These ladies seem like my kind of fighters: Horror themed, highly thematic, and fun to play. They'll probably join Jekyll/Hyde and Bloody Mary as one of my favorite characters. This set is everything I could have hoped for and more.
While Shakespere looks like Little Red with Sinbad flavour- this looks like Raptors, now with magic! Also realy like that they return some cards from old decks in new ones, like prophecy here and glance in titania. And art here and in Hamlet is just over the top.
Some of these cards are making me wonder if a "full cauldron" playstyle might work against certain heros, where the block and attack cards that depend on whats in the cauldron are just about always 5 and 6, getting the full 3 healing every time, and abusing recursion to get those cards back. ...probably not but I want to try
If your cauldron is empty and you attack with Hurly Burly, if they choose to put the top card in the cauldron, you instantly have 2 cards in your cauldron and can cast a spell with a snake.
Question, in the tuke book it is said ''you MAY use a card you just attacked with as an ingridient in your spell.'' So that makes me incline to believe that you can actualy save that card if you don't realy need it just by not using it. What do you think?
As I understand, you could attack, cast a spell with your cauldron cards, then put your card in the cauldron. Or instead, cast a spell using your attack card, so the card goed in the discard pile
I think I like that opponent chooses for Hurly Burly. But there is a lot going into that choice because like you mentioned, they gotta consider the boost value. But they also have to consider the card itself (are they ok with you having it) and the symbol (will it enable a spell the wouldn't want). All 3 of those together means the witches player probably gets decent value either way if I had to guess. They might even choose to take 2-3 damage from a high boost if they really don't want you to have that card. So complex but this video is finally getting me intrigued to the point where I want to figure them out rather than staying intimidated in AP land haha
I am dying to play the sisters. Love the card art and I like the minis. They are probably the weakest fighter in the pack but still like them the best.
i'm pretty sure that "After you attack" is before discarding the attack card? that means that if you attack with Double, Double with a full cauldron, you don't waste Double Double because it goes into your cauldron after. Because i don't see why they would add that you MAY use your attack card as an ingredient in the rule book?
The sisters are definitely my favorites out of this set. I'm a bit disappointed with the other 3 fighters because they all look weak to me and their effects are very situational. The witches also don't look very strong to me, but at least they will be great into multiple-sidekick heroes (including Medusa, Dracula, and Sun Wukong, though not sure about Yennenga). There are a lot of synergies in the deck and the arts are amazing. I would really want to play them a lot
I've seen the other fighters in action and they are not weak! They won't all be TTA level tournament breakers but they're all at least average strength with Shakespeare being pretty high
@@noahduncan4095 Great to hear it. I haven't played any of them yet so can just theorize. I'm surprised because all these characters' values are not that high and a lot of effects look questionable to me. Also, Hamlet's ability looks very weird because he does not have an optimal choice and might struggle with its effects from turn one. But I really hope they are all better than I think
These ladies seem like my kind of fighters: Horror themed, highly thematic, and fun to play. They'll probably join Jekyll/Hyde and Bloody Mary as one of my favorite characters. This set is everything I could have hoped for and more.
While Shakespere looks like Little Red with Sinbad flavour- this looks like Raptors, now with magic!
Also realy like that they return some cards from old decks in new ones, like prophecy here and glance in titania.
And art here and in Hamlet is just over the top.
Some of these cards are making me wonder if a "full cauldron" playstyle might work against certain heros, where the block and attack cards that depend on whats in the cauldron are just about always 5 and 6, getting the full 3 healing every time, and abusing recursion to get those cards back.
...probably not but I want to try
Stars align can even hit 8, but only on the new ker morhen map
Rosie is the best Unmatched blogger!
If your cauldron is empty and you attack with Hurly Burly, if they choose to put the top card in the cauldron, you instantly have 2 cards in your cauldron and can cast a spell with a snake.
As long as the discarded card isn't snake as well
Hey, does the new rule for chosing which sister is hit by "your hero" effects is also applied to Raptors from now on?
Yes
Question, in the tuke book it is said ''you MAY use a card you just attacked with as an ingridient in your spell.'' So that makes me incline to believe that you can actualy save that card if you don't realy need it just by not using it. What do you think?
As I understand, you could attack, cast a spell with your cauldron cards, then put your card in the cauldron. Or instead, cast a spell using your attack card, so the card goed in the discard pile
I think I like that opponent chooses for Hurly Burly. But there is a lot going into that choice because like you mentioned, they gotta consider the boost value. But they also have to consider the card itself (are they ok with you having it) and the symbol (will it enable a spell the wouldn't want). All 3 of those together means the witches player probably gets decent value either way if I had to guess. They might even choose to take 2-3 damage from a high boost if they really don't want you to have that card. So complex but this video is finally getting me intrigued to the point where I want to figure them out rather than staying intimidated in AP land haha
Something wicked really is just 1 damage + 1 heal + draw a card, huh?
Seems pretty strong
THE SNEK!!!! 😂
Triptych is correct! 🍍
I am dying to play the sisters. Love the card art and I like the minis. They are probably the weakest fighter in the pack but still like them the best.
i'm pretty sure that "After you attack" is before discarding the attack card? that means that if you attack with Double, Double with a full cauldron, you don't waste Double Double because it goes into your cauldron after. Because i don't see why they would add that you MAY use your attack card as an ingredient in the rule book?
Crap i'm wrong i think
The sisters are definitely my favorites out of this set. I'm a bit disappointed with the other 3 fighters because they all look weak to me and their effects are very situational. The witches also don't look very strong to me, but at least they will be great into multiple-sidekick heroes (including Medusa, Dracula, and Sun Wukong, though not sure about Yennenga). There are a lot of synergies in the deck and the arts are amazing. I would really want to play them a lot
I've seen the other fighters in action and they are not weak! They won't all be TTA level tournament breakers but they're all at least average strength with Shakespeare being pretty high
@@noahduncan4095 Great to hear it. I haven't played any of them yet so can just theorize. I'm surprised because all these characters' values are not that high and a lot of effects look questionable to me. Also, Hamlet's ability looks very weird because he does not have an optimal choice and might struggle with its effects from turn one. But I really hope they are all better than I think
Imo its probably the best balanced 4 pack yet! It just takes some time to grok