'Unholy mess!' - Score review system in serious question post weekend blunder I AFL 360 I Fox Footy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- The AFL 360 panel react to the weekends umpire error and what's the best way to move forward from consistent score review errors.
Subscribe and 🔔 to Fox Footy RUclips 👉 bit.ly/39CUfB1
Stream Fox Footy 👉 kayosports.app...
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
Facebook: / foxfooty
Twitter: / foxfooty
Instagram: / foxfooty
Seeing the fans footage from behind the goals WOW wtf it missed by a foot! and he had a clear view. That guy should be sacked immediately.
I understand we make mistakes but wtf did he see?? Delusional!
if this was south america that goal umpire would of been assasinated by now
Should be a given really
Lots of dodgy weak throw ins that seem to favour one team cant bounce the ball either
Love that it's the next blokes job and Gill has nothing to answer for despite overseeing this disgrace for at least 10 years
I mean I’m any business there always problems arising and the next person always has to look after it so it happens
Seems a tad unfair
He's got big hair. That's all that counts
Gills the most useless, overpaid, overvalued moron ceo in the history of the world!
All he cares about is his bonus and next job.
It’s why he can make stupid decisions like a garbage new broadcast deal and a 19th club while so many clubs are struggling because he knows he doesn’t have to actually deal with the consequences.
“The best angle is from a punter on their phone” sums up how much the AFL has actually invested into their VAR system, as opposed to other sporting bodies.
Maybe if the AFL wasn't so obsessed with the "flow" of the game they could actually make some correct calls! I like the idea of every score within the last 2mins to be reviewed.
This! They’re sacrificing the integrity of the scoreboard and game by wanting to have quick play ons and drama. But commentators complaining about goal reviews and length has been a problem too - they complain about reviews then complain when this indictment happens
@@imalwaysright 100 percent agree.
the integrity of the game has been dragged through the mud over the last 5 years, the implementation of new rules is even more shambolic than the review system
Whatever the AFL’s views are on politically or moral issues, they have no business pushing those views onto fans or players at anytime.
@@sweetsour6350 if it was woke, they'd reverse the decision or do a replay match or give Crows points or something else than the position they've taken. You tried it.
great vision and editing at the start, gave me chills and made me angry again
Nah for games like this the last 5 mins all close scores should be reviewed. I don’t care if it takes another 20 mins
Crows had 3 games lost by goal reviews showing not touched but the review comes back as touched. Then there was the last Collingwood game should have got a blatant free kick in front of goal but was ignored. Such a crock. The team that beats all the top team gets screwed by AFL all the damn time.
Considering I am a Collingwood supporter, I feel for them. A team that never gets frees in their forward 50m and could win the flag with their young squad. Ah well Lucky they didn't make it in!
Yeah us Crows could of done some damage
don't blame the umpire, blame this pretend system that is fundamentally flawed on many levels
your on what he didnt use the system you fool
Yeah the decision to put a multi million dollar league in the hands of one persons eyes
Couldn't agree more! And for Gill to say it wasn't a system error, it was a human error is bullshit. The system is there to remove the human error and it failed
@@Gazman67exactly!! Because they don’t review behinds because they want to make the game faster and higher scoring. Idiots!!
@@bayden99Gil’s presser was poor. The (current) system is flawed, so it was both system and human error
It's probably useless speculation, but I wonder what would have happened if this scenario was repeated for a big Victorian club. I doubt if 'Oops, sorry chaps, move on' would cut it.
It literally happened to Melbourne the week before. Goal was called touched in the dying moments when it wasn’t. Cost Melbourne the game
Gerard laid it out perfectly
The fancam behind the goals is damning!!
If it was a Collingwood game there would still be rioting, and rightly so.
Exactly right. We would never have taken this laying down not a Fkn chance.
@@evehsv5556 Imagine if it happened to Collingwood in the Grand Final this year (if they get there). They'd burn the stadium down.
@@pcorf For sure Buddy. Do the right thing nothing happens do the wrong thing and chaos erupts. 😂😂😂
The Afl can't afford to have the Swans miss the finals.
Swans make finals every year
Too bad don’t cheat to get the result you want. Should’ve overturned it the minute they admitted it was a mistake.
Don’t put down to malice what can be easily explained by incompetence.
Yes, because the afl often alters the scores of games because of umpiring mistakes . They should what they usually do when an umpire makes a mistake, add a goal to one of the teams. Otherwise they are corrupt. 🤡
Yep, the AFL asked North to mess up their interchange, and then said to the goal umpire that if it goes close to automatically call it a point… (far easier to blame a conspiracy than actually think about it).
crows supporter here, never have i felt more upset and angry after a game, i was sitting in the nosebleeds of the riverbank stand, and it was a clear as day goal even from there, i actually can’t accept that the goal umpire could have possibly thought that was a point, utterly disgraceful
Give the crows the 4 points and move on. An apology is not enough.
Could have been 7 teams actively playing for a position in the eight. Due to one non-call to make use of a technology, only three teams will be fighting for a place in the eight.
AFL created this mess, Changed the rules around kick in's (dont have to wait for the white flag from both umps). An absolute mess and the AFL will give some under the table deal to keep Adelaide quiet
Yup! 100%. We can’t allow 20seconds of down time while umpires confer or a ball is run back to the centre.
They suspend the goal umpires, what about the three central umpires, or do they have vision problems, so get off?
We have a league that has a poor score review system.
We have a league that has unfair draws towards certain clubs.
We have a league that make a team play home game 80kms away from home.
We have a league we're home games are not really home games at times.
We have a league that favours a certain clubs supporters .
It's cooked. The whole thing.
The phone behind the goals being the best footage is not correct. The first angle they showed in this video it was clearly a goal, if they reviewed that, the technology would have got it right!
Two umpire mistakes cost Adelaide 2 games this year, and a finals appearance. They should be in the 8 now. It’s NOT GOOD enough! Even the NRL do it better with captains challenges and score reviews.
that's right, the AFL is so far behind the times and with so much money being made, that they can afford to improve the technology. It isn't just the Crows that have been robbed because of poor umpiring on the goal line, other teams have been screwed as well.
for a professional sport that is the AFL, these sorts of issues are sub-standard, and are in need of serious fixing, they cannot have fan footage that is far superior to their technology, as the optics of it is terrible.
It's not the umpiring decisions. Adelaide are still a developing team, and part of their development is needing to learn to play harder and tougher for longer. This is all part of a learning experience for them. If they are good enough they will benefit greatly from the setbacks that they have experienced this season. Look at what happened with Geelong a year or two later after they led all night in the 2005 Semi Final against the Swans in Sydney, only to have Nick Davis steal the lead off them and put the Swans in front with just seconds remaining. They won 3 flags from 4 Grand Final appearances in 5 years.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038that is called distraction and deflection - politicians try that on all the time.
The worst part is the AFL hasn't acknowledged or even posted this apology on their social media pages. I understand that Matthew Nicks doesn't want to be a pessimist and say we lost it in the 1st and 2nd quarter and not blame the umpires, but the reality is we won the game and only lost due to this monstrosity of an error BY the umpires.
The Crows are entitled to compensation under the law, it is a walk-up start finished win case. I believe if the Crows CEO does not want to pursue this case then he needs to step down from his position or be dismissed. Any other out come is un acceptable and Crows fans could boycott future AFL matches. Negligence, it has happened before therefore it was foreseeable in the future and the AFL has done nothing to remedy. clear cut negligence.
Afl fined a club 100k for not properly doing concussion tests.
How much should afl have to pay for not correctly doing a review?
Don't get me started
Richmond vs Brisbane last year.
yep, the AFL has been asleep at the wheel on this for 15 years, now the bus has crashed and Adelaide have to pay the price.
you need higher fps cameras for replays afl, the frame skips sometimes are too big.
Cricket has the review system right. In the hands of the captain of the offended side, as it bloody well should be!
ITS SIMPLE! Review all goals and all behinds. Problem solved. Also buy some proper slow motion cameras!!
They don’t review behinds because they want to make the game quicker in the hopes it will be higher scoring , attract more fans and make more money. It’s all about money. Forget the money review the behinds get good cameras and cut the bullshit.
Even at the bare minimum they need the goal line camera to be 4K 60fps. You need better frame by frame slow motion. RUclipsrs have better camera equipment.
I have never been an Adelaide supporter, but, the AFL in its jurisdiction and ? wisdom, should have overruled the decision and given the 4 points to the Crows. Even the crowd at the far end saw this as a goal.
There was over a minute to go… ridiculous comment. If it was the last play then yes.
maybe should replay the match? what do you think the solution is?@@jamescaldwell7396
Seriously, this has been a problem for years and should have been addressed at the beginning as the pictures look almost like a child's painting. It never was good enough and the system was never good enough, but now that it has affected a teams finals chances, it has become an issue. This was always going to happen, should have been addressed from the start.
I’ve commented before and I’m still disgusted with this ( I’m a Blues supporter btw) it is not just the monumental error from the goal umpire, but the field umpires are not even spoken about. They would have seen how close this was and the manifestation of Crows players celebrations. So why in the fucking hell didn’t they have it looked at?
Because shitney
GET RID of Hitting The Post Rule It s 2023 They Talk About Getting Rid Of Centre Bounces WAKE UP AFL Adelaide Should Protest
All of this could be implemented and makes sense, there doesn't need to be a soft call, all goals can be reviewed immediately and if the umpire got it wrong they can ring the siren, stop play, call the correct score and reset the timer. Players/captains should also be able to call for a video review.
The only thing with Players & Captains calling for a review ... I can clearly see already in my mind that it will be used as a delaying tactic especially when it's a close game... Not allowing for the attacking side to try & move the ball quickly...
I do totally agree with everything else 👍👍👍
@@moocher9935Agree, it’s a grey area that essentially implements a “timeout” If there is a captain review, where teams can reset their structure. Not sure what the best option going forward is.
@@moocher9935 If you were to make it that the Captain only has 1 strike on a call for video review. Then if the request was determined to be a correct request, they keep their video request. If they are wrong about the request then they no longer can use it. Pretty simple way to make it so that it cant be abused.
@@Sterkleton_ again I agree to a point with your philosophy but again... If it's a tight game & the review has not been used then it could still be used as delaying tac tic
@@Sterkleton_the only fair way is that all goals get reviewed... don't want a goal to be reviewed, then don't let the opposition have a shot on goal. If you do then put up with a goal being reviewed.
So why wasn't human error allowed for the concussion testing? Fined the club any player should now,be able to use human error as an excuse when reported. Good enough for Gill to use that excuse why can't everyone else?
The new rule should be if it hits the post and goes in its a goal. If it hits the point posts and goes in its a point. If it hits any post and goes back on the field the ball stays in play. All that has to be reviewed then is that the ball has gone past the posts and that it has not been touched. If the umpire is not sure about it being touched then the call should be done by the review system. If that is not conclusive then its a goal. This minimizes umpire error and umpire manipulation.
100% agree, need to be removing the grey area from our game. To suspend the umpire over one bad call when there should be policies/procedures in place to prevent this from happening. 👍👍
Not a new idea… nevertheless its a great one… lets also introduce the SANFL last touch out of bounds off the boot… two grey areas that constantly upset the paying public..now if we could ever get the holding the ball/incorrect disposal rule fixed it would again be a great game…!
Imagine scores are level and you have a shot after the siren. Any score will win. You hit the goal post, it bounces back into play for no score and the game ends in a draw. Meanwhile, if you had shanked the kick a further 6 metres off line and it barely scraped in for a behind, you would have won. Doesn't that seem a little silly?
Just get rid of posts, if you then kick it over the boundary, anywhere on the oval, it's a goal! That would be as sensible as that idea.
@@mangoman2148 No that's not silly. In soccer the ball has to go into the goal. If it hits the post and goes in, its a goal. If it hits the post and bounces out it is no score. Simple. Most games that have Goal posts have these rules
#Award1stRoundDraftPicks - AFL make this right. Award compensation first round picks to Adelaide for multiple stuffups and all the other hardships you have forced this club to endure since it's existence.
Accountability, great. Weldone AFL. Where is the compensation?
🤣🤣
The AFL has to implement the same system as association football/soccer. The fact that not only all goals are reviewed but potential penalties, disallowed goals and red card challenges can all be reviewed while normal play resumes shows that the system can and does work when implemented correctly. This has to happen in 2024. No excuses.
HAPPENED AGAIN IN THE HAWKS GAME Dylan Moore looked like he kicked a goal and umpire called a point but it needed to be reviewed that's like the day after this one!!!
Chiefs v Bengals Championship Game last season the teams ran another play before the referee made a correction and reset the clock. Thats what should happen in the AFL.
All this talk! So SIMPLE to fix! Thru the goal...ITS A GOAL...touch post or not! No time wasting on reviews, no mistakes!
Sirengate, they overturned the descison, why arent they doing it now? The precident was set then, whats changed now? The ceo has come out and said its a goal, so it should have been a goal. Crows need to fight this so much more! Afl needs to pay crows a massive fine and more than justvan apology. As a pies fan that was at the game, its an absolute joke!
While I agree about Sirengate, the conditions were different. Sirengate was about play continuing after the final siren sounded and shots for goal after that final siren sounded. For this match, there was still over a minute to play, and there would have been a different setup and positioning with that much time left. You’re looking at a kick in from a point versus a center bounce clearance, 6-6-6, and then getting numbers back to defend. The time left makes all the difference.
AFL stuffed up and now the 2023 season doesn't even matter.
I am a Carlton supporter and in the previous weeks match against Melbourne the disallowed goal from Petracca in the final minute looked like it was a goal. If the technology was up to scratch in a multi billion dollar industry, this would have probably been resolved the right way. Marchbank may have touched it but he will be the only one who really knows for sure. Technically (very technically) the field umpire could have paid a free to Marchbank for chopping of the arm however, I think if it was (and probably should have been) called a goal, I would have had no issues with that.
I would, Marchbank isn't a liar.
the thing is the soft call was a point and they couldn't tell wheteher its been touched or not so its not a dissallowed goal as the soft call was touched
So if the Gil and the rest of the AFL are truly sorry about this, why don’t they implement something NOW to make sure this injustice does not happen again. I’m willing to bet that they implement nothing of worth before finals or before next week. Nothing. So are they truly sorry and are they willing to do something? No they’re not. It’s all shallow public talk. The question remains…Why can’t they do something this year? What is stopping them? Incompetence, laziness? Yeah, probably
Gerard used the word "unacceptable", but everyone is being asked to accept it. Perhaps not going forward, but for the rnd 23 game.
An umpire on the field can override another umpires decision and call play back, why can't a review umpire over ride the goal umpire if they have seen clear evidence within 10-20 seconds of the incident? Easy solution
Im done with the AFL and gone back to local footy where they really need and appreciate the support. Vote with your wallets and purses.
What about the Jeremy Cameron goal against Collingwood when he got hand balled the ball while standing a meter or so over the boundary, does the AFL only care about umpiring decisions if they happen in the final stages and directly affect who wins
these stuff ups have happened far too often not only in this season to multiple other teams, but also in prior seasons, the AFL have enough money to imrpove the tech, such as having a hotspot system in place to ensure that the ball either doesn't touch the player, or hits the post. In the case of the Adelaide Crows, having cameras pointing downwards from the top of each goalpost.
that anything close like that should immediately be sent upstairs, the reality is, this is meant to be a professional sport, these sorts of things are not good enough, which brings into play, that the AFL should allow for each team to instigate score reviews tactically, which could be a couple of score reviews per quarter, and to have a single decision review for wrong calls or non-calls anywhere on the field.
for a professional sport, the umpiring at times has been shocking, having player reviews, would most likely make the umpires be a little more careful about their decisions, for a professional sport, having umpiring this bad at times, is simply not good enough, it has happened far too often this season, and in prior seasons, too many teams have been screwed over by terrible umpiring.
Quite simply should have been checked. I don't think it matters who you support you have to call this an absolute disgrace. The AFL HAS TO compensate the Crows for this and compensate very heavily.
The AFL is a joke, they should have overturned that result immediately or even now? talk about stuffing up a once great game. The quicker Gil go's away the better and take that goal umpire with you as well.
And also the tigers vs lions that final in 2022
Tom lych goal. Tigers should of won that match as it didn’t hit the post
Yeah but it went over the post meaning it hit the post. Was a point the moment he decided not to kick a drop punt from 10m out.
It's a sports betting nightmare also
AFL need a VAR, the ability to check goals well after the fact, and far more cameras and better slowmo
Tom Hickey knew that was a goal 😮
The best thing to do would be to remove the four points from Sydney and replay the match on the weekend before the finals.....but we know the AFL won't do that.
Great idea. Or golden point so the teams can rest up still
@@spaceballs2462 Also, unless there is BLATANT evidence that the ball hit the post (e.g. deviation of trajectory) or was touched (e.g. visible movement of fingers or deviation of trajectory), it should always be called a goal.
Anything inconclusive should be a GOAL, this would stop anything like this from happening.
It has been flagged all year that this technology or lack of, will cost a team their place in the final.. Well here it is, shattering.
The afl should have had the balls to overturn the games result. Complete bullshit.
Just go back to players can't kick in if a point until umpire has signalled with his flags to other goal umpire. That gives time to review ..
If it was richmond it would be glossed over as a point nothing to see here
Definitely should be checks on any suspicious bank transactions for both the goal umpire and field umpire. The way the goal umpire was so quick on the signal seemed really suspicious to me. I'm no crows fan either!
I also saw many boundary throw ins that favoured sydney on the western wing by the same umpire its in a lot of games
Jordan is right, what if this happens again in a final, which is possible. They will have to tweak a rule.
It’s a circus 🤡
I've been saying this for years
We still talk about the marchbank call but people don’t talk about van rooyen chopping his arm which you can’t do so would’ve been a free kick anyway
I'd be demanding replaying the 70 seconds. Blind freddy could tell that was a goal. Hate the crows with a passion but cant have that
The NHL's system is the best is sport, if the refs can't make a call it goes to the match centre in Toronto where they have better technology to make the right call. Sometimes this takes upwards of 5 mins but you know the right call is going to be made
With the AFL pushing supporters into betting on games who becomes responsible for the monies lost due to the failures. With the amount of money bookies are making on games how much is being offered to officials to fix results? That one decision wasn't the only questionable one made by umpires that cost Adelaide's the game. It was almost like the AFL wanted the Crows to lose.
it shouldn't have been down to a review to cost the game, 7 (8 if you count the goal that "hit" the post) behinds being kicked in last quarter cost the game. Have to do better. And AFL robbed them, dont get me wrong, biggest robbery in the history of mankind
I know what you're saying, but they did enough to win. Teams shouldn't have to account for errors like this.
Should have been overturned.
Why don't they go to a review system if the game is that close and in the final minutes of s game?
Unpardonable mistake in this day of technology!
What about the high speed motion cameras MythBusters were using 20 plus years ago??!!
The afl should be ashamed
Crows supporter here but this is proof that the afl chooses its team for a fairytale finish. I'm looking at Sydney, Collingwood (no offence) and Brisbane. Good luck port in finals with umpires like that.
Karma will greet those swans in finals
People saying either it’s the umpires fault or the technology’s fault, when clearly both are at fault, the technology is awful half the time because the frame rate of all but 1 camera is abysmal, sometimes the video evidence is clear and correct calls are made, but other times impossible to tell because of the blurry vision, which is then referred back to the umpire who wasn’t sure in the first place.
Then you have the Adelaide situation where the umpire didn’t even call for a review, which the video evidence clearly would’ve overturned his call, it’s both humans and the technology that’s unbelievably flawed, and both need to be improved immensely as soon as possible, the only consistent thing about score review is snicko, this has screwed up the season beyond belief.
The AFL gets more and more corrupt every year this is just another example of a fixed match. Won’t be watching the afl ever again this is the last straw
You’ll be watching the finals
You’ll be sorely missed.
The most disgusting thing I've seen in football since the Filth Matthews did to Bruns a blight on our National Game worse still the eyes on the world on Australia at the time as the Women's World cup was on same Night ,shame shame shame
I’m pissed.
A multi billion dollar sport to worried about political issues instead of having a world class review system.
Correct getting involved in things that the have no right to. just fn woke B/S
Exactly, too busy shoving left-wing politics down peoples' throats instead of focusing on the game.
Knowing that it was a mistake i cant understand how they cant overide the loss and give the Crows the win. We all know the swans were cooked the crows ran over the top of the swans.
Because there was still a minute left duhh how can you claim a crows win?!?
@@yacobshelelshaddai4543 So it's ok to deny Adelaide a real goal that they fairly kicked, on the off chance that maybe Sydney would have kicked a goal against the flow of play? You realize for the quarter it was 37 points to 1, 12 scoring shots to 1.
@@yacobshelelshaddai4543 Easy the Swans had stopped no run in there legs and the crows were the team doing the scoring and after the goal the players were celebrating the goal after ten to twenty seconds they got the incorrect news and it shocked them. Like it would it was blattently clear the ball didn't touch the post at any stage of its journey.Ben keays would be devastated knowing he kicked the winning goal with just over a minute to go. Only to find out it was mistakedly ruled a behind. And teams can bounce back but coaches can lose their jobs at the end of a season like this, Nicks has done a great job this year only to realise all hope of finals are now dashed. 32 point lead at 3 quarter time only to be overun by a hungry crows outfit tells you all you need to know about the likely winner of this match.
I love AFL because of the quirks. Bad decisions occur every game. Demons v Blues - even the score review couldn't work it out so it's the umpires decision. In the Crows v Sydney game , score review would have reversed the umpires decision. Bad decisions happen all the time - its just what happens in our game. Lets not go down the path of reviewing every decision. How many incorrect free kicks directly result in goals? Will we review those too? We'll end up reviewing every decision and 100 minutes of football will take many hours to complete.
AN APOLOGY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! Do the right thing AFL. The whole 2023 season is now a farce.
Absolute joke! If this was a Victorian team it would of never happened... Cheaters
Absolute disgrace. Time to drain the VFL swamp
I personally dislike the crows, but this is a business, not a sport.
The AFL should be held liable for faulty workplace practice and duly sued for financial losses.
Technically the game should have been null and void and replayed the following week.
They should have called for the reveiw......the umpire is to blame ....where he was standing no way he could have been certain just B.......s
Yep. Umpire needs to be sacked, AFL needs to implement rule changes yada yada yada. How about the Crows take some responsibility for their crap goal kicking, which has cost them games all year. Four goals eight in that last quarter with at least three of those behinds being set shots from within the 50. Kick anyone of those three and this discussion becomes a footnote instead of the main game.
The afl is a mickey mouse organisation. Cant even follow its own rules set in place and then it makes changes to them every year wonder why noone can get these calls right. Pretty basic one to be fair though. Also think its not the umpires fault. Crows should have won 14-15 games this year we did that to ourselves in a way. All we can do is start pre season early and show them next year why we should be in September.
Was it a bad call? Yes, it was a bad call, but to say the crows didn't make the finals because of this is stupid. It's one decision in an entire season. The crows didn't make the finals because they can't win on the road. They didn't win this match because they were outplayed by Sydney for most of the match. Its ridiculous to say one decision has ruined their season. As for the umpire, for years people have been saying that the video review is used to much and that it slows down the game and that umpires should just make the call and here we are, the umpire made a call and now everyone is saying he should have reviewed it. Utter ridiculous. I'm sorry for the crows fans but to your whole season down to this is a let off on your players and staff.
The only person that I have seen commenting on here so far who can see this for what it really is. I 100% wholeheartedly agree with everything that you have said. I get it that the wrong decision got made by the goal umpire. But it hasn't cost the Crows their season, as everyone else on here seems to think. It has only cost them the match against the Swans. The Crows have lost several close matches this season. Had they won even half of these they wouldn't be in the position that they find themselves in now. They've only got themselves to blame for missing the finals, and cannot blame one incorrect goal umpiring decision for this.
You can say that about any team scrapping into the finals. When teams come back from a terrible first half or from 50 points down, we praise them. But if they come back and it's an umpire error, you say get over it. You wouldn't have the same view if it was your team.
Yes the call was wrong....but you're right. Adelaide were just not good enough throughout the season. Even at home, they struggled against the Sydney Swans and lost to GWS.
Even if they made the finals, they would just be making up the numbers.
Throughout most games there are countless potential free kicks missed, if a player had prior opportunity to dispose, was it high or did the player duck, how far players run with the ball without bouncing, in the back decisions and all the incidents that happen off the ball, we can’t go to a system that every contest is being reviewed, or a 3 hour game will turn into a 6 hour game
I thought the Carlton v melb deck was bad.. this is appalling
What rubbish their season ended when they kicked 4 goals 8 behinds in the last quarter as well as their appalling kicking for goal at crucial times throughout the year.
Hotspot technology similar to cricket review system is the obvious answer.
Terrible mistake but a human mistake. Nonetheless, Adelaide are a great side, and as Matty Nicks said, someone broke the mirror.
If it's about kick ims and defense set to stop quick kick in.make players stop and not move until kick in comes to give no advantage to kick in defending team
Corruption of the highest level. Be interesting to see who the goal up supports
It’s not corruption, it’s just blinkered inaction. The only thing keeping it there is that it screws over every team - but this is bigger than any other so they surely can’t sit on their hands any longer.
Many of the boundary throw ins favoured sydney , particularly western side not hard to see
Bro using the music from Dunkirk for an AFL montage lol
cricket, has high def, ultra high frame rate replays where you can see a fleas arse on the ball. in afl its a shaky cam with Vaseline over the lens.
why cant Gil spend some of his millions his pillaged over the past decade and fix this trash