Do you have to do a ECM tune? I heard you have to do a Tune even if you just do an H-Pipe and High Flow Exhaust. Also Why can you Not have High Flow headers with a Supercharger?
It depends on the vehicle itself. You'll find that most modern vehicles will require tuning if anything effects what the sensors are measuring. With a supercharger, you'll definitely need a calibration because of the increased airflow and fuel demand from adding forced induction.
Dyno numbers on the stock engine are way low. I’ve got a 2007 Tundra with 5.7 and it is hands down the quickest truck I’ve ever had. Aren’t the power #’s really close to 400 hp and torque
2007-2021 Stock tundra makes 300-310 rwhp. They’re one of the slowest trucks in today’s standards. A 5.0 with e85 tune would outrun a supercharged tundra.
@@bradmo9281 You’r not very bright, are you? A whipple 2.9 Tundra is 490rwhp. A much newer F150 with the 5.0 even with a E85 tune is 400rwhp, and that is if you get the blend correct. E85 just sucks and more of a hassle as each station has varying amounts. So, a supercharged Tundra will destroy a 5.0. Also, the F150 is still just a Ford, which is to say - falls apart.
@@esteemedenergy I’m plenty bright I’ve owned both of the trucks. Have you ever heard of a thing called power to weight ratio. Plus the 10 speed in the f150. My truck makes 458 rwhp with just a simple bolt mustang manifold e85 and off road y-pipe. The tundras are great dependable trucks but are heavy and slow compared to the newer ones.
Will this pass emissions tests in California? Also, what MPG does this give the truck? If this was answered in the video, I apologize for asking, but the video will not play. Most likely an issue with my computer, not the video.
Wheel HP is a lot different than the 381 crank hp. Wheel HP is also dependent on tire size. The number to focus on is the delta between before and after.
We are particularly fond of Coyote engines as well. But for as mild and reliable as this set up is, it's a very healthy upgrade in performance for a daily driver!
@@Captndarty personally, it still doesn’t justify the cost to power ratio for that little gained for a $7800 kit + labor. I would of just enjoyed the vehicle as is.
@@Captndarty that’s funny. I have 2 project cars, one over 700whp and a FBO Coyote, a house an a truck. Economics isn’t my issue. It’s that a kit that barely makes 400whp is a waste of money, or the platform you are modding is a weak platform for power. Either way money don’t make you smart, especially when little is gained from spending it.
Can you do me , us the hugest favor and ask the owner of the Tundra what precise grille is that or provide a part number . Thank you
Wow, that is a low reading dyno.
I fail to see how 150 horses is worth $7600 just for the part. So not worth it to me
Dang I wish they had this for the Gen 1
Same can’t even change the cam’s
Do you have to do a ECM tune? I heard you have to do a Tune even if you just do an H-Pipe and High Flow Exhaust. Also Why can you Not have High Flow headers with a Supercharger?
It depends on the vehicle itself. You'll find that most modern vehicles will require tuning if anything effects what the sensors are measuring. With a supercharger, you'll definitely need a calibration because of the increased airflow and fuel demand from adding forced induction.
How much was labor cost of Install
Lol
They'll charge almost as much as the kit costs
Very nice!
Dyno numbers on the stock engine are way low. I’ve got a 2007 Tundra with 5.7 and it is hands down the quickest truck I’ve ever had. Aren’t the power #’s really close to 400 hp and torque
Big tires and 430 gears hurt numbers.
2007-2021 Stock tundra makes 300-310 rwhp. They’re one of the slowest trucks in today’s standards. A 5.0 with e85 tune would outrun a supercharged tundra.
@@bradmo9281 You’r not very bright, are you? A whipple 2.9 Tundra is 490rwhp. A much newer F150 with the 5.0 even with a E85 tune is 400rwhp, and that is if you get the blend correct. E85 just sucks and more of a hassle as each station has varying amounts. So, a supercharged Tundra will destroy a 5.0. Also, the F150 is still just a Ford, which is to say - falls apart.
@@esteemedenergy I’m plenty bright I’ve owned both of the trucks. Have you ever heard of a thing called power to weight ratio. Plus the 10 speed in the f150. My truck makes 458 rwhp with just a simple bolt mustang manifold e85 and off road y-pipe. The tundras are great dependable trucks but are heavy and slow compared to the newer ones.
@@esteemedenergy the tundra is a good truck but it seems cars aren’t your thing. The coyote has proven to be beyond durable.
What grille is that???
Trd Sport grill
@@raymondgoad9356No it isnt , do you see an emblem in the center ?
Will this pass emissions tests in California? Also, what MPG does this give the truck? If this was answered in the video, I apologize for asking, but the video will not play. Most likely an issue with my computer, not the video.
Yes we have a carb legal kit option for you, we have one in stock and would like to make you a great deal on it. Sales@vmpperformance.com
That's crazy, just a good exhaust and cold air will produce that on a stock engine, the math ain't mathin.
Wheel HP is a lot different than the 381 crank hp. Wheel HP is also dependent on tire size. The number to focus on is the delta between before and after.
TVS2650 BETTER MAGNUSON SC FOR ME
8k to supercharge is just too much.
This is the price of admission now unfortunately.
See if you can get a set of headers and E85 tune. $2k and probably 50-60 whp
@@Highlander1432 I given up on the tundra performance route . The truck is perfect as is. Might go old school 81 z28 . With a built 427 and 4 speed.
@cesarsaavedra3095
Good choice
Much more satisfying in a real muscle car!
I have 2 Camaros and they're a blast
The Power to Dollar ratio makes zero sense lmfao 🤣.
The Coyote is just superior to all engines these days !
We are particularly fond of Coyote engines as well. But for as mild and reliable as this set up is, it's a very healthy upgrade in performance for a daily driver!
@@VMPPerformanceTV 👍
Except the rest of the Ford just falls part - all the time. This is why the F150 is ranked so poorly in every reliability study.
@@esteemedenergy You've had your doody pushed in by a Ford haven't you... 😂😂😂😂😂
And in the rest of the world where it really matters the LS dominates.
The numbers were embarrassing, I’m sorry.
It's important to keep in mind the goals and usage of the vehicle. This kit is just a 7 psi kit meant for a moderate upgrade/increase in performance.
Rear wheel horsepower not at the crank. Probably 550 squared at the crank.
@@Captndarty personally, it still doesn’t justify the cost to power ratio for that little gained for a $7800 kit + labor. I would of just enjoyed the vehicle as is.
@@Andreallen4 Well that’s your economics. 44% increase in power is pretty damn good and cheaper than getting into a brand new boosted vehicle
@@Captndarty that’s funny. I have 2 project cars, one over 700whp and a FBO Coyote, a house an a truck. Economics isn’t my issue. It’s that a kit that barely makes 400whp is a waste of money, or the platform you are modding is a weak platform for power. Either way money don’t make you smart, especially when little is gained from spending it.