@@MisbehavedK9 You could argue there's no such thing as a sacrifice. There is a) moving into a much stronger or winning position (so hardly a sacrifice), or b) simply losing a piece. I would argue losing a high value piece to gain a better position counts as a sacrifice. The kid was prepared to lose his queen, and the fact the GM declined it proves it would have resulted in a better position for white. This 'sacrifice' was declined, but in my book it still counts. And what I say beats anyone else because I have the letters GM in my name (if you add a couple of letters).
Really bizarre game. After 13. Nd5? Black shouldn't trade knights, but should simply play 15...a4! and it leads to the win of material. I don't understand how Guseinov missed that. Very odd. Also, change the title of the video? Guseinov's peak rating was 2667. It never even crossed to 2700.
@@hroznyhroznys After 15...a4, the bishop on b3 is attacked. Then 16. Nxf6+, Bxf6, and the bishop on b3 has no good squares. If 17. Bxf6, axb3, and then 18.Bg5 Rxa2 leads to the gain of a pawn. If not 17. Bxf6 but instead 17. Bd5, white still has problems after the trade of dark-squared bishops.
This is no ordinary kid. His current rating is 2202 and he was 2262 at his peak in August. He's the #3 under-14-year-old player in Israel and the #67 under-14 player in the entire world. The queen sac was brilliant. I didn't see it coming. It was winning whether Guseinov accepted it or not. He might have still had a chance if he had played Ke7 instead of Rc7?? though at 16:33. That's what I would have played there, even though I didn't see the queen sac coming. It connects the rooks and then the sac wouldn't have been sound, because he could have taken the queen and stopped the pawn with the other rook. It also allows for Rcd8, if white plays Rhd1. I think they both missed good moves at the end though. I'm thinking that white should have played h7 instead of g5, to prevent Rg8 and force black to play Rh8 22:50. However, black blundered and played Rh8?? instead of Rg8 anyway, so it didn't matter 27:06. Oops. I guess he was on tilt at that point.
@@kh2freek that mby in theory, but in a youtube video, its mostly clickbait. nice move but pretty obvious at that point. it was not amazing, imo ( not a master by anymeans but either way) the mistake was at the point when he ate the bishop with queen, coulda move rock to b1 and then take it with rock where ever it may be next move and queen keeps the important black squares unavailable for white, and no doubt white dont want to take the extra pawn if it would mean queen exchange after losing free bish. so. yeh.
Incorrect, a piece sacrifice is exactly that. Sacrificing your piece. The only thing he sacked was his Bishop. It didn't get trapped, he did that on purpose to take the c6 pawn to later claim the file with his rook, which was beautifully set up.
@@kh2freek It's not a sacrifice, because it immediately gives white a new queen if black takes it (Rxg7 hxg7 and the pawn cannot be stopped from queening). A true sacrifice doesn't immediately regain the material like that.
When a kid played with me, I got emotional and sympathetic, I lost. When a really old guy played, I started respecting his age, I lost. After that, I saw neither a kid, nor an old man, and I won.
There comes a moment (in life) I think, when emotion should be a boon rather than a falsehood, even for an strategic and objective game, because we play humans. Self-confidence rather than self-doubt is a key strength to many athletes success. Visualizing victory, rather than questioning every moment of the game clears the picture. So I think it wasn't the fact that you were judgemental that led you to your loss, but it was your conclusions to your judgement. Surely the child is not as experienced and surely the old man becomes negligent. Use experience to your advantage. Robots don't see that, and that is a human strength! Always believe in yourself!
@@violinxxxcrazy To me it seems like the first paragraph was written in the style of the Declaration of Independence, the second paragraph in the style of a typical RUclips inspirational speaker, and the third paragraph reminds me of when Garry Kasparov was talking about the future of chess in some TED-Ed video I watched a couple of months ago. But your comment was very uplifting and cleverly written, unlike some other comments on RUclips these days.
@@richardpope6096 He is right, was a complex tactic maneuver involving: tactic weakness (rook was not defended by any other piece) peripheral weakness(no piece to guard same color squares, in this case dark squares) control by white of enemy 7th row (no other piece than the rook was defending the 7th and 8th rows). A piece sacrifice involves an attack variant(s) where the outcome is checkmate, but when you stand to recover the same or more material or gain strategic advantage in your position, it's a brilliant tactical attack, but not a sacrifice.
The fact that the young player was anxious to play and the GM was in deep thought was a reminder of my younger days playing this game. I wish I stayed with it, now I can't seem to not sacrifice 3 or 4 pieces a game for no apparent reason.
PYR0 He was sacrificing his own happiness for others. Google: “You should do GOOD because it is right and choosing that which is GOOD brings happiness as you reward yourself for that right choice. You are INCLUDED in all. Therefore you must be made happy as well. So it is again, clearly, immoral to sacrifice your happiness for others.”
Nice game. The kid was fearless. I've always felt this is the right strategy to play opponents that out rate u by 400 points or more. Try and create attacking chances even if it means sacrificing material. That kid is so smart. While the tactical awareness to punish the blunder was nice, the strategy was equally on point.
I thought that kid was/is smart too.I think he knew he had something going on the king side there from his earlier king rook pawn advancement and he was very patient developing a strategy and having it come to fruition.
Not really, he was completely lost. Guseinov juste made a huge blunder playing Rc7. Simple Bc6, followed by Qc7, let white triple n d file if thay want, it threatens nothing, black can then play e5, Ke7 and bring back the other rook in play. Re8 Kf8, no more counterplay for the piece down.
Personally, over time I've learned that it's important for me to study the board on my opponent's time. Basically use their time against them. As a kid though, I sometimes just had to get up and leave the board and come back.
2:20 was the turning point. The kid couldn't believe the gm fell for it. Sacrificing his bishop at 11:15 was part of white's plan to draw black's king away from the corner. The gm, never having developed anything, started hiding his face with his hands in despair, his nonchalence fading. Then there was the blunder with the rook at 16:34. This is a contest neither side will forget.
@@rypaz87 exactly, 17:24 is the moment he realized he's defeated the GM. He's totally overhelmed and almost surprised about himself on his genious move working out perfectly...
Bb7 was the star move of the game. White had to realize that black would be left with a fatal weakness on the dark squares after black plays Qxb7. The offered exchange sac (queen for rook) is easier to spot because a white pawn on g7 cannot be stopped if the queen is captured; the pawn would promote.
I still remember when GM Gadir Guseinov was the absolute King of WCN ( World Chess Network ) Chess server... I miss those times badly. WCN was a really really cool Site, very instructive and amazingly fun.
It is the sacrifice of an exchange declined, no doubt about that, but what is more astonishing to me is that Black is such a good sport and so calm in defeat. You can only guess what is passing within his head. It still is a gentlemen's game, on the whole, just like snooker.
18 g4 I was not expecting. This g pawn played a very important role in the game. Brilliant moves - 23 Rd2 also an outrageous move. But g5 was the killer move and made his opponent think for 4 minutes 10 seconds out of only 7.25 to go.
The kid mannerism and overall demeanor and looks reminds me and chills of fear down my spine. Such raw power and naivity...that most old people cannot see, this is the "all spark" that can create new worlds
I think the kid knew all along. Fidgeting and deliberating, feigning to make it up as he was going along etc was all part of his plan to distract gm, the latter used to playing at a faster pace and nonchalently believing it would be easy meat.
He offered a Queen sac, which was declined. There was no Queen sac. The 2700 GM played horribly. This is what happens when you under estimate your opponent.
Certainly, there was no queen sacrifice, I am curious as to why the description is so ... exaggerated. That probably explains how it is actually possible to get dislikes on a video of a chess game. And I suspect you are right about the underestimating; this GM forgot the golden rule and paid the price. It should be said too, his opponent played solidly.
@@emphyriohazzl1510 'Blatant'?! Oh my. That, for example, the Queen's Gambit Declined is still treated as a gambit - was the proposition, as much a question of language as of logic, put to you, more in sport than in earnest. It seems you failed to apprehend its subtlety, is all. It isn't really that important, but it really is sad that you feel the need to be uncivil, and to throw childish insults around. Bullet-headed pedant, where do you stand on that last hyphen? XD
E5 would not have worked as well as it would have locked white's queen into the corner, an unnecessary and counterproductive commitment. Not that it mattered much at that stage, G5 was the better move.
@@andrewptob In this position it hardly matters. His queen was not going to be going back out, I don't think, our GM was toast from the first complacent mistakes in the opening. To play e5 would have been wrong because it is in theoretical terms a poor move, only closing off your own queen's options for egress, when g5 is available and supports the H pawn sweetly - again in theory. Here it's a non-issue but why take the inferior move, ever? Anyway, we agree GIGGLE.
I am not sure if I am right because I have stopped playing chess for quite some time. I think the game changer move was Bishop B7 sacrifices that amaze me instead of the Queen G7 move. QxB7 that brought Black game into passive mode and destine to lose after that move. Once Black Queen out of the way, White Queen immediately take control on D6 line. It's amazing to see a trapped Bishop can make such a valuable sacrifice from the White. Impressive move.
defending a position takes a lot out of any one that at a certain point you will make a mistake it dosent matter who you are and the only this is attacker needs to do is to find that mistake while keeping initive and deal the finishing blow kid played brilliantly in middlegame with his light squared bishop and how he managed to create an attack
Nice game, bravo. This early a5 and/or b5 is not easy to handle at all in Dragon's Richter attack, but White was fearless and creative with Bb7 and had attack and searious compensation for the bishop and could punish black in a beatiful way after Rc7.
I was seeing the Qg7 idea when the rook was on c8 but this doesn't work as after Rxg7 hxg7 simply Ke7 and the rook guards the g8 square and prevents the pawn on g7 from becoming a queen. The kid was alert and as soon as Guseinov moved his rook from 8th rank he played Qg7 as now Rxg7 is not possible as simply hxg7 and black cannot stop white from queening. Thank u rapid chess for this game and I would love to see more♥️
I love the way the grandmaster castled then uncastled. Playing a dragon variation though dangerous at a faster speed - likely to lead to counterattacking and when playing a far weaker opponent best to grind out a win as complicated positions are more blunder-prone for both sides. I once also played in a rapid event against a far higher rated player when I was just 17-18 and started off badly, also blundering material, but like in this game my opponent took his eye off the ball thinking this was an easy one and ended up losing to me. Here the GM was blind to the Qg7 move. With the other rook no longer on the back-rank guardng g8 if Rxg7 hxg7 Ke7 he would lose a rook for a pawn by capturing the queen but would still be down an exchange with the passed pawn gone so maybe a better option than allowing Qxh7 leaving the pawn likely to promote anyway.
Hahaha, Ima' loving it :) The GM gets more and more sweaty and scratch his neck while this little, can't-sit-still-and-finger-piece-playing kid, is giving him a way harder run for his money than he had foreseen, the kid even look bored at times, God I love this match
Yes, I'm surprised the grandmaster didn't see it or thought he'd overcome it. Saving his rook would have been the better move while leaving Queen to hold that key position. It's difficult to overcome a destroyed corner position on King's side.
Capturing with the Q was a boo boo, right? Wouldn't it have been better for the rook to scoot from c8 to b8 and hit the B, and leaving the Q to guard d6?
QG7, and the game was over. the remaining 10 minutes, was just of the grandmaster contemplating his life decisions up to that point. When the GM played RC7, I was like yep, he just lost to a 10 year old lmaoo
Yes, that ...Rc7 was a blunder - Black needed to keep his rooks connected to control the back rank. ...Qc7 looks better. Now Qg7 doesn't work since Black can take the Queen and after Ke7 the other rook defends against g8(Q). With ...Qc7 Black threatens e5 closing off the long diagonal, and if Rhd1, then simply ...Rd8.
@@Lazarus_zer0_day No, Rc7 was the losing mistake. He was winning before that, after he's losing. You can see stockfish analysis of the game here: www.chessbomb.com/arena/2019-european-rapid-championship/01-Aizenberg_Benny-Guseinov_Gadir Kudos to Guseinov for taking the loss as well as he did. I'm sure he was very upset at himself but he never got outwardly emotional and took it out on the kid.
getting his bishop trapped was great for the kid, because it made him find a way to disrupt his opponent's coordination with the bishop decoy, and maybe it made his opponent overconfident. I'm 1600 but even I get a shiver up my spine letting the white queen take over the dark squares around my king that way. If Guseinov thinks for 30 seconds more he will just trap the bishop until it is safe to take.
Today I have sympathy for the GM, being an older guy losing to a kid - because of one very bad move. I can relate to the loss, not because I claim to be a GM but because I have lost to weaker players who happened to be much younger than I. Painful lesson: DO NOT BE OVERCONFIDENT! When I was a kid I would have been delighted for the kid to take such a prized win. (:
You are probably not stupid I missed it when they ended so quick and no sacrifice lol. But next move would take rook check .then takes queen ...it should say grand master gets beat by kid . Best pawn play ever...clickbait title
@@Metoo24 yes i see that, but even if the white queen takes brown queen, the castle above brown queen would take out the white queen or am i wrong here?
Taking that rook off the bottom file was the crucial error here which allowed white to play queen sac. Soon as black did that, it was relatively easy for white to see the next 5-6 moves leading to game over. Black taking the queen would have only made it easier. Fantastic tactical play by this young man
Could this queen offering have been done a move earlier? Rook d2 turned out to play no significance and the fact that black moved the rook off the back rank didnt matter because queen was there to take its place. Thoughts on this?
No, that loses completely for white. Once I explain this, you'll understand why the rook on the back rank (c8) was such a critical construction and why Rc7, a seemingly sensible innocent move is a ?? move. So, had the boy gone Qg7 immediately, as per your suggestion, black responds with a very strong: ...Rxg7; hxg7, Ke7!! connecting the c8 rook to the g8 square, preventing promotion. Let's say white continues with Rxh7. Black can blockade with...Rg8, stopping any pawn advances. And this is amazing because white doesn't have enough pieces to finish the attack. Black can play this position VERY slowly with ...b4-a4-b3, even. Completely stopping any pawn promotion ideas. As any Rh8 ideas by white drops the innocent monster pawn on g7. However, now compare this with the position that ensued. Rd2 was a waiting move. The kid was probably considering tripling on the d file, attacking the d7 bishop thrice. The GM felt compelled to defend it. I think even ...Rd8 was enough. But after ...Rc7 (??); Qg7 wins in all variations. Because now if ...Rxg7; hxg7 and black simply has no pieces on the back rank to stop g8=Q with killing effect. (See how crucial the role of c8 rook was?) Now, black is never on time to stop g8.
The game is instructional for several reasons: first of all, there's the destruction of the fianchetto, by trading the dark bishops and the advancing of the h-pawn., then there's the bishop decoy. That bishop is dead, so there's no need to capture immediately (20..Rc7). The black queen had to remain on the dark diagonal. Capturing immediately, surrendered the diagonal, and the game is lost
16...Rh8?! is probably a move to avoid a draw after 16...e6 17.hg hg 18. Qh6+ Kf6... and white is force to take a draw because Rh8 give a winning game for black. 18.g4? gives a big advantage to black but 18.a3 is likely winning for white. 22.Rg8?! is imprecise 22.f6! Qxf6 23.Rf8 is simply winning for black. 23...Rc7?? gives the game to white but 23...g4 24.Thd1 Bc6 is winning for black after a hard defense difficult in rapid game. The game is mostly representative of how it is difficult to win a winning game after white blunder 18.g4? black plays the right move 18...e6 but then make some mistakes on easy moves.
No, a queen sacrifice is a move played by one side which willingly allows the opponent to use the oppurtunity to capture the queen. It does not need to be captured to be a queen sacrifice.
Not necessarily in character, but how humans act in general. When an adult loses to a younger person, it feels more humiliating. People just want to get away from the situation. There's a lot of emotions dictating this, and I wouldn't necessarily say personal character.
For all the beginners that got clickbaited: He sacrifices a queen cuz if rook takes it and pawn recaptures, then no power on earth can stop the pawn from promoting to a queen, not only gaining a rook from the exchange but the king is also in a deadly position
It was noticeable that at one point the the GM was not taking a lot of notice, "he's just a kid". Eventually he woke up to his predicament! Very amusing.
Guseinov is one of the leading experts in the Accelerated Dragon, revitalising many secondary variations. It's weird that he decided to transpose to a regular Dragon.
The offer of Queen sacrifice was logical;Black couldn't accept. More important was White's Bishop sacrifice and excellent play with the King side pawns, and underestimate of his attack by Black
For those wondering, there is no Queen sacrifice. Black blundered horribly by Rc7, +- 16:35. You can see that he looks to his right just before moving, contemplates the board a bit, and moves. Up to that point, Black had a significant advantage that should have pretty much guaranteed him the win. I'm almost certain he realized his blunder almost immediately after having made it and was trying to keep a poker face on, hoping White wouldn't immediately Qg7. After White's Qg7 (17:05), it's clear his heart was no longer in the game. That kid was rated 2200 and he all but pinches himself when he realizes he's just been handed the game. He can barely contain himself once he has played Qg7, sealing the fate of the game whatever Black decides to do.
@@eebeats9370 If the kings are both on white squares (e4 and d5 ) then white won, if they are on black squares (d4 and e5) then black won, and if they are opposite each other (e4 and e5) then it was a draw. I think the reason of it is to signify on digital boards that the game has ended, but you much more often just see either a single king for the winner, or both kings for a draw as that is far more easy to tell the result at a glance
If you go back to where the kid was going to lose his white bishop and moved it to B2 to attack black's rook on C1, taking with the Queen conceded the dark squares to black and the Queen controlled. When the move before the queen moved to g2 where white moved rook to g1, there was an in between move for white before Q-g2. I wonder if black had played K-f1 if that might have held the position in that black might have been able to slip the King behind the advancing white pond. ie, rook takes queen, pawn takes rook queen has a square. I don't know if that works but it seems a better chance then the game.
okay. i have rudimentary chess knowledge. did this game end because it would have come down to the same moves for both sides, so in the end the GM's time would've run out?
@@bardiche1989 "cos u are noob". Let me translate that into English before I refute it... "Because you are inexperienced." Refutation - no I'm not, I've been playing for 35 years and am rated just under 2000.
@@bardiche1989 Well done. I must point out though that "noob" means "inexperienced", not "unskilled". And besides, I'm top 8%, according to the site I use to play chess. If you're better than me in less time, good for you. I'm not trying to "sound smart", just pointing out I'm not a noob. Also well done for demonstrating you can do grammar.
@@bardiche1989 FYI, chess sites tend to use the same method of rating calculation as your club. Our ratings are equally as worthless as one another. Neither are FIDE ratings. I'm not sure what your problem is, other than not knowing what "noob" means. Have a drink.
I'm not an expert at chess by any means, and it's been far too long since I have played. Can somebody explain to me why he couldn't just move the King back to E8? Is it because the queen would have then taken the rook, and eventually the pawns in the next few moves, then proceeded to move his own pawns up to become queens all while pestering the king and the GM simply gave up rather seeing all of that ahead of time?
I saw a white bishop commited suicide and a black tower missmoved from the backlane, but I didn't play chess for twenty years. Do I missunderstood something or both players made misstakes?
I was just gonna post this because I thought the bishop sac was ridiculously daring, then I saw that the bishop was already lost. The trap was set at 7:20 . After the pawn attack, the kid's bishop could only have moved to b3 then opponent moves a4 to close the trap. The bishop was lost, therefore the sac.
4 года назад
@@Jason-Moon Indeed. The bishop sac was very clever. It forced the black queen to move from b6, and that allowed a series of threads unbearable. Plus the black king is in horrible position. And probably blacks commited a couple of mistakes in my opinion.
16:33 Rc7 was a mistake in my opinion. If it stay in the 8 row, after Qg7 Rxg7 hxg7 Ke7 Rxh7 Qb8, is still a very bad situation for black, but Rc7 allows Qg7 without a single hope for black
The black rook to c7 at 16:33 allowed for the queen to take g7. That was a huge error. Kid saw the op and I think the GM also realized it afterwards and was definetly looking distraught. He had the advantage until that play. Good job to the kiddo for capitalizing.
I never thought chess clickbait would be a thing
I know, right?! LOL
Such an accurate comment
No he sacrificed his queen but opponent declined id
@@Trizzi2931 oh I'm aware but it doesn't count as a Queen sac imo if you don't lose your Queen. It's only a sacrifice if you lose a piece.
@@MisbehavedK9 You could argue there's no such thing as a sacrifice. There is a) moving into a much stronger or winning position (so hardly a sacrifice), or b) simply losing a piece. I would argue losing a high value piece to gain a better position counts as a sacrifice. The kid was prepared to lose his queen, and the fact the GM declined it proves it would have resulted in a better position for white. This 'sacrifice' was declined, but in my book it still counts. And what I say beats anyone else because I have the letters GM in my name (if you add a couple of letters).
Pro Tip: Play this video at 2x speed.
Oh thanks bro, sry pro bro
Really bizarre game. After 13. Nd5? Black shouldn't trade knights, but should simply play 15...a4! and it leads to the win of material. I don't understand how Guseinov missed that. Very odd.
Also, change the title of the video? Guseinov's peak rating was 2667. It never even crossed to 2700.
@@danielt.4330 Where's the win of material after a4?
I actually done that before i even read this. Defo a pro tip lol
@@hroznyhroznys After 15...a4, the bishop on b3 is attacked. Then 16. Nxf6+, Bxf6, and the bishop on b3 has no good squares. If 17. Bxf6, axb3, and then 18.Bg5 Rxa2 leads to the gain of a pawn.
If not 17. Bxf6 but instead 17. Bd5, white still has problems after the trade of dark-squared bishops.
it’s cute how we can almost feel his heart racing when he realizes that he’s just won
He realized he won long before you think he did.
Brilliant move!this kid is amasing inded.
This is no ordinary kid. His current rating is 2202 and he was 2262 at his peak in August. He's the #3 under-14-year-old player in Israel and the #67 under-14 player in the entire world. The queen sac was brilliant. I didn't see it coming. It was winning whether Guseinov accepted it or not. He might have still had a chance if he had played Ke7 instead of Rc7?? though at 16:33. That's what I would have played there, even though I didn't see the queen sac coming. It connects the rooks and then the sac wouldn't have been sound, because he could have taken the queen and stopped the pawn with the other rook. It also allows for Rcd8, if white plays Rhd1. I think they both missed good moves at the end though. I'm thinking that white should have played h7 instead of g5, to prevent Rg8 and force black to play Rh8 22:50. However, black blundered and played Rh8?? instead of Rg8 anyway, so it didn't matter 27:06. Oops. I guess he was on tilt at that point.
Quem veio pelo Rafael Chess, dá um like
Eu😊
Já estava procurando esse comentário hahaha
o momento que o Rafael Chess comentou do erro do GM 16:31
O infantiloide?
EU VIM PELO RAFAEL CHES E MANO O MENINO DE 13 ANOS É MUITO BOM
EU NÃO TINHA A MENOR CHANCE CONTRA ELE
KKK
I sacrifice my queen all the time but I never win
Means you blunder it
hahaha you are funny !
😂😂😂
:D
Because you sacrifice it in the wrong moment and without calculating the damage and also about other effects that can helps.
More Precise Title for this Masterpiece : " Kid Outplayed 2700 Grandmaster With a Queen Sacrifice INVITATION " 😀👍
And yet it's not just an invitation. It's a winning move, either the queen is accepted or not.
A sacrifice is a sacrifice whether it is accepted or not
@@kh2freek that mby in theory, but in a youtube video, its mostly clickbait. nice move but pretty obvious at that point. it was not amazing, imo ( not a master by anymeans but either way) the mistake was at the point when he ate the bishop with queen, coulda move rock to b1 and then take it with rock where ever it may be next move and queen keeps the important black squares unavailable for white, and no doubt white dont want to take the extra pawn if it would mean queen exchange after losing free bish. so. yeh.
Incorrect, a piece sacrifice is exactly that. Sacrificing your piece. The only thing he sacked was his Bishop. It didn't get trapped, he did that on purpose to take the c6 pawn to later claim the file with his rook, which was beautifully set up.
@@kh2freek It's not a sacrifice, because it immediately gives white a new queen if black takes it (Rxg7 hxg7 and the pawn cannot be stopped from queening). A true sacrifice doesn't immediately regain the material like that.
Quem veio pelo Rafael leite da um like
Que partida sensacional. Vlw Xadrez Brasil. Vlw Rafael Leite
Diretamente de la! haha
@XadrezBrasil
Opa!
Acabei de vir pelo último vídeo do Rafael Chess
Quem é brazuca manda aquele salve aí!!!! 🇧🇷🇧🇷
The last 5 minutes this dude just couldn't accept defeat.
Last ten :-DD
@@WAPBodie Last 15
nope he is calculating if there was a save and evaluating is there a comeback and then gave up
When a kid played with me, I got emotional and sympathetic, I lost. When a really old guy played, I started respecting his age, I lost. After that, I saw neither a kid, nor an old man, and I won.
There comes a moment (in life) I think, when emotion should be a boon rather than a falsehood,
even for an strategic and objective game, because we play humans.
Self-confidence rather than self-doubt is a key strength to many athletes success.
Visualizing victory, rather than questioning every moment of the game clears the picture.
So I think it wasn't the fact that you were judgemental that led you to your loss, but it was your conclusions to your judgement.
Surely the child is not as experienced and surely the old man becomes negligent.
Use experience to your advantage. Robots don't see that, and that is a human strength!
Always believe in yourself!
@@violinxxxcrazy well said
That was downright poetic. I click like.
Bro ... Is there any one there with you when you won ?
@@violinxxxcrazy To me it seems like the first paragraph was written in the style of the Declaration of Independence, the second paragraph in the style of a typical RUclips inspirational speaker, and the third paragraph reminds me of when Garry Kasparov was talking about the future of chess in some TED-Ed video I watched a couple of months ago. But your comment was very uplifting and cleverly written, unlike some other comments on RUclips these days.
Usually sacrifice my queen by accident. 🤷♂️
Something like: "It's best to sacrifice your opponent's pieces". Tartakover, who else?
A botez gambit
Hehehe ^_^
"First-class players lose to second class players because second class players sometimes play a first-class game." ---Siegbert Tarrash
There are no first class nor second class they are all registered !
I think it's more that the first class player missed his opponent queen g7
In that case you are not a first class !
Even gm sometime in poor form.
@@Christoff070 it was an excellent tactic because Rxg7 hxg7 and then g= Q
Quem veio pelo xadrez Brasil?
Aqui rapaz
@@hugoreis1061 boa
Eu kkkk
eu vim. uhuhu
Up
Fala galerinha do xadrez 🇧🇷🇧🇷
Tudo beleeeezaa??
Abandonou porque??
@@jonathanmatos1275 porque não dá mais
@@jonathanmatos1275 pq é mate imparavel
Amazing how he managed to keep his Queen on the board after the sacrifice.
Had Black taken the Queen White would have gained a Rook and gotten another Queen, no real sac.
I'm sensing sarcasm.
@@richardpope6096 He is right, was a complex tactic maneuver involving: tactic weakness (rook was not defended by any other piece) peripheral weakness(no piece to guard same color squares, in this case dark squares) control by white of enemy 7th row (no other piece than the rook was defending the 7th and 8th rows). A piece sacrifice involves an attack variant(s) where the outcome is checkmate, but when you stand to recover the same or more material or gain strategic advantage in your position, it's a brilliant tactical attack, but not a sacrifice.
The fact that the young player was anxious to play and the GM was in deep thought was a reminder of my younger days playing this game. I wish I stayed with it, now I can't seem to not sacrifice 3 or 4 pieces a game for no apparent reason.
So a blunder...
they are not sacrifices if they are for no reason
PYR0 He was sacrificing his own happiness for others.
Google:
“You should do GOOD because it is right and choosing that which is GOOD brings happiness as you reward yourself for that right choice. You are INCLUDED in all. Therefore you must be made happy as well. So it is again, clearly, immoral to sacrifice your happiness for others.”
@@xivjm1778 blunder usually implies you missed a tactic and dropped a piece, whereas sacrifice means it was intentional
Justin Time I agree but he wasn’t sacrificing if it was for no apparent reason. They are complete blunders
Nice game. The kid was fearless. I've always felt this is the right strategy to play opponents that out rate u by 400 points or more. Try and create attacking chances even if it means sacrificing material. That kid is so smart. While the tactical awareness to punish the blunder was nice, the strategy was equally on point.
I thought that kid was/is smart too.I think he knew he had something going on the king side there from his earlier king rook pawn advancement and he was very patient developing a strategy and having it come to fruition.
Not really, he was completely lost. Guseinov juste made a huge blunder playing Rc7. Simple Bc6, followed by Qc7, let white triple n d file if thay want, it threatens nothing, black can then play e5, Ke7 and bring back the other rook in play. Re8 Kf8, no more counterplay for the piece down.
2200 is what 'the kid,' aka Aizenberg, is, you sentimental sweetie hehehe
@@emphyriohazzl1510 True, but he kept his head and kept playing solidly and punished his opponent's mistakes in textbook fashion!
Please explain to me how the game was won at the end, I am dying of curiosity ._. ...
So rude of the players to interrupt the coughing competition
maybe this was the covid-19 competition :-)
I have seen this comment before
Ya these stupid ticking that dummy clock. Other wise game was interesting. He did eehhuu, other replied ahem oohhaa. What a move.
I mean whats a chess competition without a boatload of coughs? Its probably from all that cigar smoke!
You know you’re winning when you keep looking around at other games, and losing when your eyes are just fixed on the board
Personally, over time I've learned that it's important for me to study the board on my opponent's time. Basically use their time against them. As a kid though, I sometimes just had to get up and leave the board and come back.
Using mask while watching the vid is highly recommended.
The kid's mannerisms are simply adorable! Superb Game - cool Win!
What i like from watching the battle between gm is their expression,they keep calm even after they know that they are already loose
except for hikaru ufc
2:20 was the turning point. The kid couldn't believe the gm fell for it. Sacrificing his bishop at 11:15 was part of white's plan to draw black's king away from the corner. The gm, never having developed anything, started hiding his face with his hands in despair, his nonchalence fading. Then there was the blunder with the rook at 16:34. This is a contest neither side will forget.
= You know that you've played too much chess when you think you can feel what each side must be feeling.
There is no kid in chess- all warriors.
"Chess is above all, a fight". That was by Emanuel Lasker if I'm not mistaken...
Well said
But shouldn't children be exempt from going to trench in time war?
I think too that the 'kid' in this title and description is on the clickbait side.
Lol 🤣
This "kid" is still 2200 FIDE, nothing to sneeze at. He was probably underrated, and may still be.
What's his name ?
@@devaansheeagarwal7170 Aizenberg, Benny
Thanks, I was wondering about his rating. That is a fearsome rating in anyone's books.
Found the BF fan! Cheers =)
This kid is a lot stronger than his rating. Relentless pressure on his opponent. Love his style!
17:24, the time this kid and the kid on the other table (just back to his seat) is starting to get bored waiting for the move of the two adults 😁
I would bet that he is the exact opposite of bored in that position.
@@rypaz87 exactly, 17:24 is the moment he realized he's defeated the GM. He's totally overhelmed and almost surprised about himself on his genious move working out perfectly...
Bb7 was the star move of the game. White had to realize that black would be left with a fatal weakness on the dark squares after black plays Qxb7. The offered exchange sac (queen for rook) is easier to spot because a white pawn on g7 cannot be stopped if the queen is captured; the pawn would promote.
07:53 he's like: god damn why do i need to waste my time with this kid
16:40 the look on Guseinov's face: "oops, that's not good"
I agree. I thought the same.
Tbh that was a blunder of a move.
He forgot what every Russian schoolboy knows: "Never underestimate your opponent." :-)
b4
@@juanangeleri what b4?
Tremendous young talent, such a crushing win, great play, well done !
Pretty much just luck, I dont think he planned to lose that bishop in such a way.
Quite an amazing game for sure. They need wider tables or it's a battle for the elbows.
I still remember when GM Gadir Guseinov was the absolute King of WCN ( World Chess Network ) Chess server... I miss those times badly. WCN was a really really cool Site, very instructive and amazingly fun.
It is the sacrifice of an exchange declined, no doubt about that, but what is more astonishing to me is that Black is such a good sport and so calm in defeat. You can only guess what is passing within his head. It still is a gentlemen's game, on the whole, just like snooker.
Chess games background noises: microwave sound and coughing.
lol in the middle of a pandemic!! is this happening in an isolated ward of sick covid patients?
18 g4 I was not expecting. This g pawn played a very important role in the game. Brilliant moves - 23 Rd2 also an outrageous move. But g5 was the killer move and made his opponent think for 4 minutes 10 seconds out of only 7.25 to go.
ygg drasil YES. I could not agree more with your comments. I was shocked at all of those subtle moves.
E5 also Win, the gm Just cocky and overlooked qg7(the winning move)
g5 is the most natural move in that position to exploit black square weakness. Black should have played Rc8 instead of Qc8
I agree. Once I saw him play g5, I knew he didn't get lucky.
I mean, credit to both guys for their sportsmanship. I came here to watch a grown man cry.
The kid mannerism and overall demeanor and looks reminds me and chills of fear down my spine. Such raw power and naivity...that most old people cannot see, this is the "all spark" that can create new worlds
You watch to much anime my g
I think the kid knew all along. Fidgeting and deliberating, feigning to make it up as he was going along etc was all part of his plan to distract gm, the latter used to playing at a faster pace and nonchalently believing it would be easy meat.
After the boys emotions as he plays, what I like most is his eyes going back and forth as he calculates. amazing game
He offered a Queen sac, which was declined. There was no Queen sac. The 2700 GM played horribly. This is what happens when you under estimate your opponent.
100 % right bro
That is right !
Certainly, there was no queen sacrifice, I am curious as to why the description is so ... exaggerated. That probably explains how it is actually possible to get dislikes on a video of a chess game. And I suspect you are right about the underestimating; this GM forgot the golden rule and paid the price. It should be said too, his opponent played solidly.
A declined queen sacrifice is still a queen sacrifice. Your statement, (the first 2 sentences) shows a blatant lack of logic :).
@@emphyriohazzl1510 'Blatant'?! Oh my. That, for example, the Queen's Gambit Declined is still treated as a gambit - was the proposition, as much a question of language as of logic, put to you, more in sport than in earnest. It seems you failed to apprehend its subtlety, is all. It isn't really that important, but it really is sad that you feel the need to be uncivil, and to throw childish insults around. Bullet-headed pedant, where do you stand on that last hyphen? XD
Best move of the game in my opinion was pawn to g5 at 22:50. That cemented the loss for black.
That or e5 probably would have worked as well. White had total control of the dark squares, so the move was natural and could be seen far in advance.
E5 would not have worked as well as it would have locked white's queen into the corner, an unnecessary and counterproductive commitment. Not that it mattered much at that stage, G5 was the better move.
hinteregions e5 would’ve served much of the same purpose, but I think this kid played the best move there with g5
@@andrewptob In this position it hardly matters. His queen was not going to be going back out, I don't think, our GM was toast from the first complacent mistakes in the opening. To play e5 would have been wrong because it is in theoretical terms a poor move, only closing off your own queen's options for egress, when g5 is available and supports the H pawn sweetly - again in theory. Here it's a non-issue but why take the inferior move, ever? Anyway, we agree GIGGLE.
hinteregions I agree! 🙂👍
The kid has talent, for sure. Great game! 👏👏👏👏👏
I am not sure if I am right because I have stopped playing chess for quite some time. I think the game changer move was Bishop B7 sacrifices that amaze me instead of the Queen G7 move. QxB7 that brought Black game into passive mode and destine to lose after that move. Once Black Queen out of the way, White Queen immediately take control on D6 line. It's amazing to see a trapped Bishop can make such a valuable sacrifice from the White. Impressive move.
defending a position takes a lot out of any one that at a certain point you will make a mistake it dosent matter who you are and the only this is attacker needs to do is to find that mistake while keeping initive and deal the finishing blow kid played brilliantly in middlegame with his light squared bishop and how he managed to create an attack
Nice game, bravo. This early a5 and/or b5 is not easy to handle at all in Dragon's Richter attack, but White was fearless and creative with Bb7 and had attack and searious compensation for the bishop and could punish black in a beatiful way after Rc7.
There is no compensation with Bb7! White wins only because black play horrible blunder Rc7!
@@_dalex_mopnex2372 This was not Rc7! but Rc7?? :D
@@_dalex_mopnex2372 Bb7 invites QXb7, leaving black diagonal available for white queen. Deflection, transforming threats into opportunities...
If you listen to the background, you can hear the coughing and spread of the disease ._.
Frederick Douglas Seriously!!! This was probably the epicenter of the virus at one point....
The kid demonstrating his immunity
Frederick Douglas corona
Queen Corona lol
Yeah 🤣
I was seeing the Qg7 idea when the rook was on c8 but this doesn't work as after Rxg7 hxg7 simply Ke7 and the rook guards the g8 square and prevents the pawn on g7 from becoming a queen. The kid was alert and as soon as Guseinov moved his rook from 8th rank he played Qg7 as now Rxg7 is not possible as simply hxg7 and black cannot stop white from queening. Thank u rapid chess for this game and I would love to see more♥️
The queen was never on b8. The first time it ever got to b8 happened some time after the Qg7 move.
Which queen was on the b8
@@chessandmathguy my bad I meant the rook on c8. Rest all makes sense
Gm was avoiding draw by repetition Ke7 Qd6+..... And then Qd4 again
Yeah the rook protects the 8th rank nur you can take in h7 than play rh8 and this idea is unstoppable
I love the way the grandmaster castled then uncastled. Playing a dragon variation though dangerous at a faster speed - likely to lead to counterattacking and when playing a far weaker opponent best to grind out a win as complicated positions are more blunder-prone for both sides. I once also played in a rapid event against a far higher rated player when I was just 17-18 and started off badly, also blundering material, but like in this game my opponent took his eye off the ball thinking this was an easy one and ended up losing to me.
Here the GM was blind to the Qg7 move. With the other rook no longer on the back-rank guardng g8 if Rxg7 hxg7 Ke7 he would lose a rook for a pawn by capturing the queen but would still be down an exchange with the passed pawn gone so maybe a better option than allowing Qxh7 leaving the pawn likely to promote anyway.
Hahaha, Ima' loving it :) The GM gets more and more sweaty and scratch his neck while this little, can't-sit-still-and-finger-piece-playing kid, is giving him a way harder run for his money than he had foreseen, the kid even look bored at times, God I love this match
Actually the kid got lucky with that move the 2700 made a blunder but up until that move was outplaying the kid. The kid was even down a piece.
the bishop sacrifice to moove the queen was brilliant
Yes, I'm surprised the grandmaster didn't see it or thought he'd overcome it. Saving his rook would have been the better move while leaving Queen to hold that key position. It's difficult to overcome a destroyed corner position on King's side.
Capturing with the Q was a boo boo, right? Wouldn't it have been better for the rook to scoot from c8 to b8 and hit the B, and leaving the Q to guard d6?
QG7, and the game was over. the remaining 10 minutes, was just of the grandmaster contemplating his life decisions up to that point. When the GM played RC7, I was like yep, he just lost to a 10 year old lmaoo
Yes, that ...Rc7 was a blunder - Black needed to keep his rooks connected to control the back rank. ...Qc7 looks better. Now Qg7 doesn't work since Black can take the Queen and after Ke7 the other rook defends against g8(Q). With ...Qc7 Black threatens e5 closing off the long diagonal, and if Rhd1, then simply ...Rd8.
hahah totally agree!
I think GM noticed his blunder as soon as he let go of the rook. Even GMs blunder.
I'm Elfo he was already lost at that point
@@Lazarus_zer0_day No, Rc7 was the losing mistake. He was winning before that, after he's losing. You can see stockfish analysis of the game here: www.chessbomb.com/arena/2019-european-rapid-championship/01-Aizenberg_Benny-Guseinov_Gadir
Kudos to Guseinov for taking the loss as well as he did. I'm sure he was very upset at himself but he never got outwardly emotional and took it out on the kid.
getting his bishop trapped was great for the kid, because it made him find a way to disrupt his opponent's coordination with the bishop decoy, and maybe it made his opponent overconfident. I'm 1600 but even I get a shiver up my spine letting the white queen take over the dark squares around my king that way. If Guseinov thinks for 30 seconds more he will just trap the bishop until it is safe to take.
I have no idea how this game is played but it’s fascinating to see the courtesies that are done.
Estou aqui por Xadrez Brasil
I am confused... why did the game end? He still was able to move his king back to the last row?
Because it meant he lost the rook and then would have no way to stop the pawn from promoting and mating.
it would of been forced checkmate in 4 moves when they shook hands. No way to stop it.
If the black move his king back, the white just need to move his queen and checkmate... He knew it will be checkmate the next turn anyway.
This kid looks like , he just woke up and someone invites him to chess tournament . haha .
the comment below you is literally the same
@@ApartmentAngelsFireStarters it is a comment
Well it looks like someone just got out of the toilet, watches a game of chess on RUclips then leaves a comment about how tired someone looks.
@@yujiahe7397 IF he is anything like me when I started playing chess, he probably never went to sleep before the tournament- played blitz all night
it's L
Im a casual chess player so please excuse my ignorance but how did the kid win in the end? When they shook hands it wasn't checkmate.
man, i was riveted to my seat...grabbed a six pack for the duration...kept combing my hair and wanted a mask but the suspense had me!!
2700? How can he defeat that many? Thats a lot of grandmasters! Amazing!
I think it's referring to the ranking point of the GM he defeated.
I think that could be the worst miss understanding of all time
lRoyal Mid he is joking for sure
@@stormtrooper-w4e woosh
@@stormtrooper-w4e And that's the worst spelling of 'misunderstanding' I have ever seen hehe.
Before Rc7 eval : -1.09
After Rc7 eval: 3.73
😓
Rc7? it cannot be just +3 the kid will be up at least a rook
He was up a rook, look at the useless one sitting on g8
@@JohnVC lichess says its +8.4 after Rc7 cuz the g8 rook is for free and that h pawn will be a queen soon
Today I have sympathy for the GM, being an older guy losing to a kid - because of one very bad move. I can relate to the loss, not because I claim to be a GM but because I have lost to weaker players who happened to be much younger than I. Painful lesson: DO NOT BE OVERCONFIDENT! When I was a kid I would have been delighted for the kid to take such a prized win. (:
am i the only one who doesn't see the game end? Or am i just stupid
You are probably not stupid I missed it when they ended so quick and no sacrifice lol. But next move would take rook check .then takes queen ...it should say grand master gets beat by kid . Best pawn play ever...clickbait title
@@Metoo24 yes i see that, but even if the white queen takes brown queen, the castle above brown queen would take out the white queen or am i wrong here?
Nah you're not, don't play chess so I'm confused on why or how he lost
Queen forces king back and queen takes rook... then white is 3 moves from promoting pawn to queen and checkmate
Qf6 Ke8 Qxg8 Ke7 Qf6 Ke8 g7... fait accompli
NRG jstn branching out from Rocket League to take down grandmasters on his spare time. 3000 IQ
Taking that rook off the bottom file was the crucial error here which allowed white to play queen sac. Soon as black did that, it was relatively easy for white to see the next 5-6 moves leading to game over. Black taking the queen would have only made it easier. Fantastic tactical play by this young man
Could this queen offering have been done a move earlier? Rook d2 turned out to play no significance and the fact that black moved the rook off the back rank didnt matter because queen was there to take its place. Thoughts on this?
No, that loses completely for white. Once I explain this, you'll understand why the rook on the back rank (c8) was such a critical construction and why Rc7, a seemingly sensible innocent move is a ?? move.
So, had the boy gone Qg7 immediately, as per your suggestion, black responds with a very strong: ...Rxg7; hxg7, Ke7!! connecting the c8 rook to the g8 square, preventing promotion. Let's say white continues with Rxh7. Black can blockade with...Rg8, stopping any pawn advances. And this is amazing because white doesn't have enough pieces to finish the attack. Black can play this position VERY slowly with ...b4-a4-b3, even. Completely stopping any pawn promotion ideas. As any Rh8 ideas by white drops the innocent monster pawn on g7.
However, now compare this with the position that ensued. Rd2 was a waiting move. The kid was probably considering tripling on the d file, attacking the d7 bishop thrice. The GM felt compelled to defend it. I think even ...Rd8 was enough. But after ...Rc7 (??); Qg7 wins in all variations. Because now if ...Rxg7; hxg7 and black simply has no pieces on the back rank to stop g8=Q with killing effect. (See how crucial the role of c8 rook was?) Now, black is never on time to stop g8.
O
Black move his rook to Rc7, a blunder move!
Wonderful
The game is instructional for several reasons: first of all, there's the destruction of the fianchetto, by trading the dark bishops and the advancing of the h-pawn., then there's the bishop decoy. That bishop is dead, so there's no need to capture immediately (20..Rc7). The black queen had to remain on the dark diagonal. Capturing immediately, surrendered the diagonal, and the game is lost
16...Rh8?! is probably a move to avoid a draw after 16...e6 17.hg hg 18. Qh6+ Kf6... and white is force to take a draw because Rh8 give a winning game for black.
18.g4? gives a big advantage to black but 18.a3 is likely winning for white.
22.Rg8?! is imprecise 22.f6! Qxf6 23.Rf8 is simply winning for black.
23...Rc7?? gives the game to white but 23...g4 24.Thd1 Bc6 is winning for black after a hard defense difficult in rapid game.
The game is mostly representative of how it is difficult to win a winning game after white blunder 18.g4? black plays the right move 18...e6 but then make some mistakes on easy moves.
Great video! Its the perfect camera-angle for me.
I never thought that QG7 was possible until he dropped it on that square🙈! This kid will someday face the likes of Wesley, Anish, Fab, Ding etc💪!
Kid: Puts grown man into check mate
Me, knowing nothing about chess: *Ah yes great move I would have done the same*
A Queen sacrifice is when you sacrifice ( lose your Queen ) to win the game. He still has his Queen.
No, a queen sacrifice is a move played by one side which willingly allows the opponent to use the oppurtunity to capture the queen. It does not need to be captured to be a queen sacrifice.
The GM didn't make eye contact when shaking hands at the end. The kid did, Says alot about the characters of both.
Not necessarily in character, but how humans act in general. When an adult loses to a younger person, it feels more humiliating. People just want to get away from the situation. There's a lot of emotions dictating this, and I wouldn't necessarily say personal character.
He was simply shocked lol.
For all the beginners that got clickbaited:
He sacrifices a queen cuz if rook takes it and pawn recaptures, then no power on earth can stop the pawn from promoting to a queen, not only gaining a rook from the exchange but the king is also in a deadly position
did he give up this game ? and why?
The correct title would be "Immortal Queen" since it cannot be killed.
It was noticeable that at one point the the GM was not taking a lot of notice, "he's just a kid".
Eventually he woke up to his predicament!
Very amusing.
After he trapped the bishop he seemed to relax too much. I am sure he thought he had the game in the bag at that point.
@@Mantose262 biskoparna ner satans !
Guseinov is one of the leading experts in the Accelerated Dragon, revitalising many secondary variations. It's weird that he decided to transpose to a regular Dragon.
He's seen the kid play before...
The offer of Queen sacrifice was logical;Black couldn't accept. More important was White's Bishop sacrifice and excellent play with the King side pawns, and underestimate of his attack by Black
For those wondering, there is no Queen sacrifice.
Black blundered horribly by Rc7, +- 16:35.
You can see that he looks to his right just before moving, contemplates the board a bit, and moves.
Up to that point, Black had a significant advantage that should have pretty much guaranteed him the win.
I'm almost certain he realized his blunder almost immediately after having made it and was trying to keep a poker face on, hoping White wouldn't immediately Qg7.
After White's Qg7 (17:05), it's clear his heart was no longer in the game.
That kid was rated 2200 and he all but pinches himself when he realizes he's just been handed the game.
He can barely contain himself once he has played Qg7, sealing the fate of the game whatever Black decides to do.
25:34 I liked the game back there fast and no joke jajaja
I didn't know that Mr Bean was a chess GM .
Jerry Anstey he is an Oxford engineer in disguise, so he has all the necessary requirements
thats a GOOD ONE!
Lol
LMAO😂
What ? Seriously ?
i love rapid chess tournaments. Congrates kid for this brillant victory!
Dude why they put 2 kings to the center after the match? In my country we don't do it and what does it mean, can u explain?
@@eebeats9370 WHITE KING= WHITE WIN, BLACK KING=BLACK WIN, BOTH KINGS=DRAW
@@davebax6899 but there was 2 kings
@@eebeats9370 it signifies a draw was made
@@eebeats9370 If the kings are both on white squares (e4 and d5 ) then white won, if they are on black squares (d4 and e5) then black won, and if they are opposite each other (e4 and e5) then it was a draw. I think the reason of it is to signify on digital boards that the game has ended, but you much more often just see either a single king for the winner, or both kings for a draw as that is far more easy to tell the result at a glance
If you go back to where the kid was going to lose his white bishop and moved it to B2 to attack black's rook on C1, taking with the Queen conceded the dark squares to black and the Queen controlled. When the move before the queen moved to g2 where white moved rook to g1, there was an in between move for white before Q-g2. I wonder if black had played K-f1 if that might have held the position in that black might have been able to slip the King behind the advancing white pond. ie, rook takes queen, pawn takes rook queen has a square. I don't know if that works but it seems a better chance then the game.
okay. i have rudimentary chess knowledge. did this game end because it would have come down to the same moves for both sides, so in the end the GM's time would've run out?
Honestly, if some kid was sat opposite me destroying me with chess like this, I'd be smiling. It's a badge of honour.
@@bardiche1989 Lol
@@bardiche1989 "cos u are noob". Let me translate that into English before I refute it... "Because you are inexperienced."
Refutation - no I'm not, I've been playing for 35 years and am rated just under 2000.
@@bardiche1989 Well done. I must point out though that "noob" means "inexperienced", not "unskilled". And besides, I'm top 8%, according to the site I use to play chess. If you're better than me in less time, good for you. I'm not trying to "sound smart", just pointing out I'm not a noob. Also well done for demonstrating you can do grammar.
@@bardiche1989 "curb your ego", he says while massaging his ego.
@@bardiche1989 FYI, chess sites tend to use the same method of rating calculation as your club. Our ratings are equally as worthless as one another. Neither are FIDE ratings. I'm not sure what your problem is, other than not knowing what "noob" means. Have a drink.
Rc7 was an obvious blunder of the GM))
Rc7 was a blunder, b4 with Bb5 was the way
@@RsGhost1 Rook was on g8 then not h8, your move is impossible.
I'm not an expert at chess by any means, and it's been far too long since I have played. Can somebody explain to me why he couldn't just move the King back to E8? Is it because the queen would have then taken the rook, and eventually the pawns in the next few moves, then proceeded to move his own pawns up to become queens all while pestering the king and the GM simply gave up rather seeing all of that ahead of time?
I don't it get either, seems like GM just gave up. That would've resulted in a draw.
I admire kid's preparation to unleash the hell . He moved his rook to defend pawn
yup ... deprived black of a tempo
O Rafael me viciou kkk
Vim pelo Raffael chess,quem mais?
good game, but its kind of a clickbait calling it a queen sacrifice...
I saw a white bishop commited suicide and a black tower missmoved from the backlane, but I didn't play chess for twenty years. Do I missunderstood something or both players made misstakes?
The bishop sacrifice was the key, actually.
I was just gonna post this because I thought the bishop sac was ridiculously daring, then I saw that the bishop was already lost. The trap was set at 7:20 . After the pawn attack, the kid's bishop could only have moved to b3 then opponent moves a4 to close the trap. The bishop was lost, therefore the sac.
@@Jason-Moon Indeed. The bishop sac was very clever. It forced the black queen to move from b6, and that allowed a series of threads unbearable. Plus the black king is in horrible position. And probably blacks commited a couple of mistakes in my opinion.
18:06 the queen sac denied when he moves rook to king instead of taking the queen due to the fact that promotion of the pawn is impossible to deny.
[Fishbro] Yes, I finally picked up on that. In my defense looking at the board at such an angle which I am not used to; got to have some excuse.
16:33 Rc7 was a mistake in my opinion. If it stay in the 8 row, after Qg7 Rxg7 hxg7 Ke7 Rxh7 Qb8, is still a very bad situation for black, but Rc7 allows Qg7 without a single hope for black
@@calcioscacchi moving the queen instead of the rook after the "queen sacrifice" was also a mistake
@@calcioscacchi i thought do aswell
@@kissthefish2188 ur right...but not until u finished watching this
@16:39 the exact moment when he realized the queen sac was winning.
No no, you’re mistaken, It was 10:05 !
u both are wrong. There is not any f.. queen sacrifice
who is this kid and what is his rating now ?
It would have been nice if the grown up had congratulated the kid or at least give him a smile . Chess players take it much too seriously in general.
Come back from being down a piece against a gm 2700 rating is no easy undertaking one of the best games I have seen in years.
The black rook to c7 at 16:33 allowed for the queen to take g7. That was a huge error. Kid saw the op and I think the GM also realized it afterwards and was definetly looking distraught. He had the advantage until that play. Good job to the kiddo for capitalizing.