Hey everyone, welcome to the channel! First of all, I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to each and every one of you for taking the time to watch this video. Your support means the world to me, and I'm truly excited to embark on this journey of sharing aviation content with you all. I just want to take a moment to say that I'm completely new to the world of RUclips, scriptwriting, and video editing. This is a learning experience for me, and I'm eager to improve with every video I create. So, your feedback is incredibly valuable to me. I'd love to hear your thoughts on various aspects of the video. Did you find the script engaging and informative? Did the voice-over narration resonate well with the content? How about the visuals and video editing? Was the music a good fit for the video's theme? Your opinions will help me understand what works best and where I can make improvements. I want to create aviation content that truly captivates and enriches your experience. So, please don't hesitate to leave your constructive feedback in the comments section. Whether you have suggestions, ideas, or even topics you'd like me to cover in future videos, I'm all ears! Once again, thank you for joining me on this exciting adventure. Your support and input are what drives me to create better content each time. Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe, and I'll see you in the next video!
The A350-1000 is indeed an impressive aircraft, and Qantas' choice for Project Sunrise showcases its capabilities as the "ultimate long-range aircraft." The A380 and A350 have unique strengths, and it's exciting to see the aviation industry evolve with such remarkable options. Each aircraft brings something special to the table, and it's great to see how they contribute to enhancing air travel for passengers worldwide.
The A350 would probably still be the go-to for many airliners and it will depend on whether boeing can stick to their deadlines. I think it will take a few years for the 777x to become a staple in the fleets of airliners. I think both of these will serve us for the next few decades
I can't help but wonder if these aircraft are becoming excessively large and costly to operate. The advancements in technology are impressive, but the escalating costs and sizes certainly raise some questions about sustainability in the long run. As these aircraft continue to grow in size and cost, could this trend potentially make air travel less affordable for the average passenger?
Most airlines are operating at razor thin profit margins. The breakeven is often at 80+%. And with covid impacting long haul travel, I think it will take some time to make air travel cheaper. The A380 was a great attempt at reducing costs of long haul travel, but that came with a host of new challenges.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! You raise a valid point about the size and operating costs of modern aircraft. As technology evolves, aircraft have indeed become more sophisticated and efficient, allowing for impressive advancements in performance and passenger experience. It's true that larger aircraft can come with higher operating costs, but they also offer significant benefits, such as increased capacity and fuel efficiency. The industry constantly strives to balance these factors to ensure sustainability and affordability in the long run. While some aircraft have grown in size, airlines carefully consider the needs of their routes and passenger demand before adding new planes to their fleet. Additionally, ongoing research and development in aerospace engineering aim to improve fuel efficiency and reduce environmental impact. As for air travel affordability, it's a concern that the industry takes seriously. The competition among airlines and the advancement of technology have helped keep airfares relatively affordable for many passengers. Moreover, airlines often offer a range of ticket options to cater to different budgets. Ultimately, the aviation industry is committed to making air travel accessible and sustainable for a broader audience. Continuous innovation, careful planning, and responsible practices are essential to ensure that air travel remains both affordable and environmentally responsible.
There are a lot of operational reasons why airlines go with the a350. Apart from it being flown already. First up no airport issues due not having folding wings. One issues with those and you are stuck on the taxiway. Crew trains due to commonality with the a330 if airlines opt to have combined crews.
While I really enjoy flying Boeing, I never like liked the 777, unlike the 787 which really is a dream, at least in biz class. Given the stats for fuel consumption, reputation and delivery reliability Airbus A350 has a solid head start against the 777-X, it seems logical the A350 will prevail. Personally, price matters, but I always look are the aircraft type being used
From what I can find about the 777x, It looks like it may be more expensive than the A350. I think we are all looking forward to taking a flight in the 777x.
There's a few mistakes in this video: 1. You often show an A330 claiming it's an A350 2. The A350 usually comes with a 3-3-3 economy seat configuration, not 3-4-3.
a 350 is now being used by airlines for years and yes 777X is much better is paper but until 777X rolls out from production and serve paying passengers then will know what is better but today a350 is better. just my opinion
I think any aircraft with 400-plus seats is just too big. How often can airlines (unless they are Emirates) fill up planes of that size? Forget about efficiency if the plane is only 70 to 80% full.
3-4-3 on an a350 is a nightmare. The seats would be 16.5 inches wide in economy. I'm happy airbus made their a350 optimized for 3-3-3 at 18inch seat width.
@@amirtak9886Correct and in the case of A350-1041s the 3-4-3 PR Fiesta Class simply loses out to QF & CX Oneworld Alliance A350-1041s which are 3-3-3 in economy class. The 3-3-3 A35K vs 3-4-3 A35K configuration is easily seen on HKG-MNL
The B777-8 has not yet found its market. Except for the cargo version. I hope Boeing will not face the same situation as Airbus with the A380...Emirates was the leading airline for that program too..
A380 is also technically can be in its own league since it was Higher capacity than 747-8, but the real question is, is the market big enough for the "in its own league" to be actually turning into any real-life advantage. Considering that the Big 3 US carrier ordered only 787-sized widebody and Surrendered plans to introduce any 777-300 sized new airplanes in the coming future.
What is with the every airline wants airbus stuff? That is false. For example you have got the lowcost airlines like southwest, spirit, Ryanair, easyJet, etc. they can't operate the a350 because it doesn't fit their network. Then you got the airlines like Alaska airlines Alaska Airlines are in the middle of getting rid of airbus aircraft so it is unlikely that they will order the a350. Its true that a lot of airlines want the a350 but not EVERY airline wants it.
Really good question to ask. But mines answer to this question should be, the US carrier knows they cannot compete with carriers from Overseas on international routes (Not counting ME3 which you may ask how many fuel subsidies they got, Or East Asian Carriers which they have hardworking employees with wage half of USA - Taiwan average salary should be less than half of USA, Even Europe carrier could be better than them), they are hurdled by Strong Labour Union and High price index as US base carrier, so they give up hope of dominating any Major city route pairs(LHR-JFK, ICN-SFO) and focus more on flying direct from US to secondary city pairs which they are untouched by Foreign carriers.
Thank you for pointing that out, I admit, I dropped the ball on that one. Lesson learnt :-) Airbus A350-900: 8,100 nautical miles (14,300 kilometers) Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range): 9,700 nautical miles (17,964 kilometers) Airbus A350-1000: 8,700 nautical miles (16,112 kilometers) I really appreciate you pointing this out. Thank you once again.
@@AviationRepublic also one more thing the Airbus 350-1000 which Qantas has ordered for their project sunrise has additional fuel tanks giving them more range that helps to operate the 20+ hour nonstop flights from Sydney or Melbourne to New York or London.
If you are referring to the range, yes, This was a mistake on my part: Airbus A350-900: 8,100 nautical miles (14,300 kilometers) Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range): 9,700 nautical miles (17,964 kilometers) Airbus A350-1000: 8,700 nautical miles (16,112 kilometers)
Here we go again. Another attempt to get views to say a lot about very little with no conclusion reached or any clarification of any of the points raised. Like comparing a cake against another cake. They are both cakes. But everyone knew that so why make an upload about cakes? Nothing better to do , I guess. But.... Very informative and good production standards. All I know is that we need a healthy Boeing. I want more info about that famous company's chances of survival for the future, please Why are the Airbus planes so much cheaper? Government subsidies? Is that fair? Thank you.
Thank you for your comment. I have plans to create some videos along the lines you mentioned, i.e. the chances of Boeing surviving, the rising fortunes of Airbus etc. I just wish I had more time to write and research the topics, not enough hours in the day. :-) One day, maybe.
That's not what the stats say!😅 we can't really on passenger experience since the 777x is not yet on production. A350 is better in fuel consumption and cost of production/aircraft.
![KAYTRANADA - Witchy (feat. Childish Gambino) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jGK3YVmGZ3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey everyone, welcome to the channel! First of all, I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to each and every one of you for taking the time to watch this video. Your support means the world to me, and I'm truly excited to embark on this journey of sharing aviation content with you all.
I just want to take a moment to say that I'm completely new to the world of RUclips, scriptwriting, and video editing. This is a learning experience for me, and I'm eager to improve with every video I create. So, your feedback is incredibly valuable to me.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on various aspects of the video. Did you find the script engaging and informative? Did the voice-over narration resonate well with the content? How about the visuals and video editing? Was the music a good fit for the video's theme? Your opinions will help me understand what works best and where I can make improvements.
I want to create aviation content that truly captivates and enriches your experience. So, please don't hesitate to leave your constructive feedback in the comments section. Whether you have suggestions, ideas, or even topics you'd like me to cover in future videos, I'm all ears!
Once again, thank you for joining me on this exciting adventure. Your support and input are what drives me to create better content each time. Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe, and I'll see you in the next video!
A350 is better. Qantas chose the a350-1000 for Project Sunrise describing it as "the ultimate long range aircraft"
It will be very interesting when the 777x if finally ready
No doubt it too will be a great aircraft.
The A350-1000 is indeed an impressive aircraft, and Qantas' choice for Project Sunrise showcases its capabilities as the "ultimate long-range aircraft." The A380 and A350 have unique strengths, and it's exciting to see the aviation industry evolve with such remarkable options. Each aircraft brings something special to the table, and it's great to see how they contribute to enhancing air travel for passengers worldwide.
The airbus a350 is such a beautiful machine.
The A350 is indeed a beautiful aircraft.
The A350 would probably still be the go-to for many airliners and it will depend on whether boeing can stick to their deadlines.
I think it will take a few years for the 777x to become a staple in the fleets of airliners.
I think both of these will serve us for the next few decades
Excellent presentation of the A350’s and the B777X👌
Glad you enjoyed it
I can't help but wonder if these aircraft are becoming excessively large and costly to operate. The advancements in technology are impressive, but the escalating costs and sizes certainly raise some questions about sustainability in the long run. As these aircraft continue to grow in size and cost, could this trend potentially make air travel less affordable for the average passenger?
Most airlines are operating at razor thin profit margins. The breakeven is often at 80+%. And with covid impacting long haul travel, I think it will take some time to make air travel cheaper.
The A380 was a great attempt at reducing costs of long haul travel, but that came with a host of new challenges.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! You raise a valid point about the size and operating costs of modern aircraft. As technology evolves, aircraft have indeed become more sophisticated and efficient, allowing for impressive advancements in performance and passenger experience.
It's true that larger aircraft can come with higher operating costs, but they also offer significant benefits, such as increased capacity and fuel efficiency. The industry constantly strives to balance these factors to ensure sustainability and affordability in the long run.
While some aircraft have grown in size, airlines carefully consider the needs of their routes and passenger demand before adding new planes to their fleet. Additionally, ongoing research and development in aerospace engineering aim to improve fuel efficiency and reduce environmental impact.
As for air travel affordability, it's a concern that the industry takes seriously. The competition among airlines and the advancement of technology have helped keep airfares relatively affordable for many passengers. Moreover, airlines often offer a range of ticket options to cater to different budgets.
Ultimately, the aviation industry is committed to making air travel accessible and sustainable for a broader audience. Continuous innovation, careful planning, and responsible practices are essential to ensure that air travel remains both affordable and environmentally responsible.
There are a lot of operational reasons why airlines go with the a350. Apart from it being flown already. First up no airport issues due not having folding wings. One issues with those and you are stuck on the taxiway. Crew trains due to commonality with the a330 if airlines opt to have combined crews.
Really interesting information thank you for sharing 😊
Thank you for watching; very much appreciated. I love making these videos, nice to watch during lunch break :-)
While I really enjoy flying Boeing, I never like liked the 777, unlike the 787 which really is a dream, at least in biz class. Given the stats for fuel consumption, reputation and delivery reliability Airbus A350 has a solid head start against the 777-X, it seems logical the A350 will prevail. Personally, price matters, but I always look are the aircraft type being used
From what I can find about the 777x, It looks like it may be more expensive than the A350. I think we are all looking forward to taking a flight in the 777x.
There's a few mistakes in this video:
1. You often show an A330 claiming it's an A350
2. The A350 usually comes with a 3-3-3 economy seat configuration, not 3-4-3.
Thank you for pointing out the error in aircraft type, I missed that one.
a 350 is now being used by airlines for years and yes 777X is much better is paper but until 777X rolls out from production and serve paying passengers then will know what is better but today a350 is better. just my opinion
Most of us aviation fans are waiting like kids for Christmas for the 777x to finally hit the flight line.
Still being said, 77W is still too good to be replaced, not much room for ordering A35K or 777X
Thank you for your comment, Joe.
Great video. Thank you.
Thank you, very kind of you. More videos to come. My aim is to post two videos per week at least.
I think any aircraft with 400-plus seats is just too big. How often can airlines (unless they are Emirates) fill up planes of that size? Forget about efficiency if the plane is only 70 to 80% full.
That's a very valid question. How about the transatlantic flights?
The A330 usually has a 2-4-2 config so it's not really similar to the 350...
Nah , some a330s run 3-3-3 but likewise some a350s run 3-4-3
You can actually do 3-4-3 on A350-1000 and its seen on PR Fiesta class A350-1000. Which would make it like a B777-x in the same configuration.
3-4-3 on an a350 is a nightmare. The seats would be 16.5 inches wide in economy. I'm happy airbus made their a350 optimized for 3-3-3 at 18inch seat width.
@@amirtak9886Correct and in the case of A350-1041s the 3-4-3 PR Fiesta Class simply loses out to QF & CX Oneworld Alliance A350-1041s which are 3-3-3 in economy class. The 3-3-3 A35K vs 3-4-3 A35K configuration is easily seen on HKG-MNL
This is the third model airbus has developed to compete with the B777.. let's see which is better between the A350 and the B777 once it starts flying
It's going to interesting to find out.
Will the price tag of the B777-9 be worth for many airlines? Time will tell....
Time will tell
The A350-900 competes with the 787-10.
The A350-1000 competes with the 777-8X.
The 777-9X is in it's own league.
The B777-8 has not yet found its market. Except for the cargo version. I hope Boeing will not face the same situation as Airbus with the A380...Emirates was the leading airline for that program too..
A380 is also technically can be in its own league since it was Higher capacity than 747-8, but the real question is, is the market big enough for the "in its own league" to be actually turning into any real-life advantage. Considering that the Big 3 US carrier ordered only 787-sized widebody and Surrendered plans to introduce any 777-300 sized new airplanes in the coming future.
A350-2000 Regional is needed for Cathay
I agree totally with this video.
Thank you for watching and commenting.
A300 hundred fifty .... please 😱.🤖🤖
I may have been dozing off when I wrote that. Thank you for pointing it out. Much appreciated.
What is with the every airline wants airbus stuff? That is false. For example you have got the lowcost airlines like southwest, spirit, Ryanair, easyJet, etc. they can't operate the a350 because it doesn't fit their network. Then you got the airlines like Alaska airlines Alaska Airlines are in the middle of getting rid of airbus aircraft so it is unlikely that they will order the a350. Its true that a lot of airlines want the a350 but not EVERY airline wants it.
I understand where you are coming from. But I really do appreciate your comment.
One problem with this take. You metioned low cost carriers that operated narrowbody aircraft. Why bring up widebodies if yk they wouldnt order any
Also yes airlines like alaska and others are getting rid of airbus for fleet commonality bc its cheaper to do and saves airlines in training cost
@@_.tbx10 thats my point he said EVERY airline
There is a question : Why The American Companies don't want the 777-X and place more order for 787-9 and 787-10?
Really good question to ask. But mines answer to this question should be, the US carrier knows they cannot compete with carriers from Overseas on international routes (Not counting ME3 which you may ask how many fuel subsidies they got, Or East Asian Carriers which they have hardworking employees with wage half of USA - Taiwan average salary should be less than half of USA, Even Europe carrier could be better than them), they are hurdled by Strong Labour Union and High price index as US base carrier, so they give up hope of dominating any Major city route pairs(LHR-JFK, ICN-SFO) and focus more on flying direct from US to secondary city pairs which they are untouched by Foreign carriers.
Great answer. Thank you for your comment, Joe
A350-1000 has 8700nm range
Thank you for pointing that out, I admit, I dropped the ball on that one. Lesson learnt :-)
Airbus A350-900: 8,100 nautical miles (14,300 kilometers)
Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range): 9,700 nautical miles (17,964 kilometers)
Airbus A350-1000: 8,700 nautical miles (16,112 kilometers)
I really appreciate you pointing this out. Thank you once again.
@@AviationRepublic also one more thing the Airbus 350-1000 which Qantas has ordered for their project sunrise has additional fuel tanks giving them more range that helps to operate the 20+ hour nonstop flights from Sydney or Melbourne to New York or London.
Thank you, noted for future videos.
@@AviationRepublic you're welcome. Keep up the good work. :)
Roger. wilco
7992 vs 7990 NM really ???????????????????
If you are referring to the range, yes, This was a mistake on my part:
Airbus A350-900: 8,100 nautical miles (14,300 kilometers)
Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range): 9,700 nautical miles (17,964 kilometers)
Airbus A350-1000: 8,700 nautical miles (16,112 kilometers)
Here we go again. Another attempt to get views to say a lot about very little with no conclusion reached or any clarification of any of the points raised.
Like comparing a cake against another cake.
They are both cakes.
But everyone knew that so why make an upload about cakes?
Nothing better to do , I guess.
But....
Very informative and good production standards.
All I know is that we need a healthy Boeing.
I want more info about that famous company's chances of survival for the future, please
Why are the Airbus planes so much cheaper? Government subsidies? Is that fair?
Thank you.
Thank you for your comment. I have plans to create some videos along the lines you mentioned, i.e. the chances of Boeing surviving, the rising fortunes of Airbus etc. I just wish I had more time to write and research the topics, not enough hours in the day. :-) One day, maybe.
The a 350 is cheaper more fuel efficient en just better
That is very true. Thank you for your comment, Joe
@@AviationRepublichow about waiting for the 777 x to enter service first before making that assumption
777X way better
No doubt, the 777x is destined to be an epic aircraft. Can't wait to take a flight in it.
That's not what the stats say!😅 we can't really on passenger experience since the 777x is not yet on production. A350 is better in fuel consumption and cost of production/aircraft.
I think everyone in the aviation community is waiting like kids at Christmas for the 777X to make it into service.
@@itsme-vw5yonot to metion way lighter than the 777x
777x is better not a350 boeing is and will be best aircraft manufacturer
It's going to be great when Boeing finally release the 777x. The 777x is going to be something special.
The a350 is a 100millions cheaper than 777x
777x is old design,only it's wings are of composite
Any airline in America is ordering 777x??
No every Airlins is rushing to the 350. Stop lieing.
I will improve as I make more videos. Thank you for your comment, Joe.
@@AviationRepublic your welcome joe.