I bet lots of portrait painters lost their jobs when photography came out, and yet painters are not obsolete. Instead realism in painting stopped being interesting to artists in favor ofcubism, dadaism, etc. If your art can be "replicated" by a machine then the art itself evolves.
I like how Verge has taken time to add some intro clips to set the context before showing the conference clips, it makes the transition much more smooth!
Microsoft’s point of view on AI is correct. It should not be at the expense of human creativity that’s why it’s called ‘co-pilot’. It’s a co-creator, a supporting tool - it’s not ‘take over’ type thing. They understand the nuance between this new technology and human ability and not taking away agency or the sanctity of our ability.
Gotta love the basic "yeah, nobody knows what the value of copilot is, so we didn't price it in a way that sells us short". Aka, it's not entirely cost to run setting that price, but we aren't gonna start at a cheaper price and leave money on the table.
Cool how they are going full on on their vision, I like people who are direct, I use bing every day and their image generation and ai ChatGPT is good for generating ideas for drawings.
If he's not confirming the leaks about Microsoft silicon, then why mention them at that point? That would make no sense. So yes, he's confirming those leaks.
Market places to be fair? You mean how Windows 11 fights tooth and nail to trick and force you into using Edge/Bing at every corner? How Windows makes it extremely hard to change the default browser and makes it literally impossible to set non-Edge for certain user journeys? How Microsoft literally INJECTS a banner into the Chrome download page and also has a pop up blocking the download button? Are these "fair" strategies?
So much of this "AI" stuff is creating barriers more than anything. I can search for something manually on Bing in a fraction of the time, and I don't need to rehash the data to ensure it's being properly compiled and coming from reliable sources. This also represents a massive dumbing down of users. We already have serious issues with misinformation and people not knowing how to spot unreliable sources. This compounds those issues. So many other issues with how this is being pushed, but those ought to be enough to cause pause.
If people get all the value they need from a summarized version of your content, then your content was too long and bloated to begin with. Is that simple.
I get your point, but I think you're wrong, at least partially. Even if the content is high quality, well summarized and not too long, the search engine can still present it to you and the website doesn't get traffic.
@@KarlDag That's to a large extent already true. E.g. Google's answers pulled from the web. Unless it's something very simple, a snippet of the content isn't going to provide the same value as reading the whole thing, and if it does (or it's very close), then the original piece was bloated or very simple to begin with.
@@augustofretes yes, it wont provide equal value, but it doesn't need to provide the same value, it just needs to pretend it is the same value even when the AI is completely wrong.
Do you think AI will discourage people from making art, or will it be a tool used to create new forms of art?
Honestly I think it will empower more people to start creating art and to find new ways of integrating ai into their creations.
I bet lots of portrait painters lost their jobs when photography came out, and yet painters are not obsolete. Instead realism in painting stopped being interesting to artists in favor ofcubism, dadaism, etc. If your art can be "replicated" by a machine then the art itself evolves.
I like how Verge has taken time to add some intro clips to set the context before showing the conference clips, it makes the transition much more smooth!
Chapters ! This type of videos seriously needs chapters
Great interview. Glad I checked back on the videos. You did great and the whole conversation was awesome.
Microsoft’s point of view on AI is correct. It should not be at the expense of human creativity that’s why it’s called ‘co-pilot’. It’s a co-creator, a supporting tool - it’s not ‘take over’ type thing. They understand the nuance between this new technology and human ability and not taking away agency or the sanctity of our ability.
Gotta love the basic "yeah, nobody knows what the value of copilot is, so we didn't price it in a way that sells us short". Aka, it's not entirely cost to run setting that price, but we aren't gonna start at a cheaper price and leave money on the table.
They will do everything except fixing the UI on mobiles of how sites & results r displayed.
I thought the ' silhouette ' in the middle is really a art work, until ' it ' moves......
Great work Nilay, as usual.... 👍😎✌️
Cool how they are going full on on their vision, I like people who are direct, I use bing every day and their image generation and ai ChatGPT is good for generating ideas for drawings.
As an ML engineer this talk speaks to me
If this is the silhouette that a tech/web life produces then I am v glad i lead my mostly non involved life ...
Exciting
I can picture a future world where
If he's not confirming the leaks about Microsoft silicon, then why mention them at that point? That would make no sense. So yes, he's confirming those leaks.
Quite a learning :)
Market places to be fair? You mean how Windows 11 fights tooth and nail to trick and force you into using Edge/Bing at every corner? How Windows makes it extremely hard to change the default browser and makes it literally impossible to set non-Edge for certain user journeys? How Microsoft literally INJECTS a banner into the Chrome download page and also has a pop up blocking the download button? Are these "fair" strategies?
So much of this "AI" stuff is creating barriers more than anything. I can search for something manually on Bing in a fraction of the time, and I don't need to rehash the data to ensure it's being properly compiled and coming from reliable sources.
This also represents a massive dumbing down of users. We already have serious issues with misinformation and people not knowing how to spot unreliable sources. This compounds those issues.
So many other issues with how this is being pushed, but those ought to be enough to cause pause.
Most of these are just simple automations lol far from AI. It's a buzz word today.
@@bassyey it is in fact AI, many of you people think AI is like in the movies, no it isn't and likely never will be.
If people get all the value they need from a summarized version of your content, then your content was too long and bloated to begin with. Is that simple.
I get your point, but I think you're wrong, at least partially.
Even if the content is high quality, well summarized and not too long, the search engine can still present it to you and the website doesn't get traffic.
@@KarlDag That's to a large extent already true. E.g. Google's answers pulled from the web. Unless it's something very simple, a snippet of the content isn't going to provide the same value as reading the whole thing, and if it does (or it's very close), then the original piece was bloated or very simple to begin with.
@@augustofretes yes, it wont provide equal value, but it doesn't need to provide the same value, it just needs to pretend it is the same value even when the AI is completely wrong.