A person goes through vetting to be accepted by the party before submitting your documents to the EC, at the vetting you're supposed to be a member of that party for a period before allowed to run on the ticket of the party, again if you hold allegiance to any other party, so, when did he denounced his first party to now be on the polling pool of the next parliament ????
The NPP must be commended for showing wisdom while the NDC must be shamed for not taking such actions in the past. Law is not for the talkative but doer. Mr. Blay is just repeating what the SC said which must be abided by the speaker, your Lion cannot do anything about it. He can petition the SC if he is indeed a Lion
please if you are hosting Lawyer Tsatsu , host him togther with someone who is also as good as him , please we need that critical thinking education here
I think you lack understanding too. An intention to do something in the future cannot be punished now as per the judgement of the SC. Politics is making all NDC lawyers not accept the fact Mr. Blay is saying. The Supreme Court is the only body which can interpret Laws in Ghana and they did exactly that. If the affected MPs are accepted back, it means what the lawyers speaking for the SC judgement is true
So you are saying that they can still represent their party till election, ryt. Even so they can go for meetings and take decision on behalf of the party until election. Is that what you are saying. In case your wife or girlfriend decide to divorce or leave you, you will still allow her to stay in your house and go sleep with her new husband to be or boyfriend. Even so you will allow her to cook for you, right. an@@KofiPrince-n9b
Npp do understands that what they are doing is wrong but they are using patapaa to defend wrongly. There's no interpretation in this matter it's clear for even jss students to understand.
I think you lack understanding too. An intention to do something in the future cannot be punished now as per the judgement of the SC. Politics is making all NDC lawyers not accept the fact Mr. Blay is saying. The Supreme Court is the only body which can interpret Laws in Ghana and they did exactly that. If the affected MPs are accepted back, it means what the lawyers speaking for the SC judgement is true
@@KofiPrince-n9b So this is your understanding ? when an Mp betrays his party that Mp should be punished in the next Parliament and not the current parliament. Is the person part of the current parliament or future Parliament? make it make sense
You're the one who lacks understanding and why bcz it's intentional bcz even the Constitution speaks of the future intentions which starts from the present and even every political party's constitution speaks about that and we all know that, which speaks of automatic forfeiture of their seat@@KofiPrince-n9b
I think you want to say the SC has confused you. But you will still have to obey the ruling. He is just repeating the ruling which Tsatsu will abide by as a Ghanaian
We are wasting our taxpayer's money on people like Freddie Blay. Look at the people leading us? Tsatsu shouldn't accept this kind of invitation to meet with Freddie Blay type
All of the sensible ones are running away, Only Blay wants to play the devil's advocate. There are some of them who are ready to throw their integrities to the dogs. There was one Tabitha on Metro TV yesterday flopping and shouting.😂🤣🤣
Am really amazed by your comment. Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem? What different thing is Mr. Blay saying that the SC didn't? Tsatsu is rather fighting a lost battle
Mr. Blay you shouldn't have accepted the invitation to come on the program or you forgot that Mr. Tsatsu is there? Henceforth, they NOT bring someone like Mr. Blay to face the legal legend.
Mr Blay was making a bogus argument, before anything else Asiamah was sacked from the party because of his decision to go independent, subsequently he was readmitted into the party which qualified him to contest in the party’s primaries, while filling his nomination forms to contest in the primaries he needed party members in the constituency to endorse his candidature and not just anyone dwelling in the constituency. By going through that process means he’s no longer an independent elected mp but a card bearing member of the NPP. This is a bad precedent being set and this will haunt the political parties going forward.
It will not hurt them. The NPP is an intelligent party. They are also a serious party . Future intention cannot be interpreted as an action now. The SC gave precedents
@ so they thought when they took those actions not long ago in 2020, not long after that they wanted to axe Adwoa Safo from parliament because she wasn’t helping their course which motion is still pending in parliament. That attempt foiled because it wasn’t an NPP speaker in the seat. Posterity isn’t far and their so called intelligence as they claim to will be folly in no distance future.
Tsatsu is confused and biased. For the fact that someone has made a decision doesn't necessarily affect the current parliament. this is common sense, that decision will affect the next parliament. it was intensions, not factual.
Mr Tsatsu is beautifully smiling 😃 😊
A person goes through vetting to be accepted by the party before submitting your documents to the EC, at the vetting you're supposed to be a member of that party for a period before allowed to run on the ticket of the party, again if you hold allegiance to any other party, so, when did he denounced his first party to now be on the polling pool of the next parliament ????
Mr Blay you go explain tyre 😂😂😂
Putting this chipmunk 🐿️before the Lion clearly shows that “we have the men” is just rhetoric
Very apt description of criminal blay😂😂😂😂 a chipmunk indeed
The NPP must be commended for showing wisdom while the NDC must be shamed for not taking such actions in the past. Law is not for the talkative but doer. Mr. Blay is just repeating what the SC said which must be abided by the speaker, your Lion cannot do anything about it. He can petition the SC if he is indeed a Lion
Why do you pair Tsatsu with Blay?? TV3 never repeat this NONSENSE AGAIN!!
Tsatsu is a humble man to debate such character
please if you are hosting Lawyer Tsatsu , host him togther with someone who is also as good as him , please we need that critical thinking education here
I think you lack understanding too. An intention to do something in the future cannot be punished now as per the judgement of the SC. Politics is making all NDC lawyers not accept the fact Mr. Blay is saying. The Supreme Court is the only body which can interpret Laws in Ghana and they did exactly that. If the affected MPs are accepted back, it means what the lawyers speaking for the SC judgement is true
@@KofiPrince-n9bYour logical reasoning is so low.
So you are saying that they can still represent their party till election, ryt. Even so they can go for meetings and take decision on behalf of the party until election. Is that what you are saying. In case your wife or girlfriend decide to divorce or leave you, you will still allow her to stay in your house and go sleep with her new husband to be or boyfriend. Even so you will allow her to cook for you, right. an@@KofiPrince-n9b
Kofi we are discussing law not morality . It’s what the constitution is saying not what we think should be
Npp do understands that what they are doing is wrong but they are using patapaa to defend wrongly. There's no interpretation in this matter it's clear for even jss students to understand.
Really? Is the SC wrong? Don't write from emotions, Law is not about emotional but intelligence
How then did the NPP got the majority? Because the independent MP could not have changed his party.
Please those who understood what Mr Blay said should explain what he said to me wai 😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I think you lack understanding too. An intention to do something in the future cannot be punished now as per the judgement of the SC. Politics is making all NDC lawyers not accept the fact Mr. Blay is saying. The Supreme Court is the only body which can interpret Laws in Ghana and they did exactly that. If the affected MPs are accepted back, it means what the lawyers speaking for the SC judgement is true
@@KofiPrince-n9b
So this is your understanding ?
when an Mp betrays his party that Mp should be punished in the next Parliament and not the current parliament. Is the person part of the current parliament or future Parliament? make it make sense
You're the one who lacks understanding and why bcz it's intentional bcz even the Constitution speaks of the future intentions which starts from the present and even every political party's constitution speaks about that and we all know that, which speaks of automatic forfeiture of their seat@@KofiPrince-n9b
Blaylock is talking foolishness
Not true
Defending the indefensible can make you look stupid irrespective of your status, age and many others.
Beatrice you did well today
Lawyer Blay is confusing me here
Not only you. He's confused himself.
I think you want to say the SC has confused you. But you will still have to obey the ruling. He is just repeating the ruling which Tsatsu will abide by as a Ghanaian
Mr blay why did you come on this show … next time don’t accept such invitation with Professor Tsatsu 😂😂😂
What is Tsatsu saying which holds, nothing. He rather shouldn't have come
Wrong environment for Tsatsu, From the host to the co-panelist.
He is not being honest that is why the environment is wrong for him
We are wasting our taxpayer's money on people like Freddie Blay. Look at the people leading us? Tsatsu shouldn't accept this kind of invitation to meet with Freddie Blay type
3News you've really disappointed us for not giving good pairing. Would have been better with a seasoned lawyer and Mr Tsatsu on the show.
All of the sensible ones are running away, Only Blay wants to play the devil's advocate. There are some of them who are ready to throw their integrities to the dogs. There was one Tabitha on Metro TV yesterday flopping and shouting.😂🤣🤣
Am really amazed by your comment. Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem? What different thing is Mr. Blay saying that the SC didn't? Tsatsu is rather fighting a lost battle
The host is one of the most useless at TV3. She does not understand anything but keep throwing out word salads.
Very true.
Mr. Blay, what are you saying?
Mr. Blay you shouldn't have accepted the invitation to come on the program or you forgot that Mr. Tsatsu is there?
Henceforth, they NOT bring someone like Mr. Blay to face the legal legend.
What is it that Mr Tsatsu said that will change the SC ruling or deny the affected MPs their seat back? Such an argument will be deemed good
TV3 de3 the least said abt them the better! You bring an d politician to face an astute lawyer to debate the Law ???!😂😂😂😂
They should have matched Attorney General with Tsatsu or Tsatsu with young lawyer Kweku Paintsil
NPP is a John party
Chairman Wontumi would have been better😂😂 Upon NPP's we have the men, I've never seen any of their best yet oo.
how did Freddie Blay get to be a lawyer. Even the English is not englishing😂
Oh stop
What at all is Blay saying, make reasonable comment not unreasonableness.
Really? What different thing is he saying that the SC didn't?
Mr Blay was making a bogus argument, before anything else Asiamah was sacked from the party because of his decision to go independent, subsequently he was readmitted into the party which qualified him to contest in the party’s primaries, while filling his nomination forms to contest in the primaries he needed party members in the constituency to endorse his candidature and not just anyone dwelling in the constituency. By going through that process means he’s no longer an independent elected mp but a card bearing member of the NPP. This is a bad precedent being set and this will haunt the political parties going forward.
It will not hurt them. The NPP is an intelligent party. They are also a serious party . Future intention cannot be interpreted as an action now. The SC gave precedents
@ so they thought when they took those actions not long ago in 2020, not long after that they wanted to axe Adwoa Safo from parliament because she wasn’t helping their course which motion is still pending in parliament. That attempt foiled because it wasn’t an NPP speaker in the seat. Posterity isn’t far and their so called intelligence as they claim to will be folly in no distance future.
I see many people commenting about the pairing of these two gentlemen. I think people are scared for Mr. Blay.
😂😂😂wei
You must be an idiot to think that way
Nooo, he is just repeating what the SC said which Mr Tsatsu will abide by even with his lengthy comments
What is he saying 😢
It’s poor pairing of guests. It is an insult to put Blay on a panel to argue law with Tsatsu
If its affected npp, they will use all dubious means to defend and be coating articles upon articles.
Freddie Blau is gitering
Who understands what Mr Blay is saying???? A load of hot air if you ask me!!!
😂😂😂😂
@dennisbrown7930 , you may need wontumi to do this interpretation for you😂😂
@@thomassankara2857 😄
I dnt understand himm ooo
what language is Blay speaking
How on earth do you upgrade this Blay by inviting him in the presence of Tsatsu Tsikata
The host should do better next time.
Tsatsu couldn't help the NDC in their election petition, what are you saying
Is the lady confused? Why would she say mr Tsikata ask tsatsu 😂 how
Hmmm, we have the men, ampa!
Please is Blay a lawyer?
Freddie Blay is a lawyer ?
This is mismatch..Mr Tsatsu is a best teacher
Really? Are his statements going to change the ruling? If not then he isn't a good teacher
Really? Are his statements going to change the ruling? If not then he isn't a good teacher
Dishonest Old Freddy Blay
Chipmunk blay 😂😂😂😂
All the stolen money and yet he looks very ill
😂😂😂
Bloody criminal blay senseless talking
Yeah he looks unwell.
My senior colleague Tastsu is talking as a first year law student in trying to defend the speaker. I’m surprised he put the facts away and do politics
Tsatsu is confused and biased. For the fact that someone has made a decision doesn't necessarily affect the current parliament. this is common sense, that decision will affect the next parliament. it was intensions, not factual.
😂😂😂😂 you are a joke just like blay who is not making sense in the studio
Instead of learning, you are talking about bias. Of the two who is biased? Did Asiamah become a member of the NPP before filing for the nomination?