Trident 2 the most lethal system on the planet,1st strike capability,10 mins delivery and hidden under the sea,Mirved,able to kill a silo with 1 warhead.....no equal.
@@timothychung4811hypersonic weapons don’t mean anything when talking nuclear weapons. The nuclear missile on average travels at MACH 26, and will arrive at its destination within say 30 minutes. In the end everyone dies.
Actually Russia no longer maintains the Soviet Union Triad. As they did not have the resources to up keep this Triad along with their military after the fall of the Soviet Union. They did manage to keep parts of it except much of that has deteriorated after 40 years and leaves them with a limited strike cape ability. This could intern be far more destructive to Russia as if they ever tried to launch a nuclear first strike the NATO pack would unleash their predetermined payloads reducing Russia to a pile of charcoal. Russia has been attempting to intimidate other nation for years as they have lost their power. So they had resorted to a paper military which now has been exposed by the Ukrainians repelling the Russia invaders from their homes. Putin then exposed their lack of a ballistic launch vehicle by having to make numerous attempts at a demonstration which ended in the destruction of their launch facility.
The game has moved on so that maybe 20% to 50% of the threat can be destroyed. The game hasn’t moved on anywhere near enough that the threat is anywhere near removed. It’s pointless shooting down a nuclear warheaded ICBM aimed at a city-sized target on its final descent (eg by an Iron Dome type of system) as it’ll either explode in the air at altitude over the target, or else still fall to ground near the target. Only a space-based system (as proposed by Reagan back in the 80s but still way too expensive/ambitious even today) could theoretically be quite effective - but even if 10% of missiles get through its game over…
The nuclear subs that Russia was so proud of has shown them selves to be vulnerable to deteriorating munitions as they lost at least 1 submarine to a peroxide torpedo that leaked because of old age as they were 40 years old Soviet Union ordinance. There is also the fact that the Russian fleet is monitored very carefully. Any attempt at deployment of a nuclear weapon would call for the immediate destruction of that vehicle before an attempted launch could occur which would also bring about the destruction of every other vehicle under surveillance. This is not new technology the US has had these capabilities for most 20 years now the USA even though it was aware of the Russians lack of capable nuclear triad continued work on every paper claim the Russians advanced and not just built deterrent for that but for scenarios Russia had not even though of. Now Russia may have been pulling off the largest fraud however Ukraine has proven Russia to be inept. I do not know why some nations are falling for the ploy of Russian claims. I like to think they are just down playing the situation, however innocent Ukrainians are dying while nation hold back at a thing that they must do eventually why wait till so many have died before they act. Give Ukraine everything they need before they need it and then back them up with boots on the ground stop nit picking this war every time politicians are involved in war lives are lost unnecessarily.
India does have a nuclear Triad but not as sophisticated like the USA or Russia does. India can deliver nuclear weapons by air with their Jaguars, Mirage 2000s and Rafael Jets. By sea with their nuclear powered SSBNs, INS Arihant and INS Arighart. By land with their ICBMs, Agni 3, 4, & 5.
Trident 2 the most lethal system on the planet,1st strike capability,10 mins delivery and hidden under the sea,Mirved,able to kill a silo with 1 warhead.....no equal.
I don't think it's more lethal than the RS 28 Sarmat
America has nothing to challenge the Chinese or Russian hypersonics.
Hahaha
Nothing you know about
@@timothychung4811hypersonic weapons don’t mean anything when talking nuclear weapons. The nuclear missile on average travels at MACH 26, and will arrive at its destination within say 30 minutes. In the end everyone dies.
Well hope the two adversaries have a way of eliminating the others nuclear threats.....
Actually Russia no longer maintains the Soviet Union Triad. As they did not have the resources to up keep this Triad along with their military after the fall of the Soviet Union. They did manage to keep parts of it except much of that has deteriorated after 40 years and leaves them with a limited strike cape ability. This could intern be far more destructive to Russia as if they ever tried to launch a nuclear first strike the NATO pack would unleash their predetermined payloads reducing Russia to a pile of charcoal. Russia has been attempting to intimidate other nation for years as they have lost their power. So they had resorted to a paper military which now has been exposed by the Ukrainians repelling the Russia invaders from their homes. Putin then exposed their lack of a ballistic launch vehicle by having to make numerous attempts at a demonstration which ended in the destruction of their launch facility.
Very informative. The narration is excellent. Thank you for making these fascinating videos 🙏
Glad you enjoyed it!
Having nukes in space will be Quad-ad.
In terms of delivery , no country is better that Russia and USA
Uk has triad. I never knew India did though.
Is it me or does it seem wrong to not have a B-52 with a face on it?
The game has moved on... There are missiles to deal with land and air launches, and submarines are now detectable...
The game has moved on so that maybe 20% to 50% of the threat can be destroyed. The game hasn’t moved on anywhere near enough that the threat is anywhere near removed. It’s pointless shooting down a nuclear warheaded ICBM aimed at a city-sized target on its final descent (eg by an Iron Dome type of system) as it’ll either explode in the air at altitude over the target, or else still fall to ground near the target. Only a space-based system (as proposed by Reagan back in the 80s but still way too expensive/ambitious even today) could theoretically be quite effective - but even if 10% of missiles get through its game over…
@@neilturner6749Exactly
No 4th?
The nuclear subs that Russia was so proud of has shown them selves to be vulnerable to deteriorating munitions as they lost at least 1 submarine to a peroxide torpedo that leaked because of old age as they were 40 years old Soviet Union ordinance. There is also the fact that the Russian fleet is monitored very carefully. Any attempt at deployment of a nuclear weapon would call for the immediate destruction of that vehicle before an attempted launch could occur which would also bring about the destruction of every other vehicle under surveillance. This is not new technology the US has had these capabilities for most 20 years now the USA even though it was aware of the Russians lack of capable nuclear triad continued work on every paper claim the Russians advanced and not just built deterrent for that but for scenarios Russia had not even though of. Now Russia may have been pulling off the largest fraud however Ukraine has proven Russia to be inept. I do not know why some nations are falling for the ploy of Russian claims. I like to think they are just down playing the situation, however innocent Ukrainians are dying while nation hold back at a thing that they must do eventually why wait till so many have died before they act. Give Ukraine everything they need before they need it and then back them up with boots on the ground stop nit picking this war every time politicians are involved in war lives are lost unnecessarily.
Armed space satellites.
💪💪💪💪🫶🫶🫶👌👌👌🔥🔥🔥
I think Indian person make this channel since India do not have true nuclear bomber nor submarine fleet with ICBM.
UK not India is the 4th
Haha another drunk pommy
Russia does not have atomic bomb
India does not have triad.
India does have a nuclear Triad but not as sophisticated like the USA or Russia does. India can deliver nuclear weapons by air with their Jaguars, Mirage 2000s and Rafael Jets. By sea with their nuclear powered SSBNs, INS Arihant and INS Arighart. By land with their ICBMs, Agni 3, 4, & 5.
SLBMs and not SSBMs
Ok
Of course Mr Chung hung king kong hong kong ding dong ping pong u r so wrong
@KK-tc6xq What are you doing with your curry?