If article 25 is a constitutional right and if constitutional right are enforced in the court under article 32, then court has a constitutional duty to decide on religious matters. Anyone who has no knowledge of constitution or law or logic can say otherwise. Period The intention behind article 25 is that all religion that existedin india should exist in india peacefully and that in turn will increase our understanding of those religions. I slso agree with this intention of our founding fathers and do not accept stupid sanghi bakwas
So sad and unfortunate to find religion to get such priority in 2024! When can human become rational like any another animal? Religion is just other side of education. Doesn't everyone read about evolution in school textbook? Why being rational is so rare and similar to solar eclipse? Is being rational so difficult because of religion's influence from childhood? Reform is required to simplify everything. Even though religion is absolutely not required, still if human remain weak minded and can't avoid religion's influence and become religious, respecting every religion is required for/in a secular country. As there is no existing process to check accountability of courts (judges, advocates), performance of all lower courts is questionable. As number of pending cases are so huge, we shall concentrate how to reduce the differences amongst human as much as possible rather than increasing if we think ourselves as civilized, modern. Who can tell that tomorrow there will not be demand from parent religion, say hindu- they need different law for different devotees based on the hindu god A/B/C he/she worships. People may find that a Judge cum devotee of A favours devotee of god A while remains unfair for devotee of god B. Every religion has few subcategories or child religions.
Religions are also rational. That's a very superficial understanding that religions are somehow opposed to rationality. Yes, religions do not work only within the domain of material plane, as they also deliberate upon the laws of the spiritual plane - which can only be experienced and not objectified the way material principles can be - so the uninitiated may innocently view religions as irrational merely because they go beyond material plane.
@@AshwiniSharma Your justification is very similar to any priest who advises to any devotee that if you pray or worship god in true faith or sense, god will definitely listen your wish. As a devotee can never prove his/her degree/density of faith or truth during prayer or worshipping, authenticity of god's blessing can never be questioned! An astrologer comes with similar justification. Perhaps the definition of 'rationality' is different for you. I have already explained earlier what religion is all about in reality. Not to worry, like you, my all-family members are very religious (though having less human value than me) and god fearing!
@@subhendugiri5018 - Spirituality is not same as worshipping. You can be an atheist or agnostic while still being spiritual. Spirituality is knowing that you are a ball of energy controlling your body. So your entire argument stands on the ground that spirituality is same as worshipping, which is untrue, and therefore invalid. Why is it untrue? Because you don't need to worship or be a theist to be spiritual. P.S - I understand why you may want to use the word 'worshipping' while I say 'spirituality'. That's because I used the term, 'religion'. However, in Hinduism, 'dharma' essentially boils down to 'sustainable conduct', and is incorrectly translated into religion. For figuring out sustainable conduct, you don't need to worship anyone.
@@AshwiniSharma I appreciate your response. This video content was in the context of 'religious matters'. My comment was based on my day-to-day experience with religious practices from so-called religious people (in my home, neighbors, news about incidents from own state or other states or even other countries), so it was based on evidence or facts. It was not about what I do or how I do, but how others do or what others do. Being a rational, all these religious stuffs are irrelevant to me. Now when you attempt to conclude 'dharma' is not religion, it raises plenty of new questions than answering for the existing ones. You have brought up another context, 'spirituality'. As I google for meaning of 'spirituality', I get this- 'the quality of being concerned with the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things'. Being all time student of science, 'spirit or soul' is irrelevant like religion or dharma. Bottomline, as a rational I would go always for facts and evidence unlike your approach, hence I don't think we should continue this conversation. I still thank you for all of your responses. It was nice conversation.
![Quando Rondo - Life Goes On [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eIf3fhMXAow/mqdefault.jpg)
Secular India should have no religion based law, just the freedom of religion.
If article 25 is a constitutional right and if constitutional right are enforced in the court under article 32, then court has a constitutional duty to decide on religious matters.
Anyone who has no knowledge of constitution or law or logic can say otherwise. Period
The intention behind article 25 is that all religion that existedin india should exist in india peacefully and that in turn will increase our understanding of those religions.
I slso agree with this intention of our founding fathers and do not accept stupid sanghi bakwas
So sad and unfortunate to find religion to get such priority in 2024! When can human become rational like any another animal? Religion is just other side of education. Doesn't everyone read about evolution in school textbook? Why being rational is so rare and similar to solar eclipse? Is being rational so difficult because of religion's influence from childhood? Reform is required to simplify everything. Even though religion is absolutely not required, still if human remain weak minded and can't avoid religion's influence and become religious, respecting every religion is required for/in a secular country. As there is no existing process to check accountability of courts (judges, advocates), performance of all lower courts is questionable. As number of pending cases are so huge, we shall concentrate how to reduce the differences amongst human as much as possible rather than increasing if we think ourselves as civilized, modern. Who can tell that tomorrow there will not be demand from parent religion, say hindu- they need different law for different devotees based on the hindu god A/B/C he/she worships. People may find that a Judge cum devotee of A favours devotee of god A while remains unfair for devotee of god B. Every religion has few subcategories or child religions.
Religions are also rational. That's a very superficial understanding that religions are somehow opposed to rationality. Yes, religions do not work only within the domain of material plane, as they also deliberate upon the laws of the spiritual plane - which can only be experienced and not objectified the way material principles can be - so the uninitiated may innocently view religions as irrational merely because they go beyond material plane.
@@AshwiniSharma Your justification is very similar to any priest who advises to any devotee that if you pray or worship god in true faith or sense, god will definitely listen your wish. As a devotee can never prove his/her degree/density of faith or truth during prayer or worshipping, authenticity of god's blessing can never be questioned! An astrologer comes with similar justification. Perhaps the definition of 'rationality' is different for you. I have already explained earlier what religion is all about in reality. Not to worry, like you, my all-family members are very religious (though having less human value than me) and god fearing!
@@subhendugiri5018 - Spirituality is not same as worshipping. You can be an atheist or agnostic while still being spiritual. Spirituality is knowing that you are a ball of energy controlling your body. So your entire argument stands on the ground that spirituality is same as worshipping, which is untrue, and therefore invalid. Why is it untrue? Because you don't need to worship or be a theist to be spiritual.
P.S - I understand why you may want to use the word 'worshipping' while I say 'spirituality'. That's because I used the term, 'religion'. However, in Hinduism, 'dharma' essentially boils down to 'sustainable conduct', and is incorrectly translated into religion. For figuring out sustainable conduct, you don't need to worship anyone.
@@AshwiniSharma I appreciate your response. This video content was in the context of 'religious matters'. My comment was based on my day-to-day experience with religious practices from so-called religious people (in my home, neighbors, news about incidents from own state or other states or even other countries), so it was based on evidence or facts. It was not about what I do or how I do, but how others do or what others do. Being a rational, all these religious stuffs are irrelevant to me.
Now when you attempt to conclude 'dharma' is not religion, it raises plenty of new questions than answering for the existing ones.
You have brought up another context, 'spirituality'. As I google for meaning of 'spirituality', I get this- 'the quality of being concerned with the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things'. Being all time student of science, 'spirit or soul' is irrelevant like religion or dharma.
Bottomline, as a rational I would go always for facts and evidence unlike your approach, hence I don't think we should continue this conversation. I still thank you for all of your responses. It was nice conversation.