SpaceX Nails Landing of Reusable Rocket on Land
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024
- Jun.30 -- SpaceX launches 88 satellites, including three for Starlink, into orbit. Elon Musk says he wants to use the Starlink satellites to beam broadband internet everywhere in the world except the polar regions by August. After this latest launch, the Falcon 9 first stage rocket came back to Earth and landed at Cape Canaveral, instead of on a drone ship out in the ocean.
I don't think people truly understand how difficult this is. Seriously. How the hell does this cylinder stabilize enough for a pinpoint landing?
because the earth's surface is stationery and not spinning 1000mph, once Elons landing rockets get developed it'll be over for NASA
@Loisl Ali Space X isn't fake. His reusable rocket program is very real.
Deception is real
It's so difficult is impossible
@krelbar hahaha. Right. And we can trust your word because you were part of the crew who made it possible...
When I was a kid the old sci-fi ships used to land like this
Now it’s not sci fi
@@ziggity7851now it’s just sci lmao
@@TheInterestingInformer we lost fi 🙄🙄🙄
@@stephenmartinez8772 cause it's all the same technology just a little more advanced and still fake and lame
Thunderbirds are go…
so the first time I saw this, I was convinced someone was playing a video backwards, my brain just could not process its brilliance…I don’t know about anyone else, but deffo on my bucket list to watch this for real 🤔
@Holcroft1969 ELON IS THE WORLDS SMARTET MAN..
Someone pls tell me how we landed o. The moon in 1979
@@LilPolo-xd4hn We didn't. However, if you'd like me to, I could give you a detailed description of how NASA landed people on the Moon in 1969.
@@raptorwhite6468thats funny as fuck
AMAZING!!!
Space x has done such a wonderful job landing these boosters over the years. These days its seems kind of normal.
It never gets old for me... I do not want to get complacent like people did after Apollo 11
seems normal but this is insane to watch.
Nothing normal about it, that's completely wild
That's the point..they wanna normalize and do it at big scale
After watching last night’s launch, I still get excited for the landing. I applauded at my screen when the booster touched down.
Dude. This is HUGE. Future of humanity huge
Remember when things like this were a Global life changing experience to witness.. Now people would rather watch a 6 second clip and scroll on to the next pointless video like it was nothing. Makes you wonder if we even deserve to bother going out beyond the stars.
We do. We worked for it, and contrary to what the "Let's fix all the problems here first" freeloaders say, staying here indefinitely is a guarantee of extinction.
Thank Sheldon for it
NOW LET'S CURE CANCER, HEART DISEASE, MS, etc.
@@JamesBond-ml3zp great idea. Would be a lot easier to do once we are able to mine resources from space and drop the prices of building materials to dirt cheap by practically eliminating the scarcity of our terrestrial body.
That Never Gets Old.
This is FAKE af that’s why
@LJ...69. so is your mom 😅
Just another day launching and landing rockets. Amazing job spacex team!
@Science Revolution Google it
This is FAKE af
Why don’t we have hundreds of different videos of these landings? Why can’t I book a ticket myself to see a landing?
is there any footage where they land one with one continuous camera?
Yes but when there is they "lose signal" right as its landing everytime.
@@Flipdodge392 lol. it's pantomime for the hypnotised masses.
@@Kunn1ngDruger The excited people along with the clapping is the best selling point lmao
Until I see it with my own eyes or someone I know does, I won't believe it's real.
@@Kunn1ngDruger Yes there are continuous videos from third parties everywhere, just look up SpaceX landing videos.
In hindsight, it's strange that it took us this long to design something reusable.
us? what you mean us? try again my dude, it is not us! More like Elon, you can't just tack us on every accomplishment, gotta give it to the man who literally willing to lose everything so you can see it happened! Not even the great USA did it, the flag of USA is there just for show off really!
Well in the past, the technology that we have can't possibly do this
@@unknownone3680 no Nasa didn't want to make landing rockets because it'll debunk their bs gravity and spinning earth - Nasa make 53million a day selling lies and CGI images
NASA rockets have always been reusable. Space x have just made them land fancy.
Because it’s very difficult to do it. My father worked during the Apollo project for NASA and all the smart people they couldn’t figure out. Elon did and nobody celebrated it. I think most people are jealous of him or something. It’s easy criticize but doing something like this it’s very difficult.
All the launches I used to watch, the rockets flew eastwards. Does this rocket actually have enough juice to return back to the pad and land?
This is a 2-stage rocket.
The first stage (booster) returns to earth, while the second stage continues into earth orbit.
Any upcomming launches that will return to cape canaveral? Would love to watch this in person
If you think you can land a light pole falling from the sky you will believe ANYTHING
ruclips.net/video/jD64qh4_eiY/видео.html
Horrible edit - left out the best video of the landing taken from below. Look elsewhere, it's worth it!
Looks like an old science fiction movie landing! That’s crazy!
Boggles the mind how a cylinder can stay stabilized on liftoff....let alone on touchdown.
That's right. It should boggles your mind because it's physically impossible. Every part of your being says bs but your stubbornness and ignorance say right on.
It's TV with jump cuts and cgi. Another fake religion
@@eli8589are you a flat-earther or something?
@@eli8589 Its 'impossible'...but yet there it is. Are you saying these landings are faked? If so, where is your proof?
@@eli8589 You're a flat-earther, aren't you?
So, how many times do they expect to reuse these boosters? Do they plan to part them out to reuse the shells while replacing the engines at some point? I watched the Saturn launches and before them. My comparison, these launches seem routine and without the constant expectation at that the next one would blow up on the pad. I suspect thaat much of difference between then and now is the computers, the ones used to design and test the designs now before they get launched, and even more so, the large number of computers which control every aspect of the rocket's functions. The computing power in a Saturn rocket wouldn't have run an I-Pad.
Some boosters up to 30 times.
Yes, engines get swapped out quite regularly.
P.S. it wouldn't have run a simple calculator, let alone an iPad 😅
The amount of math required to program this is AMAZING
The amount of fakery required to program this is AMAZING.
@@eli8589fakery? 😂😂
@@zzuro. Yea, this guy (@eli8589) is a flat-earther I think. He's been all through these comments, calling this fake.
Interesting that you say fakery. This raises the question as to how the lunar lander was able to do this successfully back in 1969 on the moon without an atmosphere (think, although less gravitational pull, there is no terminal velocity to aid the descent).@@eli8589
Yeah amazing how smoothly it landed and how the landing arms dispursed just cm's from the ground 😂
Is there also a video of this that is not animated?
Did YOU actually make your comment?
Did SpaceX start to actually re-use them? Or are these new everytime?
They reuse the first stage and the fairings currently, I believe. The upper stage burns up on re-entry and is new each launch.
So if this is real why the speed keep increasing?
_Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement_
If you think this technology will end at space travel you are severely naive
The lunar lander was able to do this successfully back in 1969, on the moon without an atmosphere (think, although less gravitational pull, there is no terminal velocity to aid the descent) and take off again.
Cebok?
Why wouldn’t this work on the moon or mars as long as you change the programming to account for the difference in gravity? You may need some extendable legs like earlier versions in case you land on a slope.
It would. Ideally with different engines, as fewer, larger engines do better in vacuum. The hard part is getting the equipment to those locations in the first place.
Wonder if I can get my Estes rocket to do that. Hmmm
Парни, а где можно посмотреть все шансы на эту игру? А то я не совсем пойду как оно считается
It would've been better if you included the tracking shot
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
Why did it land on Cape Canaveral now instead of the drone ship
The payload was light enough that it had enough fuel to boost back to the cape.
I cant imagine a more grand illustration of the difference computers can make, connected to sensors reading altitude and controlling thrust and thrust vectoring, to gently place that thing in exactly the right spot, without tipping over! 🤣
The only way to land a cylindrical rocket vertically would have to involve a lot of different rockets located all over the place to maintain the correct trim. And it would have to hover and descend really slowly the last few yards. Forget vectoring. That might work for a plane to land on its wheels but never to back down and land on its tail. Those grid control surfaces would be no use at all backing down. Spacex is mass delusion and that makes Elon a fraud.
I’m not gonna lie the first time I saw a video of one of these boosters landing itself like this I couldn’t believe it, thought it had to be fake. It’s amazing to see this progression of technology in my lifetime and I hope that what we are seeing is the beginning of a space age. The idea of possibly watching somebody set foot on Mars or the moon live is marvelous.
I felt the same way! The hairs on my arms were raised with joy/excitement/wonderment...I dunno exactly what it was...but I felt 12 years old again watching the space shuttle launches. Damn near cried. I love this!
I'm here because i though there's no way this is real .they have to be running the footage backwards. I am pleasantly surprised to find out I was wrong
All right little believer...
@@jenzuiderveen6247 you are pleasantly willing to deceive yourself.
@@eli8589 Listen if you think it's fake that's okay I get it but you don't have to belittle people for something
Saw different versions of this 5 years ago. This is quite possibly one of the coolest and satisfying things I've ever seen. I was by myself but cheered.
I used to make these same videos with my friends in high school.
We never used a cheer and clap track in our videos though. Nice touch
Only difference is this is real
Their CGI keeps getting better and better
Go to Florida go to the KSC find a scheduled launch and watch but you are probably a bot
@@beenchillin2yill197 bro its fake they have proved it
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102 when
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102you can literally go watch them land you peanut
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102You can literally watch it with your own eyes...
Do some research before believing every conspiracy.
Doesn't matter how many times i have seen this, It just doesn't look real. Bravo Elon.
Here after two years and making 300 launches and landings.
I heard the sonic booms over in Melbourne but too many clouds to see it.
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
I was at the bridge by the base my ears are still ringing
0:24.....I swear to God...
EVERYTIME they show it this way,...
IT...... LOOKS...... FAKE!
pick a better camera angle SpaceX please?!
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
There are thousands of people who saw it live with their own eyes.
@Farhan Dany Fachrullah c'est toi le drone
Mais c'est toi le fake!
That camera angle is near perfect though?
Untucking real. Absolutely amazing. It’s so astonishing that it looks almost fake. I just can’t…great job people… great job
I think it looks fully fake.
Sheldon has done it
American technology is something else extraordinary from the world, i still bealive it's the best country
no u not , u the most hated , and soon to be bought down a few pegs
Credits to Sheldon, 'bout time they catch up😂
I can't believe people think this is real.
🤣😂🤣
Same bra lol
i mean, if that thing went to space from one spot, then came back from space and landed in the same spot...incredible
I’m starting to notice this more it’s like it hit some it never leaves the earth atmosphere. Firmament question mark?✝️like if it’s free falling around the planet and not actually leaving.
Soy el unico que se emociona llorando viendo esto?
ВО! Побольше бы такого контента) Не ленись чел, снимай видосы почаще)
I remember hearing about this for the first time in starbase in 5th grade, he hadn't yet done it and we all thought that was crazy and impossible even at 10, now it's just common news
Meanwhile aliens observing this: Wow they finally made those, it's been a thousand years since when our ancestors made that kind of tech.
Wheres the live moon cam? What? Can't do it? Wheres the moon cam elon. Total bs.
this is unreal.
so cool
Unreal, yes. Cool, not at all.
It's as unreal as it gets.
Maybe one day they will actually do it for real?
Rocket launching getting commentated like a sporting event 😂
I think space shuttles and rockets are different because space shuttles takes off and land like an aeroplane and rockets don’t take off and land like an aeroplane
I think space shuttles and rockets both go to space.
Question 1. Do you agree with me that I think space shuttles and rockets are different because space shuttles takes off and land like an aeroplane and rockets don’t take off and land like an aeroplane ?
Question 2. Do you agree with me that I think space shuttles and rockets both go to space?
Landing on the boat in the ocean was unbelievable feat
Congrats Lonnie!
Unbelievable!
Agreed. Because it is not real.
ruclips.net/video/jD64qh4_eiY/видео.html
@@robertfonovic3551it is real
NASA has been trying this for years. SpaceX: "hold my beer "
CGI dept, "Hold my beer, again"
NASA wasn't trying that for years, from where did you got that idea?
The moon landing maybe lol
@@tgstudio85 ruclips.net/video/jD64qh4_eiY/видео.html
Brasileiro: Foguete não tem ré.
Elon Musk: What did you say? 🤭
Seeing SpaceX successfully recycle their booster module made me think about a maths question that perhaps you can help me with. Rocket boosters burn 700,000 gallons of fuel per second to achieve escape velocity. How many gallons of fuel will it be needed for Elon to propel his head out of Donald Trump’s a$$$?
Saves tremendously 👍🏾
No suprise ...
If they can nail it on a moving ship a stable earth platform is easy .....
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
They even landed 2 of these boosters simultanously on land a few years ago, for the Falcon Heavy test. So it’s not even a first, just another landing..
I thought earth was spinning 1000 miles per hour?
@@Datanditto Not when you are only one hundred metres above it ....
@@markjmaxwell9819 then why do people that shoot guns adjust for earth spin? You cant have it both ways.
im not sure if people have seen how dangerous this things are. When they first were designed them they were falling of the sky. Now they land on earth, but what surprises me is the velocity rate at which the are falling. To me if seems as fast as a missile. The rocket comes in to land at a velocity of 24 thousand miles per hour. This is relatively as fast as the International space station travel !!!! thats sooooo cool like CHarlie !!
The rocket ISN'T travelling at '24 thousand miles per hour' when it comes into land.
With that one remark, you completely destroyed any credibility you had in the discussion.
@@sailorman8668 what’s your educated guess at which the rocket is coming into orbit ? According to google the booster is flying at a fast velocity before the engines deploy. Please explain your reasoning
Naprosto dokonalé přístání
I cried the first time I watched this
Is there no way to connect duck energy by coming back to earth like a turbine 😊 I love it
This is amazing. Only Tintin had such a rocket. This company is leading applied robotics, under Elon Musk leadership 👍
I don’t know why, it looks so fake , look like computer effect
You actually don't think this video shows real footage?
You should have stopped after you typed 'I don't know'.
Clearly, there are MANY things you 'don't know'.
@@sailorman8668
What I mean is this footage doesn’t look real to me for some reason.
It is a difference between “ look real” and “look fake” But that doesn’t mean I think it is fake or real.
@@brucelee270 ruclips.net/video/jD64qh4_eiY/видео.html
Sheldon calculated this
The way the rocket drops back down looks really fake tbh.
Surprised its from Bloomberg
Nice Reverse video 0:21
*Everybody cheers*
@@TurielTyrael44-bf1ld6zu6s
Not everybody, only software cheers !!
>>> 0:24
No rocket EVER LAUNCHES that way. There's always a gantry involved. Do your damn homework before you make a ridiculous comment, and look like a fool.
@@WayneGreen-r6z
0:24 >>> Yes, I did...
@@WayneGreen-r6z Reversed video
That's technology at it's finest, progress that borderlines on scary.
That's Hollywood,m baby!
Nailed the landing
That is just insane wow
Click bait bloomberg..space x has been landing this boosters for years..how about "space x lands once again in spectacular fashion" as a title? or maybe it will not fit on a RUclips title...
Shoot the fook oop
@@thatswhatithought6519 Behave normal.
@@Engineer9736 how about no
INCREDIBLE!!!! The man has done more for Space travel than NASA did!!!!
This man ... Who is really and where come from?
Terran technology. Preparing for Zerg
I suggest that if they can also use parachute at the end to get the nose of starship to the right position and for the proper safe landing would it be helpfull🤔
SoaceX did this in 20 yrs where NASA could not in 60 yrs. Why? The power of private enterprise.
Looks like in science fiction movies!
crazy visual
Terran dream is much closer. Hell yeah
Beautiful symmetry
WOW! A LANDING rocket! Get out of town! Surprised I hadn't heard about this before. This is AMAZING! I only heard about a rocket landing in Trump's victory speech.
Well, dc-x was capable of landing as well, years ago 🤔
it was a couple of hop tests... sadly the program was cancelled, it never got to space.😔
I can not believe it happened in three years
Looks really, really fake!
Elon musk should have his face put on the 200 dollar bill. He has r l literally made history so many times
More than most other humans who are on it. So called leaders. Politician shitheads that puts humanity into war every few decades.
Just make sure it's re-usable and has zero net carbon footprint
@@rodschmidt8952 well, by its nature it will be reusable😉 😁
Why not on the 300 dollar bill
As easy as taking candy from a baby
I dont think many people can quite appreciate how significant this is to humankind.
That is amazing what alot of money can do.
My greatest salute for your dedication Mr. Elon Musk ...
Save 😊❤😊
Holy Shit that is mind blowing absolutely phenomenal😊
It will be like a big battery 🔋 making electricity coming back to Earth 🌍 is there such a way 😁 I love it 💕
How can anyone believe this is real?
Esto es más increíble que el plan economico de Milei. Pero el pueblo elige creer. Ellos son amigos. Salud a los crédulos
Nice parking
Forward
I cannot believe how much of a fake this looks like
Soooo... it must be Thurs.