15-10. I am not the fastest thinker. So the extra 10 secs per move is helpful sometimes. I think the game should never take more than an hour, and so 15-10 is good enough. I tried 10 minutes but that is not enough time.@@BottleOfCoke
@@eliasseoane7663not necessarily. I’m a 400 and have beaten 700+ and even have a few games over 80-90% accuracy with over 50 moves. Only been playing chess for a month as well.
Bro are you gonna think that was a legit 400 keeping up with Anna cramling up until the endgame, and thinking about threatening pawns and making the king active in the endgame? Lmao
A 400 knows how to move a piece and probably 3 moves of Italian theory. I’m 1850 and the pawn sacrifice is insane even at my level tho, especially with 5 sec for calculating
That's weird... When I first played chess, I would always try to get my rook out first, since in my head, the rook was the strongest piece. And I always played against people that were able to think ahead at least 3 moves with every single piece, where I had no idea about basic strategies, like castling and reconnaissance.
Pretty sure the point of the "banned" opening is to, yes - sacrifice, but to also play extremely aggressive and force opponent into a negative position in which one of their rooks simply never gets to play.
I tried it many times. Also the cow opening. There is also the A pawn run. One of my opponents gave me a win for shifting queen/king in the beginning. A guy raged about my Ke8->f7.
@@shankrl1 Are you playing against 2100s? Do you frequently have 2 minutes on the clock left in a blitz game while your 2100 opponent has seconds left?
I started 3 months ago my accounts was like in 200 elo because I created it last year and didnt know a thing about chess, then I started watching vids and tutorials for like a week and started climbing, and it took me almost a month to get out of 300-400 elo that range between 300-500 was hell, now I'm 800 but it is still funny to me that I climbed from 500 to 800 in 2 weeks when it took 2 months from 200 to 500
You enable them in settings and right click with the mouse and drag to the squares you want to point to. You can only do it on the computer and not on mobile though.
I'm stuck at about ~300 elo blitz, because even though my opening and mid games are strong, I keep blundering endgames. Only in Blitz, me elo for rapid and daily is ~1000
I am new to chess and play against these "300" players a lot. Really infuriating as either they play with accuracies in the 90% and are geniuses or they are cheaters....
when you create a new account you get an 800 rating. By the time you learn to play better, you're already at 400~600. The ratings are very messed up below 800. you can either find a very weak opponent or a very strong one. There is no consistency.
"is this how 3 and 400s play?" yes, we have great openings, and then throw it away in the mid or late. also, "noob" can be used ironically when you're actually good at the game. i feel like people with that in their name can be 50/50 good or bad.
Wait ive been playin pawn rook opening since i was a kid im 30 now, grsnted i dont play much chess anymore but it was always the easyest way for me to aply early pressure because im inpatiant
Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a good trade? Sacrificing a rook which generally don't do much in the first half of a game for a piece that's active throughout and essential to any opening on turn two. Seems like a smart sacrifice to my nooby eyes.
You put "noob" in your name as a mind game, make folks think you're new and just got to your score through luck, maybe they'll go easy on you, or be more likely to slip up. It's like the whole "Oh I haven't played this in so long, I'm rusty af" and then you score a first minute three-pointer in Basketball, or a hole in one at golf. Or hit a homerun.
Calling yourself a noob is cool cause selfdeprecation is the hip thing to do these days. And you´re allowed to say that everything sucks as long as you acknowledge that you do as well. So there´s that XD
I Think the bullet rating is higher if a higher rated player never really played bullet. Try to go and see their statistic. Of the good players, maybe their Daily or rapid games are much higher rated
He did not cheat, I checked his account, in the game his accuracy was 78.4 and Anna's as 83.2, (both not too high to say cheat at all), he has 36 wins,10 draw, 26 loses. Low rating does not mean a bad player.
I just watched the game review on cheescom and Anna made several mistakes. In the pawn endgame Anna was +6, and she made a mistake so the position gets equalized. And then you can see how his opponent let the queens changed so he ended it with a losing endgame position. If you think he was cheating you don't know nothing bout chess. I'm 2050 and I doubt that you are 2300 because of your comment
It's actually hard for alot of us in the 3 digits to gain elo because everyone is getting better all the time. I can't stay above 600 at all. The ones that we would see on Gothams channel are outliers or possibly attention seekers. I never see players that play stupidly in my games
Great demonstration of wrong the system is in online chess. Chess Master had a system where you never lost points playing anyone over 200 elo more than you. You'd actually gain points for playing a Grand Master and didn't need a second account win or lose. If the GM lost or Draw, they lost points but not a weaker player. Every person at the 300 level is harder than playing a 2000 rated player. I set my account to play anyone and do better against higher rated players than the lower. lol I'm over 1200 in 10 minutes but the 3 minute stuff I'm under 300 and used to be over 600. lol Had 3 people in a row beat me the same way because I kept playing a bad opening and I thought I was playing a bot because it was exactly the same lines they used. I have the games to prove it.
I don't play but I know someone who plays as much as you and doesn't remember all the counter moves and takes for ever to process their moves.... most likely can't develop much more your Cute and a Great Ambassador for the Game... Anna Faster Please
@@XboxOnePwns bro im over 2000 elo and i'd never made the move Qc4 in such position (16:24) he lose at the spot. If he was cheating clearly he won't make that move. Only people with no creativity can think he's a cheater. He made a very good move with f6+ but that's all. The rest of the game is full of mistakes. Starting of not capturing the Anna's rook on the first two moves LOOOOL
@@FutbolDePasilloI am 900 elo but that 400 would smoke most of the players in 900 range. He's not using engine by the looks of it but he's most likely a smurf (a player who intentionally keeps his rating low to play weaker players), he seems higher rated than 1000 atleast.
Fun Anna! But with all the fun I've had, I think you'd agree that chess is an international sport of sorts. I think so. It is international and the mind is so important. Hence, because I feel so guilty of this "guilty pleasure" I get when I spend time avoiding other important things is that I would ask, please, everyone of Cramling's Crowd, Cramling's team, that you subscribe to Anna of Ukraine. Can't wait for the next video.
Isn't it funny how people think they are unbeatable so they get other people banned? Kramnic and Naradidtsky... How could he beat ME?!! He must be a cheater! Then there's me, Why can't I get my rating above 1600 on lichess. You don't need to cheat to beat me... LMAO.
Also known as the "notice me Kramnik" opening
The Banned Opening is a "rook"ie move. Credit to dads for this joke. 😂
Can you explain the joke please?
Det är uppenbart att du verkligen gillar schack OCH det är även riktigt kul att se din entusiasm, du berättar bra!
2:30 " 300 Elo is quite low, I mean it's very low"
my 270 Elo account...
@JeanFoutre-yi5us I truly am 😂
I once reached 475 and it went downhill from there.
Mostly because Johnny is Walking too fast sometimes.
@@bertjesklotepino 😂
@@bertjesklotepinoWhat time format are you playing?
15-10.
I am not the fastest thinker.
So the extra 10 secs per move is helpful sometimes.
I think the game should never take more than an hour, and so 15-10 is good enough.
I tried 10 minutes but that is not enough time.@@BottleOfCoke
I love how humble and human she is.
The way she’s calculating against 300s💀
They were not your average 300s tbf 😂
Bro a 400 found a brilliant move with 5 sec calculation tho 💀
That 400 was very clearly smurfing
Its not a normal position though
@@eliasseoane7663not necessarily. I’m a 400 and have beaten 700+ and even have a few games over 80-90% accuracy with over 50 moves. Only been playing chess for a month as well.
The 9th crew mate thing is probably something you are embarrassed but proud of at the same time, and I like that 😊
16:05 gm400😂
"How did the 400 find this move?!?" Anna, don't go down that road.
Bro are you gonna think that was a legit 400 keeping up with Anna cramling up until the endgame, and thinking about threatening pawns and making the king active in the endgame? Lmao
@@mitigamespro8757 People in comments think that was legit, that's completely insane.
@@mitigamespro8757 you think I said all of that, do ya? Interesting
A 400 knows how to move a piece and probably 3 moves of Italian theory. I’m 1850 and the pawn sacrifice is insane even at my level tho, especially with 5 sec for calculating
Totally agree. This was clearly a smurf.
Watching you play and laugh is a joy in and of itself !
Aw that's so lovely that she cares about people calling themselves a noob and going that deep instead of considering its a joke
17:07
"Elo 300 is quite low" *bows my head in shame*
30 wins in a row? Interesting...
Kramnik is comming for you next!!!
I mean you joke, but he went after hikaru for winning a dozen games in a row against someone he outrated by 500 points...
@@andrewbloom7694 I guess that's why he said this. He was joking by referring to this exact story.
That's weird...
When I first played chess, I would always try to get my rook out first, since in my head, the rook was the strongest piece.
And I always played against people that were able to think ahead at least 3 moves with every single piece, where I had no idea about basic strategies, like castling and reconnaissance.
Me and 24 other "Clash of Clans" are still awai your orders Princess Cramling 😅
31 in a row is excellent. As is defeating Margitt and Godrick (if those are the 2 you spoke of) for a non-Souls gamer.
Pretty sure the point of the "banned" opening is to, yes - sacrifice, but to also play extremely aggressive and force opponent into a negative position in which one of their rooks simply never gets to play.
16:46 Why did the timer restart and the rating jump after the second game?
I tried it many times. Also the cow opening. There is also the A pawn run. One of my opponents gave me a win for shifting queen/king in the beginning. A guy raged about my Ke8->f7.
Yes, 300 Elo plays like that
lol what. No they don't. He played 78% accuracy and almost flagged a 2100. There's no way that game was legit.
@@Romans8-9I’m 438 and play 78% accuracy often, that’s not high?
@@shankrl1 Are you playing against 2100s? Do you frequently have 2 minutes on the clock left in a blitz game while your 2100 opponent has seconds left?
@@Romans8-9 man, he wasn't cheating, if he was cheating he didnt lose by checkmate. Simply maybe this was a new account, and he's actually around 1700
@@Romans8-9 They do from what I experienced when I started an account at that rating.
Love your channel, I just went and looked up your top fail in "Among Us" lol that was great. :)
5:13 But Carlos Magsen plays like that just to disrespect his opponents even more.
No it’s because he didn’t want a draw and he was playing a very fast clock so he decided to play a more agressive but less accurate variation
I started 3 months ago my accounts was like in 200 elo because I created it last year and didnt know a thing about chess, then I started watching vids and tutorials for like a week and started climbing, and it took me almost a month to get out of 300-400 elo that range between 300-500 was hell, now I'm 800 but it is still funny to me that I climbed from 500 to 800 in 2 weeks when it took 2 months from 200 to 500
How do people make these arrows on the board?
You enable them in settings and right click with the mouse and drag to the squares you want to point to. You can only do it on the computer and not on mobile though.
I LOVE FUNNY STUFF!!!!
Cow opening go moo
Really fun would be a photo hack of Anna in an 80's hair-doo. Gotta love her hair as is.
the game with the 400 was a bit interesting. all i want to know is where the awesome music is from?
Anna's proof that you can be cute, goofy, and yet also highly intelligent all at the same time.
Movie Searching for Bobby Fischer, a similiar theme to the last game between Joel and Johnathon Poe.
The green Wirtual timer!
I'm stuck at about ~300 elo blitz, because even though my opening and mid games are strong, I keep blundering endgames. Only in Blitz, me elo for rapid and daily is ~1000
I just won two games in a row versus 2000 rating players on chess friends platform using the opening , it is so strong , gives you an edge
One thing I like about you being taking risk to learn what happens.
I am new to chess and play against these "300" players a lot. Really infuriating as either they play with accuracies in the 90% and are geniuses or they are cheaters....
The among us story is the most on brand story anyone has ever told 😅😂
Actually at 15:50 it was a drawn position 😂
yeah, he was cheating
They'll also be thinking you're strong for a 300 rated player.
By the way, if you lose, do you get your rating back as well?
when you create a new account you get an 800 rating. By the time you learn to play better, you're already at 400~600.
The ratings are very messed up below 800. you can either find a very weak opponent or a very strong one. There is no consistency.
"is this how 3 and 400s play?"
yes, we have great openings, and then throw it away in the mid or late.
also, "noob" can be used ironically when you're actually good at the game. i feel like people with that in their name can be 50/50 good or bad.
Wait ive been playin pawn rook opening since i was a kid im 30 now, grsnted i dont play much chess anymore but it was always the easyest way for me to aply early pressure because im inpatiant
Anna plays as 300, but shocked that 400 is not that bad as should be.
the 400 was cheating
Very unlikely.
Sometimes bad players make great moves by pure chance.
No, he wasn't that's the typical 400 behavior nowadays
@@usual_gamer6671 shut up loser
Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a good trade? Sacrificing a rook which generally don't do much in the first half of a game for a piece that's active throughout and essential to any opening on turn two. Seems like a smart sacrifice to my nooby eyes.
You put "noob" in your name as a mind game, make folks think you're new and just got to your score through luck, maybe they'll go easy on you, or be more likely to slip up.
It's like the whole "Oh I haven't played this in so long, I'm rusty af" and then you score a first minute three-pointer in Basketball, or a hole in one at golf. Or hit a homerun.
Your hair looks better.
She can sleep tonight now.
*Googles 9th crewemate
Oh my God. It's me. It's my opening. And you're right. They banned my account.!
Crazy Cool Game
Anna, such a. Sweetheart…
I like this comment
this is know as vig_sou opening
Calling yourself a noob is cool cause selfdeprecation is the hip thing to do these days. And you´re allowed to say that everything sucks as long as you acknowledge that you do as well. So there´s that XD
FINALLYYYYYY LETS GOOOO 🔥🔥🔥🔥
No premove? That's a real challenge
I Think the bullet rating is higher if a higher rated player never really played bullet. Try to go and see their statistic. Of the good players, maybe their Daily or rapid games are much higher rated
Reverse Psychologie worked if you don´t get feared =P
so why is this open banned? it's valid chess moves so whats the issue?
Imagine Anna beats Tyler in Leage 🤣
I would have never looked for "9th crewmate" video, if you never mentioned it. xD
Banned + Gambit= Bandit
Great vidio
this 400 so bad he couldnt win with engine
It's not engine. He's using his brain but he's a smurf
He did not cheat, I checked his account, in the game his accuracy was 78.4 and Anna's as 83.2, (both not too high to say cheat at all), he has 36 wins,10 draw, 26 loses. Low rating does not mean a bad player.
what the hell are you even about
Maybe they're all speed run accounts
You should move your mic to the other side, just noticed you tend to talk out of the opposite side that the mic is on.
I'm a 2300 Blitz player, I can beat a 400 without a Queen and Rook. That 400 was 100% cheating, especially after f6+
I mean he almost flagged her while he still had 2 mins. People in the comments actually legit think 400s play like that.
cheating? 😂😂😂😂😂 if he was cheating he didnt lose by check mate, man
I just watched the game review on cheescom and Anna made several mistakes. In the pawn endgame Anna was +6, and she made a mistake so the position gets equalized. And then you can see how his opponent let the queens changed so he ended it with a losing endgame position. If you think he was cheating you don't know nothing bout chess. I'm 2050 and I doubt that you are 2300 because of your comment
@@FutbolDePasillo You’re not 2050. I will beat you 10-0. Let’s play then, trashbag.
@@FutbolDePasillo give me your username
Q a1 is a move in this opening
ppl call themselves noob to make you overconfident (or because they really are noobs)
noob is a gaming term and is not negative, being called a NAB is the negative way of saying noob so if i wanted to insult you i would call you a nab
It's actually hard for alot of us in the 3 digits to gain elo because everyone is getting better all the time. I can't stay above 600 at all. The ones that we would see on Gothams channel are outliers or possibly attention seekers. I never see players that play stupidly in my games
Bruh thats probably because either you don't realize the blunders, or you don't play accurate enough to cause blunders
Can you beat higher elo players? Like 1000 1100 1200
Who are playing against? I'm from Aus and perhaps don't understand your accent 100% , lol, xx
do you get more elo for playing blitz games?
I swear there are a ton of 300-400 players cheating today...I'm stuck @ that elo and can't get past because they're "so good"...
The latest Avatar game is amazing.
Anna, the lowest ELO rating is eight hundred.
players do be like dat tho. thas why I'm stuck at 550
I’ve played counter strike? Savage.. BF4?
Ajjubhai invented this opening 😂😂
Are they all speedrunners :D
Great demonstration of wrong the system is in online chess. Chess Master had a system where you never lost points playing anyone over 200 elo more than you. You'd actually gain points for playing a Grand Master and didn't need a second account win or lose. If the GM lost or Draw, they lost points but not a weaker player. Every person at the 300 level is harder than playing a 2000 rated player. I set my account to play anyone and do better against higher rated players than the lower. lol I'm over 1200 in 10 minutes but the 3 minute stuff I'm under 300 and used to be over 600. lol Had 3 people in a row beat me the same way because I kept playing a bad opening and I thought I was playing a bot because it was exactly the same lines they used. I have the games to prove it.
your so Awesome.
Wtf is that music lol 😂
I wonder how many people just cheat when they play.
I don't play but I know someone who plays as much as you and doesn't remember all the counter moves and takes for ever to process their moves.... most likely can't develop much more your Cute and a Great Ambassador for the Game... Anna Faster Please
Maybe they just started their accounts?
nice
Why the US flag?
The music is weird, doesn't go at all with the content and is too loud.
i am so team anna. love her and her mum. sorry dad🙂
"they are so strong at 300 I'm Shocked!" Or maybe just your level went so down and now you think they are very strong
do you cheat? judging by your comments its look like you do. a 400 elo is never finding f6 especially in time trouble
@@XboxOnePwns bro im over 2000 elo and i'd never made the move Qc4 in such position (16:24) he lose at the spot. If he was cheating clearly he won't make that move. Only people with no creativity can think he's a cheater. He made a very good move with f6+ but that's all. The rest of the game is full of mistakes. Starting of not capturing the Anna's rook on the first two moves LOOOOL
@@FutbolDePasilloI am 900 elo but that 400 would smoke most of the players in 900 range. He's not using engine by the looks of it but he's most likely a smurf (a player who intentionally keeps his rating low to play weaker players), he seems higher rated than 1000 atleast.
@@adityasingh3963 I would agree with that
You sacrifice the exchange not the rook. Do better!
just admit it, Wirtual is your boyfriend
🤔
I was the 1k 👍!
Playing it the magnus was sucks, its brandon jackson opening not the magnus or gothamchess
8 inches was the real banned opening
Anna is mostly teeth.
Day 477 of waiting on the Darude's opening, Sandstorm variation
but yea, League is terrible lmaoo what a terrible suggestion from chat lol
Fun Anna! But with all the fun I've had, I think you'd agree that chess is an international sport of sorts. I think so. It is international and the mind is so important. Hence, because I feel so guilty of this "guilty pleasure" I get when I spend time avoiding other important things is that I would ask, please, everyone of Cramling's Crowd, Cramling's team, that you subscribe to Anna of Ukraine. Can't wait for the next video.
Hmmm interesting Anna will give 10 watchers a sub if she loses, but nothing for the person who beats her! So unfair
👑🔥♟️❤️
Ти се навлажни п.тето?
Isn't it funny how people think they are unbeatable so they get other people banned? Kramnic and Naradidtsky... How could he beat ME?!! He must be a cheater! Then there's me, Why can't I get my rating above 1600 on lichess. You don't need to cheat to beat me... LMAO.