I use your website daily as a PC builder, so much so, it often tells me too many requests. Thank you for all the data, and hopefully this channel grows.
in my playthrough fsr uglier in still image but in motion fsr is a easy win than xess, and in the first cafe when you try to obtain the coin, the sunlight from the outside are flickering when you use xess, but if you're using fsr it's normal, honestly i don't care about the quality of the graphic anymore, i use fsr for the frame generation, still stuttery as hell but it's better than before
A qualitative comment on such comparisons by the author is needed, because the poor youtube compression does not allow the viewer to actually see any not totally obvious differences, e.g. heavy ghosting, by himself.
Tbose screenshots are still taken in stills. So we have never trully seen the differences. It makes dlss ultra performajce look 96% the same as dlss quality which obviously can't be. I hope the author can consoder doing screenshots at atleast 120 pixels movement per second.@@TechPowerUp
You cannot see it because of RUclips and compression. You can see it when you do it for yourself and pay attention to it. But basically, if your GPU supports dlss use that, if not use FSR 3. For the rest of the settings, shadow quality is a big one, so try them all to see which settings gives you the most performance.
I use your website daily as a PC builder, so much so, it often tells me too many requests. Thank you for all the data, and hopefully this channel grows.
in my playthrough fsr uglier in still image but in motion fsr is a easy win than xess, and in the first cafe when you try to obtain the coin, the sunlight from the outside are flickering when you use xess, but if you're using fsr it's normal, honestly i don't care about the quality of the graphic anymore, i use fsr for the frame generation, still stuttery as hell but it's better than before
I tried to see a difference with magnifying glass, but no luck.
🧐🤷♂️
A qualitative comment on such comparisons by the author is needed, because the poor youtube compression does not allow the viewer to actually see any not totally obvious differences, e.g. heavy ghosting, by himself.
Link in the description with the full written article. Also has screenshots to highlight the differences.
Tbose screenshots are still taken in stills. So we have never trully seen the differences. It makes dlss ultra performajce look 96% the same as dlss quality which obviously can't be.
I hope the author can consoder doing screenshots at atleast 120 pixels movement per second.@@TechPowerUp
Didnt see any difference between all of them.
So you are clearly blind or AMDesperation fanboy. FSR frame is really a mess
you can not see because it is made to not be seeable and its great.
You cannot see it because of RUclips and compression. You can see it when you do it for yourself and pay attention to it. But basically, if your GPU supports dlss use that, if not use FSR 3. For the rest of the settings, shadow quality is a big one, so try them all to see which settings gives you the most performance.
@pioterer79 get a good pair of glasses then and you still watching on youtube, don't forget this
@@OmnianMIU The difference , if is any, is so small that is not worth to pay for overpriced „Green” GPU. And my eyesight is still sharp.
stutters no matter what