Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 Review Vs Sony 16-35 and Tamron 17-28

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 июл 2024
  • Ultra-Wide zoom lens shootout. We reviewed the Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN in and around Cape Town to see how it stacks up against the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8.
    Sigma 16-28mm: www.ormsdirect.co.za/sigma-16...
    BUY PHOTOGRAPHIC GEAR
    Orms Direct: www.ormsdirect.co.za
    BE CREATIVELY ENRICHED
    Orms Connect - The Orms Blog: bit.ly/2Fsu2ro
    FOLLOW ORMS
    Instagram: / ormsdirect
    Facebook: / ormsdirect
    Twitter: / ormsdirect
    We use Artlist for all our music licensing: artlist.io/
    ABOUT ORMSTV
    OrmsTV is one of the leading photo- and videographic RUclips channels in South Africa. We create videos about the latest cameras, news and rumours roundups for the avid gearhead community and rich educational content where we share the knowledge of local industry experts. Familiar faces you may recognise include Deon, our veteran host and resident Fujifilm fanboy; Andre, one of our sales reps and amazing gear expert; and Matt, our Video Content Manager who occasionally steps out from behind the camera to contribute to our community.
    00:00 Intro
    00:24 Specifications
    01:24 The Shoot
    02:00 Portraits
    03:45 Close Ups
    04:47 Colour Reproduction
    06:17 Lens Coatings
    08:38 Distortion
    10:03 Focus Breathing
    11:10 Autofocus Performance
    11:30 Conclusion
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 14

  • @tourinojacks5844
    @tourinojacks5844 4 месяца назад +1

    Thank you for this review. I think you guys did a fabulous job! Liked and subbed!

  • @GMS444
    @GMS444 8 месяцев назад

    Great job guys

  • @husseinaliabdulzahraal-dul1575

    some tests online showed sigma having slow video autofocus. do you thinka tamron 17-28mm is better?

  • @roadtobeingapro
    @roadtobeingapro Год назад

    there is an update for this lens, ver.02 released last november 2022, was it able to fix the autofocus (hunting) problem? thank you!

  • @boristahmasian9604
    @boristahmasian9604 Год назад +3

    Great review. First time visitor to your YT channel. I own the Tamron 17-28 and find your results similar to mine. Sigma was not available when I bought the Tamron and the Sony was outside of my budget range. The questions is should I let the Tamron go in favor of the Sigma? I shoot the Tamron at f8 to f11 a lot so I am not sure if I can see noticeable difference between the two. You guys have experienced both. What is your take? I am also considering possibly to let the 17-28 go in favor of the newly released 20-40.

  • @andrewkim1247
    @andrewkim1247 Год назад +13

    The real question, sigma 16-28 vs sony 16-35 G PZ

    • @gameonly1549
      @gameonly1549 Год назад +1

      Same question please help which one ?

    • @gboyer78
      @gboyer78 Год назад

      @@gameonly1549yes which one?

    • @jaybirdhansome7482
      @jaybirdhansome7482 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@gameonly1549 Sigma all the way. Would any day all day prefer F2.8 over f4.

  • @ManuelPestana
    @ManuelPestana Год назад +3

    Sigma all the way....love the built, quality

  • @razafiarisonmichael4421
    @razafiarisonmichael4421 Год назад

    4:26 is it sigma or is it you ? I'm not sure if I should get this lens because of this review

  • @alvinbartolome1239
    @alvinbartolome1239 6 месяцев назад

    Hoe about focus breathing?

  • @blackfish73
    @blackfish73 Год назад +2

    This video confirms for me that the Tamron is the best value for money of the three.

    • @g-lurk
      @g-lurk 11 месяцев назад +4

      as i'm looking now the sigma is only $90 USD more. i thought for sure the sigma was the way to go!