do that than have Corbyn be PM!
@@tombblades Not at all.
People join a party because they believe that party is best for the country.
There's one huge irony about the criticism of Theresa May's handling of Brexit - Had Alistair & comrades within Labour and the people's vote accepted the result, but campaigned for a softer Brexit; then we'd probably never have ended up with Boris, and a far closer relationship with the EU. Likewise, if they'd campaigned more publicly the result might have been different - something he appeared to concede in interviews
UKICE: You had a role advising the Britain Stronger In Europe campaign. What was your role?
AC: To be absolutely honest, I feel a little bit guilty about this, because I did not do that much. I think, like a lot of people, I felt it was not going to be lost. So, I went into their campaign HQ a few times, but I was not involved day to day. I thought Alan Johnson, who I really like and who I really get on with, suffered the whole time with what (Jeremy) Corbyn and acolytes were up to. Alan was leading the Labour side of the campaign, but without really having the backing of the actual Labour leadership.
Because you did not have Labour organising campaigning from the top and because Corbyn was so indifferent to the whole thing, that also sent a message to a lot of the trade unions, who I think could have done a lot more. They could have been much more active in terms of getting direct messaging to their members, and spelling out the true cost of what was going to happen.
ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness-archive/alastair-campbell/
A Swede as I am just love these two talking politics. Makes politic really attractive and lively....thank god for "normal" people talking normally
Ironical as the Swedes used to be a by word for moderation and rational decisions.
I can actually see Rory in Clement Attlee's cabinet. I think he would agree with a lot of his policies.
Favourite pm....Clem Atlee. A man who would never use a word if one would do.
Asked who was the best Labour Prime Minister the UK never got, Atlee said MacMillan. During the 1930s MacMillan was in conversation with Labour about crossing the floor.
The reason you guys agree on a whole lot of things (but not everything), is that you are both sensible, respectful, and know what you are talking about!
U 2 r great ❤
Most countries in Europe do have NI, the difference is that its ringfenced and you get a statement of exactly what percentage is for healthcare, pension fund, unemployment benefits etc.
- Best PM? Tony's not far behind Attlee, I mean Northern Ireland alone...
- Iraq war....
- I get that but still...
- Afghanistan, Privatization of NHS, Thatcher-lite
- Okay, that's enough.
- ASBOs, Chilcot, Racist remarks, financial crisis.
- I worked for him, Okay? What am I supposed to say, Rory?!!
The Road Fund Licence (Car Tax) was introduced decades ago when motorised transport expanded, in order to raise money for the needed road upgrades, bridges and motorways, but it has since become a way for a government just to raise money by another form of tax.. I remember when John Major was Chancellor, he stated that money raised by the Car Tax isn't necessarily spent just on road infrastructure (if at all) - the Car Tax is just put into the pot with all the other taxes raised - Income Tax, VAT, Excise Duty, Corporation Tax, etc, etc..... and spent how the government of the day wants...
The hostile environment is unforgivable
Can you guys do a ranking of Leaders of the Opposition next?
There are many more to choose from than PMs!
Neil Kinnock
Keir Starmer might arguably be the most effective LOTO since the war. Most by-election wins, shifting government policy, now on course for a supermajority.
In my lifetime I’d say John Smith. Can’t go Starmer, he doesn’t have anything like the natural groundswell of support that either Smith or Blair had - he has done an exceptional job of allowing the Tory party to stab themselves in the back though - but the performance remains far more about disgust with the Tory party than support for Labour in my opinion.
John Smith and Hugh Gaitskell
Dignity is no good if you are useless. To my mind she was rigid minded and stuck to poor judgements in spite of plenty of evidence proving her judgements were poor. She refused to listen and refused to take notice of evidence of what was happening on the ground and where her policies were not working or making things worse and that was before she was PM (as Secretary of State) as well as after.
I think her way of dealing with brexit was right.
But windrush was terrible. And her reaction to grenfell was terrible.
@@REG96AV Windrush, I think you mean. Yes I agree.
Love the fact that they immediately agree on the question about them not disagreeing enough.
CPF in Singapore and Superannuation in Australia works amazingly well compared to NI
It's difficult as i know Rory has great admiration for May, but we have to remember this was the lady that hated immigrants.
As home secretary, she used to write in the margins of bills that they were too soft on migrants and the wording should be beefed up to make life worse for them. The vans that circled parts of the country telling migrants to go home, that was her.
I remember when Ann Soubry defected to change, she said that Theresa May's extreme hatred of immigrants has scared her away. Ann mentioned that she had gone to speak to the PM and she was in the middle of a Xenophobic rant, a day before she defected..
I know we have had worse since then, but she really wasn't great. If she truelly regrets what she did, thats awesome, we don't need another doubling down Liz truss.
Amen.
Rory - you have brought together anecdotes about Baldwin and ADH from the same lecture.
Regarding Mrs May and her getting hard on immigrants….
For my sins I was in a Home Office meeting when we were told to use any means to stop issuing Passports to first time applicants on her orders. I had to stand up and tell the person delivering these orders that we were public civil servants, that we worked according to law, not to any Ministers political whim and the request to break that was disgraceful and illegal and I, for one, would have no part in it and neither should anyone else…. very abruptly the meeting ended and I was warmly congratulated on my way out of the room. Never the less I lived in fear of getting punished afterwards! Fortunately nothing came of it; but I can’t regard anything you might say warmly of her bearing in mind my experience.
Do watch the Channel 4 documentary, it is very good IMO. Boris Johnson is a tragic figure but also has a lot to answer for.
But "tragic" I take it you mean "criminal"
Attlee absolutely.
Rory seems to want attribute the achievements of McMillan as being from 1951 to 1963 which is a stretch. McMillan was not PM until '57, that very successful house building programme had been the creation of Attlee's tenure, and, oops, oh yes, in the meantime, we had the shocking Eden era.
This Rory dude should get a job and try to become a productive citizen.
IMO Theresa May prioritized her party over the wellbeing of the nation as a whole. She seemed ONLY to care about preventing the Tory Party from splitting into 2 or more factions. She REFUSED to co-operate with opposition parties over brexit and instead facilitated the hard right within her own party to go for a hard Brexit.
She seemed MORE than happy for the UK to leave not only the EU but the Single Market and the Customs' Union as well.
Moreover, she PROTECTED those responsible for the Grenfell Tower disaster. I am honestly BAFFLED by Rory's defence of her clearly piss-poor record.
Disagreeing does not mean that people are screaming and fighting 😂
Murderers often regret their actions, doesn't wipe away their actions. Windrush victims with cancer having treatment refused and made homeless... There are hundreds of MPs with dignity who have not/would not bring in horrendous policies.
Can’t see Sweden in the chapters. Maybe change the headline?
LORD PALMERSTON
that's not a postwar prime minister...
PITT THE ELDER!!
PITT THE ELDER
I think the reason may is seen as a reasonable person is partly because she has done some good work since being PM from the back benches , but also because compared to her three successors she stands head and shoulders above them for being statesman like and that may be due to them being appallingly terrible . Regarding Brexit I think she took the view that the electorate had decided and she had to honour that decision and perhaps she also did a 'Cameron ' by trying to put the divisions on Europe in the Tory Party to bed and ultimately making them much worse and allowing the pro Brexit hardliners to grow in strength .
Why the word 'whip' and how many whips would have been involved in a large party?
I read the title as "Ranking Post-War Crime Ministers" and was wondering how many Ministers have commited War Crimes
The mountain rescue story is in Rory's book. Alistair hasn't read it!
It's what you do in government and not on the back bench that shows true character. I am continually disappointed by how 'shocked' you Westminster bubble folk are at how angry we, the voters actually are about how this country has been governed over the past 14 PLUS years! Look at yourselves and learn from YOUR OWN MISTAKES, PLEASE!!!
Harold Wilson remains criminally underrated as ever.
So what did Harold do apart from his honours list?
Kept us out of Vietnam for one
@@RobBCactive He forgot what he had done.
@@schusterlehrling lol that's true! I had expected some justification for Harold being under-rated though.
I seriously doubt involvement in Vietnam was ever on the cards as the French were already defeated and the Suez debacle made foreign adventures unappealing.
Alex Douglas home is vey underrated
Corelli Barnett's book "The Lost Victory" documents the economic disasters of Attlee's government. The country went bankrupt in 1947 and all that nationalization sent the country on the wrong path. Attlee was almost a communist. Both parties were in favour of creating the NHS in 1945. Picking MacMillan illustrates that Rory was always in the wrong party. MacMillan was a Butskellite/social democrat and it was about managed decline. MacMillan met Eisenhower before Suez and didn't tell him what was being planned, Eden thought he had. MacMillan was ruthless and sneaky.
Rory's mental gymnastics in the defence of May is quite entertaining. Like a court jester. Amusing. No way to take it seriously, though.
IN regards to splitting out NI from Income Tax, Rory said very few places do that. I'd argue that Australia do it through the Medicare Levy. I think more transparency about it'#s use and putting it where it belongs would be better. I have no issue with paying NI if it is going towards Penions and the NHS. If it is just going to the general pool then that is misappropriation of funds and a far bigger issue.
I admire Rory, but his glib and easy acceptance and trivialising of the hostile environment and Windrush is really unsettling. Shows that deep he is very privileged and doesn't really get how it feels to be on the wrong end of policies like those.
It is the problem of being mates with them all. I take notice now every time Rory's decisions about someone are prefaced by either some story together or how they were friends. Alistair is very party political but Rory is the classic rich mates club type.
@@dreamcrusher112 Yeah, absolutely this. And he doesn't even seem to realise it.
It's Harold Wilson and Clement Attlee the 2 best
In my view populism is the political position that the People are uncorrupted (at an extreme, "pure") and have a single interest and a single will, and that the will of the People is being frustrated by a corrupt elite that pursues the interest of a foreign, alien, and/or self-serving minority. It denies not only that the people have different views, but also that they have interests that are to any extent rival. It denies all compromise, and also denies that there is any complexity of policy that is not apparent to the Will of the People.
Germany is an interesting comparison when it comes to Whips. German MPs have their right to use their vote according to their own judgement written into the constitution; which provides a nice counterbalance to the power of the whips.
Good dodge on last question Rory ever the politician 😂
Poor Rory! 😂
Speaking as someone who likes a hypothetical, I can appreciate that asking whether Rory would have done the honourable thing if he'd been in a situation brought about by an act that would have been, he says, too dishonourable to have been taken in the first place IS sort of unanswerable in any useful way. That is, I suspect that Rory means that a Rory who'd got into that position would be a different person from the one trying to respond to the question on his own behalf.
Obviously, he could still have done more to opine on what the right thing to do would have been for a person generally. He could also have reflected on when he feels it's right for someone to resign, etc..
On the topic itself, more generally, I wonder if there's a strong enough convention that the department pays for its political head's balls-ups that any fine would be chosen with that in mind. The publicity around her statement was compounded by the department being fined, increasing the political damage to the individual and the regime backing them. That IS a kind of punishment. I'll let others debate whether the magnitude was sufficient. I suppose that making somebody more politically toxic than before can even have direct consequences of greater magnitude insofar as they're made less likely to get roles in government, aside from being an MP.
Attlee 100%
I disagree that the principled position on NI is merge rather than abolish. I think the principled position is to ring fence it again, and do the same with Road Tax. I'd MUCH rather pay directly for the things everyone *needs* and know that those things will be provided, than have it all hidden in general taxation and politicians be able to spaff it all up the wall on their mates. Granularity is transparency - and *that* is why I think the conservatives favour getting rid of it.
And perhaps that's an unfair characterisation of the conservative party - but after the last 10 years especially I'd kind of like to hear how.
Absolutely, I also believe we should have a system they have in Australia here, in which they send a letter every year to everyone showing how much tax they paid and they break down where their money was spent.
Ring fencing doesn't work. If you have a surplus you can't use it. If you have too little you can't get the money from elsewhere. That has always been the problem. Government revenues are NEVER predictable, nor are the precise amounts that will be needed for services like health.
Nice
Alistair's comparison btw the stage of public debate on colonial legacy in UK and FR is off - Public debate is raging rn in Fr, sure, but that's because it's only just been initiated. UK is couple stages down the line. I know the landscape well as lived lifelong in both.
My impression of May and Brexit is that at every crunch point she put Party before Country and refused to take on the hard line Brexiteers because it would split the party
NI does act as a qualifying contribution for certain benefits and you can pay voluntary NI contributions (in certain appropriate circumstances) to protect your state pension entitlement, but you can't pay voluntary tax and you may not be working and paying tax when you pay voluntary NI contributions to protect your state pension entitlement. I don't see how that would work if income tax is the only one that qualifies people for pensions.
Where is the discussion about Sweden joining NATO? I don't see it on the timeline menu.
Scratch Rory’s veneer of reasonableness and concern to reveal the snarling face of privilege, a true tory.
Truss was so bad she doesn't even seriously enter the running. You can at least say Boris was a bad PM. Truss wasn't even 1/2 of THAT.
I am a big fan of Rory.i have been a labour voter all my life. But would have voted for Rory if he had lead the Tories. Me and my wife run a foodbank which is basically an attempt to realise something of the Big Society. Please come back to me if you are interested. We have handed out about £20millin of food and baby supplies. And nearly all our funding is self generated.
@pmmagro I find your description to be like the classic historiography that every Swede can recite by heart, but in my opinion is quite different. I agree with you to the extent that as you write "in reality behind closed doors" but choose to go considerably further and that everyone in decision-making positions knew about it because it happened in practice completely openly and because the Americans acted without any restrictions, which indicated that the officers in the military leadership wanted to be caught in order to then force the politicians on a decision to join NATO already then, which the ruling party Social Democrats understood and as a result constantly ran between the Prime Minister's Office and the Embassy of the Soviet Union to dampen the reactions and blame the right-wing parties for infiltration among the officers without showing a response for the public. This created anger among those in power in Finland at the time who felt that they exposed the immediate area to unnecessary risks, which is glaring today when the two defense commands are very close to each other thanks to the former Minister of Defense Peter Hultqvist as one of the 70,000 Finnish war children who fled to Sweden for protection during the Winter War.
People died, human beings were treated worse than animals, her hostile environment was deliberately designed to traumatise a specific group of people because she's evil. She is devoid of any shred of moral fibre.
Sweden has been neutral since 1814. So 1814-2024. We have always been anti-Russian through. When Putin tried to forbid Sweden and Finland who we can co-operate with with a taint of "or else" it was a given we had to do something. Finland is very key to Swedes. We do have a special bond to all Scandinavian countries but Sweden-Finland are the two twin siblings or closest siblings in age of the family for Swedes (Etsonia being the newest/youngest sibling with Latvia next).
As we have always been anti Russian and co-operated militarily with the US after WW2 (in reality behind closed doors) it is now a more honest position.
I find your description to be like the classic historiography that every Swede can recite by heart, but in my opinion is quite different. I agree with you to the extent that as you write "in reality behind closed doors" but choose to go considerably further and that everyone in decision-making positions knew about it because it happened in practice completely openly and because the Americans acted without any restrictions, which indicated that the officers in the military leadership wanted to be caught in order to then force the politicians on a decision to join NATO already then, which the ruling party Social Democrats understood and as a result constantly ran between the Prime Minister's Office and the Embassy of the Soviet Union to dampen the reactions and blame the right-wing parties for infiltration among the officers without showing a response for the public. This created anger among those in power in Finland at the time who felt that they exposed the immediate area to unnecessary risks, which is glaring today when the two defense commands are very close to each other thanks to the former Minister of Defense Peter Hultqvist as one of the 70,000 Finnish war children who fled to Sweden for protection during the Winter War.
Keep disagreeing respectfully please, most of my news comes from the left, A Different Bias, Truth to Power and such and I do need balance but Rory is the only Tory I will listen to, admittedly before this particular crop there were decent people amongst the Tories and on the Government benches, Rudd for instance but this lot just make me angry so keep going as you are.
She reached out to the DUP, didn't she? If she had offered a border poll that would have been helpful.
Not sure why “she regrets doing that” is an argument in defence of May on the Go Home vans. It’s not like hindsight is required to understand how horrific that was. Equally, I find it extraordinary to hear people trying pretend May made real efforts towards a soft Brexit. Her choice of personnel in the key positions and her actions, from “Brexit means Brexit” to the insane triggering of Article 50 before any plan was in place forced us down the hard Brexit route. Similarly, Windrush wasn’t forced on her, it was a deliberate choice and the appalling consequences were entirely foreseeable.
I’ve only ever once been convinced by May expressing sadness, and that was when she cried at being kicked out. I’ve never seen any evidence that she can feel or show compassion for others.
Best labour..Clement Attlee…best conservative..John Major..
Atlee by a mile. What he did in one term is more than most Do in two or three terms.
And Rory, TM was all that.
Windrush, for the person unlawfully bundled on a plane, wasnt on the same par as two ex politico’s thinking about retrospective ‘context’
Wasn't really a ranking 😂 was more a 'who is the worst, who is the best'
Be honest the whip is the party blackmailer.
"As a 'Citizen of Nowhere,' her words not mine, Theresa May couldn't hold a candle to Clement Atlee. She was the Prime Minister of Nothing. Harsh? Well, not as harsh as being a Windrush victim or being an immigrant and seeing those vans driving around, something Lee Anderson would be proud of. But the blame for the hard Brexit does equally lie with people like Corbyn and Starmer for not seeing what failure to help her would bring down on the country.
Clement Atlee was one of the greats. Not for the NHS, but because of the other N words: nuclear weapons.
May really messed up a lot of peoples lives with Windrush, people died, British people.
Listened to the ‘leading’ on May, she is still an awful PM 🙄
I fully agree with Rory. Whatever happened she was someone with integrity who was caught in a very difficult context. After all, like other human beings we are not infallibile. But she tried unlike the clown(s) who followed.
For Tessa May it was one compromise too many. The people had voted to leave and they were disrespected and ignored. Simples.
Clement Attlee was not the best PM because even without Attlee much of what Labour did would have happened anyway. I would say Thatcher was clearly the best PM (whatever you think of her policies) because she absolutely dominated as PM and won three elections, and changed a whole bunch of things often through the force of her personality. Not to say everything was down to Maggie but she certainly had a big impact. Attlee was a good chairman of the board but I don't think he was a leader like Thatcher. Best govt and best PM are not the same!
boris johnson as one of the worst is total recency bias, although i agree for liz truss, the other one would probably be callaghan or blair for easily the worst foreign policy in british history
Teresa may will not be remembered well, if at all
Sunak has attempted to do populism, when he gave that conference on the Rwanda bill and said the lords would be blocking “the will of the people”, a PM with no mandate and their 2019 manifesto made no mention of Rwanda, it was a pathetic attempt at being a populist.
But I am a citizen of nowhere, I belong to nowhere except with the people I love and those people live on Sesame Street. Do you know what it is like to be from nowhere?
Maga's Vs Rino's a good example of popularist bullying in politics today.👍👍
Lol, these two agreed on disagreeing at the very beginning :D How's that a disagreement. Try disagreeing on agreeing next time!
Atlee for NHS and McMillan for improving the standard of living.
I visited West Germany aged 18 with my £50 maximum of foreign currencythe week that MacMillan announced 'you've never had it so good'. When I saw the prosperity and lifestyle I realised what a lier!
38:40 that was quite disingenuous in misspresenting Why the Turks were not keen on them joining NATO.
Torsten Bell is considering standing for the Labour Party? Don't know how I feel about that news.
I have similar feelings to the guys (particularly Alastair, for once) that although Think Tanks are often deeply ideological, divisive things, there are a handful around at the moment who are doing a good job of building real space in a new middle ground where the parties are otherwise scrambling.They manage to somehow come off as less narrowly ideological and more pragmatic, though in truth I suspect that's a trick of the light, and there's a strong argument that they actually represent the likely outline of the new post neo-liberal settlement. I've found that tapping into the likes of the IFS and Resolution Foundation feels a better way to get a handle on the future of our politics than following the daily Tory / Labour dramas.
TM lied to my MP about having further opportunities to vote down brexit proposals in order to get her to support on bills for brexit. "Meaningful votes" and all that.
An important, but not yet learned, lesson for MPs of all flavours not to grant PM access to the accelerator and steering unless you've got guaranteed control of the brakes.
It annoys me when people cannot see the difference between having a reasonable debate, conversation verses seeking an argument who would want that!! Great podcast both get views across clear do not agree on everything and as adults able to say that 🙄