Kirchhoff's Laws - IB Physics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @keeganohara5462
    @keeganohara5462 2 года назад +9

    Watching this I felt like the SpongeBob meme where SpongeBob has binoculars and is like "write that down, write that down."

  • @rudefrog9726
    @rudefrog9726 8 месяцев назад +1

    9:08, V1 is not I1 x R1 its I2 x R1. and 9:13 its not I3 multiplied by the "second current" its I3 multiplied by R2. Thanks for the video btw!

  • @ruchitaobhan1232
    @ruchitaobhan1232 10 месяцев назад +1

    why would the 18 volts in loop 3 not be positive? Would it not be 3V - I3(400) - (-18V) since the current going in the battery is in opposite direction?

  • @kadiryel6237
    @kadiryel6237 Год назад +4

    This was the only video that was actually quite good about this topic. But, as a suggestion, I would say it could be better if you could use drawings when explaining the signs instead of just telling them verbally. It seems complex for many as to why the potential differences are taken positive or negative in the loop, so a bit more clarification on that would be extremely helpful, Sir. Regardless, thanks a lot.

  • @danielchoi3440
    @danielchoi3440 2 года назад +5

    Best Video on kirchhoff’s law

  • @cherylhli
    @cherylhli 2 года назад +3

    Thanks for the video, it was really helpful! At 1:08, did you mean "the battery subtracts voltage and resistors add voltage"? Since V=IR I guess it's the same thing but I was wondering if the focus here should be on voltage instead. Thank you!

  • @micz6319
    @micz6319 Год назад +2

    everything was great but i got lost when you started explaining the 3 loops, it got really chaotic for me

    • @AndyMasley
      @AndyMasley  Год назад +1

      Yeah this wasn't my best! Tried to run through as clearly as I could but it's a complicated topic

  • @jamesluc6506
    @jamesluc6506 Год назад +2

    Hi, sir! Thanks for the great content. I am wondering how does two junctions being both part of a same junction (because they yield the same equation) matter when we solve the problem? Thank you

  • @abeddar9843
    @abeddar9843 3 года назад +6

    Oh my god... I just had a test abt this 2 days ago and I failed it

  • @juniorcyans2988
    @juniorcyans2988 11 месяцев назад +1

    After I watched this video I realized I misunderstood the Kirchhoff’s Laws😅 Thank you very much!

  • @prisonmike7198
    @prisonmike7198 3 года назад +2

    you are amazing pal

  • @kevinmaguire2707
    @kevinmaguire2707 5 месяцев назад

    you said something wrong at 9:06 it should be I2 time R2 but you said I1 time R1. also for the same part, for V2, you said R3 times the second current where it should have been the second resistor. Beside that, this has been one of the most helpful video I have seen on Kirchhoff's law.

  • @markkennedy9767
    @markkennedy9767 Год назад

    Can you comment on what determines our choice of loops should be in a given circuit generally. In particular, should no loop be the combination of any of the other loops chosen. For example, would choosing the outer loop also here at 5:10 just yield the same information as the two inner loops.
    Also, can you give any intuition whether Kirchoff rules always lead to a solution: ie that we always get as many independent equations as variables. Thanks.

  • @arwa3370
    @arwa3370 Год назад

    how did you find the first current in the last question?

  • @kianparikh8129
    @kianparikh8129 Год назад

    make hl videos also

  • @fabricefab3518
    @fabricefab3518 Год назад

    Life saver

  • @sithilliyanage3676
    @sithilliyanage3676 2 года назад

    Isn't I0 at 9:00 equal to 0.0525 ?

    • @fionnuala7042
      @fionnuala7042 Год назад +1

      Find I3 first. It turns out to be negative (I3= -0.0375). Then find I2 = 0.015.So when plugging that back into the JA equation
      JA: I1 -I2-I3=0 becomes
      I1-0.015-(-0.0375)=0,
      I1= -0.0375+0.015
      I1= -0.0225