Gender-Affirming Care in the Court’s Crosshairs

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 янв 2025

Комментарии • 95

  • @byteframe_primarydataloop
    @byteframe_primarydataloop Месяц назад +2

    Ostensibly is my favorite word.

  • @rossmann611
    @rossmann611 Месяц назад +11

    i was just listening to your compatriots, sisters in law, among others expounding on what is likely in store as the landscape of our society undergoes radical revision. unbound by norms, laws, accountability and certainly not any internal moral compass; self-consciousness, shame, responsibility nor even an ability to foresee consequences. i despair. but i am truly grateful that despite no doubt busy lives, careers, and legitimate concern for your personal security, you guys continue to produce these enlightening, informative and humorous episodes...thank you

  • @justascomplicated8182
    @justascomplicated8182 Месяц назад +6

    Mitch McConnell accusing others of undermining the judiciary is hilarious

  • @ashlikefrompokemon4327
    @ashlikefrompokemon4327 Месяц назад +7

    this SCOTUS case makes me v nervous 🙃🙃🙃 I'm a gay trans man myself and I work as a therapist for primarily queer and trans youth; and I'm worried for my own healthcare, the healthcare of the kids I work with, and my ability to even do my job helping these kids. I just don't see it ending well, and I fear that any decision that hurts the trans community will further empower legislative or executive action to continue targeting the trans community 🙃🙃🙃

    • @RC-qf3mp
      @RC-qf3mp Месяц назад

      Nobody is being ‘targeted’. It’s about protecting children from medical experimentation and highly dubious ‘science’ in an area where minors can’t reasonably have informed consent. Destransitioners matter. Funny how the liberal media ignores them. Almost like they are in denial that detransitioners exist, because it undermines the very idea of a fixed gender identity. And if it’s not fixed, it’s not a meaningful class worthy under the 14th Amendment, as was argued in court. Strangio could not deny the basic logic that transgender identities are not necessarily fixed. Refuted.

  • @bevejohnson4917
    @bevejohnson4917 Месяц назад +6

    You ladies are awesome, thank you for your time, knowledge, education and truth 💙💙💙

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      Right? It's great that they will support males lactating and breast feeding babies. We don't want sex based rights or discrimination, and we want males in all our female spaces to feel comfortable. We welcome them. We are kind, and we know they really are women. La Leche will be in court soon. Males have a right to join support group for breastfeeding mothers, and a right to have babies suckle their nipples. It is a great pleasure, and gender affirming, and we cannot deny them this euphoric experience.

  • @45lild18
    @45lild18 Месяц назад +4

    Vladek is an intellectual powerhouse and national treasure. I learn so much from him, and from you. Thank you all.

  • @jbrudert
    @jbrudert Месяц назад +13

    Ah the Federalist Society ... making it extremely easy for the contrarian mediocre law student to become embedded in the Judiciary since 1982.

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      Yes, it is appalling that they are not anti-natalist, and we want them to call us "birthers" and "people with a uterus."

  • @JJ-fq3vy
    @JJ-fq3vy Месяц назад +2

    RIP FRED 😭

  • @sagasandstars
    @sagasandstars Месяц назад +3

    Are they all high in the Federalist society? Jeeze…

  • @patrick.gilmore
    @patrick.gilmore Месяц назад +4

    Leah: Lots of us do not drink coffee but would "mainline" sugar. Glad to see you are in the club. 😘

  • @SamSullyV
    @SamSullyV Месяц назад +2

    Im with the right on Peanut the Squirrel

  • @AllOutBible
    @AllOutBible Месяц назад +1

    Ahh. Like the early equal marriage decisions that claimed gay people weren't being discriminated against. Because everyone has the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. 🙄

  • @MaShcode
    @MaShcode Месяц назад +1

    Oh what a missed opportunity for Judge Vladek to play Billy Paul singing Me and Mrs Jones. Not only would it mess with copyright playback but also slaps some levity on yet more eye-rolling discourse from the radical right.
    We got a thang goin on…😂

  • @vkpsych
    @vkpsych Месяц назад +1

    I am with you Leah on the sugar!

  • @marktauber7355
    @marktauber7355 Месяц назад

    Thank you for referring to Alexis Carrington Colby. The actress portraying Alexis perfectly inhabited both Lady Macbeth and a hilarious, campy send-up of the same character.😂

  • @PrinceNewYorkliberty
    @PrinceNewYorkliberty Месяц назад +6

    We all should transition and have transsexual kids and and marry only with an transexual partner or same sex partner. And definitely not ban this gender affirming care they are protected in the constitution and in New York

  • @leo.privacy
    @leo.privacy Месяц назад

    Leah needs to try Duplin muscadine wine. 😂

  • @sylvanwoods5271
    @sylvanwoods5271 Месяц назад

    There was an irony in watching them consume a beverage in celebration of the weakening of regulatory agencies, some of which regulate beverages similar to the very thing they were consuming.

  • @patrick.gilmore
    @patrick.gilmore Месяц назад +6

    You question how SCOTUS can use logic to uphold a law against gender affirming care, when that logic was used to invalidate Loving v. Virginia. What makes you think they do not want to invalidate Loving?

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      We have sex segregation right now, in sports, locker rooms, and other female only spaces. Why allow males in female only spaces?

  • @martinheidegger517
    @martinheidegger517 Месяц назад

    'bed socks senior members'😄

  • @susananery4260
    @susananery4260 Месяц назад

    I love that show! Ladies you are awesome!!! It feel like I’m in Dejavu from Brazil - where I used to be a lawyer . I’m sad to see all of this here and around the world, actually.
    Btw, Melissa, I love your room decor 😍

  • @neilchace1858
    @neilchace1858 Месяц назад +1

    On the Skrmetti case, could the precedent in Bostock apply here?

    • @RC-qf3mp
      @RC-qf3mp Месяц назад

      No, b/c Bostock is Title VII for employment, Skrmetti is 14th Amendment. Different language, different law, different policy purpose/context. They COULD use the same reasoning as Bostock, but Bostock isn’t an applicable ‘precedent’.

  • @Tanktaco
    @Tanktaco Месяц назад

    Unfortunately sugar can be much more harmful than caffeine and its benefits.

  • @MarciaMatthews
    @MarciaMatthews Месяц назад +3

    In April 2024 the four-year, NHS England-commissioned review of pediatric gender medicine was submitted by Dr. Hilary Cass. The Cass Review has been fully accepted by the NHS, supported by the U.K. major political parties, and broadly embraced by the U.K. clinical community. As a result, the TAVISTOCK gender clinic was closed down.

    • @kennethhymes9734
      @kennethhymes9734 Месяц назад

      And it is thoroughly fraudulent. Cherry picked data, absurd and laughable study design, many examples of direct lying in the report itself. The transphobes have no morals.

    • @RC-qf3mp
      @RC-qf3mp Месяц назад +1

      Shhhh… this is a fact-free zone. Only choir-preaching allowed here.

  • @marc21256
    @marc21256 Месяц назад

    These laws are clearly discriminatory. They simply don't care.

  • @rychei5393
    @rychei5393 Месяц назад +1

    Bob Ross would be very sad about the squirrel.
    Not Sex discrimination? Fine--- Biological discrimination!

  • @Fabdanc
    @Fabdanc Месяц назад +1

    Dear Strict Scrutiny and Strict Scrutiny Listeners... a question that has always been on my mind: how does one become a legal scholar / top legal mind in a particular area of law? I have always just been curious on what criteria, loose or well defined, it gets based off of.

    • @JayHann
      @JayHann Месяц назад +1

      By publishing articles and other scholarly works with law journals and other reputable publishers of legal literary works. This requires detailed legal research as such publications usually have high standards of articles being well sourced. ChatGPT will not cut it.

    • @RC-qf3mp
      @RC-qf3mp Месяц назад

      You can either go the normal route of being at a top law school and get in good with the woke DEI liberal professors. It helps to be gay, trans, a woman or a minority. OR, if you’re just a boring cis hetero white man, then you can join the Federalist Society. Helps if you like beer and guns. Either way, ‘legal scholars’ are pretty pathetic lot and largely irrelevant. People with the real brains go into private practice to make the big bucks, or the judiciary, or DOJ. If you earn your credentials by actually working, then you can be a talking head if you toe the line of whatever ideological bent you surround yourself by. Again, pretty pathetic. A ‘legal scholar’ is nothing a decent person would aspire to.

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver Месяц назад

    Omfg please explain 47:43 much slower if you have time in another episode lol no matter how many times I try to listen through this I can't seem to follow all the threads.
    The USA vs Miller sovreingty bankruptcy case too, same issue. 😅 Would love elaboration

  • @dixiekushman8609
    @dixiekushman8609 Месяц назад

    Peanut and Fred.....(SC is falling off the bridge)

  • @obibon4548
    @obibon4548 Месяц назад +1

    help!

  • @helenhunter4540
    @helenhunter4540 Месяц назад +1

    As an 80 year old, I recognized only the mitt romney reference. Please stick to the "meat" of your topic (I'm also vegan).

  • @vincentgaines1268
    @vincentgaines1268 Месяц назад

    I love this , though the courts are depressing me with their deviant behaviour , you guys made me laugh about it.

  • @NotSoCivilEngineer
    @NotSoCivilEngineer Месяц назад

    38:40 “They would be reviving a previously rejected precedent”
    SCOTUS conservative justices: Did someone say there existed a precedent?!?

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      I know right, like the precedent of "A Woman is an Adult Human Female." That is so passe!

  • @dallasmiddleton7694
    @dallasmiddleton7694 Месяц назад

    "I am familiar with Drake"

  • @samanthamarie6474
    @samanthamarie6474 Месяц назад

    The only reason they euthanized the squirrel was because it bit someone, and they needed to check if the squirrel had rabies.If the owner of the squirrel had registered it and made sure it was updated on it's vaccinations then they wouldn't have had to euthanize it. But the only way to check for rabies is taking out it's brain and checking. As a lover a squirrels I still wouldn't want to mess with rabies. They can stay outside.Or if injured taken to a wildlife rehabilitation center.

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      We have more regulations for squirrels than we do for gender affirming care.

  • @BellePal
    @BellePal Месяц назад +1

    If i didn’t have flavored vapes, I would still be smoking.

  • @dixiekushman8609
    @dixiekushman8609 Месяц назад

    Wasn't she already investigated for bias and misconduct? (1913)

  • @kathywiseman7944
    @kathywiseman7944 Месяц назад

    😢😢

  • @georgehanson6159
    @georgehanson6159 Месяц назад

    I really thought these ladies were part of the gilded elite until the wine discussion.

    • @Lacey13-i3b
      @Lacey13-i3b Месяц назад

      The whine discussion should have given you a clue!

  • @elysse3653
    @elysse3653 Месяц назад

    I’ve been thinking about how not legally-logical the decisions of the current Court have been. I was trying to explain why certain arguments don’t make sense, and shared this video with my teen. What if we framed more of our criticisms of these decisions based on calling out good old-fashioned logical fallacies?
    ruclips.net/video/pCg-SNOteQQ/видео.html

  • @ShilohDeOro
    @ShilohDeOro Месяц назад

    please please please

  • @Preciouspink
    @Preciouspink Месяц назад

    Why are hierarchies pro natalist? Answer further the hierarchy and inequality

  • @steveporter6789
    @steveporter6789 Месяц назад

    Judge Jones is not too young to rremember.

  • @unstillborn
    @unstillborn Месяц назад

    40:07 Puppy!

  • @utopio_ai
    @utopio_ai Месяц назад

    help me!

  • @ShilohDeOro
    @ShilohDeOro Месяц назад

    i need your help

  • @joepaquet4332
    @joepaquet4332 Месяц назад +1

    12/4/24 Prelogar proves beyond a reasonable doubt that SHE is a liar.

  • @ShilohDeOro
    @ShilohDeOro Месяц назад

    please help me

  • @ShilohDeOro
    @ShilohDeOro Месяц назад

    help me

  • @melanielane
    @melanielane Месяц назад +3

    I really wish you guys wouldn’t laugh about the squirrel being killed. It’s a terrible story and like the old saying even a broken clock is right twice a day,
    MAGA can be too. They have so little empathy, laughing at one of the few times they do is simply not helpful.
    The story of the squirrel is heart breaking. The guy had filed the paper work to be allowed to have them as pets, someone online filed a complaint and they were taken. The guy told the authorities he was in the process of the licensing and they told him to call and work it out but they had to do their job. They were then immediately euthanized. The guy is broken. This is a sad story. Laughing at maga for the hell of it is not always required

    • @jasonnugent963
      @jasonnugent963 Месяц назад

      I don't think the coverage is to make light of the squirrel situation. It's more to call out the hypocrisy of Maga (them focusing on small meme-fueled edge stories instead of stuff that actually matters). If they truly wanted to "Make America Great Again",. the logical thing to do would be to focus on areas of the country where the problems are the worst. They want to shut down the Dept of Education, but Red States have lowest literacy. They want to up-end the HHS and FDA and complain about Obesity, but the most obese states are Red States. They want to do mass deportations, but barring California as number-1,.. Texas and Florida are 2nd and 3rd. Red States tend to take more in Federal funding, where Blue states tend on average to contribute more. So it's just hypocrisy through and through. The squirrel meme (or the "eating cats and dogs") are just ways for them to spin up hyperbolic fear about edge cases to keep people disinformed and fearful of problems that are actually small or in some cases don't even exist.

    • @neilchace1858
      @neilchace1858 Месяц назад

      It's a terrible story because the unqualified guy took the squirrel from the wild to keep as a pet. He was not a licensed wildlife rehabilitator so had no business taking the animal from the wild to house. It was blatantly illegal for the owner to have Peanut. The euthanasia was also completely necessary because Peanut bit someone- and it is only possible to test for rabies on an animal that is deceased.
      Furthermore, the MAGA people angry about this have been using their anger to send death threats and bomb threats to DEC officials, including people who had no involvement in this case- it's completely messed up to be targeting individuals who were doing their job and acting in accordance to NY state law.

    • @Fabdanc
      @Fabdanc Месяц назад +6

      A little context on the Peanut the Squirrel that a lot of people are missing. He never had the squirrel vaccinated for rabies, nor did he the raccoon. It is widely known and accepted that raccoons are vectors for rabies. He had the squirrel for 8 years and seemingly never took it to a vet OR attempted to fill the paperwork out at any time in the years prior -- all of which are completely standard practice in any rehabilitation practice and are in no way obscure or hard to find. When the authorities were on site, . When questioned whether either the squirrel or raccoon had current rabies vaccinations, the answer was "no" because *he never took them to the vet*. As is standard procedure because rabies is 100% fatal if contracted, the animals were seized, euthanized, and tested for rabies. The worker then still had to receive a series of 5 injections to prevent any possible contraction of rabies.
      I'll agree that it is sad that the squirrel and raccoon had to be euthanized... BUT it is more sad that their owner was too careless to take the proper steps and instead chose to exploit the animal to profit, internet fame, and to drive traffic to his OnlyFans account. It is 100% his own fault and he is trying to create a false narrative around the incident and trying to make it a "culture war" for his own profit just as he did the squirrel.

    • @melanielane
      @melanielane Месяц назад +1

      @ that’s fine, it’s still not something to have belly laughs over as they’ve done on two shows.

  • @puppypersonlotr4538
    @puppypersonlotr4538 Месяц назад

    Happy December all...🎉😂🤷‍♀️

  • @ShilohDeOro
    @ShilohDeOro Месяц назад

    help!
    562 blah blah blah
    888 blah blah blah
    3248 blah blah blah
    help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please
    this is not a joke ikjd

  • @utopio_ai
    @utopio_ai Месяц назад

    help me!

  • @utopio_ai
    @utopio_ai Месяц назад

    help me!

  • @utopio_ai
    @utopio_ai Месяц назад

    help me!