Frank Luntz Gives Message To University Presidents After Claudine Gay Scandal: 'Your Words Matter'

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024
  • Top pollster Frank Luntz joined Diane Brady on "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss his message to University Presidents.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

Комментарии • 46

  • @Missplants-pomnifan
    @Missplants-pomnifan 10 месяцев назад +23

    Double standards for different races is not right.

  • @user-fs8tl7ni1w
    @user-fs8tl7ni1w 10 месяцев назад +17

    Hire on one criterion alone, only one. MERIT!

  • @gavinlevy1693
    @gavinlevy1693 10 месяцев назад +10

    DEI: divide, exclude, indoctrinate

  • @RY-kd8vi
    @RY-kd8vi 10 месяцев назад +1

    Well said, Frank, but they don't care.

  • @rockfidelity8229
    @rockfidelity8229 9 месяцев назад +2

    Why do people think she's a DEI hire? That lady went to the absolute best schools this country has to offer.

    • @rockfidelity8229
      @rockfidelity8229 9 месяцев назад

      Try to get into Phillips Exeter Academy

    • @rockfidelity8229
      @rockfidelity8229 9 месяцев назад +1

      If you scrutinize the work of everybody who has spent their life in academia I guarantee you'll find instances of plagiarism. This lady is as insider as they come, if you think you just going to push her out by waving the DEI flag you're crazy.

    • @scottjones1109
      @scottjones1109 9 месяцев назад +3

      Do you really think DEI had nothing to do with her being hired to Presidentially preside over Harvard?
      The fact that she somehow checked EVERY desired DEI box must be seen as just dumb (but good) luck to you.

    • @scottjones1109
      @scottjones1109 9 месяцев назад

      @@rockfidelity8229 EVERYTHING she's ever done professionally is now being highly scrutinized by people who want her head.
      Her testimony before congress along with her many plagiarisms ought to be enough to get her but they probably won't.
      The Harvard powers that be, who undoubtedly want us to believe these criticisms are all about race & gender, are preparing to defend the indefensible.
      And why not go to war? Academics are today very skilled at making bad appear to be good, wrong look like it's right, and immorality seem as though it's moral.

    • @rockfidelity8229
      @rockfidelity8229 9 месяцев назад +2

      @scottjones1109 what qualifications would she need to have to not be a DEI hire?

  • @cathyallen4744
    @cathyallen4744 9 месяцев назад

    No university employee should have a job if they plagiarized a paper!

  • @williambruckner6049
    @williambruckner6049 9 месяцев назад

    I wouldn't equate plagiarism of any sort with a stellar academic record.

  • @larswetterstrom7209
    @larswetterstrom7209 9 месяцев назад

    Its not about safety......It is a faulty track.

  • @dertythegrower
    @dertythegrower 10 месяцев назад +4

    Frank has become slower and slower and now less respected.... what a bad take here, yet again.

    • @md.muzahidulislamsamrat8037
      @md.muzahidulislamsamrat8037 10 месяцев назад

      "In fact, it’s these three words, terror not territory, that we need to understand how Israeli propaganda works. Territory is about history. I once had a student tell me that the most radical class I taught was where I went over the actual history using maps of the conflict. Once you know the facts, it’s very clear what the just and moral position should be, especially if you’re neutral within this. That is why the history is made out to be so complex that only experts can speak.
      The reality, of course, is that the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the simplest and most straightforward in the modern world to explain-if you just tell the story of territory, if you just tell the history, if you stick essentially to the facts. So Luntz says, this is his advice, he says, avoid history. Avoid facts. Focus instead on terrorism.
      In the same report, Luntz goes on to outline strategies for how to deal with horrific civilian casualties that will inevitably make their way before the eyes of the American public.
      Once you’ve done that, Luntz says, you also have to get people to empathize with Israelis by describing what life is like for them, living in constant fear of Hamas rocket attacks. So again and again, we hear the focus-tested phrase that the rockets are raining down on Israel.... Clips show newspeople and leaders repeating the phrase “Hamas rockets raining down on Israel.” Any advertising executive will tell you the essence of propaganda is repetition. Then the Israelis ask the American people what would you do?]
      The story never starts with the violence of the occupation. The story always starts with Hamas rockets. In fact, if Hamas did not exist, Israel would have to invent it. It really matters where history starts, where the story starts. If it starts with the violence of the occupation, then what the Palestinians are engaged in is legitimate resistance. If however it starts with Hamas rockets, then what the Palestinians are doing is terrorism. One of those stories, it works much better for Israel than the other one. The function of PR is to put this story, that the responsibility for the violence lies with the Palestinians, to put those ideas and your words into someone else’s mouth so that it does not appear as your speech.
      That is the essence of public relations. It is how it is different from advertising. Advertising is visible and it’s clear who is speaking. The best PR is invisible because you’ve got someone else, in this case hapless and hopeless American journalists, to mouth your words. I’m not even sure they know what they’re doing."
      Professor Sut Jhally

  • @dertythegrower
    @dertythegrower 10 месяцев назад +3

    Frank is a rich guy who talks to a preselected small group... no sense of reality in the big city

  • @jaemoon3593
    @jaemoon3593 10 месяцев назад +1

    Woke = unenlightened

  • @williamhenry9705
    @williamhenry9705 10 месяцев назад +2

    Yall know she gonna claim Jews set her up.

  • @Sharon-r1v
    @Sharon-r1v 10 месяцев назад +3

    That's what Biden said about Trump!

  • @CUTS67
    @CUTS67 10 месяцев назад +4

    "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today."-Claudine Gay

    • @Ann12681
      @Ann12681 10 месяцев назад +4

      Cuts67 : Great comment, I doubt this generation at Harvard even knows who Dr. King was. It would break his heart.

  • @brendatenorio5721
    @brendatenorio5721 10 месяцев назад

    Presidents need to hone messages and programs. But everyone stop pandering.

  • @davidc8527
    @davidc8527 10 месяцев назад +2

    Lutz and Brady sounds like a b rated sitcom...............

  • @igorm6944
    @igorm6944 10 месяцев назад +1

    who said that " by any means?" ,just didn't get it

  • @dertythegrower
    @dertythegrower 10 месяцев назад +3

    Why would we want his opinion when he is a guy who does basic reporter questions and lives in the big city far from working class?

    • @scottjones1109
      @scottjones1109 9 месяцев назад

      Why WOULDN'T we want his opinion, or ANYBODY's opinion for that matter, if what they are saying is true?

  • @jungleforeva
    @jungleforeva 10 месяцев назад +1

    Is Frank still living with Kevin or did they break up when Kevo lost the speaker position?

  • @soccersprint
    @soccersprint 10 месяцев назад

    More people looking for attention.

  • @Muza-f8k
    @Muza-f8k 10 месяцев назад

    Мы то долго живем

  • @mariela7521
    @mariela7521 10 месяцев назад +1

    No entendí nada

  • @md.muzahidulislamsamrat8037
    @md.muzahidulislamsamrat8037 10 месяцев назад +1

    "In fact, it’s these three words, terror not territory, that we need to understand how Israeli propaganda works. Territory is about history. I once had a student tell me that the most radical class I taught was where I went over the actual history using maps of the conflict. Once you know the facts, it’s very clear what the just and moral position should be, especially if you’re neutral within this. That is why the history is made out to be so complex that only experts can speak.
    The reality, of course, is that the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the simplest and most straightforward in the modern world to explain-if you just tell the story of territory, if you just tell the history, if you stick essentially to the facts. So Luntz says, this is his advice, he says, avoid history. Avoid facts. Focus instead on terrorism.
    In the same report, Luntz goes on to outline strategies for how to deal with horrific civilian casualties that will inevitably make their way before the eyes of the American public.
    Once you’ve done that, Luntz says, you also have to get people to empathize with Israelis by describing what life is like for them, living in constant fear of Hamas rocket attacks. So again and again, we hear the focus-tested phrase that the rockets are raining down on Israel.... Clips show newspeople and leaders repeating the phrase “Hamas rockets raining down on Israel.” Any advertising executive will tell you the essence of propaganda is repetition. Then the Israelis ask the American people what would you do?]
    The story never starts with the violence of the occupation. The story always starts with Hamas rockets. In fact, if Hamas did not exist, Israel would have to invent it. It really matters where history starts, where the story starts. If it starts with the violence of the occupation, then what the Palestinians are engaged in is legitimate resistance. If however it starts with Hamas rockets, then what the Palestinians are doing is terrorism. One of those stories, it works much better for Israel than the other one. The function of PR is to put this story, that the responsibility for the violence lies with the Palestinians, to put those ideas and your words into someone else’s mouth so that it does not appear as your speech.
    That is the essence of public relations. It is how it is different from advertising. Advertising is visible and it’s clear who is speaking. The best PR is invisible because you’ve got someone else, in this case hapless and hopeless American journalists, to mouth your words. I’m not even sure they know what they’re doing."
    Professor Sut Jhally